MIGO Mvt 311 no batch copy to receiving location

I tried to perform Mvt typ 311 to transfer batch stock from 1 location to another. I have entered batch number in source location and expect the receiving location has the same batch proposed automatically, but it is not the case.
I tried Mvt Type 311 for same item and batch in MB1B, the system automatically proposed the source batch as receiving location batch.
Any reason for that ?

I did not make it clear in my question.
The problem arises in MIGO which Mvt Type 311 does not copy batch from source to receiving storage location. However, in MB1B, there is no such problem.

Similar Messages

Transfer Posting problem via MIGO MVT 311

While doing transfer posting through MIGO MVT 311 against reservation, we are facing the problem displayed below:-
"Check table XMRES: entry 0000000000 0001 does not exist
Message no. M7001
Diagnosis
In table XMRES the entry 0000000000 0001 is missing."

You cannot use 311 .311 is Moving material from one storage location to another -- Un restricted to another, Reserved stock can be moved by converting in to another movement type .Do movement 341in mb1c , if 341 is not there then go to moment type control
data and create particular moment type and run that for reservation no
document created and in valuation area

TO not getting created Automatically for mvt 311

Hi,
I am facing issue while doing Stock transfer between 2 Sloc. TO is not automatically getting created once i do stock transfer in MB1B for mvt 311.
I checked Tcode OMKX,OMKY,OMKZ, in all of them "A" is maintained in Automatic TO field.
Kindly let me know if i have missed any configuration.
I want to create TO automatically once i do Stock transfer in MB1B.
Please help.
Regards
Utsav

Hello Utsav,
For WH managed sloc to non WH sloc transfer, use WM movement type 311
For Non WH managed sloc to WH managed sloc transfer, use WM movement type 312
Try following setting. I believe you have following two cases,
Case I
If you are moving the stock from warehouse managed sloc to non warehouse managed sloc do following
(1)     OLML->INTERFACE-> LE-WM MTYPE.
Add following setting
Warehouse number, reference movement type 311, WM movement type 311, auto TR flag = X, immediate TO = A
(2)     OLML->Activity--> Transfer -
>Define movement type
For WM movement type 311 setting ,
--Destination cat = 921,
--Set background processing Automatic TO indicator = A
(3) Do MB1B- movement type 311 --- and enter receiving sloc as warehouse managed sloc and issuing storage location as non warehouse managed sloc.
With these setting system will create automatic TO from TR. You can then confirm the TO manually.
Case II'
If you have a situation of moving the stock from non-warehouse managed sloc to warehouse managed sloc then proceed as below.
(1) OLML----> Activity -
>Transfer
For WM movement type 312, ((if WM movement type 312 is not present then coped from 311)
Source cat.= 321
(ii) auto TR flag = X, immediate TO = A
(2) OLML ->Interface->Movement type --->LE-WM MTYPE
Add following setting
Warehouse number, reference movement type as 312, WM movement type as 312, Auto TR flag = X, Immediate TO flag = A
(3)     Now do MB1B with 312 movement type
Add receiving sloc as warehouse managed sloc and issuing sloc as non warehouse managed sloc
With these setting system will create automatic TO from TR. You can then confirm the TO manually.
Thanks,
Milind

Automatic TO creation for Mvt 311

Hi,
I am facing issue while doing Stock transfer between 2 Sloc. TO is not automatically getting created once i do stock transfer in MB1B for mvt 311.
I checked Tcode OMKX,OMKY,OMKZ, in all of them "A" is maintained in Automatic TO field.
Kindly let me know if i have missed any configuration.
I want to create TO automatically once i do Stock transfer in MB1B.
Please help.
Regards
Utsav
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jul 12, 2011 11:25 AM

Hi
Kindly cjheck the move type details.
LE-WM-ACTIVITY-TRASFERS-DEFINE MOV TYPES-SELECT 311 - CHECK THE TR REQ INDICATORS.
Laxman

After MIGO mvt 101, moving stock to blocked.

