Negative Qty has genereted in 914 even though I've enough stock is available

Hi Every Body,
When I confirm the Production Order, system has generating the negative stock in 914 even though I've enough stock.
Scenario :- I've total 100 qty in my bin out of 100, I've set 20 qty as Blocked qty. when confirm the PO with 50 qty system generates the negative stock which I don't want to happen,  My question is why system is creating negative qty even though I've enough qty(80) to consume.
Please help me...
// Nagesh

Hello Nageswararao,
If you wanted to confirm from a particular bin, then you need to do following setting.
1 Enable WM-PP Interface active.
2 Update all your production Order item level - Supply Area & Storage Location.
3 Create Control Cycles using LPK1/LPK2/LPK3 for the Supply Area/Material/Plant Combination.
4 Enable back-flush in BOM/Material level
In your case, you have missed the control cycles. Control Cycle is the one which supplies the Production Bin from where the stock needs to be consumed. Hope, This is should solve your problem.
In future, any WM related questions, please do post in Logistics General(Previously Warehouse Management) Forum.
Regards,
Sathish

Similar Messages

  • Purchase requisition is re-created even though their is enough stock.

    Hi Experts,
    we have got a problem with a material. Although sufficient Purchase orders in place to cover all demand, it keeps creating additional purchase requisitions. If purchase requisitions are then deleted they would be automatically be re-created overnight. I cannot see anything wrong within the material master. Can you please advice where we are going wrong on this one?
    It would be appreciable if you explain briefly

    Hi,
    What is the stock at the end of the two weeks lot?. I have checked the lot size Weekly (As I do not have so many forecast data)
    and it works like this
    15.02.2011     Stock                                                            13      13
    15.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            4-     9
    16.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            6-     3
    17.02.2011     SolPed     0010003545/00010               17      20
    17.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            5-     15
    18.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            3-     12
    19.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            5-     7
    20.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            7-     0
    21.02.2011     SolPed     0010003546/00010               35      35
    21.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            5-     30
    22.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            5-     25
    23.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            5-     20
    24.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            5-     15
    25.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            5-     10
    26.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            5-     5
    27.02.2011     NecNPr                                                            5-     0
    The MRP at the end of the period finish with zero stock. But in order to finish with zero stock the MRP should create a Purchase Requisition (Solped as I am working in spanish!!! Sorry for not changing the Language!!) Material Is planned with MRP Type PD and Lot size WB (Weekly!)
    Can you provide you MD04 Result?
    Kind regards,
    Federico.

  • Ipod touch won't sync all of the music even though there is enough free space

    my ipod touch won't sync all of the music even though there is enough free space. what can i do to make sure all of the music syncs?

    Seen this tech note?
    Syncing music to iPod or iPhone - Apple Support

  • Order is going on credit hold even though the letter of credit is available

    The order is going on credit hold even though the letter of credit is available for the sales document.
    New Value of docuemnt is 7 USD
    Credit limit 100,000 USD
    Total credit exposure: 22,825,113.81 USD
    Letter of credit value: 10,000.00 USD
    Why the document is going on hold? what all settings need to be checked

    Dear Customer,
    please check you customizing settings with note 18613 concerning the credit management.
    Addionally you should get an information in the order (if you save the order) why the credit limit is not fullfilled.
    regards
    Claudia

  • When I synch my ipod touch it only lets 50 videos get on ipod . I can't get the other videos on even though there's plenty of space available and it's set to synch all movies

    When I synch my ipod touch it only lets 50 videos get on ipod . I can't get the other videos on even though there's plenty of space available and it's set to synch all movies. What am I missing?

    i had the same problem. did a lot of research..my phone became unusuable. do you use the htc mail? if so that is your problem. there is a bug with it that it keeps eating your memory until you cannot use your phone. i had to do a hard reset. back to factory condition..not happy! but then went to the marketplace and got k-9 mail. that is now my default mail program. i have not had any issues since then. this is what i kept reading over and over for complaints on this phone. it is a major glitch and the only way, as of the time it happened to me, to fix it..

  • Will songs that were previously purchased in itunes always be available even though they may no longer be available in itunes?

    will songs and videos purchased in itunes always be available for download even though it may no longer be available in itunes?

