/102 u2013 401K wagetype calculated double amount when two hourly rates used

Dear Experts,
I have got an issue. Employee has been paid (us payroll) with two different hourly rates within a pay period in IT0008
i.e. For example: 01-sept-2011 to 14-sept-2011 is a payroll period in that 1-sept-2011 to 8-sept-2011 one entry created in IT0008 and another entry created from 09-Sept-2011 to 31-Dec-9999.
Now when the payroll ran for the employee in that pay period, /102 u2013 401K wage base amount calculated double amount in the RT. In all other payroll periods it is working fine.
Could you please tell me the reason why /102 wage type calculating double amount when two hourly rates mentioned in a pay period. Also please suggest the solution to fix this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Sreenivas.

Hi,
For few Union Deduction wts, following are the relevant PCRs found. Processing Class 76 is blank for Union deduction wts.
PCR - ZA00
Recurring payments/deductions and supple
    VWTCL 76   Processing class
        VAKEYPAYTY Payroll Type
            GCY ZCLM   With exact w.types
          A
          B
      1
        VAKEYPAYTY Payroll Type
          A
            GCY U111   With exact w.types
          B
PCR - ZCLM
      WGTYP?     Query wage type
          GCY U111   With exact w.types
6606
    NUM= ANZHL Set
    ADDWT *    OT   Output table
6608
    GCY ZUNN   With exact w.types
6609
    NUM=1.0    Set
    ADDWT *    OT   Output table
PCR - ZUNN
    AMT=& REGR Set
    NUM=& REGR Set
    DIVID ANR Division amt/no/rate
    NUM=2.5    Set
    MULTI RNA Multipl.amt/no/rate
    ROUNDG 100 Round AMT to next
    ADDWT&ZUNI VAR Variable table
    VAKEYZEINH Time unit in v.key
        VWTCL 47   Processing class
            VWTCL 10   Processing class
                OPIND      Operation indicator
                ELIMI A    Elim.time period ID
                WPBPC      for all WPBP
              0
                OPIND      Operation indicator
                ADDWT *    OT   Output table
Regards,
Sreenivas

Similar Messages

/102 u2013 401K wagetype calculated double when two hourly rates used in it0008

Dear Experts,
I have got an issue. Employee has been paid with two different hourly rates within a pay period in IT0008
i.e. For example: 01-sept-2011 to 14-sept-2011 is a payroll period in that 1-sept-2011 to 8-sept-2011 one entry created in IT0008 and another entry created from 09-Sept-2011 to 31-Dec-9999.
Now when the payroll ran for the employee in that pay period, /102 u2013 401K wage base amount calculated double amount in the RT. In all other payroll periods it is working fine.
Could you please tell me the reason why /102 wage type calculating double amount when two hourly rates mentioned in a pay period. Also please suggest the solution to fix this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Sreenivas.

It is happening because there is 2 splits caused by in IT0008.
I do not know your schema but with processing classes or with pcr you have to manage it.
Why do you have 2 records in it0008
For example if in first split he has worked 8 days and his basic pay is 3000 and in second split he has worked 6 days and his basic pay is 6000 then payroll schema has to calculate basic pay like this:
(3000/30)*8 = 800
(6000/30)*6= 1200 so totally it should be 2000 totally.
You can show it as 800 and 1200 seperately or totally in payroll.
But as I have said it will be calculated according to the pcr and schema
Regards;
Okan

Timing problem when doing hourly rate

Note:
There are two problems:
1)Usually each passed test takes more than 1 minute, thus incrementing Track no. But what if the 2nd failed test completes in less than 1 minute, track no cannot be incremented, leading to wrong result in hourly rate.
2) For hourly rate, it needs to be calculated after each hour. The problem if the test lapses more than one minute, the same minute skips,
Therefore, hourly rate cannot be calculated at each hour. Using more than or less than function won't work as the hourly rate will be calculated twice or more in each hour.
See the red box in the bloick diagram
See my attached.
I am using Labview 7.1
Pls advise I will grateful to your generous help
Attachments:
timing.vi ‏108 KB

