OM Position Report

Hi Team,
Can I pull a report (std or Ad hoc) with all the positions (vacant & Occupied) in an Org unit, employee ID & Name, Pers. Area, PSA, Job ID & Title & ESG for all the occupied positions?
If yes, pls. let me know step by step process.
Thanks
RL

Hi,
Try S_AHR_61016511.
For more reports follow:
Easy Access>HR>OM>Info System>Position
Cheers,
D_F

Similar Messages

  • Cash Position Report - FF7A

    Hi Friends,
    I run t-code FF7A - Cash position report with the display option 'Delta display'. The report shows the balances with balances on day 1 (for today). Subsequent days it shows without balance correctly as I need.
    Anybody faced similar problem? Appreciate your responses.
    Kalyan.

    I had posted a OSS note for the above question and SAP says that the  FF7A report with the option 'Delta display' will (that is SAP's intention) display 'with balance' in the first and last column and 'without balance' in the other columns.
    So when we run the report today we should use 'Current day minus 1' in the 'display as of ' field. so that in the second column we can see today's transactions without balance. That works for me.
    Thanks to all who replied to my posting.
    Kalyan.

  • Cash Management (Cash Position Report)

    Dear All,
    I have a Requriment of Supplier Name in Cash Position Report,
    Can Any Body Tell me how to Amend this Report to Add Supplier Name .
    Thanks

    Hi Kishor,
    Please refer help.sap.com.
    Regards
    Nitin

  • Evaluation Path for Position to Position Reporting Structure

    Hello Everyone,
    We currently have a position to position reporting structure in place.  WIth this being said, not every supervisor in our organization is the chief of a team.  I am trying to create an evaluation path that will look at a position, then go up to get the positions report to position (but not go up any further), then go down to get the positions that report to the supervisor.  This will allow us to start with a position, then return all the positions that the report to position has.  In essence this will allow us to start with a position and get the team (though we don't have an org unit for the team).  I am trying to do this for the Team Calendar in ESS. 
    Below is what I have.  The problem is with the depth, if I enter a 2, then it is not getting the lateral positions, but if I enter a 3, then it goes up to another level and gets an additional supervisor (which I do not want).
    S     A     002     Reports (line) to     2     S
    S     B     002     Is line supervisor of     1     S
    S     A     008     Holder     3     P
    Has anyone developed and Evaluation Path that does this (gets a positions team without having an org unit) and can offer assistance?
    Best Regards,
    Scott

    My first suggestion was either use Bottoms-up approach or top-down dont use both..like either use either of below
    S A 002 Reports (line) or
    S B 002 Is line supervisor
    but figured u will still have depth issues..so therefore
    you cld experiment like below..i understood your requirement, and i am suggesting this totally off-hand thats on top of my head..as i said experiement doing this way..
    say you have four levels  why dont you use different evalutaion path to link them between each level..
    say 1st to 2nd (reports to A002)
          2nd to 3rd (subordinate to A005)
          3rd to 4th/4th to 3rd (Is line supervisor B 002 )etc
    this way you will not have the depth issue as each one is diffeent Ev path..
    ...oops i can see people laughing at this solution..but well..i tried!

  • Internal order + Inv.program position report

    Hi experts,
    we are using internal order as invest.measures for inv. program structure.
    can you please help me with finding a standart report for internal orders, where I can find this assignment invest.program position?
    In KO03 it is field RAIP1-POSID (Position ID fo inv.program) I tried KOK3, KOB1, KOB2, but this field is not there. Is it possible to integrate these fields in the output listIs via customizing?
    The only report is in IM (IMR1) but this is a hierarchical display (not suitable for excel exporting)
    thanks you for your effort.
    Pablo

    Hi, you can add this field in kob1, check note 325546

  • Vacant Position Report

    Fellows
    I've got an Org. Structure containing Org. Units, Positions and Holders of Positions.
    Some Position are currently vacant, some are occupied and were vacant before.
    So now I'm creating a report of Vacant Positions. When I put the Reporting Key date as current date, the report brings the correct output of currently unoccupied Positions.
    When I put a date that is old and contains periods where some Positions were unoccupied, those Positions appear on the report as unoccupied and the vacant from/to column show the date that the Position was created.
    Assistance please.

    Yes I'm using the SAP Standard Report : S_AHR_61015516.
    I don't want to maintain Infotype 1007. I want it to be done automatically by the system in background.
    And depending on the Key date that I put in, when running this report I want to see specific period
    that the Position was vacant.
    Example:  I hire a Person on 01.09.2009 and Terminate/Fire the Person on 05.09.2009, then
                    Rehire him on 01.10.2009.
                    When I put the Key Date as 04.09.2009, I want the Vacant from/to column to show me that
                    this Person was Vacant on 06.09.2009 - 30.09.2009. 
                   And Staffing Status column show Occupied since 01.10.2009

  • Holder of two positions, reporting to multiple managers in Travel managemen

    Dear Consultants,
    Our configuration is as follows:
    We have implemented Travel Management in our organization.
    A Person is assigned %70 capacity of  Position A, and is assigned %30 capacity of  Position B.
    Position A is reporting to Position X and Position B is reporting to Positon Y.
    i.e. , Position A and Positon B are reporting to seperate positions.
    My question is:
    According to our travel management workflow logic , if the holder of the shared position applies for a travel request, The approval of the travel request should go to Position X ( The position which is heading Position A ) Obviously because our employee is holding %70 of position A, and is primarily reporting to position X.
    Now, we checked the workflow, and it's working fine from R/3 , however, the Enterprise portal is showing Position Y as the position which should approve the travel request.
    Thanks !

