Multi-Owner Diskset problem with SC3.1U4 & Solaris 10

Hi All,
My Problem is after configured the mulit-owner diskset of SVM. If either one node has been restarted/rebooted. The rebooted node can't join back to the diskset like below status. I have tried to use some metaset commands to put the rebooted node to join backed the diskset but failed.
After both nodes rebooted. Then I run "metaset" command on both nodes, the status seems can't synchronize. "See below status for detail"
root@IMDUFSDBM01 # metaset -s racset
Multi-owner Set name = racset, Set number = 1, Master = IMDUFSDBM01
Host Owner Member
IMDUFSDBM01 Yes
IMDUFSDBM02 No
Driv Dbase
d6 Yes
root@IMDUFSDBM02 # metaset -s racset
Multi-owner Set name = racset, Set number = 1, Master =
Master and owner information unavailable until joined (metaset -j)
Host Owner Member
IMDUFSDBM01 multi-owner Yes
IMDUFSDBM02 No
Driv Dbase
d6 Yes
-------------------------------------------------------------------------Failed to use commands to put the IMDFUSDBM02 to diskset "racset".
root@IMDUFSDBM01 # metaset -s racset
Multi-owner Set name = racset, Set number = 1, Master = IMDUFSDBM01
Host Owner Member
IMDUFSDBM01 multi-owner Yes
Driv Dbase
d6 Yes root@IMDUFSDBM01 # metaset -s racset -d -h IMDUFSDBM02
metaset: IMDUFSDBM01: racset: host IMDUFSDBM02 does not have set
root@IMDUFSDBM01 # metaset -s racset -M -a -h IMDUFSDBM02
metaset: IMDUFSDBM01: racset: host IMDUFSDBM02 is already in the set
Dear all, any idea or experience on this problem?
Chowsingsing from Hong Kong

Hi Tim/All,
I have party fixed the multi-owner diskset problem after create the resource for SUNW.rac_framework, SUNW.rac_udlm & SUNW.rac_svm. But the new problem is generated. The new problem is if two nodes are up, then the multi-owner diskset can be access via two nodes. But if either one node is down, the remain node can�t access the diskset (but the scstat status is fine). For example: node2 is down, node1 is up. Then multi-owner diskset membership of node1 is lost. If node1 is down, node2 is up. Then multi-owner diskset membership of node2 is lost. After both nodes become online, the diskset will resume to normal and can be access.
normal status of scstat and metaset
-- Cluster Nodes --
Node name Status
Cluster node: node2 Online
Cluster node: node1 Online
-- Cluster Transport Paths --
Endpoint Endpoint Status
Transport path: node2:qfe1 node1:qfe1 Path online
Transport path: node2:qfe0 node1:qfe0 Path online
-- Quorum Summary --
Quorum votes possible: 3
Quorum votes needed: 2
Quorum votes present: 3
-- Quorum Votes by Node --
Node Name Present Possible Status
Node votes: node2 1 1 Online
Node votes: node1 1 1 Online
-- Quorum Votes by Device --
Device Name Present Possible Status
Device votes: /dev/did/rdsk/d2s2 1 1 Online
-- Device Group Servers --
Device Group Primary Secondary
-- Device Group Status --
Device Group Status
-- Multi-owner Device Groups --
Device Group Online Status
Multi-owner device group: racset node1,node2
-- Resource Groups and Resources --
Group Name Resources
Resources: rac-rg rac-framework-rs rac-udlm-rs rac-svm-rs
-- Resource Groups --
Group Name Node Name State
Group: rac-rg node1 Online
Group: rac-rg node2 Online
-- Resources --
Resource Name Node Name State Status Message
Resource: rac-framework-rs node1 Online Online
Resource: rac-framework-rs node2 Online Online
Resource: rac-udlm-rs node1 Online Online
Resource: rac-udlm-rs node2 Online Online
Resource: rac-svm-rs node1 Online Online
Resource: rac-svm-rs node2 Online Online
-- IPMP Groups --
Node Name Group Status Adapter Status
IPMP Group: node2 sc_ipmp0 Online hme1 Online
IPMP Group: node2 sc_ipmp0 Online hme0 Online
IPMP Group: node1 sc_ipmp0 Online hme1 Online
IPMP Group: node1 sc_ipmp0 Online hme0 Online
Multi-owner Set name = racset, Set number = 1, Master = node1
Host Owner Member
node1 multi-owner Yes
node2 multi-owner Yes
Mediator Host(s) Aliases
node1
node2
Driv Dbase
d2 Yes
After shutdown node1, node2 remain running
-- Cluster Nodes --
Node name Status
Cluster node: node2 Online
Cluster node: node1 Offline
-- Cluster Transport Paths --
Endpoint Endpoint Status
Transport path: node2:qfe1 node1:qfe1 faulted
Transport path: node2:qfe0 node1:qfe0 faulted
-- Quorum Summary --
Quorum votes possible: 3
Quorum votes needed: 2
Quorum votes present: 2
-- Quorum Votes by Node --
Node Name Present Possible Status
Node votes: node2 1 1 Online
Node votes: node1 0 1 Offline
-- Quorum Votes by Device --
Device Name Present Possible Status
Device votes: /dev/did/rdsk/d2s2 1 1 Online
-- Device Group Servers --
Device Group Primary Secondary
-- Device Group Status --
Device Group Status
-- Multi-owner Device Groups --
Device Group Online Status
Multi-owner device group: racset node2
-- Resource Groups and Resources --
Group Name Resources
Resources: rac-rg rac-framework-rs rac-udlm-rs rac-svm-rs
-- Resource Groups --
Group Name Node Name State
Group: rac-rg node1 Offline
Group: rac-rg node2 Online
-- Resources --
Resource Name Node Name State Status Message
Resource: rac-framework-rs node1 Offline Offline
Resource: rac-framework-rs node2 Online Online
Resource: rac-udlm-rs node1 Offline Offline
Resource: rac-udlm-rs node2 Online Online
Resource: rac-svm-rs node1 Offline Offline
Resource: rac-svm-rs node2 Online Online
-- IPMP Groups --
Node Name Group Status Adapter Status
IPMP Group: node2 sc_ipmp0 Online hme1 Online
IPMP Group: node2 sc_ipmp0 Online hme0 Online
Multi-owner Set name = racset, Set number = 1, Master = node1
Host Owner Member
node1 multi-owner Yes
node2 No
Mediator Host(s) Aliases
node1
node2
Driv Dbase
d2 Yes
Anyone can help!!
Chowsingsing from HK

