OEM Version Compatibility Question

Hello
OMS and Repository is on 10.2.0.5
All my agents are on 10.2.0.5
All my databases are on 10.2.0.4
In one particular environment, the database is on 10.2.0.4 and agent is on 10.2.0.3. I am unable to see the Database Instance related health details or "Related Links" on that Database Home page on the OEM Console.
Please let me know if Low Versioned Agent be able to collect the health related data for a high Versioned Database?

Upgrade the agent to 10204 on that target

Similar Messages

Re: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Fortev30L2 on D

Dirk:
I ran into a similar problem. I added an other flag to my fcompile script and
it seems to be working fine, your mileage may vary. The flag was
-cflags "-oldcxx only"
Dwayne Kryger
"Haben, Dirk" <[email protected]> on 08/25/99 02:09:16 AM
To: "'Soapbox Forte Users'" <[email protected]>
cc: (bcc: Dwayne Kryger/SEH)
Subject: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Forte v30L2 on
Digital Unix 4 d and C++ version ???
G'day Folxs
Just installed Forte as a Simple Server on a Digital UNIX (v4.0d) box (being
a VMSbot it was much easier than I thought). We want to use it to interface
with an existing web client. The Forte part is to provide us a scalable
access path to Oracle DBs on the VMS machine; already running Forte.
I'm having trouble finding media that contains C++ v5.4.-006 for the Unix
box. Does anyone know of/has used higher versions of C++ without too much
drama? How about v5.7 or even v6.1? We will be using extensive C++
interfacing to existing web pages!
NB: The current web system client is compiled using EGCS 2.91.66.
TIA,
/[:-)irK
Dirk Haben, Perth WA
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

Dirk:
I ran into a similar problem. I added an other flag to my fcompile script and
it seems to be working fine, your mileage may vary. The flag was
-cflags "-oldcxx only"
Dwayne Kryger
"Haben, Dirk" <[email protected]> on 08/25/99 02:09:16 AM
To: "'Soapbox Forte Users'" <[email protected]>
cc: (bcc: Dwayne Kryger/SEH)
Subject: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Forte v30L2 on
Digital Unix 4 d and C++ version ???
G'day Folxs
Just installed Forte as a Simple Server on a Digital UNIX (v4.0d) box (being
a VMSbot it was much easier than I thought). We want to use it to interface
with an existing web client. The Forte part is to provide us a scalable
access path to Oracle DBs on the VMS machine; already running Forte.
I'm having trouble finding media that contains C++ v5.4.-006 for the Unix
box. Does anyone know of/has used higher versions of C++ without too much
drama? How about v5.7 or even v6.1? We will be using extensive C++
interfacing to existing web pages!
NB: The current web system client is compiled using EGCS 2.91.66.
TIA,
/[:-)irK
Dirk Haben, Perth WA
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

OEM version 9 question

I am interested. I am getting an error occuring against one of my databases. In the trace file is the following SQL statement.
SELECT "TABLESPACE_NAME" FROM "DBA_FREE_SPACE" "DBA_FREE_SPACE" WHERE LNNVL (:1<>"TABLESPACE_NAME")
I am trying to determine if this is coming from OEM version 9. The reason I ask is because I am running OEM on two different machines and a process that contains this SQL statement keeps failing. The trace file indicates teh process is comming from these two machines that have OEM (and a bunch of other things on it).
Has anyone seen the SQL statement before and where.
Thanks
Tim

Upgrade the agent to 10204 on that target

Incopy/indesign version compatibility question

Hi all,
I feel like this should be something easy to find in Adobe's information, but I couldn't find it. Maybe I'm just slow.
OK, we are a small (free) weekly newspaper. The person who puts the paper together uses InDesign CS5. We do not currently have InCopy. We would like to get InCopy for one of our editors, to work with in the documents made by the person with InDesign CS5.
My question of course being...since we can apparently only buy InCopy CS6 now (maybe 5.5 if we really hurry) will it be able to work with the older version of InDesign, or would our InDesign need to be updated to CS6 as well?
Being a small free paper, we cannot afford to do that...thus my question. While I understand I could have called an Adobe rep, I don't have time to deal with a sales person at this point, just trying to gather information for my boss.
Thanks!

