Move User Specific Configuration to New PC

Hello All,
I am preparing a new PC for a user that has changed a lot of the default settings in Word and Excel (i.e. fonts, sizes, templates, etc.) I would like to know how to move this specific information over from the old pc? Is it all stored in the registry
or a configuration file. The only thing I can find is for 2003 there was a save settings wizard, we are using 2010 and she has 2010 on her old pc as well.
Any information is greatly appreciated.
Thanks!

I dont think you can move the settings as most of them are stored in registry keys and in binary format.
Arnav Sharma | http://arnavsharma.net/ Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading
the thread.

Similar Messages

User-Specific Configuration for different named search role

We need different user specific layout settings for each user. i have duplicated catalog user role for each user and maintained specific named search for that particular user in constraint. but when we want to configure specific layout for individual user. its not showing that catalog user in the catalog config UI for the layout configuration. please advice. if it shows that specific user then we would configure each specific user layout with individual look and feel ( like shopping lists, search fields, images, etc., ). thanks for your inputs.

Answered

Outlook error when collapsing groups on TS - specific users only - cleanviews and new profile didn't help.

We have a Citrix environment for app publishing.
Office 2007 is installed, and the users use the published outlook 2007.
For some users only(not all users), when they arrange by "from" and in-groups they get an error when they try and collapse groups.
Error is "There are no items to show in this view".
It does not affect all users.
Troubleshooting attempted:
Recreated user's profile. - No change
Made user an administrator
-Logged in locally
-ran outlook in safe-mode -> no change.
-ran cleanviews -> no change
There were no policies applied at the time, and there are no user specific configurations.
I can't find any other articles which might be pertinent. How should I troubleshoot this?

Hi,
One more thing you can try is to run Office Configuration Analyzer Tool to find if there is any error of the installation.
The tool provides a detailed report of your installed Office programs. This report includes many parameters about your Office program configuration. It also highlights known problems that are found when OffCAT scans your computer.
Office Configuration Analyzer Tool (OffCAT) information:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2812744
To download Microsoft Office Configuration Analyzer Tool:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-hk/download/details.aspx?id=36852
Regards,
Melon Chen
Forum Support
Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here

GW2012 move: Does it make sense to move users to a new PO?

Moving from GW8 on OES-NW to GW2012 on OES11: Does it make sense to create new post office and move users?
We have a medium size GroupWise 8 system with a single post office holding less than 600 user accounts, 128 resources and 77 distribution lists.
Due to politics we also have a non-GroupWise external domain that contains a non-GroupWise external post office with a large number of "users".
The post office is on the primary domain.
3 secondary domains hold a GWIA and two web access agents.
I've never been real clear where the external stuff exists...
One of the web access gateways resides on an OES11 server.
The other webaccess agent and the GWIA are on OES-NW servers.
All reside in NSS volumes.
Given the lack support for NSS volumes on Linux servers by most backup applications (including mine), I've pretty much determined that it makes sense to move my GW system to EXT3 volumes.
Even if I change backup software and stick with NSS, and even though all my data is stored on SAN arrays, from what I've read on the forums and from Danita's books, it's preferable to copy your GW system files to a new NSS volume, as opposed to just re-attaching the OES-NW LUN to the new OES11 server.
Point being, whatever I do will involve copying the entire system via dbcopy and at some point, will also involve shutting down the existing domain and PO for the last phase of the copying process.
So..., I'm contemplating the following scenario:
Create a new OES11 server with EXT3 volumes sufficient for holding my GroupWise system.
Create new GroupWise 8 domain on the server.
Promote the new domain to primary and upgrade this new domain to GroupWise 2012.
Once the new domain is upgraded, create new GW2012 post office on new server/primary domain and migrate the users, resources and distribution lists to the new post office.
In the past I've had an additional post office and had migrated a about 20-25 users to that post office.
It wasn't a terrible process, and fortunately, I didn't run into any problems with the migration of those users.
When I re-consolidated my system, moving them back was also problem free
On the pro side:
No downtime of entire system
Relatively simple
Any issues in the migration process would be user-specific and would not effect the entire system.
On the con side:
Process could take far longer, since you can't move a lot of users simultaneously.
In addition, we have a small group of users with anywhere from 40,000 to 80,000 email in their account, so I'd have to factor that into haw many users I migrate at one time.
The chance of running into a stalled migration, for whatever reason, is probably much higher than running into a problem with moving the domain and PO via dbcopy.
The unknown factors for me and my level of experience:
It's been a while since I've had multiple post offices, so I don't recall what changes the users might see with regard to distribution lists, web access or external email.

