Nvidia Quadro 4000 not working properly

Hi all,
I am really hoping that some one can help me with a very frustrating issue with my new Mac Pro and Nvidia Quadro 4000 card.
I purchased my Mac Pro from an Apple store and added the Quadro 4000, I need that card as it is supported by Adobe Premiere CS5 to enable the GPU acceleration. The reason I went to the store to buy instead of online was to get advice about the card as I have not used a Mac for 5 years now. I was told that they are not familiar with the card, but put it in and run alongside the ATI card.
When it arrived I put it all together, except for the Quadro 4000, and it all worked perfectly. I have 2 x 27” Cinema Displays attached. I installed production studio CS5 and then extremely carefully added the Quadro card.
Without going on about all the drama with it not working with the ATI card and then removing that and installing only the Quadro, it is not doing what I bought it to do. Adobe is not recognising the device, I have updated to version 5.0.3 of Premiere Pro, which supports this card.
I think I know what the problem is, but I have no idea how to resolve it. I put the Quadro in and then installed the drivers. My research says this is wrong (there were no instructions in the box and the read me file on the disc just said I need a specific cuda driver), so I removed it, put the ATI in and hunted down all the Cuda (Quadro stuff) files, deleted them, reinstalled drivers and reinstalled the card. No change, it drives one display and Premiere still cant see it.
I have tried to find answers on the internet, Apple are not very helpful as it was a third party item they have no training on (although purchased from Apple).
The only thing I have read is it may need to be on OS 10.6.5, I updated to 10.6.6 and/or because I installed the card before drivers. I have read that I need to sort out ‘Permissions’ but can’t find out how.
Any help would be greatly appreciated, I really need to get this thing working as I have a very expensive computer I can not use.
Thanks
Phil
Oh, one other thing, it is supposed to run two displays, one via display port and the other via DVI, but I am having no joy here either, and there seems to be no DVI male to MDP female adapter????

You are making it (sounds like to me) harder than it is.
You do not mention which ATI card, but you should use both side by side unless you have the 5870 which is using the two pci 6-pin power connectors on it.
With Mac OS people generally never need to delete drivers by hand.
ATI 57x0 and Quadro work better together. Or even ATI 4870 and GTX 285 in the past. Use the ATI for monitors and Quadro for CUDA and Mercury.
FYI for Quadro 4000 Mac Owners upgrading to 10.6.6:
Included in today's 10.6.6 related apple docs is one noting new Quadro 4000 owners need to Reinstall the Nvidia Quadro driver update after updating to 10.6.6.
To save you a lot of clicks (the doc links to the nvidia product page) - here's the page with the current (as of this AM) Quadro OS X 10.6.5 Driver page which still shows the 11/16/2010 driver date/v256.01.00f03. But the file I downloaded this morning is named "Retail_256.01.00f03v5.dmg" (28.9MB) - dated Dec 17th. The file I downloaded back in mid-Nov does not have the "V5" in the filename and is larger (37.3MB). I don't own this card and not dug into the pkg to see what changed (i.e. did they remove the extra kexts for other models perhaps?) but just a FYI.
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/archives/jan11/010611.html#quadro4000
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4499
http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-macosx-256.01.00f03-driver.html
Reinstall the 10.6.6 combo update manually is sometimes a good idea (some of us use only combo updates when it comes time to update OS X).
Here: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1349

Similar Messages

  • Ergonomic keyboard 4000 not working properly

    Hi all,
    I have a very weird problem with my MS Ergonomic 4000 keyboard (USB) connected to my MacBook Pro (OS X 10.7.5). I've connected it in the past and it worked just fine but now, it's not functioning properly. I'm typing this on the MacBook keyboard, but here's what happens when I type the letter i using the ergonomic keyboard: i9
    This is just from one tap of the letter i. It only happens with the lower-case i, and not with when typing a capital I (shift+i) This happens with other keys as well.
    I searched the forums and support sites and so have since both removed intellitype and then installed intellitype 8.2 for the proper OS, but still no change.
    Any help / advice will be greatly appreciated!
    Thanks!

    Thanks Esquared,
    I have the same problem in safe mode. I just tried it on my iMac and it does the same thing there. Also, when I press Shift + any key, a dialog pops up asking me to assign a function to a number key that I didn't press. The numlock key types "4" as well.
    So I'm guessing that the issue is with the keyboard itself. The question is, can anything be done? It's relatively new and I'd hate to have to just throw it out.
    Thanks in advance.

