Miro line item after posted

Dear Forum,
After MIRO posted which with reference to PO, I create another new invoice with reference to the same PO again.
1 When PO number is entered, both quantity and amount fields empty and the item lines are still enabled despite invoice already posted. Why?
2 What would be the impact if I enter quantity and amount again?
Thanks

Dear Srina,
1. As per SAP standard, amount & qty field is not view mode. Reason is we are allowed to make any changes if there is any partial postings. System will show the line item without any value or qty in that particular line item if it has been already posted because originally both field is enable mode. If you want you can make this field grayed out with abapers help BUT you can't do any partial postings.
2. You can enter value & qty is empty field and click post but system will give you warning message saying that plz check is there invoice posted. You can post again by ignoring this warning message. Means you will have double invoice for said line item. Probably you may make warning message to error message so that system might disallow you to do so. Believe this help your queries. TQ
rgds,
nanthakumar

Similar Messages

Manual account clear but can see line item after post document

Hi Guru!
I have post account clear with transaction code F-03 with open item zero balance such as
account 214001 balance +500
account 214001 balance -500
when I simulate entry the system not show line item for post document but can post it . I want to know why ?
thank you very much .

Dear,
This is standard behaviour...if line item which you are clearing have zero balance then system will not show any line items since open itemss are cleared....
when you have tolerance difference or the residual posting then only system will show the line item....
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

System should not allow to delete PO line Item after GR/IR

Hi,
I am working on a SAP Retail Implementation project.
Currently the system is allowing us to delete the PO line items after doing GR or IR against that PO line item. But the clients requirement is that the system should not allow to delete PO line item after doing GR/IR.
We are using Account Assignment Category-N, Item Category-S.
Please let me know if you have the solution for this requirement.
Thanks in advance
Thanks & Regards,
Suresh

Hi,
Standard SAP will not allowed the PO to be deleted once it was GR done. The controlled is on the attributes of message to set as "E"
Message no. 06115
But if invoiced takes place, the is the point that PO can be deleted.
You have to do have a Enhancement using MM06E005, insert you logic here to check PO history tables like EKBE, then check if invoice " Q" (BEWTP) exist, the PO cannot be deleted once the user delete the PO line and SAVE it. Ask you developer to help you on the following coding.
Use MM06E005 and EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
IF SY-TCODE = 'ME22N'.
IF sy-ucomm = 'MESAVE' OR SY-UCOMM = 'YES'..
LOOP AT TEKPO.
IF TEKPO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR1 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'E'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR2 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'Q'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
Regards,

Generate 2 line items with posting keys in same table while using FM .

