Multiple users accessing single application in HTML DB 2.1 with XE

Hi,
I am struggling to setup an application in HTMLDB 2.1 on XE.
I would like multiple users to be able to access the same application. I have created the application and the users but now I need to give the new users access to the application.
Can some highlight how to do this? Is it with authorisation schemes?
Thanks
Joel.

Joel,
Have you reviewed the XE documentation on Managing End Users?
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B25329_01/doc/appdev.102/b25309/wrkspc.htm#CHDDFDCH
Sergio

Similar Messages

Multiple users accessing single batch

hi,
i am going to use a specific batch for all plants same time by multiple users, now i am facing issue more than one user started using it get blocked by another user.
so i don't want to unlock the other user,, i want to access the material/batch by multiple user simultaneously without blocking others....
Thanks
Muthuraman.D

hi,
while generating sales orders using BAPI for multiple plants at same time for specific material/batch it's get blocked by another user. sometime it may happens due to material or sometime happens due to batches...
I want to update all orders without affecting others....I am not confident with the abap way of solutions...
can you suggest prompt solution for the above issue...
Thanks
Muthuraman.D

Running multiple User Profile Service Applications -- recommendations, pitfalls, etc.

I have a farm with one WFE, one APP, and one SQL server. The User Profile Service runs on both WFE and APP, the User Profile Sync Service is on the APP server. There is a single User Profile service application running that pulls from 4 different AD
import sources: two in the US, one in London, and one in Mexico.
There is a nightly incremental synch.
There is an issue where the London users need the synch to occur hourly.
There are some complexities with one of the US sources in that would make it difficult to run the current User Profile service hourly, plus there is a performance concern.
I'm interested in possibly creating a second User Profile Service Application that reads only from London and runs hourly.
Beyond creating the User Profile service and scheduling hourly, what should I be concerned about?
Will I need to (re)create new Audiences based on those from the original User Profile Service App? Run them immediately after User Profiles? Will there be an interruption in access during that gap?
Recreate custom User Properties?
Recreate any Forefront modifications?
New Profile/Sync/Social DBs?
etc?
Thanks,
Scott

Hi Scott,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to use multiple user profile service application.
Yes, you can do it. Only one user profile application can be configured to work with the Profile Synchronization Instance. If you want more UPS instance, you need to start UPS on different server.
Here are some similar posts for you to take a look at:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c922d0a8-db7f-4bdd-87a2-686c836bf406/is-it-possible-to-have-multiple-user-profile-service-applications-on-a-single-server-farm?forum=sharepointadminprevious
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/c771591b-bff6-4d57-99a1-7d46ca1d9903/multiple-user-profiles-service-applications?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/26da9723-70a5-43a2-a2b5-faebe60dbe1a/is-it-possible-to-have-multiple-user-profile-service-applications-on-a-single-farm?forum=sharepointadminprevious
Best Regards,
Wendy
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

ARCA Xtra - multiple user access to SQLite DB

Hi Guys,
I have having trouble with multiple users accessing a SQLite DB file from a projector. They can all open and browse the data through the projector fine, but if USER1 makes a change and clicks save, and then USER2 tries access the DB it causes USER2 to get a script error.
Is it possible to write a script which tells the user that the DB is being modified so please wait, rather than throwing them out of the projector with a script error
Thankyou

