OIM - Email notification to a specific user based on a dynamic rule

Hello, After creation of account in a particular target resource I need to send an email to a specific user based on the location of the user (e.g area admin).
In the notification tab of process tasks, I see only "Assignee", "Requestor", "User", "User Manager"? How can I achive the above specified requirement?
Before posting this question, I tried to search the forum for any previous posts related to this. But I couldn't find any. May be I was not searching with right key words.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.

You'll need to custom code an adapter to send the email, then you can send to any user you want. Create a new task and trigger it off the completion response code. You can use the following apis:
tcEmailNotificationUtil sendMail = new tcEmailNotificationUtil(ioDatabase);
sendMail.setBody("Type your body here or use a string variable");
sendMail.setSubject("Type your subject here or use a string variable");
sendMail.setFromAddress("[email protected]");
sendMail.sendEmail("[email protected]");
Just populate the above pieces with the information needed.
-Kevin

Similar Messages

Need to send notification to a specific person based on condition

Please help.
I need to send notification to a specific person based on condition. When a specific hold is placed on an invoice, send a notification to the Buyer who is referenced on the Purchase Order that is associated with that invoice. It will be an FYI notification.
I'm looking at APINVHDN AP Hold Maiin Process. I thought possibly adding a notification into the "No" condition after the GET_APPROVER function since there would not be an approver on the invoice since it's on hold.
Any ideas would be very much appreciated.

Try the LiveCycle Designer forum.

Assign Task to a specific user based on the value of DDL from the form

Hello,
Can any one please advise me on how to assign a task to a specific user based on the value of the drop down list from the form. E.g. user fills the form and before they submit the form they have to select one of the name from the drop down list so the form can go to that person for approval.
Thanks in advance,
Han

I got it works now by using the xpath expression (in workbench) to assign to the selected user from the DDL in the form.

OIM Email Notification issue with custom E-mail user attribute

Hi All,
We have a requirement where we need to send e-mail notification programmatically after a OIM account is created for the user through trusted reconciliation. Post process event handler is being used for this. We have created our own Custom Notification Event, created new Notification Template of the type Custom Notification Event.
For storing e-mail address for every OIM user we are using custom attribute "Email Home". Now the problem is NotificationService is by default picking e-mail address from OTB attribute "Email". Is there a simple way to pick the E-mail address from custom attribute? Below is sample code that we are working on. Any ideas on this would be very helpful.
NotificationService notService = Platform.getService(NotificationService.class);
NotificationEvent event = new NotificationEvent();
String[] receiverUserIds= {"<<*Comma separated list of OIM USER IDs to whom notification is to be sent*>>" }; sets the email address in the OTB "Email" attribute as receivers
LOGGER.info("Receiver User ID set");
event.setUserIds(receiverUserIds);
event.setTemplateName(poTemplateName);
event.setSender("<<*OIM User ID of sender*>>"); /// sets the email address in the OTB "Email" attribute as sender
HashMap<String, Object> templateParams = new HashMap<String, Object>();
templateParams.put("usr_login",poUserId);
LOGGER.info("template Param set" templateParams);+
event.setParams(templateParams);
notService.notify(event);
Thanks

Hi,
any updates on this issue?
is there any possibility to resend the old notifications manually?
Thanks,
Prasad

OIM: email notification for any updates to user

We have a database connector
Based on the user role we will provision read and update access
There are two access policies one for read and other for update.
Lookup table has two values
Read Read
Update Update
Access policy triggers based on the lookup table value.
For create user and revoke user there are e-mail notifications set.
What we are experiencing is when a user having read access is given get update access tommorrow, this user is moved from read group. And then access policy triggers, the read gets revoked then e-mail notification is sent saying user account is revoked. When added to updated group access policy triggers and create's account and e-mail notification is sent.
But here, We want to send only one e-mail saying there is an update to the user.
Any ideas, please let me know.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Just uncheck the Revoke No Longer Applies check box from the access policy.
What is happening when user remove from the Read access then as per the check box checked in access policy revoke the user account from DB and as he moved to Update access group his account getting created newly in DB.
Just uncheck the check box this prob will be solved.
Let me know if you hae any issue in the same.
Regards
Alabhay Goel

SAP BPC 10.0 Netweaver : Workstatus email notification sender is the User how to change it ?