    Generally
    Even thogh if he is haveing many approver the  request will go and have to go to that manager in which the Position where his working percentage is more
    Ex: X employee is working for three projects  A B C  for A 25 % B 25%  C 50% so the approve shd go to C  project manager
    are u doing this with the help of the work flow please let us know
    might be useful iam not sure jsut want to share

  • Cash Positions report FF7A not showing any values

    Hi,
    Can someone help on why none of the Tresury Transactions are reflected in FF7A report?  I have done all the configuration setting under TM-Gen Settings-Link to Cash Management-Assign Planning Levels for all the Prod Types.
    Under FDFD Cash Mgmnt is active for the Co code.
    Under OT05 Cash positions is ticked for both BNK and PSK.
    Under OT12 respective treasury planning levels are assigned to PSK.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Suhas

    Dear Mahesh,
    Thanks so much.  Its working now.  Earlier I had this setting for planning levels at prod type and act category level but was not working then.  I did this once again and re looked at settings.
    Created TRM source sybol separately
    Defined Pl levels to Source Symbols
    Defined new Grouping for Treasury as TRM &
    in Maintain Structure added E for ++ and G for ++++++++++
    Best Wishes & Regards,
    Suhas

  • One position reporting to more than one position in other org unit

    Hi Experts,
    How to map in SAP if One position is reporting to more than one position in other org unit. plz explain me the in detail.
    Regards,
    Saumya Chawan.

    Hi Saumya,
    First you have to decide on the relationships you want for this position.  The question is - who will decide pay increases for this position?...who will approve vacation time?  That manager is the one who is the directly managing the position and so the position must be in the org structure for that manager's org unit. 
    Second, what is the relationship to the other manager?  This is usually a "dotted-line" or functional reporting relationship to another position.  You can use a standard relationship such as 005 or create your own. 
    Then you can use the Matrix to create the two relationships.  Easy Access:  Human Resources --> Organizational Managment --> Organizational Plan --> Matrix (transaction PPME).  Use the "Standard selection" and create the two relationships between the position and the org unit and other position (or other object depending on your requirement). 
    Paul

  • Positions reporting to Mutiple positions

    hi ,
    i have a scenario where in the Reporting structure
    A position is reporting to multiple positions , how to maintain this in OM ?
    kindly reply
    regards
    hr_user

    Hi
    Sorry Gupta, I think A012 relationship is only to make a position as a Chief Hat position and this is basically between a position and Org, Unit. Not to maintain the position to position relationship.
    My suggestion is to maintain the position to position relationship.
    Note: Please take in to consideration multiple  relationship structure if you have workflows.
    Thanks
    Sheetal

  • A positive report (so far)

    I have been a long time Premiere user (version 3, yes 3, not CS3 onward) and have been generally pleased with the overall experience. I also was being a bit of a bug about the subscription idea (too many bad experiences with the likes of Auto Desk and the ilk) and I found the idea of being forced to upgrade as versions came out or face an ever increasing upgrade fee distasteful. I have Master Collection and that is not inconsequential to do. Well after cooling my jets and actually looking at the Creative Cloud offer, I upgraded (at a very reasonable cost). Being on a continual upgrade path is nice as well.
    Positive Point One: Upgrade model is friendly
    Additionally since the version 6 Premiere I have dearly missed hearing audio in the trim monitor. When I complained I received overwhelming silence. Adobe suggested a feature request and the community said "maybe that was useful, I've never really needed that, what do you use that for". My work flow. Timeline, fast forward looking for breaks and mark them, goto top and use shortcuts to advance to next marker, cut. Go to top, open Trim Monitor and advance through, quickly ripple and rock-n-roll through cut points (listening to audio as well as looking at picture to find the rough cuts)
    IT'S BACK!!! Audio in the trim mode . Additionally now material on different tracks trim just fine. No advancing along and skipping chunks on different tracks (I lift material to higher tracks for a quick sorting method. ie. Track 1 probably not useful, Track 2: potential use, Track 3 Primary Use)
    Also the new trim modes (which being a long time premiere editor, I am not that used to yet) appear to have great value.
    Positive Point Two: Trimming much improved
    So after complaining, I offer a Thank You to Adobe. And of course all the goodness all over the place, both Premiere and other apps make me giddy.
    Kevin L

