MIGO: Po header level condition for excise are 100 times less

Hello,
While MIGO against purchase order
Item level BED condition value is showing as 160 and header level condition value is showing as 1.60
What could be the root cause?
Thanks & Regards

I also come across similar issue in various threads..Let us hope for solution.

Similar Messages

  • There are similar condition for excise duty cess and taxations so which one

    there are similar condition for excise duty cess and taxations so which one to be chosed
    its so confusing there are many condition in excise duty and many condition for cess
    there are also many condition for sales tax vat and others
    so which one to be choose
    can any body help me...
    thanks with regards

    Hi,
    Which Tax procedure u r following,TAXINJ or TAXINN.
    If U are Using TAXINJ.
    <b>ED</b>
    JMOD     IN A/R BED
    JAED     IN: A/R AED
    JSED     IN A/R SED
    JCES     IN A/R CESS
    JEX2     Excise Duty @ 16%(Set off)
    JEXA     IN A/R AED   (Set off)
    JEXS     IN A/R SED (Set off)
    JCED     IN A/R CESS
    JECS     A/R EducationCess
    JECX     Ed. Cess @ 2% on ED(Set off)
    JA1X     A/R Sec & Hr ECS
    JA1Y     A/R Sec & Hr ECS
    <b>Tax</b>
    JIN1     CST
    JIN2     VAT
    Raghu

  • Header level Scales for purchasing

    We have labels that we purchase and our vendor has offered scaled pricing if we combine different materials within the same size.  As an example, I have 4 labels that are all 1" x 4" and my scales are 10,000, 50,000 and 100,000.
    How can I create a header level condition that will combine these 4 different materials to obtain the best pricing?  I've tried condition groups and also tried isolating these 4 materials into a contract, but I still can't find a way to combine this at the header level.
    Thanks in advance for the help
    David Lewis

    hi
    i dont think it is possible
    but try using the varient configuration for diffrent sizes of lable
    here u will have only one material as lable
    if u use varient configuration then u can choose the diffrent price as per the size
    regards
    kunal
    award if helpful

  • Two production  orders at the header level one for one single requirement

    Hi Gurus, Please provide me your valuable suggestion on the issue.
    *Client wants to have a only two production  orders at the header level one for one single requirement .*
    1) Manufacturing Order u2013 In this order for Finsihed prodcut system should pick all the assemblies whcih are manufactured inside i.e depending on the material type.\
    2) Assembly order u2013 In this order system should pick all the assemblies whicih need to be assembled also procured or subcontracted items in this order against depending on the material type.
    It means for Sales order of  5 EA there is going to be only 2 order ( MFG & assy order).
    For Example.
    L45-7000 is the header material now client wants only two production orders one Manufacture order and anothe Assmebly order , thet dont want to use Phantom assembly concept and also multiple production orders for  SFG.
    Please confirm if this requirement can be mapped in SAP ?
    Thanks...

    Hi Shishir,
    As soon as each order is related to only one material, if your manufactured (or purchased) assemblies are of different materials, you will have a separate order for each material rather than a single order for all manufactured assemblies. I don't thing all your assemblies are of the same material - thus I would say no, it is not possible to map your requirement.
    Regards,
    Sergiy

  • Wht are functionality in salesdocument header level ( condition type)

    hi friends
                kindly send functionality in sales document header level , [email protected]
    regards
    shivaji

    The functionality of sales document is as follows
    Transfer of requirements and availabiltiy check
    revenue account determination
    text determination
    pricing functions

  • PO number prints only if it is at header level not for item level

    Hi All,
    I am not able to print the PO number in my order acknowledgement and COA printout when I enter the PO number in the sales order at item level of only. It prints fine when it is at the header level.
    Please assist.
    Thank you,
    Shanu Jain

    Hi,
    BSTKD Field in the VBKD is dependent on two things . IF the Header PO Number is same as the Item number if u change at Header level it will be changed at all items level also. If both are diff then if u change the PO Number at Header level it will change PO numbers of the Items which is having same value as Header Po Number otherwise it wont change the Item PO Number .
    Ex " Order Number 1000 is having PO Number at Header Level is PO1. And the sales order is having Item 010 and 020.
    IF Item 010 and 020 is having PO1 at item level if u change the value of PO1 at header Level if will be applicable to items 010 and 020.
    If Item 010 is having Po Number PO1 and 020 is having PO2, if i change value of PO number at header to PO3 then it will change Item 010 PO Number to PO3 and Item 020 PO Number will be same as PO2.
    Try to Take The VBKD - BSTKD where Item Number POSNR is blank that means Header PO Number .
    IF u want Item Po Number then pass the item number in POSNR and get it.
    Regards,
    Srinivas.

