No budget credit with goods issue

1- At the time of  Purchase order , system should watch the budget ( Working fine )
2- at the time of goods issuance, system should watach the budget of expenditure line item ( working Fine), but stock line item posting should be statiscal. When we post goods issue, system credit the budget of stock line item which we do not want.
Please guide
Thanks

Hi,
You should create a derivation rule in your FMDERIVE strategy, defining that in cases of relevant material transaction and credit operation (all these fields are available as source fields), the FM objects derived are dummy(statistical).
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

  • FM MM integration - Budget Duplicated during goods issue

    Hi,
    Budget is getting duplicated during goods issue
    Following is the process fallowed:
    Process steps
    T.code
    FM A/c Assignment Update
    Remarks
    Purchase requisition
    ME51N
    Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
    Budget Consumed
    Purchase requisition Release
    ME54N
    Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
    Purchase Order
    ME21N
    Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
    Budget Consumed – PR Reference
    Purchase Order Release
    ME29N
    Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
    Goods Receipt
    MIGO
    Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
    Budget Consumed – PO reference
    Material Reservation
    MB21
    Created with reference to WBS Element
    Goods Issue
    MIGO
    Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
    Budget Duplicated during goods issue (Note: No Purchasing document reference is updated in line item)
    Invoice Receipt
    MIRO
    Payment
    F-53/F-58
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ravindra Kutnikar

    Hi,
    This is a standard SAP behavior. You may assign any DUMMY commitment item in FM derive for Consumption G/L. Create a derivation rule based on G/L and wherever you dont want budget control, put dummy commitment item. Goods receipt and issue are two different flow. As you said, fod goods issue, there is no reference of corresponding goods receipt. Thats the reason why this happens.
    Regards,
    Sudeep.

  • Critical field credit block goods issue level

    Hi,
    In our company we do Automatic credit management at at goods issue level.
    At the moment over a certain credit limit the GI just gets blocked.
    Now we have requirement where if the payment terms are changed by enduser at the sales order level then the GI should be blocked.
    I tried the "critical field" option and it is working at the sales order level by blocking it but not on goods issue level.
    I have assigned the credit group"03-goods issue" to the delivery type OVAD.
    In OVA8 i have maintained automatic credit control with critical field selected and Reaction "c" and status block selected for the combination of credit control areacredit groupsrisk cat (000)
    In FD32 i have maintained risk category for the customer (000).
    Could some one help please?
    Thank you

    Hi vinod
    In OVA8 if you are using the dynamic credit check then make the status option  C. secondly uncheck the open items and also change the time period if it is in days and if you have given 7days then change according to the billing days say as the change in the payment terms if the billing take place after 1week then add another 7days and make it to 14days
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Issue with Goods Issue.....

    Hi gurus,
    I am working on an interface where I need to do goods Issue and for this I have written the following code, but my return statement is returning this error" Goods movement not possible with mvmt type 201"
    data: begin of it_input_file occurs 0,
    matnr(18),
    werks(4),
    uoe_qty(13),
    amount(13),
    st_loc(4),
    batch(10),
    account(10),
    uoe_uom(3),
    end of it_input_file.
    v_semfile = p_ifname.
    refresh it_input_file.
    call function 'WS_UPLOAD'
    EXPORTING
    filename = v_semfile
    filetype = 'DAT'
    TABLES
    data_tab = it_input_file
    EXCEPTIONS
    conversion_error = 1
    file_open_error = 2
    file_read_error = 3
    invalid_type = 4
    no_batch = 5
    unknown_error = 6
    invalid_table_width = 7
    gui_refuse_filetransfer = 8
    customer_error = 9
    others = 10.
    if sy-subrc <> 0.
    message id sy-msgid type sy-msgty number sy-msgno
    with sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
    move: syst-datum to v_doc_date,
    syst-datum to v_pos_date.
    loop at it_input_file.
    move: v_doc_date to GOODSMVT_HEADER-DOC_DATE,
    v_pos_date to GOODSMVT_HEADER-pstng_date,
    syst-uname to GOODSMVT_HEADER-pr_uname.
    move: '05' to GOODSMVT_CODE-GM_CODE.
    move: it_input_file-matnr to GOODSMVT_ITEM-material,
    it_input_file-werks to GOODSMVT_ITEM-plant,
    it_input_file-st_loc to GOODSMVT_ITEM-stge_loc,
    it_input_file-batch to GOODSMVT_ITEM-batch,
    it_input_file-uoe_qty to GOODSMVT_ITEM-entry_qnt,
    it_input_file-uoe_uom to GOODSMVT_ITEM-entry_uom,
    it_input_file-amount to GOODSMVT_ITEM-AMOUNT_LC,
    ' ' to GOODSMVT_ITEM-MVT_IND,
    'X' to GOODSMVT_ITEM-NO_MORE_GR,
    move: '201' to GOODSMVT_ITEM-move_type,
    append goodsmvt_item.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
    EXPORTING
    GOODSMVT_HEADER = GOODSMVT_HEADER
    GOODSMVT_CODE = GOODSMVT_CODE
    IMPORTING
    GOODSMVT_HEADRET = GOODSMVT_HEADRET
    MATERIALDOCUMENT = MATERIALDOCUMENT
    MATDOCUMENTYEAR = MATDOCUMENTYEAR
    TABLES
    GOODSMVT_ITEM = GOODSMVT_ITEM
    RETURN = RETURN
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
    IMPORTING
    RETURN = return2.
    Message was edited by:
    Rajeev Gupta
    Message was edited by:
    Rajeev Gupta
    Message was edited by:
            Rajeev  Gupta