  • Nvidia Quadro card not working after 10.6.6

    The software profiler shows the card but there is no output from the DVI and Premiere Pro CS5 (CUDA aware) no longer sees it being available for GPU acceleration

    Solved thanks to http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2710351&tstart=15

  • Nvidia quadro 4000 for mac and os 10.6.8 on After Effects CS6 (11.0.2) Cuda don't work

    Hi,
    We bought an Nvidia Quadro 4000 for Mac for use RayTrace on After Effects CS6 (11.0.2) with our Mac Pro 5.1 on OS 10.6.8.
    And the Mac lost the Cuda driver when we restart it.
    We use the Nvidia driver 256.02.25f01 for Mac Os 10.6.8 and we made test on different Cuda driver (4.1.25, 4.2.10, 5.0.37 and 5.0.47).
    When we install Cuda driver and start directly After Effects 11.0.2 it’s works (after effects see the GPU processor).
    But when we restart the Mac and try to launch After Effects, AE doesn’t see GPU processor and ask to install Cuda driver 4.0 or later.
    Do you know this problem ?
    Do you have a solution ?
    Thanks.
    And sorry for my English !

    Hi All,
    I'm having the exact same problem on 10.6.8 with a brand new Quadro 4000.  My CUDA preferences are up to date, but After Effects CS6 is not seeing the card.
    GPUSniffer gives me some really weird results, which I've included.  Of particular note there is a repeated "just leaking" message, an "invalid drawable" and "Did not find any devices that support GPU computation."
    Anyone have a fix for this?  We just dropped a lot of money on this card so I could squeeze some more life out of this workstation (Mac Pro 4,1 dual quad 2.66 with 12GB RAM).
    Last login: Fri May 31 10:20:47 on console
    edit-e-room-20:~ johnlee$ /Applications/Adobe\ Premiere\ Pro\ CS6/Adobe\ Premiere\ Pro\ CS6.app/Contents/GPUSniffer.app/Contents/MacOS/GPUSniffer
    --- OpenGL Info ---
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.456 GPUSniffer[71708:903] *** __NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x1046095a0 of class NSCFString autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.458 GPUSniffer[71708:903] invalid drawable
    Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
    Renderer: NVIDIA Quadro 4000 OpenGL Engine
    OpenGL Version: 2.1 NVIDIA-1.6.37
    GLSL Version: 1.20
    Monitors: 2
    Monitor 0 properties -
       Size: (0, 0, 2560, 1600)
       Max texture size: 16384
       Supports non-power of two: 1
       Shaders 444: 1
       Shaders 422: 1
       Shaders 420: 1
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.467 GPUSniffer[71708:903] *** __NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x10411d900 of class NSCFString autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.467 GPUSniffer[71708:903] invalid drawable
    Monitor 1 properties -
       Size: (2560, 0, 1600, 1200)
       Max texture size: 16384
       Supports non-power of two: 1
       Shaders 444: 1
       Shaders 422: 1
       Shaders 420: 1
    --- GPU Computation Info ---
    Did not find any devices that support GPU computation.
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.471 GPUSniffer[71708:903] *** __NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x1041234d0 of class NSCFArray autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.471 GPUSniffer[71708:903] *** __NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x1041236a0 of class NSCFArray autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.471 GPUSniffer[71708:903] *** __NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x10411c030 of class NSView autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.471 GPUSniffer[71708:903] *** __NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x10411c030 of class NSView autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.472 GPUSniffer[71708:903] *** __NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x10411b000 of class NSCFArray autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.472 GPUSniffer[71708:903] *** __NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x104110e00 of class NSCFArray autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.472 GPUSniffer[71708:903] *** __NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x10411ccc0 of class NSView autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
    2013-05-31 10:28:52.473 GPUSniffer[71708:903] *** __NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x10411ccc0 of class NSView autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
    edit-e-room-20:~ johnlee$

  • PPro CS5 not talking to NVidia Quadro 4000...