Originally Posted by gathagan
Moving from GW8 on OES-NW to GW2012 on OES11: Does it make sense to create new post office and move users?
Is there any reason you think that warrants to do so?
If the system is performing normally I'd opt to stick to upgrading the current setup as is.
I'm also curious, are you intending to upgrade to 2014 after the 2012 upgrade?
Originally Posted by gathagan
The post office is on the primary domain.
3 secondary domains hold a GWIA and two web access agents.
I've never been real clear where the external stuff exists...
Ok, that setup makes the upgrade easier. As you will start the upgrade with the primary holding the PO's... the PO's can be upgraded right after or during the domain upgrade (depending on if the MTA and POA are running on the same server).
That means you don't have to think about upgraded webaccess/GWIA connectivity issues with a lower PO version.
The external stuff are simply configurations found in the existing GroupWise domain databases. Or do you mean where those connected systems actually run?
Originally Posted by gathagan
One of the web access gateways resides on an OES11 server.
The other webaccess agent and the GWIA are on OES-NW servers.
All reside in NSS volumes.
And the primary Domain and PO are also still on NetWare (version 6.5 SP8 I presume), correct?
Originally Posted by gathagan
Given the lack support for NSS volumes on Linux servers by most backup applications (including mine), I've pretty much determined that it makes sense to move my GW system to EXT3 volumes.
Which backup application is that? With GroupWise op Linux not much NSS support is needed IMO.... as long as the files get backed up properly other metadata (rights, ownerships, etc) is irrelevant.
As for EXT3 vs NSS, when dealing with OES I always choose NSS. But that's me.
Another option could be to use XFS instead of ext3. That does perform much better, but has to be noted that it is more prone to file corruption in unexpected power loss situations.
With ext3, watch out for the scheduled filesystem check cycles at boot, that is one thing I really dislike about ext3 as disabling that check completely is not recommended and it means at least once a year the system will take an extensive amount of time to complete a (re)boot due to the check running on the ext3 filesystem. That usually pops up on you when you are not counting on it and "just quickly" want to reboot the server in a patching routine or other.
Originally Posted by gathagan
Even if I change backup software and stick with NSS, and even though all my data is stored on SAN arrays, from what I've read on the forums and from Danita's books, it's preferable to copy your GW system files to a new NSS volume, as opposed to just re-attaching the OES-NW LUN to the new OES11 server.
Yes, it's always good if you can start with a clean volume when transitioning from NetWare to OES.
Depending on how long you can afford to have the system down during upgrade, you can also choose the route of moving the NetWare LUN to the new OES server. Adding a second new LUN to the OES server with the needed size and initializing it with a new NSS volume and then just simply do a volume to volume copy using the cp of rsync command. As it's on the same server that can go quite quickly within an acceptable maintenance window to complete all move/upgrade steps.
Originally Posted by gathagan
Point being, whatever I do will involve copying the entire system via dbcopy and at some point, will also involve shutting down the existing domain and PO for the last phase of the copying process.
Sure, though you don't necessarily have to use dbcopy... depending on what you are planning to do. An offline copy won't require it for example.
How much data are we talking about (in GB's)?
Originally Posted by gathagan
So..., I'm contemplating the following scenario:
Create a new OES11 server with EXT3 volumes sufficient for holding my GroupWise system.
Create new GroupWise 8 domain on the server.
Promote the new domain to primary and upgrade this new domain to GroupWise 2012.
Once the new domain is upgraded, create new GW2012 post office on new server/primary domain and migrate the users, resources and distribution lists to the new post office.
If you really want to move users.... sure. I'd again opt for upgrading the existing system.
Also, it's a good rule to have the PO's running the same GroupWise version and patchlevel before commencing user moves. Moves between PO's with a different GroupWise version can lead to issues.
Originally Posted by gathagan
In the past I've had an additional post office and had migrated a about 20-25 users to that post office.
It wasn't a terrible process, and fortunately, I didn't run into any problems with the migration of those users.
When I re-consolidated my system, moving them back was also problem free
If you would want to move users, for whatever reason, I'd opt to first upgrade to the latest version first, then move. There have been many enhancements and bugfixes made in the move procedure over these last couple of years.
Originally Posted by gathagan
On the pro side:
No downtime of entire system
Relatively simple
Any issues in the migration process would be user-specific and would not effect the entire system.
On the con side:
Process could take far longer, since you can't move a lot of users simultaneously.
In addition, we have a small group of users with anywhere from 40,000 to 80,000 email in their account, so I'd have to factor that into haw many users I migrate at one time.
The chance of running into a stalled migration, for whatever reason, is probably much higher than running into a problem with moving the domain and PO via dbcopy.
I prefer a system upgrade over moving users. The process of moving when dealing with 100+ users, requires more effort and there are always things that need attention for a portion of the users. Also things like mobile devices can require some extra attention after having moved an account for example.
True, problems during a system upgrade can potentially affect all users. That is a factor. From the many upgrades I've done that's rarely really been an issue and problems encountered during an upgrade did not cause too much delay. Just make sure you always have a good full backup handy so you can reverse the upgrade if ever needed.
Originally Posted by gathagan
The unknown factors for me and my level of experience:
It's been a while since I've had multiple post offices, so I don't recall what changes the users might see with regard to distribution lists, web access or external email.
If by this you are referring to user moves and address book visibility between PO's, that should not be different to what users are seeing now. At least, the default is that within a GroupWise system all is visible throughout the system. If you have specifically set GroupWise objects to Postoffice visibility... then that would be something to check.
Cheers,
Willem

