OpenGL 2.0 graphics capability

i was wondering if anyone is able to help me please? I have a iphone 3 8GB which is currently on version 4.2.1. When i try and install an app it tells me i need openGL 2.0 graphics. Ive tried updating my itunes to the latest version and then updating my iphone but it still says version 4.2.1 is the latest! any ideas how to get this openGL 2.0 graphics?

4.2.1 is the latest OS compatible with your 3G. Your hardware is four generations old and cannot run more current operating systems.

Similar Messages

  • HT4623 When i try to download apps this message comes up. This app is incompatible with this Ipod Touch, this app requires OpenGL ES 2.0 graphics capability. can i up grade my ipod to OpenGL ES 2.0, or do i have to buy a new one?

    When i try to download apps this message comes up. This app is incompatible with this Ipod Touch, this app requires OpenGL ES 2.0 graphics capability. can i up grade my ipod to OpenGL ES 2.0, or do i have to buy a new one?

    Correct. That error indicates you have a 2G iPod. You say you have an 8 GB 3G iPod there is not such thing. Apple only made 32 and 64 GB 3G iPods. You have a 2G iPod.

  • IDS 11g Forms and "included" Graphics capability?

    Grant,
    what is the projected integrated graphics/charting capability in 11g version of Forms?
    Will there be an integrated graphics/charting capability like we have now in 10.2.1.0.2 Reports or are we still going to continue using FormsGraph.jar file Frank Nimphius developed (but not officially supported by Oracle)?
    If this will be an integrated feature, then what are the improvements will be compared to the existing FormsGraph.jar implementation?
    Is there any documentation on Forms 11g and integrated graphics capability?
    note: I remember way back when I was told that graphics capability will be integrated to Forms in 11g - this is why I am asking.
    Thank you very much.
    Message was edited by:
    zaferaktan
    Message was edited by:
    zaferaktan

    What is the official channel at Oracle Corp. to ask for a feature enhancements for Forms 11, such as implementing the charting capability into Forms 11 and "officially" support it, instead of asking questions on OTN and getting "non OTN available/downloadable FormsGraph.jar updates" from Frank Nimphius (the FormsGraph.jar available on OTN is not the latest version of it). I appreciate Frank for sending me a latest version of the file yesterday very much, but it is not working when deployed from iAS 10.1.2.0.2, so I ended up sending him another e-mail for help - and I am sure he is busy with other things. I hope an official implementation in Forms 11 will be maintained and supported by more than 1 person at Oracle Corp. I am planning to call OPN, is that the right channel to ask this feature enhancement request for Forms 11 ?
    Thank you

  • Draw OpenGL- or Direct3D graphics on IMAQ camera window?

    I am making a vision-application to track the position and orientation of an object. Now I want to overlay OpenGL- or Direct3D graphics (or similar) onto the object in the image.
    In other words, this will be sort of an Augmented Reality application.
    Can I do this directly onto the IMAQ window that shows the live camera image? If yes - how? If no - then how? Do I have to show the image and the graphics with OpenGL or with Direct3D? Or any other ways?
    -Thanks!

    Hm, well, I guess that does work, but then I have to figure out for myself what pixels need to be changed. I would rather like to just call some OpenGL-/GLUT functions like glutDrawSolidSphere() etc. Then I only have to worry about position, orientation and size of the cube - not as low-level as changing pixels.
    Thanks, anyway!
    Torbjørn

  • GMA X3100 Graphics capability

    thinking to get my daughter her first macbook for college. went to local apple store to check out the 13" and they said it wont run games like Quake4 or Sims2. Looked into what the games require for graphics, but I don't know one graphics card from another. Also, bottom end Macbook Pro is a little to rich ($$$) for a 1st year college kid... plus I'm afraid someone my steal the Pro! Maybe I should just get her a PC (please forgive me).
    Quake4 requires: ATI Radeon 9600 or NVidia GeForce 6600 or later 64MB VRAM.
    Sims2 requires: ATI Radeon 9000 or later or NVidia GeForce FX5200 or later 32MB VRAM (64MB recommended).
    question: how does the X3100 compare to these graphics capabilites and/or is the guy at the store right and the 13" macbook isn't game friendly??
    thanks, Chris

