Nexus fport-channel-trunk problem

I have a Nexus 5548UP running 5.0(3)N2(1) and I want to enable the fport-channel-trunk command but I cannot enable this feature. When I issue a show feature I see it as a disabled feature but I cannot turn this on. I want to enable this so I can set up an F-Port Channel to a Fabric Interconnect 6120 (UCS).
I have enabled the following features
feature fcoe
system default switchport trunk mode off
feature telnet
cfs ipv4 distribute
cfs eth distribute
feature lacp
feature vpc
feature lldp
feature npv
feature npiv
I am also running the following licenses
MP-N5KUP-01(config)# sho license usage
Feature                      Ins Lic   Status Expiry Date Comments
                                 Count
FCOE_NPV_PKG                  No    -   Unused             -
FM_SERVER_PKG                 No    -   Unused             -
ENTERPRISE_PKG                Yes   -   Unused Never       -
FC_FEATURES_PKG               Yes   -   In use Never       -
LAN_BASE_SERVICES_PKG         No    -   Unused             -
LAN_ENTERPRISE_SERVICES_PKG   No    -   Unused             -
MP-N5KUP-01(config)#
Any help would be useful

Your N5k is configured to be in NPV mode and hence fport-channel-trunk is not a feature you can configure. However, the NP ports on the NPV switch can be bound into a channel/trunk to a NPIV/core switch which has
fport-channel-trunk configured.

Similar Messages

MDS Code Level for UCS FC Port Channel/Trunking

What is the required MDS code level needed to support FC Port-Channeling/Trunking on a 9222i, 9148, or 9509/9513 w/ Gen2 line cards to UCS 1.4(3)?
I know the fport-channel-trunk feature is needed and was released in MDS 4.2 code but I have seen documents that this level of code wont support these features when used to connect to Cisco UCS.
Can someone confirm? Is NXOS 5.0(4) or higher required?

Doug,
I wrote the doc almost a year ago and it doesn't have the latest interop matrix support information. The current MDS NX-OS support is located in this doc: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/mds9000/interoperability/matrix/intmatrx.html
While, I wish this was also duplicated in UCS docs, they are more or less taking the stance that 3rd party (Cisco MDS is this case) interop is maintained by the 3rd party. EMC, Netapp, or even Cisco.
It would be a nightmare updating UCS docs with 3rd party qualifications and support.
The short answer to your question is:
UCS 1.4(1), 1.4(2), 1.4(3) Is supported by MDS9000: 3.3(4a), 3.3(5), 4.2(1a), 4.2(1b), 4.2(3a), 4.2(5), 5.0(1a), 5.0(4), 5.0(4c)
NPV was introduced in MDS 3.3. f port-channel/trunk was introduced in MDS 4.2.
As Ram mentioned above, 4.2(5) is what I would recommend if I wanted to implement f port-channel and/or f port-trunk. I have also had recent experience with 4.2(5) and it worked great with a large UCS f port-channel/trunk implementation
The specific switch limitations I mentioned in my doc still exist. Only certain models of MDS will support f port-trunk. Almost all models will support f port-channel.
Dave

ASA 5505 Trunking problem with cisco 3760

Here is my asa 5505 configuration and at bottom i am pasting cisco 3760 configuration, I am having trunking problem and seen other people having the same issue but no solution.
Problem: when i connect any device on Switch 3760 port 1 which is trunked i cannot communicate with niether vlan.
I have tried device with both static vlan configuration
192.168.1.99 (vlan 2)
172.168.1.99 (vlan 8)
if i change port 1 to access mode or define native vlan it work with one vlan.
interface 5 of Cisco ASA is connected with interface 25 (uplink) on Cisco Switch
interface Ethernet0/5
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-10
switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
description **UPLINK**
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-10
switchport mode trunk
On port 1 of cisco Switch i am creating trunk
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
description **LAN**
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-10
switchport mode trunk
no logging event link-status
spanning-tree portfast
CISCO ASA Config i have configure the following vlans
interface Vlan2
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan8
description Server VLAN
nameif Internal_LAN
security-level 90
ip address 172.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
on Cisco 3760 i have configure the following vlan.
v
vlan 2
name inside
vlan 8
name Internal_LAN
interface Null0
no ip unreachables
Message was edited by: macboy