    Apologies in advance if this has been covered a million times on here (and feel free to point me to a thread), but...I have a new Mac setup, Adobe PPro CS5, and the NVidia Quadro 4000 card with MPE/Cuda. And PPro is not using the GPU.
    I do have the latest drivers (for the card and for CUDA). The card was installed a month ago and I grabbed the drivers at that time.
    Recently I worked on a simple 7-minute non-HD video, with no effects and minimal editing...and the publish time was 7 minutes or so.
    I was expecting faster. And while it was publishing, my computer's CPU gauge said it was running at around 90%. I made sure the PPro project setting pointed towards the card GPU.Obviously the MPE and/or CUDA is not kicking in.
    I have spoken to PNY (where I bought the Nvidia card) and they said if I have the latest drivers and could actually see something on my screens, then the card is working and...you know...it must be a problem with the PPro aoftware.
    Oh, the Mac is a 2010 model, 8-core with a ton of RAM on it.
    Thoughts?
    John

    You are not understanding how the MPE engine works. The MPE engine does not lower the overall load of the CPU as far as usage. It lowers the instructions ie the types of code/threads it has to handle in a given time period. The CPU has to handle all  of the Decoding/encoding of the codecs/ie material that you are using. It will also have to process any non accelerated effects. It also handles all memory management and interrupts that is required by the applications, machine code, and hardware. The GPU handles the scaling, interpolation, and some of the effects besides drawing and GUID code. The CPU has to process the Decode then cache the material to ram so it can cache over to the GPU card Ram for CUDA processing. Once threading is done via the GPU then it caches back to the system ram for the CPU to final encode and adjust further frame data for effects. All of this means the entire pipeline happens faster the more load the CPU can handle focused on specific functions and at what GHz those process through the system during a given time. So basically the MPE allows the system to process more work in a given time period simultaneously essentially. So the higher the load on your CPU the faster your entire workflow will process. In simple terms, this means you want the highest CPU load you can get because that means the GPU, system ram, disks, or board throughput is not slowing anything down. Your at 62%. That means your system somewhere in the pipeline is not allowing the cpu to run at max performance in that given time period. I hope that clarify's what you are seeing and why.
    And yes, OS/Application threading and caching is also included in not allowing the CPU to run at max capacity.
    Eric
    ADK

  • The Connect from Intel Pro/1000 T to 1000base-t Port on Catalyst 4000 (WS-X4412-2GB-T= module) Not Working Properly

    The connect from Intel Pro/1000 T to 1000base-t port on Catalyst 4000 (WS-X4412-2GB-T= module) is not working properly. The Intel Pro/1000 T NIC connects to a 10/100 OK. Auto-negotiation is set at both ends. We can successfully ping across the link. However performance is so poor as to make the connection unusable.

    When an Intel Pro/1000 T NIC is connected to a Catalyst switch, the customer may see poor network connections or excessive numbers of dropped packets. The problem arises when a module with a TBI interface transmits an odd byte packet to a receiver with a Gigabit Media Independent Interface (GMII).
    The interoperability issue is a result of the implementation of Carrier Extension. Carrier Extension is detailed in sub section 35.2.3.5 in the IEEE 802.3 specification. Carrier Extension can be used to pad the last byte of a packet, so the packet is aligned on an even numbered boundary.

  • My Nvidia 8800gt doesn't work properly

    I solved part of this issue removing my 550W UPS from my Mac (obviously, Mac Pro needs at least 1500W UPS)
    But the problem is that everytime an app, a render or a game (Final Cut, Youtube, Portal 2, etc...) need graphic hardware, the Mac Pro freezes and the screen becomes greenish/purplish with dots appearing and disappearing all over it. I have to force shut down (pressing 5 secs. the power button), repair disk permissions and avoid graphic usage to work properly...
    I don't know if it is a graphic issue or not, but I realized that when I turn on the computer, the graphic card fan test works perfectly (I hear it speeding up), but it does not speed up when an app, a render or a game need it.
    This has happened since a month and a half.
    I think the freezing is because of a graphic overheat. But I know that the card is not broken because I am using it now for writing this post. Moreover, I blew the fan several times to remove all the dust I could :-)
    Could be a library issue? A fan issue? Should I open the nvidia cover to clean everything? Or replace the thermal paste or something?
    Thank you for your support.

