Moving threads, Pros vs Cons

Pros
It may be more convenient to the user (IF they can figure out they have a PM, and IF they can relocate the thread)
Cons
Jive thread movement BUGS and caching "issues"
Jive incorrectly implements thread moving: good forum software leaves a link in place of the former thread that redirects to the correct forum. This ensures that the user can find their original post, and also makes it clear and obvious to the user that they are switching forums (instead of being magically switched to another forum without even noticing).  Even better, it could be done so only the OP can see that shortcut link, if done correctly.  i.e. The Jive design team is being lead with the IT equivalent of Forrest Gump.
User confusion (not just of the OP, but of those who were attempting to assist them in the original forum)
It is more impolite and condescending to forcibly move their post, than simply directing them to the correct forum and asking them to copy and paste their post--OR asking them if they'd like the thread moved, before it is moved
In the off chance that a user finds someone who CAN help them in the wrong forum, it prevents them from continuing their interaction with that user
They aren't going to learn how to navigate to the correct forum if they're always moved to it
It wastes more time for moderators and will burn them out (theoretically), who should be doing worried about other issues, and should have a life
A simple and polite "here is the correct forum to ask your question" can be done by ANY helpful and knowledgeable user, not just mods
It obscures the fact that there is a website navigation learning curve problem for new users, by making it impossible to count the number of off topic posts placed here
Mods may not even know which forum to move a thread to, or could make a mistake and move it to the wrong forum
Notifying the user in this Jiveware is problematic because PMs are not very noticable even to forum "veterans", rendering that method of notifying users worthless
How many more @#$% reasons do we need to provide?
Obey the forum thought police.  Violators will be locked, deleted and banned.

My suggestion (copied from my original thread on Moving Threads):
Rick,
for my part, it's not the moving of the thread, it's the unintended consequences of moving the thread that prompted me to start this topic.  Moving the threads, without somehow informing the viewer that they are going to a different area of the forum causes confusion.  And for posting my concern about the confusion, many questionable things have been said about me, by folks who really have no idea who I am or how long I have been around.  Trust me, that was, to say the least, highly frustrating.
In thinking more about this, it might be better to leave the topic header, but in the ONLY REPLY to the message would a post stating the particular thread has been moved to the correct forum. ... please click the following link to continue with this topic.  Let me give an example:
Topic header:  Acrobat activation isn't working
OP:  I keep trying to activate Acrobat and it won't work.  What can I do?
FIRST REPLY:  This question has been posted in the Forum Comments area.  To assist the OP, we have moved the topic to the Acrobat Forum, where they are likely to get answers appropriate to their initial query.  Please use the following link to access this  topic:  insert-link-here.
moderator:  COPY the topic to the Acrobat Forum, but leave a read-only version of the original topic where it was originally posted (ie: Forum Comments) with a slight change to the topic header so as not to confuse the database (such as: Acrobat activation isn't working - thread moved).
Doing something along these lines would allow you to move threads, as needed, but reduce the confusion that DOES result.

Similar Messages

  • Pros and Cons Between UNIX and Windows Servers

    Hi,
    Currently the business I work for runs SAP on UNIX, but there is talk of moving to Windows servers as there are more skills available in SQL.
    It is our belief however, that UNIX servers are more 'stable' than Windows. We believe it would cost more in staff time if there was a transfer to Windows because of more system downtime, due to a larger amount of server updates.
    I would like to know the experiences and opinions of' anyone who has made the switch from UNIX to Windows, or vice versa.
    Has anyone considered moving to Windows and decided against it? What were the pros and cons?
    II'm sure this is an issue that has been considered by many experts. I look forward to reading your responses.
    Regards,
    Luke

    Thanks Michael, that thread is really useful and gives me some good information for my report.
    I'm still interested in hearing more opinions on this. Is there anyone that has successfully fought off a proposed change to Windows from UNIX based on pros and cons, or vice versa? I want to hear both sides of the argument and have a really interesting, opinionated discussion in this thread.
    Regards,
    Luke
    Edited by: Luke Mercer on Apr 22, 2010 6:02 PM

  • What are the pros and cons of storing heavely used CFCs in the application scope?