If you want multiple users to access a database then you would probably be better off using one designed for that purpose like MySQL.
But, if you are set on SQLite and if you can have multiple simultaneous connections which you seem to imply you can, then the best solution I can think of is to create a Class/Script that handles all the details of polling the database for availability and handles other issues like a progress dialogue box.
You have to treat the database as an asynchronous action - meaning you send it a query and at some latter time it sends a result back via a callback. Doing it this way greatly simplifies any database queries you want to make. As long as your queries are fairly simple like SELECT, INSERT, DELETE, etc. then the code is fairly straight forward.
Off the top of my head I wrote something to get you started. I have not tested this code but it does compile. The following is a Parent script that you would use to interface to your database in an asynchronous manner.
-- Asynchronus SQLite
property pDB -- instance of Arca xtra
property pTimeoutTime -- how long in milliseconds to ping database
property pPingTime -- time between database pings.
property RunningQuery -- Boolean. is a query running? true/false
property pTimeOb -- timout object for polling the database
property pCurOperation -- set of data for current query
property pPingCount -- how many times the current query has pinged the database
property pAlertBox -- a MIAW, LDM, or a Sprite that informs the user as to the progress of the query.
on new me
arcaregister([0000,000,0000])
pDB = xtra("arca").new()
Result = pDB.openDB(the moviepath & "ST_data")
if Result.errorMsg then
    alert("Error Opening Database" & return & pDB.explainError(Result.errorMsg))
    return void
end if
pTimeoutTime = 10000
pPingTime = 250
RunningQuery = false
pAlertBox = Sprite(1000) -- for example
return me
end new
on cleanup me
pDB.closeDB()
end cleanup
on executeSQL me, Query, CallbackOb, CallbackMethod, OptionalParameters
if RunningQuery then exit -- only allow one query at a time
RunningQuery = True
pCurOperation = [#Query:Query, #OptionalParameters:OptionalParameters, #CallbackOb:CallbackOb, #CallbackMethod:CallbackMethod]
pPingCount = 0
pTimeOb = timeout().new("QueryProcessor_"&me, 1, me, #processQuery) -- creating the timeout object here breaks the call stack, which is good.
end executeSQL
on processQuery me, TimeOb
Result = pDB.executeSQL(pCurOperation.Query, pCurOperation.OptionalParameters)
if Result.errorMsg then
    if Result.errorMsg = 5 then -- database is currently locked
      pPingCount = pPingCount + 1
      if pPingCount = 1 then -- then inform user there will be a delay.
        pAlertBox.setMessage("Waiting for database response.")
        pAlertBox.setProgress(0)
        pAlertBox.show()
        pTimeOb.period = pPingTime
        exit
      end if
      pAlertBox.setProgress((pPingCount * pPingTime / pTimeoutTime) * 100 )
      if pPingCount * pPingTime = pTimeoutTime then -- timed out
        alert("Query Timed out.")
      else
        exit -- try again in pPingTime time.
      end if
    else -- there is some sort of database error
      alert("Database Error: " & return & pDB.explainError(Result.errorMsg))
    end if
else -- no query errors
    call(pCurOperation.CallbackMethod, pCurOperation.CallbackOb, Result)
end if
-- if the code makes it this far then we are done and need to clean things up
if pTimeOb. objectP then
    pTimeOb.forget()
    pTimeOb = void
end if
pAlertBox.hide()
RunningQuery = false
end processQuery
on setTimeOutTime me, MilliSecs
pTimeoutTime = MilliSecs
end setTimeOutTime
on setPingTime me, MilliSecs
pPingTime = MilliSecs
end setPingTime
You then create an instance of this script on preparemovie.
-- Movie script
global gDB
on prepareMovie
gDB = script("Asynchronus SQLite").new()
if gDB.voidP then halt -- can not connect to the database
end
on stopMovie
gDB.cleanup()
end
Then it is simply a matter of sending your queries to the gDB object and it will send the results back to the callback handler and object that you specify. Here's a behavior that shows how simple this should be:
-- Sample DB Behavior
global gDB
on mouseUp me
Query = "select * from users"
gDB.executeSQL(Query, me, #setQueryResult) -- string, callback object, callback handler name
end
on setQueryResult me, Result -- this is the callback handler/method
put Result
end
I also suggest using a MIAW or a LDM or a set of sprites as a way to inform the user of any delays in processing a query. Check the code for pAlertBox to see how I use this idea to update a progress bar. Of course you will have to create the implementation.

Multiple User access in ATP

I am designing custom ATP for our client. Actually, this logic accesses batch classification data and the calculation logic also differs.
The concern that I have is if one user (say A) creates a sales order item and runs a successful Availability check and goes on to create second sales order item. simultaneously if another user (say B) comes to create new sales order item for same material. now the ATP quantity that second user gets should be less than the quantity confirmed by user A. But both the sales order have not been saved. so how do I block the quantities confirmed by A but yet not saved.
Is there any special method for multiple user access at runtime.

Thanks for ur reply. it was really helpful to gain more insights in my issue.
1. For performance-related reasons, the only time when it makes sense to set the material block with quantity transfer is when it is common for several users to work on the same material simultaneously. And in VA01 there are many parallel Sales order creation
2.You create a sales order for a material. During the availability check, this material is blocked. After the availability check is completed, the block is removed. The quantity reserved for this transaction is recorded in the blocking table. This information can be assessed by all others who are working with this material. If you save the order, the blocked entries are cancelled. this how Material block with quantity transfer in SD works.
The concern that I have now is how to get Blocking Tables for transaction VA01.

