Nvidia Quadro FX380 Card for HP Elitedesk 800 G1 TowerPC

Nvidia Quadro FX380  Card for HP Elitedesk 800 G1 TowerPC  is not working with either black or white pci slot ... BIOS option for integrated video is greyed out....
When i changed the slot security in BIOS to disable all PCI , then only i can see the the PC Post & see the display from the integrated card but still doesn't detect the FX380.
Also UEFI & Safe boot options are disabled in BIOS... Please help ... 

Hi,
You might get better assistance on the HP Enterprise Business Forum since you have a business class PC.
HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

Similar Messages

  • Is Apple 27in Cinema display compatible with NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 for Mac?

    Can anyone tell me whether the new Apple 27inch Cinema display will work with the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 for Mac? I will use this on a MacPro with 2.66GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon “Westmere” and CS5 (Adobe recommends the NVIDIA). It seems incredible that it doesn't for whatever reason.
    Thanks
    James

    You will need a dual-link DVI to Mini DisplayPort converter.
    <http://www.atlona.com/Atlona-Dual-Link-DVI-to-Mini-DisplayPort-Converter-USB-Po wered.html>

  • Quadro video cards (for Windows)...

    Is it possible to utilize a Windows version of the nVidia Quadro series video cards in a 2009 MacPro?
    I would be using it in the B/C side of course; but was curious if this is even do-able?
    Or are there too many little "gotchas" to even bother with this?

    Hi Shaluda, (cool name)
    This is a thread you may have missed today.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2176706
    Yes, just drop Local338 an email and I bet they get back to you within the next day. The guys there just seem to work, work, work. They are very knowledgeable in this area and will give you good advice whether you buy from them or not. Wai is my go-to-guy there, we've emailed each other often. They've supplied me with many cards, all top notch for good prices.
    The thing is someone has to create, I believe, the Mac ROM, to go on the card. And then someone has to put it on a Windows machine and put more info on the card. This isn't normally done by the people selling the card, except the last part. As I said, I believe this is what happens. I believe this whole process is what amounts to "flashing".
    Good luck, let us know how things turn out.
    Steve

  • I installed a NVIDIA QUADRO K2000 card and downloaded the most current drivers. AE does not accept

    Can anyone offer a solution for this? I installed a NVIDIA QUADRO K2000 graphics card. I downloaded the latest drivers for the card. AE reports that this GPU is incompatible.  This is one of recommended listed cards for CS6. Any suggestions?

    > This is one of recommended listed cards for CS6.
    Where did you get that information? That card is not on this list:
    http://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects/tech-specs.html
    What is the exact message that you're referring to when you say that After Effects "reports that this GPU is incompatible"? Is it just saying that it won't use this GPU for the CUDA acceleration of the ray-traced 3D renderer? If so, the only thing that you'd be missing is GPU acceleration of one feature.
    See this page for details of how the GPU is used in After Effects:
    http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2012/05/gpu-cuda-opengl-features-in-after-effects-cs6. html

  • Caution, nVIDIA Quadro FX cards may not support DirextX 11

    Anyone thinking or acquiring any of these cards be careful if DirectX 11 is something you will need in the future.
    During September when researching the Quadro FX cards one of my criteria was that it supports DirectX 11.
    At that time their latest driver version indicated it does support DirectX 11.  Only recently when running a program that requires it did I find out the card does not support DirectX 11  !
    So now I've got to look at something else to replace this card.  Anyone here want it?
    Not so cheerful,
    Michael

    The card in question is the Quadro FX 3800.
    However, my colleague has the Quadro FX 4800 and will run into the same problem.
    Regarding running the DirectX update from Microsoft, the answer is yes I did.
    The NVIDA Customer Care representative's response was as follows (I really wish one could copy and paste this):
    "I apologize for the inconvenience.  I must add though that the 259.81 Driver Package is generic to a lot of devices.  The idea behind this is to streamline the process of driver packaging.  Whilst the 259.81 drivers support DX 11 it requires a card to support DX 11 to work successfully."
    Checking NVIDIA's product lineup this means only the 5000 series and up support DirectX 11.
    What disturbes me, that there is no mention in the driver's web site description indicating this card is excluded.  To the contrary it is listed as being included!
    As well the fact that this "customer care" representative alludes to my incompitence in not checking the specifications...
    Cheers
    Michael

  • Video sync problem with nvidia quadro fx cards, edge blending on.

    when I start edge blending feature of my nvidia quadro fx 3500 driver on 2 projectors, quicktime goes out of synchronization between audio and display. it's not directly related with framerate cuz my own opengl application with quicktime sdk, renders with 300+ fps succesfully but still the video is out of sync...

