Multimaster replication error
Hi,
Well I am a newbie to multimaster replication. I tried to replication few tables and indexes of hr schema to other database but I am receiving the following errors:
ID REQUEST ERRNUM MESSAGE
43 GENERATE_INTERNAL_PKG_SUPPORT -23308 ORA-23308: object HR.EMPLOYEES does not exist or is inv
121 GENERATE_INTERNAL_PKG_SUPPORT -23308 ORA-23308: object HR.DEPARTMENTS does not exist
41 GENERATE_INTERNAL_PKG_SUPPORT -23308 ORA-23308: object HR.DEPARTMENTS does not exist or is i
141 GENERATE_INTERNAL_PKG_SUPPORT -23308 ORA-23308: object HR.DEPARTMENTS does not exist
161 GENERATE_INTERNAL_PKG_SUPPORT -23308 ORA-23308: object HR.EMPLOYEES does not exist or
21 CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT -942 ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
22 CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT -942 ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
123 GENERATE_INTERNAL_PKG_SUPPORT -23308 ORA-23308: object HR.EMPLOYEES does not exist or
24 CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT -942 ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
25 CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT -942 ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
26 CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT -942 ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
ID REQUEST ERRNUM MESSAGE
27 CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT -942 ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
28 CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT -942 ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
29 CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT -942 ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
30 CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT -942 ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
31 CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT -942 ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
47 GENERATE_INTERNAL_PKG_SUPPORT -23308 ORA-23308: object HR.JOB_HISTORY does not exist or is i
127 GENERATE_INTERNAL_PKG_SUPPORT -23308 ORA-23308: object HR.JOB_HISTORY does not exist
Kindly, help me regarding this issue.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Kind Regards,
Adnan Hamdus Salam
You will see "replica busy" errors from time to time. The replication protocol is "one at a time" - if a consumer has more than 1 supplier, only 1 supplier may update the consumer at a time - the other suppliers get a busy signal during the update. Note that updates to 1 supplier may be sent to another supplier and then to the consumer if the first supplier gets a busy signal, so all of your updates should get through pretty quickly.
The most important thing is - do your updates get through to all consumers? Do they get through quickly?
Similar Messages
-
Multimaster Replication problem
Hello,
I've configured a multimaster replication environment with two master sites and a master group whith both of them and asynchronous replication. My problem is that in the master def the master group appeared stopped and I don´t know how activate it, and far over, the administrative requests in my replicated databases aren't executed by themselves, in the masterdef I can't depure them but I've to do it explicitily and in the other master site there is no way to get this requests dissapear.
The main problem is that in the secondary master site the replication status is always quiesced whereas in the masterdef the status is normal if there is no objects in the master group and quiesced when I add some objects even though I generate the replication support for all the new objects.
Any help would be very useful because I'm beginning with replication and I've no found any information in the 2 manuals of Oracle about this topic.
Thanks in advance.
Mabelyou can find reason from dba_repcatlog view. I will suggest that you must recreate whole environment and then create your replication freshly. remeber that you replicated table must have primary key coulmn or you have configured suitable conflict resolution method for these tables. Moreover after generating replication support for the objects check dba_repcatlog view. this view should be empty and there is no error located in this view. if there is any error see message from this view and solve it and regenerate you replication support for the object and again check. when you complete all error then resume your replication activity.
-
Customer Master replication error from R/3 to CRM
Experts,
I am trying to replicate Customer Master from R/3 to CRM.
All the settings have been done. Nothing shows up in Queues. However, Bdoc hangs in "Received" state.
When I try to reprocess the Bdoc, I get a prog dump of type DBIF_RSQL_INTERNAL_ERROR in below function module: CRM_BUPA_FRG0020_SAVE_TABS
at INSERT crmm_but_set0020 FROM TABLE it_set0020_insert[]
This data corresponds to Shipping data in Customer Master.
Can you please help? I saw a similar thread in the forum where there was a suggestion about R/3 plug in update. How can I do that?
Thanks in advance,
JDPls see Customer Master replication error
Closed. -
Replication error BP from CRM to R/3 - "Fill in all required entry Fields"
Dear Folks
I have maintained all steps mentioned in building block - C03. I have maintained separate account group approach. Made sure that number ranges are in sync in both the systems. Particularly in PIDE, mapping classification Consumer-Org 'A' to 'ZZ01' (Copy of 0001).
