On-line funds checking with respect to project budgets

Hi Friends,
Does Purchasing check, in addition to available funds in GL, the funds available in a project if at PO level, the project number is set up and an expenditure type is attached and a Project Budget is setup for the expenditure type.
What are the setups involved?
How does one specify at the project budget level whether the budget checking, if possible, will be absolute and advisory.
Thanks and regards
null

Oracle Projects is not designed to support budgetary control for Purchasing and Payables.
This is an enhancement Oracle is planning to deliver on one of the next releases, on top of 11i. Unformally scheduled for the second half of year 2001.
Dina

Similar Messages

Authorization with respect to Project profile

Dear All
i have one problem pl suggest me
I'm implementing one project ... i'm in authorization matrix i need to give the authorization with respect to Project profile
Ex . one controlling area
        two company code
        ten project profile
each profile have different responsible person (some time five to six person are in single project)
In one plant they are using six different project profile .this my concertino
now i need to control the authorization with respect to Project profile .i'm not able to find the any object in the authorization matrix . pl suggest me . if know the technical object name pl suggest me

You can use the following objects for controlling authorisations:
Co Area
Cost Center
Profit Center
Project Manager
Project Type
I don not believe there is an auth object for Project Profile.   If you have a 1 : 1 relationship between your project profile and project type, than it would be possible to use this to secure authorisations.
C_PRPS_ART.
I hope this helps.
Ian

Budget checking with respect to BOM

Hi,
Could you please let me know whether budget checking can be done with respect to BOM? If there is any standard procedure could you please let me know? Also if there is no standard procedure, then could you please tell me what can be the customization?
Thank You

Dear Souvik,
Budgeting can be carried out on WBS elements
when budgeting is carried AVAC (availability control is activated)which check the costs and restrict it if it is exceeding the available budget value
when you assign the material or service (in your case as composite material or BOM) the cost of the same is considered while creation of PR or PO for that particular material.and thus check is available
to particularly control only one single BOM or continuous process of procurement of material you can create a WBS element as BOM and create a internal or dummy activity against which material shall be assigned for procurement in future.
carry out the budgeting process for WBS BOM (CJ30-->CJ32)and hence checking could be done on day to day basis,by system itself.
hope this shall help you

Actual data is not populated in Budget Fund Check Results for Project Budge

Dear All,
Please help me with the following issue:
1) Create Project Budget integrated to GL Budget (Top Down Integration for encumbrance).
2) Enter Time Sheets through pre-approved batches (we are aware fund check will happen only for Requisition, PO & Supplier Invoices and not for other transactions).
3) Now Actual Cost is updated for the time sheet entered in point number (2) in Expenditure Inquiry & PSI.
4) But the same Actual Cost is not updated in Budget Fund Check Results window (hence funds available is not updated). Navagation: Projects implementation Super User Responsibility
Budget> History> Tools >View Fund Check Results
Please provide us solution why Actual Cost is not updated at Fund check Results window because of this there is a huge impact on funds available.

Hi,
Please check the below for more help
http://www.ncoaug.org/archives/ncoaug_20070613/presentations/2002-Aug/Projects_Koziski.ppt
Rgds
Raghu

Production Order Settlement Process with respect to a Project

Hello All,
I know about normal Production Order Settlement Process in discrete industries.
Can anyone give me the steps for the Production Order Settlement Process if the Production Order is created with respect to a Project in SAP PP- PS Integration Scenario.
Thanks in advance for your support.

Hi Experts,
Can anyone clarify my above queries.
Thanks in advance for your support

The project could not be created,please check the webroot folder(it may overlap with an existing project)

Error msg: "The project could not be created, please check
the webroot folder (it may overlap with an existing project)." This
occurs in the CF/Flex Application Wizard Pproject Information
Window on a Flex3 application. I checked to make sure that there
were no overlapping applications and the message still persists.
There are old threads on this from Flex 2 but the problem still
exists in newly released Flex 3. Please help!

I can't help you with this, but you are not alone. A friend
of mine has exactly the same problem

I submitted my podcast and I got an email saying error, I checked with the feed validator and got this message: This feed does not validate. line 40, column 6: Undefined item element: itunes:order, how do sort this out, someone help me please.