    Quadro Mac OS X Driver Release 256.02.25
    CUDA  Application Support:
      In order to run Mac OS X Applications that leverage the CUDA architecture of  the Quadro 4000 for Mac product, users will need to download and install the CUDA 4.x driver  for Mac located here.
    New in Release 256.02.25f01:
    This driver update is required if upgrading to the  latest Mac OS X v10.6.8.
    Contains performance improvements for a wide range  of applications
    Contains fixes for several corruption and crash  bugs, including issues with Autodesk Mudbox, and World of Warcraft.
    Contains support for display rotation.
    Adds Driver Archive/Restore Functionality.
    Release Notes  Archive:
    Please note that if you are running the Quadro FX  4800 for Mac or the GeForce GTX 285, you do not need to upgrade to this driver
    The NVIDIA Quadro 4000 for Mac requires Mac OS X  v10.6.8 to run, however because OS X does not yet have native support for the  Quadro 4000 for Mac, users must install this driver, in order to have full  hardware acceleration.
    This driver update is for Mac Pro 5,1 (2010), Mac  Pro 4,1 (2009) and Mac Pro 3,1 (2008) users only, whose owners would like to  use the new Quadro 4000 for Mac graphics card.
    If for  any reason you need to uninstall the 256.02.25f01 driver, the “NVIDIA Driver  Restore.mpkg” is located in /Library/Application Support/NVIDIA.
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-macosx-256.02.25f01-driver.html
    I don't see that you need the above, nor is it a firmware update as such.

  • Mercury Playback Engine, CUDA, Quadro 4000, Not rendering

    Hello,
    I am having a problem with the Quadro 4000 card and Premiere CS6. Premiere detects the card but will not render certain filters and transitions.
    I am running a Mac Pro 5,1 with Lion 10.7.5 installed.
    2.4 Quad-Core Intel Xeon, 32GB Memory
    The card shows up in the System Report
    Chipset Model:    NVIDIA Quadro 4000
      Type:    GPU
      Bus:    PCIe
       Slot:    Slot-2
      PCIe Lane Width:    x16
      VRAM (Total):    2048 MB
      Vendor:    NVIDIA (0x10de)
      Device ID:    0x06dd
      Revision ID:    0x00a3
      ROM Revision:    3598
    CUDA drivers are all up to date.
    Nvidia tech support has been unresponsive.
    I have reinstalled the card with no such luck for it working properly. The CUDA has never worked properly. I just did a complete clean reinstall hoping to fix the problem but that did not work either.
    Thanks!

    Yep that's the list, but updated since I last looked at it. Thanks for posting it.
    When we first made the switch from FCP to Adobe Prod Premium I started editing with just the stock card in the MacPro. I new nothing about the Nvidia CUDA thing. This was CS5.5 and it was dog slow on the MacPro. Once I got the 4000, just for kicks I kept dropping 3-way colour corrector filters on a clip to see when it would turn from yellow to red. Without the CUDA card one 3-way filter turned it red, I finally stopped my test after a number of filters /CUDA as it just never turned red. At least until I dropped one filter that wasn't supported in CUDA.
    I have no problem with dip or fade down/up to black as I mentioned, but with CS6 especially I find the timeline much more responsive without CUDA. At least until I start doing some basic colour grading. Even our mobile system, MacBook Pro 17" works really well with software only for MPE at least with fades/dips up/down to black, dissolves, lower thirds, that's about it. Once I add a filter I have to render, but I we don't use MPE hardware on the mobile system for now as it actually is worse with it turned on, sluggish scrubbing in the timeline, etc.
    My very general workflow on the MacPro is to edit with only one sequence open and unless I'm doing a lot of graphics try and keep only Premiere open. We have an eSATA 4 drive RAID (0) and edit mostly H.264 footage now (used to be all HDV) from a Panasonic camera, a GoPro HD and 5d. So were are not taxing the system like some would, though the H.264 is a challenging codec in some respects as you know. We only have 12 gig of ram, but find that works fine for most of what we do. I will probably add more eventually as Motion just sucks it up, but don't use AE currently.
    Sorry I'm rambling a bit, but one last thing. Don't know if this matters with your issue, but we always do a clean install when we update the OS. So we wiped the drive on the MacPro and installed Mountain Lion from scratch and, of course, everything else. Haven't done a lot of editing on this new OS yet as we were gun shy about this serious error crashing many were having and had been editing on the mobile system in 5.5 then 6.

