Need help deciding between iMac or Display

I'm hoping some of you mac pros can help me with some advice. A few months ago I made the switch and bought a macbook and realised how great it was for photography, but am now wishing I had a larger screen. I can't decide if I should keep the macbook and get a display to hook it up to, or sell the macbook and buy a new imac. If anyone with either of these could help me out with some pros and cons I would be most grateful !!!

Hi LilacRose
If you bought the Macbook for portability then buy a screen, if possible go to a dealer and take you Macbook to try some out.
You probably will need at least a 20" so consider if you have permanent space for presumably an iMac (the keyboard will store under the screen on the stand) or the screen.
It comes down to what other things you want to do with the machine, for instance if you want take it to show friends or family photos you have, then maybe keep the Macbook and have the benefit of the big screen for editing etc.
Remember that although Macs hold their value you will still lose some money possibly.
chris
iMac 20" Intel Core Duo 2GB RAM Mac OS X (10.4.8) G3 600 iBook 640MB OS X (10.2.8) Lacie d2 60GB & 250GB Firewire Windows XP

Similar Messages

Need help deciding between 2 slr cameras

I would love some help in deciding between 2 cameras, canon digital rebel xt and nikon d50. Since both seem to be rated equally, I want to base my decision on which one is easier to work with in iphoto or at least adobe elements 2 or 3. I have heard that raw files are proprietary and I don't even know if either will work on my mac. (do not have usb2 only usb1).
Especially since I do not have any experience with any digital camera, I would appreciate any suggestions.
thank you

Thank you all for responding. I have been away from my computer and again I am not receiving e-mails letting me know if someone has replied.
To answer a few questions; I will mainly be doing iDVD and iMovie slideshows and a few good prints (hopefully). I will be mainly taking photos of family and especially a new baby. After some research I was told that slrs take faster pixs, therefore more suitable for a moving baby, especially if shooting in a continuous mode. I also do not want a long delay before I take another pix so I can capture that special baby expression. I also want sharp pictures with realistic colors and enough pixels to crop. Since I do edit, crop ... I thought RAW might be a better choice than jpgs, since I understand that jpgs lose a lot of quality when touched up.
Since I did not know anyone answered me, I bought the Canon. I am somewhat disappointed. I do not know if it is my fault or the cameras. I went to about 7 stores and asked the salespeople their opinion and all varied. Quite a few told me I would get sharper photos with the Nikon and maybe they were right. My Canon shoots pretty good color (although a little on the orange side, especially skin colors), BUT THEY ARE ALL SOFT, as one saleman warned me about. I am very disappointed since a friend's Nikon coolpix 5200 has sharper images than my canon at a third of the price.
I now have this dilemna in that I have till Sunday to exchange it for a Nikon, but I am afraid that I might be exchanging one problem for another, or that the softness is caused by me regardless which camera I use. In that case I prefer the canon because it is lighter.
I also discovered that Minolta makes a camera with anti-shake that is in the same price range. Maybe that would solve my problem, however it is the heaviest of all 3, but I would be willing to buy it if the anti-shake gives a sharper photo. I want these photos to eventually look good on a HD television.

Need help deciding between i5 and i7 X220

I am trying to decide between i5 and i7. The extra money doesn't bother me and I know the i7 isn't that much faster than the i5.
There are problems with the mSata drives for those with i7/USB3 machines but I don't plan on using mSata yet.
Some people have had problems with their USB 3.0 ports not providing full speed. As an aside, you can get newer USB 3.0 drivers from http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=Y&DwnldID=19880&keyword=usb+3.0&lang=eng . There is also new NEC/Renesas firmware at http://www.station-drivers.com/page/nec.htm. I have used these on my desktop with an add-on NEC/Renesas-based USB 3.0 adapter with success.
So the question is, are i7 owners happy with their choice or should i7 be avoided for now?
Also, any i7 owners have their USB 3.0 working fine with a USB 3.0 hard drive?
Are there any other issues such as heat or fan noise that are worse on the i7?

Also, will the batty life be affected by the i7/i5 choice?

