MySQL 5.0.27-max xserve g5 dual run very slow

Hi to all,
I have a very strange problem on my dual G5 xserve running php and mysql5.
I upgrated from mysql 4.01 to mysql 5 5.0.27 and now my server is very slow during queries.
My CPU is always used at 45% by MySQL and I have not too much connections or users at the same time.
I found this link: http://www.shawnhogan.com/2005/10/mysql-problems-on-mac-os-x-server.html that explain something about mysql 5 on xserve.
Is very strange if I reboot mysql it runs normally but after some queries it returns slow again...
Anyone has some idea?
Thank you all
Yorh

I've actually tried all the USB ports and get same results. I went and bought a Sonnet USB2.0 high speed PCI adapter thinking a dedicated controller would help. It was actually slower than the onboard USB2.0 ports. Again, this same drive hooked up to my Windows XP computer performs about 4 times faster.
At this point I've purchased an external SATA card from Sonnet, the Tempo X eSATA 4x4 card. As soon as I get an eSATA cable this sould prove to be a lot better.
I'd sitll like to know if other people get similar poor performance on USB2.0 external drives vs Firewire 400 on the same computer. I stopped buying FW enclosures when it seemed Apple was abandoning firewire on their ipods and there is no Firewire 800 on the macbook pro or intel iMacs.

Similar Messages

  • Firefox maxing my cpu and runs VERY slow i have reset firefox and re installed it, diddnt work

    firefox maxing my cpu and runs VERY slow i have reset firefox and re installed it, diddnt work i have googles searched about it and tryed so manny things to fix it but nothing works this is my last idea posting here

    Did you do a clean reinstall and deleted the Firefox program folder?
    *(32 bit Windows) C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\
    *(64 bit Windows) C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox\
    Try to boot the computer in Windows Safe mode with network support (press F8 on the boot screen) as a test to see if that helps.
    Create a new profile as a test to check if your current profile is causing the problems.
    See "Creating a profile":
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/profile-manager-create-and-remove-firefox-profiles
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Profile_issues
    If the new profile works then you can transfer some files from an existing profile to the new profile, but be careful not to copy corrupted files.
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox

  • HT1338 XSERVE 10.6.8 is running very slow, and Workgroup Manager is not responding

    XSERVE 10.6.8 is running very slow, and Workgroup Manager is not responding. There is no more updates to download.

    munish khanna wrote:
    1. upgrade to lion, which should over write previous software and the reasons for it being slow.
    No, you don't want to upgrade over a buggy system, Lion has issues of it's own that will only complicate matters, plus Lion is slower than Snow Leopard.
    Learn all the pitfalls before you upgrade to Lion, like all your Rosetta/older programs will no longer work and more.
    Leave Lion for a new hardware purchase is my advice, it's still got plenty of security and other issues.
    For your performance, your likely better off replacing the hard drive with a 7,200 RPM model and maxing the RAM, download the free MacTracker to find out your specs, and OtherWorld Computing is good for videos, tools and parts.
    http://eshop.macsales.com/installvideos/
    2. Format the hard disc and reinstall snow leopard.
    That will work, provided your data is off the machine first.
    Now how do i reinstall snow leopard as it was an online purchased upgrade from leopard.
    The 10.6 Snow Leopard disk that you upgraded 10.5 Leopard from actually has the full OS X 10.6 on it.
    All you have to do is stick the disk in and hold the c key down while booting, use Disk Utility to erase the entire drive, quit and install 10.6.
    Of course your not going to get the free iLife that came with the 10.5 grey disks, see if you can first install 10.5 with the same methods, then setup with the same user name as before, then upgrade to 10.6
    I think Apple nulled booting off the 10.5 disks, but it won't hurt to try.
    Another method would be to install 10.6 fresh by itself, then use the program called Pacifist to extract iLife from the 10.5 disks.
    http://www.charlessoft.com/
    Read here for plenty of how to's
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/16276201#16276201