Hello,
I can see many people have visited the post but there isn't any reply.
I think this is because of the following:
The configurations are long and most people dont want to read it. Try adding only relevant configuration to the issue.
The problem description is not clear. You mention trunking problem but what exactly is the problem? Can you ping from switch to ASA? Is any Vlan information being passed or they are all failing. Try to be as much specific as possible.
Which port of the switch connects to the ASA?
Using portfast on a trunk (interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1) is not recommended.
Regards,
Felipe.
Remember to rate useful posts.

Output channel mapping problem for surround encoder

vista 64 bit
sound blaster titanium x-fi sound card
logitech 5.1 speaker set up
hello, i am trying to mix a movie i made into 5.1. when i open the surround encoder, go to the audio hardware setup and try to set my output channel mapping i only get two speakers. i have a card that supports 5.1, 5.1 speakers, and get surround sound when i play a DVD. yet audition only recognizes my left and right speaker. any help on how i get my output channel mapping set correctly?
thanks in advance!

Thank you for the info, though I admit I'm still a bit confused.
My card is a creative x-fi extreme gamer. It has 3 line out jacks and one line in jack. T Oh, here it is in the manual...thats just not good enough.
But what is the surround encoder dialog box doing, if not encoding surround mixes? The manual says I can exportsurround sound from a multitrack session.
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:58:08 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: output channel mapping problem for surround encoder

Router 2811 and C2960 Switch Trunking Problem

Hi all
I got an problem with a trunking problem between Router 2811 and C2960 switch
In router 2811 - I created f0/0.1 10.65.20.1 (VLAN 1) and f0/0.48 10.65.23.1 (VLAN 48)
In C2960 - Vlan 1 10.65.20.30 , VLAN 48 10.65.23.30
Finally I can only ping VLAN 1 IP but fail to ping VLAN 48 IP, can help me how to troubleshoot it?
Hugo
Router 2811 Configuration:
interface FastEthernet0/0.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
ip address 10.65.20.1 255.255.255.0
interface FastEthernet0/0.48
encapsulation dot1Q 48
ip address 10.65.23.1 255.255.255.0
C2960 Configuration:
interface FastEthernet0/24
switchport mode trunk

2811#sh vlans
Virtual LAN ID: 1 (IEEE 802.1Q Encapsulation)
vLAN Trunk Interface: FastEthernet0/0.1
This is configured as native Vlan for the following interface(s) :
FastEthernet0/0
Protocols Configured: Address: Received: Transmitted:
IP 10.65.20.1 388873 262275
Other 0 1723
390760 packets, 71854310 bytes input
263998 packets, 53723195 bytes output
Virtual LAN ID: 48 (IEEE 802.1Q Encapsulation)
vLAN Trunk Interface: FastEthernet0/0.48
Protocols Configured: Address: Received: Transmitted:
IP 10.65.23.1 0 0
Other 0 20
0 packets, 0 bytes input
20 packets, 1883 bytes output
2960_24#sh int trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Fa0/24 on 802.1q trunking 1
Gi0/1 on 802.1q trunking 1
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Fa0/24 1-4094
Gi0/1 1-4094
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Fa0/24 1,48
Gi0/1 1,48
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Fa0/24 1,48
Gi0/1 1,48

Nexus port channel load balance

Hi
I just want to clarify one setting for the port channel load balance on Nexus 6k switch. If I use the load balance option source-dest-ip-only, will following four converstions be load balanced?
10.10.10.1 -> 192.168.1.1
10.10.10.2 -> 192.168.1.1
10.10.10.1 -> 192.168.1.1
10.10.10.1 -> 192.168.1.2
Thanks. Leo