    Thank You,ThankYou, Thank You!!!!!!
    I did not believe that it could be so easy, there were a few ringtones missing, but it does not matter. I did not know that was the way to do it, I thought that I had lost everything.
    Again Thank You, I will look into your feedbacks again, when I have another problem.
    Penny 

  • Events has incorrect date range even though photos have been correctly adjusted

    I'm using iPhoto '11 (9.1.2) and have imported a bunch of old photos that had incorrect exif data, presumably from the camera having the wrong date set at the time.  For example I have an event called "Christmas 08" which contained photos dated from 4-6 Dec 2028; which I've since deduced were actually taken 4-6 Jan 2008.  Knowing that iPhoto can correct this sort of error I used the Photos > Adjust date and time menu option to take over 7200 days off the images and overwrite the originals into the bargain.  Initially the results looked good - all the photos from the 26 affected events now show the correct date information in the info panel and when one of the events is selected the date range shown in the info panel reflects the new date range of the photos within it. 
    Weirdly though, the dates shown underneath the event are still the 2028 dates and the event is still ordered chronologically after my recent 2011 photos - consequently these events are considered "within the last 12 months" by iTunes even though the photos are all correctly identified as around 2.5 years old. Presumably this will mean that these events are set float at the top of my events list and plague me for the next 17 years unless this gets fixed.
    What should I be doing to make iPhoto do the right thing?
    Thanks,
    Rob

    This has been reported several times in iPhoto '11 version 9.1.2 - it appears to be a bug - the only reported workaround that has been posted is to correct the dates on the photos and create a new event with them - try flagging all of the photos in the bad event after the dates are correct and then create a new event from the flagged photos
    You can search the forums to see the other discussions
    I would expect a correction in a future upgrade
    do report to Apple - iPhoto menu ==> provide iPhoto feedback
    LN

  • I logged out of my itunes and now it won't let me log back in. it says the request has timed out.. even though my internet is connected

    The itunes store will not let me log in, it says that the request has timed out even though my internet is connected and my username and password are correct

    I am having the same problem. It keeps saying that I have no internet connection, but I DO!

  • App won't unzip file even though touch shows enough space

    An easy one, I hope. My Reading Ally audiobook app won't unzip a 383mb file even though my touch shows more than 2 gb of space available. The app presents a message saying not enough space available. Any help appreciated.

    I can't find any app called "Reading Ally". Do you perhaps mean Learning Ally? If so, are you using the lateset version of the app? Have you tried restarting your iPod (a full restart, from the "swipe to turn off"). Note that according to the company, the app does not work with Learning Ally WMAdownloadable (AudioAccess) books. They also say that if you have downloaded books prior to February 28, 2011 you will need to re-downloadthese titles. 
    If that's not the app you're referring to, please confirm the actual title of the app.
    Regards.

  • Data being truncated in output - even though field large enough

    I have a rdf report. I see that one of the columns is not displayed completely - even though it is big enough to accomodate the data that is being returned from the query. I increased the size of the field in the designer - still the data is being truncated. What could be going on here?

    beside the enlargment of the visible area of the column in the layout editor, You should also increase the width property of that column from the property inspector.
    Regards
    Mostafa

  • ORA-01654 even though there is enough space

    I'm getting a
    ORA-01654: unable to extend index ECD_ADHOC.BOT_PK by 35064 in tablespace ECD_INDEX
    even though
    select nvl(b.tablespace_name, nvl(a.tablespace_name, 'UNKOWN')) name,
    kbytes_alloc kbytes,
    kbytes_alloc - nvl(kbytes_free, 0) used,
    nvl(kbytes_free, 0) free,
    ((kbytes_alloc - nvl(kbytes_free, 0)) / kbytes_alloc) * 100 pct_used,
    nvl(largest, 0) largest
    from (select sum(bytes) / 1024 Kbytes_free,
    max(bytes) / 1024 largest,
    tablespace_name
    from sys.dba_free_space
    group by tablespace_name) a,
    (select sum(bytes) / 1024 Kbytes_alloc, tablespace_name
    from sys.dba_data_files
    group by tablespace_name) b
    where a.tablespace_name(+) = b.tablespace_name and
    b.tablespace_name = 'ECD_INDEX'
    shows me
    NAME KBYTES     USED     FREE     PCT_USED     LARGEST
    ECD_INDEX     9937166     8676400     1260766     87.3126201172447     69958
    What can be the reason? And how can I solve this problem?
    Thanks in Advance
    Marco

    SELECT TABLESPACE NAME FROM USER_INDEXES
    WHERE INDEX_NAME = '&INDEX_NAME'; 
    -- provide the index_name that is failing to get extent allocation
    Based on the tablespace named from the top, ask your DBA to:
    ALTER TABLESPACE <tablespace_name_from_above_query>
    ADD DATAFILE 'full directory path within quotes with a file name'
    SIZE <a reasonable size in MBs denoted with the letter M>

  • My service has been turned off even though I returned phone?

