"NO CENVAT AMOUNT TO BE POSTED NO CENVAT AMOUNT TO BE REVERSED" while doing
I am facing a issue u201CNO CENVAT AMOUNT TO BE POSTED NO CENVAT AMOUNT TO BE REVERSEDu201D while doing the J1IEX transaction for the GRPO IP.
I have captured the excise invoice in MIGO and trying to post in J1IEX. Also checked the Part 1 tables (J_1IPART1 and J_1IEXCDTL) are generated and updated with Internal No.
Can you let me know what could be the reason for giving the above message
Will be appreciated for the help
Hi,
Go through the note 910681. You are expected to give subtransaction type IP to excise transactions GRPO, EWPO,CAPE & DIEX. IP represents imports & the system will not post any accounting if this is not present
SPRO - LG - tax on goods mvmt - Accounting - Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction ...If the subtransaction
type is not defined for this then the one given in the customising node Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction will NOT be recognised.
Regards,
Brinda
Similar Messages
-
NO CENVAT AMOUNT TO BE POSTED/NO CENVAT AMOUNT TO BE REVERSED
Dear Gurus,
I am getting an errre message NO CENVAT AMOUNT TO BE POSTED/NO CENVAT AMOUNT TO BE REVERSED in J1IEX while simulating .Plz suggest the solutiol its urjent.
Regards,
Kirtihai kirti,
Even i am facing the same problem and I have checked in j1id(about vendor,material,excise number and all other) but even the problem exist, how did you solve this issue.Reply will be appreciated.
Thanks
Edited by: surmik on Jan 18, 2011 5:02 AM -
Error : No Cenvat amount to be posted ... urgent
Dear Experts,
I have captured the excise invoice during GR and part 1 entries have been updated.
However, while posting excise invoice when I simulate cenvat in j1iex for import purchase orders I get an error 'No cenvat amount to be posted and no cenvat amount to be reversed'
This is bit urgent....
Cheers!
Sachin NarvekarHi,
I also got the same problem. we maintained subtransaction type as IP Import purchase in SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods movement - india- account determination - maintain subtransaction type.
then we maintain SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods movement - india- account determination - specify excise accounts per transaction. In this maintain maintain values for IP for main transaction of EWPO, GRPO, CAPE.
Then maintain SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods movement - india- account determination - specify G/L account per excise transaction. Take help of FICO person in this.
By this way I solve the problem.
Regards
Sai Krishna
09810497206 -
J1IEX - No Cenvat amount to be posted
I have captured the excise invoice during GR and part 1 entries have been updated. However, while posting excise invoice when I simulate cenvat in j1iex for import purchase orders I get an error No cenvat amount to be posted and no cenvat amount to be reversed. (This is for Import Purchasing & for Tools - Capital goods - GPRO - IP)
Edited by: Pavan CN on Nov 8, 2008 8:42 AMHey Buddy try these settings
GRPO IP CR CLEAR
GRPO IP DR MSUSP
GRPO IP DR ONHOLD
GRPO IP DR PLAAED
GRPO IP DR PLAAT1
GRPO IP DR PLABED
GRPO IP DR PLACESS
GRPO IP DR PLAECS
GRPO IP DR RG23AED
GRPO IP DR RG23AT1
GRPO IP DR RG23BED
GRPO IP DR RG23ECS
GRPO IP DR RG23SED
EWPO IP CR CLEAR
EWPO IP DR PLAECS
EWPO IP DR RG23AED
EWPO IP DR RG23AT1
EWPO IP DR RG23BED
EWPO IP DR RG23ECS
EWPO IP DR RG23SED
This helped me .. may be this will help u as well -
Posting of cenvat credit of 50% on capital goods through T.Code:J1IH
Hi
Please advise me the procedure for posting of cenvat credit of 50% on capital goods through T.Code:J1IH.
As a matter of fact, when i tried to post the last year credit of 50% cenvat credit on capital goods the system accepting 50% only.
For example, last year we got Rs.200000 as cenvat credit and out of that 50% credit of Rs.100000 got availed last year. In this year when i tried to avail of remaining of Rs.100000 through transaction code J1IH system is accepting 50% of Rs.100000 i.e only Rs.50000 is accepting.