    I've been storing all the required CFCs for a site in the application scope. During onApplicationStart I do something like this application.objSomeCfc =CreateObject('component', 'com.someCfc').init().
    Here is my reasoning.
    Get the CFCs initialized once and stored in memory for better performance.
    Using CreateObject several times on each page load can have a negative impact on performance.
    Having one place to create application scoped CFCs makes it easier to manage code.
    So is my thinking flawed? Are there any additional pros or cons for dealing with CFCs? Is there any docs, articles, blogs, videos, frameworks, ...... that I should check that may change my perspective on how I'm doing this?
    Thanks

    Your approach is fine, depending on how many and what type of CFCs you are talking about. If they are "singletons" - that is, only one instance of each CFC is needed to be in memory and can be reused/shared from multiple parts of your application - caching them in the application scope is common.  Just make sure they are thread safe ("var" or local.* all your method variables).
    You might consider taking advantage of a dependency injection framework, such as DI/1 (part of the FW/1 MVC framework), ColdSpring, or WireBox (a module of the ColdBox platform that can be used independently).  They have mechanisms for handling and caching singletons.  Then you wouldn't have to go to the application scope to get your CFC instances.
    -Carl V.

  • My PROs And CONs Opinion of This New Forum

    Hello,
    Since I've only been a member for a short time; my exposure has been limited; however, my opinions follow:
    PROs
    This forum has excellent support from "volunteer moderators" and Lenovo Staff. They are literally "all over the place" trying to assist in any way they can.
    I like the forum layout; in that, it is categorized by "machine types" rather than desktop, laptop, hardware, software, audio, etc.
    CONs
    Some of the threads have grown to such an enormous size (I saw one with 517 replies) they have become almost useless. These enormous threads signal one of two things in my opinion. First, either the problem, presented by the original poster, has existed for quite some time without resolution and many keep reporting the same problem or the thread has just become a "me too" dumping ground. In any event, I would recommend that this forum's support group get together and evaluate the pros and cons of keeping super-large threads open for continued response by members of the community.
    BTW, I'm marking this thread as an accepted solution because it is my opinion.
    Best regards,
    pagroundhog
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    See above for my opinions ...

  • Pros and cons of using email sending package in oracle 8.1.6

    hi ,
    i would like to know the advantages /disadvantages of using email sending package from oracle 8.1.6
    compared to sending the same using say perl or php.
    iam developing a site in php/oracle8.1.6 , in which iam supposed to create a payement module.whenever a user
    register(for free trial or subscribing the site) i'll have to send him a welcoming mail.In addition to this iam also supposed to find out wether subscribers are paying cash at right time and if not send them reminder mails and other for related scenarios . i can do the same in Perl or PHP.but if iam not gaining much(say based on server performance or load) then i think i can go ahead with oracle package. when i tested it i found that its slow . what about the load that it may cause for the server (ours is linux ).
    please do give inputs on this

    Hi Ravi,
    Thanks for your reply.
    But I am specifically looking at pros and cons for web services. So the thread which you passed to me won't help.
    Regards
    Nitin.

  • 11g upgrade pros and cons

    Folks,
    If there's already a similar thread, apologies in advance.
    I wanted to gather some information on the pros and cons of upgrading to 11g from 9i and from 10g (Enterprise Editio) rdbms on Solaris.
    What are the challenges you have faced (especially if you have tweak SQLs/optimizer etc.) post upgrade?
    Any issues DURING the upgrade?
    If I missed anything obvious that worth bringing up, please do so.
    Thanks for your time!
    Regards..

    Pros/cons depends on the database type and activities ( no. of user/ data/ transaction etc).
    but i would suggest upgrade your database (9i is history).
    you will get many new features in database which are not available in 9i.
    1. upgrade on test server
    2. check the performance
    3. everything goes well
    4. upgrade on live server

  • Neptune for UI development Pros and Cons

    Hi ,
    we are evaluating neptune for UI development for what are the pros and cons of using neptune.
    i see only that webdynpro abap developer can be easily moved to neptune , some javascript knowledge is still required.
    some question
    1) can neptune make calls to odata services ? do that requires code in javascript or ABAP
    2) any accelerators provided by neptune  like for workflow scenarios , list and details .
    3) can sap standard fiori apps extensibility  or modification is possible through neptune
    4) security if its accessing business functionality directly
    regards
    Yashpal