    what is the value that you are passing in move:
    c_mov_type2 to GOODSMVT_ITEM-move_type?
    In SAP IMG.
    Please check whether this movement type is assigned to Settings for Goods Movements (MIGO).
    Materials Management ->Inventory Management and Physical Inventory->
    Settings for Transactions and Reference Documents.
    Please check with your functional team.

  • Reconcillation with goods issue using 351 and goods receipt using 101

    my clients create sto to a supplying plant and goods issue is done from the supplying plant against the sto using mvt 351 to the receiving plant and the receiving plant does migo using 101 to receive the material.The issue is that they want to be able to reconcile in the sense that to actually know the 101 that has been done against the 351.

    As we know the 351 and 101 both movement types are happened against purchase order,
    And when 351 and 101 movement type happens against the Purchase order, the all information are stored in table EKBE. You can look up in EKBE table to compare movement type 351 and 101 movement type for the purchase order number.
    Regards
    Dev

  • Problems with Goods Issue to Production in Warehouse

    Hi
    It has been configured in the storage type search for the warehouse  for the storage type indicators that for the movement types 261 and 262, the movement type reference should control the storage type search.
    It has been seen that the movement type reference is ignored during the storage type search when isssuing goods to production or reversing the issue.
    for example if we see all the open TR in transaction LL01 for the movement type 261 & if we try to create transfer order with respect to that TR , the stor loc search returned will be w/o mvt type ref.
    Can some body throw some light on this
    Regards
    RAJ K

    Hi,
    Please check settings in following places
    1.SPRO-activities -Transfers -Movement type
    2.SPRO-Interfaces-Movement type-
    3.Check Storage type search with storage type indicator
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Billing date(fkdat) in sales order item is not copied from Goods Issue Date

    Hi All
    we are facing problem at item level billing date field.This field should be filled with the GI Date in schedule lines shipping tab.
    but, it(billing date) is not being filled with goods issue date but, with the required deliver date at sales order header.
    Please give me a solution and the root cause. This is urgent as business is halted.
    Thanks
    Kumar

    Lakshmipati
    This is from SAP Screen
    "If invoice dates are defined for the customer, the system proposes the billing date from the invoice date calendar. If no invoice dates are agreed, then the actual goods issue date is formed on the basis of delivery related billing. In order related billing, the billing date of the order forms the basis of the billing date."
    earlier it is happening as desired.i.e., billing date=GI Date.
    but, as of now it is taken from the required delivery date.
    Please give me solution
    Kumar

  • FIFO price when Goods Issue is wrong

    Hi
    I  have 2 warehouses: 02 and 03 and by mistake I did a Goods Issue from warehouse 02 instead of 03.
    I am using FIFO.
    How can I correct this wrong goods issue so that my FIFO prices are correct?
    Thank you
    Irina
    Edited by: Darius Heydarian on Apr 14, 2008 4:07 PM

    I’m afraid; there is no good solution to reproduce the exact FIFO structure. If you need the original structure, you should remove all the higher layers with goods issue and rebuild it with appropriate goods receipt transactions...
    May be someone has a better idea?