Hi Englund,
Thanks
Ya I know. I am trying to test whether the function is working for my main program and test machine. Sometimes, in case of of failed test, the whole test will take less than 1 minute to complete. For the passed test, of course the teat machine will continue to test on more stages. But when the test fails in first or earlier stages, the track number cannot be incremented.
What's more I want the to calculate the hourly rate, so if it misses 60 minute mark, Hourly rate won't be calculated. I can use the equal sign but the minute tracker cannot possibly detect every minute becos the test takes 1 minute, more or less, missing the mark.
I have checked the function (wait until next ms multiple) as u suggest and found that this is not function I am looking for.
If you think that I missed out. Maybe post your small example on how it works.
Clement

Calculation of interest amount with two variables formula

Hello everyone,
Iu2019m facing a problem with the way that TRM calculate the interest amount for money market transaction when I have a formula with two variable, e.g. reference interest rate u201CXu201D multiplied by 0,98.
Some contracts explicitly say that to obtain the u201Cdaily interest rateu201D of the contract firstly the u201Cdaily interest rateu201D of the reference interest rate must be calculated and then apply a index or factor (e.g. 0,98). In the other hand some contracts says that it should be done the other way around. Iu2019ve noticed that TRM calculate the interest amount using the first way.
Is there any way to set which the way the interest amount should be calculates?
Has anyone faced similar problem?
The examples below illustrate the difference in the two ways to calculate interest amount.
Considering the following money market transaction:
1. Borrowing structure:
1.1. amount: USD 1.000.000,00
1.2. flow type: 1105 u201CBorrowing/Increaseu201D
2. Term (only one day to simplify the example)
2.1. Start date: 30.01.2011
2.2. End data: 31.01.2011
3. Interest structure:
3.1. Interest form: VARIABLE ( formula = Z1 * 0,98), where u201CZ1u201D is a reference interest rate
3.2. condition type: 1200 u201CNominal interestu201D
3.3. Interest calculation method: ActW/252
Considering that Z1u2019s annual interest rate in 30.01.2011 is 11,66%, TRM would perform the following calculation:
1. Contract annual interest rate (%) = Z1*0,98 = 11,66 *0,98 = 11,42680000%
2. Convert from u201CContract annual interest rate (%)u201D to number = 1,11426800
3. u201CContract daily interest rateu201D = 1,11426800 ^(1/252) = 1,00042945
4. Convert from u201Cnumberu201D to Day interest rate (%) = 0,04294481%
5. Interest amount = u201CContract daily interest rateu201D * Borrowed amount = 0,04294481% * 10.000.000,00 = 4.294,48
In the other hand, some contracts say that the interest rate should be calculated in the following way:
1. Annual interest rate (%) = 11,66 = 11,66000000%
2. Convert from u201CAnnual interest rate (%)u201D to number = 1,11660000
3. Daily interest rate = 1,11660000 ^(1/252) = 1,00043775
4. Convert from u201Cnumberu201D to Daily interest rate (%) = 0,04377480%
5. Calculate u201CContract daily interest rateu201D = 0,04377480% * 0,98 = 0,04289930%
5. Interest amount = u201CContract daily interest rate (%)u201D * Borrowed amount = 0,04289930% * 10.000.000,00 = 4.289,93
With this simple scenario we end up with a USD 4,55 difference for a single day, but for big contracts of hundred millions and for several years the difference is quite huge.
Thanks in advance ..
Giuliano

Hi,
with Product Category 550 you can have both scenarios:
for the 1st case you can use a formular (e.g. EONIA * 0,98)
=> interest for 1 day: 462,70 EUR
for the 2nd case you can use the field Variable Interest Rate (EONIA) + field Payment Rate (98)
=> interest for 1 day: 453,44 EUR
Is this, what you are looking for?
Regards,
Lorenz

MIRO CST calculating doubled

Dear all,
                    MIRO transactions CST condition calculating doubled, IN po i have maintained 2% cst,
Say Example Price 100, Cst 2%= 2 Rs
Here cst amount it wont add to the material cost. This is project based industry so this cst amount it will go to the Separate Account. Miro while i am simulating my entries are
Vendor Cr            103
GR/IR            Dr       100
Sales TAx    Dr           2
SAles TAx    Dr          4
Here Sales tax 4 Rs coming from Where i dont know. TAXINN procedure we are using here. FV12 i have checked the condiions. i am not maintained anything in fv12.
Pls help me how to overcome this one.

