Multiple POD's per instance?

Can a single Oracle CRM On Demand instance be on multiple POD's? Do the POD's for an instance ever change?
Thanks!
-Kevin

As far as I know, one single instance cannot be on multiple pods. I don't see an easy way of sharing data between pods or even within the same pod with different Company ID's.

Similar Messages

Multiple SPNs per instance?

Multiple Instance, Multiple Statically Assigned ports 'per' instance. eg;
Instance1 - ports 15000, 15001, 15002
Instance2 - ports 16000, 16001, 16002
Port 15000 - DatabaseA
Port 15002 - DatabaseB
Port 15002 - DatabaseC
Port 16000 - DatabaseD
Port 16001 - DatabaseE
Port 16002 - DatabaseF
Each 'instance' uses a different Domain User account.
Does each port need to be registered with a server principle name? Or is just one ok? Ie:
Instance1:
setspn -A MSSQLSvc/myhost.redmond.microsoft.com:15000 microsoft\domainaccountname1
setspn -A MSSQLSvc/myhost.redmond.microsoft.com:15001 microsoft\domainaccountname1
setspn -A MSSQLSvc/myhost.redmond.microsoft.com:15002 microsoft\domainaccountname1
Instance2:
setspn -A MSSQLSvc/myhost.redmond.microsoft.com:16000 microsoft\domainaccountname2
setspn -A MSSQLSvc/myhost.redmond.microsoft.com:16001 microsoft\domainaccountname2
setspn -A MSSQLSvc/myhost.redmond.microsoft.com:16002 microsoft\domainaccountname2

Hi,
I think you need to registry the SPN with the each different port numbers that was used by the SQL Server instance.
Per
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms677949(v=vs.85).aspx
A given service instance can have multiple SPNs if there are multiple names that clients might use for authentication. For example, an SPN always includes the name of the host computer on which the service instance is running, so a service
instance might register an SPN for each name or alias of its host.
Note: an SPN must be unique in the forest in which it is registered. If it is not unique, authentication will fail.
Reference:
How to Configure an SPN for SQL Server Site Database Servers
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb735885.aspx
Thanks.
Tracy Cai
TechNet Community Support

Does a CQC really need a separate thread/event queue per instance?

Does a ContinousQueryCache really need a separate thread/event queue per instance?
Is it possible to get multiple cqc's to share a single event queue?

Test case to reproduce shown below, i.e. new thread per CQC.
Sample code:
=====================================
NamedCache dummyCache = CacheFactory.getCache("A");
dummyCache.put("hello", "B");
dummyCache.put("world", "C");
ContinuousQueryCache cqcA = new ContinuousQueryCache(dummyCache, new EqualsFilter("toString", "B"), new MultiplexingMapListener() {
@Override
protected void onMapEvent(MapEvent mapEvent) {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName());
ContinuousQueryCache cqcB = new ContinuousQueryCache(dummyCache, new EqualsFilter("toString", "C"), new MultiplexingMapListener() {
@Override
protected void onMapEvent(MapEvent mapEvent) {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName());
=================================
Output:
EventQueue:ContinuousQueryCache{Cache=A, Filter=EqualsFilter(.toString(), B)}
EventQueue:ContinuousQueryCache{Cache=A, Filter=EqualsFilter(.toString(), C)}
=================================
Thread dump:
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (11.2-b01 mixed mode, sharing):
"EventQueue:ContinuousQueryCache{Cache=A, Filter=EqualsFilter(.toString(), C)}" daemon prio=6 tid=0x034d8800 nid=0x16b4 in Object.wait() [0x03b2f000..0x03b2fa94]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
     at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
     - waiting on <0x22d80068> (a com.tangosol.util.TaskDaemon)
     at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:485)
     at com.tangosol.util.TaskDaemon.takeNextRipeTask(TaskDaemon.java:345)
     - locked <0x22d80068> (a com.tangosol.util.TaskDaemon)
     at com.tangosol.util.TaskDaemon.run(TaskDaemon.java:103)
     at com.tangosol.util.Daemon$DaemonWorker.run(Daemon.java:714)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
"EventQueue:ContinuousQueryCache{Cache=A, Filter=EqualsFilter(.toString(), B)}" daemon prio=6 tid=0x034d7400 nid=0x1370 in Object.wait() [0x03adf000..0x03adfb14]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
     at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
     - waiting on <0x22d80138> (a com.tangosol.util.TaskDaemon)
     at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:485)
     at com.tangosol.util.TaskDaemon.takeNextRipeTask(TaskDaemon.java:345)
     - locked <0x22d80138> (a com.tangosol.util.TaskDaemon)
     at com.tangosol.util.TaskDaemon.run(TaskDaemon.java:103)
     at com.tangosol.util.Daemon$DaemonWorker.run(Daemon.java:714)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)

