Missing scheme for service: "DistributedCacheForCommandPattern"

I'm getting this error after I put the many data using command pattern(Coherence Incubator ).
May I teach and have the following error correspondence measure?
Moreover, may not I teach why the following error occurs and may have?
Portable(com.tangosol.util.WrapperException): (Wrapped: Failed request execution for DistributedCacheForCommandPattern-A service on Member(Id=13, Timestamp=2011-05-09 16:08:12.646, Address=192.168.2.137:7203, MachineId=49468, Location=machine:wdbggp0c,process:aswdgA_dcpA_03_01,member:aswdgA_dcpA_03_01)) Missing scheme for service: "DistributedCacheForCommandPattern"
     at com.tangosol.util.Base.ensureRuntimeException(Base.java:293)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.tagException(Grid.CDB:36)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache.onInvokeRequest(DistributedCache.CDB:80)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$InvokeRequest.run(DistributedCache.CDB:1)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.DaemonPool$WrapperTask.run(DaemonPool.CDB:1)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.DaemonPool$WrapperTask.run(DaemonPool.CDB:32)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.DaemonPool$Daemon.onNotify(DaemonPool.CDB:63)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.CDB:42)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
     at <process boundary>
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.ThrowablePofSerializer.deserialize(ThrowablePofSerializer.java:57)
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.PofBufferReader.readAsObject(PofBufferReader.java:3293)
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.PofBufferReader.readObject(PofBufferReader.java:2600)
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.ConfigurablePofContext.deserialize(ConfigurablePofContext.java:348)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.Service.readObject(Service.CDB:4)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.Message.readObject(Message.CDB:1)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.message.DistributedCacheResponse.read(DistributedCacheResponse.CDB:2)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onNotify(Grid.CDB:123)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache.onNotify(DistributedCache.CDB:3)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.CDB:42)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Caused by:
Portable(java.lang.IllegalArgumentException): Missing scheme for service: "DistributedCacheForCommandPattern"
     at com.tangosol.net.DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory.findServiceScheme(DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory.java:735)
     at com.tangosol.net.DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory.ensureService(DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory.java:337)
     at com.tangosol.net.CacheFactory.getService(CacheFactory.java:692)
     at com.oracle.coherence.patterns.command.internal.CommandExecutor.acceptCommandExecutionRequest(CommandExecutor.java:730)
     at com.oracle.coherence.patterns.command.internal.SubmitCommandExecutionRequestProcessor.process(SubmitCommandExecutionRequestProcessor.java:112)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$Storage.invoke(DistributedCache.CDB:20)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache.onInvokeRequest(DistributedCache.CDB:50)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$InvokeRequest.run(DistributedCache.CDB:1)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.DaemonPool$WrapperTask.run(DaemonPool.CDB:1)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.DaemonPool$WrapperTask.run(DaemonPool.CDB:32)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.DaemonPool$Daemon.onNotify(DaemonPool.CDB:63)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.CDB:42)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
     at <process boundary>
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.ThrowablePofSerializer.deserialize(ThrowablePofSerializer.java:57)
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.PofBufferReader.readAsObject(PofBufferReader.java:3293)
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.PofBufferReader.readObject(PofBufferReader.java:2600)
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.PortableException.readExternal(PortableException.java:150)
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.ThrowablePofSerializer.deserialize(ThrowablePofSerializer.java:58)
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.PofBufferReader.readAsObject(PofBufferReader.java:3293)
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.PofBufferReader.readObject(PofBufferReader.java:2600)
     at com.tangosol.io.pof.ConfigurablePofContext.deserialize(ConfigurablePofContext.java:348)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.Service.readObject(Service.CDB:4)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.Message.readObject(Message.CDB:1)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.message.DistributedCacheResponse.read(DistributedCacheResponse.CDB:2)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onNotify(Grid.CDB:123)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache.onNotify(DistributedCache.CDB:3)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.CDB:42)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)

You have probably not included the coherence-commandpattern-cache-config.xml configuration file in you cluster configuration. Depending on which version of Coherence you have and which version of the Incubator you are using the way you include the file is different.
Using Coherence 3.7 and the latest Incubator release the top of your cache configuration file on the cluster need to look a bit like this
<cache-config
     xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/coherence/coherence-cache-config"
     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xmlns:element="class://com.oracle.coherence.environment.extensible.namespaces.XmlElementProcessingNamespaceContentHandler"
    element:introduce-cache-config="coherence-commandpattern-cache-config.xml">Read the Command Pattern documentation or look at the examples from the Incubator site for the version you are using.
JK

