Multiple message threads for single contact

A friend of mine happens to send iMessages from two accounts and it creates two message threads in Messages for me. Is there a way to somehow show one thread covering single account, even though it has multiple "physical" sources? Thanks.

No.

Similar Messages

  • I get two message threads for one contact. One for sms and one for iMessage since I updated to iOS 7. How can I get them both into one thread?

    Ever since I upgraded to iOS7 just two of my contacts I get two message threads for them. One containing their iMessages to me and the other with just regular sms messages. In Contacs, their email and phone number are saved under one name. How can I get the iMessages and sms to come through under one thread in my messaging app again?

    I am having this trouble also, my partner creates a new message to send to me, or sends a picture and it always comes through as an MMS and not using iMessage ...
    will try deleting everything and starting again!

  • Multiple message threads from same person

    I have multiple message threads from the same person in messages on my iPhone and iPad. One comes from their phone number and one from their email. Here are all the details, I would love to be able to combine them into one thread.
    This other person and myself each have a new MacBook Pro, iPad Air 2, I have an iPhone 6 and they have an iPhone 5S. They are all updated with the most recent system software.
    On my MacBook Pro, the conversations that are split on my iPhone and iPad are not split. On the MacBook Pro, all of the texts from both conversations are appearing in one. In my contacts which are syncing with iCloud I have both the phone number and email address of this other person.
    I have messages set up on all of my devices to send and receive from my phone number and my email, start new conversations is from my phone number. This other person has it set up the exact same way on all of their devices.
    So why when I text this person from one conversation thread and they respond it comes through to the other conversation thread?
    Why can't I seem to join these two conversations when everything is set up the way it should be and they ARE joined on my MacBook Pro but not my iPhone and iPad?

    She kept the same number on her new phone, but now there are 2 conversation threads. A new one started with messages sent from the new phone, the old phone should be out of service now. Why didn''t  messages sent by the new phone resume in the same conversation? I assume because it's a different IMEI.  But now whenever I use her  phone number to create a new message, it goes in the old IMEI*'s conversation thread and is therefore not delivered. It's in green so it thinks it's an SMS also not a iMessage device.
    If I want to send a message correctly  to the new phone, I have to make sure I  go into the correct newer thread and enter it there,
    For your second answer, the person is receiving the message but the thread now says "email address", not the person's name in the contact list. The sender is sending to the person's phone number, not her email address.

  • Multiple webdynpro applications for single webdynnpro component

    I am working on a object which have multiple webdynpro applications for single webdynnpro component.How to assign a different functionality to each application bcoz when we right click on webdynnpro component and select create webdynpro applications ,it just creates a application how so we assign diff functionality to each of them .Also in the parameter tab of the webdynpro applications ,there is a diff config id mentioned for each application.what is its relavance .
    Rgds,
    Praveen

    Hi Saravanan,
    I need to modify it from the portal end, not at the application level.
    I need some configuration steps which specifies how to modify the Detail Navigation in PPM. Using SPRO we can do some configuration, i wanted to know whether its possible from portal end as well.
    Regards
    Shivas Bhan

  • Multiple storage locations for single material - ECC 6.0

    Hi
    Can anyone let me know, how one can map multiple storage loctions for single material?
    regards
    Sanjay

    hello,
    Go to SPRO --> IMG --> Materials Management --> Inventory Management and Physical Inventory --> Plant Parameters.
    Tick Create storage locations automatically. System will extend the material to the storage location maintained in the transaction.
    Nikhil

  • Hi I have a problem. Problem I have is that I want to buy the software. Message constant "for assistance,contact itunes suport or biling info" is displayed.

    Hi I have a problem. Problem I have is that I want to buy the software. Message constant "for assistance,contact itunes suport or biling info" is displayed.

    You can contact iTunes Support via this link and ask them for help (we are fellow users on these forums, we won't know why the message is appearing) : http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/ - click on Contact iTunes Store Support on the right-hand side of the page, then Purchases, Billing & Redemption

  • Multiple jobs for single contact?

    Hi: Does anyone know if you can put in multiple jobs and companies for a single contact in Address Book? I really don't want to make a separate but identical contact for each job a person has.
    Thanks.

    if you are talking about the "Job Title" field there can only be one per contact. same for company.

  • Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

    The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
    time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
    Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
    with such simple but important tasks.
    I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added. 
    One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
    find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based  on your email history and social media accounts setup.
    And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
    To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list)  that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
    result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
    For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
    Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook  2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
    As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
    random contacts.
    From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on  based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
    address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
    And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
    We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
    (And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
    ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
    Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
    For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
    book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
    If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave),  no results are found at all.
    Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
    I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields. 
    Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding  their info and
    I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
    ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
    For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
    In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
    only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
    ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
    Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply  cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
    field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing  that would prevent them from showing up in results.
    These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
    address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
    For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
    main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
    Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

    Thanks for your reply.
    1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
    I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
    2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
    already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
    Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
    local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
    Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
    ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
    Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book! 
    In summary:
    We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
    We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
    There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
    There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
    Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
    One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
    I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
    I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

  • Adding multiple email address for same contact to mail group

    Is it possible (in Apple Mail) to add a second email (work) address for a contact to an email group, how?

    Sorry, but Address Book does not allow you to select more than one email address to send to in a group. There's really no reason why people need multiple copies of a message, anyway; they have the option of forwarding email to another email address of theirs.
    Mulder

  • I have two birthday reminders for single contacts?

    Firstly, I apologise if this has been asked elsewhere but it was proving difficult to search through all the other threads.
    Ok so for some reason i've got two different birthday reminders for some contacts. I'm using Windows Live Mail and I synced all my contacts from there onto my ipod and the birthdays have carried over (I think, not sure if all of them but hey). I am sure that I did manually put the birthdays in for a couple of contacts a while before I synced all the contacts from WLM so that could be the reason for some, but there are definitely others which I couldn't have done - reason being I don't know the date of their birthday. One has a red dot next to it, the other is a picture of a present/gift.
    Here's a screenshot:
    Now if possible, I would prefer to have them all just as the one with the present next to it... so anyone know what's going on here?
    Also, some of them show up with the nickname instead of the full name (I fixed them all before I synced). I double-checked in WLM and in the contacts folder in my document and this guy had an empty box for 'nickname' on both accounts.... yet it still shows up as his nickname
    So anyone know how to fix this? I'm a bit of an OCD freak so it's driving me insane haha
    Thanks

    Not to worry. When you imported your calendars from Windows Live, it synced the birthdays you had there. Since you also entered the birthdays for some of the same people on their contact information as well, it shows up twice because it automatically pushed the birthday to the calendar. You have to choose between Windows Live calendars or your device's conatcts. Essentially speaking, it would the best decision to choose the one that has the most birthdays already entered. I'll give you both scenarios, however:
    If you want to get rid of the Windows Live birthday:
    -Tap the event that has the dot next to it
    -Edit the event
    -Delete the event (and all recurring events)
    **I believe this will also delete the event across all other devices that have the Windows Live account synced
    If you want to get rid of the contact's birthday that you entered manually:
    -Go into your Contacts on your iOS device
    -Go to the contact that has the birthday that is repeated (for example, the pictures that you included: "Calum Leask.")
    -Edit the contact
    -Remove the birthday from the contact
    I hope I was of help

  • Multiple message types for an idoc type

    Hi all,
    I created one custom idoc type with six segments. I heard that one idoc type can have any number of message types
    if it is so pls tell me how to assign these two message types for my idoc .
    i want to create multiple message types because i want to send same idoc type to diff legacy systems.
    My requirement is message type one is only for first three segments and message type two is for another three segments .
    The outbound program 1 for mess type 1 should fill fill the data for only first three segments and second outbound program corresponding to mess type 2 should fill the data for last three segments
    how should i design for my requirement. suppose if the idoc has two message types then it has two outbound programs?

    Hi Kunal,
    Below are my thoughts from a design perspective,
    My requirement is message type one is only for first three segments and message type two is for another three segments .
    The outbound program 1 for mess type 1 should fill fill the data for only first three segments and second outbound program corresponding to mess type 2 should fill the data for last three segments
    Before you look upon the no. of message types you need, i guess you need to look at the business requirement. Per your requirement you want to send send two sub sets of data. The first subset in the first 3 segments and other three segments for the second subset of data.
    Is the structure of the first subset of data similar to the second subset If not, better to create two IDOC Types. If they are similar, then create one IDOC Type with three segments and have two message types for each subset of data.
    For Ex: ORDERS05 is the IDOC type for Orders, this IDOC type provides capability to carry data related to any type of orders
    but the action on the data is facilitated by the message type like ORDERS for create, ORDCHG for change, ORDRSP for Order response etc.
    OR
    Are these two subsets of data related to each other, if yes understand the relation? If not related at all then you might be better of creating two separate IDOC Types.
    Like in the above example A purchase order is related to a sales order so you can use the same IDOC type, but in case of a order response and ASN that data sent is different and hence you will need different IDOC types (even though a SO is related to a DN).
    how should i design for my requirement. suppose if the idoc has two message types then it has two outbound programs?
    The above again depends on the how tightly/loosely coupled are the data sets, you can have just one program and have a simple case statement on the message types or have two different programs.
    You will also have to consider points like, if any of the subsets is more prone to more change in terms of the structure and associated business logic. If yes, then you might want to keep the programs separate to reduce work on regression testing etc.
    I am sure you will receive more inputs from the experts on the forum and the list of points to look for will get longer , so understand the requirement, dependencies and if you have any specific questions you could post it on the forum.
    Regards,
    Chen