Hi Leo,
I think there may be typo in your question as I only see three conversations and not four. That aside I've not seen the Nexus port-channel load balancing sufficiently well documented to be able to give you the exact answer.
In their configuration guides Cisco only include the following statement:
Cisco NX-OS load balances traffic across all operational interfaces in a port channel by reducing part of the binary pattern formed from the addresses in the frame to a numerical value that selects one of the links in the channel.
There is other documentation that states the load balancing algorithm uses a CRC-8 based polynomial, but as we don't know exactly which parts of the frame are used in the calculation, I don't see it's possible to calculate the answer and so derive the link that will be used for a given conversation.
While I've not seen full documentation regarding the science used in the calculation, what Cisco have done is provide a command on the switch CLI that will allow you to determine which link of a port-channel will be used.
If you run the command show port-channel load-balance forwarding-path interface port-channel vlan src-ip dst-ip then one of the parts of the output is the member link of the port-channel that will be used for that flow.
You can find full details of the options for the show port-channel load-balance command in the command reference.
One other point to remember is that the load balancing across a port-channel is unidirectional, and the hashing might be completely different for the return flow of a conversation. For example it is entirely possible that traffic from A to B could use one link of a port-channel, while the return traffic from B to A for the same conversation could use a different link.
In general I would use the source-dest-port option for load balancing on the Nexus switches as this will obviously include the Layer-4 port numbers in the calculation, and so give you a better distribution of flows across all member links.
Regards

Fabric Interconnect To MDS 9148 FC Port Channel/Trunks

Is it possible to create both a Port Channel and Trunk on a Cisco MDS 9148? Yes correct?
Or can I only trunk between the 2 MDS switches and not the MDS to Fabric Interconnect?
These FC links would be connected to a 2248XP Fabric Interconnect carrying multiple VSANs from the MDS to the Fabric Interconnect.
Thanks

Hello,
Yes, you can have trunk links grouped into port channel ( F port-channel trunking ) between FI and MDS.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/gui/config/guide/2.0/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter_0101.html
Padma

FC Port Channel & Trunking

Hi, Cisco Experts:
Can I have a definitive answer to the following?
q1.
EMC mentioned that they do not support FC Port Channel & Trunking with regard to our UCS Fabric Interconnects/MDS/VNX5300?
Is that any truth in that?
We are trying a Cisco UCS solutions with MDS and EMC VNX in the mix-SAN Boot basically, ESXi 5.1 and all others.
q2.
From MDS all the ways up to EMC VNX, is there such concept too-FC Port Channel & Trunking, assuming we are doing FC Port Channel & Trunking from FInterconnect to MDS?
Please let me know.
Appreciate it.
SiM

Hi Sim,
We support FC port channel and trunking between UCS FI and MDS.
Is EMC saying about the port channel between the MDS and VNX? Is there any document EMC pointed out?
With respect to booting from SAN, yes, you can boot from SAN with MDS and EMC VNX as long as the OS is supported in the UCS system. You can refer to
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10477/prod_technical_reference_list.html for the supported OS versions.
Hope this answers your question.
-Ganesh

F-port-channel-trunk disruptive or not?

Hi,
We have a N5K with NPIV configured and and MDS9148 we're gonna setup a port channel and have come to the conclusion that we need the F-port-channel-trunk feature enabled on the MDS side.
Question: Is enabling the F-port-channel-trunk feature on the MDS disruptive or non-disruptive?
--M

It's too late; I would say it is disruptive; however, the disruption is so short, that you didn't notice it. Similar without non F-port trunking channeling: using a link: the lost sessions are simply redistributed over the remaining links; new flogi is necessary.