    Hi there, welcome to forum.
    "*Update*
    I have a feeling that my PSU might be causing the low performance, seeing that the Quadro requires two power connectors to attach to it: (http://www.pny.com/support/quadro/install/FX4000AdditionalPowerRequirements.pdf)
    Here is my PSU:
    http://www.xpcgear.com/500wseepsubl.html
    I do not know much about PSU's, so any input is greatly appreciated.  Thanks."
    your PSU is good one and should be powerfull enough.
    Output    +3.3V@28A, +5V@30A, +12V@34A, [email protected], [email protected], +5VSB@2A
    can't be power related, since at 1st your PSU must be enough, 2nd same issue happend with your old mx 440 VGA. card malfunction are dismissed as possibility as well since its work fine in another machine.
    think its drivers mess. ATI drivers(or part of them) still exist, guess is not completely removed. same symptoms happend many times when switching between Ati to NV, lagging 2D scrolling lag and etc, caused by ATI Smart (part of ATI Drivers) sometimes remain(survive after driver cleaner).
    suggest you a new clean fresh OS installation. like Nv support already directed. also ensure in BIOS, in "Integrated Peripherals", "Init Display First" are configured to AGP.
    let we know how its going, if problem persist we a ready with a tips to resolve your issue.

  • NVidia Quadro 4500 for mac and pc question

    I am thinking of purchasing a new Mac Pro 3.0GHz Quad-Core desktop with the nVidia Quadro 4500 graphics card. I want to run Solidworks on Windows XP SP2 and also be able to boot into Mac OS X. I have done hours of research trying to make sure it will work but can't seem to find any posts that suggest my system will work as I intend.
    I have found out that the nVidia Quadro 4500 needs to configured for the mac (firmware) and that you just can't buy one from eBay and install it. There are PC versions and Mac versions. Also, flashing it to work with a mac is very difficult and may damage the card if you get it wrong. Not something I want to do.
    So, my question is: If I buy this Mac Pro from Apple with the nVidia Quadro 4500 card already installed, will I have any problems with it working on the window side of things when I boot into Windows XP? Does anyone have the setup that I am talking about and also running SolidWorks on the Windows side?
    Thanks in advance for any help you can give me.
    Yee Ha!

    Hi,
    Mac OS X Leopard has Boot Camp included with the software. I have read online (Apple site amongst others) the BootCamp bundled with Leopard has all the drivers for Windows included, so you no longer need to create a disc with the drivers needed for Windows (as you did under the BootCamp beta version).
    That being the case, Leopard should have the required drivers for your Quadro FX 4500 to function under Windows.
    See here for details:
    http://www.apple.com/uk/macosx/features/bootcamp.html
    Hope this helps

  • Support for new Nvidia Quadro gpu?

    When support for new Nvidia Quadro gpu? For example Nvida Quadro K2200 and K4200
    Thk

    What do you mean when you say "support"? All of After Effects OpenGL features already work on those cards.
    The only thing that isn't supported on those cards is GPU acceleration of the ray-traced 3D renderer, which is an obsolete and almost entirely irrelevant feature. No more GPUs will ever be added to the list of cards supported for that feature.
    Details:
    GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) features in After Effects

  • Need a new video card for 2008 pro

    hi to all,
    i have a mac pro early 2008
    with next parts
    2*2,8 ghz quad core
    10gb 800 mhz ddr2
    ati radeon hd 2600 xt 256mb
    and osx 10.8.4
    i like to upgrade this so that i can use flight game x-plane
    the recommend system specifications are
    3ghz(multi core)
    4gb ram
    a directx 11 video card with 1 gb onboard,dedicated vram
    i realy don't know what they mean with this,so what's the best video card that i can use in this system
    a good(best) card without problems
    i would stay with ati radeon bcse at this moment no problems with them
    thanks for your help
    marc

