Budget availibilty control against Goods Issue

Hi all,
can anybody help me in the following issue....
in a budgeted/released cost project (WBS elements only):
i set up a budget profile (overall & annual years, and availability control against annual values), and assigned it to the project
i configured the availability control in order to issue a warning message when exceeding 110% from the budget against all activities (target group: ++)
Availability Control is active
However,
When i made a Goods Issue for a particular WBS element has the status "REL / BUDG / AVAC" with amount more than110% of the WBS element budget, the system permit the transaction and does NOT issue the warning message.... WHY??
Also, when i run CJI3 report, i find the amount of the Goods Issue in the actual cost of the WBS element,
NOTE: the availability control is working well against Purchase Orders, and FI direct postings FB60

Search the forum before posting such basic queries. You will find your answer.

Similar Messages

Control the goods issue(migo) on the basis of reservation number

Dear All,
I want to restrict the goods issue against the manual reservations.
Logic:At the time of goods issue against the reservation system should check stock in hand(unrestricted stock)-all previous reservations.
Eg:suppose unrestricted stock is 50kg
Reservation 1 for 20 kg
Reservation 2 for 30 kg
Reservation 3 for 40 kg
Reservation 4 for 10 kg
When i do goods issue for Res :3
System should check Uns Stock(50kg)-Previous Res(20kg+30kg)
give error message stock insufficient.
Waiting for the expert comment.
Kind Regards,
Sankar T

hi,
check these exits n badi's related to migo transaction.
if u want to restrict by giving conditions u can do it using the exits n badi's.
Transaction Code - MIGO                     Goods movement
Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
MB_CF001                                Customer Function Exit in the Case of Updating a Mat. Doc.
MBCF0011                                Read from RESB and RKPF for print list in MB26
MBCF0010                                Customer exit: Create reservation BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1
MBCF0009                                Filling the storage location field
MBCF0007                                Customer function exit: Updating a reservation
MBCF0006                                Customer function for WBS element
MBCF0005                                Material document item for goods receipt/issue slip
MBCF0002                                Customer function exit: Segment text in material doc. item
Business Add-in
ARC_MM_MATBEL_WRITE                     Archive AddOn-Specific Data for MM_MATBEL
ARC_MM_MATBEL_CHECK                     Check AddOn-Specific Criteria for MM_MATBEL
MB_CHECK_LINE_BADI                      BAdI: Check Line Before Copying to the Blocking Tables
MB_PHYSINV_INTERNAL                     Connection: Core Inventory and Retail AddOn
MB_RESERVATION_BADI                     MB21/MB22: Check and Complete Dialog Data
MB_QUAN_CHECK_BADI                      BAdI: Item Data at Time of Quantity Check
MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI                       BAdI in MIGO for Changing Item Data
MB_MIGO_BADI                            BAdI in MIGO for External Detail Subscreens
MB_DOC_BADI_INTERNAL                    BAdIs when Creating a Material Document (SAP Internal)
MB_DOCUMENT_UPDATE                      BADI when updating material document: MSEG and MKPF
MB_DOCUMENT_BADI                        BAdIs when Creating a Material Document
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7_QTY                     Proposal of quantity from Excise invoice in GR
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7                         BAdI for India Version exit in include MM07MFB7
MB_CIN_LMBMBU04                         posting of gr
MB_BATCH_MASTER                         Setting of Batch Data at Goods Movement
reward points if hlpful.

Controlling the goods issue for various terms of sale

Can anyone tell me how in ECC 6.0 that I can have an intransit status on goods leaving the factory and going to the port (FOB) or to the customer (CIF) and can relieve the inventory when the confirmation is received? I have seen in the IS-OIL sector this functionality exists in the Transportation and Distribution - but this is not part of ECC 6.0 (standard). Can I activate this functionality in ECC 6 or is there some other means to make this happen in ECC 6 that I am missing?

I've made a researh yesterday and realized that at the item table of the billing document (VBRP) there exists field for the batch number of the item. This can be the reason. Delivery is the reference document and must be consistent with the billing document. That means, the batch numbers for the items at the delivef there exists no batch number at the delivery document, there should exist no batch number at the billing document, too. This is the reason, I believe. But maybe there may be a way out for goods issue after creating a billing document when the delivery is formerly created.

CS service order budget can't control goods issue from stock?