    Agreed. I have been using it since CS3, coming from Avid, Velocity & FCP. It simply gets better with each new revision, but CS6 feels like they've really hit it hard. The overall user experience feels faster and more intuitive. For me, it's almost a nebulous thing, but it just feels better, for whatever that's worth.
    I've currently been comparing CS6 to Smoke 2013 (doing the same project in parallel) and I keep coming back to CS6. While I would prefer nodal compositing (I come from a Nuke/Fusion bknd), the CS6 suite is much snappier. Disk caching in AE it a huge help, and Dynamic link (while in need of a few tweaks, feature-wise) is still a great feature. Granted, Smoke is in Alpha/Beta, but I'd take the Pepsi Challenge anyday with the CS6 suite over Smoke.
    -mike

  • Report for Positions by Trader in Securities

    Hi,
    I searched for various reports but could not find an option to select Trader in order to generate a report for positions (or journal/transactions/cash flows) in Securities.
    I need a report in Securities which should have a selection for Trader and Portfolio fields among others (similar to TPM20). Is there a way in the standard SAP reports?
    Thanks in advance,
    Durga.

    Hi,
    For securities, position management is supported at maximum against ID, Security Account/Portfolio/Fund and Gen Val Class   (Fund from EhP4 onwards).
    Trader field is not a key figure where you can get accumulated position report.
    If you wish to maintain trader wise position, the possible way out will be to map Gen Val Class or Portfolio one to one with Trader. Or develop a customized position report considering trader into consideration but condition/corporate action flows will not be under control as clarified by Ravi. Look for a customer exit code to call Trader in that case.
    Regards
    Prasad AV

  • Reporting structure between two positions as vise versa

    Hi,
    Two positions for eg. AGM (A002 relationship) reporting to Deputy MG and Deputy MG (A002 relationship) reporting to AGM..as per my knowledge reporting structure between two posiitions is maintained with two different relationships i.e A002 and B002 relationship ie.if one relationship is maintained another is automatically maintained...is it possible to maintain two positions reporting to each other (A002)...Please help ASAP.....!!
    Thanks

    Hi Sonu,
    You are asking abt a inverse relationship and yes A/B002 will do that
    say AGM is the higger position and DGM is the lower so when DGM reporting to AGM it will be A/002 and when AGM reports to DGM then it will be B/002
    So always the higher position is taken as A and lower is B.
    Hope this clarifies ur issue.
    Thanks
    Swati

  • Reporting relationship of people when a managing position has many holders

    Hi experts,
    SAP OM and PM allows multiple holders of a position. I have 2 questions about that actually:
    1. Is it common in implementation to have more than 1 holders for a position?
    2. usually, a position reports to the managing position of its org. unit. If the managing position has multiple holders, how can we know who reports to whom? any other configurations solve this issue?
    3. Similar problem happens when an org.unit has more than 1 managing position. But that can be solved by S-S relationship.
    Thanks a lot.
    Regards,
    Alex

    Hi,
    I agree 100% with Dilek.
    Alex, from your question i can tell that you're aware that with regards to "relationships" P is just a holder S, thus inherits all position's attributes, meaning if a person1 holding positionX that reports to a positionY having holders(person2 and person3) it basically means that person1 reports to both person2&3 and vice-versa.
    So to make your situation less complex, use Dilek's advice as it will make others things(i.e. workflow, cost distributions etc) easier to do and maintain henceforth.
    I hope you manage to fix it.
    Kind Regards,
    Gosiame.T

  • Reports to check what org units or positions linked

    Hi,
    I want to run a report for 2000 positions and check
    which positions are linked with which other positions
    and which positions are linked with what other

    hi,
    sap provide the two types of relationship for a objects ,
    A -
    BOTTOM  TOP
    B----
    TOP  DOWN
    for position to position  ( A position reported to another position  A|002 where 'A' is bottom up relation and 002 is infotype ( reports line to ) 
    position is the line manager of another position  B| 002 where the 'B' is top down relation and 002 is infotype .
    position manages an org unit  A |012
    an org unit is managed by position B|012
    report is HRP1001,
    RupaPrasad

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to translate text on a page into actual data on another page?

    I would like to translate (parse and replace) the words that are on one page into their actual values on another page. These words are in a text area box that are displayed as the following:  [[type name]] and [[start date]].  Again, I'm trying to sh

  • PA30 - Maintain HR Master Data - ITAB_DUPLICATE_KEY shoprt dump

    Hello, when I run PA30 transaction I immediately receive short dump ITAB_DUPLICATE_KEY with info as follows: What happened?     Error in ABAP application program.     The current ABAP program "SAPLHRBAS00GENERICSELECTION" had to be terminated      be

  • About JavaScript and LiveCycle Designer generally

    Conditional statements have to get structure strictly, i. e. else has to followed after if. Never without, otherwise you will get confused solution!

  • InDesign Cs4 Bleed/Slug not scaling with reduced print?

    Maybe I'm crazy, but I feel certain that when I've printed my layouts in the past, Indesign scaled the bleed and slug along with the rest of the page when I printed at a reduced size. Today, I can't get the bleed or the slug to output in relative sca

  • Authorization Check exist in BAPI for Transaction

    Hi, I am using the standard BAPIs for Costcenter create, change and profitcenter change. Will these std BAPIs perform authority check for specific transaction with respect to the actions performed(KS01-CC create, KS02-CC Change, KE52-PC change)? Than