    New Nvidia Quadro/GeForce Drivers for OS X 10.8.5 (12F45) + CUDA Update
    Monday's news had a report from a Mac Pro owner that the (Sept. 19th) Nvidia Driver Update for OS X 10.8.5 (12F37) were broken by the OS X 10.8.5 Supplemental Update (12F45). Wednesday he sent a FYI on another driver update. (Popup from the previous install's web check I assume.)
    "New Nvidia driver for 10.8.5 Supplemental restores functionality
    Recently I send you a mail, describing a problem with Nvidia drivers (for build 12F37) after updating to the latest supplemental OS update (12F45).
       Yesterday, a friendly window popped up, asking me to download a new Nvidia Geforce driver. After finishing, I can use the NVidia driver again within 10.8.5. (12F45)
    Just for completion.
    Kind regards, Jörg"
    Thanks Jörg. After getting his mail I checked the Nvidia drivers download page again and there is now a new update available (as well as a later Cuda version). See Quadro & GeForce Mac OS X (12F45) Driver Release 313.01.03f02 which also refers to a later CUDA driver - v5.5.25. (Driver page's Additional Info tabs have install info.) '
    GTX from EVGA is a 680, but some do go for a PC version 670.

  • T61 will not boot with nvidia quadro 140m driver

    Hi all,
    A couple of weeks ago, after allowing MS update to install some FTDI driver updates, my system will not boot up and hangs shortly after the initial vista loading screen. The screen goes black with some HD activity and eventually reboots. After trying a couple of restore points with no luck, I started to remove the latest driver updates and other software to my system again with no luck. 
    If I uninstall the nvidia driver and use the Standard VGA driver, it will boot and come up properly. I've done a bunch of web searches and searches on this site and can't find my exact circumstances. Its hard to believe that it could be a  hardware issue since it started after a software update, but since it hasn't been a problem for anyone else, I'm just not sure at this point.
    I've tried earlier versions of the nvidia driver, removing other drivers and services trying to find a coincidence, but nothing seems to work. I'm kind of at a loss at this point. Does anyone have some suggestions?
    Thanks in advance,
    Dave

    More info on my system:
    OS Name    Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Business
    Version    6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001
    System Model    6459CTO
    System Type    x64-based PC
    Processor    Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     T8300  @ 2.40GHz, 2401 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s)
    BIOS Version/Date    LENOVO 7LETC5WW (2.25 ), 11/14/2008
    SMBIOS Version    2.4
    Installed Physical Memory (RAM)    4.00 GB
    Also, does anyone know if using the Standard VGA Display driver without problems on this system means that the video card hardware is working? In other words, I'm trying to rule out a hardware problem with my nvidia quadro 140m card, so if the system works fine with the standard vga driver, would that mean the hardware on the card is ok? 
    Thanks,
    Dave

  • Nvidia Quadro 4000 not working properly

    Hi all,
    I am really hoping that some one can help me with a very frustrating issue with my new Mac Pro and Nvidia Quadro 4000 card.
    I purchased my Mac Pro from an Apple store and added the Quadro 4000, I need that card as it is supported by Adobe Premiere CS5 to enable the GPU acceleration. The reason I went to the store to buy instead of online was to get advice about the card as I have not used a Mac for 5 years now. I was told that they are not familiar with the card, but put it in and run alongside the ATI card.
    When it arrived I put it all together, except for the Quadro 4000, and it all worked perfectly. I have 2 x 27” Cinema Displays attached. I installed production studio CS5 and then extremely carefully added the Quadro card.
    Without going on about all the drama with it not working with the ATI card and then removing that and installing only the Quadro, it is not doing what I bought it to do. Adobe is not recognising the device, I have updated to version 5.0.3 of Premiere Pro, which supports this card.
    I think I know what the problem is, but I have no idea how to resolve it. I put the Quadro in and then installed the drivers. My research says this is wrong (there were no instructions in the box and the read me file on the disc just said I need a specific cuda driver), so I removed it, put the ATI in and hunted down all the Cuda (Quadro stuff) files, deleted them, reinstalled drivers and reinstalled the card. No change, it drives one display and Premiere still cant see it.
    I have tried to find answers on the internet, Apple are not very helpful as it was a third party item they have no training on (although purchased from Apple).
    The only thing I have read is it may need to be on OS 10.6.5, I updated to 10.6.6 and/or because I installed the card before drivers. I have read that I need to sort out ‘Permissions’ but can’t find out how.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated, I really need to get this thing working as I have a very expensive computer I can not use.
    Thanks
    Phil
    Oh, one other thing, it is supposed to run two displays, one via display port and the other via DVI, but I am having no joy here either, and there seems to be no DVI male to MDP female adapter????

