NetBeans6 UML code generation

Hi I am trying to generate code from some UML diagrams in Netbeans 6. I selected the objects I want to generate code from, then right-clicked on the objects selected, from the menu I need to choose generate code option. But there is no generate code option available.
Can anyone help me with this.
thanks.
Richard.

Please post NetBeans questions and requests at the NetBeans website mailing list.
These forums support the Java language, not NetBeans and other IDEs.

Similar Messages

UML code generation

Hi,
I'm developing an application of ~50+ classes in UML on JSE8 and use java code generation.
The question is about aggregations.
Navigable aggregations translate in java code to a class attribute, and to the corresponding getter/setters-methods.
A non-navigable aggregation is not translated to java code at all.
( I would expect it should translate to an attribute, but without getter/setters.
My understanding is, "navigable" means "navigable from outside the class". Correct?)
So how can I model an aggregation, which translates to an attribute in java, without generating the getters/setters?
And where can I find a comprehensive list of how elements in class diagrams are translated to java code?
Where is the JSE8-UML-manual, which includes all these details about UML code generation?
Thanks a lot for any useful hint!

Hi,
actually, the code generator is correct.
A non-navigable association should not generate an attribute.
Consider the example:
class Order -> class Date
You have navigation from class order to class date, but not otherwise.
This means that, given a Order object, you can find it's associated Date.
However, the inverse is not true: given a Date object you have no means of "navigating" or finding out which Order objects would have that date. This is what navigation means.
This should be translated into something like this
class Order{
Date theDate;
class Date{
int day, whatever;
//no ref to order-non navigable
If navigation from both classes were possible, a much more complicated code would be needed. It would be something along these lines, considering a 1-1 association (a *-1 association would require multiple order references to be stored at Date, with yet more complications):
class Order{
Date theDate;
void setDate(Date d)
theDate=d;
d.setOrder(this);
class Date{
int day,whatever;
Order theOrder; //navigation to order
void setOrder(Order o)
theOrder=o;
Care should be taken to ensure proper consistency between references (ie: the order in date should never be changed without making a corresponding change to the new order object).
All this serves to show, you should use navigation sparringly (as needed) , otherwise you're just complicating your code more than you should.
Greets
Jorge

UML & Code Generation (RAD)

Hey everyone,
I'm evaluating Java IDE's right now and I'm working with a group that uses a tool called Popkin to do their design in UML. I'm trying to find a Java IDE that can import (via XMI) those diagrams to do the code generation.
Rational and TogetherSoft have integrated environments that couple the code and design (As you code, the UML is updated and as you create UML, the code is updated, etc.)
I'm wondering though, if you use something like JBuilder, how can you import the UML from another tool? Has anyone messed with Popkin before or tried to integrate something like this?
Thanks,
Will

bump
i don't care about this topic any longer, but need to give out a duke dollar, first one to respond wins!

Preventing Netbean's UML code generation problem

When I generate code from my UML diagram in netbeans, how do I prevent it from making a local version of java api classes and interfaces?
Example: I have classes that extend JFrame. When I generate the code, it puts and an empty JFrame class in my source package.

This is a Java forum and not a Netbeans one.

Automatic Code generation from UML for C++ in Visual Studio 2013 Ultimate

Hi all,
I am using Visual Studio 2013 Ultimate to design UML diagrams and want to use the class diagram to generate C++ code,
however I found that there seems only support C# generation.
Is there any way to do the code generation (even round-trip engineering with C++/UML model) from Visual Studio 2013 Ultimate?
There is a way to do C++ code generation by customize the text template file right? but it is time consuming and we don't have much time to do it.:(
Thanks a lot!

Hello Grib,
>>is there anyway to integrate an STE code generator to Visual Studio 2013. I know there is EF5.x STE Generator but only for VS 2012.
Yes, you can.
Since the STEs are T4 template and you can just take template and code any changes or improvements you require yourselves! As you mentions, there is a EF5.x STE generator, you could download it and edit it. You could check this article:
Upgrading to EF6, we could see that from EF5 to EF6, the team moves classes to a new namespace, so we need to modify the T4 template to generate the new namespace.
Regards.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

UML associations and code generation don't work

Hello,
I've maid a Class Diagramm in JSE 8, class generation works great, but I have a problem with associations : they are not generated (ie no attributes in class files). I've tried to give association name and also named both ends, but nothing better.
Thanks for your help.
PS : navigable association seems to work great.

