No work item exist in sxmb_moni_bpe

Hi experts,
iam working with a senario using BPM iam not able to execute my senario plz help me in this case.
Senario details.
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
check above link i have done same senario.when iam executing it iam getting an error in SXMB_MONI_BPE (No work item exist).now plz help me what to do.
Regards,
Phani

Hello Phani,
  Go to SXI_CACHE--->Integration Processes
Identify your service and check the return code, it should be 0.
If this is not 0, then Repeat Activation, this will happen when your user doent have sufficient authorizations.
Let me know if it was not the case...
Regards,

Similar Messages

  • BPM error : No Work Items Exist

    With reference to the BPM related weblog
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1822. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    My input file is picked by sender communication channel, but have not reached on the receiver. In SXMB_MONI_BPE, I selected my service and tried to execute, the message is "No Work Items Exist".
    Any suggestions on this....

    Hi,
    Go to SXI_CACHE and check the status of your BPM. The return status of your BPM should be 0 . If not, try to activate your BPM from there.
    Also, do a semantics check on your BPM by pressing f7. It will display any semantics error if any.
    chk out these threads wher the same issue is being referred
    Re: No object type found for this message
    BPE_ADAPTER error on async BPM
    Thanks
    Swarup

  • No item exists at ... It may have been deleted or renamed by another user for new items, but older items work?

    I created a webpart page and added an SPD listformwebpart in display mode for a particular list.
    All day yerterday I called the page and passed it the ?ID= query string and it worked great. It still works great for the items I had created.
    This morning I added a workflow where I email the URL to the page with the ID dynamically on it. Any items I added today give me the error:
    No item exists at ... It may have been deleted or renamed by another user
    All items from yesterday work fine on that page with the exact url... ????
    I was demoing the solution and was completely at a loss to explain this.
    I checked and there is no Item security. I can pull up the suspect items using the native list Display page. I show up as the creator and last modifier My workflow is NOT making any changes to the list .. only sending a url to my page.
    Same URL with only the ID different..Some items work.. some don't.. Any explanation for this?
    UPDATE: I CREATED A BRAND NEW PAGE WITH NO CODE. JUST THE LISTFORMWEBPART AND THE PROBLEM PERSIST.
    ============================
    Thank You
    cyberpine.com

    Not sure if you've seen it already, but here's a step by step guide from Microsoft's help site on creating a custom form.
    http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint-designer-help/create-a-custom-list-form-HA010119111.aspx
    The location of the custom form is really irrelevant. As I said, you don't apply security to the forms. They're applied to the list/library level or at the individual items.
    Also, SharePoint 2007 doesn't have column/field level security. Even if you customize your form or use javascript to make certain fields not-editable, it doesn't necessarily mean that's secured. Someone experienced with SharePoint can easily get around it.
    Depending on your user base or sensitivity of your data, making individual fields not-editable may not be a big deal.
    Anyways, take a look at the following article from Laura Rogers. This is one way you can make the form so that only certain fileds are editable.
    http://www.sharepoint911.com/blogs/laura/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?List=daba3a3b-c338-41d8-bf52-cd897d000cf3&ID=3&Web=dbb90e85-b54c-49f4-8e97-6d8258116ca0
    Good luck...
    Pman
    http://www.pmansLab.com/

  • RBBP_OFFLINE_EVAL No e-mails exist for execution of work items

    Hi ,
    We are trying to implement SRM offline approval. The system is able to send the email to the approvers, but when they click on approve, the work item does not get updated.
    When i try to run report RBBP_OFFLINE_EVAL it says that No e-mails exist for execution of work items. No Work Item Found for Processing. What do i need to check to resolve this. If I approve thru SRM, it is working.
    Thanks,
    Jograd

    Hi
    refer related links too
    SRM : Offline approval process
    Offline approval not working?
    Check WF-BATCH user id has email ID?
    regards
    Muthu
    Edited by: muthuraman on Aug 18, 2008 8:00 AM

  • Workflow loop, return the work item to the inbox, instead of automatically executing the work item

