MIRO - UMB g/l Posting

Dear All
How system calculate g/l Posting for Transacion Key UMB.
I have Posted MIRO on 31.7.2014. Before Posting MIRO there was a Posting of other MIGO (Issue) Posting.
Now While Posting of MIRO system has generated two FI Documents.
While Posting of MIRO, system has calculate difference amount due to exchange rate during MIGO and MIRO and posted to Inventory - R M (g/l 202000) in One FI Document. In Another Fi Document system has posted in Gain / Loss Rev. g/l and Inventory - R M g/l.
I have attached 3 files describing my entries with posting Documets for your reference.
There are two FI documents which are posted during MIRO.
FI Doc No. 1451005409 and doc no.1451005467.
I can understand Posting of FI Doc No. 1451005409.
But my issue is how system has calcuted amount for another FI Document i.e 1451005467.
I have marked entries with Red color . system has posted amount 2693.25 Cr. in Gain/loss revl g/l
so how system has calculated amount 2693.25.
Check first screen shot for FI Document Posting
Another two screen shots are from MB5B report entries.
Regards
Swati Shah

Hi Swati,
The system has posted the 2nd entry on 01.08.2014 due to you have consumed the batch in Aug month. As per below calculation you consumed the qty 17500.
In 1 entry the system has posted the exchange rate diff per each qty = 3847.5/25000= 0.1539
Same rule applied for 2nd entry, to know how much consumed= 2693.25/0.1539=17500
Please check the qty in MB5B for the batch of the material.
Regards,
Mukthar

Similar Messages

MIRO Error-Can not post to mat.account & using overhead cost centre &.

Dear Colleagues,
On MIRO,users have come across this error where they can not post to a particular G/L account using 2 different cost centres(219 & 220).
We have some validations on OB28 but although one particular step menitons this message as I stated above,the prerequisite of that step seem to be referring to G/L IN VAL_Plant No_16 AND Cost Center IN VAL_Plant No_17.
Whereabouts I need to maintain this G/L account/Cost Centre Combination?II had a look at OME9/OKB9 but couldn't get any resolution looking over there...
All Help appreciated.
PAPJ1.

I had to tweak the types of error messages on OB28 temporarily,to allow for these postings to go through and it worked!.
PAPJ1

Miro line item after posted

Dear Forum,
After MIRO posted which with reference to PO, I create another new invoice with reference to the same PO again.
1 When PO number is entered, both quantity and amount fields empty and the item lines are still enabled despite invoice already posted. Why?
2 What would be the impact if I enter quantity and amount again?
Thanks

Dear Srina,
1. As per SAP standard, amount & qty field is not view mode. Reason is we are allowed to make any changes if there is any partial postings. System will show the line item without any value or qty in that particular line item if it has been already posted because originally both field is enable mode. If you want you can make this field grayed out with abapers help BUT you can't do any partial postings.
2. You can enter value & qty is empty field and click post but system will give you warning message saying that plz check is there invoice posted. You can post again by ignoring this warning message. Means you will have double invoice for said line item. Probably you may make warning message to error message so that system might disallow you to do so. Believe this help your queries. TQ
rgds,
nanthakumar

MIGO & MIRO no fx difference posting

Hi,
we had requirement i.e when we create po based the date system will pickup exchange rate say 0.658 and when we create migo that time rate was 0.789 and when we do miro rate was 0.8941 in GRN and MIRO entries getting posting when we do miro system posing the diff amount in price diff a/c now business they don't want to post any price diff entry.
I had check in the PO there is check box fixed rate if we tick the same exchange rate get flows up to miro and it's working fine.
now my question is how we can keep that check box default for some vendors is there any filed exit / user exit/ screen exit / any body needs to impliment or any substituion we can go about it.
any one have done same scenario???
Regards,
Raman

As per your requirement you want to set the field tick for some vendor.
If you do this at document type level, then it will be applicable for all vendors (Also you can't set the tick mandatory with field selection).
If you do this via Transaction variant, then you can restrict this for different user (but not for some vendor).
You have the last option as development (using badi or user exit)
I suggest, sit with your abap team and create a Z table for the list of the vendor which has the exchange rate tick is mandatory (using Z table, you can change/remove or add any vendor anytime from functional side)
Then write the logic as per your requirement on an user exit or badi.
Here is a document to find available user exit or badi for a transaction
Methods to find Customer/User Exit's & BADi's for a Transaction Code!

MIRO: two invoices were posted with same Reference Number?

Hi all!
Using the MIRO user posted two invoices with the same Reference number without any warning.
Is it normal?
Invoices looks exactly identical, the only difference is "Specl G/L assgt" which one of them has and another doesn't.
Regards.