Thanks for your valuable feedback and sorry for the inconvenience.
I already submitted a request for enhancement (RFE) for automatic code generation for Association links. As for the documentation issue, I'm not able to replicate your problem. I'm seeing all comments in the source that I entered in the documentation panel. Could you please kindly provide me detail steps to reproduce the case that you don't see documentation generated in the code and I'll try to help you. Thanks!
--Peter

Uml code development

can you develop forms from uml tools like rational for example? -- and can that code be managed ?
am attending this online seminar
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;5756991;8195099;i?http://www.rational.com/events/forms/webinar-reg.jsp?EVENTID=2774
but not sure if they cover oracle forms.. anyone?
thank,s
joe

The only modeling tool that generates Oracle Forms is Oracle Designer.
http://otn.oracle.com/products/designer/content.html
Oracle has UML support and code generation from UML to Java in the Oracle9i JDeveloper tool.
http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/content.html

Error in code generation for deleting table BUT000_TD

Hi,
Did anyone encounter this error while working on EEWB ?
I created the project extension via EEWB and completed the wizard setting with the package (dev. class) value as $temp as I wanted to test it locally.
One of the errors, that I got is:
Error in code generation for deleting table BUT000_TD
    Message no. DA464
Diagnosis
    This error message indicates that internal inconsistencies exist.
Procedure
    Please consult SAP.

Hi,
As I mentioned in my previous post kindly check the consistency of the structure BUT000_TD.
Regards,
Sudheer.

