MIRO Reference PO with many goods receipt

Dear guru ,
I enter an incoming invoice for a purchase order.
I have many goods receipt for this po , the system show all the goods receipt with their amount and quantity.
If I must do a change to the value is hard to distribute the new value for all the items.
Does exist a chance to insert the value for the total of all the goods receipts involved in order that the system execute an automatic splitting of the value for all the items ?
Thanks

Hello,
Do you want to aportion the cost for delivery cost in PO depends on value of each line item?
If they are unplanned delivery costs then this can be done as per following configuration.
SPRO>Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted.
This setting is at company code level.
Hope this was your question and it will help you.
Deepak.

Similar Messages

Automatic Payments-Offsetting Downpayments with related Goods Receipt-ECC6

Dear all,
We are using automatic payments (faa0) and creating a payment proposal to settle an invoice that has a downpayment posted for the same purchase order. The purchase order has a goods receipt posted against it.
We are on version ERP2005 (ECC6) and use Funds Management (BCS). New functionality in Funds Management allows for the offsetting(clearing) of the downpayment by the goods receipt value. For example:
You have created a purchase order for $200.
You have created a down payment for $100 as below.
Credit the bank account $100-
Debit the vendor special G/L $100
You then create a GR for $50. If this is a valuated GR and if you are using this feature, you get an additional posting like below in addition to the standard GR lines.
Credit the vendor special G/L $50-
Debit the vendor account $50
The problem we are experiencing is when we have to perform the automatic payment. The payment proposal is picking up the downpayment and determines that it needs to be settled but then generates the following message:
Message no. FZ347 - ...none of the payment methods defined can be used for these items
In analysing the error message we did the following:
1) Looked at remedies for customising settings for payment methods and payment groupings as per OSS note 164835 - F110 Clearing Credit Memos and Invoices - none of the remedies applied
2) Applied a test on a downpayment with no goods receipt - The payment proposal was able to process downpayment and net it off against the invoice and therefore the problem solely relates to this specific scenario and not all downpayments.
My question is whether anyone has managed to successfully create the payment proposal for the scenario described above and how they achieved it?
Thanks.
Regards,
Shaun

Hi,
500000*9 is GR and 51*0020205 is IR
GR/IR Commitment item- Find in the atttachment
OF29-Find in the attachment.
Thanks.

PO item with Multiple Goods receipt line items

Hi Experts,
When we create PO for specific vendor with one PO line item then at the time of Good receipt there are multiple GR line items. How to control those multiple GR line items as one GR item.
Appreciated your help
Regards
Krishna

Hi,
If you did GR from PO with underdelivery qty in line items, SAP recognize it as partial delivery.
Basically, in the standard system the underdelivery qty scenario is allowed, but not for overdelivery qty.
If you intended to force the system to allow one line item in PO with only one line item in GR, therefor you could create program checking with development team.
please check the link for your reference.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/a5/63344643a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
regards,
rob

Problem with posting goods receipt

Hi Gurus,
My PO is created for a material with quantity 45000 nos. Overdelivery tolerance is 20%. Already GR is posted for 48000 nos and MIRO is posted for the same.
Now, I want to post GR for the remianing qty ie. (45000*1.2) - 48000 = 6000 nos. When I try in MIGO, system says "No Selectable items for this PO".
What may be the possible reason? Please help me.
Regards,
Sastry

your PO has the delivery completed flag, as the first GR was already within the 20 % tolerance.
You can either remove the flag from the PO and then do MIGO.
Or you define your settings in MIGO and set a flag for propose all items.
Then you will even get closed items as proposal for a goods receipt.