User Specific catalog UI configuration - Custom catalog user role

Hi all,
We need different user specific layout settings for each user. i have duplicated catalog user role for each user and maintained specific named search for that particular user in constraint. but when we want to configure specific layout for individual user. its not showing that catalog user in the catalog config UI for the layout configuration. please advice. if it shows that specific user then we would configure each specific user layout with individual look and feel ( like shopping lists, search fields, images, etc., ). thanks for your inputs.
Your help would be highly appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi Smartsoft General user,
I guess you are on SRM-MDM Catalog 3.0
We have the same business scenario as yours. Its working perfectly for us.
1. Donot copy Catalog User role. SRM-MDM UI Config only accepts users assigned under std Catalog User role. You dont need mutiple copies of Catalog user role, anyways it wont work.
2. Create multiple webservices for each Named search. Provide one User (like User1, User2...or your own created ones) and one Named Search as following parameters in each webservice.
          http://<your server:port>/SRM-MDM/SRM_MDM
username     User<n>
password     <password>
server     <your server>
repositoryType     M ( for Master ) S (for Slave) - Make sure you are pointing to right repo if you have master/slave
catalog     <provide Repository name- make sure you are giving right repository name, I provided it wrong first time>
port     <your port>
uilanguage     SY-LANGU
datalanguage     SY-LANGU
mask     < keep blank if you want dynamic search>
namedsearch     <Provide exact Named search name as you provided in Data Manager>
HOOK_URL
returntarget     _parent
If you are creating 5 different Named searches, create 5 different webservice definitions as above.
3. Now for each Catalog user, you can perform separate search UI layout as you wish.
Let me know if this helps or have any questions. If this worked for me, we will make it work for you.
~Pravin

Move Users from OCS 2007 R2 to New Lync 2013

I am trying to move users from OCS to Lync 2013 from within the Lync 2013 Control Panel and am getting an error that states "Cannot find Registrar pool. Verify that "FQDN of old pool" is a valid registrar pool.

Give this Lync powershell command a go:
Move-CsLegacyUser <user> -Target <Lync2013 Pool Name>
Move-CsLegacyUser -Identity "Pilar Ackerman" -Target "atl-cs-001.litwareinc.com"
Have you reviewed the OCS to 2013 migration documents?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj205375.aspx
Did you add the OCS pool to the 2013 topology?
Have you visited Lync News lately? All of the latest Lync news, articles, and tips collected in one giant aggregator. http://lyncne.ws

How to move Closed Notification to a new user?

How to move Closed Notification to a new user? Anybody help! Thanks!