Similar Messages

Problem with IPSec on solaris 9

Hi all
I'm facing a problem with IPSec on solaris 9 that I didn't have with Solaris 8 (With the Security package installed).
I've an application that creates SA's by using the pf-key interface.
What it does is first doing a GETSPI to a specific SPI and a specific Destination IP Address.
This will create an SA and put it in a LARVAL state. After about a minute my application will do an UPDATE to this SPI and that command should change the state of the SA from LARVAL to MATURE but instead I get an error saying that this SPI & IP address already exist (errno = 17).
Well of course it's already exist that's the all point it should just change the state of an existing SA.
This exact scenarion was is working fine on Solaris 8.
Am I doing somthing wrong (maybe there is a package on the solaris 9 that I need to install ?)
or is this a bug in solaris 9.
If anyone has any idea on how to do that (without using a one step ADD for a new SA) I will be very thankfull.

Sorry for using reply for querying.
I got a problem in creating a Security Association using the PF_KEY Socket (first used SADB_GETSPI and got SPI,with SPI tried to update SADB_UPDATE).
Getting this problem on Sun Solaris 8.
It returns errno 122 . operation not supported.
Here is my mailId [email protected]
I got few more queries regarding PF_KEY socket.
Not much directions are available also for pf_key socket in internet.
Monitor produces the following error.
# ipseckey monitor
"Base message (version 2) type UPDATE, SA type AH.
Error Operation not supported on transport endpoint from PF_KEY.
Message length 16 bytes, seq=4294967294, pid=450."
Here is my mailId [email protected]
Thanks in Advance.
ssundar.

Problem with telnet on solaris 9

Hi all,
I have a problem with telnet on my sun fire v440 server with solaris 9 system, whenever I telnet to this server as a normal user ,after entering the username and password ,the user environment will switch to root. but i have checked the 'id' as i telnet the system ,it was not root. Pls refer the below message as i login the server:
SunOS 5.9
login: prad
Password:
Last login: Thu Apr 14 11:14:54 from 10.60.64.59
Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.9       Generic May 2002
You have mail.
root@T-Server02 # id
uid=1017(prad) gid=10(staff)
root@T-Server02 # cat /etc/passwd | grep prad
prad:x:1017:10::/export/home/prad:/bin/sh
root@T-Server02 # ls -lrt profile*
-rwxrwxrwx   1 prad     other        174 Feb 7 2008 local.profile
-rw-r--r--   1 prad     other        144 Feb 7 2008 backupprofile
root@T-Server02 # pwd
*/export/home/prad*
root@T-Server02 #
Does any one have idea on how to solve this problem?