Multiple users accessing the same data in a global temp table

I have a global temp table (GTT) defined with 'on commit preserve rows'. This table is accessed via a web page using ASP.NET. The application was designed so that every one that accessed the web page could only see their data in the GTT.
We have just realized that the GTT doesn't appear to be empty as new web users use the application. I believe it has something to do with how ASP is connecting to the database. I only see one entry in the V$SESSION view even when multiple users are using the web page. I believe this single V$SESSION entry is causing only one GTT to be available at a time. Each user is inserting into / selecting out of the same GTT and their results are wrong.
I'm the back end Oracle developer at this place and I'm having difficulty translating this issue to the front end ASP team. When this web page is accessed, I need it to start a new session, not reuse an existing session. I want to keep the same connection, but just start a new session... Now I'm losing it.. Like I said, I'm the back end guy and all this web/connection/pooling front end stuff is magic to me.
The GTT isn't going to work unless we get new sessions. How do we do this?
Thanks!

DGS wrote:
I have a global temp table (GTT) defined with 'on commit preserve rows'. This table is accessed via a web page using ASP.NET. The application was designed so that every one that accessed the web page could only see their data in the GTT.
We have just realized that the GTT doesn't appear to be empty as new web users use the application. I believe it has something to do with how ASP is connecting to the database. I only see one entry in the V$SESSION view even when multiple users are using the web page. I believe this single V$SESSION entry is causing only one GTT to be available at a time. Each user is inserting into / selecting out of the same GTT and their results are wrong.
I'm the back end Oracle developer at this place and I'm having difficulty translating this issue to the front end ASP team. When this web page is accessed, I need it to start a new session, not reuse an existing session. I want to keep the same connection, but just start a new session... Now I'm losing it.. Like I said, I'm the back end guy and all this web/connection/pooling front end stuff is magic to me.
The GTT isn't going to work unless we get new sessions. How do we do this?
Thanks!You may want to try changing your GTT to 'ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS' and have the .Net app use a transaction object.
We had a similar problem and I found help in the following thread:
Re: Global temp table problem w/ODP?
All the best.

Time Machine with multiple users on single computer

Hi All,
I have an iMac at home with multiple user log ons. I'm about to get the Time Capsule and start using Time Machine (currently I use backup).
When I switch on Time Machine, does it switch on for all users, or will each user need to turn on Time Machine?
If I have to switch on Time Machine for each user, will each user's time machine back up the entire computer (so I'll have two complete copies on my computer on the external drive)?
If this does occur, can I control what Time Machine backs up so TM only backs up user specific information?
Thanks in advance,
Chris

When you first backup it will backup your whole system (user directories, system directories, applications, etc) unless you specify folders to exclude. When a user account is added to the computer, their home folder will be added to the backup in a similar way to if you added a new application. It will back up the directory structure exactly as it is on your main hard drive. The backup will essentially keep a copy of the whole hard drive on the backup drive.
The Time Machine will either be on for the whole system, or off for the whole system. It is not on or off for a specific user account. Users (depending on if they've got admin privileges) may have control over turning time machine on or off, but this does not change who can access the backups. All users will be able to invoke Time Machine to get to their backed up files.
Time Machine does not make separate backups for individual users. Instead, it preserves the permissions for backed up files, so while every user can access the backups, they cant just browse other users' files on the backup. The same restrictions on the main drive are carried over to the backup. Still, a standard user who's lost a file will be able to go into Time Machine, access a backed up version of the file, and restore it. Unlike standard users who are restricted from seeing other users' files in the backups, Admins are also restricted but they can be authenticated to view other users' files if they want to.

What happens when multiple users access the same servlet?

Do the users share all the same resources? Or is a new process generated for each user? I have a servlet that builds a string to return to the user and I only have myself to test, so I can't really see what happens when many users access the servlet. Is there a possibility that the string will get screwed up, like when dealing with multiple threads, or do all the users get their own resources and I don't have to worry about that?

huh? if you can point a test servlet at it, you can point a browser at it (even if the servlet does not serve html it will run)
try pasting the servlet URL into a web browser
refreshing multiple browsers repeatedly could provide a manual test

How to use multiple projects in single application :)

Hai ,
I ve to use single .portal for accessing multiple projects in a application. if i create two new projects in a application i cant able to use .portlet file of one project to display in another .portal . is there any way to display both the project .portlet files in a single portal. :)

not really.. sorry
Kunal Mittal

Multiple users on single computer

We're helping a church train their volunteers to use
Contribute. In their small computer lab, volunteers will edit their
particular directories/pages. We can easily create keys for each of
them with their specific allowed directories - can multiple users
share a single computer and let us achieve limited access for each
user? How do we set up Contribute or the connection key to demand a
user log-on? This church has no publishing server. Is this
possible?