    I am so unhappy with Verizon! I have been a Verizon customer (loyal) for over 13 years now. I always loved them, bragged about them, encouraged friends, family and clients to sign up with them as well. Until last year. I sucked it up every time I upgraded my phone and they took away privileges (unlimited this or that......) because I thought that is the way everyone is going now. I was so excited to use my upgrade in October of 2012. I was counting the days! Literally on my calendar! I originally ordered the new i-Phone 5 until I heard I could get the 4 for free. So, 4 days before I was slated to receive my new 5, I ordered the 4 instead. Biggest mistake EVER! First of all, I had a Droid X, which I LOVED, but I bought my daughter the i-Phone 4 for Christmas the year before and I wanted the ability to Facetime with her. Also, my coworkers also had i-Phones, so when a group text went out, I got tired of downloading each message separately.
    My i-Phone never held a charge longer than 7-8 hours right out of the box! My daughters lasts 2 days new, easily. Even after a year, it still lasted longer than my brand new one. The sound is barely audible on the highest volume. So, couldn't use my alarm at all. Too quiet. Missed a ton of phone calls for work because I couldn't hear it ringing. In addition to being self-employed and working full-time, I was also enrolled in college full-time, a single mom, etc. No time to be on hold, just to be disconnected.....but that is what happened! Not only did I not get service anywhere on campus (my Droid got service everywhere except the middle of one building), I could not call Verizon customer service between classes. At work, I am too busy (hairstylist) so when I DID have more than a minute, I tried calling Verizon.
    The first time I called, I must have pushed the wrong button at the end of the auto-you-pick-maze. Hung up. Client showed up and was too busy the next two days to call again. Second call: got through and she said she would connect me to the right department and I got an out of service message. You know, the kind with the 3 raising beep, beep, beeps? This number is no longer in service etc.........Weird. No time to call til the next day. FINALLY got ahold of someone! SO happy! He told me to call from another number and he was looking at my phone somehow (weird, but ok) and I was on the phone with him for 20 minutes and had to get to class. (Remember how I said my phone didn't work on campus?) The gentleman from Verizon PROMISED to call me back at an agreed upon time and never did! I told him how hard it is for me to make time and the difficulties I have had with trying to get through and he promised!!
    By then, so fed up, was ready to cancel my Verizon account and transfer to the competitor. Decided when I had time (after the quarter was finished and holidays over) that I would go into the store and deal with it. Of course by now, it had been too long so they said they would give me a $90 credit for my i-Phone (they swore it wasn't refurbished and they would NEVER sell a used one as new but now I don't believe it) and I could pay the difference on another phone. Not happy but desperate to get a phone that worked, I chose a cheaper Droid. The Samsung Stellar. When I told my daughter they charged me $250 for that phone, she was furious! She said that was a total rip off. Even worse, when the new phone arrived, it was not even new! It was refurbished. Whatever. STILL desperate to have a working phone, I followed the directions to activate it. It never activated. The running circle on the screen went round and round and never stopped.
    I am SO OVER THIS!!!! I brought it down to FedEx and shipped it back. During the billing cycle in between, I paid my normal bill minus the replacement phone charge. On Saturday, I get a message from Verizon saying they are turning my phone off (can't remember the exact terminology they used) if I did not bring my account current. Through another maze of automated-you-pick-menus, I was able to choose a button that told them my overdue payment was in the mail. Technically, it was. Tonight, no service on my phone. Checked FedEx tracking number and they received the phone yesterday!! I AM SO FED UP!!!
    Now, I am reading the forums and realize I am one of MANY who this has happened to and it looks like the fun is just getting started. Looks like they will say the box is empty first (as per other reviews on here) then, after a couple months, they will "find" the phone..........I am still stuck with a ****  i-Phone 4. I never thought Verizon would treat me this way.  Guess this is what happens when a company gets too powerful. They don't care about the customers anymore. I think I am going to bite the bullet, pay the early termination fee and never look back. I hear AT&T is offering a great deal for new customers right now............
    << Edited to comply with Verizon Wireless Terms of Service >>
    Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

