Process Order creates Multiple Inspection for Same Batch

Hi Guys,
Expert opinion is needed to have this issue fixed.
Issue:When a new Process Order is created it automatically creates in storage location A. There are times when a process order needs to be created into another storage location B. When the Process Order is created and then is changed from A to B it will create two inspection lots for one batch, one for each storage location. From the plant perspective they only need one Inspection lot as they will not create two set of samples for testing since it is the same batch it just went into a different storage location then it was originally created for. Is there a way to change SAP so that it only creates one Inspection lot per batch.
Control InspLot field in QM view for Insp Type 04 is X
We had different scenarios with same Batch
SCENARIO #1: Sloc is changed to B prior to Release, in CRTD status of order Sloc was A
So there are 2 Insp. Lot created one for A & another for B after GR in Sloc B
SCENARIO #2: Sloc is changed to B after Release
IL is created after Release of order with Sloc A, after changing Sloc B in process order and performing GR, new IL is created for Sloc B
Business scenario is certain times of the year where one creates a PO with one Sloc and then it needs to be GR into a different Sloc.
They are generating a lot of IL’s that are not used and it seems like every year they need to get UD’s made on IL’s for finance to close out the year which is cumbersome.
Please suggest way out, objective is one process should have one IL per Batch irrespective of Sloc
Regards
Nitin Desai

There are several things that come to mind.
First and foremost, get the planning right so that the process orders are created properly the first time around. This is a business issue. Yes.. I don't know your business.. no, you really aren't all that different then the thousands of other businesses using SAP. The root cause of this is you don't know what is going where when you order it or in the case of process orders, where you intend to make it or store it. That's a basic planning problem.
2 - you must have early lot creation turned on, "Y". You can't be using "X". X would only create an 04 lot when you do the GR so if you change the storage location prior to the Process order being released I'm not sure how you are generating two lots. Are you sure all the lots in question are 04 lots? Are you maybe seeing an 03 lot? Or possibly an 08 lot? Something doesn't sound right here.
3 - If you receive into two storage locations from one process order, you will get two inspection lots. No way around this. There is stock associated with these. You could use customization to suppress the second receipt but that stock would go right to UR with no inspection.
4. Don't change the storage locations in the process orders at all. You can use the stock posting screen in the UD and change the storage location when you make the UD.
5. Another option is to again, don't change the storage location in the PO but use QAC2 transaction to transfer the inspection lot into the proper storage location.
You need to explain your scenarios better cause I really don't see how you are getting the two lots when you make all your changes in the process order prior to releasing the process order. That doesn't make any sense at all.
Craig

Similar Messages

Syncing ical creates multiple entries for same event

I'm sure this is common. I cal sync creates multiple enties for the same event. Any way to work around this?
Also, duplicate calendars are on the Iphone (2 for inbox) can one be deleted?

I think I know what can help. I also support Mac users in a mixed environment, and find that being able to access a Windows machine to test settings for my iCal users is very very helpful. If you do not have one, I could also fix this one by adding the user's account to my one Mac that runs Entourage.
On a PC: set up one of the problem accounts in Outlook, then go to Tools->Options & click on the Delegates tab. Click on a Delegate name (if they all have the same permission level, you can select all), then click the Permissions button. If the delegate have "Editor" permissions, there will be a little checked box that sends the delegate copies of all those meetings. De-select it.
Lemme know if you want Entourage instructions or if that does it for you.
The real question, of course, is why are there so many Exchange functions that iCal can't touch. Grrrr....

While creating Process Order system has to validate the Batch field

Hi All,
While creating the Process Order system has to validate the Batch field which comes under Goods Receipt tab. Please let me know is there any standard user-exit is there for this requirement.
Regards
Naveen

Dear Swapnil,
Thanks for the reply,
At the time of creation of process order I am entering the External Batch no as per the logic i.e. first two letters as 08 (for year), next two letter as section 51 (for solid mfg section, which i am planning to maintained in the Z table) and last three letters as 001 (for serial no in this section). so batch no is 0851001.
Now i want to validate these all letters as per the above logic i.e first two letter should be cross check with current year, and next two letter with Z table for section and last three letters for sr no with previous batch, which is already created for this section.
Now can you please help me to find out the function exit or screen exit to validate the above requirement at the time of creation of process order i.e. COR1, under the Goods receipt tab.
Thanks in advanced
Naveen

I want to create a mail merge for address labels into a table, but when I fill a table with merge fields, it ends up creating multiple entries for the same address, rather than one table full of each address.