Thanks . I'm pretty new in SUN OS, and not quite get your point . Here is the local.profile showed as below:
This is a newly happened issue, I think we haven't change any profile setting in server:
SunOS 5.9
login: prad
Password:
Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.9       Generic May 2002
You have mail.
root@T-Server02 # more local.profile
*# Copyright (c) 2001 by Sun Microsystems, Inc.*
*# All rights reserved.*
*# ident "@(#)local.profile 1.10 01/06/23 SMI"*
stty istrip
PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/ucb:/etc:.
export PATH
root@T-Server02 #

Problem with Java in solaris 10 zone

HI ,
i get this error message in my solaris 10 zone :
#./java version
Exception java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: requested -4 bytes for size_t in /BUILD_AREA/jdk1.5.0_11/hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/os_solaris.cpp. Out of swap space?
in global zone , java works fine !
uname -a
SunOS Server 5.10 Generic_141414-07 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise
best regards

I see mention of a similar problem, but only with early development releases of solaris10 branded zones running on Solaris 11 development bits. It seems as though this is not what you are running.
Since there are no swap caps nor brand emulation in place, the next thing I would suspect would be that you somehow have inconsistencies between key libraries (e.g. libc) and the kernel. This could happen if you have a full-root zone that has been force attached (zoneadm -z <zone> attach -F). In the past, I've seen products that do this under the covers (e.g. Veritas Cluster) so it may have happened without your knowledge. If it is a sparse root zone, you may want to run "zoneadm -z <zone> detach; zoneadm -z <zone> attach -u". Prior to doing so, take whatever precautions you would normally take when patching a system.
If you open a support call about this I bet the first advice you are going to get is to patch, as you seem to be 2+ years behind. Also, newer releases of Java 5 are available at http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javasebusiness/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase5-419410.html.

Problem with Jni on Solaris

Hello I am using a Native code that is working perfect on Windows .
I have used DllMain calls to initialize my threads .
I attach my lower stack threads to the JNI by using these methods.
Well I want to know what is way to put the same functionality on Solaris.As this particular method is specific to Windows Platform only.
BOOL APIENTRY DllMain( HANDLE hModule,                     // handle to DLL module
DWORD ul_reason_for_call,      // reason for calling function
LPVOID lpReserved                // reserved
     BOOL returnValue = FALSE;
switch (ul_reason_for_call)
          case DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH:
               // We do not perform any initialization
               // within this section. Instead we have
               // chosen to use the JNI_OnLoad function
               // as the library initialization point.
               returnValue = TRUE;
               break;
          case DLL_THREAD_ATTACH:
               // We are to initialize the thread local storage
               // variables in this call.
               if( BridgeUtility::getInstance() -> threadInitialize() != 0 ) {
                    returnValue = FALSE;
                    printf(" Thread initialize failed..\n");
               }else {
                    printf(" Thread initialize succed..\n");
                    returnValue = TRUE;
               break;
          case DLL_THREAD_DETACH:
               // We are to uninitialize the thread local storage
               // variables in this call.
               if( BridgeUtility::getInstance() -> threadUninitialize() != 0 )
                    returnValue = FALSE;
               else
                    returnValue = TRUE;
               break;
          case DLL_PROCESS_DETACH:
               // We do not perform any uninitialization
               // within this section. Instead we have
               // chosen to use the JNI_OnUnload function
               // as the library initialization point.
               returnValue = TRUE;
               break;

If your aim is to load the library and initialize it
that one time, consider using the pthread once routines
to handle library initialization. See, for example,
chapter 5 of Butenhof's "Programming with POSIX
threads".

Problem with Syslog in Solaris 10

I have 2 hosts (both are actually Solaris 10 Zones). One has no issues with syslog and the other won't send its messages to our loghost. Both have the same /etc/syslog.conf files, /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/nsswitch.conf files. The one works and the other just says in the /var/adm/messages files :
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 22: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 23: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 28: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 29: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 30: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 31: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 32: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 33: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 34: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 35: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 36: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 37: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 38: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
May 3 11:16:42 svanyc128 syslogd: line 39: WARNING: loghost could not be resolved
I can resolve the name loghost though with ping and nslookup and they're going to the correct IP. Does anyone have any other idea why these hosts don't behave the same?