    He's partially correct.
    It will run those games decently when set at a low FPS (frames per second) setting. It is not the ideal choice however for gaming, video editing, etcetera because of it's non-upgradeable video card.
    It's a great college laptop, however. (works for me!)
    If intense games are real important, I would get her an iMac if portability isn't a huge thing. They are very affordable and do well with games.
    If intense games aren't real important, I would get her the MacBook.
    I would go to an Apple Store and see if they have a MacBook with some games on it. To give yourself an idea of what I mean by "decent".
    Good luck with your purchase.
    **Just say NO to PC!**

  • I was trying download a game my iPod say I need gl es 2.0 graphics capability

    I was trying download a game my iPod say I need gl es 2.0 graphics capability

    You have a 2G iPod. That App requires at least a 3G iPod..
    To more easily find compatible apps:
    iOSSearch - search the iTunes store for compatible apps.
    Apple Club - filter apps by iOS version.
    Starting when iOS 7 was released, Apple now allows downloading the last compatible version of some apps (iOS 4.2.1 and later only)
    App Store: Downloading Older Versions of Apps on iOS - Apple Club
    App Store: Install the latest compatible version of an app
    You first have to download the non-compatible version on your computer. Then when you try to purchase the version on your iPod you will be offered a compatible version if one exists.

  • Graphics capability

    I have an old windows tower with 64 mb of video memory. I saw that the video memory is shared system memory in a mini. I was just wondering if I would be able to play my old windows games, namely Diablo 2 and Max Payne 2, with the same level of performance as on my Windows machine, as well as get the same performance using my 3D graphics program, Animation Master.
    http://www.hash.com/2007web/

    I'm no expert on Windows games, but I imagine it would work the same way as any graphics-intensive app. Because the Mini uses the system memory as its video memory, it would be wise to upgrade your system memory so that performance is not affected as much. But even doing that isn't a definite solution.
    Good luck!
    Jason

  • Macbook graphics capable of xgl/aixgl on Linux?

    Aside from whether Vista will work correctly, and more importantly , will the new MacBooks support the xgl or aigxl projects on Linux? I believe that intel graphic chipsets are usually well supported within linux, but have heard that there may be a problem with the way the GMA950 on the Mac Minis and MacBooks are configured. Easy test could be with the Kororaa LiveCD maybe.
    Any advice (particularly confirmed experiences) or more insight would be wonderful.
    many thanks, forbes.
    Before you say it, I know I am crazy for wanting to run anything other than OS X, but thats not the point of this thread so please don't bother going there

    Just to let everyone know, in case you are still searching for an answer to this, I installed AIGLX and compiz last night and it flies along quiet happily
    Apparently XGL is real slow on the MacBook, but AIGLX certainly works for me. Either way you still get the great compiz effects
    I followed the instructions on this blog and added it to my dual boot black MacBook (with 2GB RAM) last night on an Ubuntu Dapper 6.06 install. Fantastic.
    Just find the section under “3D Accelerated Desktop/aiglx compiz:” over here:
    [URL="http://bin-false.org/?p=17"]http://bin-false.org/?p=17[/URL]
    Only took about 30 minutes.

  • Is there a way of improving my graphics on my early 2011 macbook pro 13"?

    Does anyone know a way of improving the graphics capability for OpenGL with the Intel 3000 chips in the early 2011 MBP 13"? I bought it not realising the graphics chips had been downgraded and now as a result struggle to do any CGI work that I rely on my computer to do.