I look forward for your reply
Thanks and Best Regards
Shekhar
Edited by: Shekhar Yecham on Sep 16, 2008 8:54 PMHello,
The settings before 01.04.2010 were same. However, after thorough checking of the GL A/cs, I have following observations -
1) Plant 1 - Balance as on 31.03.2010 in Cenvat on Hold A/c -Rs. 195080. It is upload balance & t.code used is FBVB
There are some more transctions in this A/c which are reversed due to wrong entries.
Balance in Excise Duty RG 23 C as on 31.03.2010 - NIL
2) Plant 2 - Balance in Cenvat on Hold A/c as on 31.03.2010 is Rs. 166701. Again this is an upload balance with FBVB
Balance in Excise Duty RG 23 C as on 31.03.2010 - Rs. 56931.62
3) Plant 3 - No upload balance. All the transactions are routed through J1IEX except 1 from FB01
Balance as on 31.03.2010 - Cenvat On Hold A/c - Rs. 86876.06
ED RG 23C - NIL
Hence, would like to know -
1) Any separate procedure to take the credit of upload entries?
2) If the Balance in ED RG 23C A/c is NIL, will it affect on taking credit?
Thanks & Regards,
Reshma -
Wrong posting for CENVAT clrng A/C in MIRO
Dear All
Concerned to Indian Excise.
Scenario:1)Tax code contains BED16%,Ecs3% & CST 3%
2)In J1ID maintained 16%(Exc Rate) & 3%(Ecs Rate) for that chapter id
Eg:
Base= 46500
ED= 7440
ECS= 223
When i do GR i have captured the excise duty less than what tax code proposed.That is ED 4440.54 & ECS 103.00,same is posted in J1IEX.
Now during MIRO CENVAT clearing A/C is not debiting for the same values what got posted in J1IEX.
eg:CENVAT bedit postings in MIRO are:
CENVAT clrng a/c 4440.54+ for BED
CENVAT clrng a/c 133.22+ for ECS
Pls advise how to make it happen.during MIRO I want CENVAT account should get dibit for the same value what has been posted in J1IEX.
Reward points are sure.
RegdsHi,
Check the Tax procedure in and if it is taxinj check whether for BED altcty should be 354 and for ECS 364 both are there are not? pl check
thanks
prasad -
Can a credit memo be posted with zero amount?
Can a credit memo be posted with zero amount? What would it mean, that the goods qty have been posted free of cost?
Pls reply...
Thanks,
Swati.yes, It depends upon the procurement...
I have raised a PO for 100 pieces, But the Vendor will supply only in Dozens..
That means for 100 pices , we will receive 9 Dozens( 108 pieces)..
Similarly some times if it's a Fragile material , the Vendor will send more pieces as a buffer..
If IR Qty > GR Qty , it becomes Qty variance..
Similarly I received 100 Qty & 5 pieces are Sub-Standard, then I will raise Credit memo for that...
Edited by: Manohar Raju on Apr 30, 2008 4:58 PM -
F-30 Posting the difference amount a Customer account
Hi Experts,
I am a Technincal Person looking for answer on transaction F-30 (Post with clearing for incoming payments).
I have a requirement in BDC where I need to post the Difference amount to a Dummy/Default Customer.
I have to post the items based on Document Numbers(BELNR).
Kindly share your knowledge on how this is done.
Regards,
MaheshHi Experts,
I am a Technical Person looking for answer on transaction F-30 (Post with clearing for incoming payments).
I have a requirement in BDC where I need to post the Difference amount to a Dummy/Default Customer.
I have to post the items based on Document Numbers(BELNR).
Kindly share your knowledge on how this is done.
Regards,
Mahesh -
IV to post with Tax amount more than base amount
Hi Gurus,
One of our user want to post Invoice, with Tax amount more than Net value of goods.
Net amount of goods is 31.45 NZD, where as Tax amount is 99.43NZD.
Tax code assigned to PO is with 12.5%.
System is not allowing to post tax amount more than 12.5% of base, as tax code is assigned.
Kindly let me know, how we can post IV with more tax amount.