Port-channel L2 problem with Fabric Interconnect and Nexus 7010

Hi,
i using port-channel from both fabric interconnect to N7k with 3 cables per Fabric Interconnect.
but, my problem is when i creating port-channel, Fabric Interconnect don't support mode ON dan rate-mode share in Interface 10G Nexus 7010.
I was trying :
1. I using non dedicated port in Nexus 7010.
      - rate-mode share
      - channel-group 1 mode active
      - switchport mode trunk
when i using this option, the port-channel in Nexus 7010 was suspended
2. I using non dedicated port in Nexus 7010
     - rate-mode share
     - channel group 1 mode on
     - switchport mode trunk
when i using this option, the port-channel in Nexus 7010 was came up, but in Fabric interconnect was failed.
3. I using dedicated port in Nexus 7010
     - rate-mode share
     - channel group 1 mode active
     - switchport mode trunk
when i using this option, the port-channel in Nexus 7010 was suspended
4. I using dedicated port in Nexus 7010
     - rate-mode dedicated
     - channel group 1 mode active
     - switchport mode trunk
when i using this option, the port-channel in Nexus 7010 was came up and running well.
but, the problem is my costumer do not want using a dedicated rate-mode. if i using dedicated mode the only available port is 8 interfaces instead of 32 ports. i want to using rate-mode share in nexus 7010.
is there any way to configuring port-channel using mode on in fabric interconnect ? i was trying using CLI to create port-channel in Fabric interconect but i cannot configure the channel group protocol.
i attach the topology of N7K with Fabric interconnect.
regards,
Berwin H

Hi Manish,
the issue was solved, i was fix it last week.
the solution is:
i enable the license grace-priode (since my license is Enterprise so cannot create VDC) then i create a VDC (ex: VDC 2) so i allocate the interface on all module
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
N7K-M132XP-12 to VDC 2. after that i delete VDC 2 then all interface back to VDC 1 (default vdc). then i enable the rate-mode share in dedicated port and bundle into port-channel and its working.
i dont know why it must move to VDC first then it will working, maybe cisco can explain the reasons.
So here the result of my port-channel :
SVRN7KFARM-HO-01# show port-channel summary
Flags: D - Down        P - Up in port-channel (members)
        I - Individual H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
        s - Suspended   r - Module-removed
        S - Switched    R - Routed
        U - Up (port-channel)
Group Port-       Type     Protocol Member Ports
      Channel
1     Po1(SU)     Eth      LACP      Eth1/1(P)    Eth1/2(P)    Eth1/3(P)
                                     Eth1/4(P)    Eth1/25(P)
2     Po2(SU)     Eth      LACP      Eth1/9(P)    Eth1/10(P)   Eth1/11(P)
                                     Eth1/12(P)   Eth1/26(P)
3     Po3(SU)     Eth      LACP      Eth1/17(P)   Eth1/18(P)
4     Po4(SU)     Eth      NONE      Eth10/32(P) Eth10/34(P) Eth10/35(P)
                                     Eth10/36(P)
Thanks.
Berwin H

K9N PLATINUM(NON SLI) DUAL CHANNEL MODE PROBLEM

hi
put a new system together with the following specs:
amd am2 3800+(2ghz)
k9n platinum 1.20 bios
2x512 kingston ddr2(667mhz)
pci video(yes not pci-e)have not decided which vid card to get yet.
500w psu 12v 35a,5v 25a,3.3v 25a
liteon dvd burner
seagate 300gb ide 7200/16 meg cache windows xp-pro sp2 with all updates.
not overclocking or even trying to.
no sata drives connected.
has never failed to post,boot windows and no lockups or blue screens.
ok,i am trying to get the memory to work in dual mode.
everytime i put the memory in the dual mode slots,the cpu clocks down to 1ghz instead of 2ghz.
verified by bios,windows and cpu-id
i have tried different memory(both ddr2 533 and 667)667 installed now.
also never had any install problems with windows and everything runs fine until i tried dual mode.
after the cpu clocks down to 1ghz,the only way to get it back to normal is a bios reset( load defaults
or press red button).
if i leave the memory as single channel then i have no issues.
also cpu-id says the chipset for my board is nforce 550,i thought k9n platinum had 570 nforce chipset?
this might just be a problem with cpu-id though.
any thoughts on the cpu down clock problem in dual channel mode?
thanks,jeff

1 assume you can get into BIOS with 1 stick only?
Go into the BIOS and manually set the timings and voltage to what your memory manufacturer recommends. Use a 2T command rate and see if it works.
Try both "sets" of dual channel slots, i.e. the two left slots or the two right slots.

