MIRO with Expense item..

Dear Friends,
As I know, when we post an invoice through MIRO, the accounting document will be as follow:
Dr. GR/IR account
Cr. Vendor
But here I found a weird case... when we post a MIRO, the accounting document created is:
Dr. GR/IR account
Cr. Vendor
Dr. Expense/Inventory ==> with amount 0 in CL amount and some value in LC2 currency,
why there's inventory/expense line in the document only with value in LC2?
please help.
thanks,
Balaji

Hi,
In general this case arise when you have exchange rate differences.
It is very likely that your PO is not create in the Company Code Currency so when you do the GR the Receipt is valuated at certain exchange rate.
Sometiem after the exchange rate change and you decide to enter the Invoice with the new exchange rate in order to match all the accouning properly the cost of the exchange rate difference was sent to the Material / Expense account.
You can check this changing the exchange rate in MIRO eventhought there is no exchange rate change!!! (For your understanding)
Kind regards,
Federico

Similar Messages

HT3302 My granddaughter dropped her ipodtouch 5th generation in the toilet, i put it in rice, and have put back on charge after 2 weeks and it is not charging or turning on, for such an expensive item, surely it can be fixed, can anyone help me with this

My granddaughter dropped her ipod touch the generation in the toilet, i put it in rice for 2 weeks, have put on charge, but won,t charge or turn on, for such an expensive item, I was hoping that it can be fixed

iPod Repair
http://www.apple.com/support/ipod/service/prices/

Vendor report with expense G/L account

Hi,
My client needs a vendor balance report with expense G/L account. I mean against what expense account they made a payment to the vendor. There are no such standard reports available in SAP. So can some one suggest me how to get this report done.
Appreciate your response in advance.
Regards,
Sunny.

HI,
Though there is no Std. report for your requirement, you can add field of GL ACcount to reflect the expense accountin the line item display. However this will not be a total solultion for your requirement. But for a particular vendor analysis will become easy.
Path:
Financial Accounting> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable> Vendor Accounts> Line Items> Display Line Items> Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display
<b>Pl. Note: Consider whether you really need to enhance the line item display. Note that this enhancement can reduce performance, since the system has to read more table entries.</b>
Thanks
Vijay

Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail. When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######. Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as KSB1.
I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center. Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center? Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
Thanks,
Jeff

Thanks Christian,
We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element" checked. Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
For example:
expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250. The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000. When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000. We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000 and $250, $250 to 600000.
Thanks,
Jeff

Expense Item - Standard Purchase Order Import

Hi all,
I am using import standard purchase order - open interface to upload po from legacy system. I can do that with an inventory item, Can anybody tell me what are the mandatory column or requirements for an EXPENSE ITEM .
I have given destination_type_code='EXPENSE' in po_distributions_interface , and given category_id , description . Even then po is not created.
Its urgent.
Thanks
AADITYA

Hi
Do you have a copy of your insert statement?
regards

MIRO with reference to MIGO number

Hi All,
I want to have MIRO with respect to MIGO Number.
e.g
PO QTY 1000
GRN 1 -
10 Qty
GRN 2------5 Qty
Required scenario:
If we run MIRO then Qty would be 15 Qty
We have a requirement that MIRO is done GRN wise.
like for MIGO # 1 -
MIRO reflects 10 Qty
for MIGO #2----
MIRO reflects 5 qTY

Hi ,
In standard SAP it is not possible to select MIGO no to do MIRO .
Only you can use the Delivary note no. as reference for doing MIRO .
Else , purchase order is always taken as reference and non required line item is deselcted at the time of MIRO .
So please check how best you can use the filed delivary note in MIGO for doing MIRO .
Regards,
Dewang T.