I changed all required entry to optional entry in my 'ZZ01' field status using OVT0.
But when i replicate using R3AS, i get an error 'Fill in all required entry Fields" - Error in receiving system (i.e R/3).
I tried manually creating customer in R/3 with the account group ZZ01. Surprisingly it does not allows me to save unless i give the reconcillation account entry, even though it is not a required field.
Please let me know for further details and Please help me to resolve this error. I am in real urgency.
Thanks
Keerthi
Chicago IL
507 401 1030Hi Karunakaran
Your reply answered my question of creating customer with no 'recon' a/c required entry. Thanks awarded 2 points.
My replication error is still hanging around. I found that It has no bearing on the 'Reconcillation A/c' required entry.
Some other field is still restricting my BP Role- Consumer:Organization to replicate. The error still showing as "required fields are not entered in R/3", even after suppressing "Reconcillation Account".
I think my reference customer master i created in R/3 using VD07 is not assigned in case of the account group Consumer:Organization.
But i don't know how to verify my doubts and get rid of this error.
Please help, in great urgency. -
I have been getting a pattern of errors on my DC. I have two pair of eyes on these errors, but everything seems to running ok. The only issue we've had is our workstations were putting out the "Trust domain relationship failed..." error. We were
able fix this issue by removing those machines from the domain, changing the names, and then adding them back. My only concern is that the errors below were the cause of that, and that the issue may return unless this is resolved. I've checked all of my services
and DNS's settings. IPv6 is on. There haven't been any changes to the server in sometime. Which is the baffling part. Any insight on this would be very helpful. I apologize in advance for not being well versed in this area... AD Replication is not my strongest
point.
Error 1
Log Name: Directory Service
Source: Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService
Date: 1/15/2015 9:16:53 AM
Event ID: 2092
Task Category: Replication
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: ANONYMOUS LOGON
Computer: LAHDC1.LAH
Description:
This server is the owner of the following FSMO role, but does not consider it valid. For the partition which contains the FSMO, this server has not replicated successfully with any of its partners since this server has been restarted. Replication errors are
preventing validation of this role.
Operations which require contacting a FSMO operation master will fail until this condition is corrected.
FSMO Role: CN=RID Manager$,CN=System,DC=LAH
User Action:
1. Initial synchronization is the first early replications done by a system as it is starting. A failure to initially synchronize may explain why a FSMO role cannot be validated. This process is explained in KB article 305476.
2. This server has one or more replication partners, and replication is failing for all of these partners. Use the command repadmin /showrepl to display the replication errors. Correct the error in question. For example there maybe problems with IP connectivity,
DNS name resolution, or security authentication that are preventing successful replication.
3. In the rare event that all replication partners being down is an expected occurance, perhaps because of maintenance or a disaster recovery, you can force the role to be validated. This can be done by using NTDSUTIL.EXE to seize the role to the same server.
This may be done using the steps provided in KB articles 255504 and 324801 on http://support.microsoft.com.
The following operations may be impacted:
Schema: You will no longer be able to modify the schema for this forest.
Domain Naming: You will no longer be able to add or remove domains from this forest.
PDC: You will no longer be able to perform primary domain controller operations, such as Group Policy updates and password resets for non-Active Directory Domain Services accounts.
RID: You will not be able to allocation new security identifiers for new user accounts, computer accounts or security groups.
Infrastructure: Cross-domain name references, such as universal group memberships, will not be updated properly if their target object is moved or renamed.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService" Guid="{0e8478c5-3605-4e8c-8497-1e730c959516}" EventSourceName="NTDS General" />
<EventID Qualifiers="32768">2092</EventID>
<Version>0</Version>
<Level>3</Level>
<Task>5</Task>
<Opcode>0</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x8080000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2015-01-15T15:16:53.716341400Z" />
<EventRecordID>19509</EventRecordID>
<Correlation />
<Execution ProcessID="492" ThreadID="1088" />
<Channel>Directory Service</Channel>
<Computer>LAHDC1.LAH</Computer>
<Security UserID="S-1-5-7" />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>CN=RID Manager$,CN=System,DC=LAH</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
Error 2
Log Name: Directory Service
Source: Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService
Date: 1/15/2015 9:16:33 AM
Event ID: 2887
Task Category: LDAP Interface
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: ANONYMOUS LOGON
Computer: LAHDC1.LAH
Description:
During the previous 24 hour period, some clients attempted to perform LDAP binds that were either:
(1) A SASL (Negotiate, Kerberos, NTLM, or Digest) LDAP bind that did not request signing (integrity validation), or
(2) A LDAP simple bind that was performed on a cleartext (non-SSL/TLS-encrypted) connection
This directory server is not currently configured to reject such binds. The security of this directory server can be significantly enhanced by configuring the server to reject such binds. For more details and information on how to make this configuration
change to the server, please see http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=87923.
