MIssing functionality outlook add-on: choosing a partner for an appointment

Hi,
Excuse me for my bad english.
in outlook add-on when we link Business partner to activity, its impossible to access quickly to the partner. My customer has a lot of partners (300+), it's very long to choose a partner in the list (we just can slide down and up the list).
Version:
SAP Business One 2007 A
Description of requirements:
search capabilities in the box for linking business partners in Outlook Add-on.
Valid as of: January 6th, 2009
Business needs:
sales representatives which have a lot of meetings and rdv to fulfill, can not use SAp Bo via outlook. The time to select the business partners is very long and they lost productivity.
Current Workaround:
We have no solution now to solve it
Proposed solution:
SAP improve the Outlook Integration functionality by adding search capabilities in the box "select a partner" like it is in SAP BO.
Thanks.

Hi,
Same problem exists in TP4 as well. And section in documentation for this topic is wrong (Figure 29-34 and Section 29.5.1.2). Figures in Section 29.5.1.2 are for Individual Pages, but not for ADF Task Flows.
Regards,
Andrejus

Similar Messages

Missing function detour to the mode Drive/Walk for...

Hello
Nokia maps and Nokia Drive+ Beta for Lumia, missing function detour to the mode Drive/Walk. This feature allows you to calculate an alternative route.
Nokia Lumia 820
Rm 825
Firmware version : 8.0.10211.0
Product code : eu_europe_2_252
Imei : 354105053176656
Operator : Swisscom

So you have the files in two places now right???
Easy right click the top level Folders in the Library, select Update Folder Location and navigate to the Folder on the new drive. You will lose nothing. If you have reimported for some reason you will need to go back to an earlier back up catalog and use that to do what I have stated earlier.

Missing Functionality -where do I set a budget for a Project?

Budgeting for Projects is non - existent
Budget for Profit and Loss for a particular project , How is it done ?
Does not work , No facility to put in Budget for a project ?
The report I am trying to run is:
REPORTS>FINANCIAL>BUDGET REPORTS>Profit and Loss Statement Budget Report.Then go to Expanded and choose a PROJECT, say MailOrder.
The result is that it will show the MailOrder project for the ACTUAL but it will show the whole company Turnover against the BUDGET column.
This is because there is no place to set a budget for MailOrder Project in the first place. So the question is where do I set a budget for a Project?
1 Budget setup screen - this has no facility to setup a budget for a PROJECT
2.Budget Profit and Loss - this has the facility to run a PROJECT budget but the figures for the Budget cannot be right because they were not setup in the first place.
PS MailOrder project is just an example.
Version: SAP BUSINESS ONE 2007 A Patch Level 41
Description of requirements: As above
(Valid as of: (Date that this legal requirement is applicable) N/A
Business needs: Customer cannot set the budget for a project and this effects their accounting.
Examples: (Please describe a typical example, how the functionality should work.)
Current Workaround: None.
Proposed solution: Create a Project and then be able to set a Budget for it
Edited by: Darpal Thiarha on May 14, 2008 10:34 AM

Hi Darpal/Kerstin
Please ignore my previous replies because I have now worked out why this idea will not work:
Kerstins' idea is based on setting up new Nominal Codes for every Project and for Every Nominal Code in the Profit and Loss structure. Apart from the fact that this will create a messy Nominal Structure with hundreds of Nominal Codes, the main issue here is the way the Cost Of Goods Sold is structured. The logic of our Nominal Structure for Sales and Cost of Goods is based on Item/Item Groups and the Nature of these Items. In our case we sell Skin Care products under 3 Brands. Say Brand A, B and C
So Brand A is summarised into one item Group and the ITEM GROUP is coded to Sales Nominal 20000 and the Cost of this group is coded to Nominal 30000. In Kertins suggestion, I would need to raise a Nominal Code 20001 for say Project Mail Order and 30001 for the Cost of Goods for Mail Order but this the Mail Order project is selling ALL our brands (A,B,C) - so you can see the problem here. You cannot use Nominal Codes for two different purposes and make it work. So the problem here is that my BRAND A summary will contain a Nominal with a Project Mail Order, that has SALES of Brand A,B,C. The Net effect will be that we will not be able to summarise anything in SALES and Cost of SALES in a logical way (Neither by Brand or By Project) and the Nominal Structure will be a mess.
My conclusion is that SAP b1 Sales and Cost of Goods section demands certain logic when building the Nominal Codes, and this is based on the NATURE OF THE STOCK ITEM and trying to superimpose the PROJECT issue into this, will never work. In my view, the PROJECT issue needs to be sorted without involving New Nominal codes and the starting point would be in sorting out the SALES and COST of SALES and the project Budget for this.
Please let me know if you need further illustration of the problem.