    CHRIBAM wrote:
    I'm more inclined to go with Ogelthorpe's advice (if I had the cash).
    I agree with Ogelthorpe as well, the 15" and the 17" MacBook Pro also have dedicated graphics cards which give more performance than the Intel HD 3000 only graphics, which is really of MacBook type performance for consumer user. (playback of video and that's about it)
    Still wondering why Apple went backwards for graphics in the 13", I completely missed the change.
    I'm peeved at Apple for the fact that they didn't make a clear distinction of the disadvantages of the 13" with no dedicated graphics card then lumped it in with the 15" and 17" which do.
    To Apple it's a matter of performance for price, the 13" scores 11 on Cinebench, the 15/17" score 30 and 45, so the  13" doesn't even come close. But it comes in the same silver case, the same "MacBook Pro" name, when in fact it's not so.
    Apple knows people would be attracted to the performance of the MacBook Pro name in a small size factor, the price is also attractive to the younger crowd, the younger crowd are also interested in running 3D games, which need a more powerful video card.
    Your not the first who's complained and feels burned, you trusted Apple was selling you a powerful MacBook Pro machine and you've got a consumer machine instead.
    The 13" Mac laptop should have gotten it's own category, called it a MacBook instead and it should have come with white or black case. But that would have angered Intel most likely, who are trying to push integrated graphics on their CPU's so they own the whole show eventually.
    It's going to take a long time before CPU integrated graphics is ever going to beat dedicated GPU graphics, because 3D game detail is always going to go up until it finally reaches 3D raytracing at 200 fps.
    What Apple is doing is trying to get folks hooked on lessor quality/detail games, the ones you see on iPads and iPhones, and away from wanting rich detail which needs a powerful dedicated video card.
    So Apple lumps the 13" MacBook in with the MacBook Pro line, try to force the issue, next they will try it with the 15", integrated graphics on the low end model. Then again only dedicated graphics on the 17" model and so forth. Eventually developers won't make as many 3D games for Mac's because most people buy laptops, cuts into their potential sales.
    If you really want to run 3D games, you have to go with a Windows 7 desktop where the video card can be swtiched out.
    http://www.cbscores.com/index.php?sort=ogl&order=desc