Summary information on the number of these binds received within the past 24 hours is below.
You can enable additional logging to log an event each time a client makes such a bind, including information on which client made the bind. To do so, please raise the setting for the "LDAP Interface Events" event logging category to level 2
or higher.
Number of simple binds performed without SSL/TLS: 0
Number of Negotiate/Kerberos/NTLM/Digest binds performed without signing: 994
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService" Guid="{0e8478c5-3605-4e8c-8497-1e730c959516}" EventSourceName="NTDS General" />
<EventID Qualifiers="32768">2887</EventID>
<Version>0</Version>
<Level>3</Level>
<Task>16</Task>
<Opcode>0</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x8080000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2015-01-15T15:16:33.350305000Z" />
<EventRecordID>19508</EventRecordID>
<Correlation />
<Execution ProcessID="492" ThreadID="692" />
<Channel>Directory Service</Channel>
<Computer>LAHDC1.LAH</Computer>
<Security UserID="S-1-5-7" />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>0</Data>
<Data>994</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
DCDIAG Results
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\Administrator.LAH>dcdiag.exe
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Trying to find home server...
Home Server = LAHDC1
* Identified AD Forest.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\LAHDC1
Starting test: Connectivity
......................... LAHDC1 passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\LAHDC1
Starting test: Advertising
......................... LAHDC1 passed test Advertising
Starting test: FrsEvent
......................... LAHDC1 passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
......................... LAHDC1 passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
......................... LAHDC1 passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: KccEvent
A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x8000082C
Time Generated: 01/15/2015 08:47:34
Event String:
A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x8000082C
Time Generated: 01/15/2015 08:47:53
Event String:
......................... LAHDC1 passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
......................... LAHDC1 passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
......................... LAHDC1 passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
access rights for the naming context:
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=LAH
Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
access rights for the naming context:
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=LAH
......................... LAHDC1 failed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
......................... LAHDC1 passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
......................... LAHDC1 passed test ObjectsReplicated
Starting test: Replications
[Replications Check,LAHDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:
From LAHDC02 to LAHDC1
Naming Context: DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=LAH
The replication generated an error (8456):
The source server is currently rejecting replication requests.
The failure occurred at 2015-01-15 08:46:33.
The last success occurred at 2014-10-03 15:52:49.
2494 failures have occurred since the last success.
Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server
options.
[Replications Check,LAHDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:
From LAHDC02 to LAHDC1
Naming Context: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=LAH
The replication generated an error (8456):
The source server is currently rejecting replication requests.
The failure occurred at 2015-01-15 08:46:33.
The last success occurred at 2014-10-03 15:52:49.
2494 failures have occurred since the last success.
Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server
options.
[Replications Check,LAHDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:
From LAHDC02 to LAHDC1
Naming Context: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=LAH
The replication generated an error (8456):
The source server is currently rejecting replication requests.
The failure occurred at 2015-01-15 08:46:33.
The last success occurred at 2014-10-03 15:52:49.
2494 failures have occurred since the last success.
Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server
options.
[Replications Check,LAHDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:
From LAHDC02 to LAHDC1
Naming Context: CN=Configuration,DC=LAH
The replication generated an error (8456):
The source server is currently rejecting replication requests.
The failure occurred at 2015-01-15 08:46:33.
The last success occurred at 2014-10-03 15:52:49.
3994 failures have occurred since the last success.
Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server
options.
[Replications Check,LAHDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:
From LAHDC02 to LAHDC1
Naming Context: DC=LAH
The replication generated an error (8456):
The source server is currently rejecting replication requests.
The failure occurred at 2015-01-15 08:46:33.
The last success occurred at 2014-10-03 16:24:02.
2664 failures have occurred since the last success.
Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server
options.
