New bios m30x wrong size

Hello i have the m30x with ati radeon 128 mb
but the new bios 1.60win give the wrong size rom error when i wil install the bios.
is here a solution for or is the rom file the problem. the bios 1.30win is ok

i've tried updating it on my M30X with ATI as well but no luck. It comes up as wrong ROM size too. Maybe i should try the traditional method and see how it goes.

Similar Messages

  • Z87-GD65 Gaming: New BIOS?

    Hello,
    is there a new BIOS version available that can be used with the MSI Forum HQ USB flashing tool?
    The current Bios on my mainboard is 1.A or 1.10, the version of the Forum flash tool I have is 1.25g, and the latest version of the Intel ME Driver I have downloaded is 10.0.0.1204.
    Thanks

    Hi Svet,
    thanks a lot. It seems that the current MSI HQ Forum USB flasher is still "MSIHQ Tool 1.25g Installer.rar". I just want to be prepared with a new BIOS in case something goes wrong when I will finally change my intel onboard graphics into a nvidia discrete graphics card.
    But one more question: Since there is also the use of FPT recommended in some other thread in regards to all LGA 1150 mainboards, supposedly with the use of the BIOS version from the MSI support site, is there any difference to using the Forum flash tool method together with the BIOS version you gave me other than having to prepare the USB stick myself when I use of FPT instead of the convenience of letting the Forum flash tool do this for me?
    Thanks again.

  • Is there a new bios coming for P6N SLI Platinum for E8400 ?

         Hi everyone,
         ( My system specs are in the signature )
    I have been thinking to upgrade my cpu to E8400, but after some time passing through the forums, internet and asking some of my friends, I have decided not to. This is because I have seen many people frustrated and trying get their E8xxx's working on their moboard with endless efforts because of the wrong information given in the CPU support list of P6N-SLI Platinum. Yet, I have seen that only a few people have managed to get it work but with risky, manual adjustments.
    So here is my question, will there be a new bios for P6N SLI Platinum that will make E8xxx series post without any adjustments for the users that want to stick with their P6N SLI Plat.?

    Please ask here:
    http://ocss.msi.com.tw/

  • Create custom document with wrong size

    Hi,
    I have a problem (on Sun Solaris 5.8) when I create custom document with more than 10MB size.
    I've created an agent which detects the events on a custom data type
    MYDOCUMENT (extension .mydoc).
    When I put a new document test1.mydoc (size of 10MB for example), my agent detects the new document, creates a copy, sets the class object to
    MYDOCUMENT , removes the original document and puts the copy into the same folder.
    But sometimes, the copy created has a wrong size (less then 10MB).
    How can I configure the nfs server to be sure that the agent waits for the complete size of the added document.
    I need HELP !!!!
    Thanks

    Hi Pavithra,
                    yeah you can create your custom table by entering fields in Standard.  for more details
    refer below screen shots
    Regards,
      Thangam.P