Hi,
after posting a good receipt with MIGO (mvt type 101) I want to move this stock into blocked stocked
using the material document of the goods receipt.
How can I do this?
I tried with MIGO selecting transfer postings, material document and indicating the material document
of the goods receipt but system can't allow this:
Diagnosis
You want to post a goods receipt, goods issue, or transfer posting with
    a material document as a reference. The document entered does not
    correspond with the prerequisites in order to be used as a reference
    using this functionality.
System response
The prerequisite of this functionality is that there is a material
    document without a reference, in other words, the document posted at the
    time must have been an 'Other' goods receipt/goods issue or an 'Other'
    transfer posting, according to the selection.
If, for example, you want to post a goods receipt, you cannot use a
    transfer posting document as a reference.
Procedure
Choose a document suitable for the selected activity.

Hi,
If you want to post to Blocked stock, do it while you are taking the GR - 101 -blocked stock. When it clears the inspection then you can transfer that to unresricted stock.
But here remember, you can not transfer with ref. to material document. Input the material and Quantity.......
You can also explore the functionality of 103 nad 105. Posting to Gr-Blocked Stock and releaseing from GR-Blocked stock. Here you can transfer with ref. to material document. Most of the companies use this functionality, in case material needs intial or visual inspection.
Hope this resolves your issue.
Thanks,
Kris

Obsolete and batch users can receive work items

Dear Experts,
Currently, we have found a problem that obsolete and batch users can receive work items by manual forwarding from someone. The roles and responsibilities of obsolete users were removed and users have been locked. For Batchuser, it's only created for some certain job with limited roles.
Could you help advise if this's a behavior of workflow or it's from some authorization problem? We have concern for business impact since no one is really handling work items and important messages are out of sight.
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards, Kae

Hello,
This is standard behaviour. It is even possible to send work items to users who do not yet exist (e.g. someone who is due to join the company).
The easiest way to workaround is to set up a substitution for any users that get locked and for background users. Personal substitutes can be maintained directly in table HRUS_D2, you could possibly write your own maintenance transaction for this if it is to be an ongoing issue.
Hope that helps,
Mike
Message was edited by:
Mike Pokraka

Batch Copy ID3v2 to ID3v1

I've been hunting for a software title that will allow me to batch copy the ID3v2 data in my iTunes library to ID3v1. Obviously I prefer ID3v2, what with the longer fields and artwork support, but the CD player in my car only digs ID3v1. =( Anyone know of such a title?

iTunes will convert to ID3v1 in the Advanced/Convert ID3 Tags. As you know, v2 tags can hold more and you will lose this information if you convert. If I were doing this I would make a copy of all my MP3 files and make a separate library. Start itunes using that library and then just use those for your car and keep the other ones with the added features for your ocmputer.

Batch Copy

Dear All,
I have a requirement for BATCH COPY in BATCH Master
When i use MSC1N for Batch Creation that time System Should Copy the "Batch No" to "Vendor Batch No" Field.
Please help
Regards
Amey Kulkarni

We have many exits for batches especially for batch numbers. check this SAP help
[Batch exits|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/dc/1d4b6e5733d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm]
But I dont understand, you are creating the batch manuallly and is it a time consuming work to just copy/paste the batch number in the vendor batch.. because you need to think is it worth spend time on exits when it can be done easily. But it's still possible if you work with an ABAPER with the help of above exits.