Error during distribution for compiled code generation-Reply

Hi,
Looking at your error messages, it looks as though your build is failing during the code generation phase of an autocompilation. To determine why the code generator crashed, either look in the $FORTE_ROOT/log/forte_ex*.log files or don't use autocompilation and use fcompile.
There are many reasons why the code generator could crash. Some of the things I've come across are running out of memory and trying to find invalid classes.
If its the invalid class problem you'll find a message like:
Generating code for partition BLTCustomWindow_cl0_Part1.
ERROR: Exiting due to following exception:
SYSTEM ERROR: Client partition FTCompile_cl0_Client was terminated by escaped
exception. See the remainder of the error stack for more information.
Class: qqsp_ResourceException
Error #: [1001, 3]
Detected at: qqrt_ForteExecAgent::LoadPartition at 1
Error Time: Tue Aug 18 17:52:44
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1, taskId =
[9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1.6]) in application
"FTCompile_cl0", pid 28331 on node stardev in environment <unknown>.
FATAL ERROR: Invalid class ProductBMServices.ProductSecurityMgrProxy
(0x4ecd,0x19a)
Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
Detected at: qqcg_TRclass::SetClass at 2
Last TOOL statement: method ForteCompiler.ProcessPGF
Error Time: Tue Aug 18 17:52:44
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Forte_Executor",
(partitionId = 9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1, taskId =
[9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1.6]) in application
"FTCompile_cl0", pid 28331 on node stardev in environment <unknown>.
The solution for this instance is to clean up the invalid classes using the c4tstdrv utility.
c4tstdrv > setrepos star8
c4tstdrv > setwork dmcompiledbuild
c4tstdrv > open
Type Service Flags Level
err sh * 255
trc rp 1 4
c4tstdrv > findproj productbmservices
c4tstdrv > cleanuprtclasses
Removing extraneous RTclass ProductShootingLocationMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass PRTerritoryBaseMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass PRTerritoryMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass TalentBaseMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass TalentTypeMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass TitleTypeBaseMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass TitleTypeMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityBaseClass
Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityBaseQuery
Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityQuery
Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityMgrProxy
c4tstdrv > commit
c4tstdrv > exit
Integrate the changes to the workspace, start the build again and this should have cured the problem.
However, its hard to know what the cause of your problem is without seeing the output in the log files.
Good luck.
Mark Carruthers
20th Century Fox
"Forte Consultants" <[email protected]> 01/22/99 08:35am >>>
Hi,
I'm doing application distribution for my application using a fscript
script and am forcing compilation on 2 of my partitions.
This I have been doing from quite sometime successfully. Recently I
developed a new service and plugged it into my application for
deployment.
I'm successfully able to distribute & deploy the interpreted code. But
I'm getting a long list of system errors when I try doing distribution
for compiled code. And I see only one of the .exe generated instead of
two because of which I'm unable to go ahead with installaion. I would
appreciate if anybody let me know why this's happening ?. The following
is the main chunk of this error list.
Thanks in advance.
--Anand Ramaswamy
SYSTEM ERROR: Cannot resolve the distributed reference for an object of
class
(qqlo_Object) named (<Unknown>) for the reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 144]
Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::ResolveOutGoingProxy at 10
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: Can not initially communicate with the object named
(Unnamed),
which is supposed to be in partition
(32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x616:0x1).
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 140]
Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::CheckAccess at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: Attempt to send to unknown destination partition
(32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x616:0x1).
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 102]
Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::SendMsg at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
Distributed method called: qqdo_InternalMessage.<Message> (object
name
Unnamed) from partition "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router",
(partitionId
= 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.2]) in application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: Partition (32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x616:0x1)
no
longer exists. The process associated with the partition probably
terminated.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::CheckStarted at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: This method invocation is being retried because the
failures
shown below and the fact that the dialog duration is MESSAGE. This is
try #2.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 54]
Detected at: qqdo_Message::Failed at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:19
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: The load balanced router is disabled or has no members.
This
can happen if all of the members terminated or failed.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 161]
Detected at: qqdo_LbRouter::Route at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:19
Distributed method called: GenerationMgrProxy.GeneratePartitionCode
(object name
site/codegenerationsvc_cl0/codegenerationsvc_cl0-codegensvc)
from partition "Fscript_cl9_Client", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614.2]) in application
"fscript",
pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: This method invocation is being retried because the
failures
shown below and the fact that the dialog duration is MESSAGE. This is
try #1.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 54]
Detected at: qqdo_Message::Failed at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: Access to a load balanced router member (which is a
service
object) failed for the reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 162]
Detected at: qqdo_LbRouter::Route at 2
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Distributed method called: GenerationMgrProxy.GeneratePartitionCode
(object name
site/codegenerationsvc_cl0/codegenerationsvc_cl0-codegensvc)
from partition "Fscript_cl9_Client", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614.3]) in application
"fscript",
pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV
Distributed method called: qqlo_Object.<Message> (object name
Unnamed)
from partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.12]) in application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: Cannot resolve the distributed reference for an object of
class
(qqlo_Object) named (<Unknown>) for the reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 144]
Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::ResolveOutGoingProxy at 10
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Distributed method called: qqlo_Object.<Message> (object name
Unnamed)
from partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.12]) in application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: This distributed reference was previously invalidated due
to the
reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 132]
Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::ResolveOutGoingProxy at 3
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: The connection to the partner was terminated by the
Communication
Manager for the reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::StopLocation at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: Asynchronous Failure: Recieved a close from the network
partner:
Internet Location - Host: moosup.iroquois.com Port Number: 2504 Dot:
193.1.11.26 %LINKDISCON, network partner disconnected logical link
Event 4
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: This method invocation is being retried because the
failures
shown below and the fact that the dialog duration is MESSAGE. This is
try #1.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 54]
Detected at: qqdo_Message::Failed at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: The connection to the partner was terminated by the
Communication
Manager for the reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::StopLocation at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Distributed method called: qqlo_Object.<Message> (object name
Unnamed)
from partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.12]) in application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: Asynchronous Failure: Recieved a close from the network
partner:
Internet Location - Host: moosup.iroquois.com Port Number: 2504 Dot:
193.1.11.26 %LINKDISCON, network partner disconnected logical link
Event 4
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Hi,
If this INCLUDE is in a function group go the MAIN program and activate from there.
Can you list out the include name?
a®

