Multi User Mode Won't run Program

I have Route 66 USA running with the windows gps device which came with the program. Originally I installed Route 66 as an administrator. Since then I have changed my account to a standard user and added an administrator account and a third user account.
Route 66 only works with my original user account or any user I setup with administration status. It will not allow the program to run from a second standard user. Why? I don't need admininstration account to run it using the original user account.
Apple Care will not help me figure out how to change the permissions and ownership to allow this second user to run the program because its 3rd party software even though I asked for help figuring out what the ownership/permissions stuff is all about or what they mean.

1. It is possible to do this in the Finder, but will
likely be more reliable and convenient to do it in
the Terminal.
2. You can run that command from any admin account on
the machine, and it will have the same effect from
any admin account.
3. Not for a third-party application, as the receipt
for that application inside /Library/Receipts isn't
consulted if it exists at all.
4. See here and <A
HREF=http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/R
eference/ManPages/man1/chmod.1.html>here for
information.
(16550)
Perfect! Thanks big time! Printing it out and will check out the info!

Similar Messages

4.3 Multi User Mode; Where?

According to Samsungs Official Site and the 4.3 Upgrade it talks about having us have "Multi User Mode" Which means you can pass your smartphone to someone else, they can log in and have access to all their stuff (emails Im thinking)
But I cant seem to find it on my cell phone. How bout you?
So then a Samsung Agent said it wasnt currently available on my device and gave me a list of what did change.
It said "Updated Interface: Home/Apps/Lock/Notification Panel" So I asked....what changed on Lock screen...perhaps the Multi User ability?
She said "No, a signature lock screen" I said "Hmmm" Yeah you have the ability to use your signature to lock unlock your device.
I said ....."I didnt get that update"
So I'm here asking the rest of you...how do I access the Multi Users function...where is it and also did anyone else get a "signature" option for lock screen?
Thanks

Sorry it took so long to respond; been busy.
Okay well what I viewed was off of Samsung's website so I know Verizon has nothing to do with it; just kinda sucks that its advertised and I'm mis-informed by the creator of my phone LOL
Providing Verizon will let me provide a link to a 3rd party site heres the link I got the info off of:
http://m.samsung.com/us/article/premium-suite-update-for-galaxy-devices?marsLinkCategory=mphone:mphone&MKM_RID=0130085086&MKM_MID=4289732&CID=eml-mb-cp-1013-499
Note at the very top of that page (link I provided) it says this: Our latest software update opens up a new world for your Galaxy S® 4, Galaxy Note® II and Galaxy S® III with Android 4.3, Galaxy Gear compatibility and an emphasis on security and privacy (no mention of the word Tablet, unless one of those words is implied?....myself I own a "Galaxy Note 10.1" tablet)

Can't boot in to multi user mode

After a reboot, Arch went blank before launching gdm - it wouldn't respond to C-A-Backspace or anything. So I booted in to single user mode, and changed the runlevel to 3 and rebooted. When I try to log in from the CLI, the computer hangs, and never prompts for a password. Does anyone know what might cause this, and how it can be fixed? Until then it fixed, I'm stuck with my damn iBook running YDL
Thanks!

You could lave the machine off for a while, start it, let it freeze, shutdown, wait some more, then post here everything with a relavent timestamp from the logs. Assuming you can shutdown without messing up your filesystem that is - if you have to press the power button to turn off I wouldn't do too much of that.
Also, what did you do before the reboot? any upgrades?
Jack
PS: now going home, won't be back till tomorrow

Running Designer in multi-user mode on Citrix

We have multiple developers accessing DS 3.1 Designer via Citrix. Each time a developer logs in and launches Designer, they see the previous developers db log in information. We have since implemented the RunDSDesignerMU.bat script, but we're still having the same issue. Any ideas?

I think this is not possible as debugger attaches to the java process over a
specific port specified during wls startup.
Now if a debugger session is already active (read using the port) how can
others attach to the same port
Wondering why your are encountering this limitation. Ideally debugging is
done on development environments where each developer has a dedicated instance
to play with. Even in the event you go for a single installation, you could
create multiple server instance, one for each developer
Thoughts
anand
In article <3f0c3b90$[email protected]>, Dan wrote:
>
The problem we are facing is that starting WebLogic in the debug mode only allows
a single user to debug at a time. It does not allow multiple users to remotely
debug. Also, when a user is debugging, the WebLogic instance cannot be used by
other users - even for normal execution.
Supporting Information:
1. We have installed BEA WebLogic 7.0 on a Dual Xeon Processor machine with 1GB
RAM and deployed our J2EE application on this server.
2. The development is being done using JBuilder 8.0 Enterprise edition. All team
members have JBuilder 8.0 installed on their local workstations.
3. When we need to debug the application, we have to start the WebLogic server
using "StartRemoteWebLogic". This allows us to remotely debug the application
from our local workstations.