MIgo- Mvt Type 101- Amount in Local Currency

Dear Experts,
Require you valuable suggestions in resolving issue concerned with MIGO, MVT Type 101, Amount in local currency.
I have the following scenario../ steps followed..
a. Material Master created with Moving Average price
b. No Stock exists for the material
c. Purchase Order Created for material with Quantity - 1 ea and price PBxx= 100.00 GBP. No Taxes applicable
d. GR/ IR check in unticked and Inv. Receipt is ticked in the Invoice tabl of the Purchase Order. GR/ IR not to be maade mandatory.
e. Initially invoice is posted for qty 1. and value of 70.00 GBP
f. Further another move invoice is posted for the same line item of the PO for Qty 1 and value of 30. GBP.
g. Referring point e & f above- 2 invoices have been posted for quantity 2 toial value of 100.00 GBP
h. MIGO Posted for qty - 1 ea referring the Purchase order and a material document has been generated.
i. In Display mode of Material Document, in the quantity tab, the amount in local currency is populating as 50.00 GBP.
The following have been tested
1. Cancelled the Material Document
2. Cancelled both the invoices.
3. Cleared FI documents manually.
4. Posted Single invoice for 100.00GBP
5. Posted MIGO- GR- 101 for 1 qty.
6. In material document the value is reflecting as 100.00GBP
Kindly suggest..
1. to get a amount in local currecy asf 100.00GBP in the migo - value of the PO line item, even if 2 invoices exits with different values.
2. User exit to control this.
3. Any other solution.
Regards,
M. Suresh
4. Posted

Dear Suresh
This is a standard behaviour only.
1. when you ost intital invoice for Qty1 and value 70 GBP, then perform GR, the amount in local currency will be shown as 70 GBP with Quantity 1.
2. When you post GR for Quantity 1 after posting two IRs (one with Qty1-70 GBP + second with Qty 1-30 GBP), , the amount shown in local currency will be 100/2 = 50 GBP. System will show as Quantity 1 due for GR.
Always use GR based IR which will not create any issue or Please define the over delivery/under delivery tolerences which will not allow to post more than the PO quantity. Main reason is posting IR mroe than the PO quantity. We can't use userexit for this. This is standard process. If you bypass these controls, will create a inconsistencies.
Warm regards
Ramakrishna.

Processing Multiple Files for more than 100 Receive Location - File Size - 25 MB each file, file type DML

Hi Everybody
Please suggest.
For one of our BizTalk interface, we have around 120 receive locations. We are just moving (*.dml) files from the source to destination without doing any processing.
We receive lots of files in different receive locations and in few cases the file size will be around 25 MB and so while moving these large files, the CPU usage is varying between 10% to 90+% and the time consuming for this single huge file is around
10 to 20 minutes. This solution was already in place and was designed by the previous vendor for moving the files to their clients. Each client has 2 receive locations and they have around 60 clients. Is there any best solution for implementing
this with in BizTalk or outside BizTalk? Please suggest.
I am also looking for how to control the number of files which gets picked from the BizTalk receive location. For example, If we have say 1000 files in receive location and we want to pick at a time only 50 files only (batch of 50) then is it possible?
because currently it is picking all the files available in source location, and one of the process is dropping thousands of files in to the source location, so we want to control the number of files getting picked (or even if we can control to pick the
number of KBs). Please guide us on how we can control the number of files.

Hi Rajeev,
25 MB per file, 1000 files. Certainly you got to revisit the reason for choosing BizTalk.
“the time consuming for this single huge file is around 10 to 20 minutes”
- This is a problem.
You could consider other file transfer options like XCopy or RobotCopy etc if you want to transfer to another local/shared drive. Or you can consider using SSIS
which does comes with many adapters to send to destination system depending on their destination transfer protocol.
But in your case, you have some of the advantages that you get with BizTalk. For your scenario, you have more source systems (more Receive locations), with BizTalk
it’s always easier to manage these configurations, you can easily enable and disable them when a need arise. You can easily configure tracking; configure host instances based on load etc. So you can consider following design for your requirement. This design
would suit you well since you’re not processing the message and just pass it through from source to destination:
Use a custom pipeline component in the Receive Locations which receives the large file.
Stores the received file into disk and creates a small XML metadata message that contains the information about where the large file is stored.
The small XML message is then published into the
message box db
instead of the large file. Let the metadata file also contain the same context properties as the received file.
In the send port, use another custom pipeline component that process the metadata xml file, retrieve the location of the disk where the file is stored, access the file and send it to destination.
Read the following article on this design..
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/180333/Transfer-Large-Files-using-BizTalk-Send-Side
This way you don’t need to publish the whole message into message box DB which would considerably reduce the processing time and utilises host instance to process
more files. This way you can still get the advantages of BizTalk and still process large files.
And regarding your question of restricting the Receive location to handles the number of files from receives location. No it’s not possible.
Regards,
M.R.Ashwin Prabhu
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

The error threshold has been exceeded. The receive location is shutting down

I am doing polling using SQL adapter......For small records polling is succesful......but for large recorde i am getting following error..
The receive location "RcvSqlDataLoc" with URL "" is shutting down. Details:"The error threshold has been exceeded. The receive location is shutting down.".