I submitted my podcast and I got an email saying error, I checked with the feed validator and got this message: This feed does not validate. line 40, column 6: Undefined item element: itunes:order, how do sort this out, someone help me please.

Ignore it. 'itunes:order' is a recent addition which FeedValidator doesn't know about. If your podcast is rejected that is unlikely to be the reason. Of course as you haven't posted the feed URL nor the text of the error message I can't make any further comment.

Inner join and select for all entries with respect to performance

Hi Friends,
I just want to know which is more efficient with respect to performance the Inner join or select for all entries?which is more efficient? and how? can you explain me in detail ?
Regards,
Dinesh

INNER JOIN->
The data that can be selected with a view depends primarily on whether the view implements an inner join or an outer join. With an inner join, you only get the records of the cross-product for which there is an entry in all tables used in the view. With an outer join, records are also selected for which there is no entry in some of the tables used in the view.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/cf/21ec77446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
FOR ALL ENTRIES->
Outer join can be created using this addition to the where clause in a select statement. It speeds up the performance tremendously, but the cons of using this variation are listed below
Duplicates are automatically removed from the resulting data set. Hence care should be taken that the unique key of the detail line items should be given in the select statement.
If the table on which the For All Entries IN clause is based is empty, all rows are selected into the destination table. Hence it is advisable to check before-hand that the first table is not empty.
If the table on which the For All Entries IN clause is based is very large, the performance will go down instead of improving. Hence attempt should be made to keep the table size to a moderate level.
Not Recommended
Loop at int_cntry.
Select single * from zfligh into int_fligh
where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.
Append int_fligh.
Endloop.
Recommended
Select * from zfligh appending table int_fligh
For all entries in int_cntry
Where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.

Availablity check with ATP logic

Hi everybody
Can any one tell me where where we assign Checking rule (A - sales order) in availablity check.