  • Mail, Server Admin, MySQL running very, very slow

    Hi all,
    I have this Leopard Server on a Mac Mini and I experience some big bottlenecks on mail services (especially webmail), Server Admin connections (both local and remote), and also connections with mySQL clients (remote). Local MySQL is working fine. It is not the same for mail and Server Admin. They are very slow also for local connections. Any idea? Hint: I'm using a USB-ethernet adapter (from Apple) for my public IP's (I have 2 of them) and I use built-in ethernet for local network. I've switched them, I tried only with the built-in ethernet... no change. Please help... my enthusiasm about this server solution is getting lower and lower... Thank you very much

    pterobyte wrote:
    Have a look at system.log and mailaccess.log for clues to begin with.
    Server Admin is usually slow (locally and remotely) when the DNS (forward and reverse) setup is not correct.
    Since mySQL seems to have only problems when used remotely, I'd look at bandwidth, routers and switches involved.
    Is mail only slow when used via webmail or via any IMAP client?
    You're a genius as usually
    It seems that I removed my reverse zone accidentally... I didn't even think to look at DNS setting before you told me... Thank you very much

  • Same select max is very slow in one program but fast in another

    Hi,
    I have a report that becomes very slow these few months. I used SQL trace for the report and found out its these codes that slow down the report:
    SELECT MAX( mkpf~budat )
                  FROM mkpf
        INNER JOIN mseg
                       ON mseg~mblnr = mkpf~mblnr AND mseg~mjahr = mkpf~mjahr
                    INTO posting_date
               WHERE mseg~werks  = w_matl-batch_reservations-werks
                     AND mseg~charg  = w_matl-batch_reservations-charg
                     AND mseg~bwart  IN ('261', 'Z61').
    The thing is these codes have been used in different system, DEV, QAS, and PRD. But only in PRD it is very slow, other systems are pretty fast.
    I even created a local copy of that report in PRD, with the same code. The local file runs fast and perfectly. But the original code is just slow.
    Just wondering if anybody met this problem too? any ideas??

    Hi Liu,
    Index creation is not a advisable solution.Please follow the existing indexes by adding Mandt field.
    Try like this
    SELECT MAX( mkpf~budat )
                  FROM mkpf
        INNER JOIN mseg
                       ON mseg~mblnr = mkpf~mblnr AND mseg~mjahr = mkpf~mjahr
                    INTO posting_date
               WHERE mseg~mandt = sy-mandt
                      AND mkpf~mandt = sy-mandt
                      AND mseg~werks  = w_matl-batch_reservations-werks
                     AND mseg~charg  = w_matl-batch_reservations-charg
                     AND mseg~bwart  IN ('261', 'Z61').
    Hope it will be helpful.
    Regards,
    Kannan

  • Hi, i'm Architec and my basic programs are: Autodesk Architecture and 3D studio Max. Can i run it in the MacBook Pro 13.3-Inch  (NEWEST VERSION) Thanks!!!

    Hi, i'm Architec and my basic programs are: Autodesk Architecture and 3D studio Max. Can i run it in the MacBook Pro 13.3-Inch  (NEWEST VERSION) Thanks!!!

    You can but make sure you upgrade your RAM to 16GB - you can't do that through Apple...
    Autodesk is a memory intensive program and the same goes with 3D Studio Max.....
    Another suggeston if you must use a 13 inch is to buy the base 13 inch Macbook Pro and upgrade the RAM to 16GB and install a SSD to make it perform fast.
    Another option is to get a refurbished 15 Inch Macbook Pro and do the RAM upgrade yourself...Advantage going 15 Inch is because it has it's own discrete graphics adapter rather than the built in Intel video.

  • G5 Dual - DVD Reader has gone very very slow after Leopard

    After 1 Migrate install and 1 clean install, I notice that reinstalling apps is taking 4/5 times as long as they should it's as if my DVD Reader has gone very very slow. I thought at first it was the migration that had caused FCPS2 to reinstall slow.
    (Sony DVD RW AW-G170A 4 months old) on G5 Dual 2's)
    FCPS2 wanted 19-hrs to install, I waited 6 hrs and then gave up. Luckily or unluckily as the case may be I used the time install Leo on my other Macs.
    In the end I have installed Apps over the Firewire network connected to my other G5 Dual with the stock DVD drive, they are installing fast now.

    Some more info about my setup:
    *Simultaneous Dual band AEBS:*
    Radio Mode: 802.11n only (5 GHz) - 802.11b/g
    Radio Channel Selection: Manual - 161 (5GHz), 6(2.4GHz)
    *Airport Express:*
    Wireless mode: Extend a wireless network
    Allow wireless clients checked under the name of the network (same as for AEBS).
    Both are WPA/WPA2 Personal security. And both the routers were upgraded to 7.4.2 firmware this morning with the hope that it will help.
    *N Devices (both working fine):*
    Apple TV 40GB
    2009 Model Mac Mini upgraded to Snow Leopard - working perfectly.
    *G Devices:*
    Thinkpad running WinXP
    Dell Laptop running WinXP
    Acer Netbook running WinXP
    iPod Touch
    iPhone 3G
    Linksys webcam
    _All of the above are working fine_.
    +2008 model Mac mini -+ upgrade to Snow Leopard shows extremely slow wifi connection that it is unusable. It takes 20min to load apple homepage. When I boot from the clone of my Leopard lying on my external drive, it works perfectly.
    I compared the settings between all the tabs of Network-->Airport-->Advanced and they are identical between Snow Leopard and Leopard mode except that SL doesn't have the "Apple Talk" tab.
    Appreciate any help to debug this.

