MIRO CST calculating doubled

Dear all,
                    MIRO transactions CST condition calculating doubled, IN po i have maintained 2% cst,
Say Example Price 100, Cst 2%= 2 Rs
Here cst amount it wont add to the material cost. This is project based industry so this cst amount it will go to the Separate Account. Miro while i am simulating my entries are
Vendor Cr            103
GR/IR            Dr       100
Sales TAx    Dr           2
SAles TAx    Dr          4
Here Sales tax 4 Rs coming from Where i dont know. TAXINN procedure we are using here. FV12 i have checked the condiions. i am not maintained anything in fv12.
Pls help me how to overcome this one.

Dear jeyakandan,
I am not maintained any tax rates and all.
1100009523 Foundation Bolts M76,80MM(D)X3150MM(L) 2.000 % A 25.02.2010 31.12.2010 2A
Pls help me to close this issue. any other clue boss.

Similar Messages

Excise Secondary Education Cess is calculating Double in MIGO

Hi All,
Excise Secondary Education Cess is calculating Double in MIGO
In PO it is showing SEcess is 3.20 Rs in Tax procedure But while in Goods Receipt it is showing 6.40 Rs ( Double )
If it is posted in J1IEX it is taking 3.20 Rs
Please help ,,,,,,
Manjunath

HI,
Might be in your pricing procedure having same condition in 2 times check it once. otherwise u have entered the value in 2 times in your purchase order.
Edited by: anjali.p on Aug 22, 2011 1:36 PM

Base Value change for CST calculation

Hi,
I've a requirement that CST should get calculated on an assessible value and not on Net Price in the PO. e.g.
Basic Price: 100
BED@10%: 10
ECess@2%: 2
SHECess@1%: 1
Subtotal 1: 113
Assessible Value for CST: 90
CST@4%: 3.60
Total: 116.60
How can we change base value for CST calculation in Tax Procedure?
We are using Tax Procedure TAXINN.
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
Manoj

Hi All,
I got the solution for my issue so closing the thread.
I changed the Tax procedure.Add two new condition types, one for Assesseble value for CST calculation and another one which is a copy of JVCS(CST condition).In case when no assesseble value is maintained, new condition type for CST will be zero.
Regards.
Manoj

/102 u2013 401K wagetype calculated double when two hourly rates used in it0008

Dear Experts,
I have got an issue. Employee has been paid with two different hourly rates within a pay period in IT0008
i.e. For example: 01-sept-2011 to 14-sept-2011 is a payroll period in that 1-sept-2011 to 8-sept-2011 one entry created in IT0008 and another entry created from 09-Sept-2011 to 31-Dec-9999.
Now when the payroll ran for the employee in that pay period, /102 u2013 401K wage base amount calculated double amount in the RT. In all other payroll periods it is working fine.
Could you please tell me the reason why /102 wage type calculating double amount when two hourly rates mentioned in a pay period. Also please suggest the solution to fix this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Sreenivas.

It is happening because there is 2 splits caused by in IT0008.
I do not know your schema but with processing classes or with pcr you have to manage it.
Why do you have 2 records in it0008
For example if in first split he has worked 8 days and his basic pay is 3000 and in second split he has worked 6 days and his basic pay is 6000 then payroll schema has to calculate basic pay like this:
(3000/30)*8 = 800
(6000/30)*6= 1200 so totally it should be 2000 totally.
You can show it as 800 and 1200 seperately or totally in payroll.
But as I have said it will be calculated according to the pcr and schema
Regards;
Okan

/102 u2013 401K wagetype calculated double amount when two hourly rates used

Dear Experts,
I have got an issue. Employee has been paid (us payroll) with two different hourly rates within a pay period in IT0008
i.e. For example: 01-sept-2011 to 14-sept-2011 is a payroll period in that 1-sept-2011 to 8-sept-2011 one entry created in IT0008 and another entry created from 09-Sept-2011 to 31-Dec-9999.
Now when the payroll ran for the employee in that pay period, /102 u2013 401K wage base amount calculated double amount in the RT. In all other payroll periods it is working fine.
Could you please tell me the reason why /102 wage type calculating double amount when two hourly rates mentioned in a pay period. Also please suggest the solution to fix this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Sreenivas.

