NAP- Settings required on Cisco switches- 802.1X

Hi All,
We have to provide access control for users using NAP and Cisco 2960s switches.
The request is to have only domain users authenticate to the operations vlan, non domain users will be assigned to a guest network.
What would be the configs on the switch to allow this config to work? What will force the switch port to assign to the operations vlan when authenticated to the domain?
Thanks much

Hi,
I suppsoe you are using ACS 4.x version.
you need to config dot1x under the switchport. use the default VLAN as the guest VLAN.
You need to configure the ACS to allow access to domain users only (by forcing MACHINE authentication with PEAP for example).
In the NAP, you need to match the NAP selection on the NAS-IP-Address of the switch so that this NAP is only selected if this switch sends the request.
Now, inside the NAP you have to allow only PEAP-MSCHAPv2. (you already forced machine authenticaiton with PEAP from under external DB config already as per earlier step).
When auth works, from under the user/or group, send the attributes to assign a specific VLAN to the user.
Otherwise, if the user auth is not successful it will be put in the default vlan which is the guest vlan.
with ACS 5.x version, doing this is more flexible.
HTH
Amjad
Rating useful replies is more useful than saying "Thank you"

Similar Messages

3com and cisco switches (802.1q)vlan integration problem - broadcast storm?

Hi forum,
we are using 3com switches, the 3com switches implement open vlans, which mean if an ieee 802.1q packet is received at a port and the port is not a member of that vlan, the switch does not perform vlan filtering. if the address is previously learned, it will be forwarded correctly, but if it is not, it will be flooded to all ports within that VLAN.
my questions:
1) if another cisco switch connected with the 3com switch are placed in the same vlan, and the 3com switch received a 802.1q packet from a rogue device, it will be flooded to all the ports(including the cisco ports) within that VLANs, will it cause a broadcast storm?
2) how do i configure the cisco switch to filter off unknown tagged packet on a port? by using vlan prunning?
3) how do i blocked the broadcast from the 3com switches? using broadcast suppression?
4) is there a way on the design side to effectly counter this problem?
Kind regards,
paul

It sounds like setup of your 3com switch is not quite up to your requirements. If a port is declared as tagged, it's ok to receive tagged frames for VLAN's that were not previously known on this port. However if your policy requires that only specific VLAN's are permitted on given tagged port, then you need to add some extra command on your 3com switch. Check with documentation and possibly with your 3com support partner.
As for cisco routers, tagged ports in Cisco-speach are trunks (this might be confusing for you as 3com calls trunks what in Cisco world is known as either Etherchannel or port aggregation). By default a trunk (tagged) port allows any VLAN. If your policy requires so, you can explicitly specify which VLAN's are allowed on given trunk (tagged) port. If a frame arrives with a tag that is not on the allowed list, the frame will be discarded. So you don't need any fancy broadcast supression to block traffic from disallowed vlans coming from your 3com switch to cisco.
P.S.: Make sure that you don't mistake 'member of VLAN' with 'native VLAN'. Some parts of your message suggest that you do.

NPS Discarding RADIUS request from Cisco switch (802.1x)

Last few weeks I've been busy to get the following to work:
- Cisco 2960 switch as the suppliant
- Another Cisco 2960 as the authenticator switch
- The supplicant is only able to send MS-EAP MS-ChapV2 requests
- The NPS server is Windows 2008 R2 (and also tested on 2012 R2)
This is called "NEAT" by Cisco; which does seem to work with Cisco ISE (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/8021x/116681-config-neat-cise-00.html)
but I'd like to get it to work with Windows NPS.
Within NPS I've setup the following Connection Request policy:
- NAS Port Type: Ethernet
I'm using the following Network Policy:
- User Group: DOMAIN\Switches (the useraccount used by the switch is part of this group)
- NAS Port Type: Ethernet
- Autehntcation Type: EAP
Now the request sent by the switch is discarded. The actual error is the following (excluded irrelevant information):
User:
Account Name: Rotterdam-Switch-8-1
Account Domain: DOMAIN
Authentication Details:
Connection Request Policy Name: Secure Wired Connections
Network Policy Name: Switches Allowed
Authentication Provider: Windows
Authentication Server: SERVER.DOMAIN.local
Authentication Type: EAP
EAP Type: -
Account Session Identifier: -
Reason Code: 1
Reason: An internal error occurred. Check the system event log for additional information.
Wireshark on the NPS server shows:
1. The RADIUS Access-Request (1) being received by the NPS Server
2. The NPS Server sending out a RADIUS Access-Challenge (11) to the authenticator switch
3. Another RADIUS Access-Request (1) is beging received by the NPS Server
Packet 2 has an t=EAP-Message(79) with type MS-EAP-Authentication [Palekar](26) and MS-CHAPv2-ID set to 2 and OpCode 1 (Challange)
Packet 3 has an t=EAP-Message(79) with type MS-EAP-Authentication [Palekar](26) and MS-CHAPv2-ID set to 2 and OpCode 2 (Response)
I've also tried the following:
- I've also tested with an invalid username/password. The request is correctly denied
- I've also tested by added ALL EAP Types as condition to the Network Policy. The request isn't pickup by this policy anymore.
Any help would be greatly appriciated ofcourse.
Kind regards,
Peter