    Hello all,
    Within a workflow I have a loop. Inside that a foreground step is executed. Then a condition step is executed to decide if the workflow should continue, stop, or return the work item to the inbox.
    This new workflow was modeled after an existing workflow that is doing just that. Unfortunately, this new workflow is not returning the work item to the inbox. Instead, it just keeps displaying the screen that is called by the function module that is called by the business object method that is executed when the foreground task runs.
    I've included a Word document with further detail in a number of screen prints. Hopefully this is something that will experience workflow developer may have seen before and know how to correct.
    Unfortunately I have done very little workflow development and don't have a clue what might be causing this problem.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Bruce
    I could not attach a Word file, so I added 3 jpg files.  I would have added another 3, but it seems that posts are limited to 3 files.

    Hi Bruce,
    As per your design, If you are approving or returning, the workflow loops back to the step "Approver - stat key approve".
    Suppose you are one of the approver for this step ""Approver - stat key approve" and if you click on approve or return, then it will try to create a new workitem for "Approver - stat key approve" step.
    As you are one of the approver again, the window opens immediately instead of reaching the inbox of all other approvers.
    Include a dummy activity step in the "approve & return" condition outcome.
    Active the workflow & refresh the buffer SWU_OBUF.
    After this, when you click on return it will not open the same screen again. Instead it will be reaching all the approvers' SAP inbox.
    Thanks,
    Karthikeyan

  • Account balance = 0 but open items exist in the accountu201D

    hi  gurus,
    while creating the g/ls by mistake i have checked the open item management which now has balances and the status shows its open which is not suppose to happen. well i cleared the balance and made it zero balance and when i go back to FS00 to remove the check and try to save it ,     
                               it says  "Account balance = 0 but open items exist in the accountu201D
    i tried to search for the solutions on the forum and figuered out an  answer which says OBA5 actually deals with solving the problem. but i am clueless as to how can i solve it with tcode OBA5...
    REGARDS
    sayeed

    Hi Sayeed
    If my understanding is correct, you want to remove the open item management check box in FS00
    All standard purpose its not possible
    But you can go to a program named RFSEPA02 and command the open item management portion in the program
    BEWARE - NOT AT ALL RECOMMENDED BY SAP
    The above solution is your going to create a Z program of the standard, now execute the program with the GL account you want to do the open item management check box
    Before doing this, please block the GL account for posting
    Hope this will help you
    We have done this in 4.7 & 5.0, hope the same will work for 6.0
    Warm Regards
    Bala

  • Migration of Work Items from one system to another

    Dear Experts,
    We are migrating an application from one system to other and it involves BI, Webdynpro, BSP and workflow. This is mainly a portal application which involves BI as the backend. While migrating the application with the existing data we also require to migrate the open Work items of the Users.
    Can anyone help us in migrating the Work Items or the possibilities of doing the same.
    Useful suggestions will be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Prabhakar M

    Hi All,
    Am opening this thread again.
    Using Transaction SWW_SARA I have Archived the Completed and Cancelled workitems in one Production system(For Ref, P1) and it got stored as a File in the Application Server.
    But while I tried to view the archived workitems via the same Transaction I can see only the header of the Workitem and not the detailed information of the same.
    Is this the only method to view the archived Workitem or any other way is available to view the detailed Information. Also is it possible to transfer the archived file to another Production system and view the workitems?
    Please help me in finding the solution for above scenario.
    Regards,
    Prabhakar

  • Work item forward when dead line reached

    Hi Every one,
    I got change request to deploy the dead line monitoring for the purchase requisition workflow.
    The workflow existing start with the agent determination step which will determines the approver and after that it has a custom user decision step( Dead line monitoring must be implemented for this task ) which will call the ME53N and if we say back it will give a pop-up with 3 options which are 'Approve' ,'Reject','Cancel'.The user will select one of the option and after that there is multiple decision step which have 3 branches will select one of the branch according to the user selected option and the flow continues so on.
    Business Requirement:
    If level 1  does not release requisition in one day, then it must go to Level 2.If level 2 does not release that requisition within three days then it must go to Level 3, escalation stops at level 3 and the work item must stay until unless level 3 make the action on the work item.
    The work item forward must be happen when escalation takes place not the notification.
    Please let me know the information aforesaid is not clear at any point.
    Regards,
    Rajesh
    Edited by: bhupathyraju rajasekhar on Jul 9, 2010 1:06 PM
    Edited by: bhupathyraju rajasekhar on Jul 9, 2010 1:23 PM