Ah, one of the guys I work with figured it out. /etc/services file was messed up. It's working now. :)

Problems with oracle10 and solaris 10

Hello,
I been trying for 3 days to install and make oracle 10g work with solaris 10. I've downloaded oracle 10.1.0.2 (it's the only one available for solaris 64 bitS). I've followed every bit of documentation I found in this forum but still no go. I've read this thread and followed did what it says but still no go.
Oracle Database10g on Solaris 10
My questions are:
1. I've set the semsys and shmsys as instructed in the documentation, but when I run the installer and it comes to the checking kernel security paramters it says that I need to update the kernel system paramaters BIT_SIZE and noexec_user_stack. According to the docs that I've read, the noexec_user_stack is only for soalris versions up to 5.8, but just to test I added it to the kernel but I still get the same error. What gives? Where do I change the BIT_SIZE and what value should i put?
2. After ignoring these errors, and the installation has finished, I get this error on the console
Aug 1 18:19:18 db1 root: [ID 702911 user.alert] (Oracle CSSD will be run out of init)
Any assistance will be very much appreciated.
Thanks

I've downloaded oracle 10.1.0.2 (it's the only one available for solaris 64 bitS).I hope you installing this on Solaris Sparc 64bit.
According to the docs that I've read, the noexec_user_stack is only for soalris versions up to 5.8noexec_user_stack was introduced in Solaris 7 and is valid for all >7 versions (9, 10 too)
Aug 1 18:19:18 db1 root: [ID 702911 user.alert] (Oracle CSSD will be run out of init)You could safely ignore this message

Problems with sudo on Solaris 8

Greetings all,
I am trying to set up user accounts with scripts that will restart services, should they fail. I am setting up the default shell as the script that I want to have run when they log in and at the completion it will kick them off. A nice secure way to get things going again without our network operations people getting their hands dirty.
I am attempting to use sudo for this and it keeps asking for a password even though I have put in the ALL=NOPASSWD tag in the sudoers file for this users entry. When I enter the users password it is not correct and when I enter root it is not correct and in the end it will not run the script. I need to somehow bypass this asking of a password and get sudo to run the command. This is to restart our SunOne messaging server and will likely be applied to various other processes.
Any suggestions are appreciated. I have checked the sudo site and checked the config.h from the compile and had no luck so it is not the shadow passwords issue that they list on their support site. I also tried to download and use the precompiled package that they had on SunFreeware, but that will not install on to any of these servers... can't get pkgadd to acknowledge it as a solaris package.
Thank you in advance!
Lee Stevens

Try to remove this disk from server and insert in again.
Then run devfsadm command.

Problems with rsh in solaris 8

I have tried to execute a command with "rsh", like a "prstat", and it works but if I execute a "snoop" command, I see that the machine that runs the command(rsh) lost information. There is packets from TCP that has been return (in some occasions partially), this provokes the application losts information.
Which can the problem be ?

OK, but the problem is not in C++. Your C++ code just invokes invokes the shell and remote operations, and returns the result. The local C++ program cannot cause or repair communication problems between machines.

Problems with LDOMs in Solaris 11

I got a new T5-2 server, installed Solaris 11 and was going to configure LDOMs. However "ldmd" can't be started and in turn ldm doesn't work.
root@Solaris11U1-T5:/opt/SUNWldm/bin#
root@Solaris11U1-T5:/opt/SUNWldm/bin# ldm
Failed to connect to logical domain manager: Connection refused
root@Solaris11U1-T5:/opt/SUNWldm/bin# svcadm enable svc:/ldoms/ldmd:default
root@Solaris11U1-T5:/opt/SUNWldm/bin# svcs | grep svc:/ldoms/ldmd:default
maintenance    12:22:28 svc:/ldoms/ldmd:default
root@Solaris11U1-T5:/opt/SUNWldm/bin# tail /var/svc/log/ldoms-ldmd\:default.log
[ Sep 3 12:08:35 Disabled. ]
[ Sep 3 12:08:39 Enabled. ]
[ Sep 3 12:08:39 Executing start method ("/opt/SUNWldm/bin/ldmd_start"). ]
Sep 03 12:08:39 fatal error: HV MD unable to assign frag @ 0x0.0x3900000 from free PRI list
[ Sep 3 12:08:41 Method "start" exited with status 95. ]
[ Sep 3 12:22:25 Enabled. ]
[ Sep 3 12:22:25 Rereading configuration. ]
[ Sep 3 12:22:25 Executing start method ("/opt/SUNWldm/bin/ldmd_start"). ]
Sep 03 12:22:25 fatal error: HV MD unable to assign frag @ 0x0.0x3900000 from free PRI list
[ Sep 3 12:22:28 Method "start" exited with status 95. ]
root@Solaris11U1-T5:/opt/SUNWldm/bin#