......................... LAHDC1 failed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
......................... LAHDC1 passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
......................... LAHDC1 passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
......................... LAHDC1 passed test SystemLog
Starting test: VerifyReferences
......................... LAHDC1 passed test VerifyReferences
Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test
CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test
CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Schema
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Configuration
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : LAH
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... LAH passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... LAH passed test CrossRefValidation
Running enterprise tests on : LAH
Starting test: LocatorCheck
......................... LAH passed test LocatorCheck
Starting test: Intersite
......................... LAH passed test Intersite
C:\Users\Administrator.LAH>I see the following errors:
"The source server is currently rejecting replication requests."
"Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server options."
I would recommend starting with this MS KB which describes your problem: https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2023007?wa=wsignin1.0
Also, I would recommend that you follow the recommendations I shared in this Wiki: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18513.active-directory-replication-issues-basic-troubleshooting-steps-single-ad-domain-in-a-single-ad-forest.aspx
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Ahmed MALEK
My Website Link
My Linkedin Profile
My MVP Profile -
Replication Error with Vendor Master Records
Hello,
We are trying to replicate vendor master records from R/3 to SRM via BBPGETVD. When we go to SLG1, there is an error stating Business Partner XXXX: Invalid Value 0003 for field Authorization Group.
Currently, the AP dept. maintains the field Authorization Group in the Vendor Master Record 'Control' screen with a fixed value of 0003 (LFA1-BEGRU). When the replication occurs, SRM complains that this field value does not exist in a SRM customizing table or is a fixed value.
Do we need to implement the BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP BAdI to pass this value as a fixed value to replicate vendors?
-regards
Shaz KhanI'm planning to implement bbp_transdata_prep. Wondering if either one of you can help. I've also opened another thread with my specific questions.
Replication Error with Vendor Master Records -
Comparision between Multimaster replication and data guard
Hi,
I have some questions regarding Multimaster Replication and Data Guard. Like
*1.)* I have a web site having database in oracle 10.2.0 and multimaster replication configured on it. But whenever i need to change the structure of the tables i
need to stop replication. So my web site is unavailable but my first priority is availability. So will it be useful for me to configure data guard.
*2.)* I have configured data guard for testing . My Database is Named as Gard and physical standby database is like stan.
it is working fine.
suppose my main database server get corrupted i have no option to start main database server. Now i left with only standby server how i can start standby server
as database main server.
*3.)* Is there any if main database stop working Standby database start working as main without dba intervention.
Thanks
Umesh
Edited by: Umesh Sharma on Jan 14, 2009 4:17 AMHi Umesh,
first of all you should be aware that Dataguard and Replication are two completely different things.
While the database where you replicate to is always up and open in read write mode, a physical standby can either be recovering or open in read only mode.
1.) I think from what you are telling you probably should consider using dataguard with a logical standby database, but be aware that there will be some limitations regarding datatypes.
2.) you can do a failover or a switchover, depending on your database version switchback may not be possible
3.) have a look at dataguard broker, you can use it to automate the failover
Best regards,
PP -
Replication Error between DC and PDC after a reboot.
Hi,
We have a very small server environment and having one DC and one ADC. Last week ADC got a sudden restart. After booting it shown one service failed error. Since then the ADC is not replicating with DC. Giving below the diagnosis
results of Dcdiag and FSMO check.
Domain Controller Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\DC
Starting test: Connectivity
......................... DC passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\DC
DNS Tests are running and not hung. Please wait a few minutes...
Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
Running partition tests on : Schema
Running partition tests on : Configuration
Running partition tests on : bannaridc
Running enterprise tests on : bannaridc.com
Starting test: DNS
......................... bannaridc.com passed test DNS
Domain Controller Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
* Verifying that the local machine backupdc, is a DC.
* Connecting to directory service on server backupdc.
* Collecting site info.
* Identifying all servers.
* Identifying all NC cross-refs.
* Found 2 DC(s). Testing 1 of them.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\BACKUPDC
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... BACKUPDC passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\BACKUPDC
Starting test: Replications
* Replications Check
[Replications Check,BACKUPDC] A recent replication attempt failed:
From DC to BACKUPDC
Naming Context: DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
The replication generated an error (1256):
The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
The failure occurred at 2014-05-15 12:29:41.
The last success occurred at 2014-05-12 09:23:27.
