Tax - MIRO and FB60

Experts,
We are in the processing of migrating a Co Cd from Non-SAP system to SAP System and we were planning to take care of the tax thing manually for now and then have it automised.
However it looks like when you are doing FB60 - You can enter the tax manually as a line item where as when you are doing MIRO, as it is done based on a PO, we cannot enter it manually - Can somebody confirm this ? Or is there anyway we can enter an line item manually at MIRO ?
All answers/views would be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
Thanks,
Nandita

In MIRO, you can enter manually in GL account & Material tab.
Also, you can change the tax code in the selected item under PO reference tab.
Regards,
Amol

Similar Messages

  • Reference filed length in MIRO and FB60 should be increased.

    Hi ,
    I have a problem with the reference filed in the transaction MIRO and FB60, needs to increase the field length from 16 to 19.
    Is it possible ? if so how we can we do that?
    We have got one idea to use existing Header text field for the reference field, then how to map the Header text field to reference field in the General Ledger?
    can you pls look into this and do the the needfull.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Phani.

    Hi,
    I think you can change field length for reference field. Goto domain XBLNR1 and change the length of the field.
    Or
    There is another common field (assignment field) in both the transactions FB60 and MIRO.
    This is field also additional information field for item. this field length is 18. You can use this field instead of changing length of reference field.
    You can see this field in FBL1N also.
    Regards,
    Chandra

  • BADI or Userexit for MIRO and FB60 for displaying an error message

    Hello,
    Could you please let me know the BADI or User Exit validation Bank House field and displaying an error message in MIRO and FB60?
    Thanks,
    Md

    Hi,
    you can try with badi MRM_HEADER_CHECK.
    in method HEADERDATA_CHECK you can do something like:
    IF sy-tcode = 'FB60' OR sy-tcode = 'MIRO'.
      IF I_RBKPV-HBKID = 'WHATEVER'.
    * for the message in MIRO you can use this fm
        DATA: gt_errtab0    TYPE TABLE OF mrm_errprot,
              gs_errtab0    TYPE mrm_errprot.
                CLEAR gs_errtab0.
                gs_errtab0-msgty = 'E'.
                gs_errtab0-msgid = 'ZXX'.
                gs_errtab0-msgno = '030'.
                gs_errtab0-source = 'Q'.
                APPEND gs_errtab0 TO gt_errtab0.
                CALL FUNCTION 'MRM_PROT_FILL'
                  TABLES
                    t_errprot = gt_errtab0.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    Best regards.

  • Payment Terms Display in MIRO and FB60

    SAP Security experts,
    I want to give access to the A/P clerks to only be able to display the payment terms and not be able to change it in MIRo and/or FB60.
    Anyone knows the authorization object for this
    Thank You for your help.

    In this activity you can define and edit field status variants and groups. You group several field status groups together in one field status variant. You assign the field status variants to a company code.
    You can also define and process field status groups. You must define a field status group in the company code-specific area of each G/L account. The field status group determines which fields are ready for input, which are required entry fields, and which are hidden during document entry.
    Field status variant 0001 is entered for company code 0001 in the standard SAP software. Field status groups are already defined for this variant.
    Other than this I dont think there are any transaction specific field status allocations.
    But, yes you can always use transaction variants as an option wherein you can create transaction variant using SHD0 for MIRO and FB60.
    Edited by: Subramaniam Iyer on Dec 16, 2008 8:50 AM

  • Display Payment Terms in MIRO and FB60

    FI Gurus,
    How can I restrict A/P clerks to only view payment terms when entering an invoice thru FB60 or MIRO.
    Thank You for your help,

    HI,
    You can build a transaction and screen variant using SHD0 and assign it to a user.
    Refer to the link below for more info:
    [Transaction Variant|http://www.mortenhjorthnielsen.dk/Security/transactionvariants.htm]
    Cheers.

  • Business Place in MIRO and FB60

    Hi friend,
    I input business place data by using FB60, I can see the data of bus. place update to the field of Branch number by using FB03.
    But why the data of bus. place can't be updated to the field of Branch number in FB03 when I input business place by using MIRO?
    Can someone tell me how to solve this issue?
    Thank advance.

    by myself

  • Mass cancellation of invoices Posted in MIRO and FB60

    Hello,
    Because of wrong VAT customizing in OB40, i have several invoices posted to wrong VAT G/L Account.
    Now the user need a solution to correct this situation.
    I proposed FB08, F.80, MR8M but this is not a good solution for the user because, if i reverse one of this wrong invoices, the system will post the reversal to the new G/L account that is recently corrected in OB40
    What is the solution in this case, manual G/L posting ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Just curious: why cannot you put the old 'wrong' account in OB40, reverse the invoices and then correct the assignment back?
    Regards,
    Eli
    P.S. By the way, I'm not that sure that, during the reversal the systme will 'derive' the account; I believe, it should simply make a reversal posting on the accounts of original documents.