Dual Channel memory problems on Neo 875P

I am having considerable trouble getting the NEO 875P to work with dual channel DDR400 DIMMs. I have two Kingston KVR400X64C25 DDR400 256MB memory modules, each of which works correctly by itself. However, once I move one
of the modules to channel B, I cannot boot my operating system (currently Windows XP.) The problem also occurs in Windows 2000, which I also have on the system. I receive blue screen errors that indicate paging/memory problems. I have upgraded my BIOS to the latest version (1.3)* in the hope that it would solve my problems, but it has not. The POST screen detects that there is 512MB of memory working in Dual Channel mode, but even when it does get through the O/S booting process (rarely), it crashes within minutes. Putting just one of the chips in makes the system perfectly stable. If anyone has any information, please let me know!
Thanks,
Jim Keller
http://www.centerfuse.net
* My board was dead after trying to flash the 1.3 BIOS, but after about 10 attempts of using CTRL+HOME method to recover the BIOS, it finally worked with version 1.0. I then re-flashed with 1.3, and it rebooted fine. Are there any updates about all of the problems with v1.3 ?

>I can only answer based on what I've read on this forum
I figured as much, I was just wondering if you knew whether MSI themselves frequents the forums or answers emails sufficiently.
I've had an interesting development though. I stumbled upon Tom's Hardware Guide's article about 875P motherboards at http://www17.tomshardware.com/motherboard/20030519/i875p-01.html
They mentioned that they needed to increase the memory voltage from 2.5 to 2.6 in the BIOS to get some memory modules to work. I did this, and for the first time, I am running in Dual channel DDR mode. However, the article also mentions that "the system does not run completely stably", so I guess I'll have to wait and see if it crashes again. However, I'm far enough beyond the XP splash screen to post this message, so I guess we're getting somewhere!
-Jim Keller
http://www.centerfuse.net

VMS Client Channel Buffering Problem

I just received my new Verizon VMS system which includes 2 client units. I hooked everything up and all was working as it should except that when watching live TV on the two client units, it will not buffer two different TV channels and allow me to switch back and forth between these two channels and rewind, fast forward or pause. It will only buffer one channel and when I switch to another, the original channels buffer is gone. I could do this on all three of my standard HD DVR boxes before swithcing to the VMS and this was a huge feature for me as I like to watch multiple shows or sporting events simultaneaously. I called support and after about 90 minutes they could find no problem or find any solution other then to send me a new VMS. The odd thing is when they looked at all of the tuners being used, tuners 3 annd 4 were never getting used. The odder thing is that it seemed to work properly on one of the client boxes until they did a cold init and then that one also stopped allowing 2 channels to be buffered.
Should I be able to buffer two seperate channels on the client boxes as well as the main VMS box or did they for some awful reasone take this feature away from the clients??
Thanks,
Eric

DOES VMS DO THESE THINGS FOR YOU ?
VZ VMS1100 Video Media Server
From Pg of 2 of Manual
The VMS1100 provides the following advanced functionality:
• Whole home DVR support for up to four connected IP Client set-top boxes
• Authorization and purchase of on-demand programming
• High-Definition television (HDTV) video decoding
• HDTV output through component video (YPbPr) or High-Definition Multimedia Interface™ (HDMI™)
• Surround-sound audio through a variety of analog and digital interconnection options
Live playback and LOD buffering capabilities to pause and time shift live video and seamlessly record for
all connected televisions
• Built-in MoCA 1.1/2.0 HW support
As with all ARRIS digital set-tops, the hardware features are enabled by core operating and third-party
application software.
Tom
Freedom Essentials, QIP 7100 1,Bose SOLO TV Sound System,,QIP 7216 P2,M1424WR Rev F, iPad 2 WiFi,iPhone 5,TV SYST INFO Release 1.9.5 Build No. 17.45
Data Object 39.45

Regarding Receiver Communication Channel (Concurrency problem)

Hi Masters ,
In Receiver Communication Channel which is connected to oracle data base ..while updating records Status from N to C . i am getting following errors :
**Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Channel has reached maximum concurrency (5,000 concurrent messages) and no free resource found within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the maximum concurrency level**
Actually we are updating 10000 records status from N to C....... earlier it was updating in 30min now its hanging and giving above error ...... after 3 hrs its automatically displays updated succesfully message .
Can you help me to understand wht exactly happening and at wht level i have to do settings in communication channel so tht it should work properly..
Thanks in Advance.............
Jagannath.