FPGA Code Generation fails with error codes 7 and -1

Hi all,
I have been having a weird issue with my LV FPGA compilation in the last couple of days, no matter what I try to compile LV fails to generate the FPGA code files and returns with errors 7 and -1 and complains that the file is not found. This happens no matter what I am trying to compile even a VI with just a while loop. I followed the discussion forum here without any luck, also followed the NI article here and that did not help either. The error codes always get generated at the start of the Generating Intermediate files step #7 (out of 7).
Attached to this post is a screenshot of the error I am getting (error -1 just says internal error and to contact NI support), bellow is basically the error I get for error code 7
An internal software error has occurred. Please contact National Instruments technical support at ni.com/support with the following information:
Error 7 occurred at Read from Text File in nirviGetInstantiation_cRIO-IDSel_Timer.vi->nirviGetInstantiation_cRIO-IDSel_Timer.vi.ProxyCaller
Possible reason(s):
LabVIEW: File not found. The file might have been moved or deleted, or the file path might be incorrectly formatted for the operating system. For example, use \ as path separators on Windows, : on Mac OS X, and / on Linux. Verify that the path is correct using the command prompt or file explorer.
=========================
NI-488: Nonexistent GPIB interface.
C:\NIFPGA\compilation\cRioController_8-SlotFPGA_FPGA-TriggerTest_C06156E2\IDSel_Timer.vhd
I tried to do some digging to see what could possibly be happening, and I noticed that LV is looking for the vhdl files in the wrong folder (see the line highlighted in red above), when generating the vhdl files, LV will place them inside the "source_files" folder under the compilation project, but for some reason it is trying to find them under the root folder not inside the source_files folder!!!
Does anyone have any idea why LV would be looking for these files in the wrong subfolder?
Thank you,
Aws
Attachments:
Code Generation Errors.png ‏35 KB

Hi Aws_Khudhair,
What version of LabVIEW are you using? And what version of the FPGA module? From what I found, it seems as though this is primarily an issue with LabVIEW 8.6 and 8.6.1.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/A711119FE89E39E78625754E00075E92
This forum also discusses a similar issue:
http://forums.ni.com/t5/Real-Time-Measurement-and/FPGA-compile-errors-after-generating-intemediate-f...
It may also be worth repairing/reinstalling the FPGA Module and the Xilinx compile tools.
Catherine B.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Generic oracle eway code generation error in Java caps 5.1.3

Hi,
I'm using an oracle eway for adding records to a table. I have a prepared statement in the otd. When I try to build the project I'm getting the following error. Could any one let me know how this problem can be fixed?
com.stc.codegen.framework.model.CodeGenException: Generic Oracle eway code generation error(ERROR_CODEGEN_GENERIC_CODELET_GENERAL)
     at com.stc.oracle.codegen.OracleEWayCodeletFactory$OracleEWayCodelet.generateFiles(OracleEWayCodeletFactory.java:1860)
     at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.CodeGenFrameworkImpl.processCodelets(CodeGenFrameworkImpl.java:640)
     at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.CodeGenFrameworkImpl.process(CodeGenFrameworkImpl.java:1544)
     at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.DeploymentVisitorImpl.process(DeploymentVisitorImpl.java:405)
     at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.DeploymentVisitorImpl.process(DeploymentVisitorImpl.java:308)
     at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.DeploymentVisitorImpl.traverseDeployment(DeploymentVisitorImpl.java:268)
     at com.stc.codegen.driver.module.DeploymentBuildAction.loadCodeGen(DeploymentBuildAction.java:923)
     at com.stc.codegen.driver.module.DeploymentBuildAction.access$1000(DeploymentBuildAction.java:174)
     at com.stc.codegen.driver.module.DeploymentBuildAction$1.run(DeploymentBuildAction.java:599)
     at org.openide.util.Task.run(Task.java:136)
     at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$Processor.run(RequestProcessor.java:599)
Caused by: com.stc.codegen.framework.model.CodeGenException: Exception when generating OTD code ...Exception: javaClass: Oracle_std_otdOTD: Exception when invoke DB Codegen Task...Exception: Invalid parameter type: Class : [Std_insert_PreapredStat] Object: [Param1] Param Type : [DECIMAL].(ERROR_CODEGEN_DB)(ERROR_CREATE_OTD)
     at com.stc.oracle.codegen.OracleEWayCodeletFactory$OracleEWayCodelet.generateOtdJarFile(OracleEWayCodeletFactory.java:2045)
     at com.stc.oracle.codegen.OracleEWayCodeletFactory$OracleEWayCodelet.generateFiles(OracleEWayCodeletFactory.java:1756)
     ... 10 more
Regards,
Abdul