Similar Messages

The Condition for service price determination incomplete

Dear experts,
I run the System with EC&O Best Practice. Howerver, I can not enter Services on tab Service of Sales Order: Short text of Service, Quantity, UOM, Gross Price. the error "Condition for service price determination incomplete" occours when I press Enter key.
Conditions for service price determination incomplete
Message no. SE477
Diagnosis
Either the calculation schema for services does not exist or the condition types have not been defined correctly.
Procedure
Please check your Customizing settings for service conditions.
If you have not yet defined any conditions for services, you can adopt the standard SAP settings from client 0.
Please help me check this issue on the attached file.
Thank you very much.
Thanks,
Binh Tran
<Personal details shared by OP is removed by Moderator. >
Message was edited by: Jyoti Prakash

Hi All,
Thank you very much for your inputs.
I checked all the notes, 25357, 27024 and 1383066. Everything is ok in the system. and these notes explained more on the MM part not on the SD- BOS. However, still i am not able to complete the Inquiry, same error exists.
This error is in SD not in MM, while i am creating the inquiry BOS.
If any one come across it and solved it, please let me know.
Regards,
Suresh

Service PO is not picking the condition type defined for services

Hi Friends,
I am trying to create a PO for services.. but in conditions tab..the system is picking standard PO pricing procedure. It is not picking the service Pricing procedure MS0000. request your help in understanding the issue.
Also the PO is picking the Standard PO release strategy, but not the release startegy define for service..
thank you.
Kireeti

Hi Kireeti,
Your condition schemes for services probably have been modified. Please check
schemes MS0000 and MS0001 in your customizing. For a correct price
determination it is important that for example condition type PRS
is in the first position, further the settings for the flag
'Condition determined manually' should'nt be altered.
Actually the standard schema looks like:
4 0 PRS Total Price                       X 5
5 1 PRS0 General Price Compon             X
5 3 PRS1 Percentage of Wage               X
5 5 PRS2 Overheads                        X
5 7 PRS3 Misc Price Component             X
13 0 KR01 Header Discount                 X
14 0 KZ01 Header Surcharge                X
Could you please change your schema and retest?.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

The net price is calculated incorrectly for service items in contracts

The net price is calculated incorrectly for service items. Iu2019m creating a contract for services, transaction ME31K (without service master). At the services level Iu2019m adding u201CConditions Supplementsu201D:
-     PRS (gross price) =1000 EUR
-     Z999 (discount) = -100 EUR
-     ZPRS (cost) = 1500 EUR
The gross price is calculated correctly = 2400. My problem is with the net price, with this example the net price is just 1500 this means that is just considering the condition ZPRS.
Where can I customize the net price determination to considerer all price conditions?
Thanks in adavnced

Hi,
In the service industries area, SAP uses two calculation schemata,
MS0001 for contract/master services (Z999 must be added to MS0001) and otherwise, MS0000. Assignment
occurs according to the Customizing settings defined under
'Materials Management -> External Services Management -> Maintain
Conditions for Services -> Conditions: Schema for Services'. If you want
to use another calculation schema for contract/master services, you must
define this with an own entry under Maintain Conditions for Services ->
Variable Calculation Schema for Services', for example, in the form 'K
WK value contract MSxxxx service schema', if a corresponding schema
MSxxxx has been defined first.
If Z999 is a header discount for the service outline level, it must be added to MS0002.
Like the standard discount condition type ZA00 the Z999 must have Cond. class   A for Discount or surcharge in the condition type setting in the customizing, and no access sequence should be assigned to it.
Please read the notes 798798 and 353482.
Regards,
Edit

Conditions for service price determination incomplete

Hi All,
While doing the VA11 through SD-BOS, I am getting the following.
Conditions for service price determination incomplete
Message no. SE477
Diagnosis
Either the calculation schema for services does not exist or the condition types have not been defined correctly.
Procedure
Please check your Customizing settings for service conditions.
If you have not yet defined any conditions for services, you can adopt the standard SAP settings from client 0.
Please let me know did you anyone got the same kind of error.
Thanks,
Suresh.