[Solved] Apps in /home/user/bin won't run

As per subject.
To run such command I have to give full path of /home/user/bin/app because simple app is not being recognized.
Last edited by Lockheed (2011-05-02 12:18:53)

Lockheed wrote:
Well, obviously "user" in the path is just replacement of my username, lets say the real location of my bins is /home/smith009/bin
I am not really sure what either of us suggested to do. Can you rephrase?
kazuo suggested you run
export PATH="/home/user/bin:$PATH"
and try again. Of course you need to change to the real path, e.g. /home/smith009/bin.
Lockheed suggested to change it to
export PATH="$PATH:/home/user/bin"

Multi-load flash won't run in browser

I have a flash file that plays an intro and presents a table of contents. Each "chapter" loads a different movie into the movie container. Works great by itself which you can see here:
http://www.lionprecision.com/tech-library/technotes/tech-flash/cve/c-v-e-player.swf
However, when I place the main swf (c-v-e-player.swf) in a web page using Dreamweaver, I only get the intro and TOC, but the chapters won't play, as you can see here:
http://www.lionprecision.com/tech-library/technotes/tech-flash/f-article-0011-cve.html
Can anyone provide insight into this? Perhaps I should post on Flash Forum instead? Think I'll do that too.
TIA,
Mark

Hi Mark,
I would assume this has to do with the paths you are using to load the external SWF and/or FLV files. Because the SWF exists in the "cve" folder and the HTML page exists one level higher, there may be an issue with not finding the appropriate content. If you create an HTML page in the "cve" folder and use DW to place the SWF in that page does it work? If so, then you'll have to go back to the Flash authoring environment to make sure the paths to load the external SWF/FLV content will work.
Hope that helps.
Thanks,
Josh Margulis
Adobe Senior Solutions Engineer

Performance degradation in Data Integrator Designer with Multi-user mode

Post Author: ccastrillon
CA Forum: Data Integration
We are developing an information system based on a DataMart populated with data using ETL processes built with Data Integrator. We are three people developing and when we work at the same time we begin to have problem of performance with Designer. Designer seems freeze sometimes and development process becomes painful.
Where is the problem? accessing repository? Is any known bug?
Job Server? but it happens even when we don't launch any job. Only building ETL processes manipulating objects (Dataflows, workflows,...etc).
We would appreciate any help. Thanks in advance.
Carlos Castrilló

Post Author: bhofmans
CA Forum: Data Integration
What do you mean with 'working at the same time' ? You need 3 different repositories if you want to work with 3 developers, so there should be no impact at all when working simultaniously...
-Ben.

Multi user mode in windows & itunes library sync

I moved my itunes music from my personal folder to shared documents folder & can not sync my ipod anymore. All my music is on my ipod as well as on the shared folder itunes library but itunes now opens with no music & I can not sync automatically.
What should I do?

Hi, olivier.
This article in the Apple Knowledge Base describes the steps you should have taken in changing the location of your iTunes Music folder.
Is it possible for you to backtrack the steps you took and then follow those instructions?

10.6.2 SMB - QB 2005 PC won't run in Multi User

Hi there,
This is a pretty specific issue but i'll throw this out anyway.
I setup a brand new 10.6.2 server alongside our old 10.4.11 server.
I cloned the contents of the "shared data" from the old box to the new one.
We have had the SMB service running for Quickbooks 2005 running on 2 PCs (Xp Pro clients), shared via QB's "Multi User" mode.
The new server's SMB share, identical in permissions etc to the old one, will not allow QB to open the file in Multi User mode. It gives an error to the effect of "Your company file has been damaged". My attempts to repair the QB file had no effect.
If I copy the same company file back onto our old Tiger Server's SMB share, it works fine. I assume this is simply a difference in Samba versions, but I have no idea how to troubleshoot it.
I obviously have a workaround for now, but it's less than ideal to have an entire Xserve on to share a Quickbooks file.
Any insight would be appreciated.
~p

Bumped into this article; I'll post back after i give it a shot.
http://edoceo.com/liber/network-samba-quickbooks
The gist of it:
"the directories that will be the root of the share must be owned by the group that the users who will access are in and they must be able to write"

Problem with mode switching/Volume Panel in multi-user environment?

