No VPRS cost in invoice

I got an invoice with VPRS value as zero, althought it has value on other invoices and in MM03.
In the analysis its says: VPRS  111     Condition ignored (requirement 004 not fulfilled)
The delivery has different batchs, it may be because those batch have different costs?
I did notice that in the document flow of this particular Invoice, there is an extra document: "Confirmation of Service"
But I have check in MM03 and the material looks the same as others which do not have this problem, and not all invoices for this material have this problem.
How can i find why this happened?
Thank you.
Regards,
Carlos

Per documentation for the routine 004, it reads "It also verifies that the plant is set, the valuation area company code and the sales organization's company code are identical, and that the item is not a down payment item." So you may check these parameters for this particular invoice. You may also need to check change histories in the preceding and current billing document. Also read OSS Note 547570 - FAQ: VPRS in pricing for details on how cost is being calculated.
Regards,

Similar Messages

  • VPRS Cost Condition type

    Hello,
    I have copied VPRS cost condition type & created a new cost condition type ZABC for the purpose of recognizing cost for a project.
    When i create sales order VPRS & ZABC cond types are getting populated  in sales order with correct cost but when i create Invoice , VPRS is getting copied correctly from sales order whereas ZABC is not getting copied from sales order, It shows value $0   When i double click on ZABC , it shows "Inactive via formulae of incorrect".
    Not sure if this is due to this error or some other error?
    Copy control looks fine since it is copying all other cond types correctly.
    VPRS & ZABC both are statistical.
    Can someone help.
    Thanks,
    Manny

    Hi Manny,
    SAP does not recommend have more than one condition of type 'G' in general because only the first condition obtains the goods issue value as a condition value. For additional conditions, the special logic of condition category 'G' is lost.
    Please refer to note 547570 about this.
    If you still need the 2nd cost condition appears in the billing document, please consider the possible solution provided in
    Note 15462.
    Regards,
    Alex

  • VPRS Cost vs Goods Issue Cost Mov. 653

    Hi experts,
    i have this problem:
    1) i make a Sales Order type credit note request using VA01 in reference to an invoice.
    2) the VRPS condition comes from the original invoice and that is ok.
    3) the system works with average cost
    4) when i do the goods issue posting in VL02N, the systems does a movement type 653 and the related FI document considers the cost from material  master record and it doesnt consider the VPRS cost from the credit note request.
    Example:
    Master Record has 120 USD as cost 'V' for 1000 PC
    VPRS in Credit Note Request is 100 USD 1000 PC
    FI document related to 653 movement considers 120 USD for 1000 PC
    I need that FI doc considers the VPRS cost. How can i do that?
    Thanks a lot,
    Alejo

    Looks like you are using Price control V - Moving Average cost in your material master. Try to use Price Control S and the VPRS will be stable in all the documents. T Code MM02 - Give your material - Costing 2 tab - Under Valudation data check the price control.
    Regards
    Sai

  • Vprs cost 0

    Dear Friends,
    In our client requirements,  when the  sales returns at the time  vprs cost should be zero,  but this is not possible in sap standard  , in this case any user exit for this, any other routines in this case
    Thanks Regards
    sathish
    [email protected]

    Suggession: Maintain condition type VPRS as D - not possible to process manually. then let the Material Master have the costing mainatained . Then VPRS flows into your order automatically from your Line item.
    Possible solution can be there are few OSS notes for copy controls from delivery to invoice which deals with VPRS. Please have a look at them.
    Regards
    sai

  • VPRS cost not flowing when plant is changed

    Hi all,
    I have a scnenario where :
    1. The customer places an order to a Sales org 1000 whose company code is 1000.
    2. The goods are to be delivered from plant 2000 which belongs to company code 2000
    3. Material X is present in Plant 1000 and has been extended to Plant 2000
    4. The assignment of plant 2000 to sales Org 1000 and DC 10 exists.
    5.  When the user enters plant 2000 in the sales order item level the VPRS cost does not flow into the order, but if he enters the plant 1000 (which is assigned to compnay code 1000) at the item level the VPRS seems to flow perfectly well.
    6. I checked the pricing analysis. It shows ( when user enters plant 2000) requirement 004 is not met.
    One of the conditions requirement 004 checks is that the valuation Areas (Plant 2000) company code and the sales organizations (1000) company code should be same. Does this means that I have to assign plant 2000 to Company code 1000?
    My question is that is it necessary for the valuation Areas (Plant 2000) company code and the sales organizations (1000) company code should be same for VPRS to flow? Isn't the  assignment of plant 2000 to sales Org 1000 and DC 10 enough for the VPRS to flow?
    Is there any other setting that is required or am I miising out on some setting.
    Please help.
    Thanks and Regards,
    J Nagesh