How to configure multiple smtp servers per domain

Hi,
how do we configure multiple smtp servers per domain/corporate in iplanet messaging server 5.2. i wanted to do this so that i can configure some domains with virus scanning and some domains without antivirus.

Hi Martin,
Well we are trying to run a report without exactly specifying the name of reports server anywhere, e.g. in database or in form or anywhere else. Now if I do not supply a reports server name using RUN_REPORT_OBJECT, the error it displays is FRM-41211: Integration Error : SSL failure ... However if I specify the reports server name in the form, the reports run perfect. Also the name of reports server is specified in rwservlet.properties.
Now the question goes as follows:
Can I run my report from Form without specifying the name of the Reports server anywhere at all. This is so because either an in-process reports server should be picked or the one which is entered in rwservlet.properties should be pickec up by default. Please correct us if we are wrong. once we are through with it, we have to move to Oracle 10gR2 concept of reports server.
Thanks in anticipation,
Ruchi/Saurabh

Estimating number of users per instance

hi gurus,
This is a simple but critical question for me. How to estimate number of users per instance.
example if database size is 1.2 terrabytes then how many users can we have? and how can we know the num of users for a exixting instance?
Reddy

Hi Reddy,
Basically it is sizing question, and it depends on the hardware you have, the performance level you expect, and how well the system is tuned...
Transaction ST07 shows how many users are currently on the system.
Thank you,
Victor

ST03N-- LOAD DIST-- USERS PER INSTANCE, Shows only "1" user every time

Hello,
Users per instance data is not updated. I guess related job is not running.
Any help on this would be appreciated.
[http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/4818/usersu.jpg]
Thanks
Manny.

Manny,
Check that the following programs are scheduled, as well as all the standard jobs:
RSCOLL00
RSSTAT88
Also, you may want to review the following note:
Note 1158293 - ST03N: Display TOTAL data for current day, week and month
Also, please verify the following :
-     Up to date kernel
-     Up to date saposcol
-     SPS level
What do you get when you double-click on one of the servers in the instance list?
Hope this helps.
PJ

Multiple clients on one instance of SAP SolMan

Hello,
I have doubt about the conductibility of SAP Solution Manager to support more than one client, as an example, ones for Development and the other for production. I think that the limitation is due to the Java side which does not allow to perform more than one client.
Up to know, I have browsed SAP Solution documents and have not found any indication about this kind of restriction, more than 1 client per instance of SAP SolMan.
Look forward in hearing from your insight comments.
Regards,
Rodolfo Neuhaus

Installation guide:
http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000718044&_OBJECT=011000358700000291922009E
page 37:
4.1.7 SAP Solution Manager Client Strategy
SAP delivers a client with a standard configuration for SAP Solution Manager as part of the installation
process. Client 000 is the initial configuration client, and client 001 is provided for productive use.
Additional clients can be created if desired
So I don't see an issue...but i would not recommend it...

Maximum number of NIO DatagramChannels per instance

Hi all
im coding an application which requires to create over 1000 DatagramChannels per instance of the application.
My environment is Solaris 8 & JDK 1.4.2._05.
Im able to create only 508 channels, if i try to create 509th channel it throws the following exception:
java.net.SocketException: Too many open files
at sun.nio.ch.Net.socket0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.Net.socket(Net.java:96)
at sun.nio.ch.DatagramChannelImpl.<init>(DatagramChannelImpl.java:83)
at sun.nio.ch.SelectorProviderImpl.openDatagramChannel(SelectorProviderImpl.java:23)
at java.nio.channels.DatagramChannel.open(DatagramChannel.java:82)
Please note my solaris environment states the ulimit to be "unlimited"
Can anybody throw some light on this??
Thanks,