Hi Gurus,
I've just set up email notification for Workstatus. I works fine but I've noticed something that won't be accepted by my customer :
I Had created a BPC Service User SMAIL to send email notification. But it is useless since the email notification sender is always the user who actually made the workstatus change.
This is very strange because this means that SAP can send emails IN NAME of Users. By default the email used is the user's email set up in SU01 and if the user has no email the sender mail adresse is : USERID@DEFAULTHOST
Default domain defined in SCOT transaction for SAPCONNECT.
I think that this situation raises a security breach ; to my opinion SAP should not be able to send emails in the name of users.
Do you have any idea to change this situation in order to make all notification emails send by one unique System User as BPCSERVICEMAIL for instance.
Thanks in advance for you help.
Vincent.

Hi JW,
The answer to your question #2 is that we won't have SSIS packages in BPC7NW since all SQL server based functionality won't be there in Netweaver version. If you use migration tools to migrate from BPC5.x to BPC7NW, it can convert SSIS packages. However any custom SSIS code would have to be converted manually. For more information, please read Ryan's blog at SAP's definitive strategy for planning technologies moving forward: What's the word on BPC, BI-IP and SRC?
Regards
Pravin

OIM Email Notification

I am Trying to do the Email Notification in OIM .I have specified an Instance of the mail Server,Server Name with User Login password in IT Resources Form and have Created the email definition in the Email definition form with a Request Related Type.Please suggest me whether it is the correct way to do and How to Trigger the mail......................Plesase help me as soon as possible

Hi Kevin,
Thanks for Ur Response...But still no mail is Generating ....Let me Know some things that When I create the Email definition I am Leaving the Object name and Process name blank ....that means Email will be generated for any type of resource ....but in the Process definition form I am not able to leave the Type and Object name Blank as I am not able to save that form ....Is it neccasary that I have to create Email for Provisioning process.........and Please let me know How will the Assignee will complete the process task.

OIM Email notification in Provisioning Related Type in Email Template

Hi,
I have done the Email Notification for the RequestRelated type in the EmailTemplate where a Resource is granted to a user and the mail goes to a particular User or Group in the Assignment Tab of the Process task. Its ok.
Now I want to do for the Provisioning related type specified in the Email Template.I tried to attach my Mail Template in the provisioning task related to a particular Resource but mail is not generating .
Can anyone briefly tell me How to generate mail for the Provisioning Related type ?????

Have you attached the email definition in the Notification tab of the provisioning task?
Also, you need to be sure if the task status was reached to start the email notification.
Regards,
Nitto

User based uninstall collections - Dynamic

Hi Guys,
I have been looking for sometime at how User based uninstalls are done and I see that mostly people do an Exclude on the collection and deploy an uninstall to basically everyone who DOESNT have the application deployed to them. The issue with this is
if you have a high number of apps (500 lets say) you deploy 400 either uninstall or install deployments to everyone which dramatically slows down deployment of apps on new machines etc.
With APP-V the queries are fairly straight forward and we have dynamically changing uninstall collections that only show users that have the app for them in a compliant state on a workstation in the estate, when they are fully unpublished they drop
out of the collection based on compliance state.
I am trying to achieve the same method for uninstall collections where physical installs are used. Unfortunately there isn't a class like the APP-V AppClientState for Physical apps, or from what I can see at least and just wanted to see if anyone had
achieved uninstall collection for physical apps in a more dynamic way than doing Include/Exclude on the collections which I see as very static and uneconomical.
Many thanks,
Adam