  • Photomerge: no final image after 10.6.7 with Nvidia Quadro 4000

    Hi, as it was stated in similar thread I have this issue. / http://forums.adobe.com/thread/852821?tstart=0 /
    But in tha threat mentioned above, problem was solved:
    "3. May 18, 2011 3:50 PM in response to: Chris Cox
    Re: Photomerge Crashes
    I think the problem was that there was an "ñ" in the file names. Now it works!"
    My file names are: _MG_7975_1z3.psd
    So probably it is not a problem with the name. I have:
      Model Name: Mac Pro
      Model Identifier: MacPro4,1
      Processor Name: Quad-Core Intel Xeon
      Processor Speed: 2.93 GHz
      Number Of Processors: 2
      Total Number Of Cores: 8
      Memory: 20 GB
    with Nvidia Quadro 4000 installed.
    After I downloaded 10.6.7 I had a problem with my graphic card, new mac OS version erased something but I solved it when I found on Nvidia forum solution and downloaded new Nvidia 4000 drivers. But help me now with new problem: photomerge - no final image. I have a huge project with extensive using of that tool. Thanks in advance!

    I think that it is the answer:

  • Server 2012 HyperV woth Nvidia Quadro 4000

    Hi
    i am looking for a server, where we can use several HyperV's and we want to put in the server a Nvidia Quadro 4000 to add some graphic performance.
    so my question is whether it will work or not
    thank u in advance
    marco
    --cacciu--

    Hi Marco,
    Personally, I don’t have any related experience regarding this field, you may get insights from other forum community members.
    Best Regards,
    Amy
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

  • How to Install Nvidia Quadro 4000 in Dell R710

    Hi All,
    I have read a lot about installing the Nvidia Quadro PCIe x16 card in a Dell R710.  I know what parts I need to order (Dell GP347 PCI-e Left Riser), but I do not know how to install the 6 pin power cable required by the Nvidia card.  Where would I connect it to the Dell R710 motherboard?  Is there a place to connect it?  If not, is there some type of power supply I can hook the 6 pin Nvidia Power cable and provide power outside of the server?  Any help would be appreciated.

    This is a bit old now, but thought I would reply as I got this working and very happy with the performance!
    In addition to the riser board I needed, there is NO way to provide the power the card needs without an EXTERNAL power supply.  There is a really small box listed on Newegg called "ePOWER EP-450CD 450W ATX12V/EPS12V Modular Juice Box-Dedicated Graphics Card and CPU Power supply".  Buy it and run the GPU power cable from an empty PCI slot out the back of the Dell Server.
    I also purchased NVidia Quadro 4000 2 GB GDDR5 PCIe video cards for each of my ESXi 5.5 servers. Also, I left my built-in video graphic card enabled and it is still primary for my Hypervisor.
    Download and install the NVidia ESXi drivers from their website and follow the directions to install them.  Reboot.
    I use sVGA with my Horizon Desktops and downloaded a trial version of Sketch-Up to test 3D.  They have a community of users who post 3D renderings and you can download one directly from the Sketch-up Program.  Cruise around and check the performance.
    As a side note, I noticed IE worked way worse by using the GPU when Browsing the internet.  Go to Advanced Settings in IE, and the top option states "Use software rendering instead of GPU".  Making that change makes IE work as expected.

  • Nvidia quadro 4000 or 5000 in Mac Pro

    Hello all,
    I have this question that I already make to a sale advisor in a Mac store and he do not know what to answer and also I do it to a technical Mac sales agent and again nothing.
    I do not own a Mac pro yet, I am looking to buy one becuase is the only system that can hold (in a stable way) both Mac OS X and Windows 7.
    I am a professional working with 3D content creation, CAD design and digital video and I want to be able to do pro 3D content with Windows 7 and also working in pro videos in Mac OSX. The actual graphic cards for the Mac pro 2010 are intended for video games instead of professional production (this is the info posted in the AMD/ATI website when one do the search for Radeon 5770 and 5780, of course they can handle some 3d content but not as the latest generation of Nvidia cards)
    My question is:
    Can I use a Mac pro with one of those ATI cards installed in the 1st PCIe 2.0 16x port for the MAC OS X and then install a Nvidia Quadro 4000 or 5000 in the second PCIe 2.0 16x port for Windows 7? (given the fact that Nvidia do not have even beta drivers for Mac OS X for those types of cards yet)
    Im thinking that I can use the Mac with the ATI and then when swiching to Windows (trough Boot Camp) using the Nvidia Quadro but I am not sure if this is possible and if installing another card will created probs. and if is posible how to relate each card to each OS.
    I ask this before having the Mac becuase I am planing to make a huge inversion on it and I want to be sure about this. (The specs. will be 32gb ram, 512gb ssd, 3x2tb hdd, 2x2.93ghz6c xeons)
    Thank you all and I will be pleased to heard any comments or suggestions.