Hi All,
Thank you very much for your inputs.
I checked all the notes, 25357, 27024 and 1383066. Everything is ok in the system. and these notes explained more on the MM part not on the SD- BOS. However, still i am not able to complete the Inquiry, same error exists.
This error is in SD not in MM, while i am creating the inquiry BOS.
If any one come across it and solved it, please let me know.
Regards,
Suresh

Pricing procedure for Service PO and Service Entry Sheet

Hi
Can the same pricing procedure be used for Service PO and Service Entry Sheet? What is the purpose of creating a seperate pricing procedure for service entry sheet?
Regards
Soumen

There is no separate pricing procedure for Service Entry Sheet. Whatever the schema is determined in Service PO, the price is calcuated during service entry sheet. However you can maintain separate calculation schema for service purchase orders.
This schema will be determined based on the schema group assigned in Vendor Master.

Account / Transaction key for Services

Dear Sappers,
I am maintaining a condition for services. IMG MM - External Services Management -> Maintain Condition for services . Here i have created condition type and maintained in conditions: Schemas for services. But i cannot create Account key / Transaction key here. Can anyone guide me where i can create account / transaction key for external service management.
Account / Transaction key can be maintained for normal PO conditions in IMG MM -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Price Determination but those account keys are not appearing in External Service Management calculation schema for services.
Thanks.
Shahzad Shakoor

Using OMGH the transaction key can be maintained but it doesnt appears in Service Management calculation schema.
Using SM30 V_T687 transaction key is maintained and it is accepted in Service Management caculation schem but now i have to assign GL accoutn to it.
Kindly guide me where i can assign GL account for this newly created transaction key as this one is not appearing in OBYC.
Thanks a lot.

Caculate price for service

Hi all,
Please help me deal with below problem,
I create PO for service and I want to caculate the price of this service by fomula: = AB110% , with: A, B are number.
Normally, I use condition to caculate price, but in this situation, it can't help me.
Please show me how to caculate the price using fomula.
Thanks so much

Hi Thinga,
oh sorry, you could create then your own condition formula for alternative calculation type in the customizing of conditions - SPRO - External Services Management - Maintain Conditions for Services - Conditions: Schema for Services, enter for your condition type your own condition formula. You can maintain your formulas in transaction VOFM (belongs to area SD).
Please read also the note 327220.
How to develop your routines and use VOFM, please read:
The topic belongs to SAP Community Network Forums » ABAP Development » ABAP, General .
Regards,
Edit

WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id

Hello
our central manager frequently reports for one WAE
WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id: 62.
WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id: 61.
But the WAE seems to run nornal and we can't find eny problem and event on the WAE (7341 device). By screening the CCO documentaion we also couldn't find any explanation for this error log.
We have an installation with app. 30 WAEs/WAVEs in with software release 4.2.3.
Could you please provide us some hints for troubleshooting.
Many thanks in advance!

Hello
I have the same issue and I noticed when we install a new location with two waves and wccp, it has for some reason an impact on exicting waves running in wccp mode:
the alarm ''WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id: 61 or 62'' riased on locations that were already in production.
new location : 192.168.X.21 is one of the new wave, 192.168.X.219 is the 2nd wave.A.B.C.D is the router loopback ip address
A.B.C.D
Existing waves (on different locations) already running in WCCP are : 192.168.Y.64.
Router (192.168.M.52) for another location where waves : 192.168.M.50 & 192.168.M.52 are already in service: Loopback ip is E.F.G.H
any idea why configuring wccp in one location has an impact on other locations
thnak you in advance
2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 12. Service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500012: New router notified. Rtr_Id A.B.C.D for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.219 for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.219 is seen by router A.B.C.E for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 12. Service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500012: New router notified. Rtr_Id A.B.C.D for service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.219 for service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.219 is seen by router A.B.C.E for service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 13. Service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.21 for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.21 is seen by router A.B.C.E for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 13. Service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.21 for service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.21 is seen by router A.B.C.E for service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:56:09 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 612011 Dec 14 08:56:09 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 622011 Dec 14 08:58:55 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-3-500078: Raising WCCP missing assignment alarm: WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id: 61.2011 Dec 14 08:58:55 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-3-500078: Raising WCCP missing assignment alarm: WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id: 62.2011 Dec 14 08:59:03 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 14. Service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:59:03 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 14. Service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:59:19 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 612011 Dec 14 08:59:19 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 622011 Dec 14 08:59:31 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500028: Removing web cache 192.168.X.21 due to timeout for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:59:31 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500028: Removing web cache 192.168.X.21 due to timeout for service 62.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 15. Service 61.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.21 for service 61.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.21 is seen by router E.F.G.H for service 61.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 15. Service 62.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.21 for service 62.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.21 is seen by router E.F.G.H for service 62.2011 Dec 14 09:02:09 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 612011 Dec 14 09:02:09 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 62