  • Help: JPanel/JFrame display complexities, wrong size

    I am trying to make a simple game of worms.I wan't to draw a rectangle in the center of the window where in the middle the game is played and on the outside score, lives and other such things are displayed. The problem is the rectangle won't draw properly because the window is the wrong size and I don't know if it is something I am doing wrong with the panel or frame.
    import javax.swing.*;
    import java.awt.*;
    public class DemoWormPanel extends JPanel implements Runnable{
        private static final int WIDTH = 600, HEIGHT = 400;
        private Graphics dbG;
        private Image dbImage;
        private Thread animator;
        private boolean running = false;
        private Rectangle walls;
        public DemoWormPanel() {
            super();
            setSize(WIDTH,HEIGHT);
        public void startGame() {
            if (animator == null) {
                animator = new Thread(this);
                animator.start();
            running = true;
            //defining game walls at 50 pixels within panel border
            walls = new Rectangle(50, 50, WIDTH - 50, HEIGHT - 50);
        public void gameRender() {
            if (dbImage == null) {
                dbImage = createImage(WIDTH, HEIGHT);
                if (dbImage == null) {
                    System.out.println("Error creating double buffer");
                    System.exit(0);
                dbG = dbImage.getGraphics();
            dbG.setColor(Color.black);
            dbG.fillRect(0,0,WIDTH,HEIGHT);
            dbG.setColor(Color.white);
            dbG.drawRect(walls.x, walls.y, walls.width, walls.height);
        public void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
            super.paintComponent(g);
            g.drawImage(dbImage, 0, 0, this);
            g.dispose();
        public void update(Graphics g){
            paint(g);
        public void run() {
            while (running) {
                gameRender();
                repaint();
                try {
                    Thread.sleep(1000/50);
                } catch (InterruptedException e) {}
            System.exit(0);
        public static void main(String[] args) {
            DemoWormPanel wp = new DemoWormPanel();
            JFrame f = new JFrame();
            f.setTitle("Worms");
            f.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
            f.add(wp);
            f.setSize(WIDTH, HEIGHT);
            f.setVisible(true);
            wp.startGame();
    }Somewhere in there is my problem.
    What happens is that the right and bottom walls of the Rectangle are cut off of the screen because the window is not the right size. I changed the code to determine if the coordinates of the walls were accurate every iteration and they were. I also made it check the width and height every iteration by printing out this.getWidth() and this.getHeight() and found that instead of a 600 x 400 window, I have a 584 x 364. I also tried changing the panel and frame's size methods to make a new dimension instead of setting it directly from my constants and it had no effect. I also added directly to those constants to make it precisely 600 x 400 but the rectangle is still cut off, so maybe I also have a graphics issue. The only other potential issue I can think of is that I have Vista but I looked around here and searched google and found no similar issues to this.
    I am not new to java but I am also not advanced. I just started using java again after about 6 months and I have made a pong game before without this problem, on another computer though.I am at my wits end. I'll check for responses tomorrow and thank you for any help or insight you can offer.

    the problem is here
    walls = new Rectangle(50, 50, WIDTH - 50, HEIGHT - 50);
    at best the right/bottom walls will equal the frame's dimensions. try it as
    walls = new Rectangle(50, 50, WIDTH - 100, HEIGHT - 100);
    but this won't get you exactly what you want, due to the titlebar height (30?)
    slightly different version
    import javax.swing.*;
    import java.awt.*;
    class DemoWormPanel extends JPanel {
        private static final int WIDTH = 600, HEIGHT = 400;
        public DemoWormPanel() {
            setBackground(Color.BLACK);
            setPreferredSize(new Dimension(WIDTH-100,HEIGHT-100));
        public static void main(String[] args) {
            DemoWormPanel wp = new DemoWormPanel();
            JFrame f = new JFrame();
            f.setLayout(new GridBagLayout());
            f.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
            f.add(wp,new GridBagConstraints());
            f.setSize(WIDTH, HEIGHT);
            f.setVisible(true);
    }

  • Site previews fine in Firefox locally, but when I published the site all the text is the wrong size

    I am a rookie web designer. I recently created a site using CS6. http://www.joshuahetzler.com When I previewed the site in Dreamweaver it looked good in Firefox and IE. I published the site and now it is messed up in Firefox. All the text is the wrong size. Does anyone know how to fix this? Does it have something to do with my hosting provider? (I deleted a wordpress site from the directory an hourago and put this new site in its place) Why does IE display properly, but not Firefox...

    Caused by a bad link to your site's CSS file.  This is pointing to a file on your local hard drive which nobody but you can see.
    <link href="file:///C|/hetzlerj/jhgc/menu.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
    Open your template and reconcile the path to your site folder.  It should probably look like this:
    <link href="../menu.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
    Save Template.  Populate changes to Child pages.  Upload Child pages.
    Nancy O.

  • Landscape Orientation: [view bounds] gives wrong sizes?

    Hi
    Getting a view's bounds rect while in Landscape Mode returns the wrong sizes:
    Starting from a new UIView Template Project, I'm adding a single UIView to the ViewController in Interface Builder (in Landscape Mode) and setting the view size to width=400, height=200;
    However when I add a breakpoint in the ViewController (at viewDidAppear), the sizes are w=220, h=380!
    (Even though the view clearly is correct on the screen)
    In myViewController.m I've set:
    - (BOOL)shouldAutorotateToInterfaceOrientation:
    (UIInterfaceOrientation)interfaceOrientation {
    return (interfaceOrientation == UIInterfaceOrientationLandscapeRight); // home button on right
    In myAppDelegate.m
    - (BOOL)application:(UIApplication *)application didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:(NSDictionary *)launchOptions {
    application.statusBarOrientation = UIInterfaceOrientationLandscapeRight; //home on right
    [window addSubview:viewController.view];
    [window makeKeyAndVisible];
    return YES;
    and in the info.plist I've set: Initial interface orientation = Landscape (right home button)
    I'm not trying to rotate the view with the iPhone, it is meant to be fixed in Landscape only.
    Is there a workaround for this? I need to create some CALayers dependent on the correct view size.
    Thanks
    Steve