I can open 3968 on Windows XP with this:
import java.net.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.nio.channels.*;
public class DatagramChannelCount
     public static void     main(String[] args) throws Exception
          int     count = 0;
          List<DatagramChannel>     list = new LinkedList<DatagramChannel>();
          try
               for (;;)
                    DatagramChannel     dsch = DatagramChannel.open();
                    dsch.socket().bind(new InetSocketAddress(0));
                    list.add(dsch);
                    count++;
                    if ((count % 10) == 0)
                         System.out.println(count+" channels open.");
          catch (Exception exc)
               exc.printStackTrace();
          System.out.println("Created "+count+" datagram channels.");
}

Multiple log groups per thread to improve performance with high redo writes

I am reading Pro Oracle 10g RAC on Linux (good book). On p.35 the authors state that they recommend 3-5 redo log groups per thread if there is a "large" amount of redo.
Who does having more redo log groups improve performance? Does oracle paralelize the writes?

redo logs are configured per instance, from experience you need atleast 3 redo log groups per thread to help switch over and sufficient time for archives to complete before reuse of the first redo log group. When you have a large redo log activity there is a potential that redo log groups will switch more often and it is important that archive has completed before an exisiting redo log group can be reused, else the database /instance may hang.
I think that is what the author is referencing here, have sufficient redo log groups (based on the acitivty of your environment) to allow switching and allowing sufficient time for archives to complete.

How many server nodes can you create per instance

Hi,
Very often the bottle neck in a java installation (NW04s) is the heap size. In order to increase the heap you simple create new server nodes.
My question is:
How many server nodes can you create per instance?
Is there an upper limit before you have to create a new dialog instance (with a web dispatcher)?
I can imagine that when you create a new server node you also have to increase the heap and max therad of the dispatcher. Is there any upper limit of the heap size of the dispatcher node ?

Rasmus , I think you laid out a real good scenario for every one to contribute
I may be very late but just updating this forum for benefit of everyone who visits this.
In addition to all the points above one must also consider following things if one decides to add more server nodes to one dispatcher
1.Garbage collection time
2.Dispatcher would keep on sending request to node S2 if it is not completely bad and there by impacting all the servernode so you might end up restartiing the entire cluster.
3,Debugging also becomes diffculy as you are not sure on which server node you are within the cluster.
4.If you have something like F5 which does hear beat monitoring even one server node goes bad F5 will not report anything.
So in my view one server node per dispatcher is an ideal configuration.
Over All Dispatcher does not consume more resouces (Disk Space + CPU + memory ) at the same time it will give you maintenance flexibility.
Nothing is right or wrong ,all these things are based on how your infrastructure set up is.
Cheers !!
Manish Jain

Is the CQ5 lisense per instance or per user on the instance?

Is the CQ5 lisense per instance or per user on the instance?

Please ask your Adobe sales rep for licensing models available to you. There is no general answer to this question.
Jörg

Per instance pipeline configuration issue. SOAP faults..

Hi,
We have two different BizTalk applications calling the same web service (Dynamics AX 2012 to be precise). We want to avoid creating a shared BizTalk application containing the schemas for the web service, so we hoped that using per-instance pipeline configuration
might help (setting the DocSpecName property on XmlReceive pipeline of the request-response send port).
It worked fine, but when we received the XLangSoap exception from AX, we got the following error message:
No Disassemble stage components can recognize the data.
So it appears BizTalk tried to resolve the Fault message against the one specified in the DocSpecName property and of course it failed.
Any suggestions or our only option is still to create shared BizTalk application with the schemas?
Thanks a lot!

Almost. You would need two different Receive Pipelines, one for each Project/Application, each with it's own XmlDisassembler.
That XmlDisassembler will reference, via the Document Schemas option the 'local' schemas and also the Soap Fault built-in Schema.
However, keep in mind that there are some really weird rules about Schema resolution within the same Assembly so to have it work reliably, you may have to put the Pipelines in separate Projects. There's nothing wrong with that.