Hi, I need help deciding between 2 notebooks

I have an Asus g1s which I bought from bestbuy 2 years back. I'm going to get it replaced soon and was trying to decide between a couple models. I really want a future proof laptop for gaming.
here they are:
Alienware M17x
ntel® Core™2 Quad processor Q9000 2.0Ghz;
4GB DDR3 SDRAM;
DL DVD±RW/CD-RW drive;
17" widescreen WXGA+ 1440x900;
500GB hd 7200 rpm;
Dual Nvidia GeForce GTX 260M graphics;
PRICE:2,299.99
Asus G72Gx
Intel® Core™2 Quad processor Q9000 2.0Ghz;
6GB DDR2 memory;
DL DVD±RW/CD-RW drive;
17.3" widescreen LED-backlit LCD 1600x900;
640GB hard drive (320GB x 2; 7200 rpm);
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M graphics;
PRICE:1,299.99
So as you can see the Alienware is a thousand bucks more and the only thing better about it is the gpu. The screen, the hd are a bit worse but I dont care about the tiny difference. I can't really tell which ones ram is better so what do you guys think?
Is it really worth paying 1000$ more for dual gpus?
(please feel free to ask me any questions)

Personally, I would never get a laptop for gaming, unless it's an absolute must for some reason. You get a lot more for your money with a desktop system, heat is much less of an issue as well. Everyone I know with a gaming laptop can't use it on a flat surface and either have to have a cooling mat or prop the laptop up to keep it from overheating.
However, if you are going to get a gaming laptop I would go for one of the Core i7 (Nehalem) based models instead of Core 2 duo.
Computers are NOT appliances, they MUST be maintained! Educate yourself on how to do this and save yourself headaches, repair bills, and lost data!

Need help deciding between two different Zen products [micro vs ... micr

Hey all,
Just bought a black zen micro last Wednesday and am loving it. Bought it from Best Buy and splurged on the extra protection plan. Unfortunatlly, after a trip to Fry's today, I'm questioning my impulse buy.
At Fry's they have two different box sets of Zen Micros. One small one, like the one I got at Best Buy, with the player/battery, headphones, usb cable and smooth little pouch. But they also had a larger box with player/battery, headphones, usb cable, smooth little pouch AND an AC charger (and I'm not sure, but possibly a second battery?). I am assuming that this large box with more items (but still the same $99 price) is an older box. What I'm wondering is if there is any difference between the players in the two boxes. If there is not a difference, then I'm going back to Best Buy to get a refund and get one of the boxes at Fry's that has the charger with it (a much needed accessory for my uses). Of course, if the players do differ, I would have to find out in what way and weigh my option to keep what I have or return it and base a decision on that. That, of course, is what prompted this post.
I know some players just can't help but be deffecti've, does this older box contain a series with a higher rate of returns? Does it look different (I really like the way the back lighting looks on mine)? Anyone have experience with one of the older boxed sets and one of the newer ones (bought one, then another for S.O.)?
I'm already leaning towards return, but I just wanted to check with other creative users before I made my final decision.
Thanks,
-Jonathan

There is no difference in the operation of the players. The very early Micros had the word "BACK" on the return button, the newer version just has a left pointing arrow. Supposedly, the newest units have a revision to the headphone jack, but there is no way of telling if you have the better or worse jack. The large box will also have the holder with the belt clip and stand. The Limited Edition has the extra battery, and is clearly marked with a sticker on the front of the box that says "Limited Edition FREE Extra Battery for 24 Hour Playtime. Some people say that the backlighting is different with the newer units, I dont know. The large box IS the older retail version. Hope this helps you.

Need help deciding between MacBook Pros...

I have recently decided to switch to the MacSide and I narrowed my quest down to one of the 15" MacBook Pros.
I will be editing for stop motion videos mostly. I will be using Final Cut Express. I imagine I will want to have FCE, garageband, iChat, and Safari all open at once. (I tend to multitask) I am unsure if the slight change in processor will make the $500 difference... or a big enough difference for the money. The 2.66GHz model also has a slightly better graphics card and 4GB of ram by default.
Has anyone been in a similar situation in which they can share their thoughts?
Thanks!
( I realized I put this in the incorrect category, so I am reposting.)

i say if you can afford it do it! "go big or go home"
i've had my powerbook g4 for about 5 years now, and it's running fine, a little slow! Sure, i know an upgrade is needed soon (im also running tiger). the macbook is a lot faster then my powerbook, n im runnin adobe suite and / or logic! but the main thing my old computer still rocks a little slower but runs fine!
u could also invest in apple care ($350 us)!
as for the graphic card, mine is older n crapier but it's fine, and i'm mostly doing visual stuff.
so ya if you got the extra 500 do it, if not or u don't think its at necessory upgrade get apple care.
Message was edited by: icahayes

Need help deciding between AI and EPS for use in XML

I am using a non-Adobe XML editing package/publishing engine. The vendor who set it up suggested that we use native AI files for editing and creating images, then export EPS files for use in the XML (it doesn't work with AI). The challenge is to keep the AI and EPS files in sync throughout the revision process.
My question is around whether we really need to keep the AI files or not. What are the actual elements we would be missing if we skipped the AI and just used the EPS files? Are EPS files less editable? I plan to test this, but I'm looking for issues to keep an eye on through testing.