Hi experts,
I set budget to a service order(CS), it can control Purchase order from service order, however it can't control the good issue from stock(type "L") ! Is it the setting problem? how to deal with it?
best regards
lance

1st
If you actually bothered to read my post, you would see that I decided to change for the X220 after I saw it in the flesh and realised how much close it was to the X121s dimensions. If lenovo wishes this not to happen very often, they should bother do something about the fact that there is no Lenovo dealership/agent/representative in Oxford.
2nd.
If Lenovo lists paypal as payment method, they should honour it. Otherwise, do not list it at all.
3rd.
If lenovo says that I can cancel the day I ordered with no implication, they should also honour this. Not ignore my e-mails (contrary to the terms & conditions stated) and ship it so I can perhaps keep it. That's not good business practice. That's playing dumb.
They had 5 days to cancel, they prefered to wait for the item to be produced/stocked so that they can ship it to a small hamlet in Oxfordshire (half the way around the globe) so I can send it back. So yeah, this little laptop will circumvent the Earth.
If this is not wasteful, then what is?
As far as I am concerned, it took me 10 telephone calls and to DR just to get the cancellation e-mail which should be sent immediately.
If you do not value your time, it is your problem, not mine.
I will not be buying a Mac either as I do not like the product, but the difference in service couldn't be more stark.
All the best,
Sav.

Reversal of excess goods issue

Hi Friends,
There is a requirement.
I have created a process order for material A with 10KG and component required is B 1000GM with no data about location or batch.
I do a goods issue of 900 GM. Now if i want to reverse issue, I use MB1A -> Cancel with reference --> To order... It will populate the data in Material, Quantity, UnE but Sloc and Batch does not populates..
Requirement:
When I do a reverse issue using MB1A -> Cancel with reference --> To order, system should populate all the fields Material, Quantity, UnE , Sloc and Batch.
Note: We do not have backflush concept and also in the process order component level user does not enters the batch and storage location and he does not want to enter.
Regards,
Narendra Bora

Narendera,
As explained by me, when you are doing goods Issue reversal against order or reservation system so the relevant values of the items are copied from the reservation or order. We are NOT doing reversal against goods Issue for the system to copy that values of the previously posted goods Issue. For this purpose only SAP has provided material document cancelation functionality using MBST.
My suggestion would be to simply do goods Issue material document cancellation and then re-issue again or manually enter the required details. If this still does not suite you, then look for some user exit, check with your abap person on this.
Regards,
Prasobh

Good issue and returns in invoice verification.

Hello.
We work with scheduling agreements for procurement. The field "goods-receipt-based invoice verification" is marked in all items as we want to verify each good receipt in invoice verification. Returns are posted against good issue (using MBRL).
In this scenario we want to verify separately good issue items and return items in invoice verification.
By example:
Good issue: 100 st
Return: 20 st (mbrl indicating the good issue)
In MIRO (invoice verification) the system shows one item of 80 st. We want that the system shows one debit item of 100 st and one credit item of 20 st.
Is this possible?
Thanks.

To achieve this requiremnt please post the MIRO with reference to Delivery note in place of PO.

IW41-Restrict confirmation without goods issue

Dear Expert,
How to restrict confirmation for tcode IW41 if manual goods issue (MB1A) is not done against maintenance order.There are so many threads against goods issue check for confirmation against production order but not for maintenance order.Please let me know if we can do this my any user exit or user status.If possible please share the steps or logic for the same.
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
Swapnil

Hello swapnil,
The following code in include ZXCOFU05 (user-exit CONFPM05), would suffice the requirement you have stated in your question.
IF CAUFVD_TAB-AUART = 'ZM03'.
   DATA: IT_GM TYPE TABLE OF AUFM.
   SELECT * FROM AUFM INTO TABLE IT_GM WHERE AUFNR = CAUFVD_TAB-AUFNR.
   IF IT_GM[] IS INITIAL.
     MESSAGE: 'Goods Movement not found for this Order !' TYPE 'E' DISPLAY LIKE 'I'.
   ENDIF.
ENDIF.
This code while saving confirmation (IW41, IW44), gives rise to the error popup below, if no Goods movement is done against an Order   of type 'ZM03'.
Few points to be noted while using user-exits
1. User-exits will function when they are assigned to a project created through CMOD.
2. The code should always specify the limits like the 1st line here which confines the application of the code to only ZM03 type orders. Like wise you can limit this code to a particular Tcode (IW41) or list of Tcodes IW41, IW44. (by using syntax like IF SY-TCODE = 'IW41' OR SY-TCODE = 'IW44'.)
3. You should test well in Dev100 and Dev220 and quality clients before taking it to Prodn server.
4. You can further refine your code, incorporating more IFs as per your situation (Take help of your ABAPer).
4. In my view user-exits are very convenient and more flexible way of defining our checks to the standard programs.
KJogeswaraRao

Can not "post goods issue" against Vendor Return PO.