76 failures have occurred since the last success.
REPLICATION LATENCY WARNING
ERROR: Expected notification link is missing.
Source DC
Replication of new changes along this path will be delayed.
This problem should self-correct on the next periodic sync.
[Replications Check,BACKUPDC] A recent replication attempt failed:
From DC to BACKUPDC
Naming Context: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
The replication generated an error (1256):
The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
The failure occurred at 2014-05-15 12:29:41.
The last success occurred at 2014-05-12 09:33:40.
76 failures have occurred since the last success.
REPLICATION LATENCY WARNING
ERROR: Expected notification link is missing.
Source DC
Replication of new changes along this path will be delayed.
This problem should self-correct on the next periodic sync.
[Replications Check,BACKUPDC] A recent replication attempt failed:
From DC to BACKUPDC
Naming Context: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
The replication generated an error (5):
Access is denied.
The failure occurred at 2014-05-15 12:29:41.
The last success occurred at 2014-05-12 09:23:26.
76 failures have occurred since the last success.
[Replications Check,BACKUPDC] A recent replication attempt failed:
From DC to BACKUPDC
Naming Context: CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
The replication generated an error (5):
Access is denied.
The failure occurred at 2014-05-15 12:29:41.
The last success occurred at 2014-05-12 09:23:26.
76 failures have occurred since the last success.
REPLICATION LATENCY WARNING
ERROR: Expected notification link is missing.
Source DC
Replication of new changes along this path will be delayed.
This problem should self-correct on the next periodic sync.
[Replications Check,BACKUPDC] A recent replication attempt failed:
From DC to BACKUPDC
Naming Context: DC=bannaridc,DC=com
The replication generated an error (5):
Access is denied.
The failure occurred at 2014-05-15 12:29:42.
The last success occurred at 2014-05-12 09:42:25.
95 failures have occurred since the last success.
REPLICATION LATENCY WARNING
ERROR: Expected notification link is missing.
Source DC
Replication of new changes along this path will be delayed.
This problem should self-correct on the next periodic sync.
* Replication Latency Check
REPLICATION-RECEIVED LATENCY WARNING
BACKUPDC: Current time is 2014-05-15 13:24:11.
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
Last replication recieved from DC at 2014-05-12 09:23:27.
Latency information for 2 entries in the vector were ignored.
2 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
Last replication recieved from DC at 2014-05-12 09:33:40.
Latency information for 2 entries in the vector were ignored.
2 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
Last replication recieved from DC at 2014-05-12 09:23:26.
Latency information for 2 entries in the vector were ignored.
2 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
Last replication recieved from DC at 2014-05-12 09:23:26.
Latency information for 2 entries in the vector were ignored.
2 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=bannaridc,DC=com
Last replication recieved from DC at 2014-05-12 09:42:25.
Latency information for 2 entries in the vector were ignored.
2 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
* Replication Site Latency Check
......................... BACKUPDC passed test Replications
Test omitted by user request: Topology
Test omitted by user request: CutoffServers
Starting test: NCSecDesc
* Security Permissions check for all NC's on DC BACKUPDC.
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
(NDNC,Version 2)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
(NDNC,Version 2)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
(Schema,Version 2)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
(Configuration,Version 2)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=bannaridc,DC=com
(Domain,Version 2)
......................... BACKUPDC passed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
* Network Logons Privileges Check
Verified share \\BACKUPDC\netlogon
Verified share \\BACKUPDC\sysvol
......................... BACKUPDC passed test NetLogons
Starting test: Advertising
The DC BACKUPDC is advertising itself as a DC and having a DS.
The DC BACKUPDC is advertising as an LDAP server
The DC BACKUPDC is advertising as having a writeable directory
The DC BACKUPDC is advertising as a Key Distribution Center
Warning: BACKUPDC is not advertising as a time server.
......................... BACKUPDC failed test Advertising
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Role Schema Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
Role Domain Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
Role PDC Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
Role Rid Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
Role Infrastructure Update Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
......................... BACKUPDC passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: RidManager
* Available RID Pool for the Domain is 3107 to 1073741823
* DC.bannaridc.com is the RID Master
* DsBind with RID Master was successful
* rIDAllocationPool is 2607 to 3106
* rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 2607 to 3106
* rIDNextRID: 2771
......................... BACKUPDC passed test RidManager
Starting test: MachineAccount
Checking machine account for DC BACKUPDC on DC BACKUPDC.