Dear Expert ,
For T-code f-65 ,I have to park a FI Document .i tried with PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01 for parked Document . But i am not successfully park the document .
with the help of F-65 the data Segregate between Tables VBSEGS and VBSEGD with respecting Posting key . but with this Fm entire entry is displaying in table VBSEGS .For example it generated two line items with posting keys '15' and '40' and these both are displayed in VBSEGS whereas posting key '15' has to be displayed in VBSEGD.
when i check this Document in FBV0 Error reflect " G/L Account 0012000 1001 Does not Exist ".
Here my code -
DATA:   XT_BKPF LIKE BKPF OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEG LIKE BSEG OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEG1 LIKE BSEG OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEC LIKE BSEC OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSET LIKE BSET OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEZ LIKE BSEZ OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BKORM LIKE BKORM OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_THEAD LIKE THEAD OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_SPLTTAB LIKE ACSPLT OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_SPLTWT LIKE WITH_ITEMX OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE .
DATA :    XTEXT_UPDATE LIKE BOOLE-BOOLE VALUE SPACE,
          XTEXT_ITEM_UPDATE LIKE BOOLE-BOOLE VALUE SPACE,
          XI_UF05A LIKE UF05A,
          XI_XCMPL TYPE XFELD VALUE 'X',
          XFS006_FB01 LIKE FS006 ,
          XI_TCODE LIKE T020-TCODE VALUE 'F-65',
          XI_PARGB LIKE RF05A-PARGB        ,
          XI_TCODE_INT TYPE TCODE           .
DATA P_RETURN LIKE BAPIRET2 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
XT_BKPF-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BKPF-GJAHR     =     2011.
XT_BKPF-BLART     =     'DZ'.
XT_BKPF-BLDAT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-BUDAT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-MONAT     =     '06'.
XT_BKPF-CPUDT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-WWERT     = SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-USNAM     =     'ABAPER'.
XT_BKPF-TCODE     =     'F-65'.
APPEND XT_BKPF.
XT_BSEG-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-GJAHR     =     '2011'.
XT_BSEG-BUZEI = '001'.
XT_BSEG-BSCHL = '40'.
XT_BSEG-KOART = 'S'.
XT_BSEG-SHKZG = 'S' .
XT_BSEG-GSBER     =     'CPLN'.
XT_BSEG-BUPLA = 'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-WRBTR     =     10000.
XT_BSEG-PSWSL = 'INR'.
XT_BSEG-ZUONR = 'CH. 123456'.
XT_BSEG-HKONT = '241000'.
APPEND XT_BSEG .
CLEAR XT_BSEG.
Vendor line item - required even for header only - BSEG table
XT_BSEG-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-GJAHR     =     '2011'.
XT_BSEG-BUZEI = '002'.
XT_BSEG-BSCHL = '15'.
XT_BSEG-KOART = 'S'.
XT_BSEG-SHKZG = 'H' .
XT_BSEG-GSBER     =     'CPLN'.
XT_BSEG-BUPLA = 'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-WRBTR     =     10000.
XT_BSEG-PSWSL = 'INR'.
XT_BSEG-ZUONR = 'CH. 123456'.
XT_BSEG-HKONT = 'PC04000001'.
APPEND XT_BSEG .
CLEAR XT_BSEG.
CALL FUNCTION 'PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01'
   EXPORTING
     TEXT_UPDATE            = XTEXT_UPDATE
     TEXT_ITEM_UPDATE       = XTEXT_ITEM_UPDATE
I_UF05A                =
     I_XCMPL                = XI_XCMPL
FS006_FB01             =
      I_TCODE                = XI_TCODE
I_PARGB                =
I_TCODE_INT            =
IMPORTING
    XEPBBP                 = CHECK_A
    TABLES
      T_BKPF                 = XT_BKPF
      T_BSEG                 = XT_BSEG
      T_BSEC                 = XT_BSEC
      T_BSET                 = XT_BSET
      T_BSEZ                 = XT_BSEZ
T_BKORM                =
T_THEAD                =
T_SPLTTAB              =
T_SPLTWT               =
          EXCEPTIONS
            ERROR_MESSAGE = 1.
P_RETURN-ID         = SY-MSGID.
P_RETURN-TYPE       = SY-MSGTY.
P_RETURN-NUMBER     = SY-MSGNO.
APPEND P_RETURN.
     p_return-MESSAGE_V1 = XSYMSGV.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      EXPORTING
        WAIT = 'X'.
ENDIF.
WRITE :/ sy-subrc , sy-MSGV1 .
Thanks ,
Ashish Gupta

Hi Raghuram,
I found a very important SAP Note 103051, details are below.
An IDoc processed by function module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MM (of category INVOIC01) must not refer to the same purchase order item in several invoice items. This is also valid if for a goods receipt-related invoice verification several delivery notes belong to the same purchase order item.
Depending on the system settings and the situation, various error messages can occur (for example, FD240 'Order item ... selected more than once' or M8050 'Balance not zero: & debits: & credits: &').
In this situation module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM generates error message M8321 'Document contains same order item more than once'.
For example, this situation occurs if you work with individual batch valuation and the SD billing document executes a batch split for different batches which belong to the same purchase order item and delivery.
Other terms
INVOIC, SAPLIEDI, M8047, M8, 321
Reason and Prerequisites
This is because of the program design.
Solution
There is no solution for IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MM.
Module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM (only as of Release 4.0) for the logistics invoice verification can distinguish different goods receipts by means of the delivery note number. For this purpose, GR-related invoice verification must be active.
Owing to this symptom, billing documents for single batch valuation with batch split cannot be settled in MM-EDI inbound processing. The settlement generates exactly the situation described (several invoice items for the same purchase order item). In this case, the only solution is to deactivate the billing of the batch sub-items in SD Customizing and to calculate the main item only.
Hope this helps.
Reward if helpful.
Thanks