2LIS_02_SGR Valid Requested Delivery recorded with no Goods Receipt

Please read message in its entirety before responding - I have done all my research.
My company is wanting to report on quantities that have been scheduled for delivery but yet have not been received. Why does 2LIS_02_SGR require a goods receipt to be available before posting a record? I have 5 records available in EKET, take note that SCLQTY is the field in the dataSource that is populated by EKET-MENGE.
EBELN        EBELP   ETENR EINDT      SLFDT      LPEIN MENGE
4500444313   00010   0001 04/12/2007 04/12/2007 1                4.000
4500444313   00020   0001 04/08/2007 04/08/2007 1                3.000
4500444313   00030   0001 08/01/2007 04/16/2007 1                1.000
4500444313   00040   0001 04/17/2007 04/17/2007 1                6.000
4500444313   00050   0001 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 1                4.000
However when I run the extractor for 2LIS_02_SGR only 4 records are returned.
Docno         line                                                               SCLQTY
4500444313    10    04/13/2007            04/12/2007    1            4.000
4500444313    20    04/13/2007            04/08/2007    1            3.000
4500444313    40    04/13/2007            04/17/2007    1            6.000
4500444313    50    04/13/2007            04/10/2007    1            4.000
OSS notes 739791, 617240,763547 state that you need a goods receipt in order to distribute the good receipt quantities correctly however the schedule line item is the driver not the goods receipt as one would think.
With those statements, the values in the OSS notes display this:
SCLDT - 05/05/2004
SCLTM -
SCLNR - 2
GMVPDT - 10/05/2004
BELNR - 5000000002
SCLQTY - 5 (schedule line quantity)
GMVQTY - 3 (goods receipt quantity)
OPNQTY - 2 (open quantity)
TTLQTY - 3 (total assigned quantity).
But why won't the extractor display like this?
SCLDT - 05/05/2004
SCLTM -
SCLNR - 2
GMVPDT - 10/05/2004
BELNR - 5000000002
SCLQTY - 5 (schedule line quantity)
GMVQTY - 0 (goods receipt quantity)
OPNQTY - 5 (open quantity)
TTLQTY - 0 (total assigned quantity).
I am unable to report this information correctly as I am missing the record I need. Can anyone please help with this? Is this just a short-coming of the extractor and there is nothing I can do about it? Or should this extractor work like I have it above with only scheduled quantity populated and no goods receipts and I need to submit an OSS note?

Hi
You can check the BW: Transaction keys/Process Keys in ECC, by using SPRO Transaction Key , see the navigation
Search for u201CTransaction Key Maintenance for SAP BWu201D.
Select it and double click on Transaction Key Maintenance for SAP BW
It will display the following screen with all Transaction Keyu2019s details; see for application component MM with
Application 02.
Thanks
Reddy

I want to run an open order report with no goods receipt

I'm looking to run an open order report with no confirmations(i.e.the order must have no status like LA,Z4,Z5,Z6)and no goods receipt.
ME80FN is still giving me orders that have no confirmations but closed.
I tried using a logical database but no luck.
What can i use to achieve this open order report?

Hi,
You can write a small report for this requirement:
Just select all the PO's from EKKO and EKPO table into an internal table(ITAB) with the given where condition.
Write a select statement for the MSEG for all entries in ITAB into an seperate internal Table(ITABM).(nothing but all GR's entries)
Compare Both internal tables and delete all entries which are present in second Int table ITABM from the first.
That's all.
The remaining entries are nothing but the OPEN PO's without any Goods Receipt.
Regards,
Anji

Mixing materials with different Goods Receipt date in the same Storage Unit

Hello everybody,
I´d like to know how FIFO strategy would affect to this example:
Adding boxes from one storage unit (pallet) to another storage unit (pallet). Both storage units have different goods receipt dates, so there is a pallet which has boxes with different GR dates.
Would FIFO make difference among boxes inside the storage unit?. As far as I know, when adding stock (boxes) to a handling unit (pallet), the system keeps the oldest GR date and does not create new quant number for the incoming boxes
Thanks in advance for your help

Hi Nagesh,
Thank you for the input. I am receiving Stock from vendor and while creating Inbound delivery i created the Handling Unit and also packed it and i could also post it (PG Receipt). Now when i am creating TO i have that error message. The Storage Location where i am receiving is 9001and i have also maintained the partner Storage location,,, its like this Plant(1000)-SLoc(9001)-Partner SLoc(9002).... now the Storage Location 9002 is not HU managed,, the reason i gave this Storage location is, initially i gave 9001, but system said "Storage Location 9001 and 9001 must have different management systems". So now kindly tell me what is the purpose of the partner Storage location and which storage location should i give, as my partner Storage location across "1000-9001-????" thank you again for ur inputs.
Regards,
Samuel

Production order confirmation cancellation with auto goods receipt

Hi expers,
I've got a production order using backflush and Auto GR for last operation(Control Key with Auto GR Tick). After the confirmation operation had been done,the end user cancelled the goods receipt using T-code/MvT:MIGO/ 102 by mistake,and then using T-code CO13 cancelld the confirmation.Now the delivered qty of the production order is negative, the material document generated by using MIGO/102 by mistake can't be cancelled, i also tried to do a migo with 101,the abap program dump. the production order can not even be viewed by using CO03.The ABAP program dump.
Any help would be much appreciated!