Manual Billing is missing for service period 06/19/2009 u2013 7/21/2009

HI
Can anybody help me to fix the below issue?
Issue: The Manual Billing is missing for service period 06/19/2009 u2013 7/21/2009 for contract 9018967003.
After completing the Billing and invoicing using EASIBI t-code and looking at the refreshed ES32, i found that Manula billing is missing for service period 06/19/2009 to 07/21/2009.
thx
DGR

Hi,
It seems you have processed normal billing and invoicing process.
If the individual invoicing process is successful, the invoicing document should get created and posted unless outsorted.
In your case, if the invoicing document is outsorted, you would be able to see the billing document. (in refreshed ES32 view as mentioned) .
For the billing document, you can check the invoicing document as well, when you display the billing document ... check the print document tab on the same.
If the invoicing document is visible and is not posted, it would be out sorted. Either check the EMMA tcode processing for the same as it seems, an EMMA case might have generated as you are unable to view the same in EA05.
Hope this helps!!
Regards,
Rajesh Popat

Setting about a database and a schema for Hyperion Shared Services

I need to setup a Database and a schema for a install of Hyperion 11.1.2.1
please advise

Doesn't the app install its own schemas?
Not sure how this relates to XE. Please use one of the releveant Hyperion product forums:
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=16

How to extend AD schema for Exchange

Hi,
Please can someone help me understand the process for extending AD schema for Exchange?
I’m concerned because there are some cautions noted generally in the process so i’m looking for best practice to ensure extending in a safe and smooth manor.
Bit of background on our environment -
Moving to Office365 in a hybrid environment, never used Microsoft products for email.
New On-prem AD Physical DC, 2012 Server with DirSync to Azure/ O365
OU’s populated with objects.
Would like to manage users and distribution groups from within AD on-prem.
Many thanks,
Leo.

It is recommended to have at least two DC/GC servers for HA.
We are using Office 365 too for 65k + and we do have Powershell scripts to make the attribute changes and identify users with missing or incorrect messaging attributes. So, you might think about using Powershell scripts too.
65K? That's the largest I've heard yet! Are you in an educational environment? That's what I understand and should have pointed out. We are a university and the first to use O365 consolidating Google, Notes and Mirapoint active mailboxes. We still
haven't touched Alumni, which are on Google. That would take us to the 75k level, but that discussion is on a backburner.
Ace Fekay
MVP, MCT, MCSE 2012, MCITP EA & MCTS Windows 2008/R2, Exchange 2013, 2010 EA & 2007, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Complete List of Technical Blogs: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/technicalblogs.php
This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

Purchasing - A/P Transaction Processing for Services and Non Inventory Item

On of the main areas of concern that businesses have is in the area of Purchasing, Goods Receipts and AP Invoices Processing - There is a requirement that businesses have widely referred to as 3-way matching.
While SAP Business One has this functionality covered quiet well via the following, there is still some need for enhancements so that the application can correctly reflect the AP Accruals:
- Purchase Order processing with Approval Process (if configured)
- Ability to perform Goods Receipts for Services.
- Matching of AP Invoices to Goods Receipts with AP Invoice Approval Process (if configured)
The above transactions serve the 3-way matching quiet well for all purchases however when it comes to accuring for Services that have been provided, the application does not do this. The Goods Receipt transaction processing to acknowledge the service delivery is allowed however the related posting to the allocation account is missing.
The process that is followed by the application is same for Items that have not Inventory Items in Item Master.
As a result of the above, the business have to manually work out what the Accurals for services provided but not invoiced should be.
With little enhancement to the product this shortfall could very easily be overcome.

Hi,
Once there are transactions, we cannot make existing Inventory type item to Non Inventory type item.
Check SAP note:937297 which states as follows :
Symptom
Changing the status of the Inventory Item checkbox (in Item Master Data) for items with inventory transactions and documents, might lead to inaccuracies in the calculations of inventory value.
Other terms
Inventory Item, Non-inventory Item, Item Master Data, Continuous Stock, Perpetual Inventory, Inventory Valuation, 2004, 2005, 2005 A SP01
Reason and Prerequisites
Consulting Note
Solution
The status of an item (Inventory Item/Non-Inventory item as selected in the Inventory Item checkbox in the Item Master Data window), cannot be changed once an A/P, A/R, or Inventory document is posted for the item.
Regards,
Jitin Chawla

How do I set-up my Dataset to pull data for Service Requests for a report

I am using SQL Server 2012 Report Builder 3.0.
I have my Data Source added - DWDataMart
I want to build my Dataset to query and find a very specific item. Basically I am creating a daily report that will show what each "team" or Support Group (AD Object) Closed that day. He also wants the ability to open it by date, so if he misses
a day he can get it later.
I am totally new to this report building and only got this far by following a guide on a blog, but he used incident Reports in his example, and I do not know what objects to query for service requests.
Thanks for any information you can provide.

