Multicube characteristic reassignment to different dimension.

Dear All,
We are reorganizing all the characteristics and dimension for our multiproviders. Earlier the assignment was not done as per the logical groupings and now we would like to group logical entities in one dimension. We might also need to create some additional dimensions.
We are also adding some additinal characteristic to the multiprovider from basic cube which were not selected earlier.
Could you please let me know if there is any impact on the queries and its behaviour if we do the dimension reorganization. Also please let me know what impact in general it can have.
Your suggestions will be appreciated.
Regards,
Niraj

Hi Niraj,
There is no impact on the backend as multiprovider is juast a kind of view.
You may need to check the queries on this multiprovider.
sometimes there might be some complex restrictions involving infoprovider in the restriction. so you may need to check the assignment in multiprovider for such restriction.
you may have to check the queries and save them again as the assignment of charechteristics is getting changed.
If there are no such complex restrictions, ewverything will gofine.
Hope this helps,
Sri....

Similar Messages

OBIEE Group By on 2 facts and concatenated columns from different dimensions

Hi
I have a different kind of problem involving 2 fact tables with different dimensional attributes.
Fact 1 has Dim Attributes ( Cust,Facility )
Measure - Gross Amount
Fact2 has Dim attributes (Cust,Facility and Risk Group )
Measure : Exposure Amount
Since we have 2 facts with different dimensions,
to exclude the 'Risk Group' dimension column from the group by for the Fact1,
we set the 'Gross Amount' measure to total level (Risk Group Dimension ) in contents tab.
So the values from both the fact tables appears in the same report correctly.
But in the same report we have another requirement where the rating column from the customer dimension has to be concatenated with the ratings column in the facility dimension.
We have to concatenate customer.rating with the facility.rating and display it in the report.
when we just pull the individual columns from the dimensions into the report it works fine.
But when we try to concatenate the 2 columns and show it in the report,
the concatenated column does not appear in the select or the group by in the SQL Fact2.( Generated by OBIEE )
The other fact1 has the concatenated column in the select as well as the group by clause ( Generated by OBIEE )
As a result the report shows the concatenated values only for the results from the Fact1. But the results from Fact2 does not have the concatenated column values.
The report should look like the below:
Custor.Name,     Customer.Id,     Facility.Name,     Facility.Id,     Customer.Rating/Facility.Rating,     Risk Group,     Gross Amount,     Exposure Amount
===========    =========      ===========     =========   ========================      =========     ===========     ===============
JPMC                123                    GROSS               123               08/10                                                  LNL                    45,000               25,000
CLAIRE               456                    NET                    456               07/10                                                  RNK                    50,000               30,000
Thanks,
Chandra

As suggested you really want to move your none-aggregated fact attributes to a logical dimension (using the same physical table as the logical fact). Map this in the BMM layer as a snowflake, Place a hierarchy on this dimension with (at minimum) Total -> Detail levels, then on the other fact table you want to include in the report, set the content level on your other fact measures to the 'Total' level for your new logical Dim and it will allow them to be present in the same report.

How to Watermark multiple images with different dimensions in Photoshop ?

Is there any way that I can place a watermark on the right bottom of multiple images, no matter what dimension the images are? I have tried using Photoshop Scripts > image processor, but it works only for images of same dimension. I want to put watermark on multiple images of different dimensions. This is the output i got.
For the first image the watermark got placed correctly, but for the second image watermark got distracted. As you can clearly see the dimensions are different. Please suggest me some solution.

Open an image to watermark. We must have this open before we start recording an action or else it will keep opening this image and watermarking it over and over again.
In Photoshop go to Windows >> Actions
At the bottom of the Actions Palette you will see a little folder icon, click on it and create a new folder to hold you action in.
Once you have a folder to hold your action we need to hit the Create New Action button (next to the new folder Icon we just used.)
Give our new action a name and set a function key (if required.)
If the record button is not already depressed which it should be by default, hit it now to start recording our action. (located near the folder icon again but this time to the left)
Now that our action is recording go to File >> Place
When the dialog box comes up navigate to your previously created watermark file.
Hit the Place button
Position the watermark as you would normally have it (default is dead center) and hit enter.
Go to File >> Save as,navigate to where you want your watermarked images to finish up and hit save. DO NOT CHANGE THE FILE NAME if you do when you play the batch it will name all the files it saves the same over-writing each other.
Close the image we just watermarked.
when a save dialog comes up do not save the image.
On the Actions Palette hit stop recording.
Our Action is now recorded.
To process an entire folder of images we go to File >> Automate >> Batch
Select the folder in which your images are currently
Select the folder you wish to save the watermarked copies too.
Hit OK
Photoshop is now watermarking all the Images in the selected folder for you.