dear srikanth
please gothough this
TOR AND AVAILANBILITY CHECK
To confirm the quantities for a particular line item in the sales order on particular day system carried out transfer of requirements (TOR) & AVAILABILITY check, so has to confirm the quantity on particular day as system should know what are there requirement of the sale order and delivery with MRP then system carries out availability check function, to confirm the quantity on particular day. Depending upon the IMG setting system carries out availability check function based on 3 methods:
A) Availability Check with ATP logic or against planning:
In ATP logic systems ATP Qty while carrying out availability check function for
Particular line item (ATP qty=warehouse stock +planned receipts planned issues)
Planned Receipts: EX: - purchase requisitions, purchase orders, stock in transfer stock at inspection etc.
Planned Issues: - EX: - open sales order & open delivers
B) Availability check against product allocation:
Availability check can be carried out against product allocations in which system automatically restrict the user to confirm the quantity beyond reserved quantities per particular customer. EX:- Availability qty =100, existing orders=10,then system automatically distributes to items evenly to the sales order.
C) Rule based Availability check:
Rule based availability check can be carried out based on the business transaction.
EX: - For normal sales order system has to carry out availability check for special sales order ex: - cash sales and rush order systems need not to be carry out availability check,
In rule based availability check system in which system carried out Global availability to promise in all plants. In this check system transfers the requirements to APO system where GATP takes place and the result of the availability check transferred to R/3 system. This process takes place with the transaction code CIF(central inter face) inR/3.After carrying out availability check function system proposes(by using ATP logic) default values of ATP check result to the user in a dialog box, in which system gives the choice to the user to take the decision in contest of insufficient stock.
a) One time delivery:
If the user chooses one time delivery and the order Quantity is 100 units system confirms 50 units then systems automatically confirms as a zero. If the user saves the document with the zero confirm qty then system   trace the sales order as aback order (V_RA), which can be confirmed later by RESCHEDULLING (V_V2).
b) Complete Delivery:
If order Qty=100, Availability stock = 50, system says that remaining can be given after one week. Then if the user selects this option then system push up existing confirmed qty to after one week and the total qty can be confirmed after one week only.
c) Delivery Proposal:
If order qty=100, system confirms 50, and remaining 50 can be confirmed after one week. If the user chooses this option then system confirms 50 Qty today allows the user to delivery 50 quantities today remaining 50 can be delivered after one week.
CONFIGURATION SETTINGS FOR TOR:
Define Requirement Class:
Path: Img  S&D  Basic functions  Availability Check & Transfer of requirements  Transfer of requirements    Define Requirement classes
Requirement classes control MRP, Requirement consumption, strategy, relevance for planned. It specifics whether the availability check & TOR to be Called out for transactions. Ex: Sales Order
It determines whether requirements relevant for MRP or not, the allocation indicator from the sales view which controls the settlement of customers requirements with planned independent requirements. It determines the item b to be settled as an availability heck. Assignment, the settlement profiles the results analysis key. The TOR and Availability check functions are globally controlled using the requirement class for all the Sales documents. The values from the Requirements class are transferred to scheduled the of the sales documents class are transferred to scheduled the of the sales document default values and can be over written there.
Define Requirements Classes:
Requirement class defines whether the system has to carry out availability check based on the STP Qty. Ex:
Define Requirement Types:
Here we define requirement type, Ex: and Assign to Requirement class that we defined in the promote step.
Determination of Requirement types using Transaction:
Requirement type is going to be determined for sales document by following a search strategy. .
First System checks strategy group in MRP3 view if it trend requirement type then system takes from it, otherwise.
It will go to MRP group in MRP1 view, otherwise
It will check to Material type, otherwise
It will go to item Category + MRP type, otherwise
It will go to Item category only, otherwise
Finally system determines the transaction b not relevant for TOR & Availability check.
Choose Item category TAN+MRP type PD=Requirement type =0
Define Procedure for each schedule the category:
Here we define respective schedule the category of the sales documents, whether an availability check and TOR should be carried out. This setting is relevant for sales documents only. It is fine tuning of availability check for sales documents TOR & Availability check function    can be activated at sales order level those are proposed in to schedule line category level. If u wants to deactivate TOR availability check function at schedule the category level and want to deactivate at requirement class level it b impossible.
Ex: If u wants to check availability w/o transferring the requirement we can use it.
Choose schedule line category CP & Activate Availability check, requirement & Product Allocation
Block Quantity confirmation in delivery Blocks:-
When we transfer requirements to MRP then confirmed quantities is also reserved for confirmed sales documents, if transaction is blocked for delivery the reserved quantities are also blocked so that the conformed quantities cannot be used by any other purpose. So has to avoid this situation we can block the transfer of requirements(TOR) for delivery blocks, in this case requirements transferred to MRP but will not be reserved, that will be cleared once we save the documents then system shows confirmed qty as zero.
When we remove the delivery block then system automatically carries out availability check & confirms the qty.
A) Deliveries: Blocking region for sales Area:
     Here we define blocking regions for TOR ex:-credit limits
B) Reasons for scope of delivery blocks: TOR. Block:
Ex: - 01 credit limits-check confirmation block.
Maintain Requirements for TOR:-
Here we can define our own requirement with the help of ABAPer for TOR
Ex: - a) 102- prevent reservation in the event of credit block
       b) 102-purchase requisitions.
System doesnt create purchase requisitions for sales order line items if it has a credit limit.
Availability check:
Configuration setting:-
Availability check with ATP logic or against planning:-
A) Define checking group:
Checking group defines what kind of requirement record system use to create when sales order & deliveries are processed for this material. We can create 2 kinds of requirements records
Individual requirement records: that means system creates requirement record for each S&D document.
Summarized requirement Records: That means system creates requirement records under certain condition in the material master record. There are 2 type of summarized requirement record:
Summarized requirement records for each day.
Summarized requirement records for each week
Define checking Action;
Here we define     01- daily requirement      -B                                        02- Individual requirements -A
Where      B-total record per day
     A-single record per day
B) Define material Block for other users:
When 2 users tries to confirm the quantities for the sales order for same material at a time system will be confused to confirm the quantities both sales orders. So has to avoid this kind of situation we can block the materials from confirming the quantities for 2 users at a check, check block
C) Define checking group default values:
Checking group is going to be determined depending upon the material type & plant.
-Go to new entries, specify material type, ex;-FERT
& plant = checking group of availability check: 02
D) Carry out for Availability check:
Here we define checking rule for the Availability check & allocate them to the checking group. The checking rules specify the scope of the availability check. For a respective transaction, means which planned receipts & planned issues systems has to taken into consideration and also it determines whether system has to take RLT into consideration.
*Select checking group of availability check-02, checking rule=01
*Go to details icon, & check which planned receipts & planned issues system has taken into consideration for availability check
*save it, exit.
E) Define procedure by Requirement class:
Here we define requirement class whether on availability check & TOR should be carried out the setting that we carries out at requirement class level they are at global level. There settings automatically copied into define from of requirement class and vice versa.
*Choose requirement class: 041 & check availability check & TOR (requirement)
F) Define procedure for each schedule line category:
Here we carry out fine tuning setting for availability check at schedule line category level. Here we define whether system has to carry out Availability check for particular transaction.
Ex: - if we want to implement availability check w/o TOR for a particular transaction. According to settings at requirement class level TOR & availability check function activate & those setting will be copied into the schedule time category by default, so that at schedule line category level we deactivated TOR
G) Determine procedure for each Delivery Item category:
Here we switch on or switch off availability check functions of a delivery item category
*choose item category TAN. & specify the appropriate value.
H) Checking group for updating back orders:
Here we assign checking group to a plant that rule specifies for individual application, according to which the availability check is carried out;
I) Define Default settings:
Here we define the result of the availability check.
*Choose your sales Area, & check fixed dates& Qty options & specify D or E
Where: D- Dialog box in the case of shortages (one time delivery)
E- Dialog box in the shortages (delivery proposal).
rewards if it helps
siva