As above - using Windows 7 64-bit with an X-Fi Titanium Fatalty card.
All works well as long as I'm the only person logged in, but if my wife logs into the computer (using Windows 7's built-in multi-user mode...'fast user switching', which is enabled by default), and then I log back in...well, the volume panel app doesn't seem to work. In fact, even using the control panel app, I can't regain control of the soundcard enough to switch modes.
Logging her off doesn't resolve the issue, so it seems like something about her logging on (another user logging in, two volpanlu.exe running, something) is causing my instance to go haywire. [FWIW, I'm a 'standard' user on the PC, and her login is a 'limited' user]
Note that 'killing' the task volpanlu.exe in task managed, then going to the Windows services control panel and stopping and re-starting the 'Windows Audio' service, and finally re-launching volpanlu.exe from the start menu DOES always work to resolve the problem (regardless of if she's logged in or not...this always fixes it).
Still, that's a kinda annoyingly large set of steps to always have to go through whenever I want to change audio mode after she's logged in.
Is there any way to fix this? Any setting I could be missing to optimize the X-Fi control panel for multi-user environments? Any of the X-Fi mod dri've packs handle fast user switching better? Any other ideas?

GA little bit more tinkering around this, and I have some more information:
- Once I "seize control" (the kill of volpanlu, restart 'Windows Audio' service, re-launch volpanlu), if my wife logs back in, now *she* can't change the audio mode

Latest Patch cluster (Feb 11, 2010) unable to run in Single user mode.

Hi ,
This is my first post in this forum.
Hope you people will help to resolve the issue.
My issue - I have downloaded the latest patch cluster (Feb 11, 20100) and tried to install it from single user mode.
Nothing happened. I have waited for more than 30 mins, still no progres.
Then I killed the process, and tried to run it in Multi user mode (To verify any issue with extraction or file) -- Its working(and killed the process) !!!
Anyone facing this strange issue ?
Appreciate your help to complete the patching.
Thanks.
sas.

Hi,
If you're encountering issues with a patch cluster bundle your best bet is to contact [email protected] From the description it sounds like there may be a filesystem not mounted in SUM that the cluster is trying to patch.

Multi user catalog and how to make it - use a checked out system

Lots of people want or need a Multi user ability in lightroom here is one way to achieve multi-user catalogs by using a check-in check-out system.
The Catalog would open normally upon a second user opening LR would then ask to switch to multi-user mode.
Once in multi user mode lightroom would lock-out images, collections, or folders by a checked-out for editing system.
By checking-out images, collections, or folders: files would be unavailable to other users until edits are saved, and the images, collections, or folders are checked-in.
This check-in check-out system would need a global check-in feature in case someone forgot to check in an image, collection, or folders (global check-in could be admin level). Word documents, CAD files, etc, use a similar lock-out/read only system for the files. Since, we wouldn't want to bloat the files with programing to lock out the files, this would have to be added to the catalog and managed by the catalog.
My system
Vista Ultimate 32bit SP1
AMD 64X2 duel core 6000+ 3.2Ghz
6GB 666mhz Ram PAE force enabled
NVIDIA Gforce 7600 256MB video card (1.75GB total with system shared ram)
primary hard drive 500GB
Hard drive 2 400GB (system and photoshop paging files and lightroom catalog drive)
Hdrive 3 1TB (primary image storage)
user control turned off
system graphics set to performance
Duel display
LR 2.0
PS extended CS3

Your thread pool is a pool and probably keeps
the thread alive even though the thread has nothing
after a minute toi execute - you'll have to call its
shutdown() methodThanks Oxe...
I googled that (easy when you know what the answer is) and yes the ScheduledThreadPool retains threads for re-use, so you have to check that all threads are done and then shutdown() the scheduler... like this:     while (!future.isDone()) {
          try { Thread.sleep(10); } catch(InterruptedException e) {}
     scheduler.shutdown();
... here is the complete working class:
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledFuture;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.*;
import java.awt.Toolkit;
class BeeperControl {
     private final ScheduledExecutorService scheduler = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(1);
     public void beepForAMinute() {
          final Toolkit tk = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit();
          final Runnable beeper = new Runnable() {
               public void run() {
                    tk.beep();
                    System.out.println("beep");
          final ScheduledFuture<?> future = scheduler.scheduleAtFixedRate(beeper, 250, 250, MILLISECONDS);
          scheduler.schedule(
               new Runnable() {
                    public void run(){
                         future.cancel(true);
               }, 3, SECONDS
          while (!future.isDone()) {
               try { Thread.sleep(10); } catch(InterruptedException e) {}
          scheduler.shutdown();
     public static void main(String[] args)
          BeeperControl bc = new BeeperControl();
          bc.beepForAMinute();
}Thanx again. Keith.