Miro line item indicator

Dear Forum,
In miro line item, there is a drop down list on indicator. There are 3 item to choose from but I would just like to ask on
1 planned delivery costs
2 goods/service items + planned delivery costs
What is the implication of choosing 1)planned delivery costs or 2)goods/service items + planned delivery costs?
Thanks

hi srina,
when we say that we only want to settle the planned delivery cost, then we go for settling the planned delivery cost,
now the question arrises that why do we go for settling this only, this is done when u have ur main vendor different from the supplying vendor, generally at that time we settle both the costs differently,
and when we have the the main vendor acting as a the delivery vendor also, then we settle both the cost together...
Hope it helps....
regards,
yk

Miro line item

Dear Forum,
I would like to seek clarification on miro line item. Below are few scenario which I need help.
1) when PO number is entered, why item lines are still grey out?
2) when PO number is entered, item lines not grey out but quantity and amount fields empty
3) when PO number is entered, item lines not grey out and quantity and amount fields with value
4) all in all, how system decides to populate or not to populate value in columns in miro line item
Thanks
Rgds

Hi,
Pls find the reasons for the same
1) when PO number is entered, why item lines are still grey out?
     It means that the PO line item has GR based invoince verification and no GR has been happened yet.
2) when PO number is entered, item lines not grey out but quantity and amount fields empty
     It means that that the GRN has been happenned for the PO line item and invoice is also happenned for that GR.
3) when PO number is entered, item lines not grey out and quantity and amount fields with value
     It means that GRN is processed for the PO line item and no IR has been happenned
4) all in all, how system decides to populate or not to populate value in columns in miro line item
     The main setting depends upon the GR based invoice verification indicator in the PO line item.
Regards,

Miro line item quantity and amount after miro

Dear Forum,
I have got the help about this subject and quite clear. Thanks for all have helped.
Now I need to confirm 1 more part.
Assuming in PO there are 2 scenarios where gr based iv is ticked and also not ticked, after both GR and miro done (complete the process from PO until book vendor invoice in miro), I purposely do another miro invoice type referring to these 2 PO.
I just wonder why the item line still enabled with quantity and amount fields empty? I thought the line item should be totally grey out?
Need advice.
Thanks
Rgds

Dear Srina,
As Std SAP practice system will populate the line item with enable mode even though MIRO fully done for said line item. But any how message will prompt if you enter amount & qty again in empty field & wanted to post the said line item as stated below;
"Check if invoice already entered under accounting doc. no. XXXXXXXXX 2010". Probably you may refer to abapers to have user exit to control this field.
Please view the below link for better understanding.
Exits and Badi in Logistic Invoice Verification
Calculate tax in MIRO
rgds,
nanthakumar

Make changes to auto generated line items when posting invoice thru MIRO?

Hi All,
My requirement is to make some changes in line items data when posting invoice through MIRO transaction.
I have written a substitution for the same, The issue is that some line items get automaticaly created (i.e inter company posting). I need to make changes to these line items as well but substitution is not being triggered for these auto generated line items.Is there any way by which I can update in these line items as well ?
further do we have any internal table which holds all the line items at runtime....to which I can refer and make the changes. I have searched but could not find one.
Can anybody provide some inputs on this.
Thanks,
Lucky.

Hi Kaushik,
Thanks for your reply.
I am using BADI INVOICE_UPDATE but here we will not be having line items which are auto generated.
When we do inter company posting, line items are automatically created and these are not avaliable in the BADI. I am not sure if we can trap these line items any where.....the possible alternative which I can think of is to use memory reference and modify the internal table which holds all the items but unfortunately I am not able to find any such internal table to refer to at run time ...have u got any idea on this?
Thanks,
Lucky.

Table for tax code line item after miro

Can anybody tell table for tax code line item (other than BSET) after MIRO.
Raj

Hi,
First let me explain you the logic in this repot.
If a document have more than one GL accounts relevant for tax and having the same tax code. So there is only one tax line for that tax code in BSET.
Now in the standard reports like S_ALR_87012357, output has the tax base amount etc, based on tax line from BSET which is a single line the above document. However this single line contains multiple tax relevant account and thus SAP can not show all the G/L account for this single line in the report S_ALR_87012357. So SAP picks up the first account in the output.
The declaration in this report is not wrong, as the total gets calculated based on the tax code and which is correct and meets the tax reporting requirement.
If you want to see the G/L account wise output, you can use the program RFUMSV10. Refer OSS note 1175418 "RFUMSV00: G/L account display" for details.
https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1175418
In your report, you can use this program logic for reference.
Regards,
Gaurav

Posting Line Items after Archiving in SAP

Hi Experts,
I have a small query regarding SAP data archiving in Financial accounting data. I have archived Financial total records data for one fiscal year (2010), and that data is deleted from the SAP database. Now my client is trying to do catchup activity of posting some more new line items for the same fiscal year (2010), this data is not archived and available in the SAP database.
My Question is:
1. can client retrive both the data which is archived and not archived from the standard Transactions?
2. If it is possible, can client will get the consolidated values of line items (which are retrived from database as well as archive files) in the report resulted in retrival process to secure the balance carryforward function?
Please let me know if there are any standard recommendations or a workaround techniques to meet this business requirment.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Irrshaad.