    I figured it out

  • Reading Blob with wrong size

    Hi,
    I stored a .jpg file in a BLOB using Oracle 9i.
    When i try to read it, i get the wrong size for the Blob.length() ...
    Please can someone help ...
    File file = new File(fileLoc);
    InputStream is = new FileInputStream(file);
    long length = file.length();
    OutputStream outstream = blob.setBinaryStream(length);
    byte[] buffer = new byte[(int)length];
    int readlength = -1;
    while ((readlength = is.read(buffer)) != -1)
             outstream.write(buffer, 0, readlength);
    is.close();
    outstream.flush();
    outstream.close();
    // TRY TO READ NOW
    // Here comes some JDBC stuff ...
    File newFile = new File("blob.jpg");
    FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(newFile);
    InputStream is2 = blob2.getBinaryStream();
    byte[] bb = new byte[(int)blob2.length()];
    int readlength2 = -1;
    while ((readlength2 = is2.read(bb)) != -1)
            fos.write(bb, 0, readlength2);
    is2.close();
    fos.flush();
    fos.close();

    I don't see anything wrong with it myself... assuming that your changes are being committed somewhere...
    Somewhere in the collection of examples at
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/sample_code/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/index.html
    is a good working example with a CLOB, which should be the just about the same. I think there was also a BLOB example, but I'm not sure...

  • What am I doing wrong - size issue

    Need some advice...as usual!
    I designed a site on my 17" monitor and set the margins to 0
    and table to 100%. However when I look at it on different screens
    it looks rubbish...big gap at the bottom of the page with the
    design cramp at the top. I wonder if someone would mind looking at
    my code and see what's wrong with it. The site was designed using
    various techniques including css for nav bars, tables, and
    fireworks elements. the site can be viewed at:
    www.shelleyhadler.co.uk/nerja.html
    thanks for your help. Shell

    >Re: What ams I doing wrong - size issue.
    Several things...
    First, your 17" monitor has noting to do with web page
    layout. What
    resolution is your monitor set to? it could be 800 pixels
    wide or 1280
    pixels... wouldn't that make a difference? That aside, screen
    resolution and
    size are irrelevant anyway. What counts it eh size that your
    viewers have
    their web browser window set at.
    I have a pretty large monitor, set to a very high resolution,
    so I open
    several windows at once and size them so I can see the
    content in all.
    Sometimes my browser is full screen and sometimes its shrunk
    down to less
    than 600 x 800. Your web site needs to accommodate that.
    Every web viewer
    out there is different and likes the way they have their
    screens set up. So
    you need to be flexible and your site needs to be flexible.
    Next, Don't design in Fireworks and import to Dreamweaver.
    Fireworks is a
    superb web ready graphics and imaging processing program. The
    authors
    (mistakenly) threw in some web authoring stuff that works
    very poorly.
    Design your pages using Dreamweaver. Learn html markup and
    css styling to
    arrange it, then use Fireworks to create graphics to support
    your content.
    Along the way, be aware of the diffferant browsers in use.
    Internet
    Explorer is the most popular (or at least most in use) simply
    by virtue of
    the Microsoft market share, but it is also the least web
    complient (by virue
    of the Microsoft arrogance) so some things that work there,
    (like your green
    bands) won't on other browsers and vice versa.
    That said... graphically, your site looks great. You have a
    good eye for
    composition and simple clean design. You just need to learn
    to use html to
    your best advantage to create some realy nice looking and
    nicely working
    sites.
    "shelleyfish" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Need some advice...as usual!
    >
    > I designed a site on my 17" monitor and set the margins
    to 0 and table to
    > 100%. However when I look at it on different screens it
    looks
    > rubbish...big
    > gap at the bottom of the page with the design cramp at
    the top. I wonder
    > if
    > someone would mind looking at my code and see what's
    wrong with it. The
    > site
    > was designed using various techniques including css for
    nav bars, tables,
    > and
    > fireworks elements. the site can be viewed at:
    >
    > www.shelleyhadler.co.uk/nerja.html
    >
    > thanks for your help. Shell
    >

  • Message reads 'wrong size paper'. it's not.