    You are making it (sounds like to me) harder than it is.
    You do not mention which ATI card, but you should use both side by side unless you have the 5870 which is using the two pci 6-pin power connectors on it.
    With Mac OS people generally never need to delete drivers by hand.
    ATI 57x0 and Quadro work better together. Or even ATI 4870 and GTX 285 in the past. Use the ATI for monitors and Quadro for CUDA and Mercury.
    FYI for Quadro 4000 Mac Owners upgrading to 10.6.6:
    Included in today's 10.6.6 related apple docs is one noting new Quadro 4000 owners need to Reinstall the Nvidia Quadro driver update after updating to 10.6.6.
    To save you a lot of clicks (the doc links to the nvidia product page) - here's the page with the current (as of this AM) Quadro OS X 10.6.5 Driver page which still shows the 11/16/2010 driver date/v256.01.00f03. But the file I downloaded this morning is named "Retail_256.01.00f03v5.dmg" (28.9MB) - dated Dec 17th. The file I downloaded back in mid-Nov does not have the "V5" in the filename and is larger (37.3MB). I don't own this card and not dug into the pkg to see what changed (i.e. did they remove the extra kexts for other models perhaps?) but just a FYI.
    http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/archives/jan11/010611.html#quadro4000
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4499
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-macosx-256.01.00f03-driver.html
    Reinstall the 10.6.6 combo update manually is sometimes a good idea (some of us use only combo updates when it comes time to update OS X).
    Here: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1349

  • Best PCI-X / PCI video card for Solaris 10?

    I don't mean "best" in the "latest, greatest, fastest" sense, I mean best to denote visual properties and rendering, support, basically. My current machine (Compaq SR5250NX) has a PCI bus ATI Radeon 9250 (256MB RAM) that XSun detects and uses as an ATI 9200 Pro AGP. There are all sorts of performance/visual issues...when I minimize a window, it takes a second or two (literally) to minimize and you can watch it "draw down." Or sometimes when I minimize a window, it minimizes from the top down, and the desktop is redrawn vertically, very slowly. (So you can watch the window disappear top down.) This is *extremely frustrating and makes the entire desktop experience unpleasant.  This is unfortunate because I really like JDS. 
    So, which card has the best Solaris 10 (XSun) support? It can be either PCI or PCI-X. All I do is write text documents, program, and other general tasks. No graphics work or anything of that sort. I don't care if it's old and I have to get it used...it just has to have awesome support and enough power to handle JDS and normal apps (Sun Studio, SO 8, FF3, etc). I'm on a bit of a budget, so if it's possible to get this card for around $100..that'd be great.
    *Yes, I've read the HCL, and I know which cards are on there as supported, but it doesn't say anything about which card has the best support. 
    Thanks,
    ~Slow
    Edited by: SlowToady on Nov 18, 2008 6:43 PM
    reason: typo
    Edited by: SlowToady on Nov 18, 2008 6:44 PM

    Although I prefer ATI for personal use on other OSes, my last two Solaris workstations have had Nvidia Quadro video cards in them, and they've both worked very well. My previous workstation (A Sun w2100z that died a couple months ago) had a Quadro NVS 280, my new workstation has a Quadro Fx 1700, which performs extremely well even at 1920 x 1280. The Fx 1700 isn't what you would
    call cheap, though.
    You might want to try pick up a used Quadro NVS (at least something in the 2xx series), or one of the lower models in the Quadro Fx series.
    Tim
    PS: I'm going to be asking nearly an indentical question to this one in a minute, except about audio cards rather than video. :-|

  • PPro CS5 not talking to NVidia Quadro 4000...