    The Quadro FX 5800 is launching at $3,499, and its spec sheet looks well furnished: 240 stream processors, fill rate of 52 billion texels per second, 128-bit precision, true 10-bit color support, 102GB/s memory bandwidth (which should translate to an 800MHz GDDR3 clock speed, if my math is right), and "interactive 4D modeling with time lapse capabilities." Nvidia says the Quadro FX 5800 should be well suited to applications like "oil and gas exploration, medical imaging, styling and design, and scientific visualization."
    http://techreport.com/discussions.x/15866
    First announced fall-winter 2008
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/productquadro_fx_5800us.html
    If you wanted to use nVidia's Quadro CX to speed up CS5, it is Windows only, and the Mac only has TWO 6-pin connectors. So even though Quadro 5800 power is under 200W there are no more aux power connectors. Though you can try to add a small 450W PSU for graphics 2 x 8-pin./2 x 6-pin) it gets messy running from the 2nd optical drive bay and tight fit-impossible for cables. Not designed for dual graphic card power.
    The GTX 285 EVGA came out for Mac last year but drivers have been a problem with performance and a year later 10.6.4 and nVidia rushed to post a patch but there has been no word now that the GTX 285 went EOL. What's up with that?

  • NVidia Quadro 4000 First Impressions

    I've seen some questions and some discussion regarding the nVidia Quadro 4000 card. Mine arrived yesterday, I figured I would share my initial experiences with it to help give others guidance so they can make the best decisions for their own needs.
    First off, if your primary interest (or a significant interest) is playing games, than a Quadro card is not for you. nVidia's high end cards are fine-tuned on both a hardware and software (driver) level in the needs of pro apps and manipulating very large data sets. It happens at the expense of some performance stats that matter to gamers. Quadro cards aren't designed to get you a higher fps in your favorite shooter, they're designed to get you better performance with ray-tracing, real-time 3D environments, and scientific use. I'll leave you to surf to nVidia's web site for more marketing speak on that. In my initial tests, I found that to be completely true. I don't do much gaming, but the couple games I tested performed no faster than the GTX-285 I had in the machine before.
    Attempting to run some more tests, I found that RealTech VR's OpenGL extensions viewer (which has some decidedly gamer-centric benchmarks) showed little to no improvement over the GTX-285 (as expected).
    Running a few test renders in Cinema 4D, I found only about a 5-7% increase in performance. That might be due to immature drivers, but it may also be due to C4D renders being more about CPU mucle (Maxon doesn't have any specific CUDA-support or acceleration). What I did notice was that moving/camming around in the app was much improved. I couldn't say if that had to do with an extra gigabyte of vram, or if it was some kind of 'Fermi' magic (Fermi's the name of this generation chip technology from nVidia).
    I have not yet gotten the chance to give Adobe CS5 (and specifically Premiere Pro and After Effects) a serious workout, though just playing around I noticed that the Quadro card had much more capacity for handling multiple layers of video in real time (I threw a dozen videos onto a main track in varying sizes of 'picture-in-picture' display, and arbitrarily adjusted the speed of some and color corrected others). It handled everything I could throw at it without appearing to break into a sweat, and I haven't yet had time to give it a proper performance test.
    Being an early adopter, I have the expectation that on initial release there will be kinks and hiccups, and that as the drivers mature the performance will improve dramatically. Based on discussions with colleagues and what I've seen in reviews, this has been the case with both the GTX-285 and the Quadro FX 4800 card, and probably was also the case on older nVidia cards as well. The Quadro 4000 met those expectations - it feels like this is still a work in progress. The drivers (version 256.01.00f03) are stable (no crashes, no kernel panics, no horrible situations to speak of), but based on my early results I'd guess that they're not optimized for speed, either. On the Windows side, nVidia has driver version 259 available as a 'certified' release, and a higher performance version 260 available, and performance under Windows 7 Professional (64-bit) seems better. To be fair, the card's been on the market for PC's since late July, those drivers are more mature.
    I still need to give the card a serious workout with Adobe CS5, but so far things look promising. Anecdotally, I've also noticed that system performance is greatly improved when I'm doing lots of multi-tasking. I often have several different apps running at once, and between the new technology and the additional video memory (my old card had 1GB, this has 2GB), I find I can juggle 20+ apps and dozens of Safari windows/tabs running without the Mac Pro batting an eyelash. That's hard to quantify in a specific benchmark, but it's very welcome considering the way I tend to work.
    As the drivers improve, and as my own workflow evolves to make more use of larger datasets and more complex 3D scenes, I see the Quadro 4000 really starting to shine. Heavy-duty CUDA users may be happy to know that this card only requires a single additional power connection, which means that you can install two of these cards into a single Mac Pro (for a total of 512 CUDA cores). If you're doing big scientific work or working with CUDA-supported ray tracing (or other plugins), or doing extremely elaborate things with RED camera footage, that may likely be a game-changer for you. For me, it'll likely be quite some time before I outgrow what this card can do.

