No detail level  objects in Voyager report

Hi All,
I created a report in Voyager workspace....Voyager does not show Detail level objects from the selection panel in the left and shows only Dimensions, and i want to use deatil level objects in reports.
I also see no formula tool bar. I am using an SAP BW query.
Please help. we are on BO xi 3.1 sp2, FP2.5
Edited by: pali1010 on Apr 26, 2010 10:47 PM
Edited by: pali1010 on Apr 26, 2010 10:48 PM

Display attributes have several string properties which are visible in Voyager:
u2022 Short description
u2022 Medium description
u2022 Long description
u2022 Key and short description
u2022 Key and medium description
u2022 Key and long description
These string properties can be viewed and changed from the Properties tab of the Tab panel.
Key and text properties are concatenated into a single string, and are therefore displayed in a single column or row caption field. They do not appear as separate columns or rows.
Now come to your question where youwant to se detail level.
Can you expand the dimension by clicking on the parent member?
It should expand.
Bashir Awan

Similar Messages

  • To create detailed level report which is preffered  cube or ods

    can any 1 plz justify for a new requirement ,detailed level reporting which is best and why.

    Hi Satish,
    Infocubes are preffered for Atomic and Summarized Reporting whereas DSOs are more detailed and granular.
    But there are certain major drawbacks of Using DSOs for Reporting :
    - Low performance as direct reporting will be extremly slow due to large amount of data stored in single table.
    - Multi-Dimensional analysis not possible.
    - Calculation overheads for KPIs
    Choice of DSO/Cube depends on the requirements but Infocubes are more preffered for reportings.
    Please check below links for more details to help make choice easier :
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b04a79b4-bbea-2b10-da86-bf0fe933fe34?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    http://infobyte.in/sap/(sap-bi)-difference-between-info-cube-and-dso-(datastore-object)/?action=printpage
    Regards,
    Akanksha

  • Navigating from detail level column in an hierarchy  to another report

    I have a requirement as folllows:
    In one report,i have a drill-down feature enabled on "TIME DIM".
    At The detail level of this dimension is "DAY" column.
    SO,from this detail level,when i click on "DAY" column, navigation should be done to another report..
    Is it possible to navigate so from detail report..
    pls let me know the solution for this requirement..
    thanks,
    seeusass

    Instead of Drill down,Give Navigation in first report to child report.But for this you need to create n reports if you are having n number of levels in hierarchy.Then at the detail level report you can give navigation at day level.
    Thanks
    Don

  • Possible bug when creating multiple detail view objects

    using jdev 11.1.1.0.0 to build jsf/adf applications. I wanted to report what seems like a bug in 11g. I have a parent table which has two child tables. After creating the appropriate entities, associations, views, and view links, the app module looks like this:
    MasterView
    --DetailView1
    --DetailView2
    The two detail view objects are on the same level, they are both direct children of the Master view.
    Here's what's happening:
    1) I create the master entity/view objects (MasterView)
    2) I create one of the detail entity/view objects (DetailView1).
    3) I create the association and view link to establish relationship between MasterView and DetailView1. Everything works fine.
    4) I create the entity/view objects for second detail view (DetailView2)
    5) When I attempt to create a second view link (based off an association) to establish the relationship between MasterView and DetailView2, the query clauses of the Create View Link wizard (screens 4 and 5) do not get created properly. I finish the wizard and save. Not only does this view link not get created properly, but in the process the query clauses that were defined in the first view link between MasterView and DetailView1 are wiped out. This will break any coordination between master and detail views in both the app module tester and runtime. Has anyone seen this problem?

    fyi, it looks like this issue has been resolved with jdev 11.1.1.0.2 (Update 2)

  • Business Objects 3.1 reports are not working with IE 10.

    Hi,
    Recently I upgraded my internet explorer to IE10.. Since then business objects 3.1 reports are not opening in IE10.0
    Getting error message "webpage can't be found".
    I am not sure whether BO 3.1 reports work with IE 10.0 or not.
    Please advise
    Thanks
    Sat

    Did you try with other browsers ?
    IE 10 (Compatibility View display mode) with Oracle Java 6 / Oracle Java 7 is supported for BOXI3.1 SP6.
    Please check the PAM for details of your SP level.

