On hold if outside payment terms

Hi all,
In B1 its possible to activate a system that alerts if BP is over credit or commitment limit.
What my cust needs is a system that sets the BP to 'on hold' if the BP is outside payment terms.
So if there are any open invoices that are overdue or outside pay terms for this BP...
Are there any queries in existance that would make this possible.
I suppose this would be a type of update query....
All thoughts appreciated.
Thanks,
John

John,
Marking the Customer to be ON HOLD automatically when they exceed Credit limit is not possible through the system. As Raghu has pointed using the Credit Limit and Commitment limit checks and having approval procedures in place for validating document exceeding credit limits would be a good alternative.
Admin > System Init > General Settings > BP Tab ...Set the Customer Activity Restrictions
Check Credit Limit and Commitment Limit and select the documents to validate

Similar Messages

Block Sales Docs based on payment terms

How can we block the sales documents for a customer who has not paid within the given due date based on the payment terms?
Thanks and regards,
Bharath S

Hi Bharath,
Use the stored procedure to acheive your requirement and also check the thread
On hold if outside payment terms
*Close the thread if issue solved.
Regards
Jambulingam.P

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

Dear Friends,
In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
Regards
Shammi

Payment terms in Credit Memo

Hi Experts
This refers to credit memo to vendors thru FB65.The vendor master has payment terms populated which gets carried forward in case of a credit memo.
The solution of entering a "credit memo" payment terms in the vendor master has been explored but has been put on hold for practical reasons and making changes to already existing vendor masters.
Is there a solution whereby,at transaction level, the system takes a separate payment term during credit memo other than the invoice payment term.
We are on 4.7 EE version
I tried to check out substitutions - but the payment term is not a substitutable field in OBBH.
The main idea is that we do not want to disturb the vendor masters and get a solution at transaction level
Any thought or workaround will be much appreciated.
Regards
Swami

Hi Srikanth,
As you perfectly mentioned,field ZTERM is not allowed to use for substitution in standard: take a look to table GB01.
The entry is excluded. If in your system is not excluded you used a modification. Note 42615 explains which fields can be substituted.
Pmnt terms work in the following way for credit memos:
1. if 'V' is entered in field 'invoice reference', due date is calculated the same way as for an invoice.(this means you also
have to enter the terms of payment in field bseg-zterm. With entry 'V' you only indicate that the due date of the credit memo is not identical to the payment period base date, if you have entered a special terms of payment in the document)
2. If credit memo refers to an invoice, you can enter invoice details in field bseg-rebzg (invoice ref.)so that credit memo will pick up same payment terms as invoice.
3. if '*' is entered in field 'paymnt terms' then the payment terms are picked up from customer/vendor master record.
Hope the explanation is helpful to you.
Best regards,
AZ

To know about holdback/retainage payment term

to know about holdback/retainage payment term configuration/control parameters to set in customer/vendor master records.

HI Anand,
Hold back/retainage/installment payment terms are defined in T.code OBB9.
First create payment terms in Obb8 t.code and you combine/bind them into a hold back term in OBB9 T.code.
You assign these payment terms in the customer/vendor master record.(payment transactions in CC data)
you can always overwrite these payment terms at the time of posting the invoices.
Regards
Aravind
Assign points if useful

Modifying Payment terms in AR Invoice

Hi Experts,
Is there a way we can modify the payment terms in an AR invoice that comes from PA. I am talking about the Transactions screen of Receivables.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
SA

Paying Methodology from GOP and Democrats
Hi All
As we know USA and outside nations work on Software Development, Service Oriented Architecture and ERP/EBUSINESS Solutions and Model Driven Solutions and WebLogic Oracle Fusion Softwares. Lot of good optimization scope for services and Messaging.To help USA Govt to cut down costs.. Cant Help it since Americans also want to work on database design.
How are payment terms looking in Oracle Ebusiness AR Module.
What Obama And Harry Reid Nancy Pelosi and John Boehner and John Kline and Schumer and Democrats and GOP are talking about:
PAYMENT TERM SITUATION::::Whats Happening:::: I just compiled outcome and sending you for just update.
In this week :
GOP and democrats are discussing about Payment Laws and Payment Terms::
1) Payment Term Created Date
2) Payment Term Validity Period
3) Payment Term Automatic Expiration Indicator
4) Payment Term Aggrement Reference Number
5) Payment Term Initial Threshold Value
6) Payment Term Start Date
7) Payment Term End Date
8) Payment Term Requires Management Approval Indicator Workflow
9) Payment Term Status : new status value to be added : AUTOMATIC EXPIRED By DEC 31st 2010
Every country has declared partnership with USA. So USA recognizes their partners.
Cheers
Maneesh Innani
Technical Manager and can help

Cust sends EDI with incorrect payment terms

Hello SAP Gurus-
Do controls exists in SAP ECC 6.0 that will place orders on hold once customer sends order via EDI with incorrect payment terms? We have situations where customer is remitting EDI with net 45 and in customer master the payment terms are net 60.
They are going through the system and we don't know how to stop them. What can we do to control this? We would like the order to go on hold so that we can manage without the orders print and shipping. Is this a configuration change? If so, where?
Thank you!!