It only took like.. uhm.. forever.. but there's an answer which is "OK ish..".
Cisco 2960 switches support EAP-MSCHAP; but it seems that NPS only supports EAP-MSCHAP for VPN Connections and not for Wired/Wirelss authentication. Something to do with inner and outer methods and NPS requireing PEAP as an outer method for Wired/Wirelss
authentication.
End result is that both the Cisco switches and NPS do support EAP-MD5. Though it's definitly not as secure (at all), it's definitly a step in the right direction and it's something that we'll be implementing.
Now it seems that NPS doesn't support EAP-MD5 (which is supposidly depricated), it's possible to re-enable it. Using the following articles.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922574/en-us
Microsft mentioned me that "Though this article says it applies to Windows Vista only, it does apply to Server 2008R2 as well. Also I would suggest you the following link:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981190"
Please note that you'll have to enable 'Store password using reversible encryption’ on the accounts that will be used for NEAT authentication.
All though I would have hoped EAP-MSCHAPv2 would work, I feel I do need to clarify that I understand Microsoft's point of view on this as well. They feel EAP methods without PEAP are simply not safe; which is understandable, espcially for EAP-MD5 which
could be sniffer using a hub/repeater/etc.
Kind regards,
Peter

Configuration Cisco switch 802.1x for ISE

Hi dears,
I configurated EAP_FAST authentication on Cisco ISE from Cisco Video material. Now I need full 802.1X configuration in cisco switch guide or video link.
Please provide this.
Thanks.

See this link:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-2/user_guide/ise_user_guide/ise_sw_cnfg.html

Firewall Ports Required for NAC manager to manage/add Cisco switch

Hi,
I am trying to add cisco switches to the NAM, however i am not able to add the switch as I am getting the error "unable to control switch" I have tried to open ports 161-162 on the firwall; if i was to allow any traffic between the NAM and switch, the cisco NAM is able to add/manage the switch.
Not sure what other ports may be required for cisco NAM to manage the switch?
Thanks.

Hi,
AFAIK, only the UDP ports 161-162 for the SNMP communication need to be open.
Please make sure you have configured the correct port on the switch:
(config)# snmp-server host 172.16.1.61 traps version 2c cam_v2 udp-port 162 mac-notification snmp
If still not working i would check the logs on the firewall for any blocked traffic between the CAM and the switch.
HTH,
Tiago
If this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.

Cisco switches and 802.1.x

Hi, there !
I have a question for you.
Cisco all switches, is it impossible to present for 802.1x ?
I try to put a network access server in our network to authenticate.
Thanks.
I will wait your answer.
Regards.

Most Cisco switches will handle 802.1x, but it depends on the switch and the OS. Which specific ones are you considering?
Wes