Trying to access Lion server remote using multi-user access, but from a legacy Leopard system

Just purchased a mini server running Lion, and got screen sharing working fine from my legacy system (32-bit so Leopard only). However, I would like to run in multi-user mode, so someone can use the Lion system and another person can access their own account, from the older Leopard system, at the same time. Using multi-user rather than screen sharing. But Leopard does not have the option on the Finder/Share Screen command, the pop-up window to select screen sharing or new virtual session. So, is there a way still to run a new virtual session from a remote client running Leopard? Since the multi-user capability resides on the Lion server, it should be possible, but how, without the pop-up menu?
Message was edited by: Kurt-Syracuse

Hey. I suggest you check out http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9839785#9839785, where there are a couple solutions posted in regard to the error code -36 when connecting to a samba share. Good luck!
Jeremy A.
Tekserve Intern

Single user mode session lost after backgound processes jump in

We have an application running on SQL server. This application restores DB very frequently using Single user mode. Following are the SQLs that are executed to restore the database in single user mode and to get the database back in multi user mode.
alter database [test-db] set single_user with rollback immediate; --This sql is run using test-db
use master;restore database [test-db] from database_snapshot = 'snapshot_test-db';
alter database [test-db] set multi_user;
After switching the test-db to single user mode some 4-5 background processes of Taskmanager jump in for the test-db kicking off the session that application has taken over in single user mode . These background process are deadlocked between them selves.
Please refer to the output of sp_who2 below at link.
http://social.microsoft.com/Forums/getfile/200625
and following is the deadlock XML.
NOTE: SPIDs in deadlock XML may differ from the output of sp_who2 as spids keeps on changing for these processes.
<deadlock-list>
<deadlock victim="process4bbfc78">
<process-list>
<process id="process4bbfc78" taskpriority="0" logused="10000" waitresource="DATABASE: 5 " waittime="705" schedulerid="1" kpid="1648" status="background" spid="22" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="0">
<executionStack/>
<inputbuf>
</inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="process6d44388" taskpriority="0" logused="10000" waitresource="DATABASE: 5 " waittime="419" schedulerid="1" kpid="5796" status="background" spid="30" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="0">
<executionStack/>
<inputbuf>
</inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="process6d44718" taskpriority="0" logused="10000" waitresource="DATABASE: 5 " waittime="109" schedulerid="1" kpid="3908" status="background" spid="16" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="0">
<executionStack/>
<inputbuf>
</inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="process4bbee38" taskpriority="0" logused="10000" waitresource="DATABASE: 5 " waittime="313" schedulerid="1" kpid="2656" status="background" spid="15" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="0">
<executionStack/>
<inputbuf>
</inputbuf>
</process>
</process-list>
<resource-list>
<databaselock subresource="FULL" dbid="5" dbname="unknown" id="lock4671600" mode="S">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process6d44718" mode="S"/>
<owner id="process4bbee38" mode="S"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process4bbfc78" mode="X" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</databaselock>
<databaselock subresource="FULL" dbid="5" dbname="unknown" id="lock4671600" mode="S">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process4bbfc78" mode="S"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process6d44388" mode="X" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</databaselock>
<databaselock subresource="FULL" dbid="5" dbname="unknown" id="lock4671600" mode="S">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process4bbfc78" mode="S"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process6d44718" mode="X" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</databaselock>
<databaselock subresource="FULL" dbid="5" dbname="unknown" id="lock4671600" mode="S">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process4bbfc78" mode="S"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process4bbee38" mode="X" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</databaselock>
</resource-list>
</deadlock>
</deadlock-list>
On searching for this problem I found out that people have faced similar problem but I was unable to find out the root cause and debug steps for this problem. Stopping the SQL server is provided as a solution to kick out these background processes but this
is not a feasible in our case as code to restore DB runs very frequently resulting in this problem at a good frequency.
I also made sure that SQL Server Agent is not running. The SQL services running on server are SQL server, SQL Server Browser and SQL Server VSS Writer.
Any help will be appreciated as this is a blocker problem.
Thanks,

Hi Amrita,
We can open a transaction, make data modifications to generate a lot of transaction log, and then run ALTER DATABASE AppDB SET MULTI_USER in the same transaction. You can also refer to the following document:
Getting out of single user mode:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dfurman/archive/2012/01/20/getting-out-of-single-user-mode.aspx
Allen Li
TechNet Community Support

How to mount USB & CDROM drives from single user mode - Solaris boot disk?