  • Error in entering header level conditional value - toomany line items to PO

    Hi experts
    I have an issue while  processing a PO. While entering condition values like Freight, Customs duty etc in header level where the order contains more than 1000 line items, i am getting an error " too many line items, msg no.899". Can somebody, guide on this how this can be resolved.
    rgds
    Raghu

    HI Raghu,
    The only possible way is to create two diffrent PO's.
    As you have maintain various conditions, this will lead to updation of many FI documents at the time of GRN.
    This is SAP Limitation.
    Regards,
    Amit
    njoy SAP..
    njou Life....

  • Send the email to myself with 4 pictures for more than 100 times --- i didn't do this

    one of my colleages send an email to [email protected], and cc the email to me.
    and my blackberry send the email with 4 pictures in my camera folder to me and joegmail.com for more than 50 times a day.
    Why does it happen? and what should i do for that. please help.

    one of my colleages send an email to [email protected], and cc the email to me.
    and my blackberry send the email with 4 pictures in my camera folder to me and joegmail.com for more than 50 times a day.
    Why does it happen? and what should i do for that. please help.

  • How to add a new field in migo transaction (header level)

    hi guru's
    can you please tell me how to add a field in migo transaction?
    i want to add a field in header data and that too under "general" tab. i dont have data regarding that field.
    and when we enter a value for that field in migo, it has to take .
    thank you.

    Hi, My problem is allmost like the one you are discussing here....
    I have appended MKPF for my Z-fields and created a sub-screen (Design the screen). I am calling this screen in PBO_HEADER. Now i can see my newly created tab along with fields.
    Now the problem is:-
    1. How I can transfer that data entered in screen fields back to my BADI.
    2. How to update my z-fields in MKPF table along with standard fields. I have tried using FM - 'J_1IEXGM_BADI_POST_DOCUMENT' in Method - POST_DOCUMENT, but its not updating table record in MKPF for Z-Fields.
    Please advice.....
    Thanks

  • Problem in setting condition for a period of time for SUMIFS

    Dear fellows,
    I have a list of transactions - column B is a value and column C is a date. I'm using SUMIF to calculate a total value per month. I set the date condition as
    column C;">="&B1;column B;"<="&EOMONTH(B1;0)
    it seems there is a mistake as the formula returns a value with 1 transaction missing (the last day of a month).
    in my example the formula should return 125 instead of 124.
    Please see the screenshot

    Hello
    I'd try:
    "<"&EOMONTH(B$1;0)+1
    instead of:
    "<="&EOMONTH(B$1;0)
    Also check B$1 is date-time value with day = 1.
    * Numbers date value is actually date-time value. If time part is not 00:00:00, comparison could yield unexpected result for edge values.
    Good luck,
    H

  • Download Header using GUI_DOWNLOAD for more than 100 fields

    Hi,
    I want to download data with header from a database table using the FM 'GUI_DOWNLOAD'.
    I know that this can be achieved by
    1. Download headers first to an internal table and call FM ' GUI_DOWNLOAD" 
    2. then Download data to the same file by calling FM 'GUI_DOWNLOAD' with APPEND = 'X'
    But my database table has more than 100 fields, pls tell me how to download all the fields as header information.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    This can be done using the FM GUI_DOWNLOAD.
    Store all the field names in a internal table, pass the internal table to FIELDNAMES component of the FM. This will download the internal table with headings.
    Note - To download it as excel, pass FILETYPE as 'DAT'.
    Regards,
    Vinod