    Apologies in advance if this has been covered a million times on here (and feel free to point me to a thread), but...I have a new Mac setup, Adobe PPro CS5, and the NVidia Quadro 4000 card with MPE/Cuda. And PPro is not using the GPU.
    I do have the latest drivers (for the card and for CUDA). The card was installed a month ago and I grabbed the drivers at that time.
    Recently I worked on a simple 7-minute non-HD video, with no effects and minimal editing...and the publish time was 7 minutes or so.
    I was expecting faster. And while it was publishing, my computer's CPU gauge said it was running at around 90%. I made sure the PPro project setting pointed towards the card GPU.Obviously the MPE and/or CUDA is not kicking in.
    I have spoken to PNY (where I bought the Nvidia card) and they said if I have the latest drivers and could actually see something on my screens, then the card is working and...you know...it must be a problem with the PPro aoftware.
    Oh, the Mac is a 2010 model, 8-core with a ton of RAM on it.
    Thoughts?
    John

    You are not understanding how the MPE engine works. The MPE engine does not lower the overall load of the CPU as far as usage. It lowers the instructions ie the types of code/threads it has to handle in a given time period. The CPU has to handle all  of the Decoding/encoding of the codecs/ie material that you are using. It will also have to process any non accelerated effects. It also handles all memory management and interrupts that is required by the applications, machine code, and hardware. The GPU handles the scaling, interpolation, and some of the effects besides drawing and GUID code. The CPU has to process the Decode then cache the material to ram so it can cache over to the GPU card Ram for CUDA processing. Once threading is done via the GPU then it caches back to the system ram for the CPU to final encode and adjust further frame data for effects. All of this means the entire pipeline happens faster the more load the CPU can handle focused on specific functions and at what GHz those process through the system during a given time. So basically the MPE allows the system to process more work in a given time period simultaneously essentially. So the higher the load on your CPU the faster your entire workflow will process. In simple terms, this means you want the highest CPU load you can get because that means the GPU, system ram, disks, or board throughput is not slowing anything down. Your at 62%. That means your system somewhere in the pipeline is not allowing the cpu to run at max performance in that given time period. I hope that clarify's what you are seeing and why.
    And yes, OS/Application threading and caching is also included in not allowing the CPU to run at max capacity.
    Eric
    ADK

  • NVidia Quadro 4000 First Impressions

    I've seen some questions and some discussion regarding the nVidia Quadro 4000 card. Mine arrived yesterday, I figured I would share my initial experiences with it to help give others guidance so they can make the best decisions for their own needs.
    First off, if your primary interest (or a significant interest) is playing games, than a Quadro card is not for you. nVidia's high end cards are fine-tuned on both a hardware and software (driver) level in the needs of pro apps and manipulating very large data sets. It happens at the expense of some performance stats that matter to gamers. Quadro cards aren't designed to get you a higher fps in your favorite shooter, they're designed to get you better performance with ray-tracing, real-time 3D environments, and scientific use. I'll leave you to surf to nVidia's web site for more marketing speak on that. In my initial tests, I found that to be completely true. I don't do much gaming, but the couple games I tested performed no faster than the GTX-285 I had in the machine before.
    Attempting to run some more tests, I found that RealTech VR's OpenGL extensions viewer (which has some decidedly gamer-centric benchmarks) showed little to no improvement over the GTX-285 (as expected).
    Running a few test renders in Cinema 4D, I found only about a 5-7% increase in performance. That might be due to immature drivers, but it may also be due to C4D renders being more about CPU mucle (Maxon doesn't have any specific CUDA-support or acceleration). What I did notice was that moving/camming around in the app was much improved. I couldn't say if that had to do with an extra gigabyte of vram, or if it was some kind of 'Fermi' magic (Fermi's the name of this generation chip technology from nVidia).
    I have not yet gotten the chance to give Adobe CS5 (and specifically Premiere Pro and After Effects) a serious workout, though just playing around I noticed that the Quadro card had much more capacity for handling multiple layers of video in real time (I threw a dozen videos onto a main track in varying sizes of 'picture-in-picture' display, and arbitrarily adjusted the speed of some and color corrected others). It handled everything I could throw at it without appearing to break into a sweat, and I haven't yet had time to give it a proper performance test.
    Being an early adopter, I have the expectation that on initial release there will be kinks and hiccups, and that as the drivers mature the performance will improve dramatically. Based on discussions with colleagues and what I've seen in reviews, this has been the case with both the GTX-285 and the Quadro FX 4800 card, and probably was also the case on older nVidia cards as well. The Quadro 4000 met those expectations - it feels like this is still a work in progress. The drivers (version 256.01.00f03) are stable (no crashes, no kernel panics, no horrible situations to speak of), but based on my early results I'd guess that they're not optimized for speed, either. On the Windows side, nVidia has driver version 259 available as a 'certified' release, and a higher performance version 260 available, and performance under Windows 7 Professional (64-bit) seems better. To be fair, the card's been on the market for PC's since late July, those drivers are more mature.
    I still need to give the card a serious workout with Adobe CS5, but so far things look promising. Anecdotally, I've also noticed that system performance is greatly improved when I'm doing lots of multi-tasking. I often have several different apps running at once, and between the new technology and the additional video memory (my old card had 1GB, this has 2GB), I find I can juggle 20+ apps and dozens of Safari windows/tabs running without the Mac Pro batting an eyelash. That's hard to quantify in a specific benchmark, but it's very welcome considering the way I tend to work.
    As the drivers improve, and as my own workflow evolves to make more use of larger datasets and more complex 3D scenes, I see the Quadro 4000 really starting to shine. Heavy-duty CUDA users may be happy to know that this card only requires a single additional power connection, which means that you can install two of these cards into a single Mac Pro (for a total of 512 CUDA cores). If you're doing big scientific work or working with CUDA-supported ray tracing (or other plugins), or doing extremely elaborate things with RED camera footage, that may likely be a game-changer for you. For me, it'll likely be quite some time before I outgrow what this card can do.