Hi,
For few Union Deduction wts, following are the relevant PCRs found. Processing Class 76 is blank for Union deduction wts.
PCR - ZA00
Recurring payments/deductions and supple
    VWTCL 76   Processing class
        VAKEYPAYTY Payroll Type
            GCY ZCLM   With exact w.types
          A
          B
      1
        VAKEYPAYTY Payroll Type
          A
            GCY U111   With exact w.types
          B
PCR - ZCLM
      WGTYP?     Query wage type
          GCY U111   With exact w.types
6606
    NUM= ANZHL Set
    ADDWT *    OT   Output table
6608
    GCY ZUNN   With exact w.types
6609
    NUM=1.0    Set
    ADDWT *    OT   Output table
PCR - ZUNN
    AMT=& REGR Set
    NUM=& REGR Set
    DIVID ANR Division amt/no/rate
    NUM=2.5    Set
    MULTI RNA Multipl.amt/no/rate
    ROUNDG 100 Round AMT to next
    ADDWT&ZUNI VAR Variable table
    VAKEYZEINH Time unit in v.key
        VWTCL 47   Processing class
            VWTCL 10   Processing class
                OPIND      Operation indicator
                ELIMI A    Elim.time period ID
                WPBPC      for all WPBP
              0
                OPIND      Operation indicator
                ADDWT *    OT   Output table
Regards,
Sreenivas

Withholding tax not calculating in MIRO and calculating in F-43

Hi,
Whenever I am positng invoice thru F-43, Calculating withholding tax amount and generating seperate line item for that.
But for same vendor after posting MM cycle( PO - GR -MIRO) and I am posting Invoice thru MIRO WHT line item not generating while simulating and also after posting.
Checks done :
1. In vendor master data Liable check box is ticked and Tax codes are properly maintained.
2. Minimun and maximum amounts checked.
3.Base amounts checked.
4. Formula for WHT checked
5. I feel if these setting are not good,it should not post in F-43 also. But it is posting in F-43.
Kinldy tell me any specific setting for calculating the WHT thru transaction MIRO
Thanks in advance

Shankar,
Thanks for reply.
If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E SP 22 to 4.7 E SP30.
My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
If any suitable answer appreciatable.
Thanks once again for your reply.

MIRO. Add double posting when system posts Cost differences ( PRD trx )

Hi gurus.
I think this question is very difficult.
My user wants to add double posting when the system posts costs differences.
With this example I think the question will be more clear.
Example:
Actual financial document of invoice with costs differences ( PRD ):
103644 ( vendor )   -30.000 u20AC
400900                     47.000 u20AC
610020                    -13.000 u20AC    ( Cost differences account )
In this case, my user wants to add this:
103644 ( vendor )   -30.000 u20AC
400900                     47.000 u20AC
610020                    -13.000 u20AC    ( Cost differences account )
300190                      13.000u20AC
300080                    -13.000u20AC
There are any OBYC transacition to do this?? or there are any add-in or user-exit to add accounts in MIRO trx??
Thanks.

Pls clarify on the process and what are these other G/Ls you are mentioning.
But apart from that if you want any random accounts to be hit depending on the document in question at the time of invoice, than you may activate manual entry into G/Ls in MIRO and than manually give the 2 accounts with debit/credit entries and it should work fine.
Regards,
Dakshesh

CST calculation

Hi Gurus,
I am working on taxinn procedure,
In my material master i have condition type JIVC, JIVP, JSVD, JEC3.And in my customer master also same conditions JIVC, JIVP, JSVD, JEC3
And my Access sequence for JIVC (CST) is as: Country/PlntRegion/TaxCl1Cust/TaxCl.Mat - Interstate
And my Access sequence for JIVP (VAT) is as: Country/PlntRegion/Region/TaxCl2Cust/TaxCl.2Mat.
In material tax classification has rates 1%,2% ect which is common for both JIVC and JIVP. I am facing a problem while maintaining the condition records for the same.
So please guide me how to do this?
Pls tell me how can i create condition record for CST Plant region/tax classcust/tax class mat ,As cst is between two states,also If i create records for cst and vat conditions ,While creating cst scenario both cst and vat is flowing.
Consultants who have faced similar issues pls suggest the solution.
Regards,
Shruthi S

Shruthi,
1.Maintain master record from where the data is flowing
IMG --> SD --> BF --> Taxes --> Define ta relevancy of master Records, wherein you maintain Customer taxes as well as material taxes.
ZVAT (0,1)and ZCST (1, 2) will be maintained in both the master records
Check whether both VAT and CST values explained above are maintained in respective master records views.
2. calculation view
                              Cust. master Tax fields                 Mat. mast Tax field
ZVAT                                     0                                               0                      = 0%
ZVAT                                     1                                               1                      = 4%
ZCST                                     0                                               0                    =   0%
ZCST W/o Form                    2                                               1                     = 10%
ZCST with form C                   2                                               2                     = 3%
3. Maintain condition type
Country/Plant/Region/Tax Classfi cust1/Tax classfication material
Region 01 = TN (within state)               - IN / XXXX / 01/1/1 = 4%
Region 02 =KT (outside the state)        - IN / XXXX / 02/2/1 = 10%
                                                           IN / XXXX / 02/2/2 = 3%
That's it
Regards
Sathya