    You can do this in many ways. This is one of them:
    - Create a loop that goes around for the number of approval levels (so, 3-level approval means loop 3 times)
    - Inside the loop, create a 2-branch fork with only one mandatory branch to complete: one for approval and the other waiting for "expired" event
    - Set up modeled deadline monitoring for the approval step. Once the deadline is reached, you need to fire the "expired" event which will process the other fork branch.
    - After the expiration branch is executed, you can add any tasks to change the status, etc.
    Hope this helps,
    Abdullah

  • FI-SD Error FF805  No tax item exists for tax code R4 in a G/L account ite

    Dear, I have create IN ECC 6.0 a sales orden whit the following conditions
                                                                 CONDITION VALUE
    VKPO   Price Sales                0,00   EUR
    MWS     Sales Tax     4,000 %     0,00   EUR
    ZGGM    recharges                 100,00   EUR
    I have creata a billing document but when I execute the vf02 transaction for Release to Accountg apper the following error message
         Message no. FF805
    Diagnosis
         No tax item exists for tax code R4 in a G/L account item. A possible
         cause is an incorrect transfer of parameters by the application to the
         Accounting interface.
    The pricing procedure is
    1     0     VKP0 2     2   5     0                                                                  6
    10     0     MWST  Sales Tax     S1016
    30     0                              2     4
    40     0     ZGGM30     5     5       
    This process work correctly in 4.5b version but not work in ECC 6.0
    I have cheking the note 112609 and other notes but work
    thanks

    Hi,
    Error message FF805 is usually due to configuration issues.
    Tax conditions, especially the main ones UTXJ or MWST can not have a condition base value that is 0. If you are using UTXJ, the condition needs to be statistical and 100%. This condition controls how all the remaining tax conditions are calculated; and how the tax codes are determined.
    Another cause of the error message is due to the reference steps in the pricing procedure. If the tax condition references a line that is not calculated in your document, the base value is 0 and you get the error. These reference steps also control how the tax codes are distributed. If you have conditions that are active and do not have a tax code, they are not within the reference for the tax condition, and you will get this error message. You must also have an active price for the tax condition to copy to when the billing document is released to accounting.
    Please also checknotes 327373, 400766, 385127..
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • TFS 2010 Team Web Access Work Items not loading dropdowns and not saving

    Some of our users have lost their ability to add new work items. When they select New -> Bug the WorkItemEdit page opens, but none of the dropdowns load and required fields are no longer highlighted. When they click save it acts like
    it refreshes, but actually nothing is saved and work item numbers are not assigned. No error message is displayed. This also occurs when they try to edit existing work items. We have checked permissions and these have not changed. We have cleared cache
    and rebooted the server and local laptops. Is there anywhere else we can check to see what is going on? Anyone else have this issue before? It seems like we are loosing another person's capabilities every day.