...but when I fill a table with merge fields, it ends up creating multiple entries for the same address, rather than one table full of each address. Please help.
Thanks!

That is a quirk of Pagesthat it applies only one record per page.
There is a way around this:
http://www.freeforum101.com/iworktipsntrick/viewtopic.php?t=245&highlight=labels &mforum=iworktipsntrick
Peter

Creating multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to store multiple values for same properties

Hi All:
I am trying to create multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to
store multiple values for same properties. Here my intention of using
'unified profile types' is to create multiple profiles (to store multiple
values for a property). All the properties are stored in the same database
maintained by Personalization server. Also, I am trying to use the same
'USER' ejb as profile class/home/pk/jndi.
The scenerio is,
define unified profile types (Business, Vacation) using Personalization
admin tools, using com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.User,
com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.UserHome,
com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.UserPk,
com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.User for Profile Class, Home, Pk class,
JNDI name respectively.
Define Property set 'HotelCommerce' with property
HotelProp as single, restricted, text (valid values Single, Double)
Now you can use the attached jsp files to login as a user and try to set the
property value for HotelProp for each profile. As per my understanding, I
was expecting that I can set different values for the property 'HotelProp'
for each profiles. But unexpectedly, all the profiles get the same value.
Question. is it the correct behavior? if yes, how can I achieve this
functionality?
if not, do you see any problem in my scripts?
your answer asap is appreciated. we need to make decision on using
Personalization server v/s developing our own Personalization server!!!:)
thanks,
-rajesh
PS: I have tried 'Unified Profile Example' type too, but that did not work.
[propsettest.jsp]
[home.jsp]

I am trying to create multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to
store multiple values for same properties. Here my intention of using
'unified profile types' is to create multiple profiles (to store multiple
values for a property). All the properties are stored in the same database
maintained by Personalization server. Also, I am trying to use the same
'USER' ejb as profile class/home/pk/jndi.Hello Rajesh,
This is not the purpose of the UUP. The UUP is used to allow existing
database schemas to be aggregated with the existing Weblogic Personalization
Server database schema to provide a single, customized user profile with which
to maintain the user properties (
http://e-docs.bea.com/wlcs/p13n/users.htm#1068901 )
If you want to have properties that change value based on some "profile" or
classification of a user, then you should use classifier rules to change the
user from "OnVacation" to "AtWork" or "AtHome". You can use these classifier
rules to select content for the user or conditionally execute logic (
http://e-docs.bea.com/wlcs/p13n/rules.htm )
Ture Hoefner
BEA Systems, Inc.
1655 Walnut Street; suite 200
Boulder, CO 80302
www.beasys.com

How to create multiple BOM of same parent item?

Hi All,
Please guide me, How to create multiple BOM of same parent item? I tried but system throws a message as same Parent Item already exist in the table. I am afraid if system supports this functionality or not?

Hi,
You are welcome.......
Well the exact process would be as I mentioned in my previous post.
1. Create the BOM for an item
2. Choose this item in the Production Order
3. Then in this Production order you can change/ delete/ add whichever item you want .
OR
If all the child items are completely different from the original BOM then you can use the Special Type BOM in which you can always create the BOM while creating the Production Order itself. There is no standard BOM here.
J Nagesh

Adding Distribution KEY (GLEI) to a new Component at Process order Create

Hello Experts.
We have a Process Order where all components have the GLEI Distribution Key assigned. FOr this particular Process order, our Scheduler routinely adds an additional Material Component (with a specific batch number to save operators from having to key in the batch number when reorting production). The problem is, that when she adds this additional component, the Distribution Key field is greyed out so we cannot assign the GLEI key. This causes the demand for that particular item to show on dates that dont work for us. Should it be possible to manually assign the GLEI key to components at the Process Order create stage?
*Note, I have also tried adding the extra component at the Planned order stage, and while the screen allows me to enter all of the details (including Distribution key), when I save the Planned order, the new component does not get saved.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

closing thread

Recurring inspection for a batch with early date

Dear Gurus,
I have a batch with retest date 31.07.2010
I need to create the inspection lot of recurring inspection for this batch today.
I use transaction QA07, but this will not work for days earlier than today.
I tried to create the lot manually, the lot was created but the quantity was not transferred to the Quality inspection and remained unrestricted.
I need to create the lot and transfer the quantity to quality inspection....how can I handle this case?
Regards,
MaX