I'm not sure whether PDF would be compatible, but I would not be surprised if it was not. If I create an image in Illustrator and save it as a PDF, will I be able to edit the PDF like an AI later? More importantly, is there anything from the AI format that would be missing in the PDF file?
Bottom line is, I don't want to have to store two files for each figure, but I don't want to compromise the editability or rendering quality.
Thanks for the quick answer!

MacBook Pro smell and need help deciding on which MacBook Pro to buy

So I bought a 17-inch MacBook Pro from my brother in August of 2009. He bought it in March of 2008. A couple days ago I noticed that my MacBook Pro has been releasing a really bad smell almost as if burning plastic. But the smell isn't that bad. What could be wrong with my MacBook Pro? I'm getting a New 15 or 13-inch MacBook Pro in June so idk if I should just not worry about it? And I need help deciding if I should get a high end 13-inch MacBook Pro or a low end 15-inch MacBook Pro?

What could be wrong with my MacBook Pro?
Take your computer to an Apple Store. The staff will be able to check as to the cause of the smell.
I'm getting a New 15 or 13-inch MacBook Pro in June so idk if I should just not worry about it? And I need help deciding if I should get a high end 13-inch MacBook Pro or a low end 15-inch MacBook Pro?
Why not ask in the MacBook Pro (Late 2008 and 2009) forum area?

Need Help in installations and connecting displays. Please!

Hello Everyone,
Need Help in installations and connecting displays. Please!
Im planning on installing in a cafe shop : (Store Self improvement)
4 TV's (can be Built in Wi-Fi) Store menus
2 touch screen tablets. To be use as Emenu (digital Menu)
1 60' TV ( Built in Wi-Fi) as Entrainment displays and in store advertising
What do I need to organize my project and make it looks cool and how to manageand controll all of the displays TV.

TNSTAAFL
I DO NOT work for Best Buy, Geek Squad and any way affiliated with them. I am a self-employed repairman. I specialize in TV's and desktop computers. I do not take sides. If BB is wrong I will say so. If you are a moron with a false sense of entitlement, then I will tell you.

Need help with my iMac ... it keeps freezing up on me no matter what I do.

Hello all,
I need help to figure out why my iMac keeps on freezing up on me. I used to have Norton SystemWorks installed but I recently uninstalled it because I found out it was poison to Mac OS X. I've used Memtest to check the memory in my iMac. The result of the test came up fine.
You can go to 'Cooling fans for iMac?' (one of my post) to read all of the solutions I have tries out. This post is the original post to try to fix the problem but it FAILED.
In the last week, I've backed up all of my data to my external hard drive. Then I totally erase my internal hard drive and made sure to zero out the drive. After, I proceeded to install Mac OS 9. I had some problems installing the system at first. I finally installed Mac OS 9 and upgraded it to the latest version of 9. Next, I tried to install Mac OS X 10.3 with difficulty. I then finally installed it. I notice during and after installing the both OSs, my iMac keep on freezing. After I installed Mac OS X 10.3, I updated the OS. And yes, while updating the OS, I've experience the same problem as before. I now have my system back to where it was before I did a fresh install of both Mac OS 9 and X.
You guest it, my iMac is still freezing up on me no matter what I do. Can someone please help me with this problem? Can he/she tell me what is going on with my iMac and how to fix it? All the help I can get would be appreciated. Thanks for you time and effort.
P.S. After trying all of the previous suggestions from other users, I came to an conclusion that one of the hardware in my iMac my be failing. I know for curtain it is NOT my memory. It my be something else inside my iMac.
iMac 500 MHz PowerPC G3 256 MB SDRAM 30 GB HD Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Rainbow -
I've read the thread you linked to above and the only thing I find missing in the saga is any mention of the PRAM battery. If it is depleted (and it would be getting close to depletion if it has never been replaced) it could be causing your problem.
Do you see any strangeness in the time or date displays? That would be a sure sign that the battery is dying. I haven't run into the problem of a bad battery causing constant freezing but it wouldn't hurt to check it out.
As far as temperature effects, the usual pattern of overheating would be a shutdown of the whole computer, a designed-in precaution.
Forgive the battery tutorial if you've already dealt with that possibility.
Schadow
FP iMac 800, 9.2.2/10.1.5; eMac 800, 9.2.2/10.4.6; iMac 266, 8.6 Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Deciding between iMac and Mac Pro