Error in migo posting with respect to sch agreement

Hi
I created a purchse requisition and also a sch agreement with respect to it and maintained delivery scheduled.
PR item qty=10
sch delivery=2 4 4 i.e.equal to 10
but when i post GR with respect to this it gives error as follows
PU Ordered quantity exceeded by 2 KG
what can be possible reason.
Thnx

Hi,
Please check the SA - Schedule lines & also the Purchase document history to confirm the total order as well as GR quantity.
Also Please check the Purchase Order unit & Base unit of measure for the material.
Thanks & Regards,

Duplicate GR Posting Control With Respect to MIGO Filed Delivery Note

Hi Team,
Is there any possiblity to check / control GR Posting with respect to the same PO and same delivery note reference.
I have a PO 1000001 with line item 10 with qty 100. I did a MIGO with respect to this PO for 50 qty with delivery note ref DC-53.
When i try to do MIGO with the same PO and same delivery note DC-53 for the balance 50 quantiy,
System should intimate me as warning / error..
How can we acheive this by standard SAP. If not possible by standard SAP wats the alternate.
Vijay

HI Vijay,
It is possible to check warning / error message display of the MIGO bottom of the screen through ABAP delveloper with enhancement (Validation).
After enhancement, MIGO posting is not allow to duplicate DC Ref.no. and also double entry of the same DC ref.no.
Hope, it is useful for you.
Regards,
K.Rajendran.

AVC check with commitment at pr/po

Hi All,
Have a situation on funds AVC and their commitments.
Option1:
PR Level: - Funds AVC check u2013 Hard, meaning perform availability control check without commitment of funds (statistical update). System has to throw an error and route mails to respective people to do the needful.
PO level: - Funds AVC check and update of commitments.
Option2:
PR Level: - Funds AVC check and update of commitments.
PO Level: - Funds AVC check statistical without commitment, is it feasible or what would be the best alternative.
Option3:
PR Level: - Funds AVC check and update of commitments.
PO Level: - Funds AVC check and update of commitments.
In this scenario, which one should take (PR or PO) the priority if any differences happened
E.g. PO (8 qty) <PR (10 qty) if thereu2019s no subsequent PO, is system allows to append the remaining PR qty 2, since PR released approved, is this advisable, what would be the best practice.
Was look around the sap help but unable to find out the appropriate inputs on this.
Could you please share your thoughts and advices on the 3 options possibilities!
Thanks,
VK