Hi Hican, Torsten,
Thanks both for your replies. below is the query i have used. I'll just be clear that this may not suit a lot of environments because of users moving around etc.
select SMS_R_USER.ResourceID,SMS_R_USER.ResourceType,SMS_R_USER.Name,SMS_R_USER.UniqueUserName,SMS_R_USER.WindowsNTDomain from SMS_R_User where uniqueusername in (select distinct SMS_G_System_SYSTEM_CONSOLE_USAGE.TopConsoleUser from SMS_G_System_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS INNER JOIN SMS_G_System_SYSTEM_CONSOLE_USAGE ON SMS_G_System_SYSTEM_CONSOLE_USAGE.ResourceID=SMS_G_System_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS.ResourceID WHERE SMS_G_System_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS.DisplayName = '<ARP DISPLAYNAME>' and TopConsoleUser not in (Select SMSID From SMS_CM_RES_COLL_XXXXXXX))
This query basically finds all workstations with a specific Display name in ARP, it then looks at the topconsoleuser in the SystemConsoleUsage class for that workstation. The User resource is then pulled back based on that username and the uninstall is deployed
to the user alongside the install.
When the machine tied to that user no longer has that software installed the user drops out of the collection. I have these collections scheduled to do an update overnight at random intervals.
You will note at the end i use a "NOT IN" clause so i can exlude specific accounts from being included in the uninstall collections. The reason for this is we have a couple of service accounts that gets used heavily in various places
and end up getting registered as the top consoleuser in some instances. This is put in as a safeguard.
the only bits in the query that change is the <DisplayName> section which is what gets added in ARP.
SMS_G_System_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS.DisplayName = '<ARP DISPLAYNAME>'
Again you need to be careful here as a program may have the same displayname as another if it hasnt been versioned correctly. in this case it may be better to use another attribute such and Product GUID.
Lastly if you choose to have an exclude collection like myself the collection Class will also need amending:
and TopConsoleUser not in (Select SMSID From SMS_CM_RES_COLL_XXXXXXX)
Somone may say there is an issue with doing it this way. obviously if users roam a lot you could end up stripping software off peoples machines which is why i say it may not suit some environments but this goes quite well where we are.
Some users may also not show if they are not yet registered as the TopConsoleUser of their workstation yet as this is a 3 month calculation (if i remember rightly). If this is being put in with a new not yet deployed app it looks clean from a returned list
of users standpoint, if however you have an estate where applications have never been unstalled and workstations have changed hands, initially you will see a lot of users in the uninstall collections which werent in the install. These applications will uninstall
for them and they will drop out of the collections.
Hican, like i said adding the software metering part in to the above query could prove even more economical as the uninstall deployment wouldn't actually be deployed if the software was active. If i get a chance i will look at this.
Hopefully the above makes sense, obviously this is just my take on how to do some uninstall collections and if somone decides to try it they are doing so at their own risk. retrofitting uninstalls is painful and risky.
Thanks,
Adam

Alert - fire email notif. with information specific to each individual

Hi,
I would like to know if a single alert can fire email to different users with information specific to each individual in the exeption list.
We might cosider the below mentioned exception list:
Column1 | Column2
Excpt1     | Emp_1_Email
Excpt2     | Emp_1_Email
Excpt3     | Emp_2_Email
Excpt4     | Emp_2_Email
Excpt5     | Emp_3_Email
Excpt6     | Emp_3_Email
In the above case, there are 2 exceptions against Emp_1, Emp_2 and Emp_3. I would like to know if we can develop a SINGLE alert which can fire email to Emp_1, Emp_2 and Emp_3 with exception information specifically against them. Or any other workaround???
Thanks,
Raghu

HI,
While defining the information-braodcasting settings (i.e. where you mention the report name, email ID of the recipent), there is an another option where you can put restrictions.
In your case you will have to create number of settings based on the number of users you have. For e.g.
create setting
1. where you have to create restricion on sapusername = 10 and email id of sapusername
2. where you have to create restricion on sapusername =11 and email id of this sapusername
Hope this will work, make sure to maintain email IDs in user profile of each user.
Regards,
Akshay

Email is quarantined for a specific user with a bypass filtering rule in place.