Hi,
The ideal scenario is that you don't notify a user - you notify a role instead. Roles don't get sick, get made redundant, retire, leave etc. etc. - however, it's easier said than done.
Although it's probably not supported, I can see no harm in doing a direct table update on WF_NOTIFICATIONS to modify the recipient role. However, I would question the logic of keeping old notifications in the system - if you run the standard purge routines (and you should be!), then that will clear out the old notifications automatically.
Additionally, I would be wary of reassigning old notifications - it would blow the audit trail completely if you move a closed notification between users (which is why there is no API for it). If Bill approved a purchase order for £1 million, and then left, I would expect (and need!) the history to shown exactly who did it, rather than a completely different user.
I'd be astounded if Oracle does anything with any enhancement requests for Workflow any more, even if they were for things that made sense.
HTH,
Matt
WorkflowFAQ.com - the ONLY independent resource for Oracle Workflow development
Alpha review chapters from my book "Developing With Oracle Workflow" are available via my website http://www.workflowfaq.com
Have you read the blog at http://www.workflowfaq.com/blog ?
WorkflowFAQ support forum: http://forum.workflowfaq.com

SEM BPS locking even after user switches to a new variable value

Hi,
This is locking related question & appreciate any kind of suggestion.
Users are locking previously planned variable value even after changing to a new value which is causing another user with a locking issue.
I've a variable GROUP defined at planning level & included in the planning folder.
let's say USER1 is planning for GROUP1 & saved the data after planning.
same user has changed the variable to GROUP2 & is planning now without leaving UPSPL session.
at this point, when USER2 tries to plan for GROUP1 & is faced with a message "USER1 is currently processing the data".
currently, USER1 is planning for GROUP2 right? so, why it's still giving locking message (locking GROUP1).
I even followed SAP note 635244 & created a DB table & included GROUP characteristic in to the table but of not much help.
even after this, I still see that USER1 is locking both GROUP1 & GROUP2 in report UPC_ENQUEUE_READ.
Appreciate if any one can share your ideas to deal this kind of issue.

Hi Hari,
You indicated in your 1st post, that User 1 is able to access both Group 1 and Group 2. I am assuming in your configuration, multiple users share the same values in the Group variable and they are making selections on execution of your planning application.
If this is the case, User 1 switching to Group 2 using, e.g., a drop-down menu does not remove the lock on Group 1. Hence User 2 will get the lock message.
You defining a table in DDIC only specifies Group as a lock relevant characteristic. It will not prevent locking in this fashion.
The probable options could be:
1. Consider dividing Groups amongst users, and use user-specific values for your variable;
2. Consider additional characteristic that will separate data sets.
The central question I would ask about this planning process, is why would different users be editing the same group at the same time? Is there a way to differentiate their planning needs? That might help in your modeling.
Hope this helps.
William Lee

In setting up my ICal calendar I have specific times (as new events) that I want to be included in the print out. This doesn't happen.

In setting up my ICAL calendar I have specific times (as new events) for each day. When it prints out the time does not show up (rather its a bar). I would like the time for each appointment to print out. How do I do this?

These are two possible approaches that will normally work to move an existing library to a new computer.
Method 1
Backup the library with this User Tip.
Deauthorize the old computer if you no longer want to access protected content on it.
Restore the backup to your new computer using the same tool used to back it up.
Keep your backup up-to-date in future.
Method 2
Connect the two computers to the same network. Share your <User's Music> folder from the old computer and copy the entire iTunes library folder into the <User's Music> folder on the new one. Again, deauthorize the old computer if no longer required.
Both methods should give the new computer a working clone of the library that was on the old one. As far as iTunes is concerned this is still the "home" library for your devices so you shouldn't have any issues with iTunes wanting to erase and reload.
I'd recommend method 1 since it establishes an ongoing backup for your library.
Note if you have failed to move contacts and calendar items across you should create one dummy entry of each in your new profile and iTunes should merge the existing data from the device.
If your media folder has been split out from the main iTunes folder you may need to do some preparatory work to make it easier to move. See make a split library portable.
Should you be in the unfortunate position where you are no longer able to access your original library or a backup then then see Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device for advice on how to set up your devices with a new library with the maximum preservation of data.
tt2