Hurry and buy CS5.5 now. You can work that with one exception. Remote packaging won’t work.
Dropbox is very good alternative to that. But again. HURRY! Come Monday CS5.5 won’t be available and nothing will work.
You should be eligible for a free upgrade to CS6 as well.
Bob

Version Compatibility Question

Can an applet or application created in an older version still work with a newer version without recompiling in the newer version? I have code from 1.3 that I want to work with 1.4 but don't want to make new users download both 1.3 and 1.4 jre's and also don't want to have to recompile all the older code everytime a new version is released. If a 1.3 applet is downloaded to run and the 1.3 jre isn't installed but the 1.4 is, I am asked to download 1.3. Is there a line in the applet tag that specifies which version to use? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

But doesn't specifying the plugin version in the
object tag require them to have a specific version of
the plugin installed. ie. if they have 1.4 installed,
but the object tag want 1.3 then it will attempt to
install 1.3.Not quite. It will only install a new version if the version you currently have is older (i.e. a lower version number) than the version specified in the object tag. If 1.4 is installed, then it can run 1.3 without an installation.
This behavior makes sense but it can be problematic at times. For example, our applet works fine with 1.3.0 and 1.3.1_01 but fails with 1.3.1_02 for some reason. If a user has 1.3.1_02, we have to ask them to manually uninstall the JRE and then hit our app. Anyone have a way to get around this?

Airespace OEM APs Compatibility Question

Does anyone know if OEM Airespace APs (Airespace 1200)are compatiable with code 4.1 or higher on a Cisco 4400 WLC?

Hi Curtis,
The Airespace 1200 is now the Cisco 1000 which is still supported :)
WLC 4.1.191 Release notes;
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn411850.html
Hope this helps!
Rob

Basic question; compatability of Win XP oem version with Parallels on mac

I am very new to this, being a recent win to mac convert so please excuse.
I have ordered a new Imac 24 and I need to use a few of my old windows programs on it. I understand the use of parallel and boot camp.
my question; I would like to purchase the OEM version of Win XP as it is less expensive than the full boxed version.
Will it work on the boot camp and Parallel programs and allow me to boot up win XP on my new mac and use the windows based Dragon Naturally speaking program.???
thanks in advance for your anticipated response.

Yes

Is Windows 7 64bit OEM version installable via Boot camp?

I just bought an iMAC with a 27in display. It has a 3.4 GHz i7 processor and runs Apple Lion 10.7.2 OS. Over a year ago I bought an OEM version of Windows 7 called WIN PRO 7 64-BIT english version to install in a AMD processor PC I was assembling. I never used it and never opend the box. According to the written conditions on the box, it must be preinstalled on the hard drive using the OEM Preinstallation Kit (OPK). My question is:
Will this version of Windows 7 install properly using the Apple Bootcamp process software? Will it be able to run in the Bootcamp setup hard drive partition set aside for Windows use?
I am cautious by nature and I don't want to do anything dumb. I remember Ginzburgs corallary to Murphy's Law. Murphy was nothing but a dammned optimist!
Many thanks ......K6JPJ

Rather than asking in the Windows Compatibility forum you should try asking in the Boot Camp forum where Windows Versions and Boot Camp are frequently discussed. https://discussions.apple.com/community/windows_software/boot_camp

Can I install an OEM version of Windows 7 on my Mac?

I am completely unfamiliar with windows terminology. I ordered a copy of Windows 7 64-bit and when it came it said OEM on it and had all these warnings that it had to be preinstalled on a computer and I assumed it was like the software that comes with a Mac that you can only install on that one machine. I returned it unopened because I was afraid it wouldn't work. Since then I've read on these boards that OEM is a system builder, and it's cheaper, which is why I got it, and can only be used on one machine. But it sounds like I could install it on one Mac. I don't really care about installing it on more than one machine. So my question is, is that correct? can I install an OEM version of Windows 7 on one Mac? I wanted to check, because although it's cheaper, it's still almost $100 and I didn't want to waste that if I opened it and it didn't work. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. I plan to use parallels by the way, but I am posting on this board because it was suggested that you folks know the most about windows.