    As I'd mentioned in another thread, the card began shipping last week. I expect that it will take a couple months before places like Apple and Amazon to dig through the large number of backorders they have (I don't think this card is produced in mass quantity, even on the PC side).
    My system setup is a Mac Pro 8x2.26GHz, 32GB RAM, 8TB HD storage, nVidia Quadro 4000 2GB driving the primary display, and nVidia GT120 driving a secondary display. I'm considering getting third party power supply unit that sits in the second optical drive bay, and would plug into the Mac Pro's power supply, and then provide additional power supply connectors that would allow me to plug in my GTX-285 as a secondary graphics card (since it uses 2 connectors, and the Mac Pro only has 2 total).
    Even when my machine was using a GTX-285 and the GT-120, I could see a difference in performance when dragging an application window (particularly if it's a 3D app) from main display to the secondary (the GT-120 is a significantly lower power card, with only 32 CUDA cores and 512MB video memory). With the Quadro driving my primary display the difference is much more noticeable now.
    From what I understand, there are some technical issues with using ATI and nVidia GPU's in the same machine, so attempting to use with a 5770 may not work. But if you were able to use them together, it would make more sense to have the Quadro card driving your primary display, since it's likely going to perform as well or better than any other card you might be able to pair it with.
    I've already given some thought to a second Quadro card down the road. As the drivers mature, and the apps I use evolve to make better use of CUDA and OpenCL, and my own workflow and skills improve to the point where I'm doing more 3D modeling/rendering (and stuff like ray-tracing), then having 2 of these cards in a single machine could really come in handy. Today it appears that all those CUDA cores and VRAM are serving to help make the apps faster and more responsive at design time, but rendering is still very CPU-centric. But tomorrow those apps will hopefully be able to tap into the GPU to help improve render times.

  • How do you setup HDMI audio with "Nvidia Quadro 4000 for Mac"?

    So I just purchased a new Mac Pro:
    Mac Pro (5,1) 3.33 GHz 6-Core
    8 GB Ram
    ATI Radeon HD 5770
    1TB HDD
    OS 10.8.3
    I also purchased a new Nvidia Quadro 4000 for Mac Graphics Card because the 3D animation software I'm using (Blender) requires this card to accelerate render times. 
    I have installed the card and all is working well as far as I can tell except for the HDMI audio.  According to the specs on Nvidia for this card, it DOES support HDMI audio through the Display port.  I have my HDMI cable plugged up and the video works great.  However the audio option does not show up in the System Preferences.  (Here is the page for the graphics card.  Look under "specifications" at the bottom for the audio part.  http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-quadro-4000-mac-us.html).
    I did find a link for a kernel addition for HDMI audio but it stated "non-Apple Nvidia cards" and this one is specifically for Mac.  Here is that link:  http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1499797.  (I also plan on posing the same question there.)
    The reason I want the HDMI to work is I'm using a TV as my monitor.
    Now I did try the HDMI with the ATI Card and both the audio and video work great. 
    What I did for a quick work around is install both cards and use the GPU processor on the Nvidia for the animation program and use the ATI for the actual port and this fixes the hdmi audio issue.  However this takes up pretty much all of my PCI slots and seems like a waste of space and power.
    Has anyone else run into this problem and found a solution??  Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks!