Ask the Expert: Cisco's 802.11ac Solutions - Deployment, Design, and Interop

Ask your Questions on Cisco’s 802.11ac Solutions - Deployment, Design, and Interop with Cisco Experts: Richard Hamby and Shankar Ramanathan.
Monday, March 30th, 2015 to Friday, April 10th, 2015
Richard Hamby is a senior technical support engineer and Team Lead of the Cisco Technical Assistance Center in Richardson, Texas. He is an expert in Indoor and Outdoor wireless for the full line of Cisco Unified and Converged Access Wireless products, as well as TAC Engineering Engagement Engineer liaison to project engineering teams for new Cisco wireless products. Prior to his current role, Richard was a customer support engineer with the AAA Security TAC team supporting Cisco identity management solutions and been with Cisco since 2009.
Shankar Ramanathan is a Customer Support Engineer at the Cisco Technical Center. He is a Technical Content Engineer and Subject Matter Expert for Cisco Enterprise Unified and Converged Access wireless mobility solution including Wireless LAN Controller 2500/5500/WISM2/7500/8500, Converged access 5760/3650/3850 switches, Access Points Lightweight and Autonomous, VoWLAN (792x/9971) , Cisco Prime Infrastructure SNMP management, Cisco Mobility Services Engine(MSE/ CMX). Prior to joining Cisco in November 2011, he worked as a wireless network engineer at Elan Technologies, responsible for RF wireless network planning, simulation, propagation path analysis, and optimization of Wi-Fi 802.11 mesh and WiMax (802.16 d/e) networks for various system integration and automation projects. Shankar holds a master of science degree in electrical engineering specializing in communications and signal process from the State University of New York, Buffalo. Shankar has a CCIE in Wireless(#40548) and CCNA certified (number 410004168640IMZF) and has over six years of industry experience.
Find other https://supportforums.cisco.com/expert-corner/events.
**Ratings Encourage Participation! **
Please be sure to rate the Answers to Questions

A common question we are asked is 'why is my device not achieving 11ac data rates?'
One of the most common answers relates to client compatibility/capability. To get the highest possible data rates of 11ac (assuming proper distance and RF health), the AP and the client device must both be capable supporting the requirements - 5GHZ, 80MHz Channel, short guard interval, 3 spatial streams. Each spatial stream has a max of 433.3Mb/s (at 80MHz, short GI).
The majority of 11ac-capable wireless cards on the market do not support 3 spatial streams. Most adapters in wireless-capable devices are 1SS or 2SS. For example, the Intel 7260 11ac adapter used in many devices is a 2SS adapter - therefore it's max possible data rate is 866.7. Another common adapter in use is the 11ac Broadcom 3SS that Apple uses in the newer Macbooks. These devices can achieve the 1.3GBs PHY data rate.
This guidance is the same for 11n adapters as well. To achieve max rate, your 11n AP and adapter must both support 40MHz channels, 3SS, short GI.
Note: The 11n and 11ac standards both define support for 4SS. 4SS-capable devices are rare, so 3SS is essentially our reality.
One of the most useful references for questions related to this topic is the AP Data Sheet for each AP. Here's the AP3700 for example:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/3700-series-access-point/data_sheet_c78-729421.html
Table 1 lists the expected data rate per MCS Index value by #SS at each channel width and GI. Indexes 0-7 are the same for 11n and 11ac (11n limited to 40MHz channels of course). And MCS 8 & 9 are 11ac-only 256-QAM modulations.

DACL does not get downloaded to Cisco Switch from ISE

Hello,
I have a cisco switch with ios: c3550-ipbasek9-mz.122-44.SE6.bin
I am trying to push dACL fro my ISE device into the switch, but it is not getting applied to switch.   dynamic vlan assignment workds fine, but dACL doesnot apply
Any instruction plz?