Hi Ajay/ Eli,
Appreciate your quick response; please correct my understanding if Iu2019m mistaken:
Option 2 and 3, priority of funds AVC/commitment taken by PR rather PO.
Option 1 priority taken by PO for AVC/Commitment rather PR.
How to clear the encumbered fund on PR level, where there is no Subsequent PO (referring back to Option 1 & 2 as per my understand)
Is all the options are possible without any enhancements, if need any plz specify, the reason to ask client can choose either one based on the validation and flexibility.
Option1
At PR level, hard AVC check (throw an error when reaches the upper limit) without funds commitment, and PO level AVC check with commitment of funds, the PO level AVC is the priority (to address any differences).
Option2
Is PR level AVC is the priority (to addres differences) since committing funds, PO level just do AVC check without committing funds
Option3
Since AVC/Commitment of funds enabled PR & PO, which one should take proiority (to address differences), is this possible!
Do share some useful links/stuff to get more knowledge on this, since I'm pursuing knowledge.
Please advice.
Bunch of Thanks in Advance,
VS

LIN Diagnostic mode with VI / C (DLL)

Hello all,
I'm trying to communicate with a DUT using LIN Diagnostic mode.
I'm making use of the NI PCI-8516.
I had a look at the examples on the CD that came with the product.
There are VI and VS C examples.
With the VS examples, I saw that sending PDU packets with LIN isn't implemented.
With Flexray, it is.
I tried modifying the LIN VI examples to send PDU packets (see examples).
Everything is set on PDU and I also modified the LDF for diagnostic mode.
I tried to modify the Init LIN Frame array VI .
After running, following exeption is given:
[IMG]http://i57.tinypic.com/2due6bn.png[/IMG]
Someone experienced this error before?
Is it even possible to use LIN diagnostic mode with a VI using NI XNET?
Does anyone by chance ever created a driver (dll/ VS project) which can communicate over LIN diagnostic mode?
Thanks in advance!!
BR Jeroen
Attachments:
LIN Frame Input Output Same Port_Test_Diag_Mode.vi ‏39 KB
NI-XNET Example subVI - Initialize LIN Frame Array_Diag.vi ‏26 KB
NIXNET_exampleLDF_dia.txt ‏3 KB

btw the Automotive Diagnostic Command Set offers LIN Diagnostics at a high level
so may check if it offers what you are looking for as already build in feature:
http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/203554

Metagen is skipped sometimes complaining because all output files are up-to-date with respect to the input files

Hi,
In one of my dll (VS2010), the process Skipping target "MetaGen" because all output files are up-to-date with respect to the input files.
it is at random. I have checked the time stamps of the dll and metagen.write.1.tlog both having the time stamp on the failed build. But all files in release folder did not have the same time. They are one hour earlier than the dll
and the metagen.write.1.tlog.
On the good build it said the input file is is newer than output file ".\Release\\metagen.write.1.tlog" and allfiles in the release folder have same time stamp.
Any clue to solve this ?
Regards,

Hi,
Based on your post, I am not very clear about your issue. I feel your issue is out of support range of VS General Question forum which mainly discusses
the usage of Visual Studio IDE such as WPF & SL designer, Visual Studio Guidance Automation Toolkit, Developer Documentation and Help System
and Visual Studio Editor.
Could you please provide us more information so that we resolve your issue better?
What type of project are you working with? C++ MFC project?
How was the
metagen.write.1.tlog file generated in your project?
What error messages did you get?
What is the 'input file'?
If possible, please provide us a sample project to reproduce your issue.
Thanks,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

How to delete the row in table control with respect to one field in module pool programming?

Hi,
Can I know the way to delete the row in table control with respect to one field in module pool programming
Regards
Darshan MS

HI,
I want to delete the row after the display of table control. I have created push button as delete row. If I click on this push button, the selected row should get deleted.
I have written this code,
module USER_COMMAND_9000 input.
DATA OK_CODE TYPE SY-UCOMM.
OK_CODE = SY-UCOMM.
CASE OK_CODE.
     WHEN 'DELETE'.
        LOOP AT lt_source INTO ls_source WHERE mark = 'X'.
            APPEND LS_SOURCE TO LT_RESTORE.
            DELETE TABLE LT_SOURCE FROM LS_SOURCE.
            SOURCE-LINES = SOURCE-LINES - 1.
        ENDLOOP.
But I'm unable to delete the selected rows, It is getting deleted the last rows eventhough I select the other row.
So I thought of doing with respect to the field.

On-line funds checking with respect to project budgets

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for