    HP officejet 6500A plus on a windows 7 computer.  prints fine using the copier function but when trying to print a page from the computer the paper jams and the message reads 'paper jam or wrong size paper'.  it's standard 8-1/2 x 11 white paper.  printing problem started about a week ago.  nothing new on the computer.  i've rebooted the printer and the computer with no improvement.

    more information.  i reinstalled the software.  no change.  i tried to print a test page.  didn't work.  i printed a diagnostic page and that DID work.  the information wasn't helpful but it did come off the computer which i haven't been able to do.

  • File displaying wrong size.

    The file displaying the wrong size is Fallout New Vegas on a wineskin wrapper. The wrapper was 500 Megabytes. When I installed fallout New Vegas on the wrapper, it remained at 500 Megabytes. I had installed it on the Desktop and now my About my Mac is doing the same thing. It only displays the 500 megabytes the file shows. I clicked more info and it still said that. How do I fix this to display it?
    BTW, when I copy it, it says 8.33 Gigabytes and  that is it's correct size.

    The Mac is reporting file size in megabytes.  Windows is reporting file size in mebibytes.  The difference is that a megabyte is 1,000,000 bytes, while a mebibyte is 1,048,576 bytes.  This change was made in Mac OS X so that reported disk sizes would agree with manufacturer's claimed sizes...  most manufacturers claiming a size of 500 GB mean 500,000,000,000 bytes.  Mac OS X will also call that number of bytes 500 GB, while Windows will call it 465.7 GB.  That confused a lot of people.
    For more information, see:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabyte#Consumer_confusion

  • Can I change the size of my iphoto book, when I am ready, but changed the wrong size

    Hallo,
    after several weeks work with my iphoto book, I discover, that I choosed the wrong size.
    I choosed  the size- "large book" instead of   XL book 33x31 cm .
    Can I change or have I do do the work twice.
    Many thanks
    itaenzer

    select the book in the source pane on the left and duplicate it (command-D) and then click on the themes button and select the new size/style/theme  --  closely inspect the book to be sure it is still correct (text may reflow due to size changes as may photo arrangement) - preview (
    Before ordering your book preview it using this method - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1040 - and save the resulting PDF for reference - the delivered book will match it. ) and order if it is what you want
    LN

  • New bios might help those with false temp readings...

    Well MSI just sent me a new bios to try to fix the false temp reading issue and at first I thought it was the already-released Bios 1.25 but after comparing the checksums of both it seems to be a different bios, being Bios 1.2A... Anyway, I stuck the files on a floppy and then booted from the floppy and flashed it and to no avail, the temps are still wrong... I have a Clawhammer core and was hoping to get some input from other people with Clawhammer and Newcastle cores... Here's the email conversation I had with them along with a link to the bios they sent me at the bottom...
    Quote
    Dear Alex,
    Please try attached BIOS to see if it helps and kindly let us know your test result.
    Thanks for your supporting MSI product.  Please feel free to let us know if you still have any further issues or inquires.
    Best regards,
    MSI Technical Support
    -----Original Message-----
    From: support_2 [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:17 PM
    To: 'Live4Ever'
    Subject: RE: False CPU Temperature Readings with K8N Neo Platinum
    Dear Alex,
    Thank you for contacting MSI Technical Support.
     The CPU temperature is different and there is tolerance difference between the data showed and the real temperature according to the CPU model and type and even produce date and manufactory . And this MB supports thermal protection function, it will prevent the MB and CPU from overheating. So please don't worry about the temperature.
    We have tested various CPU with newcastle core in our lab but we can't find the same problem. We'll keep checking with AMD and contact them to get more different CPU to analyse it futher together with them. New BIOS will released right now if we have some findings and figure out the sloution. Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
    Thanks for your supporting MSI product.  Please feel free to let us know if you still have any further issues or inquires.
    Best regards,
    MSI Technical Support
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Live4Ever [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:55 AM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: False CPU Temperature Readings with K8N Neo Platinum
    When will you guys be releasing a new bios for the K8N Neo Platinum that fixes the issues with false CPU temperature readings? As far as I know, none of the beta bioses that are out right now fix that particular issue. I have an AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer). My temperatures have ranged anywhere from 60C to 184C, it's obvious that these temperatures are wrong because the computer would should itself down somwhere around 75C. I am also sure the the CPU heatsink is seated correctly as I have reseated it many times. I took a look around on your forums and also noticed that I am not the only one having these problems as tons of people with Clawhammer and Newcastle cores are having the same problem. Is there an estimated release date for a fix on this?
    Thanks, Alex
    Bios 1.2A
    Whatever results you guys come up with, please post it in this thread so I can send it back to MSI and hopefully it will help them in fixing this problem...
    Oh and the usual disclaimer, don't try and sue me if you screw over your motherboard, I'm simply passing along the information they sent me...