Hi 69768d81-19e9-4597-ad17-b29f5c618a87
I am also getting the same error (fatal error: HV MD unable to assign frag @ 0x0.0x3900000 from free PRI list) while booting the Solaris 11.1 server on T5-2.
Can you please let me know how did you upgrade the SRU version.
Nov 14 11:23:21 fatal error: HV MD unable to assign frag @ 0x0.0x3900000 from free PRI list
[ Nov 14 11:23:24 Method "start" exited with status 95. ]
[ Nov 14 12:05:42 Enabled. ]
[ Nov 14 12:05:42 Rereading configuration. ]
root@blrgxr2701:~# pkg info entire
          Name: entire
       Summary: Incorporation to lock all system packages to the same build
   Description: This package constrains system package versions to the same
                build. WARNING: Proper system update and correct package
                selection depend on the presence of this incorporation.
                Removing this package will result in an unsupported system.
      Category: Meta Packages/Incorporations
         State: Installed
     Publisher: solaris
       Version: 0.5.11
Build Release: 5.11
        Branch: 0.175.1.0.0.24.2
Packaging Date: September 19, 2012 07:01:35 PM
          Size: 5.46 kB
          FMRI: pkg://solaris/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.2:20120919T190135Z
root@blrgxr2701:~# pkg update --accept
No updates available for this image.
root@blrgxr2701:~# pkg update --be-name s11.1sru --accept
No updates available for this image.
Thanks.
Prasad P.

Problems with fpsetmask and SIGFPE

Hello,
I am trying to build a program that wants to do its own floating point exception handling. The developer has told me that on Sparc, using fpsetmask in ieeefp.h works. However, when I build it with the same instuctions on x86, I still get floating point exceptions. The author told me that he thought the problem was with fpsetmask in x86. Does anyone know if there are problems with this in Solaris 7 x86? Is there a fix? I searched the patches, but did not find anything. Thanks for your time.
Brian

I'm still wondering why it happens now at this moment in time...
PC does seem to be a bit odd & inconsistent, the few times I've tested with it, at least so far as we content filtering goes; and if I remember rightly, you're not the first to report previously ok settings suddenly preventing some or all internet until pc is switched off altogether.
It may work when re-enabled

Why doesn't anyone confess iOS6 has a problem with bluetooth??

I've posted twice now asking why there seems to be a problem with my iPhone 4s iOS6 pairing with Beats wireless headphones. No answers at all.
Is there a problem with saying "since upgrade to iOS6, apple bluetooth has had a problem"??
I read endless accounts of apple owners having problems with this and I have just bought a very expensive set of headphones which are supposted to work if I quote apple, but they simply don't. This is very poor show. With maps and now this, I question if iPhones are now worth the money??

Stupidly, I finally upgraded iPad to iOS6 last week after putting it off for ages. Almost immediately, I started having problems with the Bluetooth connectivity between my Kensington keyboard (designed for iPad) and the device. I didn't realise what it was and thought the keyboard itself had died. It stopped working altogether when I told the iPad to forget the keyboard so that I could try re-pairing.
So I bought a new one! And now I discover that the problem is almost certainly the iOS upgrade.
That's pretty inconvenient as I type almost everything on my iPad and don't have a laptop. The keyboard won't pair with my iPhone either - also upgraded to iOS6 last week.
Apple, please get your act together and sort out a fix for this. It's costing people time and money. And it'll certainly drive me to Android next time.

Problem with multi row delete

Hi, I'm new in apex and I tried to build master detail report on some view. Everything is cool but "delete checked" doesn't work.
"ORA-20001: Error in multi row delete operation: row= , ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: NULL index table key value,"
the problem is that I don't know what is wrong :), I have a special trigger "instead of delete on MY_VIEW", but in this error problem is not explained.
Anybody knows what can be wrong? It is probably a problem with trigger or multi row doesn't work with views? I couldn't find how MRD knows what kind of statement use to delete rows so I don't know if the statement that program used is correct. In debug it lokks that:
0.32: ...Do not run process "ApplyMRU", process point=AFTER_SUBMIT, condition type=REQUEST_IN_CONDITION, when button pressed=
0.32: ...Process "ApplyMRD": MULTI_ROW_DELETE (AFTER_SUBMIT) #OWNER#:MY_VIEW:ITEM1:ITEM2
0.33: Show ERROR page...
0.33: Performing rollback...
thanks for any help
//sorry for english mistakes
edit: it doesn't matter if I use in trigger delete from ... where item1=:OLD.item1 ; or if I use item1=:P4_item1 (which actually saves correct values)
Edited by: user5931224 on 2009-06-13 08:55

I realised that this is not a problem with trigger, I changed trigger to "NULL;" and problem is the same. Maybe sb used master detail on view not only on tables and know what can be wrong in this situation?