Hi, you have stopped/end the process. Now you want to archive with the correct variant selection criteria. For this to be successful, please first change the customising that you require and then in SARA--> re-create a new variant with the correct selection criteria to archive your data.
Please ensure that in t.code <file> you have maintained all the logical file path, fine name, pysical path's maintained properly.
I Hope your problem will be resolved.

Item Text in FBL3N copied automatically from MIRO line item

All,
When a purchase order is created to a cost centre, G/L account and cost centre are entered manually. Often Purchase Order only uses short text field as reference, ie, Material is not mandatory.
MIRO process is then done for PO after GR, and the PO text (short text) is copied into MIRO.
G/L account line items can be displayed in FBL3N, detailing the document numbers related to the invoice/PO once posted.
The field "Text" is defaulted as blank, even if created with reference to a PO which contains text. Does anybody know of a way to automate process so that the text field is populated with the text from MIRO.
Thanks.

Hi Jacob,
You can transfer what ever the data from the MIRO to Accounting document using BTE.
Goto SE37 - SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120 (this is the standard BTE for account document posting). copy this with ZSAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120.
In this you cannot modify the tables t_bkpf and t_bseg. you can use t_bkpfsub and t_bsegsub.
For this a little bit config is required.
1) Goto t-code FIBF-> settings->Products->... of a customer.
Click new entries -> product name- ZPRODUCT , text - any text, RFC dest - ZSAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120, A - enable check box -> save.
2) Go back -> settings -> P/S Modules -> ... of a customer.
Click new entries -> event - 00001120, Product - ZPRODUCT, Ctr - Country key, Appl - FI-FI, Function module - ZSAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120 -> save.
3) Go back -> settings -> Process Modules -> ... of a customer.
Click new entries ->Process - 00001120, Ctr - Country key, Appl - FI-FI, Func module - ZSAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120, Product - ZPRODUCT -> save.
Now goto SE37->ZSAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120
logic.
loop at t_bkpf.
loop at t_bkpfsub.
move 'your value' to t_bkpfsub-value.
modify t_bkpfsub index sy-tabix.
endloop.
endloop.
loop at t_bseg.
loop at t_bsegsub.
move 'your value' to t_bsegsub-value.
modify t_bsegsub index sy-tabix.
endloop.
endloop.
''your value' is imported value.
no need to worry abt modified values. after execution of BTE it will go to standard prog and copy the values of t_bkpfsub] and t_bsegsub[ to SAP tables. so pls be perfect with code. SAP wouldn't allow change the values in t_bkpf] and t_bseg[ values. you can add your own fields in bkpf_subst and bseg_subst.
But make sure that, pls write the code in FM with conditions like cocode doc type etc. bcz this BTE is very important. it will executes before acc doc is posted.if you do not specify any conditions it will execute for all co codes in acc doc. it will affect business. you can debug this BTE. put a break point in FM and see the values while post the MIRO.
once import the values free memory id and clear the variables what ever u used in BTE.
Best Regards,
Mohan.

Miro line item not generated

Dear All,
I have facing one issue at the time posting in MIRO.
I post one of migo doc in date 03/01/2010 , the entry is:( with same material )
Post key   description amt                               curr.( USD)
89              Stk.RM -IMP                                     32100.00
96              PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                     32100.00
40              Purchase RM-IMP                            32100.00
50              Purchase offset.                             32100.00
And Miro Posting on date 23/03/2010
Post key   description amt                               curr.( USD)
31           xyz Vendor                                    32100.00
86           PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                    32100.oo
89           Stk.RM -IMP                                    -
40           Purchase RM-IMP                          -
50           Purchase offset.                           -
But when I post for another po in migo on date 03/01/2010
Post key   description amt                               curr.( USD)
89              Stk.RM -IMP                                     76800.00
96              PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                     76800.00
40              Purchase RM-IMP                            76800.00
50              Purchase offset.                             76800.00
and miro posting on date 19/02/2010
Post key   description amt                               curr.( USD)
32            yz Vendor                                       76800.00
86           PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                      76800.00
89           Stk.RM -IMP                                      Line item not generated
40           Purchase RM-IMP                             Line item not generated
50           Purchase offset.                              Line item not generated
Can any one tell why line item not generated for miro posting .
Regards
Milind