    For anyone who is still having problems, please post the information written on the top of your CPU so I can send it back to MSI to help them fix this. If you can't get the info off the top of your CPU, take a screenshot of the CPU tab in CPU-Z and send it to my email at [email protected]. In my next email I will also let them know that there are some people with Newcastles that still have problems. Thanks.
    Quote
    Dear Alex,
    Thanks for your feedback.  could you please tell us all the information located on the top of the CPU? We'll check with AMD further to figure out the solution. We'll let you know if we have some findings and solution. Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
    Thanks for your supporting MSI product.  Please feel free to let us know if you still have any further issues or inquires.
    Best regards, MSI Technical Support
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Live4Ever [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 3:38 AM
    To: support_2
    Subject: Re: False CPU Temperature Readings with K8N Neo Platinum
    Well I had ten people with Newcastle cores test the bios and for all of them, the false temp readings were fixed. But those of us with Clawhammer's are still having problems... Any idea why the problems were fixed with Newcastle cores but not Clawhammer cores?
    Thanks, Alex
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: support_2
    To: [email protected]
    Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 5:43 PM
    Subject: RE: False CPU Temperature Readings with K8N Neo Platinum
    Dear Alex,
    Please try attached BIOS to see if it helps and kindly let us know your test result.
    Thanks for your supporting MSI product.  Please feel free to let us know if you still have any further issues or inquires.
    Best regards,
    MSI Technical Support
    -----Original Message-----
    From: support_2 [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:17 PM
    To: 'Live4Ever'
    Subject: RE: False CPU Temperature Readings with K8N Neo Platinum
    Dear Alex,
    Thank you for contacting MSI Technical Support.
     The CPU temperature is different and there is tolerance difference between the data showed and the real temperature according to the CPU model and type and even produce date and manufactory . And this MB supports thermal protection function, it will prevent the MB and CPU from overheating. So please don't worry about the temperature.
    We have tested various CPU with newcastle core in our lab but we can't find the same problem. We'll keep checking with AMD and contact them to get more different CPU to analyse it futher together with them. New BIOS will released right now if we have some findings and figure out the sloution. Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
    Thanks for your supporting MSI product.  Please feel free to let us know if you still have any further issues or inquires.
    Best regards,
    MSI Technical Support
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Live4Ever [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:55 AM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: False CPU Temperature Readings with K8N Neo Platinum
    When will you guys be releasing a new bios for the K8N Neo Platinum that fixes the issues with false CPU temperature readings? As far as I know, none of the beta bioses that are out right now fix that particular issue. I have an AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer). My temperatures have ranged anywhere from 60C to 184C, it's obvious that these temperatures are wrong because the computer would should itself down somwhere around 75C. I am also sure the the CPU heatsink is seated correctly as I have reseated it many times. I took a look around on your forums and also noticed that I am not the only one having these problems as tons of people with Clawhammer and Newcastle cores are having the same problem. Is there an estimated release date for a fix on this?
    Thanks, Alex

  • Northbridge temps and the new bios update

    I know the Northbridge temperature issue has been posted before. But I’m posting in relations to the new bios update supposed to be released 08/24. Will these temp issues be resolved in this new bios update?
    There could be many reasons why the Northbridge temps are so high, ranging from bad heatsink design to Northbridge fan blowing too fast. Mine runs 55C idle which is way too high…but when I go to touch the heatsink, it’s barely warm. A lot of people have been complaining about the “light show” on the Northbridge, but heck I like it. I think it’s pretty cool
    One last thing I’d like to bring up, this new bios update, I don’t know whether or not 1.6 supports DDR500mhz Ram (because I don’t have it yet) but will it support it? Reason being is I plan on buying DDR500mhz Ram and do some more overclocking.
    1:1 Cpu to Ram ratio here I COME!!! :D