Please help me configure a new 8core for FCP

PLEASE HELP A PC GUY MOVE OVER...
I need to configure a new 8-core for FCP mainly. I need to keep the expense reasonable so dont want to spend extra $$$ if i dont have to.
I edit files from many different camera's these days. Mostly weddings & demos.
I want to go with an 8 core either Two 2.26GHz, OR 2.66GHz? Is the 2.2 fast enough with FCP?
How much ram do i need?
Do I need to stripe 2 sata drives together for the video?
Which video card?
Can you recommend any other software/hardware that will help me?
Here is a link to apples spec page:
http://www.apple.com/macpro/specs.html
THANKS

sarecco wrote:
PLEASE HELP A PC GUY MOVE OVER...
Welcome to the family. if you are not familiar with the Macintosh operating system, get yourself a book.
sarecco wrote:
I want to go with an 8 core either Two 2.26GHz, OR 2.66GHz? Is the 2.2 fast enough with FCP?
Either will work fine.
sarecco wrote:
How much ram do i need?
As much as you want but 8G will be adequate. More might not help significantly.
sarecco wrote:
Do I need to stripe 2 sata drives together for the video?
Depends on the video you're trying to use or if you want to do 9 camera multiclips. Maybe.
sarecco wrote:
Which video card?
The stock 4870 is the gold standard for Motion; the current rev of FCP does not care much about the GPU but we are hoping future revs will use the card directly.
sarecco wrote:
Can you recommend any other software/hardware that will help me?
Umm, withotu knowing what you need to do, of course not.
sarecco wrote:
THANKS
No sweat, ignore those other guys. We see this post about once a week around here so you can easily research it on the forum. Strongly urge you to locate your local Macintosh user group.
bogiesan

OIDH - User specific print control

Hi Experts,
In OIDH, we used to maintain user specific print control for the combination of Planning Plant & Planner Group.
There following same entry was maintained in 2 different ECC instances(Testing & Quality)
User - No entry(blank)
Planning Plant - *
Planner group - *
Shop paper - No entry(blank)
Output device - LOCL
New Spool Request - enabled
Print Immediately - enabled
Delete after output - enabled
In Testing environment, For a released work order, when i select Order-> Print -> Order, a pop up appears showing the entries of Shop papers.
In Quality environment, For a released work order, when i select Order-> Print -> Order, a pop up appears mentioning "No user-specific shop papers are defined".
Could you Pls let me know what could be the reason for the same User specific setting, Testing & Quality instances are behaving in a different way.
I hope the Quality system displays the right output message for the above Config setting.
Regards,
Karthik Bhaskaran

Please make changes in the following fields
User - No entry(blank) Instead of blank " * "
Shop paper - No entry(blank) Instead of blank " * "
Create the transport and move it to Quality and test it.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
S.N

Problem in user-specific search results

Hi All,
I have created an index which is indexing the docs properly. Now, I written a code to show user-specific docs using index management API's..
I have used an EP5 current user.
ISearchResultList results = session.getSearchResults(1,session.getNumberResultKeys());
In the following stmt, I am getting the proper value for session.getNumberResultKeys(), but still ISearchResultList size always is zero.
Is there anything I am missin in code or its a configuration problem??
I have full control permissions to index as well as to repository folder..Can someone plz get me out of this problem..Its urgent
Thanks & Regards,
Udit

Hi Udit,
I got the solution for the problem. Here is the code I am using and its working great. Just give a try
com.sapportals.portal.security.usermanagement.IUser user = null;
user = (com.sapportals.portal.security.usermanagement.IUser)request.getUser().getUser();
response.write("<html><head><title>Search</title></head><body>");
ResourceContext c = new ResourceContext(user);
try {
IIndexService indexService =
          (IIndexService) ResourceFactory
     .getInstance()
     .getServiceFactory()
     .getService(IServiceTypesConst.INDEX_SERVICE);
     SearchQueryListBuilder sqb = new SearchQueryListBuilder();
     sqb.setSearchTerm("valero");
     IQueryEntryList qel = sqb.buildSearchQueryList();
     // get an instance of federated search
IFederatedSearch federatedSearch =
          (IFederatedSearch) indexService.getObjectInstance(
          IWcmIndexConst.FEDERATED_SEARCH_INSTANCE);
     List indexList = new ArrayList();
     String index = null;
     if (index != null && index.length() > 0) {
     // take a specified index from index= parameter
     indexList.add(indexService.getIndex(index));
     } else {
     // take all available indexes
     indexList = indexService.getActiveIndexes();
     // it is recommended to use a search session object
     // for searching execution
     ISearchSession session = null;
     if (session == null)
     session = federatedSearch.searchWithSession(qel, indexList, c);
     this.renderResultHeader(response, session, indexList);
     // get all results from the search session
     ISearchResultList results =     session.getSearchResults(1, session.getTotalNumberResultKeys());
     response.write(" from session => " + results.size() + " and size is : " + results.toString());
Here it will print the size of the ISearchResultList, the problem is the user we are passing to ResourceContext is not proper.