* SPN found :LDAP/backupdc.bannaridc.com/bannaridc.com
* SPN found :LDAP/backupdc.bannaridc.com
* SPN found :LDAP/BACKUPDC
* SPN found :LDAP/backupdc.bannaridc.com/BANNARIDC
* SPN found :LDAP/bcbf105f-e755-4c24-b846-01d447834480._msdcs.bannaridc.com
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/bcbf105f-e755-4c24-b846-01d447834480/bannaridc.com
* SPN found :HOST/backupdc.bannaridc.com/bannaridc.com
* SPN found :HOST/backupdc.bannaridc.com
* SPN found :HOST/BACKUPDC
* SPN found :HOST/backupdc.bannaridc.com/BANNARIDC
* SPN found :GC/backupdc.bannaridc.com/bannaridc.com
......................... BACKUPDC passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: Services
* Checking Service: Dnscache
* Checking Service: NtFrs
* Checking Service: IsmServ
* Checking Service: kdc
* Checking Service: SamSs
* Checking Service: LanmanServer
* Checking Service: LanmanWorkstation
* Checking Service: RpcSs
* Checking Service: w32time
* Checking Service: NETLOGON
......................... BACKUPDC passed test Services
Test omitted by user request: OutboundSecureChannels
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
BACKUPDC is in domain DC=bannaridc,DC=com
Checking for CN=BACKUPDC,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=bannaridc,DC=com in domain DC=bannaridc,DC=com on 1 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
Checking for CN=NTDS Settings,CN=BACKUPDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com in domain CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com on 1 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
......................... BACKUPDC passed test ObjectsReplicated
Starting test: frssysvol
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... BACKUPDC passed test frssysvol
Starting test: frsevent
* The File Replication Service Event log test
......................... BACKUPDC passed test frsevent
Starting test: kccevent
* The KCC Event log test
Found no KCC errors in Directory Service Event log in the last 15 minutes.
......................... BACKUPDC passed test kccevent
Starting test: systemlog
* The System Event log test
An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC25A001D
Time Generated: 05/15/2014 12:30:20
(Event String could not be retrieved)
An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC25A001D
Time Generated: 05/15/2014 12:49:04
(Event String could not be retrieved)
An Error Event occured. EventID: 0x40000004
Time Generated: 05/15/2014 12:53:20
Event String: The kerberos client received a
KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server
host/backupdc.bannaridc.com. The target name
used was
LDAP/bcbf105f-e755-4c24-b846-01d447834480._msdcs.bannaridc.com.
This indicates that the password used to encrypt
the kerberos service ticket is different than
that on the target server. Commonly, this is due
to identically named machine accounts in the
target realm (BANNARIDC.COM), and the client
realm. Please contact your system
administrator.
An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC25A001D
Time Generated: 05/15/2014 13:12:19
(Event String could not be retrieved)
......................... BACKUPDC failed test systemlog
Test omitted by user request: VerifyReplicas
Starting test: VerifyReferences
The system object reference (serverReference)
CN=BACKUPDC,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=bannaridc,DC=com and backlink on
CN=BACKUPDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
are correct.
The system object reference (frsComputerReferenceBL)
CN=BACKUPDC,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
and backlink on CN=BACKUPDC,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
are correct.
The system object reference (serverReferenceBL)
CN=BACKUPDC,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
and backlink on
CN=NTDS Settings,CN=BACKUPDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=bannaridc,DC=com
are correct.
......................... BACKUPDC passed test VerifyReferences
Test omitted by user request: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Test omitted by user request: CheckSecurityError
Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Running partition tests on : Schema
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom
Running partition tests on : Configuration
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom
Running partition tests on : bannaridc
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... bannaridc passed test CrossRefValidation
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... bannaridc passed test CheckSDRefDom
Running enterprise tests on : bannaridc.com
Starting test: Intersite
Skipping site Default-First-Site-Name, this site is outside the scope
provided by the command line arguments provided.