  • Multiple message types for IDoc types

    Hi,
    can we assign multiple message types to IDoc Types?
    Is so How to make it
    Thanks in Advance....
    Regards
    Sravya

    Hi,
       For an IDOC Basic Type is the structure which defines the skeleton of the data transfer like what all fields can be present, how many times a field can appear, is it mandatory etc.
      A message type is a label used to identification.
    Message type come into picture because we can use the same IDOC basic type for any number of applications. So it becomes necessary that we need some other tag to identify & distinguish between all these. Message Type helps in this cause.
    Message type & Basic Type are linked in WE82.

  • How to use multiple tape drive for single filesystem on single client.

    Hello All.
    I want to backup single filesystem with multiple tape drive.
    Incase of Symantec veritas netbackup "NEW_STREAM" for multi-stream backup.
    Backup client has a  single backup filesystem like /data1  directory with 4 LTO6 drives.
    /data1 directory doesn't have a sub-direcotry, just present a files.
    If /data1 directory has a sub-directory like /data1/aaa, /data1/bbb, /data1/ccc , Is it possible to use multiple drives?
    Please anybody answer the questions.
    Thanks advanced.

    See how to use multiple tape drive from single client when I want to backup single filesystem?

  • Multiple Excise Invoice for Single GRPO

    Hello All
    How do we create multiple excise invoices from a single GRPO document.
    Thanks
    Santhosh.K

    Hi
    As per the scenario you mentioned.
    You can't create multiple Excise Invoice against Single GRPO. And as per the law of excise also there is no way to do like this.
    Gate  Pass  made against delivery when some vendor send the item to the client. Time quantity and rate with the duties are mentioned in that.
    similarly when client received the material all the above should be there in the gate pass.
    Ashish Gupte

  • Multiple email addresses for single characteristics in Email Bursting

    Hello Experts,
    We have requirement of Bursting email to external sales representative with only their relevent data.
    We have used Bex Broadcaster with email Bursting as distribution type . But the problem is we have to send out
    email to multiple sales reps for a particular sales rep i.e for a particular Sales rep we have to maintain multiple
    email ids of sales rep and infoObj can have only 60 chars long. So I cannot put more than one email id.
    Is there any work around to overcome this difficulty.
    Also I could have use individula schedule but number of schedleis very high around 200.
    Thanks,

    I understand you issue and I dont think It can be solved in BW as they system is not expecting the users email address to be more that 60 chars,  however you could create a rule in outlook (or whatever mail application you use) to forward all emails containing this header to the other email addresses.   Thats my only idea

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to install os if cd rom is not working

    I had to install a new hard drive, but now I can't get the OS install disk to work

  • Entry to be passed

    Rspected gurus, I have to transfer the balances form oracle to SAP, actually the amount is small insted of using the BDC program , we can manually pass an entry in sap for profit &loss A/C,Sundry creditors-expenses, Inter division-corp.office,Inter d

  • DHTML Tree Expand-Collapse ALL buttons

    Hi I am using at DHTML Tree (in APEX 3.0.1) as a menu. I am wondering if it is possible to add buttons (or link) to the region which a user can click to expand all or collapse all nodes in the tree. I don not want the tree to be expanded or collapsed

  • Items and SQL Types

    I've just started learning apex and I'm confused about page/application items. Since they can be used in SQL and PL/SQL as some kind of variables (for example using bind variable syntax), at some point they should be prescribed a type, since SQL and

  • PO Confirmation with Delivery Date Validation Check

    Dear Experts, We have requirement in SNC to restrict PO confirmation within a agreed Delivery Date tolerance. This Delivery date validation should work similar to the Quantity validation we have in SAP standard through the PO_ITMUNDERDELIVERY/ PO_ITM