  • G5 dual/1.8GHZ slow when switching users and starting mail, opening files

    I have 20' imac dual cpu G5/1.8ghz/1gig/250gig drive with 10.4.11.
    It is much slower than the G5 it replaced. Symptoms include: very slow when switching to another user desk tops, opening up the hard drive for the first time once you get there, opening entourage or mail for the first time; lots of beach balls.
    The drive has more than half the space left, we don't have many applications running, our iphoto and itunes libraries are under 20 gig combined. I ran the disk utility and cleaned up permissions. We typically leave the mac on all the time but restart occasionally.
    Any ideas?

    We'll let you in because you used to have a G5 iMac , but you really should post on the dual page. Anyway, have you cleaned your caches in the browser you use? You can use OnyX to clean all the caches. Make sure you empty the trash in all your user accounts as well. Try resetting the PRAM too.
    Hope some of this helps,

  • Xserve G4 Dual 1.3GHz PCI Options?

    I just picked up a Dual 1.3GHz G4 Xserve. I was wondering what my PCI options are. I was looking for what exact video cards work. So far I have only came up with the ATI8500 I believe. Is there any SATA cards that work to add external storage? Any info is helpful. I will be running 10.4 server on it with 4 180GB drives.

    I had a similar problem when I received my xServe. My xServe is a slightly older xServe (1 GB, Dual), but the video cards should work the same in both servers.
    I looked at the ATI 8500, but it was too expensive.
    Look on eBay for an ATI 7000
    I purchased one at a reasonable price. It works great, although not very powerful. It supports most basic resolutions which is fine for a server. This hardware was never designed for great video and the bus is no way near the performance you would get on a G5 desktop.
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8815758623&ru=http://search.e bay.com:80/8815758623_W0QQfromZR40QQfviZ1
    MacBook Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  
    I also looked into SATA to try and get away from ATA. Stay with the ATA as the cards are really expensive (MetaRAID cards) and the performance on the ATA cards is good and marginally slower than a SATA. They already have (hotswap thanks to Apple), but it is kind of flakey.
    If you want external, go firewire 400. You have two ports on the xServe and firewire is much easier (and faster) with OSX than USB. You can get some pretty big firewire drives from Maxtor now, some with built in RAID 0 or RAID 1.
    Otherwise, buy up a bunch of older drive holders and add the standard ATA drives when needed.
    MacBook Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

  • SRST/CME max-dn and dual-line confirmation

    Hi,
    Can I please confirm the following:
    If my router supports max-dn of 960 and all of my handsets are registered as dual-line does this actually mean my max-dn is only really 480 as there would be a 'virtual port' to allow the extra channel for phone lines?
    If this is the case can I force VG224 SCCP configured endpoints to register as single line only.
    Thanks
    Heath

    if we maxed out the the ephones and DNs according to what the platform allows, could it greatly impact the performance of the router upon provisioning?

  • Xserve G5 Dual 2.3 GHz G5

    Im looking to purchase a xserve G5 2.3 Dual what hard drive will the bays take a SATA drive ? if so what capacity /

    The XServe G5 does, indeed, have SATA drive bays. Typically you're limited to the drive options that Apple provide in their Apple Drive Modules (ADM - the drive trays that incorporate the drive interface to the internal bus). Some people have reported success in replacing the drive in an ADM with a larger one (I've heard of up to 1TB), but you're on your own (especially as far as sourcing empty Apple Drive Modules you can add drives to).

  • I just bought a 2006 Intel Xserve (2x2GHz dual core)...