Hi All,
I need to carry out ufsrestore on a single newly replaced system disk (no redundancy / mirroring) from either USB or CDROM drives from the following steps:
( i ) GRUB => e, e, cdrom –s, Enter, b (boot from Solaris 10 x86 media).
( ii ) Choose menu 1 for Install Solaris Interactive Mode to reach single user mode.Below are the commands that I have tried in single user mode without success:
mount –r –F pcfs /dev/dsk/c1t0d0p0 /cdrom (after unmount Solaris CD)
mount: /dev/dsk/c1t0d0p0 is not a DOS filesystem.
svcadm –v enable smserver
svcadm: Pattern ‘smserver’ doesn’t match any instances
svcadm enable autofs
svcadm: Pattern ‘autofs’ doesn’t match any instances
devfsadm
devfsadm: mkdir failed for /dev 0s1ed: Read-only file system
mkdir /mnt
mkdir: Failed to make directory “/mnt”; Read-only file systemPart of the problem is due to the current READ ONLY filesystems which does not allow the creation of mount point such as /mnt.
I have been able to create both / root (/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0) and /export/home (/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0) filesystems with newfs that are awaiting for restore using ufsrestore.
The only option I am left with is to attach a secondary disk to install Solaris 10 on either of them before bring the system to multi-user mode so that service such as volmgt, autofs, volfs are available to access USB & CDROM drives.
Any suggestion on how to resolve this issue?
Many thanks,
Jack

Hi JKGN,
Is the directory a located under the root filesystem. ie /a? Are there any other mount point for say USB drive as well? I am not in a position to try it out right now but will get back
to you soon on whether /a exist or not.
Btw, the last thing I managed to do on this system at the time was added a secondary 1TB internal disk with the intention to restore both / and /export/home data onto this disk while
making use of all the disk device management services such as the following services only available in a fully installed Solaris system (both single & multi-user modes) installed on the
primary disk:
# svcs smserver
STATE          STIME    FMRI
online         Jun_08   svc:/network/rpc/smserver:default
# svcs autofs
STATE          STIME    FMRI
online         Jun_08   svc:/system/filesystem/autofs:default
# devfsadm
# iostat -En
c1t0d0           Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0
Vendor: ATA      Product: SAMSUNG HD321KJ Revision: 0-11 Serial No:
Size: 320.07GB <320072932864 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 41 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0
c0t0d0           Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 5 Transport Errors: 0
Vendor: PHILIPS Product: DVD+-RW DVD8801 Revision: AD21 Serial
Size: 17.54GB <17538875392 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 5 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 10 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0
c2t0d0           Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0
Vendor: JetFlash Product: Transcend 16GB   Revision: 1100 Serial No:
Size: 0.00GB <0 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 7 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0
# rmformat
Looking for devices...
     1. Volmgt Node: /vol/dev/aliases/cdrom0
        Logical Node: /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s2
        Physical Node: /pci@0,0/pci-ide@1f,1/ide@0/sd@0,0
        Connected Device: PHILIPS DVD+-RW DVD8801 AD21
        Device Type: DVD Reader/WriterHowever, I was disappointed that "iostat -En" has not found the secondary disk (1 TB) even though it was available earlier, for Solaris installation as the only disk on the same system.
As a result, I am left with no option but the need to rebuild this system with only a single primary disk while in single user mode. However, the single user mode that I am in is the
one from Solaris installation disk with restrictive (_cannot create folder for mount point or running disk management utilities_) capability such as those services just covered, compared to one from a completed Solaris installation system with full access to all filesystems and utilities / commands in general.
I would very much value your assistance on how to mount both CD & USB in this restrictive limited Read Only OS (assume that it is running from memory) in order to get complete access to
the blank primary disk so that full restore with ufsrestore could take place.
Thanks in advance,
Jack
Edited by: 797805 on 9/06/2012 04:15

Multi User Mode Won't run Program

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for