Dear jeyakandan,
                                I am not maintained any tax rates and all.
1100009523          Foundation Bolts M76,80MM(D)X3150MM(L)          2.000      %                    A          25.02.2010     31.12.2010     2A
Pls help me to close this issue. any other clue boss.

Invoice tax amount is not equal to the calculated tax amount

Hi All,
I'm importing AP invoices through Open Interface R12.
Lines includes Tax lines as well. But Invoices become held when I try to validate.
I'm getting this hold reason: "Invoice tax amount is not equal to the calculated tax amount"
Can anybody advise please ?
Thanks,

Use T. code SM30 and give table name J_1IT030K_V and click on maintain button give your chart of account, press enter here assign appropriate G/L A/C against Tax code MK.

When I open up iphoto and click on the events tab then double click on an event, it used to show minis of all the photos in that event. Now it shows only one photo at a time. How do I get it back? Can you help?

When I open up iphoto and click on the events tab then double click on an event, it used to show minis of all the photos in that event. Now it shows only one photo at a time. How do I get it back? Can you help?

On the bottom bar of the window (on the left iPhoto 11, on the right in other versions) note the slider. Drag it left.
Regards
TD

Calculation of Amount in LC value at the time of MIGO (Movement 101 )

Dear Gurus,
Kindly give me the logic for calculation of 'Amount of LC' value at GRN against Purchase Order using t-code MIGO.
Also let me know how this value gets chnaged with below mentioned parameters:-
1. Assesable base Value- Excise Tab MIGO
2. Exicse Value
3. tax code in PO
Regards
Soumen Das

closed

Oracle 9i - Calculating Total Amount of Space Available/Used by Tablespace

OK, so here is my situation....
I'm on Oracle 9i on a Windows 2000 Server. Windows has a file size restriction of 16 gig. So when you setup datafiles to auto-extend to unlimited, the max it will extend to is 16 gig.
I have all of my datafiles setup to auto-extend, but I want to write a query that will show me for each tablespace, the amount of data currently being used, and the maxium amount that the tablespace could extend to. That way I have a tool to see when I might need to add another datafile, before it blows up....
Does anyone has a suggestion on how to do this....

Hi,
Question #1 -- When you set it to UNLIMITED, it assigns the MAX FILE SIZE to 16 gig so Oracle must know the operating system limitation.When you set it to unlimited it will extend upto 32 GB.
Question #2 -- I guess what I'm looking for is how much room is available for additional objects in that particular tablespace. So I guess you could come up with amount used by finding out Max Available - Free Space = Amount UsedSeT lines 300
SET verify OFF
SET pages 40
COLUMN pct_used format 999.99 heading "%|Used"
COLUMN pct_free format 999.99 heading "%|Free"
COLUMN NAME format a16 heading "Tablespace Name"
COLUMN mbytes format 999,999,999.99 heading "Total|MB"
COLUMN used format 999,999,999.99 heading "Used|MB"
COLUMN free format 999,999,999.99 heading "Free|MB"
COLUMN largest format 999,999,999.99 heading "Largest"
BREAK ON report
COMPUTE SUM OF mbytes ON report
COMPUTE SUM OF free ON report
COMPUTE SUM OF used ON report
-- PROMPT ORDER BY:
-- PROMPT 1:TABLESPACE NAME
-- PROMPT 2:total mbytes
-- PROMPT 3:used Mb
-- PROMPT 4:free mb
-- PROMPT 5:% used
-- PROMPT 6:% free
-- define orderby=5 desc
SELECT NVL (b.tablespace_name, NVL (a.tablespace_name, 'UNKOWN')) NAME,
mbytes_alloc mbytes, mbytes_alloc - NVL (mbytes_free, 0) used,
NVL (mbytes_free, 0) free,
((mbytes_alloc - NVL (mbytes_free, 0)) / mbytes_alloc)
* 100 pct_used,
100
- (((mbytes_alloc - NVL (mbytes_free, 0)) / mbytes_alloc) * 100)
pct_free
FROM (SELECT SUM(BYTES) / 1024 / 1024 mbytes_free, tablespace_name
FROM SYS.dba_free_space
GROUP BY tablespace_name) a,
(SELECT SUM(BYTES) / 1024 / 1024 mbytes_alloc, tablespace_name
FROM SYS.dba_data_files
GROUP BY tablespace_name) b
WHERE a.tablespace_name(+) = b.tablespace_name
UNION ALL
SELECT f.tablespace_name,
SUM (ROUND((f.bytes_free + f.bytes_used) / 1024 / 1024, 2)
) "total MB",
SUM (ROUND(NVL (p.bytes_used, 0) / 1024 / 1024, 2)) "Used MB",
SUM (ROUND ( ((f.bytes_free + f.bytes_used) - NVL (p.bytes_used, 0)
/ 1024
/ 1024,
2
) "Free MB",
(SUM (ROUND (NVL (p.bytes_used, 0) / 1024 / 1024, 2)) * 100)
/ (SUM (ROUND ((f.bytes_free + f.bytes_used) / 1024 / 1024, 2))),
100
- (SUM (ROUND (NVL (p.bytes_used, 0) / 1024 / 1024, 2)) * 100)
/ (SUM (ROUND ((f.bytes_free + f.bytes_used) / 1024 / 1024, 2)))
FROM SYS.v_$temp_space_header f,
dba_temp_files d,
SYS.v_$temp_extent_pool p
WHERE f.tablespace_name(+) = d.tablespace_name AND f.file_id(+) = d.file_id
AND p.file_id(+) = d.file_id
GROUP BY f.tablespace_name
ORDER BY 5 desc --&orderby
Regards
Jafar