......................... bannaridc.com passed test Intersite
Starting test: FsmoCheck
GC Name: \\DC.bannaridc.com
Locator Flags: 0xe00003fd
PDC Name: \\DC.bannaridc.com
Locator Flags: 0xe00003fd
Time Server Name: \\DC.bannaridc.com
Locator Flags: 0xe00003fd
Preferred Time Server Name: \\DC.bannaridc.com
Locator Flags: 0xe00003fd
KDC Name: \\backupdc.bannaridc.com
Locator Flags: 0xe00001b8
......................... bannaridc.com passed test FsmoCheck
Test omitted by user request: DNS
Test omitted by user request: DNS
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Regards,
surenHi suren,
Error 1256 is logged as the replication status per partition as a result of the destination DC cancelling the sync request from the source DC due to a connectivity failure previously encountered.
Please refer to the articles below to troubleshoot the issue:
Troubleshooting AD Replication error 1256: The remote system is not available.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2200187
Troubleshooting AD Replication error 5: Access is denied
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2002013
Regards,
Mandy
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place. -
Load Balancing and Asynchronous Multimaster Replication
We are planning a new project with 2 server lines for load balancing reasons. We also plan to use sessions being valid for 30 minutes. Each of the 2 server lines has its own Oracle database (identical tables) for the transactions. Within one session the load balancing sends the user always to the same server line.
Independant transactions are executed on both server lines.
Is Asynchronous Multimaster Replication the adequate solution to have the two databases synchronized, what has to be considered (network, memory, cpu) or what else can (has to) be used ?
We want to avoid a RAC solution because of the high costs.The two options that come to mind here are asynchronous multimaster replication and Oracle Streams.
- What version of the Oracle database will you be using?
- What sort of transaction volume do you anticipate? How much redo generation?
- What sort of connection exists between the two machines?
- Is there an upper limit on the time that can be taken to replicate a transaction from one machine to the other?
Justin
Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC -
Synchronous multimaster replication Backup strategy using RMAN
Hi all,
I am using synchronous multimaster replication. my question is backup strategy has to perofirm in all the master site or only in any of 1 mastersite? what all problems will encounter in RMAn backup in my scenario please help me out with your suggestion
nagaraj.K
[email protected]You ask: "I want to configure backup strategy using RMAN. any one can help me that"
And the answer is clearly no we can not.
An RMAN backup strategy depends on your SLA (Service Level Agreement) with your customers that you didn't post. What is your down-time window? What is your skill set?
You ask: "How to configure for RMAN Incremental backup?"
Read the docs at http://tahiti.oracle.com for your version (which you didn't mention).
You ask: "What will be backup space and there size ?"
We have no idea. Are you going to create an image copy or a backup set? Read the docs and learn the difference. Are you going to turn on compression? Are you going to back up only changed blocks? We don't know.
You ask: "how to manage growing online archiving files?"
Again we can't help you without knowing your SLA. How many MG/GB are they? What period of time do you need to retain them to meet your SLA? When you figure this out back up to tape those you don't need to keep on the server.
You ask: "how to manage growing data and there disk space?"
This is one we can answer: BUY MORE DISK! That was easy.
You ask: "How we can give good performance our CPU and memory?"
Do you really expect that we can with zero knowledge of your environment, your version, your application, etc. distill into a few short paragraphs the collective wisdom of Cary Millsap, Jonathan Lewis, and the rest of the Oak Table Network membership?
Of course we can not. So what you need to do is buy Cary's book, Jonathan's book, and take their classes.
You ask: "we need keep all archive log in backup files or we need to remove old archive files?"
Remove the old ones after being absolutely sure you have a good backup.
You ask: "where we can take backup tape drive,SAN,disk removable hard disk? which one is better?"
No one solution is better than the other. They are all adequate. -
Replication Error in Quotation from CRM to ECC
Hi All,
This is regarding the Replication error which we are getting in the Quotation/Orders in the CRM server, when the Quotation/Orders is getting replicated to ECC server.
Let me explain the process,
We have the Internet Sales Application (ISA Version 5.0) implemented with B2B Scenario.
Dealers create Quotes from ISA for Configurable materials. The Configurable material has a "knowledge base" version already created in ECC in the table "SCEKB". Based on the configuration of the material, the knowledge base version of the material gets updated time to time.
When dealers create Quote for Configurable material from ISA, the latest "knowledge base" version gets determined in the Quotation. As a process, a new knowledge base version for the configurable is created for the material subsequently.
When Dealers are creating Orders for the Quotation from ISA, the order gets created in CRM server but does not get replicated to ECC due to the following error.
