MIRO vs FB60

Hi all
I have a question regarding MIRO and FB60
The standard procedure to creating invoice is : ME21N --> MIGO --> MIRO
but in our office there was situation like this :
after MIGO, some user create invoice using FB60 so there is no link between PO and Invoice itself and the MIGO still open and waiting to be invoiced.
We don't know how it happen, not all the invoice treated like that
My question is: how to prevent users to create another invoice (duplicate invoice) using MIRO? Because the invoice already done using FB60
Thanks a lot
Regards,
Della

Hi Della,
If there was some requirement then it can be handle, but principally this is not good practice, as you told that after MIGO, some user create invoice using FB60, see what entries you are doing.
Entry at MIGO:
Expense A/c    100
            GR/IR clr A/c   100
Entry through FB60:
Expense A/c    100
                       Vendor    100
In this case your user booking double expense one at the time of MIGO and other one is directly in FI by FB60. Furthermore Open was there in GR/IR clearing account.
If it was requirement, to book invoice through FB60 after MIGO, although it can be handle, so you can use MR11 to reverse the expense booked at the time of MIGO, in this case your stock value will be zero but the quantity will remain there, after that you have to adjust your stock value manually by MR21.
Thanks
Javed

Similar Messages

  • Reference filed length in MIRO and FB60 should be increased.

    Hi ,
    I have a problem with the reference filed in the transaction MIRO and FB60, needs to increase the field length from 16 to 19.
    Is it possible ? if so how we can we do that?
    We have got one idea to use existing Header text field for the reference field, then how to map the Header text field to reference field in the General Ledger?
    can you pls look into this and do the the needfull.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Phani.

    Hi,
    I think you can change field length for reference field. Goto domain XBLNR1 and change the length of the field.
    Or
    There is another common field (assignment field) in both the transactions FB60 and MIRO.
    This is field also additional information field for item. this field length is 18. You can use this field instead of changing length of reference field.
    You can see this field in FBL1N also.
    Regards,
    Chandra

  • Screen Layout with MIRO, FB50, FB60, FB65, FB70, FB75 ETC.

    Hi,
    Can anybody let me know how the screen layout of TCode= MIRO, FB50, FB60, FB70, FB65, FB75 etc. is changed?
    I want to add the column "COMMITMENT ITEM" during posting with the above Transaction Code.
    Please help.
    Regards
    Rahkes

    Hi Amanullah,
    Thanks for your response.
    For Commitment Item - I have created one DUMMY Commitment Item with Financial Transaction = 50 (Clearing). (TCode-FMCIA)
    I like to assign this DUMMY Commitment Item where I don't require the Fund Management Activities like Budget. I am doing this b'cos commitment item is mandagory in Fund Management.
    I have assigned Commitment Item = DUMMY to all remaining GL Account in FS00.
    When I am posting transaction with FB01 then it has no problem b'cos the field Commitment Item is visible and optional and "DUMMY" is automatically assign to the commitment item. But in case of FB50, FB60, FB70, MIRO etc where the Commitment Item field is not visible I am getting the error "No Commitment Item entered".
    To avoid this error, to me there are two options
    1. I can assign the "DUMMY" commitment item to each GL Account under FMDERIVE
    2. To assign to "DUMMY" commitment item to each GL Account in FS00 and make the commitment item visible and optional in all T-Code like FB50, FB60, FB70, MIRO etc. But in this case I am not able to make the commitment item visible and optional during posting of the transactions.
    Could you please help with your expereise?
    Which option is more logical in this case?
    Regards
    Rahkes

  • Enhancement Field at Header level of MIRO doc & FB60 doc

    Hello
    We have required a field at MRIO or FB60 details tab, if an enhancement are available so that help me.
    Regards
    avijit

    Hi
    You can use Badi BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01
    If you have a look at badi BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01 in se18 you´ll see that there is an example implementation class named CL_EXM_IM_BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01 .
    Read carefully as well the documentation of BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01.
    This will work for both MIRO and FB60
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • BADI or Userexit for MIRO and FB60 for displaying an error message

    Hello,
    Could you please let me know the BADI or User Exit validation Bank House field and displaying an error message in MIRO and FB60?
    Thanks,
    Md

    Hi,
    you can try with badi MRM_HEADER_CHECK.
    in method HEADERDATA_CHECK you can do something like:
    IF sy-tcode = 'FB60' OR sy-tcode = 'MIRO'.
      IF I_RBKPV-HBKID = 'WHATEVER'.
    * for the message in MIRO you can use this fm
        DATA: gt_errtab0    TYPE TABLE OF mrm_errprot,
              gs_errtab0    TYPE mrm_errprot.
                CLEAR gs_errtab0.
                gs_errtab0-msgty = 'E'.
                gs_errtab0-msgid = 'ZXX'.
                gs_errtab0-msgno = '030'.
                gs_errtab0-source = 'Q'.
                APPEND gs_errtab0 TO gt_errtab0.
                CALL FUNCTION 'MRM_PROT_FILL'
                  TABLES
                    t_errprot = gt_errtab0.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    Best regards.