  • Adding a column in the Universe level without losing the Report Lay out

    Hi all,
    I have one universe with three universes built on it. Now, I want to add a column to one of the tables in the universe. For that, I selected the table and gave 'Refresh the structure'. The column got added in the workspace of the universe. When I drag and drop the table to the class & objects panel, it got added to the class/table in the panel. I saved and exported the universe.
    When I do like above, and open the report in the BO XI R3.1 webi front end, the report throws the following error:
    'Universe contains unresolved objects' and the report lay out is lost. All the three reports built on this universe is throwing the same error.
    Please let me know if there is any other way to retain the report lay out and add the column in the universe level.
    Thanks in advance
    - Regards,
      Arun

    Welcome to the sometimes frustrating world of working with dates against SAP BW via BusinessObjects!
    Your best bet here is to have a financial calendar table in a database and build a new query against that. Return Week Number as a detail of date and then merge the date dimensions.

  • No Fact table exists at this detail level error

    Hi All,
    I am trying to develop an RPD and was trying to use a simple example of joining two fact tables in OBIEE through confirmed dimension.
    This is my example:
    Fact A: Student ID (FK)......Measure1, Measure2...
    Fact B: Student ID (FK)........Measure A, Measure B
    DIM 1: Student ID (PK),.....
    I would like to give the users the option of joining Fact A and Fact B through Dim 1( Which is a conforming Dimension)
    I tried with out level based hierarchy and got NO Fact exists at this level of detail.
    Then I tried creating the level based hierarchy on Dim 1 and selected the detail level for the fact table and I am still getting the error message.
    Am i doing some thing wrong here ?  Or Am i missing any important setting ?
    Is there a way to check whether the dimension is a conforming dimension or not in OBIEE.
    Your help is much appreciated.
    Thanks
    Venu

    Can we use between operator in physical join. We did that, its successfully checking in, but when we re-open the join, its show in RED color.
    So, got doubt, can we use between?When you checkout the rpd object in online mode it would display in red, this is not an error.
    "No fact table exists at the requested level of detail"; what does this error meanThis error usually happens if you have not mapped the content level correctly in the logical table source.
    Rgds,
    Dpka

  • Detail info needed in the report

    Hi ,
    We have a summary infomation for one key figures(say sales value for item - "T-shirt" for example), but I don't have the info about the detail level info inside the item("T-shirt" -- color red, yellow or green). I want to know in the report about the detail sale info about how many sales for the red, yellow or green "T-shirt" respectively. but in the datasource, we only have the summary info about total sale vale for the "T-shirt".
    what is teh good way for us to solve this problem? we need to add the detial info into the datasource, or do some otehr calucation to make it done?
    Thanks,
    Ping

    Look, Ping, accroding to what we've done to our datasource, you may do the following:
    1. Let say the table for schedule line is 'A', and the field for color is 'a', i.e. 'A'-'a'.  Then the datasource for line item is 'B'.
    2. Enhance your 'B' with a new field, say 'b', which will be used to put in your 'A'-'a' value at line item level.
    3. Add abap code which will pick up 'A'-'a' when the value in sales order number and item number fields are equal in both 'A' and 'B'. After that, insert your 'A'-'a' value into the 'B'-'b' field.
    4. Run RSA3 in your source system, then you will see 'B'-'b' field which contain 'A'-'a' value for each of your line items.
    Since I am not an ABAPer, I do not know how to write codes.  If you do need some sample codes, you could just email me a [email protected]
    Cheers,
    Peng

  • Need organization level object

    HI,
    I am want to insert organization level in this S_ALR_87012294 report,
    but in PFCG->Authorization->authorization change show no organization level,
    is there any authorization object for giving organization level.
    Best Regards
    Dilip Pasila