My current desktop computer (a PC) is basically dead. It is under extended warrenty but the custom build place I got it from tells me nothing is covered (because of their negligence but they won't admit that) And basically they want me to pay out of pocket for a brand new computer.
However after having a Macbook Pro for a year and loving it I decided to just change my desktop over to a Mac which I want to purchase by the end of October (or if this computer gives out before then earlier) However I just can't decide between an iMac or a Mac Pro.
The 2 big things are video editing at the moment just Final Cut Express and gaming when/if I get a chance. The iMac I'm looking at is the 3.06 GHz, with 4 GB ram, and a Geforce 8800GS video card. On the Mac Pro side it'd be more or less the Stock Mac Pro with 2.8 GHZ Quad core x2, 4 GB Ram, and I'd purchase the ATI HD 3870 video card for it.
The other difficulty is I do need a new monitor as well with the iMac a new monitor isn't an issue but with the Mac Pro it's extra and I guess I'm trying to debate if the difference between the 2 computers is really worth the cost. I'd like for the new computer to last me 3-4 years maybe a bit longer so it's just a matter of which is better for my needs. Is the Mac Pro really worth it over the iMac? I know I cant replace anything in the iMac but if it can do me for awhile I don't see why that'd be a downside
The other factor is, buying at the end of october, is it wise or should I try and get as much life out of my dead PC and try and wait for the next iMac/Mac Pro refresh?
Thank you to everyone who replies with their opinions.

The biggest advantage of the MacPro is its expandability. Yes, it is faster too, but is the speed difference worth the extra cost? Looking at what you can expand in a MacPro (unlike PCs which can be swapped out component by component until nothing but the case is original equipment) I decided that expandability was too limited to be worth the price and the speed increase wasn't either.
In the past I'd bought a Mac tower and kept it 5 years, over those five years upgrading the graphics card, swapping out the CPU, bigger drives, etc. I looked at the MacPro and concluded there wasn't much I would or could do to expand it other than a bigger hard drive or more hard drives and more memory. Maybe a better graphics card. Meanwhile, I could buy an iMac, keep it for 2 1/2 years, sell it, buy a new iMac and keep it for 2 1/2 years and wind up spending less (thanks to the high resale values of Macs).

HELP Deciding between Windows laptops and OS X MacBook Pro!

I'm going to college this coming fall and am in the market for a new laptop to bring with me. I've been debating between PC laptops and Apple laptops for months now. This all started with the release of the MBP and its Intel Duo processor. In short, the new MBP's intrigue me.
So, I ask for help with deciding between the two. I'm very used to Windows XP; I have a Dell desktop and a Sony Vaio laptop. I do know the basics of
OS X because we use them at my high school.
My main question is, Why should I make the jump from Windows to Apple/
OS X?
Also, I have looked at several other notebooks, comparing features with prices. The 15.4" MBP is running at $2000. For the same price, I can get a similar Windows laptop with more technical features (more GB hard drive/more RAM).
MAC-80GB HD ; 512MB DDR2 RAM
SONY NOTEBOOK-100GB HD ; 1GB DDR2 RAM
Is the Apple notebook slower? I just have many questions, and I hope someone is able to answer at least a few and "teach me" the Apple way. Any help is appreciated!!
Windows XP

Hi, eightnotes. welcome to the forum.
In my opinion, there are several reasons why you should make the jump.
The first and biggest reason is the user experience, i.e. ease of use and low-maintenance OS. You're familiar with Windows, so you know you almost need to have a degree in computer science to properly secure, protect and maintain a Windows pc against internet threats. The Mac OS is not so threatened, so you will spend less time and energy worrying about it, securing it, and fixing it when it breaks.
Another reason is the way that Mac OS X is well integrated to fit the hardware that runs it. I've always believed that one of Windows biggest weaknesses is the fact that computer manufacturers must properly engineer their hardware to conform to the requirements of Windows OS. Of course, some are better than others, and God help you if you have a problem. "Who ya gonna call?". If it's OS X on Macintosh, you're gonna call Apple.
And finally, I think Apple provides the best suite of software that a consumer can get for everyday use. iLife (with iPhoto, iTunes, iMovie, iDVD and Garage Band) is simply the best at digital photos, music and video. If you need more than that, add iWork or MS Office for the writing and publishing... add other third party apps for other things and you're still using excellent, solid apps.
There you go! Three very good reasons (IMHO) why you should make the jump.
And here's one more for good measure. The ability to run Windows XP natively (and maybe Vista next year) on the newest Intel-based Macs. If you make the switch and just can't seem to tear yourself away from the dark side that is Windows, then you can always visit it from the comfort of your couch and your lap with your new MacBook Pro and Boot Camp.
So, even though the price may seem greater for the MacBook Pro, once you factor in all the advantages and factor out the hassles, the MacBook Pro is the way to go.
I hope this is helpful.
Regards... d.i.