  • Cancellation of Goods Receipt with Credit Memo Transaction Issue

    Dear SAP Expert and Guru,
    Normally cancellation of goods receipt cannot be done when invoice has been issued. Cancellation of Goods receipt can only be done when there is the credit memo being issued in MIRO.
    The problem now is that is there any table that can tracked the linkage between Credit Memo and the Cancellation of Goods receipt?
    The goods receipt with the invoice linkage can be found in both table EKBE and BKPF. But not the credit memo and cancellation of Goods receipt.
    Thank you
    Regards
    Leonard Tan

    Dear Jeya and SAP expert and Gurus,
    You are correct, but with the document number, how am I going to get the Cancellation of GR document?
    In table BKPF and EKBE. With the invoice number (34*******) then pass it to table BKPF to get the invoice number (52*******),
    Then get the invoice number (52*******) pass it to table EKBE to get the Goods Receipt document (61*******).
    However, this only can track the transaction goods receipt and Invoice but not the credit memo with cancellation of goods receipt.
    Kindly asvise on that.
    Thank you
    Regards
    Leonard Tan
    Note : Do not quote previous reply every time,simply reply for member you want to respond.
    Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Jul 8, 2011 3:23 PM

  • How does Goods Issue know which Batches to deallocate from A/R Credit Memo?

    Hi,
    I am creating an addon that runs after a A/R Credit Memo is created.  It creates a Goods Issue, and enters the Item Code and the Quantity from the line items on the Credit Memo into the Goods Issue.
    After it writes the Goods Issue to SAP, I open up the document it created and see that the line items are in there correctly, and that somehow the batches assigned to those line items are also in there.
    There is nothing in the code that does anything with the Batches, but somehow SAP knows which batches to work with.
    I haven't been able to find any info about it.  Can you please help us understand what is happening?  How does SAP know and make assignments to batches in line items in Goods Issues?
    Thank you,
    Mike

    Hi Michael and Gordon,
    Sorry Gordon, I'm quite sure you misunderstood Michael original question. Michael asked how the add-on he created could link corresponding batch number from an A/R Credit Memo document could be selected by Goods Issue document which generated by the add-on, while he actually never wrote a code to select any batches numbers which available in the system.
    Maybe a little bit of illustration:
    1. Item A, qty 10 - (batch A qty 5, batch B qty 3, batch C qty 2)
    2. A/R Credit Memo occurred, return of Item A with 3 qty (batch A qty 1, batch B qty 1, batch D qty 1). Therefore, item A latest position should be (batch A qty 6, batch B qty 4, batch C qty 2, batch D qty 1). This A/R Credit Memo created by add-on.
    3. Goods Issue document triggered by add-on. The problem is, Michael never write any code to select any batch numbers, and somehow the system choose batch number precisely as occurred in number 2 (A/R Credit Memo document), which is (batch A qty 1, batch B qty 1, batch D qty 1). Therefore the stock position for Item A back to as being displayed in number 1.
    I believe this shouldn't be possible at all. Unless, there is a certain mechanism in SAP that automatically choose batch number to used in Goods Issue document using LIFO (Last In First Out), which is, as far as I know never exist in any SAP B1 version. Yes you could automatically choose batch numbers according to available batch, but you could do this when system prompt you when you tried to issue certain document using SAP application itself, not using add-on.
    And of course, you could write a code to choose certain batches based on certain A/R Credit Memo, but still, you need to write a code, you can't do this without a code, selection of batches is compulsory when you tried to add a goods issue document which consist of items that managed using batches.
    In my opinion, I think it is better for you to re-write those codes and relate batches you want to attach with your Goods Issue document based on corresponding A/R Credit Memo. It is much safer, and the error message you encountered won't happen again in the future.
    Best Regards,
    Hendry Wijaya

  • Credit check at goods issue and release authorziation based on value

    Hi,
    I am doing credit management config. My reqmt. is to have credit check at goods issue only. Done this through credit group in automatic credit management config. I have used static check with both open orders and open deliveries checked.
    open sales order (delivery not created) value is not updating in the credit exposure field in FD32 can u tell me what can be the problem (I have maintained the subtotal value A in pricing procedure)
    My 2nd requirement is based on the range of credit value, documents should be released. i.e., Credit limit is 1Lakh. Now when it exceeds by 50000, credit manager is authorized to release in VKM5. If it exceeds & between 50000 - 1Lakh, Finance Head should be authorized to release in VKM5 and finally it exceeds above 1Lakh , VP Finance should be authorized to release. How do we handle this, pls. give me solution for the above scenario
    Thanks
    Dhina