Cutom Outlook Add-in is conflicting with SalesForce's Outlook add-in

Hello,
We've developed one custom MS outlook add-in and installed it for Microsoft Outlook 2013.
It is failing with some of the functionalities where SalesForce's Outlook add-in is deployed and activated.
As soon as user deactivates it, our custom add-in runs as expected.
Technical details:
In our custom outlook add-in, we've attached an event handler with MailItem's SENT folder's ItemAdded event.
The code of this event gets triggered and do the job only when user disables the SalesForce's Outlook add-in.
Can anybody please advise how to get rid of this conflict? It's really urgent.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Ankit
Thanks, Ankit Shah <hr> Inkey Solutions, India. <hr> Microsoft Certified Business Management Solutions Professionals <hr> http://ankit.inkeysolutions.com

Hello Dmitry,
Thank you for the response.
I would like to explain the flow again -
1. I have given a custom button in the ribbon - "Send"
2. On click of that button, I add a custom property to my mail item object & call the .Send() method on it.
3. Eventually, I get my "Application_ItemSend" event handler called where I check for the custom property on the mailItem & if found, I attach the "ItemAdd" handler as
below -
//Attach the Event Handler.
mailItemSendFolder = mailItem.SaveSentMessageFolder;
mailItemSendFolder.Items.ItemAdd += SentItems_ItemAdd;
4. In ideal situation, my "SentItems_ItemAdd" is getting called. But on machine where we have this salesforce add-in enabled/active, this event handler is not getting called &
hence, my functionality is not getting executed.
Hope, I have made the implementation more clear.
Request you to please feel free to come up with any additional queries (if any).
Thanks.
Thanks, Ankit Shah <hr> Inkey Solutions, India. <hr> Microsoft Certified Business Management Solutions Professionals <hr> http://ankit.inkeysolutions.com

Missing functionality: Business Partner Authorization -Read only is missing

Version: SAP Business One 2007 A (8.00.177) SP:00 PL:38
Description of requirements:
Im missing the functionality -read only- at the authorisation to change the Business Partners
It should be
Leads: Full authorisation / no authorisation / read only
Customers: Full authorisation / no authorisation / read only
Suppliers: Full authorisation / no authorisation / read only
Is there any way to implement these feature?
Thanks
Ludmilla Hauk
Edited by: Ludmilla Hauk on Jul 29, 2008 10:34 AM

Hi
I have implemented the same in SAP B1 2005B, what I did is
I have given the Read Only authorization for Business Partner and I have given the Full Authorization for BP Type (under Busniess Partner) Customer and Lead
So, when the specific user logs into the system and open the Business Partner Master screen, the Add option will be disabled for the user and in find mode he/she can find only the Customer or Lead. And after that when he/she chose any BP, he/she can only view.
Thanks
Anjan Bhowmick
New-Age Business Consultants
Bangalore, India

MS Project 2010 with Outlook 2013 - "send as attachment" missing function / not working

Office 2013 Professional running on Windows 7 (64bit).
After Re-installing MS Project 2010 today the option under
File (alt-f) --> 'Save & Send' --> 'Send as Attachment' is shaded out / unavailable.
Is this a known integration gap between the older MS Project and Current Outlook ? Alternatively, does anyone have any recommendations to troubleshoot and / or enable the function within MS Project 2010?
Thanks for any suggestions , guidance or pointers.
p.s I have tried completing a repair on Office 2013 and the MS Project 2010 from within the control panel.
This functionality is working with all other Office 2013 applications in the suite (Excel, PowerPoint, Word, Visio etc.)