Hi Jatin,
ISE is properly configured for dACL,   i think there is some compatibility issue on cisco switch ios.
following is the debug output>>
06:36:43: dot1x-packet:Received an EAP packet on interface FastEthernet0/11
06:36:43: EAPOL pak dump rx
06:36:43: EAPOL Version: 0x1 type: 0x0 length: 0x0006
06:36:43: dot1x-packet:Received an EAP packet on the FastEthernet0/11 from mac 0019.b981.e812
06:36:43: dot1x-sm:Posting EAPOL_EAP on Client=1D68028
06:36:43:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/11: during state auth_bend_request, got event 6(eapolEap)
06:36:43: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/11: auth_bend_request -> auth_bend_response
06:36:43: dot1x-sm:Fa0/11:0019.b981.e812:auth_bend_response_enter called
06:36:43: dot1x-ev:dot1x_sendRespToServer: Response sent to the server from 0019.b981.e812
06:36:43: dot1x-sm:Fa0/11:0019.b981.e812:auth_bend_request_response_action called
06:36:43: RADIUS/ENCODE(00000049):Orig. component type = DOT1X
06:36:43: RADIUS(00000049): Config NAS IP: 192.168.2.250
06:36:43: RADIUS/ENCODE(00000049): acct_session_id: 73
06:36:43: RADIUS(00000049): sending
06:36:43: RADIUS(00000049): Send Access-Request to 192.168.2.231:1812 id 1645/99, len 267
06:36:43: RADIUS: authenticator 5B 61 1D 64 D3 D5 9F AD - 23 E0 11 11 B3 C3 5C 81
06:36:43: RADIUS: User-Name           [1]   6   "test"
06:36:43: RADIUS: Service-Type        [6]   6   Framed                    [2]
06:36:43: RADIUS: Framed-MTU          [12] 6   1500
06:36:43: RADIUS: Called-Station-Id   [30] 19 "00-11-5C-6E-5E-0B"
06:36:43: RADIUS: Calling-Station-Id [31] 19 "00-19-B9-81-E8-12"
06:36:43: RADIUS: EAP-Message         [79] 8
06:36:43: RADIUS:   02 7A 00 06 0D 00                 [ z]
06:36:43: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18
06:36:43: RADIUS:   A6 AB 5A CA ED B8 B4 1E 36 00 9D AB 1A F6 B9 E0                [ Z6]
06:36:43: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco       [26] 49
06:36:43: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   43 "audit-session-id=C0A802FA0000006F016B36D8"
06:36:43: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type       [61] 6   Ethernet                  [15]
06:36:43: RADIUS: NAS-Port            [5]   6   50011
06:36:43: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Id         [87] 18 "FastEthernet0/11"
06:36:43: RADIUS: State               [24] 80
06:36:43: RADIUS:   33 37 43 50 4D 53 65 73 73 69 6F 6E 49 44 3D 43 [37CPMSessionID=C]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   30 41 38 30 32 46 41 30 30 30 30 30 30 36 46 30 [0A802FA0000006F0]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   31 36 42 33 36 44 38 3B 33 35 53 65 73 73 69 6F [16B36D8;35Sessio]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   6E 49 44 3D 69 73 65 2D 73 65 72 76 65 72 2D 31 [nID=ise-server-1]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   2F 31 37 31 30 32 35 39 38 38 2F 32 34 3B    [ /171025988/24;]
06:36:43: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address      [4]   6   192.168.2.250
06:36:43: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/11, changed state to up
06:36:43: RADIUS: Received from id 1645/99 192.168.2.231:1812, Access-Challenge, len 1134
06:36:43: RADIUS: authenticator 78 36 A3 38 30 1C F0 7A - 19 83 93 81 B4 6B FF 9E
06:36:43: RADIUS: State               [24] 80