  • MIRO vs FB60

    Hi all
    I have a question regarding MIRO and FB60
    The standard procedure to creating invoice is : ME21N --> MIGO --> MIRO
    but in our office there was situation like this :
    after MIGO, some user create invoice using FB60 so there is no link between PO and Invoice itself and the MIGO still open and waiting to be invoiced.
    We don't know how it happen, not all the invoice treated like that
    My question is: how to prevent users to create another invoice (duplicate invoice) using MIRO? Because the invoice already done using FB60
    Thanks a lot
    Regards,
    Della

    Hi Della,
    If there was some requirement then it can be handle, but principally this is not good practice, as you told that after MIGO, some user create invoice using FB60, see what entries you are doing.
    Entry at MIGO:
    Expense A/c    100
                GR/IR clr A/c   100
    Entry through FB60:
    Expense A/c    100
                           Vendor    100
    In this case your user booking double expense one at the time of MIGO and other one is directly in FI by FB60. Furthermore Open was there in GR/IR clearing account.
    If it was requirement, to book invoice through FB60 after MIGO, although it can be handle, so you can use MR11 to reverse the expense booked at the time of MIGO, in this case your stock value will be zero but the quantity will remain there, after that you have to adjust your stock value manually by MR21.
    Thanks
    Javed

  • Enhancement Field at Header level of MIRO doc & FB60 doc

    Hello
    We have required a field at MRIO or FB60 details tab, if an enhancement are available so that help me.
    Regards
    avijit

    Hi
    You can use Badi BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01
    If you have a look at badi BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01 in se18 you´ll see that there is an example implementation class named CL_EXM_IM_BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01 .
    Read carefully as well the documentation of BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01.
    This will work for both MIRO and FB60
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • Validations for FB70, FB75 and FB60, MIRO without Tax Codes

    Hi,
    can u help on the below issue.
    I want to restrict the users while posting(FB70, FB75 and FB60, MIRO) without tax codes, please provide Validations for the same.
    Block AR/AP for postings without tax code - AR is FB70 and FB75 - AP is FB 60 and MIRO
    Thanks&regards,
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    Please check below validations for FB60 AND MIRO ,FB70 AND FB75
    Prerequisite
    BKPF-BUKRS = 'xxxx' AND SYST-TCODE = 'FB60'
    OR SYST-TCODE = 'FB75' OR SYST-TCODE = 'FB70'
    OR SYST-TCODE = 'MIRO'
    Check
    BSEG-MWSKZ
    Please check ,
    NARESH

  • Capturing service tax categories during FB60/MIRO

    Hi
    This is with reference to the service tax categories, which is required during monthly return in India.
    To the best of my knowledge, SAP does not have any standard solution to capture these servie tax categories during transaction entry till date.
    There are almost 102 categories defined by Govt of India for different kind of services. These categories are need to cature during transaction and will used later in filling return.
    I am trying to find a filed which is available in FB60/MIRO and FBL3N so that what transaction recorded in service tax payble GL, will have trace of services.
    Please suggest which filed i should use in FB60 or MIRO, which will have F4 help and also appear in FBL3N.
    Please reply.
    Regards
    DD

    Hi DD,
    We have solved a similar problem using text keys. Under SPRO GL Accounting -> Business transactions -> GL Account postings -> Carry out and check document settings -> Define texts for line items, define keys for service tax categories like ST1, ST2 with descriptions. These can be selected from F4 help and entered by the user during invoice entry. You can see them in FBL3N, filter and sub-total it.
    Regards
    Sharabh

  • Withholding tax not calculating in MIRO and calculating in F-43

    Hi,
    Whenever I am positng invoice thru F-43, Calculating withholding tax amount and generating seperate line item for that.
    But for same vendor after posting MM cycle( PO - GR -MIRO) and I am posting Invoice thru MIRO  WHT line item not generating while simulating and also after posting.
    Checks done :
    1. In vendor master data Liable check box is ticked and Tax codes are properly maintained.
    2. Minimun and maximum amounts checked.
    3.Base amounts checked.
    4. Formula for WHT checked
    5. I feel if these setting are not good,it should not post in F-43 also. But it is posting in F-43.
    Kinldy tell me any specific setting for calculating the WHT thru transaction MIRO
    Thanks in advance

    Shankar,
    Thanks for reply.
    If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
    I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
    I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E  SP 22   to 4.7 E  SP30.
    My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
    If any suitable answer appreciatable.
    Thanks once again for your reply.