        Hey Salonsister.  I want to start off by saying I admire all that you do as a single mother.  That is awesome that you are able to go to school full time, have a full time job, and raise a family. You truly are a hard working person, keep up the great work.  With all the hard work you do, we absolutely want to do everything we can to make this easier on you.
    I am sorry to learn about all the phone issues you have been having.  The iPhone 4 is a great device and I truly am sorry to hear that it gave you so many issues.  I completely understand that you are busy, but I am confident that if given the chance to troubleshoot that we would have been able resolve the issues you were having.
    The Samsung Stellar you purchased was most likely a Certified Pre Owned device.  If you were not upgrade eligible this would have been your least expensive option.  The phone at full retail is $329.99 so by going with a Certified Pre Owned device you saved $100.00. For more information on the Certified Pre Owned program please visit http://vz.to/rcDvLW.
    I understand that it didn't activate, but again if given the chance to troubleshoot I am positive we could have gotten that up and running for you.
    When you shipped the device back? Did you ship it back within the 14 day Worry Free Guarantee? When purchasing a device or an accessory you have 14 days to return the device from the point of purchase for a full refund.
    If you let a balance run past due, you do run the risk of having your services interrupted. I know you returned the phone and all, but that balance was due as a part of that bill which was due on whichever date your bills are normally due.  The adjustment would than appear on the next bill.
    Did you receive an alert that the device was received? If not, did we file an investigation for you?
    We truly do care salonsister and it would be sad to see you go. I am here to assist and I know we can get this straightened out for you. Please provide additional details to the questions I asked and I will continue to assist.
    NickB_VZW
    VZWSupport
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • Removed user from group, user no longer has access to documents even though user is owner of documents

    I'm running a server 2012 std domain and I'm in the process of rebuilding our fileserver after we had some pretty serious permission issues. Bad permissions (Everyone had full access to user documents share) were migrated when we move to the new server and
    then by some strange Monday morning freak out all users lost access to their documents. I restored from backups, redirected everyone's folders back to local computer and started to reconfigure the share permissions. I moved our administration group back to
    the server after securing proper permissions for folder redirection (permissions copied from https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj649078.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396 table 1, only difference is instead of creating a new security group
    for redirection users, I used the everyone group) to test and everything went perfectly. The GPO created the users folders under the root and redirection was good to go. Along with that, other users cannot access other users documents anymore which was the
    intended outcome. 
    Last night I was looking at security groups and see that our administration group (back office group: accounting, HR, etc..) was a member of the domain admins. I removed them from the domain admins group and added them to the administrators group (they do
    need regular admin access) then went on like normal. This morning, all users in that group can no longer access their documents on the server. I immediately think that permissions were broken again and started to get angry, but then realize that all the files
    are still accessible on the server (no lost permissions like before) and the user is still shown as the owner with full permissions, but the files are inaccessible to those users. I re-added them to the domain admins group, logged out, logged back in and documents
    are back and accessible by the user. Remove them from the domain admins group, log out, log back in and the documents are inaccessible again. Re-add to the domain admins group and back to normal. 
    Which leads me to now. If the users are part of the domain admins group, they have access to their files. If they are removed from the domain admins group, they lose access. When they lose access, they are still the owners of the files/folders with full
    permissions, yet they can't access their documents. Also, just to add, the domain admins group has no specified permissions on the files or folders. See screenshots below..
    Here is the root share. 
    And the user's desktop folder. The folder is owned by the user with full permissions. This is the folder the redirection GPO created.
    Any ideas why removing the group from domain admins would drop access to their files? They are still the owners of the files and should have full access but they don't. Is there something I'm not seeing here?