06:36:43: RADIUS:   33 37 43 50 4D 53 65 73 73 69 6F 6E 49 44 3D 43 [37CPMSessionID=C]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   30 41 38 30 32 46 41 30 30 30 30 30 30 36 46 30 [0A802FA0000006F0]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   31 36 42 33 36 44 38 3B 33 35 53 65 73 73 69 6F [16B36D8;35Sessio]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   6E 49 44 3D 69 73 65 2D 73 65 72 76 65 72 2D 31 [nID=ise-server-1]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   2F 31 37 31 30 32 35 39 38 38 2F 32 34 3B    [ /171025988/24;]
06:36:43: RADIUS: EAP-Message         [79] 255
06:36:43: RADIUS:   4D 5D 13 47 FC 46 16 EE 62 76 40 09 77 48 31 B6 01 6B 5E 52 33 56 A2 1E 34 [M]GFbv@wH1k^R3V4]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   02 32 39 FA 4D CA 79 18 4A 42 A2 4E 5C BD AE 29 D2 3D D1 5A FC C2 ED 3E E5 FB C6 B8 D8 DE A8 75 EB 3A A5 7D 02 03 01 00 01 A3 81 CD 30 [29MyJBN\)=Z>u:}0]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   81 CA 30 0B 06 03 55 1D 0F 04 04 03 02 01 86 30 0F 06 03 55 1D 13 01 01 FF 04 05 30 03 01 01 FF 30 1D 06 03 55 1D 0E 04 16 04 14 C4 56 80 A7 C9 18 50 92 EE CC 91 D4 E1 EC DB AD E7 1E 70 A8 30 79 06 03 55 1D 1F 04 72 30 70 [0U0U00UVPp0yUr0p]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   30 6E A0 6C A0 6A 86 32 68 74 74 70 3A 2F 2F 73 79 73 6C [0nlj2http://sysl]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   6F 67 2D 73 65 72 76 65 72 2F 43 65 72 74 45 6E [og-server/CertEn]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   72 6F 6C 6C 2F 46 4D 46 42 5F 54 72 75 73 74 65 [roll/FMFB_Truste]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   64 43 41 2E 63 72 6C 86 34 66 69 6C 65 3A 2F 2F 5C [dCA.crl4file://\]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   5C 73 79 73 6C 6F 67 2D 73 65 72 76 65 72 5C 43 [\syslog-server\C]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   65 72 74 45 6E 72 6F 6C 6C 5C 46 4D 46 42 5F 54 [ertEnroll\FMFB_T]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   72 75 73 74 65 64 43 41 2E         [ rustedCA.]
06:36:43: RADIUS: EAP-Message         [79] 251
06:36:43: RADIUS:   63 72 6C 30 10 06 09 2B 06 01 04 01 82 37 15 01 04 03 02 01 00 30 0D 06 09 2A 86 48 86 F7 0D 01 01 05 05 00 03 82 01 01 00 63 BA F8 CE D5 8B 0E 94 77 AE 86 6C 37 AB 2F 36 9A B2 85 D5 4A [crl0+70*Hcwl7/6J]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   74 8C 33 F5 93 06 A6 57 8D 39 56 8F 02 08 97 CB C6 08 70 8C 22 1E 5D 1F A8 26 6D 60 1F 05 62 D1 24 AB 03 8C 41 F8 1C F1 F8 C2 87 8B 97 02 71 FC 6A [t3W9Vp"]&m`b$Aqj]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   EB 12 FC DD 8C 5C 9C 2D AF D2 C4 1C 18 1B 40 BE 78 B0 54 55 59 89 03 1B B7 FB 91 85 EE CA C0 18 1C 78 5D 4D BA FA 9E 44 D3 45 53 A3 BE 46 8A FB 81 BD F1 4C B3 3B [\-@xTUYx]MDESFL;]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   D6 66 7E 5B 79 9F 83 53 5E 49 92 B5 7F E5 1A E2 86 8C 83 96 7D 75 A5 1D 08 4E 32 C3 5E EC BF 28 53 EC 53 8A C3 E0 36 [f~[yS^I}uN2^(SS6]
06:36:43: RADIUS:   82 EE AA 0D 38 3E BA 9C 1D D9 24 BD 48 A6 EE 44 BD 95 68 85 CA 8C 44 F8 E8 A2 FB 94 BC 6F 7C F2 06 91 6C A0 A6 BB 7B 7F 56 BD 15 32 A4     [ 8>$HDhDo|l{V2]
06:36:43: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18
06:36:43: RADIUS:   DD 82 F7 10 3F C7 B5 62 9B 2A BB 24 16 A7 59 33            [ ?b*$Y3]