    The note says that you can apply it as a "download" via SNOTE ahead of the Support Pack (level), or apply the whole Support Packs up to that level (which will include the "corrections), or you can install a brand new ERP system on the highest current release and SP stack.... but in all cases the checks are not performed against these objects until you modify the code in a SAP standard include program to activate the check.
    I can understand backward compatibility with existing role concepts, however a "normal" procedure to not perform such new checks is an approach something like the default values of PRGN_CUST are used for, where you can activate the checks via customizing views (for each of the three objects independently) when you need them or discover the gap. Then in some higher release you can switch the defaults to "ON" if the requirement / opportunity is there.
    It also makes it easier to implement, transport and perform cross system comparisons of settings.
    Forcing customers to make a modification to the standard system at each installation to close a security hole is about as elegant a software logistics solution as a frontal lobotomy is to peace of mind...
    I will add this to the [Security Functionality Wishlist in the Wiki|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Security/SecurityFunctionalityWishlist-Topics] and suggest you check your systems to see whether your F_BKPF_BE* object security has a hole in the bottom of the bucket.
    For me it is self-explanatory that this should be changed, but the inventors of it wanted to know whether it is just me or possibly a whole mob out there wanting it (and possibly not knowing about it either).
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • Fixing at aggregate level & unfixing at detailed level.

    Hi,
    Our requirement is as given below......
    Our Demand Planning Process is Top-down process. Head Quarter will enter the demand at Territory, Channel and Product Group Level. These values are fixed and gets disaggregated to further planning level based on historical sales. The further planning levels are Sales Officer, Location & Product. Territory Manager can change the demand with in his targets across Sales officers (i.e. he should be able to change the targets of Sales officers without exceeding or reducing the Territory targets).
    Can anyone suggest how to fix the keyfigures at Aggregate Level without fixing it at detailed level. We tried FIX_CALC macro, but could not resolve the issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    SP

    You need to create AGGREGATES in your PLANNING OBJECT STRUCTURE, right click on POS and create  the following aggregates
    (1) ALL TERRITORY characteristics
    Now you will be able to fix at the top level and still be able to change at the detailed level.
    Read the following:* Let me know if you have any questions*
    Aggregate  
    Definition
    The aggregates in APO are not the same as those in the Business Information Warehouse (BW), but they have the same purpose: to speed up data access and therefore increase performance.  SAP recommends that you use aggregates in Demand Planning.
    These aggregates are sometimes referred to as persistent aggregates, in particular when talking about detail and aggregate levels in interactive planning.
    Use
    An APO aggregate contains a subset of the characteristics in the master planning object structure. The creation and use of aggregates is optional. The data is always saved on the lowest level of detail. If aggregates exist, the system saves the planning data on the defined aggregate levels as well as on the lowest level of detail. The data is saved twice, but consistently; that is, the sum of the details equals the aggregate value.
    SAP recommends that the aggregates you build in APO for planning data also exist in BW for actual data.
    If you want to save fixed values at aggregate level ; that is not at detail level of the master planning object structure, in a planning book, you must create aggregates for this level. Otherwise the data is only saved at detail level.
    You cannot form aggregates for navigational attributes
    See also:
    Fixing Key Figure Values
    Aggregates are discussed in detail in OSS note 503363. SAP recommends that you read this note thoroughly before configuring your master planning object structures and aggregate hierarchy.

  • ISE 1.2 - Posture Detail Assessment - enforcement audit mode report not show status for non-compliant

    ISE 1.2 - Posture Detail Assessment - enforcement audit mode report not show status for non-compliant.
    - For old version 1.1.4 it can be reported for non-compliant, How can I generate report for this? 
    Thanks
    Kosin Usuwanthim

    It used to be in there (id 226635 is the last one with it); should I clean it up a bit and put it back with a bit more of a disclaimer?

  • How to keep an application level object running with SunIDM?

