MultiProvider: Different Filters for Different Underlying InfoProviders

Hi Gurus,
I would like to ask if it is possible to set different query filters for different underlying InfoProviders?
For example:
I have Cube A and Cube B. Both are defined and identified in a MultiProvider. I have a query on this MP.
When user enters a key date 12.05.2010, data records from 01.01.2010 - 30.04.2010 should come from Cube A whereas 01.05.2010 - 11.05.2010 from Cube B.
Is this scenario possible?
Thanks,
Meng

Hi Christopher,
thanks for your reply.
I am aware of the prerequisite of common granularity for result into the same ROW. Since in this case I am using structure, so I think I do not have problem with it.
Regarding restricted key figure:
In case you haven't yet learnt it, a restricted key figure is a query in itself. Having two or more restricted key figures is the same as having two queries in your report.
You mentioned that a restricted key figure is itself a query. I have carried out the following test: I restrict 0CALMONTH 04.2011 in the global filter of a query while putting a restricted key figure (Amount 05.2011) with 0CALMONTH 05.2011 in the column section. However, no records are displayed for the column. If a restricted key figure is ANOTHER query on InfoProvider, then I should be able to see records for 05.2011.
Please kindly clear my doubts.
Thanks,
Meng

Similar Messages

My iPhone 4 lock button broke, will Apple fix/replace it for free under the one year warranty?

I've had my iPhone 4 for just under a year now and a couple weeks ago the lock button broke. At first, it was just difficult to press down and now it's just completely stuck. I've been using the assistive touch but it's kind of a hassle. I still have a few days left of my one year warranty, so if I went to the Apple Store would they fix/replace my phone for free or would I have to pay? Also, I was having issues with my speakers previously so I went to get it fixed and they said my phone has water damage and I would need to pay to fix it. Will the water damage effect them fixing my lock button too or is it different? Any advice/guidence is greatly appreciated!

If there is water damage then they will likely conclude that your issues are a result of that and you will have to pay.
But don't ask us, ask them. We're users and this have no idea what Apple will say in your case.

How to create filters for OPENHUB?

hi experts,
how can i create filters for OPENHUB Destination for the below scenario.
Make some kind of u201Clogicu201D to support a filter on an open hub. E.g. only data from month 2011-04 and until today are u201Copen hubu2019edu201D each day and data before 2011-04 must be u201Copen hubu2019ed u201D e.g. each weekend.
The filter on the open hub can be different from open hub to open hub. We must be able, to filter one or more fields from the open hub.
Regards
venuscm

hi this may helpful for you
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a0a5e58d-1117-2d10-13a7-fa10c2cf20d8?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90441228-52a8-2d10-e683-fe4b2d65c331?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
Edited by: Srikanth.T on Nov 24, 2011 10:03 AM

ICWC - define filters for case management 5.0

If I want to limit the Cases linked objects and logs to BP's, sales order, & service tickets are the proper setting.
1. SPRO > interaction center webclient > business transaction > case management > define filters for displaying case detail.
2. Define filter = ZTEST,
enter any heading descriptions 1- 5
Navigation = RecFolderToRecordDetail
3. Assign element types, add entries
CRM_BUSINESS_PARTNER
CRM_SALES_TRANSACTION
CRM_SERVICE_TRANSACTION
Can BOL type, description, path to bol 1, path to bol 2, etc all stay blank? to default to SAP functionality?
4. Define Filter profile = ZTEST1
5. assign filter ZTEST1 = ZTEST
Step #3 is the one I want to be sure I understand. Will rewards points.
6. assign the filter in a different SPRO entry.

I'm guessing zdefault had same description default and it was picking up the default one in error.

Does RoboHelp 11 have the ability to add filters for the search function?

Does Robohelp 11 have the ability to add filters for the search function?

There's a page on my site about ZoomSearch. You can set up Rh to work with that and have a page with links or buttons that bring up different search options.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge

Filters for Virtual Office

Hello we are trying to get Virtual Office to work and are having many
different issues, but one that has cropped up now is filtering. We have a
url called http://vo.domainname.com/vo and we can get the VO office to work
fine when we are inside of the company, however from the outside we receive
the following error message, URL could not be retrieved, time out 110, once
we drop filters however it instantly works.(So this leads Me to believe
filtering is to blame) Another error I have is vo.domainname.com:443, so I
will assume I need two filters for 443 one inbound and one outbound, but if
someone could confrim this, and give a description of the filters I would
be very grateful.
DS

>
> > Thanks Cat, on the outbound one (Filter) would I also need to make sure
> > the ACK bit is checked as well?
>
> no, it's not necessary. Let me know how it goes. You might have other
> issues as well, if this doesn't work.
> --
> Cat
> NSC Volunteer Sysop
Hello Cat;
I wanted to make sure I had the second filter correct as well before I
went out to my customers site,
On the first one you have Packet type TCP 1024-65535 dest port 443
on the second one you have the same thing,
Packet type TCP source port 1024-65535 dest port 443
shouldn't that be turned around for outbound communication to occur? I
will also let you know about the ack bit being checked or not
DS