hi...
i too getting same problem..how did u reslove this...
please help me out...
thanks in advance
KK

Mappings code generation : regular SQL / cursor PL/SQL

Hi,
When designing mappings, I fear that code generation can be potentially dangerous, because OWB automatically chooses the best method to generate the code (regular SQL or PL/SQL).
I am looking for some examples where code generation for a mapping:
- gives a regular SQL statement
- gives a cursor-based PL/SQL
- a small change in a mapping makes a regular SQL mapping to be transformed in a cursor-based PL/SQL
Thank you
Alexandre
Message was edited by:
Alexandre Abric

I have not said that different modes executes at the same way what the use to have different options if they actually mean the same, right? I have said that they produced the same result i.e. if you expect the mapping to insert 1000 rows from the source to the target it will be done no matter which operation mode you choose.
But by different ways. To keep it simple lets say that:
set base mode will result in:
insert into target ()
select from source;
row based will result in:
begin
for a in (select * from source) loop
insert into target
end loop;
end;
Now lets assume that 5 rows from those 1000 you are going to insert, will break some NOT NULL constraint at the target.
If you choose Set-base mode entire insert from select will fail resulting no rows is inserted into target. Audit trail will contain message like constraint violated and thats it. You will have to find bad records by yourself.
If you choose Row-base mode 995 rows will be inserted (depending on mapping configuration) into the target and 5 will be listed in audit trail with the same constraint violated message.
Thats why default operating mode is Set based fail over to Row based. That means OWB will try to execute mapping in the fastest way set based, but if it fail, it will try again to accomplish the task by running in row base mode, providing complete audit trail fro bad rows.

Enhanced Flash Builder Code Generation Functionality

For voting in JIRA:
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-27169
The code generation feature FB 4 currently has is only really useful for quick throwaway prototyping or very simple forms. The generation should allow you to configure formatting via default templates, AND optionally utilize a dialog box (similar to that used in refactoring but with a few extras) so that you can configure the contents of each generated function and provide appropriate function names according to coding best practices. For example:
-User initiates event handler generation
(Optional, if Codegen dialog is enabled)
-User is prompted with a dialog that allows them to customize the generated function name, and possibly specify whether they need an Event parameter passed to the function. (Default to NO event parameter, but this could be a pre-configured user option.)
-FB utilizes the customized code generation format (customizable by the developer) to generate the new function
If you need a "submitForm()" function and you want both a TextInput's enter action and a button's click action to call it, currently you're better off typing it all yourself, because auto-generation is going to put this long-named function that assumes you need 'event' passed to it. An event:MouseEvent parameter just gets in the way when you also want a TextInput's enter event to call that function, for example. Or perhaps we want to provide a more descriptive name to each handler (via dialog) without assigning IDs to each and every component: "datagrid1_changeHandler" or "button1_changeHandler" doesn't tell us what the function actually does. It's a basic coding best practice to name functions or methods after the actions they actually perform, and in a large application with complex forms auto-generated generic sounding function names are essentially useless from a maintainability standpoint.

For anyone interested, I figured it out:
to generate a CFC, you have to right-click a table in the RDS Dataview, then you can generate a CFC. You cannot generate a CFC from an AS class as described in the CF Builder help within Flash Builder.
Adobe: it would be nice if this got fixed – and if someone there replied to posts like this. You do know all this, don‘t you?