Hi,
The extra line items will be generated when there are any exchange rate diffrences are there then only shows.
Other wise it wont show those extra line items
Please check group currency , global currency etc. for your extra line items

Line Item: After reading all your links and discussions

From the links and the discussions I was referred to in a previous post, please correct me if I am wrong. I understood that with if a characteristic is going to have several values (defined in that case as "has cardinality"), then it is better to make that characteristic a line item.
It has some advantages as a result of the fact that the line item dimension has no dimension table but only SID table.
1--Does this make loading data faster Or, running queries faster?
2--I also read that "line dimension on means that this dimension becomes part of fact table", can you explain this?
3--Some of the experts said you create line item when the characteristics in the dimension is 20 or 30 % that of the fact table. Is this 20 or 30? And, are we comparing all the characteristics in all the dimensions in the Cube or just the one dimension which we want to make the line item?
4--Also, I get the 20 or 30% of the Dimension but what it being compared to in the Fact Table?
5--I didn't get the cardinality stuff well so any hints other than links will help.
6--Finally, won't this easily make the designer run out of the 13 (16-3 reserved) available dimensions?
7--If the Rule of thumb is dimension table size should be smaller than fact table, and line item dimensions makes this possible, isn't it in the same token killing the ratio of 16 dimension to 1 Fact table in a cube?
8--Is this a consideration after data has been loaded into Cubes or during the design phase of the Cube?
9--If this consideration is applicable only when there is data then how can you factor this into your design? How to wait until you are in trouble to fix the problem?
Thanks

HI Caud,
1] Query reading performance will be improved. As it can access only Master data table and Fact table.
Setting it as a Line Item dim also causes a b-tree index to be built instead of a bitmap index, but also embeds SID directly in the fact table, eliminating the dimension table.
2] Line item Diemsion- when ever ur Dimension table contains a single Char then it is better to join ur master data table with the Fact table. So there will be connection with SID.
3]U chooses the line item when ever there is a high cardinality. i.e if ur DIM table is 10%of Fact table then u will go with the Line item Dim.
the percentage is w.r.t the number of records.
4] its total number of records.
5]Cardinality creates indexes on the Dimension table entries and there by you would see an improvement in performance.
With Cardinality, you can assign a Dimension containing Multiple Characteristics
6] It depends based ur business requirement and the type of data that u use.
8] It is before loading into the cube.
9]it is better to design at the initial stage it self.
Refer this link..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a7/d50f395fc8cb7fe10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Regards-
MM
Assign points if it helps.
It is better to assign points to all who ever replies to u. As they spent lot of time on these Threads.
Message was edited by: vishnuC

COMPARE MIRO LINE ITEMS WITH PO LINE ITEMS

Is there any standard report available to find out MIRO line itemwise values with the respective PO line items?
We would like to have control on any price increase after PO has been raised?
Regards,
Sudha

u can use rbkp and rseg tables to get ur details
and u can use EKKO and EKPO to make ur report
or bkpf and bseg
hope this helps

How update Fund Center and Commitment Item after posting

hi Experts,
Funds management was activated during the year and hence there are few open items saved without capturing Fund Center and Commitment Item. When i tried to clear these open item i get the following error
Line in document xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx does not contain any commitment items
Is there any program which i can use to update derivation to the already posted line item
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
Solutions proposed by Alexey are good if FM document was created for the FI documents in question. If, however, no FM document was created, reassignment process won't help. You can try FMN0 transaction after creating a derivation rule in FMDERIVE for these documents, but I cannot confirm that it would be sucessful as FMN0 transaction is not perfect.
The solution could be updating FI tables (BSEG/BSIS/BSAS) with FM assignment (fund centre/commitment item) and only then running FMN0 transaction. In this case, FM document will be created and you'll be able to process the items.
Regards,
Eli

Miro line item after posted

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for