Multiprovider as Datasource for Open Hub Destination

Hello,
Can you pls let me know if we can used the Multiprovider as datasource for the Open Hub destination. Currently we are Bi7.0 and SP9. I am not able to see the option of Mutiprovider in the template.
Appreciate the input ASAP.
Thanks
Gopal

Multiprovider is not yet supported for Open Hub destination and hence you dont see that option.
As of SAP NetWeaver 2004s SPS 6, the open hub destination has its own maintenance interface and can be connected to the data transfer process as an independent object. As a result, all data transfer process services for the open hub destination can be used. You can now select an open hub destination as a target in a data transfer process. In this way, the data is transformed as are all other BI objects.
In addition to the InfoCube, InfoObject, and DataStore object, you can also use DataSources and InfoSources as templates for the field definitions of the open hub destination.
The open hub destination now has its own tree under Modeling in the Data Warehousing Workbench. This tree is structured by InfoAreas.
<b>Restrictions -</b>
It is not currently possible to use MultiProviders as the source for the open hub destination.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/7c836c907c7103e10000000a1553f7/content.htm
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

My ipod nano 6th gen fell out of my pockey and the screen cracked badly, is there any coverage for this under warranty? I just bought it a month ago. If not what are the options for getting it fixed

My ipod nano 6th gen fell out of my pocket and the screen cracked badly, is there any coverage for this under warranty? I just bought it a month ago. If not what are the options for getting it fixed? It is pretty frustrating, it fell from about 3 feet out of my pocket and now looks like it was beaten by a hammer.

Debbie:
deborahfromwindsor wrote:
he advises restarting by inserting the OSX disc and pressing down the C button to reboot from there then selecting disk utility, hard disk and repair.... Does he mean me to hold down the C key on the alpha keyboard or the ctrl key?
Should I just ask for my money back??? If it is a simple repair do I just literally push the disc in, push the power button and hold down the C button?
That's where I would begin, too, with
Repair Disk
Insert Installer disk and Restart, holding down the "C" key until grey Apple appears.
Go to Installer menu (Panther and earlier) or Utilities menu (Tiger) and launch Disk Utility.
Select your HDD (manufacturer ID) in the left panel.
Select First Aid in the Main panel.
(Check S.M.A.R.TStatus of HDD at the bottom of right panel, and report if it saysanything but Verified)
Click Repair Disk on the bottom right.
If DU reports disk does not need repairs quit DU and restart.
If DU reports errors Repair again and again until DU reports disk is repaired.
If DU reports errors it cannot repair you will need touse autility like TechTool Pro,Drive Geniusor DiskWarrior
First we need to determine if the issue you are experiencing with the computer is software or hardware based. Once we have gotten things sorted out there should be time enough to make you decision about keeping or returning it.
cornelius

I have 2 Apple IDs. How can I move all my purchased (paid-for) apps under only 1 of my Apple IDs?

Long ago I bought several, relatively expensive, apps under a old Apple ID.
I then purchased many more paid-for apps under a new Apple ID.
I was unaware that the purchased apps are tied to the Apple ID which I happen to be logged in with, at the time of the purchase: I thought they'd be tied to my authorised PC(s).
Now I'm absolutely sick of having to constantly switch between IDs, even just to CHECK for updates.
What I want to do is move all the paid-for apps which I bought under the old Apple ID to the new Apple ID. Both ID demonstrably belong to me.
Having all my apps under 1 only Apple ID would allow me to update them easily, and no longer be FORCED to switch IDs all the time.
In short I want to use only 1 Apple ID for the future.
If the Apple Store locks the apps to the Apple ID (as it does) instead than to the authorised PC (as it should do), then it should also PREVENT a user from creating a second Apple ID (at least, from the same iTunes installation on the same PC!), or at the very least display a HUGE warning that any paid-for apps purchased under another, older Apple ID will be unavailable under the new Apple ID! The apple Store, and iTunes, do neither thing,
Then the Apple Store and iTunes should at the very least allow a user to put all apps under the same Apple ID!
After all, the Apple Store and iTunes on my PC and iTunes on my Iphone can all "see" that I own TWO legitimate Apple IDs (with purchases and updates): it must be possible to move these apps from one ID to the another ID, at least once! They're MY OWN purchases, paid: can I manage them a bit easier?
Marco