Julie ,
Kinda / sorta ... In Mid 2014 I had MS Project installed and working (I can't confirm if the Send as Attachment was working at that time...) A few days ago I was sent an '.mpp' (MS Project file) for review. When I attempted to open it MS Project
gave me a warning message that it needed to start in safe mode but then failed to start. This seemed weird and thus began two days of googling and investigation.
I elected to uninstall (which also failed) and reinstall (which also failed) the MS Project 2010 since I have the media at hand to do so. At this point I was really truly 'stuck' (p.c term for the younger audience reading this).
My course of action was to engage Microsoft Support (specifically the MS Office group). They verified some registry entries, confirmed installation of MS Project 2010 , confirmed files were installed , available and in the appropriate
spots (files etc.) , tried a few 'fixit' tools , made multiple suggestions that I spend $1000+ on upgrading to MS Project 2013. After ~90 minutes or so they were able to 'Force' the orphaned installation to uninstall. (although
they needed to install and use a 3rd party tool to do it) We then re-installed MS Project 2010 and verified it could start.
After using project a little bit I realized that 'Send as Attachment' option was non-functional. I spent a few hours trying to research (more google) and finally threw in the towel and cried out for help (i.e posted the message that started this
thread).
Thanks again for any suggestions or wisdom you are willing to share.

Object Reference Not Set To An Instance Of An Object - Outlook Add-In - Add-In Express

Hi,
My Add-In has been developed in VS2010 using the Add-In Express pack.
Its a very simple add-in that shows an IT support ticket email detailing PC information. To use it, following installing the add-in, the user must select the tab in outlook and click on the Send IT Support Email button which will generate an Outlook Email
Template with specific information about the PC that I pull using VB.
It works fine in Windows 7 & 8, but throws an 'Object Reference Not Set To An Instance Of An Object' exception in Windows XP. Screenshot is shown below:
The code is below
Imports System.Runtime.InteropServices
Imports System.ComponentModel
Imports System.Drawing
Imports System.Windows.Forms
Imports AddinExpress.MSO
Imports System.Object
Imports System.Net
Imports System.Environment
Imports System.Net.NetworkInformation
Imports System.Windows.Forms.Application
Imports Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook
Imports outlook = Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook
'Add-in Express Add-in Module
<GuidAttribute("735B7BC8-DD2F-44D8-BC37-30D86769C065"), ProgIdAttribute("$safeprojectname$.AddinModule")> _
Public Class AddinModule
Inherits AddinExpress.MSO.ADXAddinModule
#Region " Add-in Express automatic code "
'Required by Add-in Express - do not modify
'the methods within this region
Public Overrides Function GetContainer() As System.ComponentModel.IContainer
If components Is Nothing Then
components = New System.ComponentModel.Container
End If
GetContainer = components
End Function
<ComRegisterFunctionAttribute()> _
Public Shared Sub AddinRegister(ByVal t As Type)
AddinExpress.MSO.ADXAddinModule.ADXRegister(t)
End Sub
<ComUnregisterFunctionAttribute()> _
Public Shared Sub AddinUnregister(ByVal t As Type)
AddinExpress.MSO.ADXAddinModule.ADXUnregister(t)
End Sub
Public Overrides Sub UninstallControls()
MyBase.UninstallControls()
End Sub
#End Region
Public Shared Shadows ReadOnly Property CurrentInstance() As AddinModule
Get
Return CType(AddinExpress.MSO.ADXAddinModule.CurrentInstance, AddinModule)
End Get
End Property
Private Sub AddInModule_AddInInitiatize(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) _
Handles MyBase.AddinInitialize
'Outlook 2010 = 14
If Me.HostMajorVersion >= 14 Then
AdxOlExplorerCommandBar1.UseForRibbon = False
End If
End Sub
Public ReadOnly Property OutlookApp() As Outlook._Application
Get
Return CType(HostApplication, Outlook._Application)
End Get
End Property
'Gets the MAC Address from the NIC Information
Function getMacAddress()
Dim nics() As NetworkInterface = _
NetworkInterface.GetAllNetworkInterfaces
Return nics(0).GetPhysicalAddress.ToString
End Function
Sub CreateTemplate()
Dim sHostName As String
Dim sDomain As String
Dim sUserName As String
Dim sOS As String
Dim s64 As String
Dim sMAC As String
Dim host As String = System.Net.Dns.GetHostName()
Dim LocalHostaddress As String = System.Net.Dns.GetHostEntry(host).AddressList(1).ToString()
Dim MyItem As Outlook.MailItem
'Finds the PC Number
sHostName = Environ$("computername")
'Finds the Domain
sDomain = Environ$("userdomain")
'Finds the Username logged into the PC
sUserName = (Environment.UserDomainName & "\" & Environment.UserName)
'Finds the Operating System
sOS = (My.Computer.Info.OSFullName)
'Shows the results collected from the getMacAddress Function in the sMac variable
sMAC = getMacAddress()
'Finds the Architecture of the Operating System - x86 or x64
If (Environment.Is64BitOperatingSystem) Then
s64 = ("64bit")
Else
s64 = ("32bit")
End If
'Creates a Template Email
MyItem = OutlookApp.CreateItem(Outlook.OlItemType.olMailItem)
'Configures the Sender as [email protected]
MyItem.To = "[email protected]"
'Shows the template
MyItem.Display()
'Shows all of the string in the Email Body
MyItem.HTMLBody = String.Concat("IT SUPPORT TICKET", " ", "<tr>PC Number: </tr>", sDomain, "\", sHostName, "", " ", "Username: ", sUserName, "", " ", "OS Version: ", sOS, s64, "", " ", "IP Address: ", LocalHostaddress, "", " ", "MAC Address: ", sMAC, "", " ", "Comment:", " ", "Please give a brief description of your problem attaching a screen shot if possible", " ") & MyItem.HTMLBody
End Sub
Private Sub AdxRibbonButton1_OnClick(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal control As IRibbonControl, ByVal pressed As Boolean) Handles AdxRibbonButton1.OnClick
'Runs CreateTemplate
CreateTemplate()
End Sub
Private Sub AdxCommandBarButton1_Click(ByVal sender As Object) Handles AdxCommandBarButton1.Click
'Runs CreateTemplate
CreateTemplate()
End Sub
End Class
I would appreciate any help with this whatsoever as I am pulling my hair out!!
Many Thanks!!
Chris