Trying to use 2 different Dimension tables and make a hierarchy on some columns which are split into these dimensions .. how do I do that

Trying to use 2 different Dimension tables and make a hierarchy on some columns which are split into these dimensions .. how do I do that

If you need to make a hierarchy in an Attribute view you need to have all relevant fields/columns in the same Dimension table..

Concatenate 2 columns from 2 different dimension tables

Hi,
I have 2 columns one from each dimension table.
Column A from Dimension 1 and Column B from Dimension 2.
In my answers i want the results as "dim1.Col A / Dim2.Col B".
I used the concatenate function and it dint give me the results. Both the columns are Non Numeric columns.
I use 2 fact tables in my analysis and data from both the fact tables are combined in 1 analysis.
There are non confirming dimensions between the 2 facts and hence we used hierarchies and level based measures to overcome the issue of non conforming dimensions between the 2 facts.
Any ideas on how to concatenate the 2 different dimension columns into the report ?
Thanks,
Chandra

never mind, i did it using summary columns, thanks

Different aggregation for different Dimensions

Hello,
is it possible to have different aggregations on different dimensions.
I have following situation:
I have a measure per client and day.
I'm interested in the maximum per month from the daily sums over clients.
In the measure properties I can only choose between Maximum and Sum in general but not per Dimensions.
To clearify what i mean here is some sample data.
* * Client A * Client B *
* 2014-11-28 * 7 * 8 * SUM() = 15
* 2014-11-29 * 6 * 8 * SUM() = 14
* 2014-11-30 * 6 * 10 * SUM() = 16 <-- monthly max
* 2014-12-01 * 7 * 8 * SUM() = 15
* 2014-12-02 * 5 * 12 * SUM() = 17 <-- monthly max
* 2014-12-03 * 6 * 9 * SUM() = 15
This data is stored in my fact table with reference to date and client dimensions.
This example data would have to be reported as:
/* Report on measure
* * Measure *
* 2014-11 * 16 *
* 2014-12 * 16 *
* Report on measure per client
(max per client and month)
* * Client A * Client B *
* 2014-11 * 7 * 8 *
* 2014-12 * 7 * 12 *
Can this be achieved with SSAS? Didn't find any property for that on the measure.
Best Regards,
Thomas

Hi Thomas,
According to your description, you want to calculate different aggregation for different dimensions, right?
Based on your scenario, I tested it on AdventureWorks cube, the query below is for you reference.
with member [Customer].[Country].[USA & Canada] as
Aggregate( { [Customer].[Country].&[United States],
[Customer].[Country].&[Canada]
member [Measures].[MaxAmount]
as
max([Date].[Calendar].currentmember.children,[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount])
select {[Customer].[Country].&[United States],[Customer].[Country].&[Canada],[Customer].[Country].[USA & Canada]} on 0,
[Date].[Calendar].[Month].members on 1
from
[Adventure Works]
where [Measures].[MaxAmount]
Here is similar thread with yours, please see:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/1bd493ef-f957-4fd5-916b-ee60639106c3/calculated-member-different-aggregations-on-different-dimensions?forum=sqlanalysisservices
Regards,
Charlie Liao
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Wny does ACR 7.3 open a .JPG with different dimensions than PS 13.0.1 x64?

I have a .jpg file that opens in Photoshop 13.0.1 x64 as an image with dimensions of 5588 x 4627 pixels. If I set Photoshop to open it in ACR 7.3 it opens with dimensions 4453 x 4418 with the image looking squished horizontally and cropped at the top.
I captured the image on a Nikon D600. I developed the NEF with DxO Optics Pro 8.1.1 and output a TIFF. I opened the TIFF in Photoshop (without using ACR) and did my editing including some transformation to create mirrored wrap for a canvas. There are versions saved as PSDs. I resized the image for output and used PS to create a JPG. That JPG causes the strange (to me) behavior when Photoshop tries to open the file.
I used the same PSD to create multiple JPGs with differing levels of quality (varyiing from 9MB to 27MB). Photoshop exhibits the same behavior on all of them.
If I process the JPG thruough ACR, the resultant image retains the bad dimensions and distortions.
The Adobe "chat" preresentative said this was expected behavior in a 2+ hour chat. He/she said that they were able to replicate the different dimensions on their end with their images.
Does anyone know if this is normal behavior? If so, why?
Has anyone experienced something similar?
Thanks,
Joe
I am running this on Win7 x64 Home Premium with 8 GB RAM. I also have LR 4.3 installed on the computer and previously used it to process the same NEF file.