    .... which I would plan to use for work in a stand alone mode. It only has one 80Gb drive, and two blank slots. What are the possabilities for creating a raid array with three drives? I'm more concerned about data security. I have Leopard server OS. As ever, budget is tight

    What kind of RAID did you want to create? Creating a RAID0 across all three drives will hurt rather than help your data security and while a RAID1 across two drives makes some sense I think RAID1 across three drives is a little silly. I usually RAID1 two of the drives and install the system on that partition and leave the third drive for data storage. That gives you separation of data and system but gives you a second system drive to boot from if the other system drive kicks out.
    To create a RAID5 across the three internal drives you'll need hardware like an internal RAID card as well as the drives and if your budget is tight it might be a stretch, but that's up to you.  If you run RAID5 without a hot spare you're fooling yourself if you don't have a "cold spare" on the shelf at all times. This will also only give you 2 drives worth of storage space (RAID5 is n-1 storage) which makes it more expensive per byte.
    As always RAID is not back-up - that is a separate issue. Different RAID schemes protect your data in different ways. Mirroring doesn't protect you from file deletion, failed updates etc. and RAID5 will protect you against the lose of a _single drive_ but not more. So it depends on what you want and you're willing to/can spend.
    My $.02,
    =Tod

  • Can't I stop the HOG Flash from Firefox? I use FlashBlock but a constant fight. Often both cores maxed at 100%,laptop very slow until I kill Flash in Tsk Mangr

    Flash is the problem. It often maxes both cores of my dual core processor and brings processing virtually to a halt.
    Originally, I killed flash in Task Manager whenever i heard my fan come on and also noticed slow system response. This was very distracting and took a lot of time.
    Then I installed FlashBlock, but it doesn't stop Flash unless you tell it for each and every website.
    When reading news, and opening a link, I will hear the fan start, so i click the block button/icon in Firefox to block the site from using flash. Some sites don't launch with the FlashBlock icon. I have to use the manual kill option for them. This extremely frustrating. I understand why Steve Jobs hated Flash.
    I don't like Apple's money-sucking wallet-leach behavior, so I use WinTel and live with the frustrations of which this is the biggest. HTML5 supposedly is the solution, but site builders use flash.
    FireFox needs a flash control switch built in the browser to give control of Flash - block/ask, etc. functionality.

    By the way, Firefox does have a Click-to-Play feature you can use for Flash. That will delay Flash from starting on a page until you approve it. However, the approval is per site, I believe, so you may need an add-on to control it per page.
    To set "Ask to Activate", open the Add-ons page using either:
    * Ctrl+Shift+a
    * orange Firefox button (or Tools menu) > Add-ons
    In the left column, click Plugins. Look for "Shockwave Flash" and change "Always Activate" to "Ask to Activate".
    When you visit a site that wants to use the Flash, you should see a notification icon in the address bar and one of the following: a link in a black rectangle in the page or an infobar sliding down between the toolbar area and the page.
    Not a solution, but hopefully will help a bit.

  • Very slow Time Machine Initial Backup to Leopard Server on Xserve with RAID

    I'm having trouble backing up my iMac to my Xserve running leopard with dual drobos as my time machine drives
    So here is the setup:
    Server: Xserve (dual quad 2.8 xeons) backing up to Drobo array with 4x1tb drives running (dual drobos on server) fully patched 10.5 server with 16gb/RAM (showing 8gb free)
    Network: 1gbs via catalyst switches on essentially unloaded segment (a couple of folks reading emails)
    Source Machine: iMac 24" 3.06 Core2Duo with 8gb RAM
    Most important fact: nothing has changed on the server (other than usual updates)
    Doing an initial backup of the iMac over the network, and getting peak of about 100Kb/sec, and much of the time it seems to have stalled. Given that the machine has like 230GB to backup, this is going to take a real long while. When I query activity monitor on both the client and Xserve, they are both virtually idle with all resources free (lots of free RAM/Disk/CPU). Neither machine is running any apps right now during the test (other than filesharing, but nobody is using as the office is empty today)
    Now one thing to note is the staggering number of files (iPhoto library is ~120gb and holds over 500,000 files [faces?]) giving a total of 1.2M files.
    As a point of testing, copied a 500mb quicktime movie to same partition, took <5 seconds.