    HI
    > I am doing credit management config. My reqmt. is to have credit check at goods issue only. Done this through credit group in automatic credit management config. I have used static check with both open orders and open deliveries checked.
    > open sales order (delivery not created) value is not updating in the credit exposure field in FD32 can u tell me what can be the problem (I have maintained the subtotal value A in pricing procedure)
    Please Check the OSS Note 18613 that gives the check list for credit management setings
    > My 2nd requirement is based on the range of credit value, documents should be released. i.e., Credit limit is 1Lakh. Now when it exceeds by 50000, credit manager is authorized to release in VKM5. If it exceeds & between 50000 - 1Lakh, Finance Head should be authorized to release in VKM5 and finally it exceeds above 1Lakh , VP Finance should be authorized to release. How do we handle this, pls. give me solution for the above scenario
    Please discuss with your ABAP and Basis Consultant.
    Regards,
    Phani Prasad

  • Budget availibilty control against Goods Issue

    Hi all,
    can anybody help me in the following issue....
    in a budgeted/released cost project (WBS elements only):
    i set up a budget profile (overall & annual years, and availability control against annual values), and assigned it to the project
    i configured the availability control in order to issue a warning message when exceeding 110% from the budget against all activities (target group: ++)
    Availability Control is active
    However,
    When i made a Goods Issue for a particular WBS element has the status "REL / BUDG / AVAC"   with amount more than110% of the WBS element budget, the system permit the transaction and does NOT issue the warning message.... WHY??
    Also, when i run CJI3 report, i find the amount of the Goods Issue in the actual cost of the WBS element,
    NOTE: the availability control is working well against Purchase Orders, and FI direct postings FB60

    Search the forum before posting such basic queries. You will find your answer.

  • Credit block in delivery document (not in posting goods issue)

    Good afternoon!
    When I try to deliver an sales order with exceeded credit limit, the following occurs:
    I enter in tcode VL01N, input the order and press enter, then the system issues a warning "Credit user check 1 unsuccessful" because some condition in the user exit LVKMPFZ1 was not satisfied. The problem is that at this point, no document has been sent to VKM1, and neither when I save the delivery.
    It is only sent when I enter in the same delivery again and save it one more time, which is a undesireable behavior. Important: the post goods issue doesn´t work at all (which is correct).
    Is there any way of sending the delivery document to the VKM1 when I save delivery document in the first time?
    Best Regards,
    Adriano Cardoso

    Good afternoon!
    When I try to deliver an sales order with exceeded credit limit, the following occurs:
    I enter in tcode VL01N, input the order and press enter, then the system issues a warning "Credit user check 1 unsuccessful" because some condition in the user exit LVKMPFZ1 was not satisfied. The problem is that at this point, no document has been sent to VKM1, and neither when I save the delivery.
    It is only sent when I enter in the same delivery again and save it one more time, which is a undesireable behavior. Important: the post goods issue doesn´t work at all (which is correct).
    Is there any way of sending the delivery document to the VKM1 when I save delivery document in the first time?
    Best Regards,
    Adriano Cardoso

  • Budget check at the time of goods issue

    Friendds,
    can we do budget check ( with Funds Mgt ), at the time of goods issue ( mb21), if yes, pl share withme.
    regards

    Hi,
    MB21 is MM reservation. This kind of transaction has no impact on FM tables, but you can achieve this by activating a business function (see note 1321375).
    Regards,
    Eli

  • CS service order budget can't control goods issue from stock?

    Hi experts,
    I set budget to a service order(CS), it can control Purchase order from service order, however it can't control the good issue from stock(type "L") !  Is it the setting problem? how to deal with it?
    best regards
    lance

    1st
    If you actually bothered to read my post, you would see that I decided to change for the X220 after I saw it in the flesh and realised how much close it was to the X121s dimensions. If lenovo wishes this not to happen very often, they should bother do something about the fact that there is no Lenovo dealership/agent/representative in Oxford.
    2nd.
    If Lenovo lists paypal as payment method, they should honour it. Otherwise, do not list it at all.
    3rd.
    If lenovo says that I can cancel the day I ordered with no implication, they should also honour this. Not ignore my e-mails (contrary to the terms & conditions stated) and ship it so I can perhaps keep it. That's not good business practice. That's playing dumb.
    They had 5 days to cancel, they prefered to wait for the item to be produced/stocked so that they can ship it to a small hamlet in Oxfordshire (half the way around the globe) so I can send it back. So yeah, this little laptop will circumvent the Earth.
    If this is not wasteful, then what is?
    As far as I am concerned, it took me 10 telephone calls and to DR just to get the cancellation e-mail which should be sent immediately.
    If you do not value your time, it is your problem, not mine.
    I will not be buying a Mac either as I do not like the product, but the difference in service couldn't be more stark.
    All the best,
    Sav.

Maybe you are looking for