I sent the JPG to a service for a print on canvas. They reported that the image was not the proper size and shape when they opened it in Photoshop. Unfortunately I have not been able to get them to tell me what pixel size it was, just rough inches (!?!?!). So I started trying things in Photoshop and came up with this strange behavior that might explain the problem at the service.

Batch processing images with different dimensions

Hi all!
I've been trying to do this for a while and I'm stumped, so I'd like to know if it's even possible. I'm trying to fathom out how to create an action which…
Takes a jpg
draws a shape
masks the image
adds another shape
So I can batch process a ton of images.
I managed to do something like what I'm after but the thing I'm having trouble with is that the original images will have different dimensions.
I have attached (via link) an example image which would be the original (start.jpg), one which would be the desired end result (done.jpg) and the .psd
IF there needs to be a step in the middle of the action where I need to intervene and resize the flat image slightly to fit the canvas it'll still save a load of time.
I know that opening and saving will be taken care of using the batch feature and the result only needs to be a jpg.
Any input will be welcomed!
Here are the working files - http://mikeebee.com/dl/action-test.zip
Many thanks

That's an interesting action, but I thought the expected output was different than what this action produces. First, I didn't think image cropping would have been ok (maybe the OP expects this or is ok with cropping). Secondly, I kept getting caught up in how the right edge was going to actually be skewed (as decreasing in size perspectively off into the distance). This action appears to just visually trick the eye (again which may be what the OP wanted or is ok with). Like I said, just that aspect alone is where I kept getting stuck in how this would be possible without some manual manipulation.
If you take this image http://www.shan-dysigns.com/userForums/photoshop/stripes.jpg and perform this action, you will see how the right side doesn't actually get skewed (as I thought was part of the visual effect wanted). Still, this action is quite nice.

Units of different dimensions cannot be converted

i use storage capacity planning but i have an errors when loading resource location 2400, 2500, 2300 like this :
Units of different dimensions cannot be converted
however some other resource location(1000,3800) is still OK
please tell me how to solve this errors.
thanks so much!

It usually happen when there is an unit on the resource different from the one on product master and no conversion factor for
both.
Check this in your data.
Regards,
Michel Bohn

Stored Value from different Dimension

Hi, I am new to Hyperion Essbase and need some help from a kindsoul here.My cube is as follows- Measure - Variable Cost - Fixed Cost- Division - SCN TOTAL - SCN R&D Div Variable Cost and Fixed Cost are Child of Measure and SCNR&D Div is child of SCN TOTAL and SCN TOTAL is Child ofDivision. I use Excel to get data from SCNTOTAL or SCN R&D Div, eg SCNTOTAL SCNR&D DivFixed Cost 34 FixedCost 30Variable Cost 45 VariableCost 40 But now I have a concern. I wish to store data from SCN R&D Div to Variable Cost so I think I need a formula to do this but how? i.e I need to store data from SCN R&D Div (different dimension) to Variable Costso when I use excel to get data from SCN TOTAL, I still able to getSCN R&D Div for Variable Cost. SCNTOTAL Fixed Cost 34 Variable Cost 40 Thank you. 

Hi Hutchia, thanks a lot for your reply. I give you a moredetailed of my cube structure.-Measure - Miscellaneous Cost (+) - Variable Cost (~) - Utilities Cost (+) - Misc Cost-R&D Div(+) - Fixed Cost (~) - Division - SCN TOTAL - SCN R&D Div ("SCN R&D Div 1" + "SCN R&D Div2") - SCN R&D Div 1 - SCN R&D Div 2 Miscellaneous Cost, Variable Cost and Fixed Cost are Childs ofMeasure. Variable Cost and Fixed Cost are newly added. UtilitiesCost and Misc Cost-R&D Div are Childs of Variable Cost In Division dimension, SCN TOTAL is Child of Division and SCNR&D Div is Child of SCN TOTAL. So when my users do a spreadsheet (Lock & Send) method, theywill use this spreadsheet below SCN R&D Div 1 SCN R&D Div 2Miscellaneous Cost 30 20 If user do a spreadsheet display of the Database, it willshow SCN TOTALMiscellaneous Cost 50 or SCN R&D Div Miscellaneous Cost 50SCN R&D Div 1 Miscellaneous Cost 30 SCN R&D Div 2 Miscellaneous Cost 20 So now I need to add in 2 user information, Variable/Fixed Costaccording to my user request. There were some formulas including toget the desired results. Users wants the below report SCN TOTALVariable Cost 100Fixed Cost 50 Problem: In the Variable Cost, Child, Utilities Cost is toget from SCN TOTAL and only Misc Income-R&D Div is to get fromSCN R&D Div which will add up SCN R&D Div 1 and SCN R&DDiv 2 for Miscellaneous Cost ONLY. Sorry to trouble you but I really can't think of a way out.I was thinking of using Calculation Script after loading updata, calculate the value from Miscellaneous Cost which sums up SCNR&D Div1 and SCN R&D Div 2 and pass to Misc Cost-R&DDiv but how should I do that?