    Should I be concerned that the TimeMachineBuddy widget is producing tons of error messages in the system console (and doesn't seem to work)
    8/4/09 3:34:01 PM [0x0-0xb00b].com.apple.dock[233] 2009-08-04 15:34:01.438 DashboardClient[381:10b] com.bluedog.tmwidget.TimeMachine: ERROR: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma
    8/4/09 3:34:01 PM [0x0-0xb00b].com.apple.dock[233] 2009-08-04 15:34:01.439 DashboardClient[381:10b] (com.bluedog.tmwidget.TimeMachine) file:///Users/henryhbk/Library/Widgets/Time%20Machine%20Buddy.wdgt/Utilities.js: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma (line: 33)
    8/4/09 3:34:02 PM [0x0-0xb00b].com.apple.dock[233] 2009-08-04 15:34:02.359 DashboardClient[381:10b] com.bluedog.tmwidget.TimeMachine: ERROR: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma
    8/4/09 3:34:02 PM [0x0-0xb00b].com.apple.dock[233] 2009-08-04 15:34:02.360 DashboardClient[381:10b] (com.bluedog.tmwidget.TimeMachine) file:///Users/henryhbk/Library/Widgets/Time%20Machine%20Buddy.wdgt/Utilities.js: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma (line: 33)
    8/4/09 3:34:02 PM [0x0-0xb00b].com.apple.dock[233] 2009-08-04 15:34:02.620 DashboardClient[381:10b] com.bluedog.tmwidget.TimeMachine: ERROR: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma
    8/4/09 3:34:02 PM [0x0-0xb00b].com.apple.dock[233] 2009-08-04 15:34:02.621 DashboardClient[381:10b] (com.bluedog.tmwidget.TimeMachine) file:///Users/henryhbk/Library/Widgets/Time%20Machine%20Buddy.wdgt/Utilities.js: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma (line: 33)
    8/4/09 3:34:02 PM [0x0-0xb00b].com.apple.dock[233] 2009-08-04 15:34:02.885 DashboardClient[381:10b] com.bluedog.tmwidget.TimeMachine: ERROR: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma
    8/4/09 3:34:02 PM [0x0-0xb00b].com.apple.dock[233] 2009-08-04 15:34:02.885 DashboardClient[381:10b] (com.bluedog.tmwidget.TimeMachine) file:///Users/henryhbk/Library/Widgets/Time%20Machine%20Buddy.wdgt/Utilities.js: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma: Unrecognized message format: Aug 4 14:31:01 Henry-Feldma (line: 33)

  • Xserve RAID, xfs, linux, and VERY slow deletes

    Greetings,
    We're running a linux box with kernel 2.6.22-2-amd64 on dual AMD Opteron Processors with 8G ram. We have two xserve raids mounted on this box: one with 4.1T (called gala) and another with 1.9T (called apple). We serve these disks to other boxen via nfs.
    I have a series of large files (about 5G each) that I want to delete from the disk apple. I ssh to the machine to which the disks are attached (ie not via nfs). I change into the directory where the disk is mounted and sudo rm -rf *.gz. The first cpu on the box goes to 100% and it takes something like 15 minutes to delete EACH 5G file.
    I've googled around but found no solution as to why this is hapening or what I can do about it.
    The disk is mounted with no options:
    /dev/sdd1 on /storage/disks/apple type xfs (rw)
    Can someone help?
    Thanks!

    The depth of this directory is 1. That is:
    dir$ ls -1
    bigfile1.gz
    bigfine2.gz
    dir$
    There are no subdirectories.
    dir$ rm bigfile1.gz
    takes about 10 minutes where bigfile1.gz is about 5GB in size.
    I have not done the math to decide if the time is proportional to size because I wasn't sure how xfs deals with sparse files.
    Thanks for any help anybody can provide.
    Chad Matsalla

Maybe you are looking for

  • New to the Smartphone world! Help!!

    I just got a Vortex, and I've been downloading a few apps. What is the difference between using the 3G or using the wireless? The guy at the store confused the heck out of me! Can some one dumb it down for me?

  • I need to locate my missing Droid Turbo!!

    I misplaced/lost my Droid Turbo Today and very quickly (probably too quickly) switched to my old back up phone (LG Vortex). I have the Clean Master app and a couple of others i'm not sure of the names of right now that can give me the phones location

  • In which way i can know that a job is running In background or foreground?

    Hi,    In which way i can know that a job is running In background or foreground? please tell me... or a report is in background or foreground.. Thanks , Arya

  • Sharing Data segment

    How is it possible to share the data segment between main thread and the child thread? public class Share2 extends Thread{ static int Data=10; public void run ( ) { Data=Data+10; System.out.println("Data="+Data); public static void main (String[ ] ar

  • ZCM 11.2 reporting server won't install

    Hello, A couple months ago I upgraded to ZCM 11.2 (from 11.0) on SLES 11 SP1. Now I am attempting to upgrade the reporting server. I initially ran the install (setup.sh) and it told me ZRS was alrady installed. So I ran zrsuninstall.sh and that took