Hi,
Welcome to MSDN forum.
I am afraid that the issue is out of support range of VS General Question forum which mainly discusses
the usage of Visual Studio IDE such as WPF & SL designer, Visual Studio Guidance Automation Toolkit, Developer Documentation and Help System
and Visual Studio Editor.
Because your Add-in is developed using Add-in Express which is third-party, I suggest consulting Add-in Express forum:
http://www.add-in-express.com/forum/index.php for better support.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Choose Valid partner bank type - F110 issue

Hello,
We are facing the following issue while running payment program in F110.
Choose valid partner bank type ZFBAREP 005
Error in creating the payment document; read job log FZ 305
The message ZFBAREP 005 is the customized substitution message to update partner bank type field while posting invoices.
How this message triggering when exectuing F110.
where we need to check the triggering point of this message.
regards,
Bramhendra

Chintan,
my question is where is the call function of the sustitution in the program F110.
regards,
Bramhendra

Adobe pdfmaker 6.0 is missing in Outlook 2003

Hi,
I have users running XP Pro with Office Small Business 2003 with SBS 2003 server. I have some users at this point that doesn't have pdfmaker toolbar in their Outlook 2003 but appear in Word 2003. We have Adobe Standard 6.0. As per the user, they had it but now the pdfmaker is missing from outlook 2003. However in the mean time they can print to Adobe PDF from "File" menu on top left and select "Print" then selecting "Adobe PDF" to email file to
pdf. How can I enable or get the pdfmaker back on Outlook 2003. Word and Excel have pdfmaker toolbar appear.
I did the following steps:
I checked the disabled item and nothing was listed. then I checked in "Add-In Manager" and "COM Add-Ins" and didn't see pdfmaker or something like that. I even tried to add "PDFMOultook.dll" in "COM Add-Ins" from Adobe folder and that didn't get added. Then I removed "OutlVisible" key or changed the data value to 0 and rebooted the PC. But that didn't do anything, so I restore the registry that I backed up. I even reinstalled Adobe Standard 6 and the whole office in the beginning. Hope someone has another solution for this.
Thanks,
Ankur