    Hi,
    Your scenario is inter company sales
    When you selling it from company 1000 and sales orgz 1000 and plant 1000 VPRS update
    But when you deliver it from plant 2000 it becomes inter company at this stage VPRS will not appear rather is will update PI01 or PI02 condition and this become cost for company/sales orgz/plant 1000
    Kindly see price procedure RVAA01and see intercompany condition and vprs conditions
    Kapil

  • VPRS Cost not pickibng only for single sales order

    Hello Gurus
    Goodevening every body
    If we maintain  two prices  in material master one is moving average and another  one  is stanrdard price which  price the system will pick in the  sales order of my pricing procedure.
    Note-Only for one sales order system is not picking  VPRS  cost in my sales when was doing testing and giving some  message  in condition analysis -VPRS     111 Condition ignored (requirement 004 not fulfilled)
    I tried to analysis it but not able to come final conclusion this  message
    I am looking for your inputs
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Venkat

    Something wrong in the "item category" settings for that material.
    Pls activate "determine cost" control in the item category setting.
    Revert back for confirmation.
    Rgds
    Sumanth.Gururaj
    Consultant/Systems Analyst - SAP SD/MM

  • VPRS Cost

    Hi Expert,
    How the VPRS condition type automatically fetches the cost of the material in the sales order.
    Thanks in advance.
    Warm regards,
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    Please check the requirement routine in pricing.
    For VPRS, Requirement should be 4.
    Also ensure that plant is determined for your line item.
    If not, please specify the plant manually in sales order or maintain plant in Customer master or material master.
    Now definitely you will get VPRS cost in the sales order.
    Thanks,
    A.Govin

  • VPRS Costs From Purchase Order Account Assignment To Sales Order

    Hi,
    If i assign a purchase order costs to a sales order using the account assignment category C or E, can the purchase order costs be passed on to VPRS condition type of the sales order?
    This is different from third party order processing. I know for third party order processing the VPRS costs can be passed from the purchase order, but my above scenario is different from third party order function whereby i create a purchase order and a sales order separately and then link them using the account assignment category of the purchase order and need to know if the VPRS cost can be updated from the purchase order.
    Has anyone tried this?

    Has anyone tried this?
    I never tried this, but looks like similar to third party scenario only. You can just test the scenario to understand the system behavior. For details on how the VPRS is calculated by the system, you can refer OSS Note 372772 - How is the cost determined?
    Regards,

  • VPRS cost copying different in Returns order and Credit for returns

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    we created returns order, returns delivery and Credit for Returns.But the VPRS cost copying in Credit for Returns different than Returns order.I have tested in DEV its working fine but in PRD its taking different. I compared copy contrls,condition settings and pricing procedure i didnt found any difference. where i need to check other than these areas.
    Regards,
    Nooka

    Hi,
    If if works in DEV then there is no problem with configuration.(Compare configuration of DEV with PRD).
    Please check that all change request are moved correctly or not,speciallty related to your scenario.
    Any enhancement  change request are moved or not.(Because DEV and PRD are different clients. Some requests are client specific.)
    Thanks,
    Vrajesh
    Edited by: Vrajesh G. Nayak on Jan 20, 2010 5:23 AM

  • VPRS cost giving error

    Dear friends.
    I have a requirement from client. that they want to take VPRS cost as the basic price and calculate the rest on this basis. Now based on this requirement: I have changed the basic price VPRS & statistical, subtotal as B & requirement as 4.
    But now when I am creating the Sales order it is giving an error net value is not found.
    Kindly help.
    EKS

    Pls maintain the cost of the material in material master(standard price or moving average price).
    Now maintain the condition record for all the condition types, whose values should be calculated based on the value of the condition type VPRS.
    Make sure that all the mandatory condition types in your pricing procedure will have some values in the doucment.
    If these things are taken care of, then your problem will not come.

  • Vprs cost excluded+ Cond type JIND ineffective.

    hi,
       in my pricin procedure i have this error as VPRS cost being ineffective and hence not applied in my pricing.
    can any one specify the details of VPRS cond type just to verify as to how its getting applicable.
    also if for J1AU cond. type i have access sequence JIND.
    plz elaborate on its specific details like cond. rec, calc.type,acc.key.