    Thank you for your help. We have SP1 scheduled for install Monday morning. However, we have been running a lot of tests. We are testing mainly in Chrome and IE 9 browsers.
    I was able to get 2 users back up and working. Not sure what fixed them, but I had them log into the server and test there. Accessing the web portal on the server worked for them and when they went back to their laptops their full capabilities
    were working there again. I have since removed their rdp access to the server and the capabilities are still working correctly on their laptops.
    However, I have a 3rd user that I had log into the server and updating and creating new work items did not work for him. This is the error he receives when opening a work item. This user did try testing in Mozilla one day this week.
    Webpage error details
    User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)
    Timestamp: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:23:43 UTC
    Message: 'undefined' is null or not an object
    Line: 459
    Char: 9
    Code: 0
    URI: http: //synqtfs2:8080/tfs/web/ScriptResource.axd?d=FYYkafvHmJyg7KmGDtGowHNi60MyDp_sPy-aHe4FCjNjVsni06fZnOIXJiFxZpzcMt92dwoABVR433z1HUUKi-9aLOEO651UC75HFjmS7hvUIPs_HbO_gMhEIFzDLJCRn3-zV0_qstaTszOYGGcLVSqLpmbOMg9VwaYgOa0o__3xszzq_OYpQwOuLyDFEZY_2zbcjg2&t=ffffffffe8aa60f2
    Message: 'this.m_scrollCell.style' is null or not an object
    Line: 513
    Char: 9
    Code: 0
    URI: http://synqtfs2:8080/tfs/web/ScriptResource.axd?d=FYYkafvHmJyg7KmGDtGowHNi60MyDp_sPy-aHe4FCjNjVsni06fZnOIXJiFxZpzcMt92dwoABVR433z1HUUKi-9aLOEO651UC75HFjmS7hvUIPs_HbO_gMhEIFzDLJCRn3-zV0_qstaTszOYGGcLVSqLpmbOMg9VwaYgOa0o__3xszzq_OYpQwOuLyDFEZY_2zbcjg2&t=ffffffffe8aa60f2

  • Resctriction while displaying work items in sourcing cockpit..

    Dear all SRM gurus,
    We are using SRM 5.0 extended classic scenario.
    We are having a requirement to restrict the work items in sourcing cockpit based on the purchaser user id, i mean particular SC's should be visible to particular users only..
    Is there any BAdI or any other procedures to restrict the display.
    Thanks in advance,
    Chandra Sekhar.

    Hi,
    You can easily do this by implementing the badi "BBP_WF_LIST" for the object type SOCO.
    Here is the documetation of the BADI -
    BBP_WF_LIST
    Short Text
    Display Worklists and Search Results Lists
    With the Business Add-In BBP_WF_LIST , you can tailor the
    display of worklists and search results lists for purchase order documents (and Sourcing applications) in SRM Server according to your own criteria.
    Standard settings
    The following methods are available:
    BBP_WF_LIST for purchasing documents
    <b>BBP_WF_LIST_SOCO for the Sourcing application</b>
    In the standard version, the following differences exist between the display of worklists and search results lists:
    Normal employees see only their own requirements and documents
    The purchaser's worklist in Sourcing and in the application for processing purchase orders is dependent on assignment to an organizational unit.
    The goods recipient and invoicing party can find all purchase orders, confirmations, and invoices.
    As standard, the system sorts the purchasing documents in ascending order by the last date of processing.
    To distinguish between the worklists and search results lists of the SRM Server applications, the BAdI is implemented dependent on the following filters:
    BUS2201
    Filter value for the worklist in purchase order processing in SAP Enterprise Buyer
    BUS2203
    Filter value for the worklist in confirmation processing in SAP Enterprise Buyer
    BUS2205
    Filter value for the search results list in invoice processing in SAP Enterprise Buyer
    BUS2121
    Filter value for the worklist in shopping cart status check in SAP Enterprise Buyer
    BUS2200
    Filter value for the search results list in bid invitation processing in SAP Bidding Engine
    BUS2202
    Filter value for the search results list in bid processing in SAP Bidding Engine
    BUS2000113
    Filter value for the search results list in contract processing in SAP Enterprise Buyer
    Activities
    Implement and activate the BAdI if you wish to adapt worklists and search results lists.
    Note that the filter value Object type (field OBJECT_TYPE) determines for which application the BAdI implementation is active.
    Example
    Using the BadI BBP_WF_LIST you can sort the worklist by document number, for example, or remove documents belonging to a particular user from the worklist.
    The implementation of the BadI using Business object type BUS2205 allows you to change the list of invoices and the purchase orders associated with these invoices independently of one another. For example, you could sort the purchase orders by purchase order number and the invoices by the name of the user who created them.
    You can exclude bid invitations from a certain product category, for example, from the purchaser's search results list in SAP Bidding Engine.
    You can exclude contracts from a certain purchasing organization or purchasing group, for example, from the purchaser's search results list in SAP Enterprise Buyer.
    Further notes
    If the BadI is used for confirmations and purchase orders, it always accesses the list of the actual document and its purchase orders.
    The purchaser's worklist contains only requirements that, according to Customizing, are to be processed in the Sourcing application. See the IMG activity Define Sourcing for Product Categories.
    Sample code in foll threads:
    Filtering content in the SRM confirmation worklist
    Re: Purchaser worklist
    BR,
    Disha.
    <b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