Hi,
In your payment Terms configuration, you need to enter 11 in discount percentage 2 as blank and discount days 2 as 11. Then system will not calculate discount from the 11th day. If you dont enter then system will populate the discount even after the discount date is over.
Hope this helps
Regards
Mahendra

Web Tools Payment terms default

Hello experts,
I have set my default Payment terms to 3 payments for all customers. First payment right away at 50% followed by 25% the next month, and 25% third month. Will webtools authorize the total amount when the order is processed? If so how can i configure web tools to handle this sort of payment.
Thank you!
Points will be awarded accordingly.

Web tools is not a payment processor or an automated payment system(just a web site that synchs with b1) so within the scope of the product your options are quite limited. Web tools only communicates with a payment gateway when the merchant places an internal order for a customer or the customer places the order themselves.
I can't see how this would work. The shopper has to initiate the authorization of funds and banks only typically hold an authorization for a week or so, certainly not 3 months. So if you did an authorization for the entire amount, but only captured 50% the first month the authorization for the entire amount would expire by the time you went to capture the remaining amounts.
Maybe I'm missing something?

Issue with Idoc when creating invoice taking wrong payment term

Hi All,
My Requirement is invoices created through B2B interface should hold the payment term of purchasing party instead of invoicing party
400021 is Invoicing party having payment term 2000 i.e. 20 days
414478 is the Purchasing party having the payment term 1000 ie 10 days
So invoice should hold the payment term 10 days instead of 20 days
I have an IDOC which is creating Invoice, I am trying to reprocess the IDOC to see the issue but could not able to achieve the solution.
Please help me out which approach should i follow to achieve the solution of this issue.
Thanks,
VB

Hi,
Try using E1EDK18 segment. Put "Number of days" ,Qualifier and check if this achievs the desired result or not? If yes then you have to use an user exit to put the number of days in the IDOC.
Cheers,

Payment Terms configuration

Dear Friends,
I have 2 queries -
1. Can we configured the Payment Terms which will enable while invoicing to create the multiple line item while Invoice Posting ( accounting entry ) say, while doing MIRO / FB60 transaction. And one of those would go to Special GL. e.g. we have to deduct the Retention Money @ 5% from Invoice Amount and we are using one of Special GL for Retention money so can i configure the Payment Term as -
1. 95% -
60 Days
2. 5% -
365 Days
So here 2 ( 5% ) will be posted as Special GL item while Invoice Entry.
( Currently we are transferring those entries to special gl manually using T code - F-02 from Vendor Open items )
2. We have configured the number of Payment Terms but sometimes negotiated Terms does fall into the category of existing Payment Terms and it is not possible to create the Payment Terms for such requirement. So can we configure one Payment Term which will be editable while Purchase ORder Creation or Invoicing ( like payment term with "OTHERS" would be created and initially it would be configured for 0 Days and those would be edited while making Purchase Order as per requirement.
Since this is affecting our Ageing Analysis and Payment Due Report as both are based on Payment Terms in PO.
If anyone has solution pls suggest the way to do it . will assign full marks if gets solution.
Thanks in advance.
PS

Hi
I think we can't maintain cash discounts more than two %.
Goto OBB8, choose account type customer/vendor.
goto payment terms segment. 1) 3% days 0 2) 2% days 15.
3) we can enter %, only days. it means no cash discount.
Regards,
Chandra

Getting split payment terms in case of customer credit memo(Doc type DG)

Hi Guys,
Is there any FM available for getting split payment terms in case of customer credit memo(Document type DG). There will be no invoice/billing doc for this document type and will be created from FB75 transaction. For billing document i am using FM SD_PRINT_TERMS_OF_PAYMENT_SPLI. Please let me know if there is any FM for accounting document also.
Thanks,
Vinod.

Hi,
Try this bapi
BAPI_AR_ACC_GETSTATEMENT

The payment terms are not getting reflected in PO

Hi,
We are in SRM5.0 Extended Classic scenario.
We have created new payment term in ECC and transferred to SRM using BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS and after tranferring it to SRM I am able to see the new payment term in table BBP_PAYTERM and BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT in SRM system.
But non of the payment terms are not reflecting into PO. We are not getting any errors while processing the PO.
Could you please suggest what may be the issue here.
Best Regards,
Siddappa

Hello Siddappa,
I am a little confused here with the scenario.
I understand that the payment terms are recenly created and replicated. So naturally they would have been updated in the relevant vendor master as well. Now has the vendor master been replicated to SRM from ECC once the payment terms were updated.
So from what you have mentioned "When we check the BBP_PD, the payment term is reflecting for the POs created after shopping cart approval."
So does this mean once the SC is approved then the PO is created and then the Terms of Payment are seen in the PO.
However "If the PO created through describe requirement, the Vendor will not assigned the PO created will go to Held status and buyer will process the order."
So does this mean since the Vendor is not mentioned the Terms of Payment is not being reflected and will happen only once the same is specified in the PO.
I have a question on whether after replicating the Payment Terms, has it been seen in any of the PO's created so far or it is always blank.
Regards
Pramod

How to get vendor payment terms

Hi all,
I am creating a report. I need to get vendor payment terms. There are invoices without PO, how can I retrieve the payment terms for those cases.
Thanks.

Hi nene
in case of invoice without PO, The payment term will be selected from the vendor master data (in View : payment terms transaction in XK03).
Check payment term in master data is exist or not.
the data is in the table LFB1 : Field ZTERM
Regards
Wiboon

Vendor Payment Terms

Hi All
Is there a report that can give me the Vendor Payment terms
Vishnu

Hi Vishnu,
go to SE16 , enter table name LFM1. in display parameters select ZTERM
Regards
Mangesh.

On hold if outside payment terms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for