    ROFLMAO  (first sign of insanity when you laugh about a such sad matter)
    Maesus, its nothing personal, but do you really believe there will be a v1.8 BIOS? To me it looks like MSI has abandoned the 875P. BIOS v1.7 is supposed to come when? ...August 28th? That's 2 months since the last one and as far as I have heard there has not much changed over v1.6. When is v1.8 supposed to come? Another 2 months later? Not to speak of v1.9... That makes about 5 months to get the board working the way it was supposed to do from the first day (if v1.7 solves something at all).
    Sorry, but MSI is about to lose all trustworthiness with this so called support. And moderators in a company's forum who are not even employees of that company, and have to take guesses (see Prescott support) about the products, do not help to make the situation much better (again, nothing personal). If the support team would take a look by themselves on a regularly basis (1-2 times a week) perhaps then the problems would be solved much faster. If I would work like this and not care about the customers I would have lost my job long ago.
    There are still many problems. The board is on the market for some months now and memory compatibility and timings are still an issue.
    I've visited many forums the last week. And I do hear (read) almost the same everywhere: Poeple who bought the 875P board say its high quality and has good features, if it only would work as supposed. MSI miserably fails to give it a working BIOS. Results in polls about "MSI 875P board good or bad" tend to be weighed horribly to "bad". Most of the ppl will never again buy a MSI board because they feel left alone with their problems.
    It is clear that ppl who are satisfied do not post that in forums. But when something is wrong, they do, because they want the problems solved. But what are support forums good for when no one is listening to the complaints?
    In times who prices are almost the same for the products, ppl tend to buy that product, that not only has the best features but also good support. When it comes to that MSI is not first choice.

  • P67A-GD65(B3), new BIOS 4.3 and power phases

    The old BIOS for P67A-GD65(B3) offered APS, Intel SVID and disabled as options for the power phases in the BIOS. The newest BIOS has no such option so I have to wonder whether APS and intel SVID are still around or all power phases options are set to disabled.
    I have 2 of those mainboards. In the first one the BIOS is upgraded to 4.3. The system has a Pentium G860 (Sandybridge) and a Corsair HX750 psu. Control Center reports system to have 1 phase active while idle but the phase system itself is reported as disabled. It is not reported as either Intel SVID or APS. This seems to be wrong though cause when system goes to full load all phases go active again.
    The other mainboard has an i5 2500K and was using BIOS v1.19. I had set the phase system to Intel SVID and indeed the phases changed between idle and full load. In a stupid attempt to benefit from Intel's rapid start technology that is supported on the latest BIOS and despite my better judgment I upgraded the BIOS to v 4.30. I had lots of issues with overclocking the CPU so I downgraded to 1.19 using the forum tool and the custom BIOS file. I may need to do a fresh installation of windows but according to the leds on the mainboard and the Control Center I can't get the mainboard to lower the phases even when idle. I've tried Intel SVID and APS in the BIOS but I had no luck. C1E is enabled along with every other energy saving feature. Currently and most of the time the i5 is running on stock clocks. I did notice that during the original upgrade from 1.19 to 4.30 in the BIOS the Intel ME was also upgraded from v7 to v8. I am not sure if the forum tool that reverted back the BIOS to v1.19 took care of the intel ME.
    So I wanted some clarification to what happens with the power phase system in the new BIOS (4.3) and a bit of help in regards to the other system that for the time being seems incapable of lowering CPU phases. The second system is using a Coolermaster Silent M 1000W psu. Both mainboards are equipped with 16GB of Corsair (XMS1600) memory. Both systems use aftermarket coolers that keep the temperature reasonably low while being very quiet. I could list the rest of the specs but I don't think they will matter much.

    The v4.3 was intended for those that decide to install an Ivy CPU. There must have been a reason why some of the features or settings were modified or eliminated to accomodate Ivy support. It may be best to ask this question directed towards the MSI Technical engineers.
      >> How To Contact MSI <<
    Quote
    So I wanted some clarification to what happens with the power phase system in the new BIOS (4.3) and a bit of help in regards to the other system that for the time being seems incapable of lowering CPU phases.
    As for phases, it may depend on how many applications are running in the background.

Maybe you are looking for