    Hi Yashpal,
    I will give you my view, but as Robbe says I work for the company and other SAP developers like DJ Adams has other development tool preferences than me ( I call his Sublime Text development spaghetti coding and he sees Neptune as a crutch that restricts a developer's freedom but this is just a friendly point-of-view discussion and I have promised him a beer in Walldorf next time our paths cross there)
    So the important message is that SAP has opened up their platform for different development tools and it is now a choice for the individual developer or SAP customer. This is a fantastic move by SAP and I think a bit overlooked by the community, Look at the new Xamarin partnership as an example (and yes they are a competitor, but I did mention them )
    Now the pros of Neptune are in my opinion:
    ABAP developer friendly development (removed 90% of JavaScripting needed)
    Connected to the SAP transport System (Software Logistics as is)
    Drag Drop designer that gives structured code (easy for a new developer to take over code, compared to the spaghetti provided by DJ <-  I'll need to buy a few extra beers for that remark)
    Native json communication provided by the Neptune Server (you can argue all you want about Odata, our solution is more flexible gives incredible performance and superb and easy to use offline capabilities)
    Integration with Adobe build, use an SAP program to generate hybrid apps  (The average ABAP developer does not install cordova and build hybrid apps - with Neptune he/she does)
    Integration with SMP. Automatic connection with the REST API's of SMP both on-premise and in the Cloud
    Reduced time to market. One of the largest SAP implementation partners in the Nordics stated that Neptune reduced development time by 80%
    Free templates (Advanced templates such as fully functional PM, HCM, SD templates are available Experience | Neptune Software  <- sorry for the marketing but you did ask)
    UI5, all of the other third-party tools (Not SAP tools like App Builder, Eclipse etc) uses non UI5 frameworks. I personally believe that SAPUI5 (UI5) is the future of SAP UX and thus it only makes sense to keep a common and future-proof framework.
    Network crunching. We optimize all networking. Which makes sense for mobility.
    no extra infrastructure needed - it is a certified add-on and takes 15 mins to install.
    Works with most versions of SAP. We even have alot of customers using 4.7 (we need the ICF so nothing lower). This is something the community often forgets. Yes it is cool to play with the latest Netweaver release, but do our customers have that installed?
    Cons (woot!)
    Cost, even if Neptune is very affordable it still requires license for productive usage (free for developers though - and hey we need to live as well ) So custom coding  is cheaper in respect to license (but not in TCO in my opinion)
    Generated code, even if we have added as much freedom to code custom JavaScript as possible there will always be restrictions in generated code compared to notepad. (But I haven't met an issue that couldn't be solved by custom coding in the Neptune Application Designer yet)
    Other backend systems. Neptune is based on ABAP and as such it obviosly works best with an ABAP backend.
    .... (Add stuff from other non Neptune ppl )
    Regarding your questions:
    1. Yes you can use Odata, best way is to consume it on the ABAP level, but you can of course consume it through JavaScript as well (Not recomended by me)
    2. Yes see above (free templates and also premium templates by our partners)
    3. No you can't modify a fiori app with Neptune, but the two solutions work perfectly together (You can add Neptune apps in the Fiori launchpad) One of our partners have created an RDS solution based on both Fiori and Neptune.
    4. Neptune is an add-on to Netweaver and as such has no extra security in itself beyond that (And we seek not to do that). But we support any security you wish to add on top. I strongly advice having a look at the SAP Secure offering (App protection and MDM)  as well as SMP (also the new Cloud edition which gives easy affordable protection for your backend)
    So that was my very biased answer
    Njål

  • FROYO Pros and Cons

    For those who are running FROYO let's have a pros and cons thread so some of the others who are on the fence about running it will get a little more info.  And PLEASE don't include any links,instructions,etc. and hopefully the VZW folks will allow it to stay as an informative thread only.
    Pros: 
    Little more responsive
    Flash 10.1
    Choice of unlock screens, pin,password,or current ones.
    Google Search is back (still includes Bing as well).
    Cons:
    Battery life not as good as 2.1 (on my device anyway).
    Warranty may be voided, not official VZW yet.
    Can't get it over the air, which I personally don't care for anyway. Have had a couple bad experiences with OTA in the past.
    These are a few I can think of at the moment.

    gsp10 wrote:
    People Have that much used on ipods and iphone used up so in pretty sure you can fill up an android pretty fast to
    That's because apple only gives you one storage area so all of your apps, music, videos, etc are there.  On Android, most of the memory heavy content will be on the sd card and not the internal storage.  I could see the internal storage filling up if you have NFS Shift, Madden and a bunch of other games of that size but then you most likely just have your phone filled up with a bunch of crud that you never use.  
    nickjr wrote:
    How did you get Flash 10.1 installed? Iam not able to d/l due to the 2.2 restrictions
     I cheated.