Answered here https://discussions.apple.com/message/21400262#21400262

Photoshop Extended version compatability

I have Photoshop CS3 Extended on both PC (Windows XP) and Mac (OS X Leopard). I'm able to upgrade the PC to CS5 Extended but not the Mac.
My questions are:
1 - Will Photoshop CS5 extended work on Windows XP?
2 - Are CS3 and CS5 backwards compatible - if I work on a document in PC CS5 will the Mac CS5 version be able to open it? I know there will be some things that would not translate backwards, such as Puppet Warp and some of the newer masking and layers features, but I'd still like to be able to work on more basic functions of masking, cloning, etc. on both computers.
Thanks for any help,
Marcy

Noel Car boni wrote:
For the most part, a document saved from Photoshop CS5 will be no problem to open in CS3. There's a "Maximize Compatibility" setting in Edit - Preferences - File Handling section that you'll want to set to "Always".
-Noel
My take is that the compatibility setting should be set based on the kind of work one does. I have it set to "Never". When you check this setting ON you tell Photoshop to save along with all your layers another entity, which is a flattened version of the image. This, makes every PSD file you save larger by a non trival amount.
So this setting should have no effect regarding Photoshop to Photoshop version compatibility. All Photoshop versions understand layers and do not need a flattened version. It's intended to maximize the compatibility between Photoshop and any other program that does not know about layers but reads PSD files. If you have many of your PSD files going to, for example, Lightroom or Premiere then set it to "Always". If not, you can set it to "Ask" or "Never" and save yourself a lot of storage space.
Paulo

Installing OEM version 10.2.0.4

Dear Friend,
I am trying to install OEM version 10.2.0.4 and I found that the fastes way to do it is to install the software and then patch it.
I fallow this step.s
1. install database binary and patch it to 10.2.0.4 and then create a new database.
2. install the binaries of oem 10.2.0.1 and then patch it to 10.2.0.4.
3. configure the OEM.
I have done stops 1,2 many times but I always fail in step 3 because configuration scripts can't connect to the repository database.
I have setup the linstern and database are up what is wrong and is those stops are the correct ones.?
Regards,
Khalid.

Hi mnazim,
Regarding to your reply on changing the listener port of EMD in one of post here. (Installing OEM version 10.2.0.4)
I have a question for you:
Im getting the same error in my emagent.trc
2008-10-26 17:46:28 Thread-4108307376 ERROR pingManager: nmepm_pingReposURL: Cannot connect to http://host.domainname:5500/em/upload/: retStatus=-32
The EM here (production) DB keeps on restarting. I tried also to install EM DBControl in UAT, the same procedure with what I did in PROD but PROD keepd on restarting while in UAT is not. Checking the netstat, this what I get.
PROD where EMD_URL is http://<em>node1.domainname</em>:1831/emd/main
$ netstat -a | grep 1831
tcp 0 0 *:1831 *:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 node1.domainname:1831 node1.domainname:61453 TIME_WAIT
UAT where EMD_URLis http://<em>node.domainname</em>:3938/emd/main
$ netstat -a | grep 3938
tcp 0 0 *:3938 *:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9204 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9212 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9208 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9209 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9211 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9198 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9217 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9216 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9223 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9221 node.domainname:3938 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9220 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:9224 node.domainname:3938 TIME_WAIT
tcp 0 0 node.domainname:3938 node.domainname:9213 TIME_WAIT
udp 0 0 node.domainname:3938 *:*
Doest this mean that in UAT, the port is listening, but in PROD, it is not.??
(note: I run the command where status of the DBConsole for both server is running)
Regards to all,
Jay A
Edited by: Jay A on Oct 27, 2008 1:30 AM to insert the link

WAP54G Version compatibility

I am trying to create a wireless bridge between a network with ip's 198.1.1.xxx (this network has the gateway) to a network with ip's 198.1.2.xxx - so that it can access the internet thru the gateway). Both AP's are WAP54G set to bridge mode. Both are configured identically except for the IP numbers. SSID broadcast disabled and security off. From everything I have read, I should be able to ping (example 4.2.2.2) from 198.1.2.xxx - but cannot. The only difference I can see it that one of the WAP54G's is version 2 and the other is Version 3. Both have firmware 3.0.4.
Question: Can anyone confirm that I can or cannot create a wireless bridge with differing versions of the same device?
As a plan B, I have on order a WET200. Should I have two on order to act as a matched pair as the WAP54G's had to be?
Thank you.
Craig

I work with psd, indd and illu/eps files. I've heard the weird argument that "cause of new features it's not possible to be version compatible, but that's down right silly. Text on top of an image should be readable in any version. Even with a copule of adjustment layers it should be no problems with version compatibility. That Adobe choose to lock and force is another story. I guess I will be sticking to my CS6 version in the years to come. I paid a lot of money for that Master Collection. I also corresponde files with many CS4 users on the client side.