  • Issue with down payment tax cal and clearing it aganest vendor inv

    HI,
    I have an issue with down payment tax cal.
    1.     I had configured withholding tax and raised down payment, tax has been cal
    2.     In the next step I had raised inv, at this time also tax had been cal
    3.     When I am doing down payment clearing the tax collected at the time of down payment had to be reversed but itu2019s not.
    Can any one give me solution for clearing the tax that cal on down payment.
    Thanking you.

    Dear
    Vendor master has got tax codes both at the time of payment and at the time of invoice.  Hence system is calculating tds on both occassions. 
    Since you pay advance first tds calculated is right.  Now while doing miro remove the tax codes manually and do miro/mir7/fb60.
    If already MIRO/MIR7/FB60 done then reverse the invoice document and clear the tax GL accounts.
    Regards

  • Withholding tax code and Withholding tax type relation

    Hi All,
    Here is my requirement:
    I need to get the WT code description for the tax codes I get in BSIS (BSIS-QSSKZ). The problem is when I try to get the same from T059ZT, I need to have the two key fields WITHT (Indicator for withholding tax type) & WT_WITHCD (Withholding tax code).
    But from BSIS I am having only the field QSSKZ (Withholding Tax Code)and not the WT type.
    I need to know, how can I get the WT type based on WT code? I tried WITH_ITEM but its of no use, as it has both these fields as key fields.
    Thanks in advcane.
    Anand

    Hi,
    Hi,
    I am working on an enhancement for withholding tax.
    The withholding tax base has to be calculated in the exit.
    I found that MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE is the badi which can be implemented and can contain the logic for the calculation.
    The transaction MIRO calls this BADI.But I need to call the BADI even for FB60,FB65,F-43,F-41 and F10.Is this part of configuration.Please let me know how to enhance the withholding tax calculation.
    Thanks,
    guest

  • Is it possible to use a tax code in FB60 but which does not post any tax?

    Hello Gurus,
    Can you advise if it is possible to configure a tax code which can be selected in FB60. But we want this tax code not to post any tax value in SAP but simply to be allowed to be selected and populated in the doucment. In FTXP a tax code can be setup that does not need to have a tax rate % maintained against it or be linked to a GL account. However, this tax code cannot then be used in FB60 as the system asks that a rate is maintained and then that an account must be maintained.
    Can you advise if it is possible to maintain a tax code in such a way that it can be selected in FB60 but does not result in any tax posting to any tax account? We want it so that no value is posted, so even a 0% rate would not be good.
    Thanks for any ideas on this.
    Mart

    If you set up 0% tax code, system will NOT post any entry to GL account. You can use the tax code in FB60 & MIRO & PO too.
    thanx

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem in activating 0sd_c03 IC

    Hi all Here i am facing problem in activating BC IC 0sd_c03 .I have installed the IC with data flow  before  and when i migrate from 3.5 to 7 . here for the datasource 2lis_13_vditm , the transfer rules are migrated successfully but here i am getting

  • Query execution in RSRT enter debugger session.

    Hello Gurus , I have a query created on a standard ODS. When I execute the query in RSRT ,it executes fine. I have a 'date 'characteristic in Free characteristic section of query designer. When I try to drill down according to that date,execution of

  • How to have custom js functions?

    I have a javascript function defined in Javascript field and is called from a button onClick. It is working fine. This javascript function is used in few forms. So I created a new file customjs.js in the includes folder and removed the Javascript fie

  • I need to download the CS4 Design Premium Suite

    ok... so I've been on the phone and in chat with Apple Tech support most of my day. I simply need to uninstall and re-install my CS4 suite. I have not opened the box with the DVD's since the original install and of course - the DVD's don't want to ru

  • This is a bug, right?

    Hi all, I am gettting a NotSerializableException (Shown Below) from a JFileChooser sub-class -- because JFilerChooser implements java.io.Serializable, this is a bug right? TIA, ablivian23 java.io.NotSerializableException: javax.swing.JFileChooser$Wea