Excise Secondary Education Cess is calculating Double in MIGO

Hi All,
Excise Secondary Education Cess is calculating Double in MIGO
In PO it is showing SEcess is 3.20 Rs in Tax procedure But while in Goods Receipt it is showing 6.40 Rs ( Double )
If it is posted in J1IEX it is taking 3.20 Rs
Please help ,,,,,,
Manjunath

HI,
Might be in your pricing procedure having same condition in 2 times check it once. otherwise u have entered the value in 2 times in your purchase order.
Edited by: anjali.p on Aug 22, 2011 1:36 PM

HT5858 i have an iPhone 4s, when I tried to use control center to skip songs ( or signs) or when my phone is locked, i double press the home screen, i also can't skip songs. what's going on?

i have an iPhone 4s, when I tried to use control center to skip songs (>> or << signs) or when my phone is locked, i double press the home screen, i also can't skip songs. what's going on? please help me. i know the skip is being pressed because the sign lit up, but the song didn't skip. please help. thank you.

I am having the same problem with my Iphone 4. After update the phone will not control audio from the control center (Friend with Iphone 4S is having same issue). Tried to reset phone and it started working "once". Next time I tried to use the control center it didn't work again. Their needs to be some kind of a fix for this?

"Calculating Playback" even when effects switched off

If I assign "Full Reverb" to a track there is a slight "calculating playback" pause when I hit play. So far so good.
Why is it, though, that if I then switch off the reverb (by deselecting the green switch above the track's fader on the mixer), when I next hit play I don't get the effect - of course - however there is still a "calculating playback" pause. Is there a way of keeping the reverb in the track's effects rack ready for when I want to switch it back on, without having to have the "calculating playback" pause?

Yes it is still processed even if it is bypassed. Full reverb is about the only effect that does require a lot of pre-processing and gives that delay. If you are happy with your settings for it you can always Pre-Render the track by clicking on the Lightning box at the top right of the track effects rack. You can still go back and change things if you need but if OK it will save the processing pause when you hit Play.

Additional offset tax line after manual change of calculated tax amount

Dear all,
I have the following problem:
if I manually change the calculated tax amount of a domestic AP invoice in r12 the system generates a second tax line as an offset tax so that the total tax is zero. The system does this even so the respective flag is not set for this supplier. I can only stop this by erasing the link between standard tax and offset tax which is not a permanent option.
Kind regards
Carsten

You can uncheck the Auto Tax Calculation check box in E Business tax module which will ensure that automatic tax calculation will not be done.
Once the above checkbox is unchecked, you keyed an invoice by entering all the required details click on the Calculate tax button which will perform the tax calculation for your invoice.
Hope this helps.
Thanks and Regards
Manish Jain.