While doing MIRO with unplaned cost system is picking accurel G/L account

Dear All,
While doing MIRO with unplaned delivery cost system is picking accural G/L account rather than cost element from PO.
Thanks
KMR

Hi,
It depeneds how the Unplanned Delivery Cost has been configured for the comany code.
SPRO>Material Management>LIV>Incoming Invoice>Configure Unplanned Delivery Cost.
Against Comapny Code put blank if : Unplanned delivery costs are distributed among the invoice items ( here the Materil account or the Account in the PO will be used. )
Put 2 if : Unplanned delivery costs are posted to a separate general ledger account ( here the posting key UPF will be used to determine the g/l account ).
Thanks and Regards

Posting MIRO with reference to MIGO document number

Hi,
Is there any way of posting a vendor invoice in MIRO, taking MIGO document number as the reference instead of PO or Delivery Note reference?
Muru

Hi,
In MIGO you mention the delivery note in the header part.
There is a drop down in MIRO transaction where we enter PO number, please check and you will find the "Delivery Note" option in the drop down list.
you can do the MIRO with reference to this Delivery Note number from this option.
(Just make sure, that you have selected the "GR based IR" indicator in the PO line item.)
Doiong MIRO with reference to material document number of MIGO is not possible in standatd SAP.
Regards,
Gaurav

Customer/Vendor A/C with line item details and with opening and closing Bal

Dear Sir / Madam,
Is it possible to have a customer and / or vendor Sub-Ledger account-
with line item details and with opening and closing balance detail
for a particular period.?
Regards
Chirag Shah
I thank for the given below thread which has solved the same problem for G/L Account
Re: Report to get the ledger printout with opening balances

Hello Srinujalleda,
Thanks for your precious time.
I tried the referred T-Code
But this report is not showing Opening balance, closing balance detail.
It only gives transactions during the specified posting period and total of it.
Please guide me further in case if I need to give proper input at selection screen or elsewhere.
Client Requires Report in a fashion
Opening Balance as on Date
+ / - Transactions during the period
= Closing Balance as on date
As that of appearing for G/L Account by S_ALR_87012311
Thanks once again & Regards
Chirag Shah

Posting to G/L accounts with open item management not permitted Fagl_post

Dear Expert,
When i run the foreign cur rev. through FAGL_FC_VAL then system is not post the currency rev on open item on GL account. It showing subject message and also show below mesaage:-
Message no. FAGL_POST_SERVICE012
Diagnosis
You use GL account 210012 in company code 1000 with open item management. However, posting are not permitted G/L accounts in individual ledger with open item management.
Please advice on this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Pankaj

Hello Pankaj,
Is your adjustment account was defiined as OI management. if yes, then t is generally not permitted to use the O/I managed account as an djustment account. The adjustment account is the same as O/I
managed GL account, so the error message FAGL_POST_SERVICE012 is issued. This is justified because open items must be made valid for ALL ledgers in the client but FAGL_FC_TRANS posts ledger specific posting by having ledger group in the document header - Ledger Grp 0L.
The best solution is to assign non-O/I managed account as an adjustment account, and this is the 'standard' solution.Please also check note 884639.
Best Regards,
Gladys xing

Account type M and G/L account with open item management not permitted

Hi,
I am getting the following error while applying VL02N (PGI) is "Account type M and G/L account with open item management not permitted". Before I got an error like posting period and I have closed those posting periods 2008/08 and 2008/07. Now I am getting this error.
Please provide the solutions to overcome this and I want to execute the full transaction.
Thanks in ADVANCE.
Kishore

Hi Kishore,
Please check these threads
Account type M and G/L account with open item management not permitted
Re: Account type M& GL with open item managment not permitted error
Posting to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted
Hope this would help you.
Good luck
Narin

Contract Release value is not updated with Limit item value

We have SRM 4.0 with ECS scenario.
Contract are created in SRM and replicated to ERP.
If we create PO with Service line and Limit line using contract in both of these line items, contract Release value is getting updated only with Service line item value.
But the contract Total value is the addition of Service and Limit value of PO.
Why Contract Release value is not getting updated with Limit item value. Please help as early as possible.