Hello Friends,
**I have a problem During the "Vendor Return Through Purchase Order" Process.I crated a PO with return flag set.**
**Then 1) Created a outbound delivery against purchase order (VL10B)**
2) Created a Billing (VF01)**
3) Next is VL02N - While doing the "post goods issue" where i got following error message "Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 161 X X _ L)"**
Its shows setting related to Mvt 161 to update .I check allowed transaction with respect to 161....VL02N is there .....But don't understand what change needed in "Update control /WM movement type is needed.....Pls suggest any solution........Thanx**
Regards
Sachin
*Error Messafe -
Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 161 X X _ L)
Message no. M7226
Diagnosis
The system could not find entry 161 X X _ L in any of the movement type control tables.
Procedure
Cancel current processing.
Contact your system administrator.
Action to be taken by the system administrator
Check in Customizing for Inventory Management under Copy, Change Movement Types whether the entry is contained in the Update control view for the movement type.
If the entry is missing, proceed as follows:
For standard movement types, this means that the given process is not supported using the present data combination. Do not create any entries without prior arrangement with your SAP consultant. Otherwise, incorrect postings may result.
For customer-defined movement types (beginning with 9, X, Y, or Z), this may mean that they have not been fully defined. Delete the movement type and re-create it by copying a standard movement type.

Hi Antony,
Thanx for reply.
1) I had assign delivery Type (RL -Returns Purchase order) to my document type. Assingnment of delivery type thru
spro>MM->purchasing>purchase order->set up stock transport order--->assign delivery type and checking rule....
2) MvT - 161----If i modify 161 wrt to GR Returns what modification is needed ? ......
3) VOV6 - I had checked it ,maintain it, but that is not relavant in my case....
4) During PGI system pick 161 as defalult MvT.....can we change it t0 122 ? but how...??
still the problem is there......
Sachin

Budget error is not coming at the time of goods issue

Dear all,
I am using warehouse funds center concept. While creating Purchase requisition and Purchase order i am getting budget exceeded error. but while goods issue i am not getting any budget exceeded error even budget is not available for the respected fund center and commitment item.
Please let me know how to get the budget exceeded error at the time of goods issue.
Thanks in advance.
ANJI REDDY

It seems as per your business requirement the budgets are checked up to inventory level only.
That is to elobarate,
Suppose you have a fund center X for which the budget is let's say 100,000/- LC.
The system is configured to check the procurements VIA PR>PO>MIGO-->MIRO only.
As you have checked budgets at above stages it is not necessary to check at Goods issue to consumption as this will create unnecessary process spokes.
check for the Inventory GL account and consumptions for any "Dummy" or "Not Budget related commitments are assigned" or in teh derivation strategies.
If the business needs you to check the budgets, you need to have the Fund centers for consumption of funds and as well as budget amounts for the same combinations.
The cycle of Procure to Receive ends at MIGO and the Material what you got is against Inventory which is a balance sheet Items which usually not related to budgets.
When you want to check budgets on consumption, as far as my opinion is concerned at the PO time it self use Account assignemnt "K". But I feel it is only suggested when you don't have a requirement of Inventory keeping.

Regarding goods issue (reversal) against process order

Dear friends,
Recently i have noticed one strange thing in SAP.I have created one process order and against it i have done the confirmation.Now when i go to Transaction code mb1a and select movement type 262 (Goods Issue to process order-reversal) and give the storage location and in next screen i gave order number,material code and its qty.These material code is not maintained in the bom of order header material.And even in process order in material tab we haven't maintained this material.Also while doing the confirmation in goods movement we haven't maintained this material.Then also system allows me to do so.Which means material which i haven't issued against the process order, system is allowing me to do its reversal i.e (262).because of which system is creating the stock for that material, which is not correct.
Can we control this behaviour of system.
Thanking you guys in advance.