Hi Harish,
I checked:
1) "Duplicate invoice number" : SPRO/Materials Management/Logistics Invoice Verification/Incoming Invoice/Set Check for Duplicate Invoices - set up for Company Code correctly
2) "Duplicate invoice number" setup for Vendor (FK03) (tick is set up)
3) OBMSG M8 108 set up as IE (not 100% sure it's exactly the same message I'm looking for)
Seems everything is fine.
But I posted 2 invoices in MIRO with the same reference - no warning or error.
Any advices?

MIRO Reversal-Inconsistant Document post

Hi Expert,
Invoice has been reversed using reversal function in MIRO. However documnets are not posted the same way.
In reversal document Debit in Vendor account credit in input tax account is correct ,whereas credit posting in GR/IR accounts and price difference account is not same as of original documnet. Though net balance is zero and documnet is posted in system.
Thanks
Biipin

Hi,
Transaction code MR8M used for reverse the Invoice documents.
While simulate this MR8M, System post the corrosponding credit memo posting to the vendor,
1. Vendor a/c debit
2. GR/IR clearing a/c credit accordingly.
Please try with MR8M and cancel the material docuemnt for the GR using MBST and Invoice MR8M.
Thanks,
Thiru

MIRO error during invoice posting

Hi,
when I post an invoice document with MIRO, the system prompts with the following error:
Account type K is not defined for document type RE
Message no. F5243
How can I post the invoice ?
Best regards

hi,
GO to OBA7 ....select the document type and select detail and select customer check box under account type allowed data.......
Hope it helps...
Regards
Priyanka.P

MIRO. Add double posting when system posts Cost differences ( PRD trx )

Hi gurus.
I think this question is very difficult.
My user wants to add double posting when the system posts costs differences.
With this example I think the question will be more clear.
Example:
Actual financial document of invoice with costs differences ( PRD ):
103644 ( vendor )   -30.000 u20AC
400900                     47.000 u20AC
610020                    -13.000 u20AC    ( Cost differences account )
In this case, my user wants to add this:
103644 ( vendor )   -30.000 u20AC
400900                     47.000 u20AC
610020                    -13.000 u20AC    ( Cost differences account )
300190                      13.000u20AC
300080                    -13.000u20AC
There are any OBYC transacition to do this?? or there are any add-in or user-exit to add accounts in MIRO trx??
Thanks.

Pls clarify on the process and what are these other G/Ls you are mentioning.
But apart from that if you want any random accounts to be hit depending on the document in question at the time of invoice, than you may activate manual entry into G/Ls in MIRO and than manually give the 2 accounts with debit/credit entries and it should work fine.
Regards,
Dakshesh

MIRO badi MRM_HEADER_CHECK park/post control

Hello friends,
We have implemented MRM_HEADER_CHECK badi to check unplanned delivery cost, and used MRM_PROT_FILL fm to fill the errors.
Everything going fine, but for this error message system should not allow to post document in MIRO, and it should only allow to part the document.
Any expert ideas where and how do we control to not to allow posting the document, but only to allow to park if any failure in this badi?
Thanks in advance.
Manohar

Check this thread in which Pablo Casamayor uses field symbol call stack technique (to retrieve values from main program memory) and use it to not allow saving in MIRO if there are still error messages.
Another problem also may arise that even if user corrects the invoice document still custom message may still show in the message log, for that issue also the post by Pablo clarifies.
[Pablo Casamayor's solution to MIRO messages problem with BADI: MRM_HEADER_CHECK |Tcode MIRO with BADI: MRM_HEADER_CHECK;

Miro gl account tab posting

hi all,
i do an entry in gl account tab (not reference to PO) and document is posted.
but when i check in rseg, i could not get the document which is 57#. i able to get the fin doc 52# in bkpf. even in reference key field it is recorded 57# followed by year.
may i know why not in rseg table?
thanks
rgds

Hi,
can you display the document 57# in MIR4?
What is the value of RBKP-RBSTAT?
Best regards.
Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Nov 10, 2009 9:59 PM

Profit Center Balancing error while posting MIRO

While I am passing a MIRO for a Service PO which has a WBS element as a cost object, facing a Doc Split Error u201C Balancing field profit center in the line item 001 not filled"
Service Entry was correctly posted and the Accounting Entry for it is :
1)     Exp A/c           Dr     100/-               Profit Ctr 123
2)     To GRIR Clearing A/c      Cr      100/-               Profit Ctr 123
You may note that the Vendor has a withholding tax code activated for invoice booking in the master and TDS is applicable in this case. VAT deduction is also applicable in this. Profit Center 786 was defaulted for the TDS Payable A/c using the T Code FAGL3KEH.
While simulating the MIRO after the above service entry sheet , I am getting the below accounting entry:
1)      Vendor           Cr     86/-          Profit Ctr Blank
2)     GRIR Clearing A/c        Dr     100/-          Profit Ctr 123
3)     VAT Input Credit      Dr     6/-          Profit Ctr Blank
4)      TDS Payable A/c     Cr     20/-          Profit Ctr 786
But the error is since the vendor line item is not getting filled with the profit center and hence the MIRO is not getting posted.
I know that this is definitely a splitting rule error but I am not sure in which split rule I should change the configuration.
Can any one please guide me since the requirement is very urgentt and critical.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Gemini