Hi Sandeep
Yes. there are various reasons .upon your contract incorrect status and linkage not establised / or more attachment in SRM GOA.
what type of contract are you using? GOA or CCTR
If it is GOA - which version of SRM and service pack ?are you in ?
If it is a GOA , BLAREL idoc might failed to post the release value in the SRM .
How contracts are created material / mat group ?
to fix or understand the issue, you need to recreate the issue.
what is the ERROR in BLAREL in SRM idoc monitoring ?

Problem with Line Item display of G/L account

Hi,
I am struggling with a typical problem that I have two company codes in two different countries. I have created a tax account with Open Item management and Line Item display in both the company codes.
When I am trying to post vendor invoices, taxes are being posted on line item wise in one company code but not doing so in other company code eventhough the attributes of the G/L account are same.
G/L accounts, tax condition types and account keys are same in both the cases.
Can any body give me an idea to fix the problem.
thanks in advance,
Mallik

HI,
check the condition types you've defined for the both of the countries
sprofin accting-f/a gl sett-tax on sales/pur -basic settings-check cal procd--define cond types
there is a check box named item condition see whether it is ticked for the another company's condn type.
because due to this only it takes the condn item wise.
reward pts if it helps.
Regards

How to reverse a FI document with line item that is cleared

Dear All,
I have similar problem like the previous post here:
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=6017563&messageID=3142217
the difference is, the document was posted several months before.
In March, there is 2 vendor document with 3 item, say 100001 and 100002.
the document 100001 is false and changed with 100002 but 100001 is not reversed.
In April, item 3 of document 100001 is cleared with document 200001.
this is wrong because the cleared item should be in document 100002.
this problem is known in October.
How do we fix this problem?
Thank you All.
Regards,
Fatah.

Hi,
Use <b>Tr. Code: FBRA</b> give document number if you want reset then click on reset or if you want reverse the click reverse.
this solution is sufficient for you problem.

FBL5 FIAR - exception aggregation - count customers with open items at key

Hello gurus,
I have read the information about counting all values in reference to a characteristic. I manage to count how many customers have a FIAR open item 'billing status' = Open in my FIAR cube.
Now I am asked to replicate transaction FBL5 of R3. This transaction will give you open items at a given key date by adding
the items with
A) Item status = 'O' and posting date <= key date
and the items with
B) Item status = 'C' and posting date < =key date and clearing date > key date.
I calculate the net value by creating 2 restricted key figures and then adding them in a CKF.
But for counting I have a problem. I can count how many customer make up the open items (case A)
and how many customers makeup items that where cleared between key date and today.(case B).
But I cannot sum the two numbers as there might be customers that are counted in both cases.
For example I have 4 customers that correspond to case A : 1000 1011, 1012 and 1014
And I have 3 customers that correspond to case B 1000 , 1011 and 1013
I would like to get 5 as the number of customers that verify either case A or case B (or both).
Is there a way to do this with the exception 'aggregation 'and 'count all values' property of CKF ?
Claudio

Hi,
The logic given in the above post may be a bit confusing to you. Check out this explanation and try to understand what I mean.
Posting Date - PD
Key Date - KD
Clearing Date - CD
PD--KD--
CD
-O(Status)-C--O-----C
-5107-----8
Let me explain the above table.
Between PD & KD there are 5 count with status'O' and 10 counts with status 'C'.
Between KD & CD there are c counts with status 'O' & 8 counts with status 'C'.
This means 5 with status 'C' becomes 7 between KD & CD.
Similarly, 10 status with 'O' becomes 8.
The logic I am trying to say is..
If you don't want to get counts with status 'C'(repeated) as I understood) 7-5 = 2. Show this 2 as count for status 'C' between KD & CD.
So the table will become like this now.
PD--KD--
CD
-O(Status)-C--O-----C
-5102(7)---2(8).
In braces shown are the total with status 'O'/'C' for the dates.
I hope this will solve your problem.
Message was edited by: AVR - IGA

MIRO with Expense item..

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for