    We are working on intergrate a gmail project with SunIDM. We need an application level object running with SunIDM so it will maintain a token generated from Gmail side. In anther servlet project, I had this object saved in the attribute of the ServletContext, then other session level servlet could share this attribute anytime. Is there a way to store attribute in Servlet Context and have it shared by different user session in SunIDM? I have been reading documents and searched this forum, haven't find any topics related how to maintain an application level object live. Hopefully that I can get some hint here.
    Thank you so much.

    Paul, Thank you so much for the further explaination. I don't think it will work since the token generated from gmail will expire every 24 hours.
    We are using the gdata library published from by gmail people, and I create a new UserService object and have it run in the application level. The UserService object will generate a token and renew it every 24 hours behind the scene. Here is how I implement it in my Servlet project:
    //to have a UserService object running at the application level:
    public class GmailUserService extends HttpServlet {
    public void init(ServletConfig config) throws ServletException{
    super.init();
    userService = new UserService(myApplication);
    config.getServletContext().setAttribute("gmailUserService", userService);
    //to access this UserService object from other servlet in each user session:
    UserService userService = (UserService)servletContext.getAttribute("gmailUserService");
    Gmail will trigger an error if we create a new UserService object for each user. They recommend to have all the user to share one UserService object. I am looking for similar approach in SunIDM.
    Thank you again, Paul, for trying to help.

  • Can't add database field or text object to a report (new and existing)

    We have Crystal Report 8.5 and when trying to modify an existing report or create a new report, I can't seem to add any database fields or text objects in my report.  I get a prohibition symbol (circle with a backslash inside it) when I hover over the report.  Has anyone encoutered something like this? Any suggestions?  Thank you.

    Do you have two monitors?
    I had this problem if I tried to open crystal in the second monitor, move it back to primary monitor and it should be OK.
    Ian

  • "Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory: Exchange organization-level objects have not been created, and setup cannot create them because the local computer is not in the same domain and site as the schema master. Run se

    Team,
    I am trying to Install Exchange on my Lab, getting below error
    message.
    The Schema Role is installed on Root Domain and trying to install
    exchange on Child domain.
    1 Root Domain - 1 Child domain. both are located on single site.
    “Setup encountered a problem while validating
    the state of Active Directory: Exchange organization-level objects have not been created, and setup cannot create them because the local computer is not in the same domain and site as the schema master. Run setup with the /prepareAD parameter and wait for
    replication to complete.”
    Followed below articles:
    http://support.risualblogs.com/blog/2012/02/21/exchange-2010-sp2-upgrade-issue-exchange-organization-level-objects-have-not-been-created-and-setup-cannot-create-them-because-the-local-computer-is-not-in-the-same-domain-and-site-as-the-sche/
    http://www.petenetlive.com/KB/Article/0000793.htm
    transferred the schema roles to different server on root domain, still no luck.
    can someone please help me.
    regards
    Srinivasa k
    Srinivasa K

    Hi Srinivasa,
    I guess, you didn't completed the initial setup schemaprep and adprep before starting the installation. You can do it as follows:
    1. Open command Prompt as administrator and browse to the root of installation cd and run Setup.exe /PrepareSchema /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms
    After finishing this,
    2. Setup.exe /PrepareAD /OrganizationName:"<organization name>" /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms
    3. To prepare all domains within the forest run Setup.exe /PrepareAllDomains /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms. If you want to prepare a specific domain run Setup.exe /PrepareDomain:<FQDN of the domain you want to prepare> /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms
    4. Once you complete all of the 3 steps, install the pre-requisities for Exchange 2013
    5. Finally, run the setup program
    Hope this will help you
    Regards from Visit ExchangeOnline |
    Visit WindowsAdmin

  • Add an extra :Tab" on the Purchase Order's ITEM DETAIL level.

    Hi:
    Can anyone please tell me how I go about to add an additional "TAB" on the Item Detail level of a Purchase Order...??
    Thanks.
    W.

    It is not possible to add extra tab by configuration .you have to use user exit/BADI to get this .
    user exit :MM06E005 
    BADI : ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
    consult with your abaper for developemnt

Maybe you are looking for