Hi Jagannath
you can specify the maximum concurrency for receiver adapters. This defines the number of messages an adapter can process in parallel on a cluster node.
Enter the number of messages to be processed in parallel by the receiver channel. For example, if you enter the value 2, then two messages are processed in parallel. Default value is 1 and this means only one message can be processed at a time by the receiver channel.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/64/ce4e886334ec4ea7c2712e11cc567c/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/bc/bb79d6061007419a081e58cbeaaf28/frameset.htm
increase this parameter from 1000 to a higher value you required and you would not be facing such problem
Regards
sandeep
If helpful kindly reward points

Route pattern to SIP trunk problem

Hello, I have a 2801 router that has been configured with CME and a working SIP connection to my local ISP.
Tested with calls via CME so I know for sure that the SIP config and dial plan is fine on this gateway.
Next I wanted to try out CUCM so I set up a CUCM 8.6 box that is connected to the 2801 router to use as it's SIP gateway.
The only change I made to the gateway router config was to alter the "ip option 150" address so that the phones go to CUCM for their configs etc (which they do with no problems).
Then I set up a SIP trunk in CUCM along with a route pattern which is to use the SIP trunk within the Gateway/Route list option.
But when I make a call that matches this route pattern all I get is the intermittent beep message from the phone. I cannot route calls succesfully through it.
I have checked network connectivity and all is fine. The IP address I specfied in CUCM for the SIP trunk is simply one of the interfaces on the 2801 router and it is definitley reachable.
I also activated "debug ccsip all" on the 2801 gateway router but nothing appears. So it seems like the calls are not even reaching the 2801 gateway ?
Is the problem possibly a conflit between CME on the gateway router and my CUCM ?
Do I need to disable CME somehow on the gateway first ? Or am I not doing something correct in the CUCM config ?
Thank you kindly for any suggestions.
ps. I have attached a couple of screenshots of my config.