Here is some of the dump message:Runtime errors DYNPRO_FIELD_CONVERSION
Short text Conversion error .
Error analysis
The program has been interrupted and cannot resume.
Program "SAPLMIGO" attempted to display fields on screen 0200.
An error occurred during the conversion of this data.
How to correct the error
There was a conversion error in the output of fields to the screen.
The formats of the ABAP output field and the screen field may not match.
Some field types require more space on the screen than in the ABAP
program. For example, a date output field on the screen requires two
more characters than the corresponding field in the ABAP program. When
the date is displayed on the screen, an error occurs resulting in this
error message.
Screen name.............. "SAPLMIGO"
Screen number............ 0200
Screen field............. "GOITEM-WEMNG"
Error text............... "FX015: Sign lost."
Other data:

PO dont close with the GOODS RECEIPT

hi
We have this scenario.
there are some goods receipt PO based in a Purchase order xxx, but the Goods receipt doesnt a base document and the PO xxx is a open status. The goods receipt show in the remarks "based on xxx purchase order" and we can send to PO xxx to a new goods receipt again and this one closed. How do I link documents and the documente show close status to no duplicate the goods receipt. We have 2007 sp00 pl 05?
I´ve run the query in the sap note1152374 but we dont have any result.
Regards
NANCY HERNANDEZ

1.-When this error is generated is lost the link but also the PO document changes its status to open?
Is it possible? because de PO are open again
The PO is never closed due to lost link. It did not open again
2.-check the logs and there´s no changes more than the creation of document
When the document creating, no log will create for anything changing from PO. That is because they are different documents.
3 .- The scenario is replicable?, I can not generate the error again to explain to my costumer. How do I reply?
Yes, if you changes anything like warehouse, it will. (Even if you changed back to match the original!)) Let them to check out what are the differences between PO and GRPO.

Problem with closing Goods Receipt PO

Hello,
I want to close a Goods Receipt PO Document.
When I use the code below, an error occurs ( Date deviates from due date range,'208040' ) :
Public oGoodsRPO As SAPbobsCOM.Documents = CType(oComp.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oPurchaseDeliveryNotes), SAPbobsCOM.Documents)
oGoodsRPO.GetByKey(120210)
Dim Derr As Integer = oGoodsRPO.Close()
                    If Derr <> 0 Then
                        Dim serr As String = ""
                        oComp.GetLastError(Derr, serr)
                        Throw New Exception(serr)
                    Else
                    SBO_Application.SetStatusBarMessage("Goods Receipt was closed successfully")
                    End If
I then tried to change the active period and set it in October 2006, but
always the same problem.
What's the Origin of this problem and how I can solve it.
Thank You,
Best Regards,
Youssef El Bahmi.

Hi,
Try to get the Curren Period in a Message Box and Check whether you are closing the Document after Posting Date
Mohamed Zubair

Linking information between one Delivery Order and many Goods Receipt

We have a case of a business process we're looking for the solutions base on mySAP ECC 6.0
We deliver to customers by barge, each of DO for one barge. Goods on each delivery barge receipt directly from many truck, Can you tell me the SAP help to manage the information about barge and trucks.
Thanks and best regards

Hi Gordon,
Thanks for the info. Another idea: How about ..
- adding the item on a new line with the open qty and the correct date
- simply closing the partially posted line with the open qty (is that ok from the DB view?)
Any doubt that this could work as intended?
Thanks
Franz

MM invoice verification against delivery with no Good Receipts - will it work ?

Dear all,
Let me quickly explained my issue.
We have moved to INcoterms FCA, meaning that property transfer is taken when goods are loaded at the vendor site.
No transportation module is implemented. We create an inbounds delivery when receiving info from carrier. And later on, we are receiving against it. Transport module is not implemented.
But we need to post invoice before the Goofs is physically received because of long transportation time.
My questions - I guess it is basic, I am not a MM expert - far from it -
1) Will it be possible to post the invoice against the delivery without the good being physically received.
2) Property of the goods is not yet transfered before receiving - despite the incoterm- Well, I guess so - how the financial posting will work when creating the invoice.
Many thanks for your help.
regards,
Pierre Mikael

Thank tou for your answer.
This is driven by the Incoterms. With FCA, the ownership is transfered when the carrier is loading the Goods.
But physically, it will be received in3 to 6 weeks, I cannot do a GR, it will mess up planning.
BUt the property is transferred already. This is the reason why
1. we create Inbounds Delivery (Carrier loads the goods)
2. Invoice
3. GR when physically receiving the goods.
We have no transport management implemented. -
Therefore imagine I have a PO of 10, 5 are loaded by Carrier - delivery is created - Can I have Invoice verification on 5 only ?
Regards,
Pierre MIkael

Javascript errors with IE6 - Goods receipt

User have problems and receive javascript errors all the time, he is running IE6 which is a very old version, but according to PAM it should be supported. Java-version is not up-to-date on end user either. Unfortunately we can´t force an update on this.
error message:
Line 2647
Char 9
Error: unterminated string constant
Code 0
URL from eprocurement, including session ID and bc/gui/sap/its/bbpcf03/~session ID
transaction template is bbpcf03
Any ideas?