For add vat in gujrat while SIMULATION IN MIRO wrong calculation

HI FRIENDS ,
I HAVE A SERIOUS ISSUE
Recently Additonal Vat was introduced in gujarat.
Additional vat is calculated on, total value of the amount.
A new condition type for additional vat is created.
We have the following scenario
Total PO Value Rs. 10000
Vat: 4% - Rs. 400
Additonal Vat 1% - Rs. 100
Total PO Value: Rs. 10500
In normal circumstances the entries will be as follows:
When MIGO is done:
Stock A/c Dr 10000
GR/IR 10000
When MIRO is done:
Vendor A/c 10500
GR/IR: 10000
Vat: 400
Add Vat 100
This scenario is running correctly in normal circumstances. However when the excise is included in rate we get the following entries
PO: Rate: Rs. 10000 (Excise of Rs. 200 includes in rate)
Vat: Rs. 400
Additional Vat Rs 100
Total PO Value: 10500
When MIGO is done: - here we tick the mrp indicator
Stock A/c dr. 9800
GR/IR 9800
When J1iex is done
Cenvat input 200
to cenvat clearing 200
When MIRO is done
Vendor: Rs. 10500
GR/IR: 9800
Cenvat clearing 200
Vat: Rs. 400
Additional Vat: Rs. 98   ( Should be Rs. 100)
Scenario is working perfectly if there is no excise or excise is extra, problem only comes when excise is including in the rate.
We had raised an OSS with SAP. They have given us an user Exit ' J_1I17_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV'
how to work with this erxit they told us to redetrmine the additional vat here & its to be called after the fn mod : j_1i4_tax_conditions .they r the part of the class cl_im_india_tax_conditions
KINDLY ANY BODY HELP ME WITH DETAILED STEPS
                                         thanks in advance
REGARDS
digvijay rai

HI FRIENDS ,
I HAVE A SERIOUS ISSUE
Recently Additonal Vat was introduced in gujarat.
Additional vat is calculated on, total value of the amount.
A new condition type for additional vat is created.
We have the following scenario
Total PO Value Rs. 10000
Vat: 4% - Rs. 400
Additonal Vat 1% - Rs. 100
Total PO Value: Rs. 10500
In normal circumstances the entries will be as follows:
When MIGO is done:
Stock A/c Dr 10000
GR/IR 10000
When MIRO is done:
Vendor A/c 10500
GR/IR: 10000
Vat: 400
Add Vat 100
This scenario is running correctly in normal circumstances. However when the excise is included in rate we get the following entries
PO: Rate: Rs. 10000 (Excise of Rs. 200 includes in rate)
Vat: Rs. 400
Additional Vat Rs 100
Total PO Value: 10500
When MIGO is done: - here we tick the mrp indicator
Stock A/c dr. 9800
GR/IR 9800
When J1iex is done
Cenvat input 200
to cenvat clearing 200
When MIRO is done
Vendor: Rs. 10500
GR/IR: 9800
Cenvat clearing 200
Vat: Rs. 400
Additional Vat: Rs. 98   ( Should be Rs. 100)
Scenario is working perfectly if there is no excise or excise is extra, problem only comes when excise is including in the rate.
We had raised an OSS with SAP. They have given us an user Exit ' J_1I17_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV'
how to work with this erxit they told us to redetrmine the additional vat here & its to be called after the fn mod : j_1i4_tax_conditions .they r the part of the class cl_im_india_tax_conditions
KINDLY ANY BODY HELP ME WITH DETAILED STEPS
                                         thanks in advance
REGARDS
digvijay rai

Calculating double from String

Hello again
I just have a quick question here, that confused me a bit (though I guess it makes sense)
If I try to print the double 1 + 2 * 3, it will output 7.
But I have a JTextField with the string 1 + 2 * 3, and I try to parse it as a double, it won't let me.
Am I doing something since it doesn't work? To me it seems logic that it should be able to parse a string as a double, if it can calculate the double without a problem.
Do you have any ideas?
Any help here is appreciated
Thanks in advance
Ulverbeast
Edited by: Ulverbeast on Feb 25, 2010 1:07 PM

Ulverbeast wrote:
But in the second example it tries to parse the whole string as a double?As far as Java is concerned, a string is just a bunch of characters. Java doesn't know that this particular string happens to be a mathematical expression that could be evaluated.
If you want to evaluate a string as a mathematical expression you can do that out-of-the-box if you are using Java 6, through the new ScriptEngine functionality. Java 6 ships with a script engine that can evaluate JavaScript, so in this case you could do:
import javax.script.*;
public class EvalExample {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        ScriptEngineManager mgr = new ScriptEngineManager();
        ScriptEngine jsEngine = mgr.getEngineByName("JavaScript");
        try {
          Double result = (Double) jsEngine.eval("1 + 2 * 3");
          System.out.println(result);
        } catch (ScriptException ex) {
          ex.printStackTrace();
}(Note that the cast to Double will fail if the expression you evaluate does not result in a number.)
Edited by: Torgil on Feb 25, 2010 8:12 PM: Figured I should make the example an SSCCE :)