No, it seems you don't (want to) understand. I see 2 things very wrong with your explanation.
1. The move would only need to happen between "accounts" demonstrably and legitimately belonging to the same user. In fact, I'm still using both the old one (for updates only, no new purchases) and the new one (updates and purchases -- actually no morep urchases until Apple solves this). And unless I'm mistaken, I can already have my apps on more than one iDevice at the time: eg. on 1 iPhone and1 iPad. I don't ask for apps to be moved between unrelated accounts: only between accounts belonging to the same "person". And I do not see how changing what is effectively just a "label" embedded in the binary files residing on my hard disk (or in the cloud), which can be verified as legitimately belonging to me thru two ID registered on the same authorised PC could possibly allow anyone to cheat the system. The apps' files have embedded an old label before, and a new label after the operation, both belonging to me, associated to my payment details. That's not rocket science.
In fact, both my Apple ID were at some point linked to the same credit card. And in fact, I only created a second one because at some point I managed to forget my Hotmail EMAIL password, not my Apple STORE password!
The two passwords needn't be the same, adding to the confusion. For months I used that account to buy apps, and never checked the email, since I was not interested in marketing from Apple, and I could see the payments from my credit card statements: that's how I forgot my Hotmail EMAIL password for that Hotmail email address.
Since Microsoft wouldn't allow me to access my Hotmail account anymore (and rightly so, becuase I managed to exhaust all possibilities, and even forgot the security question), and so I could not check my Apple Store emails, I then decided to create a new account, this time with a Live! email address, and this time I used the same password for both the Live! EMAIL and the Apple STORE authentication.
For more than TWO years I used the old Hotmail Apple ID to get updates, without during all that time being able to read the email or access that Hotmail account: this should tell you how stupid this system is! And for the same time, and until last month (I no longer buy anything), I used the new ID for both NEW purchases and their updates.
Now after getting both a new iPhone (only because the old one was unfortunately stolen on my holiday) and a new PC, i NO longer want to be forced to use both IDs, which forces me to constantly switch between them, and also carries the risk that I inadvertently purchase something with the old one, to which EMAIL address I no longer have access: so I can't even check invoices. But most of all, I don't want to be inconvenienced like this by Apple.
Since the Apple ID is such an important concept, forever ID tied to your purchases, it should NOT be an email address, which are disposable by their own nature. When creating it, one is naturally driven to think it'll only be needed to check Apple Store's emails and newsletters and the such. Why should people be forced to FOREVER use an email address, perhaps linked to a job or relationship they had years earlier, to update their purchases?
The thing is, Apple made the Apple IDs as email addresses simply to ensure that as many people as possible can at any time buy as many apps and songs as possible: just create a new Apple ID: after all, it is (seems) just an email address! and you're done. But they DON'T telly you they'll tie FOREVER your purchases to it. So you're reasonably entitled to think they'll tie them to your payments details, until you discover otherwise the hard way.
And since most Apple users feel humbled by Apple (the "genial" idea of calling "Genius" the support guys at the stores, wo usually don't have a clue on anyhting less than trivial, is part of this) and fear of feeling "stupid" for getting wrong soemthing with what are supposed to be the most user-friendly company and products, they will simply buy the apps again under the new ID, bringing more profits to Apple. This also can't be casual.
My apps are available, under both Apple IDs at the same time, to iTunes: be it on my PC on in the iCloud. The same mechanism that physically "embeds" that Apple ID in the app file when I first buy it, can surely be used to change it afterwards. It's just a matter of willing to do so. This content (apps, songs, etc) may be digital (that is, files) rather than traditional (eg. books), but I assure you that the disk blocks taken by the app or song files in the iTunes directory on my PC or in the iCloud are as physical as a book or a mp3 player: they CAN be changed in a perfectly safe and trackable way, without risk of cheating. Ever heard of MAC addresses? Or other unique info that can easily be gathered from the PC's operating system or BIOS? or credit card details, already available?
2. The policy of inconveniencing (punishing) the huge majority of users (citizens) to prevent a tiny minority from misbehaving can be good for sheep, but not for rational people. It's typical of unimaginative, monopolistic companies (oppressive governments), not of progressive, modern and innovative ones. The cost of protecting their proficts from those who would steal from them is theirs (the company's), not ours (the users'). They should be more creative and inventive, in finding solutions to stop 10 people who would misuse their system, rather than annoying the 10 million who won't. I would never do so (mostly because I thing it's morally wrong, but also because I can't be bothered), but I understand why people invent ways to circumvent this gratuituos, bullish constraints.
Also, CAN'T you REALLY see the difference between these TWO options:
- allowing a user to change an app's associated account ONCE IN A LIFETIME, even only ONCE per app
- FORCING a user to switch Apple IDs EVERY TIME (DAY, OR WEEK) FOREVER, to check and/or update
??? Am I talking to a person, or to a robot, or to a undercover Apple employee here?
Both things are possible. The second is more convenient financially for Apple, that's all.
But it's also so clearly unfair to their customers. No more, thanks.
To finish, many if not almost all of the issues in threads like https://discussions.apple.com/message/18954743#18954743 (like husband and wife sharing a PC with two iPhones, or kids' gifts, etc) really boil down to this issue, despite being often complicated by sloppy explanation (when they say "password" , do they mean the Apple ID's or the Email account's?, and so on) and unreasonable requests (like having the same app, only paid once, available under two IDs, even if on the same PC: this is not what I ask, and it's unreasonable) -- and could be solved by the concept of a "master" ID and "secondary" ID: if you read well, the real issue is almost always for everybody having to switch between "old" (or "wife's", "kids'") and new (or "husband's", "dad's") Apple IDs: and this must be done on BOTH the iTunes application on the PC or Mac, and on the devices themselves.