Hi
You might have resolved this issue, However I would not read all those records in one go! Instead I would read them in batches and pass to BizTalk.
I would use
Scatter and Gather Pattern to distribute the records to multiple orchestration instance for processing and execute them using more than one BizTalk host instance?
If you have already resolved the issue, Then it would be great if you share the solution with us!
HTH,
Naushad Alam (MCC,MCTS,BizTalk Server)
If this is helpful or answers your question - please
mark accordingly!
alamnaushad.wordpress.com|
My new TechNet Wiki
"BizTalk Server: Performance Tuning & Optimization"

In Textedit, how do I copy a hyperlink url, but only copy the link location and not the link text?

Suppose I have a list of hyperlinked internet URL's. I want to extract their Internet addresses -- the link locations -- which are essentially hidden in the link text. Is there any way to select and copy the list of hyperlinks, but only copy the link locations, and not the link text?
For example, with the links:
The White House
Google
One of my previous posts
What I really want to copy are: "http://www.whitehouse.gov/", "http://www.google.com/", and "https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2737556".

I figured out how to do it. First, copy the hyperlinks onto a blank RTF document in TextEdit and save the file.
Second, open the file from within TextEdit, and make sure that the box "Ignore rich text commands" is checked in the open file dialog box. In the open document, the hyperlinks from my example in my first post will look like this:
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf1038\cocoasubrtf360
{\fonttbl\f0\froman\fcharset0 Times-Roman;}
{\colortbl;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green7\blue232;}
{\info
{\author Garald P. Weller}
{\*\copyright Garald P. Weller}}\margl1440\margr1440\vieww20000\viewh14400\viewkind0
\deftab720
\pard\pardeftab720\sa240\ql\qnatural
\f0\fs24 \cf0 \
\pard\pardeftab720\sa240\ql\qnatural
{\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "http://www.whitehouse.gov/"}}{\fldrslt \cf2 \ul \ulc2 The White House}}\
\pard\pardeftab720\sa240\ql\qnatural
{\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "http://www.google.com/"}}{\fldrslt \cf2 \ul \ulc2 Google}}\
\pard\pardeftab720\sa240\ql\qnatural
{\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2737556"}}{\fldrslt \cf2 \ul \ulc2 One of my previous posts}}\
Third, use the Automator function, "Get URLs From Text," to create a service, which I called "Get URLs From Text," that receives text from any window, gets the URLs, and copies the result to the clipboard:
Fourth, select the entire page above, and go to TextEdit > Services to activate the "Get URLs" service.
Fifth, create a new TextEdit document, and paste the result.
The output is exactly what I wanted, the URLs -- i.e., the link locations -- of the three web pages, without the link text.
Another utility that will extract URLs is CopyPaste Pro, which has an innate ability to extract Internet addresses from either web pages or text pages.

Singleton pattern, scheduled receive location and suspended orchestrations

Hello,
In our project we have several orchestrations that are triggered every minute with the Scheduler Adapter (business requirement is near real-time).
Each of these orchestration must have only 1 instance running at the same time, so we have implemented the singleton pattern. We followed a design like this one: https://fehlberg.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/biztalk-singleton-orchestration-design/
But we end up having suspended orchestrations with the error "The instance completed without consuming all of its messages. The instance and its unconsumed messages have been suspended."
I know it's a risk with this pattern. I thought it would happen only when the instance would run in more than 1 min (because the scheduler adapter is sending a file every minute).
But it happens even with some instances running in about 15sec, so there is something I don't understand, here is an example:
Here we can see that the TransferRegion orchestration started at 10:26:00 (which is expected) and failed.
When I open the orchestration debugger, the time is different, the orchestration is shown starting at 10:26:44 (44 sec later):
And the orchestration ended at 10:27:00:453.
The message not consumed that caused the error has been triggered at 10:27:00.
So I understand that the message arrived just after the listen shape but before the orchestration ends, but I don't understand why the orchestration started 44 sec after is was supposed to ...
Any idea? I'm kind of clueless for now ...