Asset po vat calculation problem in MIRO

Hi
when user create asset po ,do MIGO ( GRN is nonvaluvated) and then MIRO
while simulating miro,vat not flowing correctly as in po value its differnt from Po value
BUT,..
When i remove GR base tick from Po and do,MIGO and MIRO,its calculating correctly
why so,any solution ,
Regards
Kailas ugale

Hi sir,
Check account assignment - 'A' settings 'GR non valuated' is not ticked ?
YES its ticked
Whether any excise calculations were involved before VAT
No excise
Regards
Kailas ugale

Condition type before CST/VAT calculation

Dear Friends ,
Is it possible to create a condition type which will get added only after excise duty calculation but before CST calculation.
If its possible kindly tell me how to go about it.
Regards,
DGN

Hi,
you will have to add an additional condition type in TAXINN procedure as "Freight Before Vat" , mantain it as statistical as it is only for calculation. and mantain FV11 for the same.
Further The same freight amount will also have to be entered in the PO pricing Procedure for Inventorization , payment etc.
first you have to make a tax condition type , make 2 , one as Value adn other percentage based. assign it to your tax procedure in steps which are before subtotaos: "Total excsie duty +cess" and "base for sales tax" , make sure to change the "to" part of base for sales tax .also make sure to tick these new conditions as statistical .Mantain FV11 for the Freight conditions.
The above config will only help you in calculating Correct Vat , this has nothing to do with PO pricing procedure. Freight will have to be entered in PO Pricing procedure normally as well.
Regards,
Vikas

Trackpad "Double Clicks" on Dashboard Calculator

This is stressing me out to no end. Ever since I upgraded to Mountain Lion, my dashboard calculator double enters every digit I click. I haven't had this issue anywhere else but the default calculator on the dashboard. I can see from the rest of the threads I've read that it is to do with the software development. Has anyone found a solution for this problem? Every thread I read went dead before any solution came about (way too much rhyming in that sentence). I will note that if I "right click" the buttons on the calculator or enter them through my keyboard, it works fine. Please someone tell me I can fix this - I use it all the time!

Hi Jeff,
I have the exact same problem. Were you able to solve it? I also see weird behaviour in mail which has a lag of a click. If I click on one message the click doesnt register, then I click on another and the previous message click registers. Very annoying.
I went to apple and they set up a new user for me. It does not happen with this new user so it could be something to do with preferences, but noone seems to know which.
The Apple Genius suggested to either backup/swipe and then manually pull all my data back (not a full restore since that would likely re-instate the same problem) or to manually move my data from one user to the other.
Both of these options would be very time consuming so I am hoping there is another way.
I am very careful with what I install on my mac, I have very few apps installed.
Any help would be appreciated.
Best regards,
Bobby

MIRO problem for Second Stage dealer scenario

Hi All,
I have created a purchase order to the trader in which i have taken Inclusive of excise tax code.
Now while doing MIGO i have make a tick to MRP indicator also change the base value in excise tab & fill the fields of BED, ECS & HECS whatever vendor has pass on to me & post the document.
Now in MIRO also i have change the base value & simulate the document where the extra G/L of Inventory is appearing.
That amount is 2 % i.e. CST on GR/IR clearing amount of MIGO.
Because of that 2% amount less credited to vendor account.
Please help to resolve the issue.
Regards,
Nandkishor Nachane

Hi,
Since you are choosing the correct tax code @ the time of MIRO, the actual CST calculation is happening at the time of MIRO. Hence it will get posted to the inventory. Please check your MIGO/GR postings. I hope there wont be any CST calculation during GR since you have mentioned a dummy tax code in your PO.
Hope its clear.
As per my understanding the system behaviour is correct.
Thanks & Regards,

Mid month action_Pension (/3f4) calculation wrong

Hi All,
I get one problem , when payroll run for employee, whose action run in the mid of the month. for ex. 15.05.2010(Transfer action)
In that case the pension amount (/3f4) is calculating double or more than 541...which is wrong.
Kindly provde the input to resolve the same....
Regards,
Mahesh
Edited by: Mahesh Shewale on Sep 1, 2010 1:08 PM
Edited by: Mahesh Shewale on Sep 2, 2010 7:18 AM

Hi Mahesh,
Please make changes in User exit provided as per your requirement and then check the results
There are 2 user exit
EXIT_HINCALC0_002 for pension basis.
EXIT_HINCALC0_007

MIRO CST calculating doubled

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for