I got double charge when I purchased the ringtone what should I do?

I got double charges when I purchased the new ringtone what should I do?

http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/

Material Document List MB51 - Residual Amount when Quantity equals to Zero

Dear all,
I've this weird situation in the production system involving one material master as follows:
Material         Description     Plant     Mvt     Posting Date     Quantity     BUn     Loc.curr.amount
10015661     SCREW     61MM     561     30.04.2006     45     PC     2,660.40
10015661     SCREW     61MM     101     09.03.2007     96     PC     5,177.43
10015661     SCREW     61MM     101     24.03.2008     50     PC     3,124.75
10015661     SCREW     61MM     101     27.02.2009     84     PC     4,483.46
10015661     SCREW     61MM     101     28.02.2009     84     PC     4,433.87
10015661     SCREW     61MM     101     28.02.2009     84     PC     4,312.56
10015661     SCREW     61MM     309     07.04.2009     45-     PC     2,660.40-
10015661     SCREW     61MM     309     07.04.2009     96-     PC     3,823.63-
10015661     SCREW     61MM     309     07.04.2009     50-     PC     3,142.69-
10015661     SCREW     61MM     309     07.04.2009     84-     PC     4,695.03-
10015661     SCREW     61MM     309     07.04.2009     168-     PC     9,261.59-
                                              Sum:      0     PC     609.13
P/S: Sorry if the data gets messy after saving this message because I'm unable to format the columns correctly.
If look closely, there's a residual amount when the quantity is already "ZERO". I tried to simulate in the Quality system but was unable to recreate the same results. By right, the sum amount should be "ZERO" as well.
Would be most grateful for any explanation or advise.
Thank you.
Edited by: Steven Khoo on Apr 6, 2011 12:21 PM

Hi all,
I'm attempting to interpret the report generated by MR51 as below. I noticed there are line items with "RE" accounting document type which is stands for "Invoice - Gross". I can understand WA = Goods Issue and WE = Goods Receipt but why RE? For instance, there's a WE (Goods Receipt) of 50 PCs on 24.03.2008 and followed by a series of RE (Invoice - Gross) between 26.03.2008 and 23.04.2008. I'm confused over here. Thanks.
Material          Material Description     CoCd     ValA
10015661          SCREW                               1125            6110
Type     DocumentNo     Itm     Postg Date      Quantity     BUn      Amt.in loc.cur. Crcy
WA     4900011305     1     07.04.2009     -168     PC     -9,261.59           RM
WA     4900011304     1     07.04.2009     -84     PC     -4,695.03           RM
WA     4900011303     1     07.04.2009     -50     PC     -3,142.69           RM
WA     4900011302     1     07.04.2009     -96     PC     -3,823.63           RM
WA     4900011301     1     07.04.2009     -45     PC     -2,660.40           RM
RE     5100002095     796     31.03.2009     84     PC     254           RM
RE     5100002093     280     31.03.2009     84     PC     211.57           RM
RE     5100002089     276     31.03.2009     84     PC     261.16           RM
WE     5000002412     789     28.02.2009     84     PC     4,312.56           RM
WE     5000002408     271     28.02.2009     84     PC     4,433.87           RM
WE     5000002406     275     27.02.2009     84     PC     4,483.46           RM
RE     5100001398     2     29.04.2008     -96     PC     -1,353.80           RM
RE     5100001385     2     23.04.2008     50     PC     0.68           RM
RE     5100001384     2     23.04.2008     50     PC     0.68           RM
RE     5100001383     2     23.04.2008     50     PC     2.97           RM
RE     5100001382     2     23.04.2008     50     PC     2.31           RM
RE     5100001341     2     26.03.2008     50     PC     11.3           RM
WE     5000001702     1     24.03.2008     50     PC     3,124.75           RM
WE     5000000779     1     09.03.2007     96     PC     5,177.43           RM
WA     4900005345     1     30.04.2006     45     PC     2,660.40           RM
P/S: Sorry, the data gets messy after saving the post.
Edited by: Steven Khoo on Apr 25, 2011 10:11 AM

/102 u2013 401K wagetype calculated double amount when two hourly rates used

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for