I don't think so because Contribute does this weird thing
where it stores sftp / ftp information in your registry key
(encrypted) and then regardless of what you enter when it prompts
you to enter that data it still uses whatever was first stored for
that domain in your registry. So if anyone ever opts to "save" the
login information, ever, then it's set until you clear your
registry key chain. (annoying)
It would be possible if you made each computer specific to
role, like all roles that use this computer uses a sftp / ftp
information that is on the same level.
Long story short, you can do this, but it might cause
problems when users don't understand why they can't do things they
normally could do (sftp information was saved as a lower level
user) or a low level access user who has privledges they should not
have (sftp information was saved as a high level user).

Read only / save problem when multiple user accessing PDF

When accessing a PDF-file from a network location (where multiple users might have the file open simultaneously) I have noticed a problem.
First of all you will not get notified when opening the file that it is open elsewhere, there is no "read only" mode in this case.
Secondly (and worse) is the fact that the person having opened the file first is prompted to save it under a new name when she/he is saving changes since "file is open elsewhere".
This works quite the opposite of what most Windows applications do.
Is it a problem in version 7 and 8 of Acrobat only?
I have heard from the support previously that it might be unsupported functionality to use network drives for editing. Is that true?
If you are doing updates after a review but want to share the outcomes of the review this quite annoying...

I agree, and I have seen the same points as well, but...
During the update process after the review many reviewers are looking at their comments and how they were handled during the review meeting and at the same time the authors (yes, for documents such as a requirement specification there will be more than one author) are doing the updates to the original document.
We are also updating the PDF with the changes made by adding new replies to the comments and also changing the status of the comments once more.
The logical approach when opening a file is not to display a text box, but to add the information in the title bar of the program. That way you do not add an extra step to the people who only want "read only" access.

Why does the Error: 500 SC_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR appear when multiple users access my JSPs but does not occur when only one user accesses my JSPs?

When multiple users run my JSP application, why do some users get an Error: 500 SC_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR for certain JSP pages with the error message No such file or directory. The JSP listed on the Error 500 page varies and is not always the same. When only one user runs my JSP application, the problem does not occur?
The database connection is held when the user logs in or accesses certain parts of the JSP and then is immediately released. No connections to the database are held.
We are using Solaris 8 with MU_6 plus recommended patches.
Enterprise Ultra 250
iAS 6 SP 3

Is anything showing up in the KXS or KJS logs?
It sounds like you might having some kind of thread safety issue with your code. Either that or your guess about running out of database connections.

Multiple users accessing entity bean with same PK

Hi,
Some body please clarify the below issue.
(EJB 1.1, WAS3.5)
I have two app servers and two clones each clone is running in each app server.
Stateful session bean access Entity beans to update/read record in the database.
According to my requirement multiple users can access the same entity data (same primary key). Suppose user A created a Stateful session bean SB1 and the SB1 created Entity1 with PK1, this is happening at clone1.
User B accessed the site and the request went to Clone2 and a new SB2 created, but the SB2 need to access the database with Same PK1.
For the above situation, I guess container can not create a new Entity bean with PK1 because EB with PK1 is already there and it tries to allocate same EB1 with SB2, so if two requests are concurrent do the SB2 wait to get the handle of the EB1?
Is there any way to create two Entity beans with same Primary Key at the same time but in different clone?
Thanks,
Sagar

Hi,
The concurrency level has to be set at the level of database and the database will take care of consistency & integrity of the data. So specity the concurrency level on the database connection in each appserver.

Multiple users on single computer mounting same RAID drive

Hi I'm a newbie:)
I have multiple users on a single computer which need to mount the same RAID drive on a different networked computer. I have no problem making the mounts, the only thing is that when each user makes its mount the drive appears multiple times when doing an ls /Volumes. Ie, the first user mounts sparkle and it appears as sparkle. The second user mounts sparkle and it appears as sparkle-1. The third user mounts sparkle and it appears as sparkle-2. In the finder they all show up as just plain sparkle, but for running scripts, the hyphen-# screws things up. Does anyone know of a way to have the same drive mounted without the hyphen-#s?
Many thanks!
Megan

What kind of scripts? I don't think there's any way around the naming problem, but you could use regular expressions. I don't see why sparkle* shouldn't do the trick, or add sparkle-[0-9$] to whatever constuct you have.

MobileMe Gallery - allowing multiple users access

Hi,
I have a simple question - can allow more than one user access to a hidden MobileMe Gallery?
I seem to be able to choose only one name from a drop-down list. I'd like to allow two people access to my gallery. Is this possible?
Thanks,
:-Joe

Joe:
Give the same name and password to both viewers.
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. Just put the application in the Dock and click on it whenever you want to backup the dB file. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.
Note: There's now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

Multiple users accessing single application in HTML DB 2.1 with XE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for