  • Payment Terms Display in MIRO and FB60

    SAP Security experts,
    I want to give access to the A/P clerks to only be able to display the payment terms and not be able to change it in MIRo and/or FB60.
    Anyone knows the authorization object for this
    Thank You for your help.

    In this activity you can define and edit field status variants and groups. You group several field status groups together in one field status variant. You assign the field status variants to a company code.
    You can also define and process field status groups. You must define a field status group in the company code-specific area of each G/L account. The field status group determines which fields are ready for input, which are required entry fields, and which are hidden during document entry.
    Field status variant 0001 is entered for company code 0001 in the standard SAP software. Field status groups are already defined for this variant.
    Other than this I dont think there are any transaction specific field status allocations.
    But, yes you can always use transaction variants as an option wherein you can create transaction variant using SHD0 for MIRO and FB60.
    Edited by: Subramaniam Iyer on Dec 16, 2008 8:50 AM

  • Display Payment Terms in MIRO and FB60

    FI Gurus,
    How can I restrict A/P clerks to only view payment terms when entering an invoice thru FB60 or MIRO.
    Thank You for your help,

    HI,
    You can build a transaction and screen variant using SHD0 and assign it to a user.
    Refer to the link below for more info:
    [Transaction Variant|http://www.mortenhjorthnielsen.dk/Security/transactionvariants.htm]
    Cheers.

  • MIRO or FB60

    Hi Gurus,
    Duplicate payments were sent to a vendor due to the processing of an incoming invoice.  One payment was made because the invoice was processed by way of a purchase order using MIRO.  The other payment was made based upon an invoice that was processed through FB60 without a purhcase order.  The amount, company code, vendor and reference were identical.  Does SAP not review for duplicate invoices using FB60?  Is Best Practice to activate G/L postings within MIRO and allow for non-po related invoices to be processed through there?  What other processes exist to stop duplicate payment/invoicing within SAP?
    Thanks!
    Pete

    Hi Cartman,
    For the vendor master record, are you referring to "Chk double inv." within the section "Payment transactions Accounting"?  If so, that is ticked.  Is there something else that I am not seeing?
    You cannot post invoice through MIRO without purchase order.
    I found that if you enter IMG > MM > LIV > Incoming Invoice > Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts, you can activate a tab within MIRO that will allow you to post invoices without purchase order references.  Here's the link that I found for that:  <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/a8/b99f58452b11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm">Direct Posting to G/L Accounts using MIRO</a>
    But I'm still not sure why or how the invoice was able to be created if it was for the same vendor, co code and amount?  Then on top of that, based upon the link above, is it a preferred SAP practice to go through MIRO so LIV captures everything to avoid this issue?
    Thanks again,
    Pete

  • Field Selection for MIRO Vs FB60

    Dear Guru,
    I have some problem about field screen in MIRO is not same FB60.
    Example: FB60  has field: PmntCurrcy (INVFO-PYCUR  Currency for Automatic Payment) in header tab: Payment
    but in MIRO does not has it.
    Is it possible to configure to open that field in MIRO?
    Thank you very much.

    Hi,
    have you read this OSS Note?
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/904652
    the tittle is quite revealing:  Note 904652 - MIRO: Different from FB60
    Best regards.
    Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Sep 8, 2009 10:18 AM

  • Tax - MIRO and FB60

    Experts,
    We are in the processing of migrating a Co Cd from Non-SAP system to SAP System and we were planning to take care of the tax thing manually for now and then have it automised.
    However it looks like when you are doing FB60 - You can enter the tax manually as a line item where as when you are doing MIRO, as it is done based on a PO, we cannot enter it manually - Can somebody confirm this ? Or is there anyway we can enter an line item manually at MIRO ?
    All answers/views would be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
    Thanks,
    Nandita

    In MIRO, you can enter manually in GL account & Material tab.
    Also, you can change the tax code in the selected item under PO reference tab.
    Regards,
    Amol

  • Business Place in MIRO and FB60

    Hi friend,
    I input business place data by using FB60, I can see the data of bus. place update to the field of Branch number by using FB03.
    But why the data of bus. place can't be updated to the field of Branch number in FB03 when I input business place by using MIRO?
    Can someone tell me how to solve this issue?
    Thank advance.