BPS User-Specific Variables by Web

Hi,
I'm triyng to setup a CC planning interface for my company.
I configured the levels and layouts and they work fine.
I run the interface with the planning folders and everything works fine but when I setup the Web Interface tha layout stops working. The message is something like "Variable XXXX can't be specified".
I'm using user specific variables in the planning level so every user can only see and modificate certain CCs.
Any ideas?
Thank you very much.

Alejandro,
Sorry, I had been at a new client this week doing a review and it is long hours so have not checked back.
The other discussions groups I participate on is e-mail based so only checking here when I have a block of time.
What type of cost center variable are you using? on 0costcenter or on the hierarhcy? Are you using variable with user specific value or with of type authorization or something else?
did you configure the web interface using web enabled layout or using Web interface buillder?
Mary

How to move users between OU's from an exported list

Hey Guys
New to Powershell
We are going to move large number of users from one OU to another.. For that I am using
get-aduser -filter * -searchbase "OU=ou1,DC=domain" | move-adobject -targetpath "OU=ou2,DC=domain"
As a backout plan we want to reverse that.. so what I am thinking is to right click on the OU1 and export list as txt. So we have all users in a tab/csv format with username.. How can I then write a one liner / script to search for all the users in the list
in AD (or in specific OU2 in AD) and then move them to another OU (or OU1 as above example)?
Or if there is a better quicker method please let me know.
Cheers

Hi,
Here's something to start with:
$targetOU = 'OU=Test 2,DC=domain,DC=com'
Get-ADUser -Filter * -SearchBase 'OU=Test 1,DC=domain,DC=com' | ForEach {
$props = @{
Name = $_.Name
Username = $_.SamAccountName
OriginalOU = ($_.DistinguishedName -split ',OU=' -split ',')[1]
NewOU = ''
Status = ''
try {
Move-ADObject -Identity $_.DistinguishedName -TargetPath $targetOU -ErrorAction Stop
$props.NewOU = ($targetOU -split ',' -replace 'OU=','')[0]
$props.Status = 'Success'
} catch {
$props.Status = 'FAILED'
New-Object PsObject -Property $props
} | Sort Name | Select Name,Username,OriginalOU,NewOU,Status | Export-Csv .\userMoveDetails.csv -NoTypeInformation
Don't retire TechNet! -
(Don't give up yet - 12,950+ strong and growing)
Sorry new to coding.. but this looks awefully complicated for my situation.. Won't the code which I have said simple move users from one container to another existing one? Just need to know how to do the reverse if needed .. OU2 will already have users..
so need to differentiate and was thinking the right click on OU1 and export list.
Thanks

I bought a license for Lr a few years back and installed it on a mac laptop. I want to move that license to my new iMac and remove it from my old laptop. How? Thanks!!!

I bought a license for Lr a few years back and installed it on a mac laptop. I want to move that license to my new iMac and remove it from my old laptop. How?
I downloaded Lr on the new iMac but there does not seem to be a way of "registering" the software to give it functionality.
Thanks!!!

Your Lightroom License key is,
1. Cross platform Mac and or Win.
2. It is a single user / owner.
3. You can have two installations active with one in use at any point in time.
4. There is no deactivate process like other Photoshop products.
5. You can uninstall / install as many times as you need as long as you keep the spirit of the license.
6. The license key is specific to the Lightroom version, i.e License key for LR 4 will not work for LR 5.
7. You can upgrade i.e. purchase from any version of Lightroom 1,2,3,4 to the latest LR 5.

Move User Specific Configuration to New PC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for