Hello,
I was instructed to post here for my issue by the technicians from the Office365 forum. Here is the thread from that forum. I would prefer to not have to post everything again.
http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/158/p/253629/779602.aspx#779602
Original post text:
I was recently migrated from FOPE to EOP. For the last few weeks one of my users out of 4 is not receiving a daily email from a newsletter. The other three users receive it just fine. Her's is in the quarantine and I have to release
it every morning. I have a bypass rule in for the IP address of the mail server but no change for her. I setup an individual rule for her and this domain but it is still being quarantined. I checked the report of the rule and it is being
used.

Well now the issue has been made worse. My email user did not receive the message in quarantine this morning either. The other 3 people who regularly receive the email received the email this morning.
Also I figured since I got a very fast response in the Office365 forum that I would receive the same treatment here. Is there a number that I need to call to get this issue resolved?

Junk characters in email body only for specific user IDs

While sending mail from SAP I am using
        SENDER = CL_SAPUSER_BCS=>CREATE( LV_SENDER_ADD ).
        CALL METHOD SEND_REQUEST->SET_SENDER
          EXPORTING
            I_SENDER = SENDER.
now while using 'User1' and 'User2' in LV_SENDER_ADD give a perfect result.
But while using 'User3' and 'User4' in LV_SENDER_ADD sends Junk chars in the email body
ST05 Trace Results show below mention lines in red.
hh:mm:ss:ms      Type        Lasts(us)      Object                 Text
19:05:07:451      CMOD          - - -         rstscb_call_back      Parameter:
19:05:07:451      CMOD        - - -        rstswsf_was_stor      Parameter:
19:05:07:451      CMOD             2       rstswsf_was_stor      Parameter:                          Comment:   Returncode: 0
19:05:07:451      CMOD             9      rstscb_call_back      Parameter:                          Comment:   Returncode: 0
19:05:07:451      CMOD        - - -        rscpi_init            Parameter:
(I am converting the XSF output of Smartform and SCP_TRANSLATE_CHARS to translate smartform output into HTML)
all the above four user have SAP_ALL authorization.
'user4' is created as a copy of 'user1'
Checking the Type CMOD says that they are call to 'C' routine 'kernal calls'
the above code is executed withe the user id of user1 2 3 4 and all of them give the same results.
when ever the sender is user1 or user2 the transmission is successful else. sends junk chars.

Could you tell us why/how you use SCP_TRANSLATE_CHARS?
Do theseusers have same language/country in their profile?

Email transfer between two specific users fails

The email transfer two particular user fails. O(ne is assigned to POP3 and the other one to IMAP

So from your point of view:
You get email from sender.
you open it to read.
you click on 'Reply'
Are the FROM and TO email addresses auto entered correctly?
you complete the email and click on 'Send' button.
A copy is placed in your 'Sent folder - confirm ?
you do not receive any message saying undelivered etc.
Do you have this issue with ant other email you send or is it only to that person ?
Do you get the same issue if you use 'Write' not 'Reply' and create a new message to the recipient?

Does email notification go to all users on my account?

When I turn off Find My iPhone, I get an automatic email reporting that I have turned it off.
Is this email also sent to my kids phone and wife's phone? Or is it just sent to the email (my email address) that is associated with our iPhone account?
In other words, if I turn off Find My iPhone, will the rest of the family be notified that I turned it off?

This might be a warning message coming from the email client. What email client are you using? You might want to research if there is any setting that you can use to suppress this message.

Re:OIM Email Notification

Hi Kevin,
Thanks for Ur Response...But still no mail is Generating ....Let me Know some things that When I create the Email definition I am Leaving the Object name and Process name blank ....that means Email will be generated for any type of resource ....but in the Process definition form I am not able to leave the Type and Object name Blank as I am not able to save that form ....Is it neccasary that I have to create Email for Provisioning process.........and Please let me know How will the Assignee will complete the process task.

Hi Kevin,
Thanks for Ur Response...But still no mail is Generating ....Let me Know some things that When I create the Email definition I am Leaving the Object name and Process name blank ....that means Email will be generated for any type of resource ....but in the Process definition form I am not able to leave the Type and Object name Blank as I am not able to save that form ....Is it neccasary that I have to create Email for Provisioning process.........and Please let me know How will the Assignee will complete the process task.

OIM - Email notification to a specific user based on a dynamic rule

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for