Hi Tarek
I have checked the following in my system :
1) Document Type RE which is being used for MIRO and the classficiation
the same in of this document type is : Business Transaction 0300 (Vendor Invoice) and Variant
is 0001 (Standard)
2) Document Split Method used in our system is 0000000012 and not a Z.......
3) Document Splitting Rules for the above combination of Vendor Invoice (0300) and Transaction Variant 0001
Profit Center is not being filled in the line item 001, which is the vendor one.
I have checked the base item category of 03000 (Vendor) and I found the following in it :
01000     Balance Sheet Account
01100     Company Code Clearing
01300     Cash Discount Clearing
05100     Taxes on Sales/Purchases
05200     Withholding Tax
06000     Material
07000     Fixed Assets
20000     Expense
30000     Revenue
But you may note that none of the above items are being checked for Automatically Split box.
Can you please advise further on this issue. Also can you provide your contact number so that I can call you since the issue is very critical in the production system.
Regards
Gemini

Freight posting in MIRO based upon multiple goods receipt.

Hi
In one of the companies they are requesting the freight charge to be broken into multiple lines (based upon multiple goods receipt) instead of one consolidated balances in the invoice (MIRO). Right now each time we do a MIGO against the same PO the system creates a seperate material document and the entry is (and that is correct) :
Inventory - XXXX
GR/IR (Cost)- XXXX
GR/IR (Freight) XXXX
PPV XXXX
for example if migo is done 3 times against the same PO the system posts 3 seperate material document and everything is correct.
When we do a MIRO the system generates 3 seperate lines for GR/IR (Cost) but it consolidates GR/IR(freight) and posts the entire value in one line.
Requirement is : We want the system to break freight cost into 3 seperate in the invoice.
Did anyone come across this issue before.
Thanks
Joseph

Hi Joseph,
I guess you can use MIRO 3 times, and post separated delivery costs into 3 freight invoices.
During each time, you can choose only 1 line to carry out the posting.
Thanks and regards,
Polly

Exchange Rate difference posting during MIRO posting

Hi ,
We are facing an issue for exchange rate difference posting during MIRO.
PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date. Vendor in PO has different currency than company code currency. Exchange rate maintained in OB08 for this period is taken in PO.
PO value & GR value is same. Due to raw material cost there was price difference posted during GR posting.
(i.e. Raw material cost - GR/IR value = Price difference amount)
During posting MIGO, 3 accounts got posted.
Raw material cost account got debited & offset credit to GR/IR account & price difference account (in vendor & company code currency also)
During posting MIRO, 4 accounts got posted.
Vendor account got credited with GR/IR amount & offset to GR/IR account debit.
Exchange rate difference account got credited & offset to price difference account (in company code currency only)
Since PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date, then why system has posted exchange rate difference account in local currency only during MIRO posting ?
Your inputs appreciated.
Thanks & Regards

Hi,
there is a setting in configuration of logistics invoice verification where you can control the calculation and posting of exchange rate differences. If you had the setting active that exchange rate differences are calculated against a planned exchange rate, that might lead to the kind of postings you describe. Please check.
best regards, Udo

MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt)

MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt) posting date.
Explanation:
Miro sholud be posted after the GRN has posted. It means that the Posting date of Miro should be greater than or equal to the Posting date of Migo. But I am facing the issue that I can able to post the Miro before the Migo date..
For example: I have posted the Migo(Goods receipt) document with the posting date u2013 10.8.09 and at the same time I can also able to post the Miro(Invoice Verification) posting date as u2013 5.08.09. This is should not be allowed . Kindly give me the solution. Is there any options in SAP standards to restrict this type of Postings(without using user exit).
regards
Varadharaj

Hi
you need to use BADi for this INVOICE_UPDATE
you can give logic as whil;e MIRO system will compare posting date with MIGO doc , then create a Z error msg in se91 nad assign it in that badi
take help of ABAPer, check following link
[LINK |GR date lesser than the PO date, the system should show an error message.;

Posting of MIRO invoices

Hi Experts
Please assist, my requirement is as follows:
I will be given an invoice that was previously parked/held because it did not have a goods receipt to it. After the goods receipt is done, the program should update the line items on the MIRO invoice and thereafter post that invoice..
Please advise me on how this could be done.
Kind Regards,
Dineo
Moderator message: "spec dumping", please work yourself first on your requirement.
[Rules of engagement|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/RulesofEngagement]
[Asking Good Questions in the Forums to get Good Answers|/people/rob.burbank/blog/2010/05/12/asking-good-questions-in-the-forums-to-get-good-answers]
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jun 30, 2011 10:37 AM

hi.
have you activated the GRbasedIV indicator in vendor master and PO?
Please check.
snagorij

MIRO - UMB g/l Posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for