Well, nothing is unacceptable. It's just that it needs a lot of documentation. You don't change the date and leave it. You change the date, manually run QA07 to create the 09 inspection and immediately change the date back again. With proper documentation and approval from the QA department this shouldn't be an issue. I am assuming this is a one time thing. It's not like you are advocating a new business process.
The batch record should already be self documenting already and show a record of all changes. While the FDA would frown on this being a regular business practice, if it is something that happens once and the proper paperwork is done. It shouldn't be an issue. It would however cause an auditor to probably ask what caused this in the first place, what was the corrective action applied to prevent it from happening again, how many times has this happened and is it expected to happen in the future. If all of that can be answered, there shouldn't be any issue.
FF

How to create multiple instance on same database

Hi ,
I would like to know how to create multiple instance on same database . I know that some people use database configuration assistant to do this but i could not figure out how they did it.
Any how if some one can help me with this and can give me links of this it would be great help for me.
Thank you for reading my problem and helping me !
Amil
please if possible mail me on [email protected]

How to create multiple instance?????Do you mean multiple instances on the same database, or multiple databases on the same machine ?
I m new to this field....
Willin to learn a lot about oracle....Then it wouldn't be bad reading a bit of Database Concepts

Is creating multiple FileInputStream for one file OK?

Are there any issue with creating multiple FileInputStream for a single file? I have code that reads from a same file in multiple threads. Presumably, it should be ok since the file is being opened as read-only with FileInputStream. I have not seen any problem with it, but I want to be sure that there are no issues with doing this.
Jae

i think that is no problem,becase when you complete creating a FileInputStream,
the FileInputStream is autocephaly and have't relation with File,but Class File is differ in this ,if you create much new File() from one file ,System will report a err.

Lock the production order creating without material for order type zp01

Hi all,
Good morning.My client wants to lock the production order creating without material for order type zp01.He does not want to create production order without material.Its very urgent.Please guide me the settings if any.
Thanks and Regards
Sukumar

Hi Sukumar,
You can do by applying user exit.
Use PPCO0007 - Exit when saving production order.
Function module - EXIT_SAPLCOZV_001.
Include Program - ZXCO1U06
Write your Code:
*& Include ZXCO1U06
Regards,
Sankaran

Reg:Multiple UOMs for same item

Hi,
How to define the multiple UOMs for same item.And the item should be converted in one UOM.
Iam using 9.0 PL.08

Hi,
Please check SAP help file:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo900/helpdata/en/89/7ca0a701c64e4a97f4ea5a4edca8b2/content.htm?frameset=/en/44/c4c1cd7ca22e17e10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

How to avoid multiple listing for same artist?

How to avoid multiple listing for same artist?

Sounds like there might be blanks in the artist name.
For instance "Lou Reed" and "Lou Reed_" will not match.
(Pretend the underscore _ is a blank).
Select all the Lou Reed songs, Get Info, and type "Lou Reed" in the artist field. That should fix it.

Create inbound delivery for same material with multiple batches

Hi Experts,
An ASN( advanced shipping notification) contains multiple batch numbers for same material or line item.An IDOC has different segments with batch numbers but in SAP while creating Inbound delivery(VL31N) only batch number ( segment) get posted automatically in SAP other batches are need to post manuaaly.
I am using IDoc type : Delivery03 ,Message type: DESADV
How to resolve this problem?
Thanks,
Anil

Hi Anil,
Welcome to SCN for your first post. Did you check with your functional people about this.
Regards,
Madhu.

WebTools Creating multiple users for the same User

I had to make a few changes to a BP in SAP which will synch back into WebTools but now I am getting multiple users for the same contact. For example my user is cspehar_1 now in Webtools there are cspehar_1, cspehar_2, cspehar_3 and so on up to _8.
This is occuring for several users in webtools.
What causes this and how do I fix it?
Thanks,
Craig Spehar

Hi Craig,
There are two ways to cause this that I am aware of:
1. Change the "Business Partner Synch Contacts Field" setting after the initial synch.
2. Change the Web UserID on the BP contact in B1 (OCPR.U_PRX_SID).
After that, update the user in WT and synch. (might also happen if you update the BP in B1)
Since the synch is using the OCPR.U_PRX_SID to identify the contact, it will not be able to find it in B1 if the U_PRX_SID has changed. When it does not find it, it assumes it needs to be created. This results in a duplicate.
The solution is to reset the U_PRX_SID back to what it was or set the synch contact field back to what it was.
Then delete the last created duplicate contact from B1.
There may be further data corruption issues here. If orders/quotes/opportunities or other dependant data has synchronized referencing the duplicate user, these data will need to be correct as well.
FYI, whatever caused this was probably at the root of your order problem as well.

Process Order creates Multiple Inspection for Same Batch

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for