Hi Jitendra,
This is fact and there is no standard Control available for the same.Only thing you can do is put control over Movement type 262 or try it by implementing User Exit.
I am not sure but you can use Enhancement CCOWB001 - Customer exit for modifying menu entries.
Include is LXCOWBF01.
Regards,
Dhaval

Goods return against maintenance work order exceeds goods issue

Is there a way to prevent returning more quantity (262 movement type done within MB1A) than was issued (261 movement type done within MIGO_GI) against a maintenance work order component?
Thanks in advance,
Rick

Hi,
Movement Types 261 and 262 works in Planned as well as in Unplanned both ways.
If you do Goods Issue w.r.t. Maintenance/Work Order (Movement Type - 261) then components and their quantity get defaulted from the reservation created automatically during order creation and system does not allow us to issue more that the quantity in reservation.
Similarly when you cancel the Goods Issue Document then it hits Movement Type 262 automatically and does not allow to edit the quantity.
The above two processes are planned ways.
Now when you want to do extra consumption of components against Maintenance/Work Order then you do not do Goods Issue > Order, instead of this you do Goods Issue > Others and then specify all the necessary details manually (Like; material, quantity, etc...) and enter Maintenance/Work Order as an Account Assignment on which the cost is getting loaded.
Similarly when you are receiving materials from Maintenance/Work Order using option Goods Receipt > Others then here also there is no control and you can receive any quantity from Maintenance/Work Order since here also Maintenance/Work Order is working as an account assignment not a control document.
The above two processes are unplanned ways.
So in short, there is not any control on this movement when it is unplanned.

Goods Issue activity creation for Funds Management Actuals Budgeting

Hi All,
We have implemented the commitment budget (PR/PO/GRIR) process at our workplace, and now we need to budget the actual consumption too (Goods Issue)
While trying to assign a strategy, I find that in the Activity Group, there is no Goods Issue activity group, but there are groups like Purchase Orders, Purchase Requisitions, Actual Posting, Controlling Posting etc defined for group numbers like 20,30,40,60, etc.
Do we need to create one, before we start budgeting the actuals too through the Goods Issuing process ? In that case, for the derivation strategy for this Goods Issue process, what value type and CO business transaction needs to be given to map it ? The value types too are categorised like invoices, payments, funds block, funds reservation, etc and the CO business transactions are FICA, RMBA, RMWA, etc, but there is not Goods Issue Transaction type.
Regards,
Wy

Hi Eli,
Thanks for the inputs !!
I suppose you meant Goods Issue comes under Value Type "54", which is named Invoices.
I checked out for possible derivations in the AVC Activity Groups and found a CO Business Transaction RMWL - Possibly felt that there must be a derivation with this and value type 54 to get the correspoding activity 40 "Actual Posting" - I got a bit confused seeing a separate Goods Issue transaction type and thus felt that there might be a separate activity group too.
Regards,
Wy

Availability Control @ Material Requisition and Goods Issue

HI,
We have a business requirement , Availability Check at
1. Material Requisition
2. Goods Issue
Can Some one suggest config Path or user exit / BADI etc to achieve the same.
Note : we are using Former Budgeting and update profile 101
Regards,
Klreddy
Moderator: Please, follow standard procedure for AVC setting and search SDN before posting

Thanks Alex,
Shall we know the settings for availability Control @ Goods Issue .
Regards,
klreddy

FM MM integration - Budget Duplicated during goods issue

Hi,
Budget is getting duplicated during goods issue
Following is the process fallowed:
Process steps
T.code
FM A/c Assignment Update
Remarks
Purchase requisition
ME51N
Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
Budget Consumed
Purchase requisition Release
ME54N
Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
Purchase Order
ME21N
Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
Budget Consumed – PR Reference
Purchase Order Release
ME29N
Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
Goods Receipt
MIGO
Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
Budget Consumed – PO reference
Material Reservation
MB21
Created with reference to WBS Element
Goods Issue
MIGO
Commitment item/Fund/Fund Center
Budget Duplicated during goods issue (Note: No Purchasing document reference is updated in line item)
Invoice Receipt
MIRO
Payment
F-53/F-58
Thanks and Regards,
Ravindra Kutnikar

Hi,
This is a standard SAP behavior. You may assign any DUMMY commitment item in FM derive for Consumption G/L. Create a derivation rule based on G/L and wherever you dont want budget control, put dummy commitment item. Goods receipt and issue are two different flow. As you said, fod goods issue, there is no reference of corresponding goods receipt. Thats the reason why this happens.
Regards,
Sudeep.

Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

Hello gurus,
We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
I will explain the business requirement.
- We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
- This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
- Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed. For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this. This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit". This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
- During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue. We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
Thanks in advance

Hi RJ,
First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
AS - IS
               Business process
          From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
e.g.
Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40 Unit
Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty to (60+40) =100 or
2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
Pros & Cons
if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
Solution ::
so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
Hope this help

Budget availibilty control against Goods Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for