First, you will need to get the support group ID's in the warehouse before you can run reports for them. I found that putting these queries in their own stored procedure was a better path.
select IR.IncidentTierQueuesId, IR.IncidentTierQueuesValue
from dbo.IncidentTierQueues as IR
where IR.IncidentTierQueuesId != 0
select SR.ServiceRequestSupportGroupId, SR.ServiceRequestSupportGroupValue
from dbo.ServiceRequestSupportGroup as SR
where sr.ServiceRequestSupportGroupId != 0
Enter the the support group ID's into your work item query.
Incident information is in dbo.IncidentDim and Service Requests are found in dbo.ServiceRequestDim. Both incidents and service requests link to relationship data through dbo.WorkItemDim. You can INNER JOIN on BaseManagedEntityId to link the incident
or service request to the workitem entry and from there to the Assigned Users, Affected Users, or Affected Configuration Items. Each relationship has it's own separate fact views.
If you poke about in the tables, you will find it pretty easy to pull back all sorts of information from the data warehouse.

SSO is not working - User is missing credentials for connecting to alias

Dear Experts,
I am facing a strange problem in SSO with reference system user mapping. I have configured reference system user mapping for accessing R/3 for ESS/MSS and transactional iviews along with UWL. The SSO was configured 2 months ago and was working fine till yesterday.
Since this Monday, (2 days), the system connection tests are failing on connector. But, ESS/MSS & Transaction iviews with SAP Logon tickets are working fine. But, while trying to access UWL tasks, SSO is failing. Following is the error message -
"Exception occured Exception type:com.sap.netweaver.bc.uwl.connect.ConnectorException Message:Tue Aug 11 09:46:58 CEST 2009
(Connector) :com.sap.portal.connectivity.destinations.PortalDestinationsServiceException:User is missing credentials for connecting to alias <Aliassystem>. Contact your system administrator. "
I have created a destination for the respective backend in Visual Admin > node > services > Destinations as some tasks are not visible in UWL as per Note- 1133821, 2 weeks ago.It was working fine till yestreday. While testing from destinations, for Connected User(SAP Logon ticket Assertion ticket) , getting the error message -
Error During ping operation:Ticket contain no/an emplty ABAP user id(refer note 1159962). The destination is successfully connected with configured user.
But from the Tracecollector logs, I can see that the mapped user is set in the SAP Logon ticket and the User <ABCD> is existing in the target ECC system. More over, the SSO with refence system user mapping is working fine for ESS/MSS and Transaction based iviews. It is failing only for UWL tasks and also in system connection tests for connector. ITS was failing since the beginning.WAS is successful even now.
Trace file info -
Mapped user [ABCD] set in SAP Logon Ticket. The authenticated user is [<portaluserid>]. Authentication stack: [ticket]..
The created ticket is:
[Ticket [initialized]
Ticket Version = 0
Ticket Codepage = (Encoding=1100)
User = <ABCD>
Issuing System ID    = EPD
Issuing System Client = 000
Creation Time = 200908110746
Valid Time    = 8 h 0 min
Signature (length=261 bytes)
I checked tcode SSO2 in ECC system and it is ready for accepting the logon tickets. The strange thing is single sign on is working for ESS/Transactional iviews and not for UWL. Second thing is UWL was working fine till yesterday morning and stopped working now with SSO problems.
Can you pls advise where to look for fixing the SSO - missing user details for UWL destination?
regards,
Isvarya

<title>reporting the text as formatted text - Dear Experts,</title>

</style>
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
     {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
     mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
     mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
     mso-style-noshow:yes;
     mso-style-parent:"";
     mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
     mso-para-margin:0cm;
     mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
     mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
     font-size:10.0pt;
     font-family:"Times New Roman";
     mso-ansi-language:#0400;
     mso-fareast-language:#0400;
     mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]><![if gte mso 9]><![endif]><![if gte mso 9]>Mapped user set in SAP Logon Ticket. The
authenticated user is . Authentication stack: ..
The created ticket is:
[Ticket

Missing scheme for service: "DistributedCacheForCommandPattern"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for