    I went ahead and tried that extension that I found.  It worked! 
    I guess Mac just didn't include the audio support in the driver that it includes.  Below is were I found the instructions and download.  It includes a shell script that installs the kernal from the Terminal prompt.  The instructions were clear and installed with out a hitch.  There were also instructions to remove it if there were issues. 
    Here is the link:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1499797
    Thanks again and hope this helps.

  • NVidia Quadro 4000 and early 2008 Mac Pro (3,1)

    Hi to all.
    I think my display card just died.
    I've been wanting to get the NVidia Quadro 4000 for a while now as I do editing professionally and would like to make the Adobe Production suite zippier.
    So now, I have no functional card for my monitors. Can I use the NVidia Quadro 4000 for my Dell monitors? One of the Dell's has a DVI-D2 input but the other has only VGA as far as I can tell. Or does it make more sense to get a different card? Or both the Quadro and a lower level card?
    Also, does the NVidia Quadro 4000 need extra power and if so, how easy is it to connect and would I be able to use the DVD burner?
    Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
    Running Snow Leopard, 18GB RAM

    So many questions and so little time... lunch!
    There is Wikipedia.
    AMD = OpenCL
    Nvidia = OpenCL and CUDA
    CUDA is part of every Nvidia card, GeForce GTX or Quadro
    Open source compiler to make CUDA and OpenCL much easier and better (OpenCL is 4-5 yrs old but a pain to code and optimize with a lot of micro management. Not today but AMD's support for just OpenCL is limiting. But something to support both technologies is a year away probably.
    Dual boot is a must! Clone your system / or install Lion on 2nd drive
    Setup Assistant to import from 10.6 to Lion so you have both.
    Clones as backup.
    Out of the box: the startup is missing on screen without the modification. The drivers are normally and only found bundled into OS X which is why you don't normally see or have to go to AMD to get the latest driver. Or downgrade to a better working driver. you have to rely on OS X and version.
    That is why GTX 5xx and 10.7.3
    OWC charges more than Amazon or Apple and charges for 6-pin cable. The 5770 does work - with 10.6.5 or later. It does not work with older OS - no driver. It does not allow you to boot from your 10.6.0 DVD and install.
    You could order the GTX 570 (I'd skp on 560, I have looked into both but up to you). And 680s are not supported yet, and still scarce. But great card for the $499.
    The GTX 570 2.5GB was the one recommended with its 2.5GB VRAM. $349.
    http://www.evga.com/products/
    To get a boot screen means modifying the card which means sending it to Calif and $100 + shipping.
    Some people use the GTX purely for CUDA and still use ATI 5770 for their monitor.
    Oh, yes, died. No card on hand as backup or spare.
    Shame. I'd toss coin and then go with.... Q4K but
    http://www.amazon.com/PNY-DisplayPort-Profesional-Graphics-VCQ4000MAC-PB/dp/B004 CRS78O
    You could wait and see. I'd over night the Q4K for $810, then see how that does, it does have 2x the VRAM. And you could use GTX 570 or 680 down the road when you do upgrade to Lion plus.
    Comparing 5770 to Q4K:
    http://www.jigsaw3d.com/articles/gpu-performance-review-nvidia-quadro-4000-for-m ac
    Quadro CUDA driver support
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/mac-driver-archive.html

Maybe you are looking for

  • Windows Vista Beta 2 and Soundblaster PCI

    When Windows Vista Beta 2 was first installed, it installed a generic driver for the PCI52 sound card. However, since the driver is generic It has limited functionality. I am not able to enable the quadraphonic option in Control Panel under the "Audi

  • Itunes recognizes iPad, but doesn't show up a summery bar...

    Hey everyone. I just recently bought an iPad today, and was so eager to get started on using it. I plugged it into my mac, and itunes opens up... that's all it ******* does though! Basically on the devices screen it DOES show the iPad, but when I cli

  • IPhone does not appear as iTunes device

    Since the update my iphone has only intermitently appeared as a device in itunes.  How can i make it appear so i can sync it?

  • Java Importer and org.w3c.dom.Element

    I am getting the following error when attempting to import a class generated in Jdeveloper. Exception occurred: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/w3c/dom/Element The package has the following header package mypackage3; import oracle.soap.transport.

  • Office 2008 install after Yosemite Clear Install

    Just finished a Clear Install of Yosemite IOS. Trying to install Office 2008 but in vain! The installer crashes with the following message " the installer can't extract the files from the package for Office 2008" Any ideas ??