OIM Java Compatibility Question

Hi
We have OIM 9.1.0.2 BP07 deployed in Weblogic 10.3.0 in test env. Our java version is JDK 1.6.0_10. All our adapters are compiled in this version. We are using this version of java since 1 year.
Now we are moving to production, and we are not able to get exact java version which we used in test env in internet. My question is if I install java which is certified by weblogic 10.3(i.e 1.6.0_05) then will I face any issues in OIM? is it mandatory to use exact version of java from one env to another?
Thanks

Does not make any difference with sub versions. The version compatibility comes into picture at a higher level like JDK 1.5 or JDK 1.6.
Consider the connector development team, they develop connectors on JDK 1.6 (could be any sub version) and when a customer uses that OOTB connector, they can use any of those sub-versions within JDK 1.6.
Also the fact that if its your custom adapters then you should be aware that what all java functions you are using and I assume it would be the basic ones, so the version difference should not bring in any issues. If its OOTB connector then see the certification matrix as well.

OEM versions query

We are putting together a proposal to purchase a server to host OEM. We need to support a range of databases from 7.1x up to 10.2. I am assuming that this cannot be done with a single version of OEM – investigations suggest that version 2.2 will support databases back to 7.3.4 up to 8.1.7, but I can’t find information on any older databases.
We are planning to install on a Windows 2003 server – could someone tell me which versions of OEM we will need, if these can be installed on 2003 and if different OEM versions can sit on the same machine? Pointers towards documentation will do – I can’t find any which answer these questions, but I always have been useless at internet searching!
cheers

You're right the docs say OEM 2.2 will support 7.3.4.
I'm not sure of anything pre-7.3.4
Something to bear in mind, that does work but isn't in the docs (nor is it supported), if you run OEM 9i and put a 8i agent where your 7.3.4 database is, then OEM9i will work/communicate with the 7.3.4 database. We ran that configuration for a long time a couple of years ago.
I can't see why you can't run OEM9i and 10g Grid on the same server (you'll have to have two separate databases for their respective repositories), just be wary of port conflicts. Although the default ports of OEM9 and Grid off the top of my head, are totally different.
Test OEM9i (with an 8i agent) with your 7.1.x databases, if it works then go for OEM9i. 2.2 should be avoided if possible, its not as stable as OEM9i.
Just the oracle docs should be enough to get you started, but your best bet is to rig a test configuration together and just see what is feasible.

WSUS updates not applying to Office 2013 Home and Business OEM version

Hi
For some reason I cannot get WSUS updates to automatically install on clients running Office 2013 Home and Business OEM version.
For example
If user opens any of the office 2013 apps e.g. Outlook , word etc, it prompts a message at the top under the ribbon toolbar; UPDATE NOW.
All other updates for OS are downloading and installing just fine from our WSUS server.
What could this be?
I dont have this issue with clients running office 2003

First thing you need to do is be absolutely certain which edition of Office you have installed.
There are five editions of "Office 365" and these days, almost anything that is "OEM" is almost certainly Office 365:
Office 365 Home
Office 365 Personal
Office 365 Small Business
Office 365 Small Business Premium
Office 365 Midsize Business
Office 365 ships with an activation code for an online management account, and authorizes the installation of the software on up to five devices. Office 365 is updated via the WEB .. ONLY.
In addition there are three editions of Office 2013:
Office Home & Student
Office Home & Business
Office Professional
If you have one of these three editions, you should also have a DVD and a Product Activation Code for the SINGLE-PC installation which is licensed for these editions provided by the vendor of your computers. Office 2013 can be updated using WSUS.
Since you're getting a prompt IN THE APPLICATION to "Update Now", I believe you're looking at instances of Office 365, not Office 2013. Office 2013 (desktop) does not provide in-product prompts for updates/upgrades.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

OEM Version Compatibility Question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for