X86 Solaris 10 problems with ipfilter

Colleagues,
I'm install Solaris 10 on HP Proliant DL360 G4
(listed in HCL for Solaris OS http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/sol/systems/details/691.html)
Everything works fine till, but when I increase loading
(DNS server there, so too much UDP packets, about 2000/sec) Solaris panic with:
Nov 30 10:35:45 d0 ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=ffffffff85759820:
Nov 30 10:35:45 d0 genunix: [ID 103648 kern.notice] mutex_exit: not owner, lp=0 owner=0 thread=ffffffff85759820
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice]
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08190 unix:mutex_panic+6f (0, ffffffff860f5d98, fffffe)
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c081b0 unix:mutex_vector_exit+39 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c081e0 ipf:ipf_stinsert+333e9215 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08210 ipf:fr_updatestate+61 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08250 ipf:fr_checkstate+10f ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08390 ipf:fr_check+629 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08530 pfil:pfil_precheck+850 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08560 pfil:pfilmodwput+9f ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c085c0 unix:putnext+1f1 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c086d0 ip:ip_wput_ire+1a98 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08780 ip:ip_output+ee9 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08790 ip:ip_wput+18 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c087f0 unix:putnext+1f1 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08870 udp:udp_wput+29d ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c088d0 unix:putnext+1f1 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08a70 genunix:strput+3bc ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08af0 genunix:kstrputmsg+1e8 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08ba0 sockfs:sosend_dgram+181 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08c10 sockfs:sotpi_sendmsg+1bc ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08c80 sockfs:sendit+f0 ()
Nov 30 10:35:46 d0 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe8000c08ed0 sockfs:sendmsg+1bf ()
Nov 30 10:35:47 d0 unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice]
Nov 30 10:35:47 d0 genunix: [ID 672855 kern.notice] syncing file systems...
Nov 30 10:35:47 d0 genunix: [ID 733762 kern.notice] 34
Nov 30 10:35:48 d0 genunix: [ID 733762 kern.notice] 24
Nov 30 10:36:08 d0 last message repeated 20 times
Nov 30 10:36:09 d0 genunix: [ID 622722 kern.notice] done (not all i/o completed)
Nov 30 10:37:30 d0 genunix: [ID 540533 kern.notice] ^MSunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_118844-20 64-bit
Nov 30 10:37:30 d0 genunix: [ID 943906 kern.notice] Copyright 1983-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
At some stage there are problems with creation of a new state...
I remember some time ago (Solaris 2.8) there where problems like that with ipfilter, but now ipfilter included in Solaris distribution, hardware tested and so on...
New reincarnation of a problem?
Somebody has similar problems with the software x86 Solaris 10?
Thanks, Roman Gnatenko (rvg at co.ru)

Hi. I've never seen anything like this, and it seems to be something which
the JDBC module is going to be an innocent victim of, rather than a
contributor to... Your best course is to open an official support case.
Joe

Backup problem with LMS 3.0 on Solaris

Hi All,
I'm encountering problems with LMS 3.0 when I try to do a backup. After you hit OK on the window that says "Do you want to backup now?", an error would pop up saying: "Enter a new directory name or ask the system administrator of the Ciscoworks Common Services server to make the directory accessible to user casuser", thus I cannot proceed with the backup process. When I do backup, my login privilege is admin. Even tried to do backup on the same partition as my CSCOpx directory but to no avail.
Appreciate your help on this guys. Our LMS 3.0 runs on Solaris platform. Thanks in advance.

Hi Joe,
Thanks for your prompt response. By the way, what is a casuser? Is he also one of the user that can be found on the Local User Setup on Common Services? The scenario here is that, I am not the one who installed the Ciscoworks LMS 3.0 on the client side, so I am not aware on how they did the installation procedure for the application. I remember assigning casuser password during installation on our other clients that has LMS 3.0.
Will the write access on the backup directory for the casuser be done by the Solaris root administrator?
Thanks for your help.

Multi-Owner Diskset problem with SC3.1U4 & Solaris 10

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for