  • Excise getting calculated on header level

    Dear All ,
    When I make PO for 2 items with same vendor one with Excise and other is without excise , system calculates excise for both the items on header level . But ideally it must be for one item which is applicalbe for Excise . Please guide
    Detailed issue :
    We have created the PO with 2 line items
    1) with Excise Duty : Material Number entered in PO . Correct Excise Duty Determined automatically through the conndintion record. Condition record is maintained on the basis of Country / Plant/ Control Code . . Control Code is maintained in Material Master .
    2) Without Excise : No material Number is entered in PO. There is no excise applicable for the item . Only CST is applicable with Net value .
    Issue : System calculates the excise for line 2 , even though excise is not applicable for the item . We checked in the analysis system picks up control code and condition record from line item 1 . We did not found any relation why system calculates the excise duty. There is no material Num for line item 2   & also there is no control code .
    A )When we save that PO and opened it again and see line item 2 taxes details System do not show the Excise and only shows CST , which is correct .
    B) But when we see the Taxes details of item 1 system shows all excise duty and CST , which is correct .
    C) Again when we go on item num 2 system shows excise duty , which is not correct . Ideally system must show the CST only. As described in  point A .
    Why system calculate the Excise Duty on line item 2 without any relation and there is no such condition record maintained .
    Also we checked the conditions properties in Customising . Excise conditions are at item level only.  Item level Check box is Ticked . There is no check mark on header level.
    For excise determination we maintained the condition record at Country +Plant + Control Code level
    For line item 2 there is no relation of control code as there is no material master record and so that no control code . Even though the system picks the excise .
    Edited by: Bhushan Bivalkar on Mar 25, 2009 4:25 PM

    Bit interesting!
    Check in FV13 for condtion once again do we hav maintanined the condition at Tax classification level for the conditions on which system is calculating tax on non taxable material. as we use to do it for assiging the tax procedure to country and it will overright all codition master.
    if that is not the case then try with diffrent tax code for both the line item and then check to tax. and at the the of GR chcek what system do. or make two different GRs as we need the excise invoice recod for excisable materila only.
    Rgds
    S

  • Condition Currency at Header Level

    Hi,
    Using SRM 7.0, SP09, ECS.
    We are unable to change the Conditions Curency for Header Level Conditions while creating RFx Response. Is it standard behaviour?
    Note: It is working fine with item level conditions.
    Ganapathi

    Hi,
    Someone who is using conditions in RFx/RFx Response kindl check and reply.
    In RFx, before publishing add more than 1 currency in Bidder's tab page. In Response, go to condition tab page...
    add a condition at item level for which calulation type is not %. You will get a box to select reqired currency....
    add a condition at header level for which calculation type is not %. You don't get any option to selectu currency. The field is grayed out.....Is it so in your system?
    Ganapathi

  • Condition at Header Level

    Dear all,
    Following is my requirement.
    My condition (ZPPV)is at  both header& item level (In M/06, header & item level condition check boxes are ticked).
    My client requirement is if at header level, I enter  condition amount say $ 50 & that perticular purchase order is having 7 line items, $50 should get equally divided to each line item i.e.( 50/7= $7.14).
    Please tell me which setting should I do for it?
    Best Regards,
    Shailendra
    Edited by: Shailendra Sabale on Jun 15, 2010 4:03 PM

    Hi,
    In M/06 you select the group condition indicator for your condition type.
    Cheers,
    Satish Purandare

  • Clear IDOC creation when only header level changes are made ME22N.

    Hi All,
    when the PO is  on changed in the header level only(for example header texts and header code)  and when we execute RSNAST00 one BADI getts triggered which checks if the Item category is 9 and  badi will clear the IDOC creation.
      If the PO item category is = 9, the IDOC must not be created. This badi works fine if the changes are made at
    1)at Item level
    2)both header level and Item level
    In case of 1 and 2 we have both header segment E1EDK01 and item segments E1EDP01.As a result it checks for the item category in the item segment.so idoc is not created.
    3)BADI is not working when the changes are made at the header level only. The IDOC is getting created even though the PO has the item category as 9.
    I found in this case only header segments are availble while debugging and the item segments are not there to check the condition for the item category.
    Please any one can suggest me possible solutions to  clear idoc creation when only header level changes are made ME22N.
    The BADI used is as below.
      DATA : lwa_data TYPE edidd.
      DATA : lw_dp01 TYPE e1edp01.
      DATA : lwa_control TYPE edidc.
      CHECK idoc_control-rcvprn = '3PL' AND idoc_control-idoctp = 'ORDERS05'.
      LOOP AT idoc_data INTO lwa_data.
        IF lwa_data-segnam = 'E1EDP01'.
          lw_dp01 = lwa_data-sdata.
          IF lw_dp01-pstyp = '9'.
            CLEAR create_idoc.
          ENDIF.
        ENDIF.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDMETHO
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi all,
    Is there  any way that I can get the item category details when Only header level changes are made to the PO in ME22N and only header segments are available in the IDOC.
    Is this possible:- Fetch the po number and item category details from ekpo table that matches with  the header segment po number and then check for item category value  to clear the idoc creation?
    Any information is helpfull.
    Edited by: Selina.selk on Nov 20, 2009 1:39 PM
    Edited by: Selina.selk on Nov 20, 2009 2:49 PM

Maybe you are looking for