    As I'd mentioned in another thread, the card began shipping last week. I expect that it will take a couple months before places like Apple and Amazon to dig through the large number of backorders they have (I don't think this card is produced in mass quantity, even on the PC side).
    My system setup is a Mac Pro 8x2.26GHz, 32GB RAM, 8TB HD storage, nVidia Quadro 4000 2GB driving the primary display, and nVidia GT120 driving a secondary display. I'm considering getting third party power supply unit that sits in the second optical drive bay, and would plug into the Mac Pro's power supply, and then provide additional power supply connectors that would allow me to plug in my GTX-285 as a secondary graphics card (since it uses 2 connectors, and the Mac Pro only has 2 total).
    Even when my machine was using a GTX-285 and the GT-120, I could see a difference in performance when dragging an application window (particularly if it's a 3D app) from main display to the secondary (the GT-120 is a significantly lower power card, with only 32 CUDA cores and 512MB video memory). With the Quadro driving my primary display the difference is much more noticeable now.
    From what I understand, there are some technical issues with using ATI and nVidia GPU's in the same machine, so attempting to use with a 5770 may not work. But if you were able to use them together, it would make more sense to have the Quadro card driving your primary display, since it's likely going to perform as well or better than any other card you might be able to pair it with.
    I've already given some thought to a second Quadro card down the road. As the drivers mature, and the apps I use evolve to make better use of CUDA and OpenCL, and my own workflow and skills improve to the point where I'm doing more 3D modeling/rendering (and stuff like ray-tracing), then having 2 of these cards in a single machine could really come in handy. Today it appears that all those CUDA cores and VRAM are serving to help make the apps faster and more responsive at design time, but rendering is still very CPU-centric. But tomorrow those apps will hopefully be able to tap into the GPU to help improve render times.

  • Missing GPU Acceleration With NVIDIA Quadro 4000

    Hi -
    I have a PC running Windows 7 with an NVIDIA Quadro 4000 card and 16GB of RAM. I have both Premiere Pro CS6 v6.0.5 and Premiere Pro CC v7.2.2 (just installed).
    When I create a new project in CC, my only option under Video Rendering and Playback is Mercury Playback Engine Software Only. However, when I open a project in CS6, I get that option and also Mercury Playback Engine GPU Accelerated (CUDA).
    Any thoughts on why the GPU option would not be available to me in CC?
    Ed

    Hi Mesmer3001,
    I will suggest you to do a clean uninstall of all NVidia drivers and then re-install the latest one from the NVidia website. So, please follow the steps mentioned below.
    Go to Device manager, right click on the graphivs card and select update driver software.
    Select Browse my computer for driver software option.
    Then on next screen choose Let me pick from a list option
    Choose standard VGA graphics adapter which will choose VGA mode for your machine.
    Then go to Control Panel and uninstall all the NVidia drivers. Restart the machine once it is done. Then go to the below link and re-install the Drivers again.
    Hope it helps and please update if you need further assistance.
    http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us
    Regards,
    Vinay

Maybe you are looking for