So, are these 8 Orchestrations actually processing messages or are they doing some other work every minute or so?
If they're not processing actual messages, maybe a Windows Service or job scheduled by the SQL Agent or Windows Scheduler would be more...appropriate. We all love BizTalk, but some parts of the stack do some things better.
If they are processing messages or doing some genuine BPI type work, calling services, transformations etc., then maybe a Singleton+Scheduled Task is not the best solution.
I'm assuming the actual requirement is the process must run with no less than 1 minute between executions, but if an execution takes >1 min, don't overlap. An internal 1 min timer would probably work very well, but you still have the problem of
activating and deactivating the Orchestration. You'd basically have to build some control infrastructure similar to the EDI Batching Service.
Here's a completely different suggestion:
SQL Table that maintains the state of each process, say Active or Complete.
Poll every 15 seconds a Stored Procedure that tests the status and returns an activation message when that process shows Complete. It would flip it to Active at the same time.
Orchestration runs and the last shape sends a message to change the status to Complete.
Rinse Repeat. No long running Orchestrations, Singletons, Correlations, etc...
Hi John,
We have 8 independent orchestrations. Each of them is triggered by different scheduled receive location.
The orchestrations then process messages (calling stored procedures, mapping and calling web services).
You are right for the requirement. I tried to deactivate the receive location at the beginning of the process and restart it at the end, but I ran into some weird errors on the SSO DB and others like "Could not retrieve transport type data for Receive
Location 'Trigger_xxxxx_SCHEDULE' from config store. The transaction associated with the current connection has completed but has not been disposed. The transaction must be disposed before the connection can be used to execute SQL statements."
Thanks for the new design suggestion, I will see the effort required and if the client approves it ;)

Can not save dashboard after copying to another location

Hi All,
I am moving a dashboard to another location and trying to make some changes but when I click on save button nothing happens, "Saving" text appears, page busy gif appears, thats all. I've waited long enough but no change. This occurs only on one page of the dashboard. The original dashboard page works fine but the copied one is not saving.
Sometimes I get the error;
There was a problem retrieving the response data:Unknown (12030)
Ay idea would help. Thanks.
Ganim

hi,
Use catalog manager to copy from one location to other location
and check in preserve the old item name while copying from one location to other.
Regards,
VG
http://mkashu.blogspot.com

Unable to pick up the file from Receive Location

BizTalk is unable to pick up the files from receive location.
My admin console is working so slow.
It is showing the problem of snap-in as follows:
I have checked all my receive location and its masking,it is working fine.
Actually it is working fine in dev server(snap-in problem is not occuring in dev server ) but when I import MSI and binding in UAT server.
It is not picking up the file from receive location.
I want to know one more thing :if my message box database is not working fine,will it receive the files from receive location.
Prakash

For files not received by receive location. If the Receive Location is still enabled but files are not processed by Receive Location, then check whether the host instance configured with your receive location is running. If the host instance is in
running state, restart the host instance and try.
Regarding the error in the admin console as shown in the image, people started to see this issue with admin console from BizTalk 2009 onwards. This happens in cases like you have done some activity with console and before its been refreshed it you do more
activities like expanding the node you will see this error. Sometimes WMI is bit slowly to refresh your admin console screen. Just wait for few seconds untill the WMI screen is rendered completely. Ensure you have all the cumulative updates installed for your
version of BizTalk and also ensure the service pack for your OS is updated.
Obviously if message box is not working, files will not be received/processed. But if message box is not in healthy state this would affect all other application not just one and in-fact it would affect entire BizTalk not just Receive Locations.
To start analysing this file not been processed by Receive Location, start with checking the host instance as mentioned.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

MIGO Mvt 311 no batch copy to receiving location

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for