06:36:44: RADIUS(00000049): Received from id 1645/99
06:36:44: RADIUS/DECODE: EAP-Message fragments, 253+253+253+249, total 1008 bytes
06:36:44: dot1x-packet:Received an EAP request packet from EAP for mac 0019.b981.e812
06:36:44: dot1x-sm:Posting EAP_REQ on Client=1D68028
06:36:44:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/11: during state auth_bend_response, got event 7(eapReq)
06:36:44: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/11: auth_bend_response -> auth_bend_request
06:36:44: dot1x-sm:Fa0/11:0019.b981.e812:auth_bend_response_exit called
06:36:44: dot1x-sm:Fa0/11:0019.b981.e812:auth_bend_request_enter called
06:36:44: dot1x-packet:dot1x_mgr_send_eapol :EAP code: 0x1 id: 0x7B length: 0x03F0 type: 0xD data: @Cfui[ab2,Jt1){                                                                                                                              2]g&GZ1pIbu;+Ga;iF"jy#
oohuV.aFZ4_|
P0`At   )B
06:36:44: dot1x-ev:FastEthernet0/11:Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
06:36:44: dot1x-ev:dot1x_mgr_pre_process_eapol_pak: Role determination not required on FastEthernet0/11.
06:36:44: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18
06:36:44: RADIUS:   F5 B0 56 D3 C6 87 BD 10 6E C7 4A 72 5B 5C 60 C5           [ VnJr[\`]
06:36:44: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco       [26] 49
06:36:44: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   43 "audit-session-id=C0A802FA0000006F016B36D8"
06:36:44: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type       [61] 6   Ethernet                  [15]
06:36:44: RADIUS: NAS-Port            [5]   6   50011
06:36:44: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Id         [87] 18 "FastEthernet0/11"
06:36:44: RADIUS: State               [24] 80
06:36:44: RADIUS:   33 37 43 50 4D 53 65 73 73 69 6F 6E 49 44 3D 43 [37CPMSessionID=C]
06:36:44: RADIUS:   30 41 38 30 32 46 41 30 30 30 30 30 30 36 46 30 [0A802FA0000006F0]
06:36:45: dot1x-ev:FastEthernet0/11:Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
06:36:45: dot1x-ev:dot1x_mgr_pre_process_eapol_pak: Role determination not required on FastEthernet0/11.
06:36:45: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
06:36:45: dot1x-ev:dot1x_mgr_send_eapol: Sending out EAPOL packet on FastEthernet0/11
06:36:45: EAPOL pak dump Tx
06:36:45: EAPOL Version: 0x2 type: 0x0 length: 0x0039
06:36:45: EAP code: 0x1 id: 0x7E length: 0x0039 type: 0xD
06:36:45: dot1x-packet:dot1x_txReq: EAPOL packet sent to client (0019.b981.e812)
06:36:45: dot1x-sm:Fa0/11:0019.b981.e812:auth_bend_response_request_action called
06:36:46: dot1x-ev:dot1x_mgr_pre_process_eapol_pak: Role determination not required on FastEthernet0/11.
06:36:46: dot1x-packet:dot1x_mgr_process_eapol_pak: queuing an EAPOL pkt on Authenticator Q
06:36:46: dot1x-ev:Enqueued the eapol packet to the global authenticator queue
06:36:46: EAPOL pak dump rx
06:36:46: EAPOL Version: 0x1 type: 0x0 length: 0x0006
06:36:46: dot1x-ev:
dot1x_auth_queue_event: Int Fa0/11 CODE= 2,TYPE= 13,LEN= 6
06:36:46: dot1x-packet:Received an EAPOL frame on interface FastEthernet0/11
06:36:46: dot1x-ev:Received pkt saddr =0019.b981.e812 , daddr = 0180.c200.0003,
                    pae-ether-type = 888e.0100.0006
06:36:46: dot1x-ev:dot1x_auth_process_eapol: EAPOL flag status of the port Fa0/11 is TRUE