    by myself

  • Invoice (MIRO or FB60) with reference Material Master or Material Group

    Hi Gurus,
    I want to post invoice with reference to material master or material group.
    There is never purchase order, but i want to manages expenses on material categories,
    eventually have automatically the GL account after fullfilling material or material group.
    Thanks for your help,
    Denis

    Thanks,
    But when i post a material, i've an error message about the GL account. Have you used this process entirely ?
    Denis

  • Mass cancellation of invoices Posted in MIRO and FB60

    Hello,
    Because of wrong VAT customizing in OB40, i have several invoices posted to wrong VAT G/L Account.
    Now the user need a solution to correct this situation.
    I proposed FB08, F.80, MR8M but this is not a good solution for the user because, if i reverse one of this wrong invoices, the system will post the reversal to the new G/L account that is recently corrected in OB40
    What is the solution in this case, manual G/L posting ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Just curious: why cannot you put the old 'wrong' account in OB40, reverse the invoices and then correct the assignment back?
    Regards,
    Eli
    P.S. By the way, I'm not that sure that, during the reversal the systme will 'derive' the account; I believe, it should simply make a reversal posting on the accounts of original documents.

  • Make the default of Housebank at MIRO or FB60 by using substitution logic

    Dear Gurus,
    I want to make the filed Housebank as default by some code 3100. I want to do this using the substitution rule.  I was not able to get the field as substitutable field.
    Later,  I tried with SE16n to add the field as substitutable field.
    My specifications at SE16n are as follows:
    Table GB01
    Boolan class empty
    Boolan class type as S
    table Bseg
    field HBKID
    I have created the substitution by using the field BSEG-HBKID.
    But I am not able to substitute the House bank field what I have written at substitution rule.
    Pls anybody can me out as it is urgen.
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkata Reddy.Mudda

    Dear phani,
    There a substitution already at company code.
    It is not allowing me to assign the new substitution to company code again. It is throwing the error message as "already exist with same key".
    Regards,
    Venkata Reddy.Mudda

  • Vendor - Tax deduction at lower rate - MIRO & FB60

    Hi all,
    Currently we are having one issue of u201CTax deduction at lower rateu201D for a Vendor who is having such certificate with him.
    For amount purpose we have set the SPRO setting but the user is asking for the date control also since the Vendor is having the relevant certificate till 31.03.2012 and after that, lower rate Tax deduction will not be allowed.
    Simple option is to change the Vendor Master with the original tax type+ Tax code (Normal Rate) combination to calculate tax at the normal rate. But if could not cross the amount limit before 31.03.2012 then that will be difficult to keep an eye on date i.e. 31.03.2012 and then change the master data of u201CNu2026u201D No. of Vendors .
    We want to put a condition in a system as; system should check the system date with the tax type date to get a date control. We have restricted the date of u201Cnewly created tax typeu201D till 31.03.2012.
    In case of MIRO testing, we have use a user exit which is correctly comparing the system date with the tax type date in runtime. If the tax type date is older than system date then system is throwing an error to change the master date (FK02 / XK02) of subject vendor.
    In case of FB60 we are facing a problem since not able to cross confirm the tax type date with the system date. We are trying BTE u2013 1140 for FB60 but in runtime we are not able to get the tax related details / tables.
    Is there any workaround or way in BTE u2013 1140 for FB60?
    Regards,
    Shridhar
    Edited by: Shridhar Sawant on Nov 2, 2011 2:23 PM

    Hi Ramesh,
    In the SAP Std. setting of Formula we are maintaining one more line for same TAX TYPE + TAX CODE + COUNTRY combination but for the ending date of lower rate tax deduction.
    Since there is no "To date" option in Formula setting, we are maintaining one more line For e.g. in the 1st line we have a date as 01.04.2011 (i.e. Valid from) and in the other line we have mentioned date as 01.01.2012 (i.e. To date) since Vendor is having the lower rate tax deduction certificate uptill 31.12.2011.
    In the first line of formula (Valid from 01.04.2011) we have maintain :
    To Base amt              W/tax    Reduction base amt.
    175,000.00                 3.00               -
    9,999,999,999.00     10.00     175,000.00
    In the second line (Valid from 01.01.2012) of formula we have maintain :
    To Base amt             W/tax    Reduction base amt.
    9,999,999,999.00    10.00               -
    Cross confirming the various scenarios since date accumulation of tax setting is on in Tax Type that we are considering.
    Will confirm to you the change suggest by you.
    If these changes doesn't work then we have to go to the option of User exit or BTE for MIRO and FB60 testing.
    Have any idea about the above mention settings ?
    Regards,
    Shridhar

Maybe you are looking for