Need help deciding which adobe product to purchase (Photoshop or Illustrator)

hello,
I am about to be given the task of creating the graphics for my company on a specific task.
We recently got a new printer to create cards with and before now, everyone has been running into trouble getting clean, accurately colored prints for these cards, and I am being given the task of creating them and need to decide what program I will need to achieve this.
What happens, is a company orders a set of cards and sends their graphic, which I will be receiving at a different size than will be needed for printing, so I need to enlarge it, which distorts the colors.
Also, on almost all of the images, I will be needing to add some words to the graphic before printing it, like the company name or address etc. but then occasionally, I am given some general images and generic instructions which I need to follow in order to create the graphic.
So, I was thinking that photoshop would help me to refill the colors after resizing an image, or when I need to create the graphic mostly myself, yet I will be having difficulty creating the words required.
But then illustrator would be giving me excelent fonts and words since its a vector program, yet I believe I will run into problems colorizing my graphics once resized.
So, what does everyone think would be the better option here?
Or what would be a good work around for either photoshop or illustrator that would help me resolve the problems arrising because I do not have the other?
Or what are some other potential problems I might possibly run into?

Well exactally,
Being the economic misfortune that hit the country, my company doesn't have the funds to pay for a professional and they are trying to find a way to keep the project inside the building.
me being 20 years old and wishing to pursue a career in graphic design sees this as a great opportunity to learn alot about printmaking as well as how to use graphic editing programs on a level higher than taught in school.
My boss is wanting me, and going to pay for me, to go under several hours of training to accomplish what needs to be done, but like I said, I am given the task of trying to figure out what kind of software I am going to need for the task, which is why I am here asking about the programs.
Also, it is kind of my first attempt at trying to further understand exactally what each of the programs do, and so far, I have learned quite alot by searching around and asking what other people think.
So, If you don't find it to be too hard to put your opinions or thoughts about how I could best accomplish creating the cleanest cards I would greatly appreciate it.
Sincerely,
BeeHiver

Help deciding between 13.3 MBP 2010 2.66 GHz C2D vs 13.3 MBP 2011 2.3GHz i5

Here is the deal and I hope I can get a quick response:
* I am deciding between the MBP 13.3 2010 2.66 GHz vs MBP 2011 2.3 GHz i5.
What I need:
* Most intensive stuff would be using photoshop and or primier once in a while.
What I like about the new MBP 2011:
* i5 outperforms C2D when it comes to video encoding, filter processing, etc.
What really concerns me about MBP 2011:
* Persistent heating issue complains.
* 320M being better than HD 3000 for image processing/editing.
While performace matters, so does the longevetiy of the laptop. With so many heating issues, will MBP 2011 be a good buy, so should I stick with the tested and proven MBP 2010?
Thank you.

Hi tjk,
Thanks for your input. The price is not really that much of a factor since a refurb 2010 model is almost the same price as the new 13.3 i5 MBP. I agree that performance generates heat, but lots of discussion here has been on consistent kicking in of fans in the newer model which generally seems to be running hot even with less intensive usage. Anyone with the newer model and lion can shine some light on if the issue has been fixed with the newer updates?Thanks!

IMac - Need help deciding.

Hello Forumers.
Bit of a dilema here, I was so chuffed to see the new iMacs untill I realised they dont support "Target input" from PS3 or TV etc ..
Well correction they do but only through Thunderbolt, which there is no adapter that allows this connectivity to happen. (Yet??).
The reason I wanted an iMac was simply to get rid of my windows pc and monitor and my HDTV and have an iMac that would allow me to do everything as I dont have mass's of space in my room.
Should I wait and see what adapters appear? Do I grab the old iMac now its surely down in price?...
Also I hear the 2010 version iMac 21.5 inchers lagg alot more when using an input device with them from a PS3 than the 27 sized 2010 iMacs.
Your thoughts please.
Thanks.

1) It is probably a lot better than the x1600 even though it shares the system RAM.
2) No it mostly uses the CPU for crunching.
3) This is normal and does not necessarily have to do with it being integrated graphics. It has to do with the it being in such a small space with little air movement. The older white iMacs run cooler than the newer Aluminum iMacs in general. It has nothing to do with the graphics processor and everything to do with the overall design. Most of the ALU iMacs I have used stay very quiet even when they are running hot.
George

Need help deciding between iMac or Display

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for