  • Obsolete and batch users can receive work items

    Dear Experts,
    Currently, we have found a problem that obsolete and batch users can receive work items by manual forwarding from someone. The roles and responsibilities of obsolete users were removed and users have been locked. For Batchuser, it's only created for some certain job with limited roles.
    Could you help advise if this's a behavior of workflow or it's from some authorization problem? We have concern for business impact since no one is really handling work items and important messages are out of sight.
    Thank you very much in advance.
    Regards, Kae

    Hello,
    This is standard behaviour. It is even possible to send work items to users who do not yet exist (e.g. someone who is due to join the company).
    The easiest way to workaround is to set up a substitution for any users that get locked and for background users. Personal substitutes can be maintained directly in table HRUS_D2, you could possibly write your own maintenance transaction for this if it is to be an ongoing issue.
    Hope that helps,
    Mike
    Message was edited by:
            Mike Pokraka

  • Error in WEB IC FOR WORK ITEM "Choose an assignment reason"

    We are getting an error in WEB IC where user is trying to resubmit the work item by giving the resubmission date, re submission reason , Status, and sub status
    but when users are trying to save  it they are getting an error i.e. "Choose an assignment reason" and they are not able to complete the process
    I know there is config for maintaining "Define Reasons for Assignment of Work Items" in SPRO under work items, but this config is not applicable since we are not assigning work item to a new unit and/or a new collection specialist, or removing any assignment.  we are just re submitting the work items
    Any help on this will be highly appreciated.

    Hi,
    Just a thought - on a couple of my previous projects we had some custom CRM Fron-end validation between Work Item Sub Status and either re-assignment reason and/or Closing result code.
    Perhaps check with your Development support team to ensure no such cross-validation exists upon saving.
    Regards,
    Ivor Martin

  • Need 2 links in an Work item???

    Hi Experts,
    I am having a requirement as i need to display the 2 Links which should route to a T-Code via a work item... I can display the 1 link for a transaction VA03 based on the Display method in a business object and in the same work item i need to give a link to display the VC01N transaction which is related to another business object... So please guide me how can i display 2 Links in an Work item for 2 different transactions...
    Thanks,
    Srikag

    Hello,
    The workitem will display a link for the default method of every BOR in the workflow (besides the workflow BOR).
    So if you want a link to transaction x, make a BOR and make x the default method of that BOR and instantiate that BOR in the workflow.
    Usually the BOR already exists; you'll just have to instantiate it with a relevant value in the workflow and possibly change the default method.
    regards
    Rick Bakker
    hanabi technology

  • Need to call sap transaction when the work item got rejected.

    Hi all,
    I need to call the ME22n transaction once i reject the Work item. Once i press the rejection button on the work item it should direct to the sap transaction. how can i make this functionality in the decision task. Do i need to implement an ext for this.
    Thanks.
    Neslin.

    You simply create a task for executing the SAP transaction (business object TSTC)
    you use this task as a dialog step at the rejected outcome of the user decision with the same agent as the user decision and in the details of the workflow step you tick the advance with dialog box.
    And... you're done.
    Kind regards, Rob Dielemans
    Edit: Instead of using BO TSTC it would be better to check the BO normally related to Me22n and see if a dialog maintain method exists
    Edited by: Rob Dielemans on Jul 16, 2009 9:55 AM

Maybe you are looking for