How to apply filters for union all report in OBIEE 11g

Hi All
Can we apply saved filters to union reports in obiee 11g?
I am able to apply saved filters for normal reports but not for union reports.
The catalog pane is blank, when i click on result columns or each criteria.
The only option i see is to manually create the filters for each criteria, dont i have any choice to use a saved filter for union report?
Is this a bug or something i am unaware. Please guide me
Thanks

Hi manu,
Filter is created based on subject area.we can't use save filter in any other subject areas.
now we can use new filter for union reports.
if Helps please mark as correct.. :)

Down payments request for Asset Under Construction

Hello Expert
while Down Payment request to vendors - for Asset Under Construction, system showing error.
Contact your system administrator (table error)
Message no. AA866
Diagnosis
No account has been entered for posting down payments in area 01 under the account assignment key IN95 (chart of accounts YAIN).
Procedure
Enter the account using the Customizing menu.
Pls Reply frinds.
regards,
Riten patel

Dear:
First check in OAYB that have AUC class been specified for down payments and then go to transaction AO90 and maintain the GL account for depreciation are 01 under the Balance Sheet account in the field Acquisition: Down Payment. It will resolve your issue.
Regards

Down payments for Asset Under Construction

Hi Experts,
Urgent!
My client paying advances to vendors, thru TC-F-48.
Previously there is no PO requirement ,now asper client requirement I put PO fild as requirement in posting key 29.
1)There is no problem for payment to vendors -for Raw materials.
2)while paying advance to vendors - for Asset Under Construction, system showing error.
*Error is:
Contact your system administrator (table error)
Message no. AA866
Diagnosis
No account has been entered for posting down payments in area 01 under the account assignment key 4800 (chart of accounts FTL).
Procedure
Enter the account using the Customizing menu.
Pls Reply frinds.
Regards
vinod

Hi Vinod,
I hope that you are following Valuated goods receipt concept.
Valuated goods receipt: Asset will be debited at the time of goods receipt
Non valuated good receipt: Asset will be debited at the time of invoice receipt
If you follow valuated goods receipt concept, then at the time of making down payment, AUC should not be debited (whatever the value date/ capitalization date be). Please refer SAP note number 310368 (valuated goods receipt paragraph) for reference. In that they have clearly mentioned the steps to make down payment against asset under construction Purchase Order without debiting to AUC and without any error message. You have to make F5 378 message number from error message to warning message and in posting key 29 and 39, you have to supress the asset related fields. If you have done the above settings, then system will not show any error message to update G/L account in AO90 transaction code for the Acquisition: down payments and Down payment clearing - 2nd and 4th field or for AUC related fields.
Hope this helps. Assign points if useful.
Regards
Dwarak.

Providing sorting filters for a table in webdynpro java application

ho to provide sorting , filters , for a table in webdynpro java application .

Hi Pradeep,
Please go through the following article on implementation of filtering and sorting:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f024364b-3086-2b10-b2be-c0ed7d33fe65
The article contains a link to a sample application using the TableSorter and TableFilter Class.
The same classes can be used by any other web dynpro application. Download the sample application and copy the classes. In case of a specific requirement, modify the TableSorter and TableFilter classes.
Regards,
Kartikaye

Gl a/c for overpayment/under payment

hi
what is gl account for overpayment /under payment.
it is expense or income a/c
thank u
shusma

there is nothing like overpayment/underpayment ledger account.
If any excess payment made it should be treated as advance payment and underpayment as payable amount.
Considering expense/income...This is purely depends on transaction type.
Vijay

Internet Filtering for iPod Touch

I have a 12 year old boy that just got an iPod touch for his birthday. Is there anything anyone can reccomend to filter the internet ie. Net Nanny? Thank you!

Maybe try turning off safari on restrictions and then installing k9 interent browser app, they're a internet filter, the app allows access to the internet with thier standard setting of filtering for the internet browser. Its quite good, its free, however you cant customize what it blocks from being seen when you browse the interent.
https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/k9-web-protection-browser/id407657840?mt=8

MultiProvider: Different Filters for Different Underlying InfoProviders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for