SIP 7960 to non-Cisco Switch

Does anyone know if a 7960 (SIP) phone can connect to a non-Cisco switch and separate the Voice traffic from the access port traffic?
I tried connecting a 7960 to a baystack 450T, configuring the switchport as a "tagged trunk", and then changing the Admin Vlan ID on the phone to the desired voice vlan. It looks as though the switch wants the access port traffic to be tagged as well.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Darin

Hi !
You need to configure a 802.1q trunk on your non-cisco switch. The 802.1q native vlan should be the one the PC is in. The voice vlan will be tagged.
Configure all parameters (like voice-vlan-id etc) on the phone manually (obviously CDP does not work). I have done it and it works fine (but i never tried on the switch you mentioned).
Inline Power will also not work because the 7960 is not 802.3af compliant (yet).
Mike

NTP Service on Domain Controller have problem with cisco switch

Hello!
I have Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 Domain Controller with NTP services
The windows opertion system clients get NTP time ok.
There are problem with cisco switch, can't get time from NTP.
Can anybody help me to fix problem?
C:\Users\Sysuser>w32tm /query /configuration
[Configuration]
EventLogFlags: 2 (Local)
AnnounceFlags: 5 (Local)
TimeJumpAuditOffset: 28800 (Local)
MinPollInterval: 6 (Local)
MaxPollInterval: 10 (Local)
MaxNegPhaseCorrection: 1800 (Local)
MaxPosPhaseCorrection: 1800 (Local)
MaxAllowedPhaseOffset: 300 (Local)
FrequencyCorrectRate: 4 (Local)
PollAdjustFactor: 5 (Local)
LargePhaseOffset: 50000000 (Local)
SpikeWatchPeriod: 900 (Local)
LocalClockDispersion: 10 (Local)
HoldPeriod: 5 (Local)
PhaseCorrectRate: 7 (Local)
UpdateInterval: 100 (Local)
[TimeProviders]
NtpClient (Local)
DllName: C:\Windows\system32\w32time.dll (Local)
Enabled: 1 (Local)
InputProvider: 1 (Local)
AllowNonstandardModeCombinations: 1 (Local)
ResolvePeerBackoffMinutes: 15 (Policy)
ResolvePeerBackoffMaxTimes: 7 (Policy)
CompatibilityFlags: 2147483648 (Local)
EventLogFlags: 0 (Policy)
LargeSampleSkew: 3 (Local)
SpecialPollInterval: 3600 (Policy)
Type: NTP (Policy)
NtpServer: 10.7.0.4 (Policy)
NtpServer (Local)
DllName: C:\Windows\system32\w32time.dll (Local)
Enabled: 1 (Local)
InputProvider: 0 (Local)
AllowNonstandardModeCombinations: 1 (Local)
VMICTimeProvider (Local)
DllName: C:\Windows\System32\vmictimeprovider.dll (Local)
Enabled: 1 (Local)
InputProvider: 1 (Local)
Cisco config and errors
CISCO1#show ntp ass det
10.7.0.7 configured, insane, invalid, stratum 3
ref ID 10.7.0.4, time D5BC850F.C8400AB2 (15:50:39.782 MSK Mon Aug 19 2013)
our mode client, peer mode server, our poll intvl 1024, peer poll intvl 1024
root delay 62.50 msec, root disp 11128.04, reach 377, sync dist 11218.796
delay 6.06 msec, offset -467951.1096 msec, dispersion 56.49
precision 2**6, version 3
org time D5BC8864.F79C33A7 (16:04:52.967 MSK Mon Aug 19 2013)
rcv time D5BC8A38.EBDECB39 (16:12:40.921 MSK Mon Aug 19 2013)
xmt time D5BC8A38.EA5173BE (16:12:40.915 MSK Mon Aug 19 2013)
filtdelay = 6.06 5.87 3.23 7.90 6.41 5.17 13.03 3.43
filtoffset = -467951 -467905 -467936 -467885 -467764 -467816 -467707 -467697
filterror = 0.02 15.64 31.27 46.89 62.52 78.14 93.75 93.78

Hi,
>>I gave log on as a service right to this account in Default Domain Controllers Policy but unfortunately it was not enough
Based on your description, we can try to grant this account Allow log on locally
user right in the default domain controller policy to see if it helps.
The policy setting is:
Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security Settings\Local Policies\User Rights Assignment\Allow log on locally
Allow log on locally
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc756809(v=ws.10).aspx#feedback
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback here.
Best regards,
Frank Shen

Cisco Switch SG300-20

I want to know Cisco Switch SG300-20 is Layer 2 or Layer 3 switch. I Have simple network Layer2 switched, Our Database speed on client is normal. when we add that switch in front of database, it slow the speed of database entry at workstation. Please guide.

Hello Ross,
The access port may be a single member of a vlan untag. The trunk port may be a member of multiple vlan. Ingress filtering may NOT be disabled on an access or trunk port.
The general port is an 802.1 port which may specify tag or untag and the ingress filtering may be disabled.
Ingress filtering is a feature, that if the ingress port receives an unknown vlan tag, it will discard the packet.
There is not a guest port, there is a guest VLAN. The smart port for Guest makes the port untag member of the native vlan. The guest vlan does not authenticate against the 802.1x when specified.
There is a customer port, which is a service provider configuration for QinQ tunneling.
The port connecting between router and switch should be either trunk or general and all vlan you want to pass between devices should be specified on the ports.
-Tom

Connecting 300 IP Cameras using Cisco Switches

Require help on a Case study. (Can only use Cisco switch)
Description:
This is a setup required for 300 security cameras.
So availability and redundancy is important.
I have calculate the bandwidth using [URL="http://www.jvsg.com/download/IPDesignToolSetup.zip"]this software[/URL].
If each camera is set to 5MP and H.264-10, Bandwidth is 12.08Mbit
So 300 cameras will require at least 3624.96Mbits in total.
(correct me if i am wrong)
Each NVR has 32 port.
It will be just connecting within a LAN.
Here is the brief 2 possible design I have draft out, but I am not sure which model and series of cisco switch to be use??
Design 1:
Design 2:
Please advise which model and series can be used for this 2 two of design.