Internal error in communication between configuration and sales doc.CONFIGURATION_PROCESSING (Notification A V1 854)
Item 000100 does not exist (Notification E V1 331).
We suspect that the Order when getting replicated to ECC, is trying to determine the latest "knowledge base" version in the system for the material and since there is a mis-match between the Order and the "SCEKB" table, the Order is not getting replicated to ECC.
Can someone tell me how to suppress the above error and get the Order replicated to ECC without any issues.
Thanks,
RaviHi Ravi,
Did you managed to get a solution for this?
We have a similiar situation, can you please provide an input if you have any?
Thanks,
Sindhur. -
Maximum number of nodes in Multimaster Replication
Has anyone setup a multimaster replication environment on 8.1.7 with more than 11 nodes?
What could be the maximum number of nodes for reliable operation?Hi,
With Oracle 8.1 you can have upto 9; but I think you can have under one of the replicated DB another replicated DB. tree like tructure.
Best,
EA -
Hello experts,
when running a process chain I get an replication error.
it says
"..the DataSource 8Z_ODS_1 (its an ODS-Object) has a different timestamp in sourcesystem than in Business Information Warehouse ..."
I have no clue what this is supposed to mean!
any suggestions?
thanx
AxelHi Linda,
1. You can use the below program to activate.
RS_TRANSTRU_ACTIVATE_ALL porgram (se38) -> give the infosource name and activate.
2. Or search the Infosource in RSA1 and go into the Tranfer rules and click on activate button.
If you do not have authorisation in your Quality or Production server for the above two steps, do the step 2 in Development. You will be prompted for a transport request creation. Create the TR and release it to the target server.
regards,
Archana -
In a MultiMaster Replication to not propagate changes on Second DB
Hello,
I've setup a multimaster replication environment with DB1 and DB2.
DB1 replicates all changes on some tables to DB2. But i don't want to DB2 to propagate changes to DB1. So, i didn't create a scheduled link on DB2 to propagate changes to DB1. But deferred transaction queue is getting too large on DB2. How can i settle the DB2 to not to put the changes to deferred transactions?
RegardsReplicating from DB1 to DB2 and allowing local updates on DB2 without propagating them back to DB1 is done with WRITABLE MATERIALIZED VIEWS, not MultiMaster Replication.
Changes made at DB2 are "local" until they are overwritten by changes from DB1.
See http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14226/repoverview.htm#sthref57
Hemant K Chitale
http://hemantoracledba.blogspot.com -
Is schema replicated in multimaster replication scenario?
hellos
I am asking basic question. I have set up a multimaster replication (ids5.1sp2) on database c=fi.. this works well.
however, in the future I know that more objectClasses and attributes will be added to the schema.
My simple question.. is do I have to amend the 99user.ldif files on BOTH ids5.1 servers or can I rely on the schema being replicated.
thanks.Schema is supposed to replicate in all replication scenario's
The documentation states
"The best way to guarantee schema consistency is to make schema modifications on a single master server, even in the case of a multi-master replication environment.
Schema replication happens automatically. If replication has been configured between a supplier and a consumer, schema replication will happen by default."
However a few people in this forum have complained that this replication doesn't always work - so be sure to check to make sure the schema does in fact replicate.
For more information on schema replication check out this link:
http://docs.sun.com/source/816-5609-10/rep.htm#1063947
It is at the bottom of the page ...
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I stream iPad to apple tv
How do stream iPad to tv using apple tv
-
Minor bug in photo app since 5.1
as said just a minor issue ... not sure if that's wanted in 5.1 : okay in 5.0/5.0.1 adding photos to an existing album showed, while being processed (so very shortly) the number of photos just added on the corresponding album entry in the list. This
-
You must supply a valid username and password in Hyp 11.1.1.3.0
HI, We have successfully installed New version of Hyperion 11.1.1.3. Configuration is successfull. When running validation one error occurs. We are unable to log in workspace as we are required to 'supply a valid username and password'. We log in as
-
How do i activate the end user agreement
how do i activate the end user agreemenr???
-
Zen MicroPhoto will not STOP charg
Recently my MicroPhoto will not stop charging. I had it plugged in for a long time and it wasn't done charging yet and I thought for sure it had to be because it was charging for a few hours and the battery was only about 50% used. So I unplugged it