There is a patch - but whether it will fix your particular problem, I don't know.
More details here:
http://blogs.adobe.com/insidesound/2012/07/adobe-audition-cs6-5-0-1-update-patch-released. html#.UFyg0q7F03g

OWB bugs, missing functionality and the future of OWB

I'm working with OWB for some time now and there are a lot of rough edges to discover. Functionality and stability leave a lot to be desired. Here's a small and incomplete list of things that annoy me:
Some annoying OWB bugs (OWB 10g 10.1.0.2.0):
- The debugger doesn't display the output parameters of procedures called in pre-mapping processes (displays nothing, treats values as NULL). The mapping itself works fine though.
- When calling selfmade functions within an expression OWB precedes the function call with a constant "Functions." which prevents the function from being executed and results in an error message
- Occasionally OWB cannot open mappings and displays an error message (null pointer exception). In this case the mapping cannot be opened anymore.
- Occasionally when executing mappings OWB doesn't remember changes in mappings even when the changes were committed and deployed
- When using aggregators in mappings OWB scrambles the order of the output attributes
- The deployment of mappings sometimes doesn't work. After n retries it works without having changed anything in the mapping
- When recreating an external table directly after dropping the table OWB recreates the external table but always displays both an error message and a success message.
- In Key Lookups the screen always gets garbled when selecting an attribute as a join condition
- Usage of constants results in aborts in the debugger
- When you reconcile a table used in a key lookup the lookup condition sometimes changes. OWB seems to remember only the position of the lookup condition attribute but not the name.
- In the process of validating a mapping often changes in the mapping get lost and errors occur like 'Internal Errors' or 'Null Pointer Exceptions'.
- When you save the definition of external tables OWB always adds 2 whitespace columns to the beginning of all the lines following 'ORGANISATION EXTERNAL'. If you save a lot of external table definitions you get files with hundreds of leading whitespaces.
Poor or missing functionality:
- No logging on the level of single records possible. I'd like the possibility to see the status of each single record in each operator like using 'verbose data' in PowerCenter
- The order of the attributes cannot be changed. This really pisses me off expecially if operators like the aggregator scramble the order of attributes.
- No variables in expressions possible
- Almost unusable lookup functionality (no cascading lookups, no lookup overrides, no unconnected lookups, only equal condition in key lookups)
- No SQL overrides in soruces possible
- No mapplets, shared containers or any kind a reusable transformations
- No overview functionality for mappings. Often it's very hard to find a leftover operator in a big mapping.
- No copy function for attributes
- Printing functionality is completely useless
- No documentation functionality for mappings (reports)
- Debugger itself needs debugging
- It's very difficult to mark connections between attributes of different operations. It's almost impossible to mark a group of connections without marking connections you don't want to mark.
I really wonder which of the above bugs and mssing functionality 'Paris' will address. From what I read about 'Paris' not many if at all. If Oracle really wants to be a competitor (with regard to functionality) to Informatica, IBM/Ascential etc. they have a whole lot of work to do or purchase Informatica or another of the leading etl tool
vendors.
What do you think about OWB? Will it be a competitor for the leading etl tools or just a cheap database add on and become widely used like SAB BW not for reasons of technology or functionality but because it's cheap?
Looking forward to your opinions.
Jörg Menker