Multiple shared memory segments per instance (redhat AS2.1)

We are having some trouble with oracle 9.2.0 on redhat linux advanced server. ipcs shows that quite a lot of shm segments are allocated for a single instance, which is quite strange since it should be one. Did anyone out there encounter similar problems ?
------ Shared Memory Segments --------
key shmid owner perms bytes nattch status
0x00000000 12845056 oracle 640 4194304 13
0x00000000 12877825 oracle 640 33554432 13
0x00000000 12910594 oracle 640 25165824 13
0x00000000 12943363 oracle 640 20971520 13
0x00000000 12976132 oracle 640 29360128 13
0x00000000 13008901 oracle 640 29360128 13
0x00000000 13041670 oracle 640 20971520 13
0x00000000 13074439 oracle 640 33554432 13
0xe7f3c788 13107209 oracle 640 33554432 65

The maximum size of the shared memory segment is too small. Since Oracle cannot fit the SGA into one large shared memory segment, it allocates several shared memory segments. The maximum size of your shared memory segments is around 32 MB.
To set the maximum size for a shared memory segment, see http://www.puschitz.com/TuningLinuxForOracle.shtml#SettingSHMMAXParameter
Werner

Calling Multiple (and parallel) ActiveX instances

I'm having a problem of running multiple activeX instances using LabVIEW (apparently the problem occurs with more than 4 instances). This problem doesn't happen when I do the same thing in C (Visual Studio). I can create as many instances as I wish, but when I run methods that hang or run for a long period of time, only 4 are able to run at each moment. If I stop any one of the methods, the next one starts running.
I attached an example (in LabVIEW 8.5.1) of using the excel activeX automation, but it happens with all of the activeX's I tried so far. It even happens when using several different activeXs.
Please notice, that the problem is not with creating the instances, but when running methods of the activeX in parallel at the same time (If you run short methods that finish executing fast, you won't notice the problem).
Attachments:
Instances of Excel1.vi ‏23 KB

I think you're running into the max number of threads LabVIEW allocates per execution system (4 by default). All of this code is running in one VI and hence one execution system. You can do a quick test to confirm this. Select one or more of your parallel instances and create separate subVIs from them. Then go into those subVI properties and go to the Execution category. Select various execution systems for the VIs. Make one DAQ, for instance, another Instrument I/O, and another Other 1 or whatever. When you rerun your test after that you'll see all six File IO dialogs pop up simultaneously.
Even though LabVIEW is using only four threads in each execution system, it will still multitask between various things to achieve as much parallelism as possible. This is what you saw when you said that as soon as one method finished, another one would start up.
I'm not too familiar with dealing with execution systems to achieve highly scalable applications, unfortunately. Most of the time LabVIEW gives you something really good out of the box without having to think about execution systems. And when you run applications on Timed Loops, that helps LabVIEW divide up application threads better as well.
But you could start by seeing if you can divide up your ActiveX routines somehow and then duplicate the code into subVIs that run in different execution systems.
Another option is to manipulate the TreadConfig VI that ships with LabVIEW. Check out the following VI:
<LabVIEW>\vi.lib\Utility\sysinfo.llb\threadconfig.vi
You can increase the number of threads LabVIEW will allocate for each execution system to up to 8.
Here's a help topic with more info.
Message Edited by Jarrod S. on 05-12-2008 09:30 PM
Jarrod S.
National Instruments

Use multiple iPhones with 1 instance of iTunes?

Hi Guys,
Be gentle with me as this is my first post and I'm not sure if this is correct discussion board, anyhow...
I have been tasked by my bosses to do some research on the possibility of using iPhones as a business communication, email and document device to be used by the senior management of my firm.
Basically, what we need is to be able to "sync" calenders, receive email, share documentation and contacts all using one instance of iTunes. This is to enable us to keep their data uptodate and identical etc.
The users also have the option of using iTunes at home to do non business work i.e. upload music and videos.
I am aware of the apple configuration tool to create multiple but identical "profiles" that can be applied to each and every phone.
My questions are:
1. Can we use one iTunes account (billed to the company using one credit card?) that can used by several staff at home? Or do we need to create accounts for every user?
2. Is there any applications that can help us "sync" all phones either connected to our business version of iTunes or even "over the air"? Bearing in mind that if the user connects to iTunes at home it doesn't wipe important data!
3. Can anyone recommend applications that we can preload onto the phones that will assist the user becoming familiar with the functionality of the iPhone? This would help us as we wouldn't have to show each and every user how the iPhone works!
4. Lastly any advice on applications that would give us the ability to control and maintain all these instances of iPhones easily and without giving us a major headache?
Thank you for any advice.
MC

You should check into MobileMe. It's an Apple service that allows you to sync mail, contacts, and calendars over the air to your iPhone.
My wife and I both have iPhones and use MobileMe to keep them identical in terms of contacts and calendars.
You could use one iTunes account with multiple iPhones, however, you're not going to get over the air syncing.
Message was edited by: Benjamin Brossard

Multiple POD's per instance?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for