  • Too worried to upgrade software. The pros and cons

    From a NOkia lover to others, 
    I am all for making improvements and fully understand that we can't always get it right first time every time but atm I am too concerned with the fact that updating my software will create problems that are non-existent in my eyes.
    My girlfriend updated her (my old) N70 software last week and now her phone is in the repair shop. This could just be a coincidence but....
    I had an N95 (on orange) and was stung when the "unlucky for some" version 13 was installed on the handset. See the epic thread here "N95 firmware upgrade affects battery life" (couldn't post link) 
    I carried out the full back up to my card as instructed but the games I purchased would no longer work so had to re-buy them. The battery life was killed in eight hours due to the wlan making a connection attempt as long as the battery would allow it to happen. The point is... all of this was not happening before the update. 
    It was that bad that in the end I was forced to upgrade / get a new contract before I was entitled to one from Orange and had to fork out for two contracts to get the handset spec I needed.
    I now have an N95 8GB and have no qualms with it what so ever. It has version 20 atm and pc suite informs me there is an update every time I boot the program up. So far.. I have declined to update.
    So what are the pros and cons and is it more of a risk to chance losing the licenses I have paid for and update if nothing is wrong?
    Best Regards
    SgtTrojan 
    The swordsman that goes to war thinking of saving himself had better not go to war at all.

    I myself am also worried. A friend of mine told me if there is no porblem with your current version of firmware for your phone then why update? It is not a assurance that after updating there would be no problems/bugs with the new version.My friend has a point. Why would we update if there is no problem with your current firmware version? Some would say it would be faster, there would be more improvements to the music ( which I know would be depending with your hardware and not the software).
    I am thinking of updating my firmware with a Nokia Service Center here in my country (Philippines). It is for free at the moment because my phone ins under 1 year Warranty. But I am thinking twice after what my friend told me.
    I hope my opinion helps you all out here.

  • Pros and Cons of the new update

    I updated one of my ATV to version 2. I would like to try and concisely start a thread which list the Pros and Cons of the latest version 2 update.
    So far after updating one of the ATVs I have only 2 observations:
    Pro - unit seems to run somewhat cooler - (yes one ATV is Version 1 and 1 ATV is version 2, it is obvious)
    Con - No looping or shuffle on Music Videos (Good Grief!)
    Thanks all, Mike
    PS - Concisely is key

    Pro - the library selection of renting and buying is great.
    Con - no continuous playing of videos / music video playlist.
    Con - no continuous playing of videos / music video playlist.
    Con - no continuous playing of videos / music video playlist.
    Con - no continuous playing of videos / music video playlist.
    I was extremely disappointed by this. As much as people were practically "begging' for this piece of functionality on these discussion boards, I really cannot believe Apple didn't fix this. The coolness factor of Apple TV would quadruple if I can just make a playlist of the 50+ music videos I bought from ITMS. Not to mention - I collet vintage movie trailers and old commercials and randomly playing these on my TV was the entire reason I bought Apple TV in the first place. It's unbelivably annoying that I have to manually select the next video in the list every 60 seconds. All the features they added are great, but they are completely overshadowed by this annoying and seemingly unnecessary usability issue.

  • Pros and cons Demand Planning in APO or ECC

    Hello,
    is there a paper/pdf out there describing the pros and cons of DP in APO and ECC. We are planning to implement demand planning and are in an evaluation face whether to go with an APO solution or not. The financial aspect is not an issue. We already have the licensing in place for APO and ECC.
    Which solution provides better flexibility and usability? Have any of you guys got experience with implementing demand planning in a non-manufacturing orgnisation. That is we are looking for a tool to forecast/plan external and internal procurement.
    Any suggestions are  welcome.

    Hi ,
    Definitely APO DP have many advantage over ECC. 
    => More Flexibility than ECC demand management
    => Complex statistical tool can be used for forecasting
    => Complex macros can be build as per the business need
    => Easy visilbility & maintenance of the data
    => Advance Demand planning functionalities like Promotional planning, LCM, Management decisions, etc can be incorporated easily.
    Also refer the details provided in the below thread for more details:
    General Discussion - Why to choose APO over R/3 for planning?
    Re: General Discussion - Why to choose APO over R/3 for planning?
    Hope this helps,
    Nawanit

  • HT204053 What are the pros and cons of 1) choosing to use the SAME Apple ID for iCloud services on one side, and purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore, on the other side; or 2) to have and use two separate Apple Ids for these "two sides

    All is in the title, so I repeat it below with a better identation.
    What are the pros and cons of
    1) choosing to use the SAME
                                                  Apple ID for iCloud services on one side, and
                                                  purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore, on the other side; or
    2) to have and use two separate Apple Ids for these "two sides"?
    P.S.
    I have loads and loads of free podcasts in iTunes in my iMac, that are certainly more thant the 5 gigas the iCloud provides for free, so I don't want those to go to the cloud. But this is perhaps a different question...
    Also need to mention that I have itunes on a mac, a pc and an iphone.
    Sorry to look so silly with this question, but I don't get the "big picture".