Thanks to you two for entertaining my thoughts so far. Let me respond to you latest comments.
Okay, lets not argue which one is better.. when a tool is there .. then there are some reasons to be there...But the points raised by Jorg and me are really very annoying. Overall I agree with both yours and Jorg's points (and I did not think it was an argument...merely sharing our observations with each other (;^)
The OWB tool is not as mature as Informatica. However, Informatica has no foothold in the database engine itself and as I mentioned earlier, is still "on the outside looking in..." The efficiency and power of set-based activity versus row-based activity is substantial.
Looking at it from another way lets take a look at Microstrategy as a way of observing a technical strategy for product development. Microstrategy focused on the internals (the engine) and developed it into the "heavy-lifting" tool in the industry. It did this primarily by leveraging the power of the backend...the database and the hosting server. For sheer brute force, it was champion of the day. It was less concerned with the pretty presentation and more concerned with getting the data out of the back-end so the user didn't have to sit there for a day and wait. Now they have begun to focus on the presentation part.
Likewise this seems to be the strategy that Oracle has used for OWB. It is designed around the database engine and leverages the power of the database to do its work. Informatica (probably because it needs to be all things to all people) has tended to view the technical offerings of the database engine as a secondary consideration in its architectural approach and has probably been forced to do so more now that Oracle has put themselves in direct competition with Informatica. To do otherwise would make their product too complex to maintain and more vendor-specific.
I am into the third data warehousing/data migration project and my previous two have been on Informatica (3 years on it).I respect your experience and your opinions...you are not a first timer. The tasks we have both had to solve and how we solved them with these tools are not necessarily the same. Could be similar in instances; could be quite different.
So the general tendency is to evaluate the tool and try to see how things that were needed to be done in my previous projects can be done with this tool. I am afraid to say .. I am still not sure how these can be implemented in OWB. The points raised by us are probably the fall out of this deficiency.One observation that I would make is that in my experience, calls to the procedural language in the database engine have tended to perform very poorly with Informatica. Informatica's scripting language is week. Therefore, if you do not have direct usability of a good, strong procedural language to tackle some complicated tasks, then you will be in a pickle when the solution is not well suited to a relational-based approach. Informatica wants you to do most things outside of the database (in the map primarily). It is how you implement the transformation logic. OWB is built entirely around the relational, procedural, and ETL components in the Oracle database engine. That is what the tool is all about.
If cost is the major factor for deciding a tool then OWB stands far ahead...Depends entirely on the client and the situation. I have implemented solutions for large companies and small companies. I don't use a table saw to cut cake and I don't use a pin knife to fall trees. Right tool for the right job.
...thats what most managers do .. without even looking how in turn by selecting such a tool they make the life tough for the developers.Been there many times. Few non-technical managers understand the process of tool evaluation and selection and the value a good process adds to the project. Nor do they understand the implications of making a bad choice (cost, productivity, maintainability).
The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.If you are primarily a GUI-based implementer that is true. However, I have often found that when I have been brought in to fix performance problems with Informatica implementations that the primary problem is usually with the way that the developer implemented it. Too often I have found that the developer understands how to implement logic in the GUI component (the Designer/Maps and Sessions) with a complete lack of understanding of how all this activity will impact load performance (they don't understand how the database engine works.) For example, a strong feature in Informatica is the ability to override the default SQL statement generated by Informatica. This was a smart design decision on Informatica's part. I have frequently had to go into the "code" and fix bad joins, split up complex operations, and rip out convoluted logic to get the maps to perform within a reasonable load window. Too often these developers are only viewing the problem through the "window" of the tool. They are not stepping back and look at the problem in the context of the overall architecture. In part Informatica forces them to do this. Another possible factor is they probably don't know better.
"One tool...one solution"
Microstrategy until recently had been suffering from that same condition of not allowing the developer to create the actual query). OWB engineers need to rethink their strategy on overriding the SQL.
The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.In some ways yes. If you do a head-to-head comparison of the GUI then yes. In other ways OWB is better (Informatica does not measure up when you compare it with all of the architectural features that the Oracle database engine offers). They need to fix the bugs and annoyances though.
.. but even the GUI of Informatica is better than OWB and gives the developer some satisfaction of working in it.Believe me I feel your pain. On the other hand, I have suffered from Informatica bugs. Ever do a port from one database eingine to another just to have it convert everything into multi-byte? Ever have it re-define your maps to parallel processing threads when you didn't ask it to?
Looking at the technical side of things I can give you one fine example ... there is no function in Oracle doing to_integer (to_number is there) but Informatica does that ... Hmm-m-m...sorry, I don't get the point.
The style of ETL approach of Informatica is far more appealing.I find it unnecessarily over-engineered.
OWB has two advantages : It is basically free of cost and it has a big brother in Oracle.
It is basically free of cost...When you are another "Microsoft", you can throw your weight around. The message for Informatica is "don't bite the hand that feeds you." Bad decisions at the top.
Regards,
Dan Phillips

Partner function AP is not defined in partner procedure N ()

Hi,
Error: Partner function AP is not defined in partner procedure N ().
I am getting above error in CRM service orders for Contact person replication from CRM  ECC.
In debugging Middleware queue and we found that it is getting triggered from FM SD_PARTNER_EXECUTE_CHECKS. In some cases contact person is getting replicated to ECC successfully but in some it's not ! And in both the cases this error is getting passed to CRM service order.
Can anyone please help me on this exactly whatu2019s wrong with partner procedure and partner function customizing? Or do I need to add some code logic to stop this.
Kindly help ASAP.
Because every day we are getting thousands of CRM service orders which are affected by this Error.
Regards,
Amol.