    Effective Access shows the user has full control of the Desktop folder
    This is a problem with the Effective Access tab when using CREATOR OWNER.  As you have noticed, the user doesn't really have the access that the tab says it does.  This is because of how CREATOR OWNER works.
    CREATOR OWNER is only evaluated when a file/folder is created. 
    IF a user can create a file/folder, then the permissions assigned to CREATOR OWNER are copied to a new permissions entry for that user.
    To see this:
    Logon as an administrator and create a file in the Desktop folder in your screenshot.
    Examine the permissions of the new file.
    You'll see that there is a new entry for the account you logged on with.
    CREATOR OWNER is gone.  CREATOR OWNER would still be there if you created a folder (because of "subfolders and files").
    In the Desktop folder (in your screenshot), only SYSTEM and Administrator can create/access files.
    To fix this, you need to grant the users the ability to list the directory contents and create new files/folders.  This corresponds with the suggestion of Table 1 in the document you found.
    I see what you're saying about Administrators domain group. I'll just add them as local admins via GPO and that should solve that issue. 
    No, scary!  This will grant those users administrative permission on your server.  They will be able to see any file anywhere on that server.
    If your goal is to provide a place that is private for each user, then the simplest approach is to grant each user permission to their own folder.  Like this for Test User:
    Notes for above:
    I set the user's permission to Modify because there is no good reason why the user should change these permissions
    The owner of this folder is unimportant.  I leave it set to Administrators
    You can, and I do, remove CREATOR OWNER.  It adds no value in this situation and just causes confusion.
    As for the second screen shot, the *-Admins folder is the root to which Everyone has special permissions on and can create folders. The folder for M* was created by the GPO, which makes M* the owner to which they have Full control of subfolders and files.
    The GPO also created the Desktop folder, giving owner full permissions of subfolders and files. Inside the Desktop folder, permissions remain Full control for owner for subfolders and files. Even if it was the case that they only had permissions on subfolders
    and files, wouldn't each subfolder under that one be considered a subfolder and file of the top folder?
    If this works as you say, then Yes, it should work.  But, I don't see the entries for use M*.  Remember, there should be entries for the M* user that is a duplicate of CREATOR OWNER.
    I suspect that Group Policy is creating the directories (elevated) and then changing the owner to M* afterward.  This does not duplicate the CREATOR OWNER entries as needed.  If this is the case, I consider it a flaw because your permissions do
    not allow user M* to create files/folders, and group policy shouldn't bypass security.
    I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just curious why the technet article would advise Creator/Owner giving full control of subfolders and files only if that were not correct. I can add the permissions for the users easily, I just don't see why I need to give
    explicit permissions to access something when the GPO created those folders for me, which Microsoft recommends you allow. If the GPO can create folders and the folders are owned by the user, then the user can obviously add/create/modify/view those files and
    folders. 
    When I restored the data, no permission were reset. Permissions were restored to the wonky version where the Everyone group has full access to everything. Ownership of the files/folders remained the same.
    A couple things:
    The article instructed the use of Folder Redirection Users group that had permissions to create files.  Your examples didn't have that.  Because of this, your user could create new files.
    The article assumes that the directories you are creating will be empty.  Existing files will be unreadable to everyone except Admins.
    If you follow the directions in the article, then anyone in the Folder Redirection Users group can write files to anyone else's directory.
    One benefit of the document's approach is that all the users could be redirected to the same folder using the article, and it would work.  A benefit, I guess.
    But, I like my user's separate and unable to see each other's files -- at all.  This is why I recommend replacing CREATOR OWNER with the specific user.
    I believe this document is a "how to get it done" document, not necessarily a best practices document.  I see it as a starting point, and that's why I didn't follow it exactly.
    Lastly, CREATOR OWNER permissions are useful but confusing.  I avoid them unless I have the rare circumstance where they are perfect.
    When I restored the data, no permission were reset. Permissions were restored to the wonky version where the Everyone group has full access to everything. Ownership of the files/folders remained the same.
    To summarize:
    In the user's directory, you need to provide permission to list and create new files/folders, and you need grant the user permission to the existing files.
    -Tony

  • MailBox Says it has 953MB used space even though its EMPTY!!

    I have an iPhone 5 and recently I have checked my Usage to see what is taking up the most space and my Mail says it has 953MB of used space. My mailbox is competely empty. I emptied the Trash folder, I emptied the Drafts folder, I emptied the Sent folder yet my mail still says it has 953MB of used space. I do not have any email in my Could service either. To add to the confusion every time I go to my MailBox to check for mail 1MB will add to my total used space in my MailBox... i.e. if I go to my Mail right now then go to my Usage it will show 954MB being used not 953MB like it says right now. Does anyone else have this issue? How the heck do I completely empty my mailbox and how do I stop 1MB from being added to my mailbox usage space every time I open my MailBox? What is going on here????

    moving stuff to trash doesn't remove it from a drive. It puts it in a hidden .Trash folder on that drive. you have to empty trash to reclaim space. even easier would be to reformat the drive if you have a lot of stuff to erase.

  • HT4061 My iPhone 5 has suddenly stopped charging even though I have used different cables and adaptors. The cables adaptors charge another phone so nothing wrong at that end

    My iPhone 5 has suddenly stopped charging. Have used three different cables and adaptors to no avail. The cables charge other phones so something wrong with the phone only. Need advice on possible solutions?

    Always try
    a reset then
    a restore first with back up then as new ,as required
    If still no improvement visit Apple Store genius bar
    BUT first check there is no debris in charging socket

Maybe you are looking for