Hello Chun,
you need to accomodate 300 cameras and 32 ports for each network video recorder.
data flows are from cameras to network video recorder ports.
The amount of traffic per port at port connected to cameras is not huge and total traffic from cameras exceed GE links
48 * 12,08 = ?? in any case less then < 1 Gbps
You can deploy a hierarchical network design with an access layer made of switches with fixed configuration 48 ports and GE uplinks like a C3750 with 48 ports or a 2960 with 48 ports (if it exists)
Each access layer switch needs to have two uplinks to distribution switches
And you need 300/48 switches => 7 switches => 7 GE uplinks on each distribution switches
Distribution switches should be two and should be able to connect to access layer switches and to NVR that requires 32 ports each.
Different solutions are possible:
instead od deploying 7 standalone switches with 48 ports each you could use two modular C4507 equipped with WS-4548 48 10/100/1000 linecards
the distribution switches can be two C3750 E, eventually configured and connected as a stack, to allow to use both uplinks of each access layer switch
Hope to help
Giuseppe

What customization settings required for automatic availably check,

Dear Guru's
While doing Sales order my availability check should be carried out, but it is not happening automatically, what settings required for the automatic availably check. Pleasantly we are doing it manually.
Regards,
Kalyan

Hi Kalyan,
ATP check requires following configuration setting.
1) The availability check is indecator needs to be switched on at requirement class lavel.
2) The availability check is indecator needs to be switched on at schedule line lavel.
3) Set availability check 02/ 01(individual / daily requirement) in Sales Genral plant view of Material master.
4) Set the checking group in the MRP3 view of Material master.
5) Above all a plant must be assigned to the line item in the sales order.
Please do let me know if you have any concern.
Thanks,
Rupak.

Physical port security on Cisco switching

We have a security problem I would like to resolve. Like most sites our wired network has live ports that periodically, non corporate PCs and laptops connect up to without our knowledge. In our network we do not filter for valid MAC addresses although Ive learned this is a poor approach to security as MAC can be changed in about 10 seconds.
I would like a solution that would validate corporate systems and let them through the Cisco layer 3 switching and block out all other devices which attempt connection. We do not currently have IDS or IPS and are not likely to in short term.
Is there a hardware or software or combination solution out there that works well for this ?
Thank you

Steve
2 solutions spring to mind
1) 802.1x authentication. Microsoft XP/Vista has built in 802.1x supplicant and Cisco switches support Network EAP used to pass the 802.1x messages. What you also need is an authentication server such as Cisco Secure ACS server although Microsoft IAS server also supports 802.1x.
Basically before a client is allowed access to the network they have to authenticate to the network with valid credentials otherwise the port is shutdown.
2) NAC - Network Admission Control. This goes one step further than 1) whereby the client is also checked to see if it conforms to company policy eg. does it have the right virus checker on it etc.. and if it doesn't the client can be quarantined.
A search on Cisco's website for both NAC and 802.1x will provide a lot of useful links.
Jon

CISCO MST (802.1S) config digest KEY calculation

Hi,
We and others before us have checked that CISCO MST (802.1S) config digest KEY calculation was not done as expected by 802.1S:
the 16 bytes configuration digest in the BPDU from Cisco does not follow the recommendation of the 802.1s. They have different values compared with those value shown in 802.1s Table 13-2. So Cisco may not use HMAC-MD5 or the signature key as specified in 802.1s 13-7(4), and Table 13-1.
CISCO MST white paper extract:
a digest of the VLANs-to-instance mapping table is sent, along with the revision number and the name. Once a switch receives a BPDU, the switch extracts the digest (a numerical value derived from the VLAN-to-instance mapping table through a mathematical function) and compares this digest with its own computed digest. If the digests differ, the port on which the BPDU was received is at the boundary of a region.
Could anyone tell us:
- how config digest key is currently calculated?
- if it is planned to be compliant
- if it is, when it is scheduled?
- on what IOS/CATos platforms?
Many thanks.
Regards/Ludovic.

Cisco MST implementation was a pre-standard implementation because the software was created before the 802.1s standard was officially adopted.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCea38886
CAT OS 8.3(1) and later and newer 12.2 IOS are standard compliant

NAP- Settings required on Cisco switches- 802.1X

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for