NI Motion Assistant LabVIEW Code Generation Error

Hello, the following is my current setup:
NI PCI-7334 motion control board
NI UMI 7774 splitter board
3 x NI P70530 Drives
3 x NI CTP12ELF10MAA00 Stepper Motors
3 x Power supply units for drives
LabVIEW 2010
NI Motion Assistant 2.6
Motion and Automation Explorer 4.7
I have built a three axis motion system that I am trying to configure with labview. After verifying that everything was set up correctly, I opened MAX, updated the firmware to my motion control board, and intitialized the controller. Since then, I have created many basic programs using the Motion Assistant Software to test the movement of my device. Everything works fine while using the Motion Assistant software (I have three axis movement, multidirectional control, and can perform various straight line and arc moves). My problems begin when I try to use the code generation feature.
When trying to use the code generation feature to output a labview diagram, I run into a problem where a dialog box pops up and says "Find the vi named ...."
Some examples of the names that come up are: Configure Vector Space.flx, Vector Space To Control.flx, Motion Error Handler.flx.
To be clear the program in Motion Assistant that I am trying to export to LabVIEW code is composed of two individual steps. One that tells X,Y, and Z motors to move forward 25 revolutions, and one step that tells them to move backwards 25 revolutions.
I have made many other programs in Motion Assistant that run fine, but I always receive similar errors when trying to use the code generation feature to export to LabVIEW. Is there something that I can do to solve my problem?
Thank you for your help.

Hi Joe,
I am using Ni-Motion Assistant 2.6, Ni-Motion 8.1, and Motion and Automated Explorer version 4.7.
The code I posted is supposed to tell Axis 1 to move 40 revolutions at 400 rpm. It works fine in Ni-Motion Assistant but when I try to generate a LabVIEW diagram I receive the following error, "Find the VI named 'Motion Error Handler.flx'". I have had it search my directory, as well as the disk that I installed both LabVIEW and Ni-Motion but no luck. Thanks for your help.
Attachments:
1111.vi ‏9 KB
1 axis movement.zip ‏8 KB

Code generation bug in Sun Studio 12

Hi,
The following program prints `Failure' when compiled with -xO4 where nothing should be printed (when compiled with no optimization or -xO2). It looks to me that the first comparison `buggy_routine' against 0x80 is returning True where it should return False.
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
typedef unsigned long long int      EIF_NATURAL_64;
typedef unsigned char   EIF_BOOLEAN;
typedef int EIF_INTEGER_32;
typedef char * EIF_REFERENCE;
char s[] = "9223372036854775808";
void buggy_routine (EIF_REFERENCE Current, EIF_NATURAL_64 arg1)
    EIF_NATURAL_64 tu8_1;
    tu8_1 = (EIF_NATURAL_64) ((EIF_INTEGER_32) 128L);
    if ((EIF_BOOLEAN) (arg1 <= tu8_1)) {
    } else {
        if ((EIF_BOOLEAN) (arg1 <= ((EIF_NATURAL_64) 9223372036854775808ull ))) {
        } else {
              printf("Failure\n");
int main (int argc, char ** argv, char **envp ) {
    EIF_NATURAL_64 loc2 = (EIF_NATURAL_64) 0;
    loc2 = (EIF_NATURAL_64) atoll(s);
    buggy_routine ("s", loc2);
}To reproduce:
cc -xO4 bug.c -o bug ; ./bug
It fails on both 32 and 64-bit code generation for x86. I haven't tried on Sparc as I need to install Sun Studio 12. Is this a known issue? Is there an easy workaround?
I tried with Sun Studio 11 and it worked just fine there.
Regards,
Manu
PS: I've tried with both version (the first is the one from the default installation) and the second after I noticed there were some patches available:
cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-01 2007/07/12
cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-02 2007/11/27

An issue filed at bugs.sun.com does not go directly into the bug database. It is evaluated, and if it turns out the report is actually a bug not previously reported, goes into the database. You get a notification and chance to reply after the report is evaluated.
In this case, I picked up your report myself, and filed the bug. The bug ID is 6654314, and will be visible at bugs.sun.com in a day or two.

NetBeans6 UML code generation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for