Thanks In advanceHello
I dont know if tax code is assigned for 12.5 then why does he wanat to post more tax. its not correct.
then also for reason u wnat to post then for posting that invoice go to FTXP and change the tax % in such a way that tax amount will match ur requirement
may be 316% so that the sustem while doing invoice willtake thie % and calculate tax
then again change the tax code % to 12.5
or
IN miro only u have a GL tab, i n that GL tab u can add tax gl account and add the tax amount so that it will come what u want .
if gl tab is not comming then active it in
spro--mm --logistic invioice ver incoming invoiceActivate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Account
hope this helps
Reward accordingly
Message was edited by:
Umakant Bhangale -
VAT amount to be posted in GBP currency during MIRO UK legal requirement
hello,
Our UK Company code has EUR as Currency key. This means that for this company code, the local currency is EUR. If it receives and pays invoices in EUR it has also to post the VAT amount in GBP shown by the vendor on his invoice according to UK VAT regulation. We need to be able to set the rate per invoice and not using the automatic one in the table for a fixed rate per month.
Indeed, the VAT guide (VAT700) makes it clear that the suppliers must show the sterling equivalents of the Net and VAT amounts on the VAT invoice. This means that the VAT amount posted will not depend on the exchange rate set up in the system.
In few words, we need the possibility for a EUR company code which receives an invoice in EUR to be able to post the VAT in GBP according to UK legal requirements.
The remaining problem now is to have the exchange rate field open for manual change!
i did go through SAP notes 776105 and 739958
can anyone help on this
regards
venkatprasadHi,
I think you can resolve this by working out the exchange rate used i.e. the GBP VAT amount vs the EUR amount and store that in a document field somewhere i.e. REF KEY3 or similar. Then you would need to grab the exchange rate from the document line and use that in the VAT report (Thinking user exit). The report would then reflect the GBP VAT amount as per invoice. This is not a clean solution but as you probably know the issue is due to the EUR currency being linked to a UK company code. I think in a GBP company code, the EUR invoice would open up a field for the tax exchange rate and the issue would be solved.
Anyway, there is probably a better way of doing the above...I just have not found one yet :-).
Thanks
Kris -
Posted Security Retention Amount in Company Code Currency
Hi All,
I want to know how amount is populated in "Posted Security Retention Amount in Company Code Currency" at PO History Table.
We have created PO with Retention, at the time of MIRO system is showing amount in "Retention Amount in Company Code Currency" this amount is posted in Special GL.
When we are making payment with Special GL, it is not showing any amount in "Posted Security Retention Amount in Company Code Currency" at PO History Column.
Any one please help me to understand how the amount is populated in this field.
Thanks!!!
Regards,
Vivek SrivastvaHi,
In PO you can mention the retention amount or percentage, as you told correctly at the time of MIRO it will post seperate line items for retention with spl gl.
while making payment in F-53, if you dont want to pay retention amount first just do as normal payment but while selecting the invoice you have to select one more line item with retention so that you can reduce the invoice amount while making the payment.
now you want to make the retention payment . go to F-53 while giving the selection parameters you have to give special gl indicator, then click on process open items. here it will show you the retention amount with spl gl indicator. if its not showing it depends on the layout you have selected.
check your layout desing.
thanks & regards,
shashi kanth.
want to know how amount is populated in "Posted Security Retention Amount in Company Code Currency" at PO History Table.
We have created PO with Retention, at the time of MIRO system is showing amount in "Retention Amount in Company Code Currency" this amount is posted in Special GL.
When we are making payment with Special GL, it is not showing any amount in "Posted Security Retention Amount in Company Code Currency" at PO History Column.
Any one please help me to understand how the amount is populated in this field. -
Procedure for Tax Amount Caliculation for Posting Invoice Application ?
Hi,
I got a problem when i am creating Invoice for PO with referrence to GRC.
in this case if PO & GRC Quantity & Amount are different then for which Amount & Quantity System will caliculate in MIRO Transaction ,in the same way i have to caliculate the Tax Amount otherwise system is not allowing to post Application using BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE.
Can anybody suggest me that from where i have to pick Tax Percentages & how i have to caliculate Tax Amount.hi
check your PO in the item detail invoice tab which has tax code field. -
Error while doing J1IH (Excise JV) - TR6 Challan posting
I am getting the following error while doing, J1IH (Excise JV) - TR6 Challan posting
Please assist....
Short text
The COMMIT WORK processing must not be interrupted.
What happened?
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "SAPLFACS" had to be terminated because it h
come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
What can you do?
Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
administrator.
Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
at and manage termination messages, and you can also
keep them for a long time.
Error analysis
During the COMMIT WORK statement, the following are executed:
- the routines registered with the statement PERFORM .. ON COMMIT,
- the registered methods for the events of the object services
and
- possibly the local update (SET UPDATE TASK LOCAL).
An exception was raised and caught. The normal sequence of the routines
was interrupted by this resulting in the program being continued before
the call of COMMIT WORK. As this can lead to inconsistencies, the
processing cannot be continued in the normal way.Thanks Milind...
I am also getting the following error:
Balance in transaction currency
Message no. F5702
Diagnosis
A balance has occurred in transaction currency 'INR' with the following
details:
Exchange rate '00', amount ' 500,000.00' and currency key 'INR'.
The data in the transaction currency were transferred from the calling
application.
System Response
Your data cannot be processed in FI.
Procedure
The error is probably in the calling application.
Please assist -
Issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision
Hi all,
I have an issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision. Please find below the details.
Inspection Lot 10000604689
Material 1730PCPBS.0031
Batch QP611097 GQ02
Out of total qty of 2100 we need to post the following
To unrestricted use 2,098
To sample usage 2
Following error appears,
Deficit of SL Stck.in qual.insp 1,638 NO : 1730PCPBS.0031 62GQ GQ02 QP611097
Message no. M7021
Diagnosis
Shortfall below the specified stock level or quantity amounting to 1,638 NO.
System Response
If the message is an error message (E), the above is not allowed.
If the message is a warning message (W), the system will allow your input, but the warning is intended to prevent you entering a wrong quantity.
Procedure
In the case of a warning message, check the quantity entered.
In the case of an error message, change the quantity or terminate processing.
I have checked that quantity 2100 of material 1730PCPBS.0031 is in QI stock. Kindly advice what is the issue and why we are getting the error?
Regards,
BrijeshHi Brijesh,
What is the status of inspection lot?
One of the possibilities I think could be inconsistencies between MM and QM.
Have a look on SAP note 48815- Checking possible inconsistencies between MM and QM.
Regards,
Anand Rao -
Clearing Customer down payment for down payment amount not equal to Customer Invoice amount
Dear All,
Below process are posting Customer transaction directly via FI without SD cycle.
Customer down payment = 102 INR
Customer Invoice = 103 INR
While doing Customer clearing w.r.t Invoice system has cleared the down payment document but posted an open item in Customer account with clearing document number of value Rs 102 .
Concern:-
1) How 1 INR difference will be countered , via receipt payment from customer from bank account ?
2) In case we have defined tolerance limit of 5% for Customer and this come to be > 1 INR ,does SAP provide clearing Customer items
automatically via any Standard Customer clearing process based on rule defined ?
Pls suggest
Regards
MJHi,
the information of the exchange rates used for down payments, is
stored in table TCURR ( exchange rates)
For the request down payment the actual exchange rate of table TCURR
or the rate of document header is taken.
When this down payment request is payed, also the exchange rate of
the actual day (TCURR) is taken.
That´s why the amount in the bank posting in local currency result
from translating the foreign currency amount at the current rate,
instead of resulting from the total of the local currency amounts
from the settled items.
Regards,
Attila
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi everyone, Recently I've noticed that my camera button on the phone is not working. It doesn't launch camera app and it doesn't take any pictures while in cam app, however I can focus with it. I'm on 4.4.2 and it doesn't have too many outside apps
-
I have to place a large number of PDF files. Sometimes I get an error: "Failed to open the PDF file". In the InDesign Forum I found that this also happens in the GUI from time to time and that the workaround is to turn on the Show Import Options. But
-
InDesign CS5.5 Out of memory error on a i7 2.8ghz imac with 12GB RAM
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4605576#4605576 this is the post that has much of the same issue but my difference is that i am on Indesign 5.5. To shed some more insight, I am trying to make a press quality PDF direct from Indesign. I have 2 pages i
-
Dynamically obtain parameter count for a prepared statement
Hi JDBC Gurus, Given a prepared statement, is there a way to figure out the parameter count at runtime? I need this info. to prompt the user for parameter values at the right time from my GUI tool. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
-
Problem with automatic payment program.
automatic paymnet program is calculating taxes on discount amount .can any one help me to solve this issue. thanks, monica