    You need to create a user account for your wife (or yourself depending on who has the current user account). When syncing, each of you should sign in as a separate user, login to iTunes and then sync. I had this problem when my sister got an iPhone. When we did her initial sync, everything on my iPhone showed up on hers. Apple gave me this solution.

  • What are the Pros and Cons while joining tables at DF and Universe level

    Hi Experts,
    I am new to Data federator designer. I need help on the below.
    Could you please let me know the Pros and Cons while joining the source tables in data federator
    And While joining the DF target tables in universe designer.
    Regards,
    Gana

    Hi,
    1. I have created target tables based on source tables with one to one mapping and then join all target tables in universe.
    Ex: Source tables: Infocube text tables, fact tables and 3rd party data base table
    Target tables:Target tables are same as source tables
    --- Yes this is the way to create target Tables  and join them in the universe.These target Tables gives you the flexibility  like in future your requirement is to add one more object based on some calculation which is not possible in the universe so that time you can create  one more column in the target table and do the calculation. at the same time if you are using source table you can not do anything.
    2. Created single target table with all objects of source tables and merged all sources tables data.
    Ex: Source tables: Infocube text tables, fact tables and 3rd party data base table
    Target table: Single table.
    --- This is bit complex structure to merge all tables data in the one target table.in this situation you have to put more efforts and it is more complex.basically this type of target table is useful when you are merging data by multiple source into single  or  creating one target table based on the  union of tables by adding two mapping rules or more and you can not join tables in universe.
    Better approach is first 1. create target tables based on the source tables and join them in the universe.
    Thanks,
    Amit

  • Pros and Cons not determining / having a Delivery Plant in Sales Order?

    Hi Mates
    Here I have come-up with one more (weired?) requirement from my client.
    We have two plants manufacturing same product and supplying to all customers (some time in same sales order with two different line items).
    At the timeof creating a sales order, marketing does't know from which plant the material will move and hence they don't want to fill the Delivering Plant field (VBRP-BUKRS at Shipping tab) for each Item.
    They are insisting me to map it as above though I had explained about various pros and cons for not determining a mandatory delivery plant
    in sales order like the requirements and shipping stuff.
    Yet, yet they want this.
    Has anyone come across this kind of requirement before? What best you had done for that?
    Can I ask you what are the Pros and cons on not having a Delivery Plant at Sales Order level?
    what if I could determine it Delivery level?
    Any comments, suggestions, replies and advices are taken humbly.
    Cheers
    Ajay Kumar Veeranki

    Dear Mahulenka
    Thanks a lot for the reply. It do have helped me.
    Yest it is VBAP-WERKS (typo error ).
    Infact I had given the same solution for the issue.
    Interstingly, they are insisting on a better solution fit for their requirement. Anyway shall 'highlight' the points again to them try to get it solved
    Just wondering has anyone faced the same situation before.
    Thanks again for the reply and good luck
    Best Regards
    Ajay Kumar Veeranki

  • What are the Pros and Cons of Using Batch Numbers over Serialization

    Dear SAP Gurus:
    Will someone please give me the benefits of using Batch Management over serial numbers in this case scenerio, or vice versa:
    Client wants to trace all the components of an assembly in a BOM.  Even the Raw material.  The client sends the material out today and has the vendor assign serial numbers to the individual pieces, the client gives the range of serial numbers to use.  We are looking at using batch numbers to accomplish this and issue one material and batch number to a production order.  Then use MB56 batch where used functionality to view history.  I am wanting to understand the benefits of this.  Please advise and points will be awarded as always. 
    Also, in this scenerio, can you issue multiple material/batch numbers to one vendor op that has its own production order?

    Yes it is a subcontract. 
    Example:  This is the solution but need the pros and cons of doing this scenerio
    Sheet of metal sent to vendor to make lets say 1800 peices of material number nas5703-01.  All 1800 pieces come back and issued to a production work order using one bacth number for one material item so that batch number can be traced in history in MB56 and a fit up report.

Maybe you are looking for