Hello, thanks for helping.
I activated "debug voice ccapi inout" as well as "debug ccsip all" on the gateway but nothing showed up.
Therefore I deduce the call is not even making it to across the SIP trunk into the gateway router ?
As I am a newbie trying this out for the first time, it is guranteed to be something really simple.
I have included my running config from the gateway router below..
One addition I made was to add an incoming dial peer. That is "dial peer 5, description CUCM SIP trunk".
I set it up with a destination patter 2... to match my phone config on CUCM which have numbering in the 2000 range.
Sorry, I got RTMT up and running but could not get any meaningful results from it. I need to learn up on that.
I did however run a 'dialed number analysis' from CUCM direct and have attached the result. It seems the dialled number "99" is matching the route pattern OK.
So why is it not then moving down the SIP trunk to my gateway and getting picked up by the incoming dial peer ?
Thanks if you guys can offer any more help.
version 15.1
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname Router
boot-start-marker
boot system flash:c2801-ipvoicek9-mz.151-2.T0a.bin
boot-end-marker
no aaa new-model
clock timezone nzst 13 0
dot11 syslog
ip source-route
ip dhcp pool DATA_SCOPE
   network 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 192.168.200.1
   dns-server 8.8.8.8
ip dhcp pool VOICE_SCOPE
   network 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 192.168.100.1
   option 150 ip 192.168.2.115
ip dhcp pool MGMT_SCOPE
   network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 192.168.1.99
ip cef
ip name-server 4.2.2.2
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
voice class codec 1
codec preference 1 g711alaw
codec preference 2 g729r8
codec preference 3 g711ulaw
codec preference 4 ilbc
voice translation-rule 1
rule 1 /^9/ //
voice translation-profile Strip9ToGetOut
translate called 1
voice-card 0
crypto pki token default removal timeout 0
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-2995340181
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-2995340181
revocation-check none
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-2995340181
certificate self-signed 01
3082023E 308201A7 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030
31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274
69666963 6174652D 32393935 33343031 3831301E 170D3733 30363034 31393534
32305A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649
4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D32 39393533
34303138 3130819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281
8100C34D C8ECBB53 E01373A3 2E286B78 2D23042B 1C8588B1 A7861899 BA1C6860
AE1D7868 2A59E3BC 54D0A457 8FFDE27F C09104E5 C7A429F3 74CD9DA8 4A980366
675CC27C CDB94838 821CC05F 2C0AC2BC D882C132 6CAA1FA6 6DA740E4 562428B1
12B741F1 A50C9246 4CC35EDA DEE1D038 3883BB35 A91ABF8B 483E4160 F5FA4B5A
9A570203 010001A3 66306430 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 30110603
551D1104 0A300882 06526F75 74657230 1F060355 1D230418 30168014 72119640
F3396E1F E4168086 D31D8619 0D8337FF 301D0603 551D0E04 16041472 119640F3
396E1FE4 168086D3 1D86190D 8337FF30 0D06092A 864886F7 0D010104 05000381
81003B5A 29DE3A1E C5AB6092 E8D90650 C80752FC 0AAC93FD C5DE3D69 071B08FA
D4013232 81CA07E7 15F90190 6A3AD6A0 1D05F0F2 13479568 888332A5 F81E2681
7DA44095 4D11CFB7 CA79579A 8D95DE54 7B00173C E2C50573 A310C8C9 1487FEFC
CE35B66E 9EF94CFA 8D6D6DCD ADC78132 2709F198 6DF2F0FA D80CC088 D0C4C7D1 080B
      quit
license udi pid CISCO2801 sn FTX0947W07M
username xxx privilege 15 password 0 xxx
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.3.50 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/1
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/1.2
encapsulation dot1Q 2
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
interface FastEthernet0/1.99
encapsulation dot1Q 99
ip address 192.168.1.99 255.255.255.0
interface FastEthernet0/1.100
description voice_VLAN
encapsulation dot1Q 100
ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0
interface FastEthernet0/1.200
description data_VLAN
encapsulation dot1Q 200
ip address 192.168.200.1 255.255.255.0
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.1
logging esm config
tftp-server flash:/phone/7940-7960/P00307020200.bin alias P00307020200.bin
tftp-server flash:/phone/7940-7960/P00307020200.loads alias P00307020200.loads
tftp-server flash:/phone/7940-7960/P00307020200.sb2 alias P00307020200.sb2
tftp-server flash:/phone/7940-7960/P00307020200.sbn alias P00307020200.sbn
control-plane
mgcp fax t38 ecm
dial-peer voice 1 voip
description local_7_Digit_Calling
translation-profile outgoing Strip9ToGetOut
destination-pattern 9[2-9]......
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:203.184.16.2
voice-class codec 1
dial-peer voice 2 voip
description international_calling
translation-profile outgoing Strip9ToGetOut
destination-pattern 900T
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:203.184.16.2
voice-class codec 1
dial-peer voice 3 voip
description national_calling
translation-profile outgoing Strip9ToGetOut
destination-pattern 90[34679].......
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:203.184.16.2
voice-class codec 1
dial-peer voice 4 voip
translation-profile outgoing Strip9ToGetOut
destination-pattern 90[34679].......
dial-peer voice 5 voip
description CUCM SIP trunk
destination-pattern 2...
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:192.168.2.115
voice-class codec 1
sip-ua
authentication username xxxxxxxxxx password xxxxxxxx
060
telephony-service
max-ephones 10
max-dn 20
ip source-address 192.168.1.99 port 2000
load 7960-7940 P00307020200
max-conferences 4 gain -6
transfer-system full-consult
create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00
ephone-dn 1 dual-line
number 1000
name Lydia Francis
ephone-dn 2 dual-line
number 1001
name Leah Francis
ephone-dn 3 dual-line
number 1002
n
ephone-dn 4 dual-line
number 1003
ephone 1
mac-address C80A.A970.01DE
type CIPC
button 2:2
ephone 2
mac-address 000C.3070.8705
button 1:1 2:15
ephone 3
mac-address 000C.8546.5954
button 1:3 2:15
line con 0
logging synchronous
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
privilege level 15
login local
transport input telnet ssh
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
ntp server 195.43.74.123
end

Nexus fport-channel-trunk problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for