    Hi Friends,
    Thanks for your reply as per your instruction I have maintained cond type and also in Pric procedure I removed 4 from Requirement column.
    Now I am getting following error,
    Diagnosis
    This condition has not been determined using condition records. The amount or value should be determined from another data source. For cost (condition category 'G') it is read using conditions from the material valuation segment, for a cash discount condition it is read using conditions from the terms of payment table.
    In this transaction an error occurs - the material valuation segment or the terms of payment table could not be read or a currency translation has failed.
    System Response
    The condition has been provided with the deactivated indicator 'X'.
    Procedure
    Refer to the messages in the status line of the condition overview screen.
    Regards,
    Shrikant

  • Third Party VPRS cost needs to be redetermine in F2 invoice.

    HI All,
    Can anybody tell me how we can update VPRS in billing as per MIRO invoice. following are the steps that i am following to process this process:
    1-Sales Order with item category TAS and purchase Req authomatically created.
    2-Purchase order created with ref to PR.
    3-Inbound Dlivery create with ref to PO
    4-MIRO create with ref to inbound delivery
    5- create customer invoice for two material
    a- with value
    b without value
    a-with value vprs is comming from material master
    b-without value is now showing any value.
    thanx in advance.....
    Regards,
    Danish

    Hello
    As per the standard Third party process, cost in the billing document will be picked from Invoice receipt of the vendor (MIRO).
    Basically here the cost determination happens from below three sources.
    1. MIRO (invoice receipt of Vendor)
    2.Goods receipts (MIGO )
    3.Purchase order
    Highest priority is given to the number 1. MIRO.
    In your both the cases, kindly check MIRO price & quantitiy.
    thank you
    Anirudh

  • Cost in invoice in the case of third party drop ship scenario

    Hello ALL
    We have third party drop ship scenario where vendor drop ships the goods to customer on our behalf and once we get the confirmation from vendor we bill the customer.  The sales order line has TAS item category.  When we raise the invoice the cost and billing quantity (because billing quantity is 'E' in copy control) comes from the goods receipt.  The PO is an import PO and has custom duty (delivery cost conditon) as well.  The custom duty is significant and hence when we create billing doc from sales order we want the custom duty also to come along with the material pirce as cost to the billing doc. Currently, the billing doc has material price from goods receipt as cost. 
    Can we get both price and custom duty as cost through some config or some change in PO pricing schema?  Or is there an user exit that can be used to manipuate the same?
    This is a common scenario in India and hence if anybody has come across this already and can share the solution, it will be great.
    Thanks in advance.
    Rajeev Jain

    Hi,
    You can do like this.
    Create a cost condition type ( copy of VPRS) and place it properly in the pricing procedure. sub total field must be B to collect the cost. Place a account key and maintain the G/L account for it also.
    In the requirement you can develop a new requirement saying that in case of TAS item category system should check for the cost of the item from a PO, and you can get the total of customs and price to by writing a logic. To develop the program and logic discuss with your developer.
    Thanks,
    Venkat Cheedalla

  • VPRS - cost not updating with Subsequent Debit

    We have an issue with the VPRS price in VF03 not updating if a subsequent debit is processed after initial vendor invoice and customer billing has been processed. (for third party processing)
    There is no problem if a vendor invoice and subsequent debit is processed before customer billing.  There is also no problem if if a vendor invoice and subsequent debit is processed after customer billing.  There is only an issue when the vendor invoice is received first, then customer billing then subsequent debit applied.
    Can someone describe how the VPRS on the billing document is updated in SAP? Any information on how to fix this would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi,
    In the order, the cost is generally taken from the valuation segment
    of the material master. In the billing document, however, it may have
    other sources. Depending on the business transaction, the costs can be taken from the goods issue of the billed delivery or, in the case of a
    third-party order processing or individual purchase order, from the
    respective purchase order, the goods receipt or the invoice verification in purchasing. As an example, only the goods issue will be mentioned here. However, the descriptions also apply to costs from purchase orders, goods receipts or invoice verifications. These costs are entered externally in pricing and included in the value of the VPRS condition. The amount is obtained by calculating back amount = value / quantity.
    Thanks
    Krishna.

  • Cost in Invoice

    Hi,
    In Invoice there is one column of "Cost".
    From where this cost comes?
    How this cost get calculated?
    In my some invoices this cost getting copyed and in some this cost showing zero value
    what is the reason for this?
    Regards,
    Akshay

    I believe you were talking about the VPRS condition type flowing in condition tab.
    System is fetching value from Accounting1 view of material master.  Wherever the value flows, costing run has been made and wherever value is not flowing, costing run has not been done for that material.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

Maybe you are looking for