LookupCube based on CurrentMember of different dimensions along with date range

Hi,
I want to get a value through LookupCube based on CurrentMember of different dimensions along with a date range. For example, I want to make this happen: LookupCube("TMIClaim","([Measures].[Paid Amount],"+"[Transaction
Date].[Hierarchy].[Day].&[2013-01-01T00:00:00]:[Transaction Date].[Hierarchy].[Day].&[2013-02-01T00:00:00]" +"," + "[Product].[Name].&["+[TMI Product].[Name].CurrentMember.Name+"]" +")")).
It does not work as long as I put the date range.
I cannot use Aggregate either since it does not take multiple dimensions as filter criteria. That means when I use date range for aggregate I cannot use another dimensions as filter.
I am looking for any of the solution which based filter that is combined with a date range and other dimensions.
Thanks,
Mamun

Try using the Sum() function. Something like:
LookupCube("TMIClaim","Sum( ( { "
+"[Transaction Date].[Hierarchy].[Day].&[2013-01-01T00:00:00]:[Transaction Date].[Hierarchy].[Day].&[2013-02-01T00:00:00]
}" +"," + "[Product].[Name].&["+[TMI Product].[Name].CurrentMember.Name+"]"
) , ([Measures].[Paid Amount]," +")
(Check location of parenthesis, but this should point you in the right direction).
This worked for me:
WITH MEMBER MEASURES.LOOKUPCUBEDEMO AS
LOOKUPCUBE("MyCube", "sum({[Date].[YQM].[Day].&[20140330]:[Date].[YQM].[Day].&[20140331]},[Measures].[Row" + " Count])")
SELECT MEASURES.LOOKUPCUBEDEMO ON 0
FROM [MyCube]
Victor Rocca

Matrix with different dimensions for each column

Hi,
I would like to have a matrix with different dimensions (rows) for each
column, for example, I want the first column has 3 rows, the second one
5 rows, the third one 10 rows, and so on.....
With a simple array it is not possible, and then I make an array (for
my columns) of clusters and each cluster has another array (rows for
that column). Is it the best way to do it? Is it correct?
Thanks,
ToNi.

Yes, everything we told you in this old thread is still true!
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

Any way to limit POV selections between different dimension?

Hi,
For Hyperion Planning:
My users continuously ask for to limit POV selections between different dimensions.
For example,
Dimension Entity: West, South, East, North
Dimension StoreType: Mega, Super, Normal
However, the following combinations make sense in current business context.
West - Mega
West - Super
West - Normal
South - Normal
East - Normal
If users select East - Mega, this does not make sense since there is no such combinations in current business context.
Do any one know a way to limit the wrong selection?
Thank you in advance.
Casper H

This link will give you the answer :- Re: Help in Data forms
probably not the answer you want to hear though.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Maintenance Planning with Cycles of Different Dimensions

Hello All,
I am having trouble finding the solution for the following requirement in PLM310 "Maintenance Planning with Cycles of Different Dimensions": I am having trouble creating a maintenance strategy that can handle both time and measurement.
SImple version of the requirement: perform car maintenance every three months OR 3000 miles, whichever comes first.
I can see where SAP can handle multiple counters, but where I can mix time and performance measurements.
Thank you all for your help in advance.
Alex

Hi,
You can achive this in two ways.
1. If you have strategy only as you mentioned 3Months or 3000 miles then you can use T code IP43 Multiple counterplan.
2. Is you create cycle sets in IP11Z tcode and use them as like strategy. In this typr you can maintain different UOM.
Regards,
N.Nagaraju

Quantity Conversion warnining: different dimensions, no calculations

Hello BI experts,
I have defined a quanity conversion type to convert any weight units to Kgs based on T006 table.
source is from data record. target is fixed to KG.
my record contain data in KG and GM ( gram )
in the output KG records are displayed correct. But the gram records are displayed as 0.000
with a warning message: Quantity unit of measures have different dimensions --> no calculations.
Please advice.
Regards,
BWer

Very trivial.. Was using units from different dimensions
Message was edited by:
BWer

Multicube characteristic reassignment to different dimension.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for