Hi Dipesh,
Thank you very much.
I have verified both the things.Means partner procedure is same in both the system. Also contact person is replicated to ECC with same order.
As i mentioned this is happening with some service orders. Also there are some service orders where contact person is successfully replicated to ECC but there is error on CRM side:Partner function AP is not defined in partner procedure N () .
Kindly let me know what are the further checks i need to do.
Regards,
Amol.

Acrobat 10 plugin tab missing from Outlook 2010 32 bit

Acrobat 10 plugin tab missing from Outlook 2010 32 bit.
Un-installed/re-installed Acrobat 10.1.7.27
The PDF plug in is missing from Outlook COM add ins and Disabled add ins, confirmed that 7 .dll files were installed correctly in c:\program files (x86)\Adobe\Acrobat.com\Add-in
Also tried re-registering the DLL and adding PDFMOfficeAddinn.dll to Outlook add-ins.
Plug in tab is enabled and working in MS Word and Excel but not in Outlook 2010.

[discussion moved to Creating, Editing & Exporting PDFs forum]

Can't see the MS Outlook add-in side pane with Outlook 2013

We are on Outlook 2013 and I can't find a way of showing the side panel for the Cloud for Customer Outlook add-in. Everything seems to work fine with the add-in like exchanging emails, appointments, activities with the exception of the side pane which is not visible.
Does anybody know if there is any setting in Outlook to control it? Is Microsoft Outlook 2013 fully supported?
Thanks

Sorry Thierry if I wasn't clear enough.
I meant the Add-Ins tab in the Ribbon, not the Options:
SAP does provide the functionality to hide the pane, on the bottom right you can see the top of the pane and there is an X. It can close it but the add-in stays on.
Then in the Ribbon you can activate the "Add-Ins" tab and you will have the SAP Cloud for Customer menu command.
This is what I meant in my initial reply by saying that I do that often. I hide the pane and reactivate it by simply clicking on that button highlighter in black above.
At least in it's in Outlook 2010 but like you said in your initial post, maybe it is not available in 2013. Partho Guha will be able to confirm.
JB.

Icloud-Outlook-Add-in not loaded automatically

Dear Support Community,
I've been using my Iphones together with my Win PC / Outlook for several months.
No problems.
Since a few days, there's always the problem, that the "i-cloud-Outlook-Add-in" is not
loaded automatically, when I start Outlook.
Manual activiation (via Options -> Add-In --> Com Add-in --> tick in the box at "i-Cloud ...")
works perfect.
I've checked the registry entry "LoadBehaviour": 3 --> correct value, in my opinion.
Any ideas, how to get outlook to load the icloud add-in automatically at startup?
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards

I just had a user call in with this exact same problem. The steps that I took to resolve the issue are as follows:
1. Ran a repair on office installation and rebooted computer. (Not sure if this was nesary).
2. In Outlook go to File-Options-Add-Ins. Below for Manage COM Add-ins click the Go button.
3. find iCloud add-in and check it off to enable it. Click on OK until your back at outlook.
4. Close and relaunch outlook. Go back to File-Options-Add-Ins and down at the Manage change the dropdown to "Disabled Items".
5. Choose the iCloud.dll checkbox and click on enable.
6. Close outlook and reopen. You should now see the ribbon for iCloud sync.

Outlook add-in wrong password

My outlook icloud add-in is not functioning. It says "Wrong Password". I have disabled and re-enabled the add-in, I have signed out and in of iCloud from control panel, and have rebooted my machine. Have also downloaded latest version if iTunes. Anyone know what else I should try?

Yes, the Outlook add-in for 32 bit Outlook for 64 bit Windows 7 is in internal beta testing for release very soon. Hopefully by the time Adobe Connect 8.2 is released soon.

MIssing functionality outlook add-on: choosing a partner for an appointment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for