Dear Poster
Your thread has had no response since it's creation over
2 weeks ago, therefore, I recommend that you either:
- Rephrase the question.
- Provide additional Information to prompt a response.
- Close the thread if the answer is already known.
Thank you for your compliance in this regard.
Jason Boggans
SAP SRM SDN Moderator

Price difference in goods receipt with ref of purchase order

Dear all,
I am getting a difference in price with a goods receipt( movement type 101) which was created with reference to a purchase order. The purchase order price and G.R price are extremely different. I checked the inforecord..but price was not maintained in that.Price was entered manually in purchase order in conditions tab. can some one point out from where the price might have been calculated in Goods receipt.
Regards,
Edamanayil

Hi,
If its a standard price in material master record...then it will pick price from material master record ...
otherwise it will pick PO's price if no valid info record exists.
It can also read last PO's price....depending upon the setting.
Brgds,
Ashok

Posting Goods Receipt with ASN number in ECC with Message type: MBGMCR

We are using Basic Idoc Type :MBGMCR02 to Post Auto Goods Receipt in ECC.
This happens when external system ( 3rd Party System) sends this message which in turn posts the GR in ECC.
Thru Goods Movement BAPI
My Question is CAN WE POST auto goods receipt thru MBGMCR02 with Inbound delivery as reference document - Instead use ASN ( Advanced shipping notification ) which is Reference document in inbound delivery to Post Goods receipt in ECC.
This is required for our integration peice with 3rd party system.
And also pl let me if we can use Basic types MBGMCR01 or MBGMCR03 to post auto goods receipt in ECC with reference to PO which has confirmation control key set and instead of passing inbound delivery number can we pass ASN number which is external delivery ( Reference ) number and post goods receipt successfully in ECC.
Would appreciate your immediate help in this regard.
Regards,
Mahesh

Thank you Vinod.
We are using MBGMCR02 to post Auto GR by using BAPI - Inbound into ECC.
We have a 3PL scenario where third Party system will push this message to us ( ECC) which in turn post Auto Goods receipt.
Here is the process:
Systems involved : SNC / ECC / 3rd Party
ASN gets published in SNC which in turn posts inbound delivery in ECC and a copy of Inbound delivery with SNC ASN number is sent to third party system.
Third party system is the Carrier ( shipper) they in turn send us the shipment confirmation when they send the goods.
When they send it to our ECC we have MBGMCR02 to post Auto GR in ECC thru BAPI calling MB_GOODS_MOVEMENT
This will post the GR with respect to inbound delivery- That works fine..
Now we are testing an scenario where instead of sendindg ASN to 3rd part system from ECC after Inbound delivery is created.
We want to send the ASN information ( Which will have PO number as well ) without ECC 's inbound delivery number directly to 3rd party system after ASN gets published in SNC thru PI - This is before inbound delivery is created in ECC.
And the requirement is when 3rd Party system sends the shipment confirmation to ECC - They will send ASN ( SNC ASN) and ECC PO number with quantity , vendor , movement type :101 , movement indicator etc - CAN in ECC when you send these information without inbound delivery posts Auto Goods receipt.
Based on SNC ASN which is external delivery number in ECC as per PO / Reference number in Inbound delivery document.
Can MBGMCR01/ 02 / 03 posts GR in ECC with these information ( Mean without the ECC inbound delivery number )
Which will allow us to avoid the step of sending ASN information along with inbound delivery to 3rd party system after inbound delivery is created - Instead will send directly from SNC / PI / 3rd party
Point to be noted is - These are SNC PO's which will always have confirmation control key.
When 3rd part send the shipemnt confirmation with SNC ASN number and PO number while posting Idoc in ECC any of MBGMCR idoc types should check / search for inbound delivery associated and post the GR in ECC
Can you pl let me know your thoughts pl
Thanks,
Mahesh

MIRO Reference PO with many goods receipt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for