  • Please help me find the most graphically competant PC in existance

    Hi there.
    This isn't strictly Arch-related, but probably the best place for a post like this nonetheless
    The mandatory story (scroll down if you're short on time or are like "TL;DR")
    Over the past few weeks, I've posted on forums, listened to people on IRC, thought, thought some more, and tried to get an idea of the kind of the computer I need. And, after way too much stringing myself out over the whole issue, I've finally decided to give up.
    You guys know Linux, in the sense that some of you use Linux for the reasons I want/need to run Linux for, and run the applications I want/need to run. So you're walking reviews of how responsive your hardware is under the stress you put it under (if you do at all), and in a prime position to explain to me what I need.
    Up until now, I've used old hardware that's anywhere between "OUCH." and "*faints*" behind today's tech - I was using DOS in 1997, Win 3.1 in 2000, and Win98 in 2005-2006. Then things took a turn for the better (I believe in God so I know he had something in that change of events) and I got an old P4 with 512MB RAM. And that's when I was able to finally install XP - and when XP went to the "wow" I could never make my own to the "bleough, get this thing off me" it is, aka I "saw the light". And installed Linux. Arch Linux.
    But I've finally outgrown this PC by several Saturn-sized margins, and need a new one. I've processed a lot of information, did quite a cram (that didn't even break a sweat although I thought it would, like this comic strip ) and learned about FSBs, RAM speed/timings and the like in less than a week, finally put my finger on the reason why my PC is so slow, learned about RAM size and so on... and started churning out keywords like a quad-core processor, 8GB RAM, etc... then it went to 16 cores, 32GB RAM, then 64GB RAM... and then things got really bad.
    Everything reached a "capacity head" when I noticed that Intel are going to be releasing a 6-core chip as the last of their Penryn line, and mentioned this to a friend (who has a way bigger handle on hardware than I do, and taught me most of what I know), and shortly after other (related) topics were discussed he showed me this motherboard (he actually showed me this URL, the first URL the product page) that would work with it. That board has space for 192GB of RAM... enough said? Enough said. Ooh, right - it also has space for 4 of those 6-core Intel thingies. I don't think anyone can beat 24 cores. Well, AMD will be able to, with their 12-core chips they're releasing sometime... but then Intel will pwn them with their own 6-core Nehalems (which have HT, so 12-core) and we'll have 48 cores... and it will all continue.
    Now, that server board is only $1195. I'd think that a few people could manage to do a bit of saving and scrimping to get a board like that, and I was figuring out how to do exactly that... until my friend told me the small issue that that board has 24 RAM slots, and a single 8GB stick of FBDIMM RAM is going to set me back a relatively manageable $1,100! $25k for RAM anybody?!
    That board was off the list quickly. Very quickly
    And my ideas... they just all ended. I like the idea of 24 cores a lot, because I'd be able to run 24 different Linux distros at once, or perhaps encode a DVD while playing a really intensive game through WINE through while being logged in to 10 Folding@Home accounts while load-testing 8 different Linux distros in VMs to see their performance differences while watching a Blu-Ray disc on another screen while keeping an eye on a full-motion animation I was developing using Blender while I was running Chrome over WINE in another window for the lulz. But... who's going to do that, except for a "look at me" video or two (that would quickly become one of the most viewed videos whereever it went )?
    I mentioned the current hardware I have above to give you an idea of what I can, and can't, do right now - what I can't do includes animation. My PC maxes out watching youtube - or any video for that fact. It just makes the CPU hit 100%. And if you think that's because of Flash being absolute garbage on Linux, when I play stuff in mplayer, it typically hits 70% at the default window size. Yes, this is the bane of having a garbage GPU, one of the other things I need to upgrade. But case in point, not only can I not do animation, I can't do a lot of other things, and since pretty much most of my friends are online and not physical (how I like it), I'm not really able to try out other PCs from a "local" standpoint and see how they fare under differing circumstances. Plus, most of my friends' PCs are as bad as mine . If I look at that system from a possibility perspective, I see a system that can do whatever I want it to. Not mainly from a RAM perspective, but from a processing perspective - animation. And I want to get into animation, but I don't know where to start spec-wise. And I think that a server board with 192GB of RAM will be able to render animation really well. Scheduled animation, that is, not realtime animation, and area I want to get into also. Plus, that board doesn't have a lot of PCI slots...
    But in case you haven't noticed, I don't know what I need in order to do what I want so I'm massively overcompensating to the extent that I'm breaking the bank.
    The point
    What I want is to be able to...
    ...throw any type of visual medium at my PC and expect it to respond in a nanosecond. Be that a high-definition movie from a BD-DVD or my hard disk, a complex realtime animation I just coded (or however you create that sort of thing), or both at the same time, I want it to play with graphics capability to spare for a (considerably) graphically complex game, even one running through WINE.
    ...run 3 30" displays off my system and expect them all to run at 50 or 70fps with all 12288000 pixels of the 3 screens updating at the same time.
    ...run a decent number of VMs at once, say 8 or 12.
    ...edit impossibly large images and still have a responsive system.
    ...keep an insane (1000+) number of tabs open in Firefox, indefinitely.
    I think (read: hope) you're getting an idea of the kind of system I want here. Something that heads heavily into the field of realtime graphics management, but also something that functions just as well as an ordinary PC.
    Some other points to note:
    * I want to be able to leave my PC on at night without it chewing its way through the local power station's reserves.
    * I want a decent amount of diskspace, say 5 or 10 TB. I currently have around 400GB of old files and triplicates of my duplicates, and I've not been able to sort it out. Ever. In 7 years. Meep? Meep. And for the ickies among you lot, FYI, none of that will be for pr0n. Just in case you missed the vague I-am-a-Christian hint in the paragraphs above (or went TL;DR at it).
    * I don't need a quiet system. Yes, I'm not joking, I don't care. Provided it's not a jet engine.
    * Watercooling is out, Zalman CPU coolers are in.
    * Overclocking is out - well, major overclocking anyway. I've never overclocked before, and I'll likely wander into my BIOS one day and be like *read manual* *doublecheck manual* "okay, if I raise that by 1 MHz..."
    * Nehalem - no thanks. It's version 1.0 (well it will be when it comes out), and Linux hasn't had a chance to take advantage of all the new stuff that is likely to surface about the new chip. No, that isn't a hint, it's a random realization I just had, and I don't work for and am not related to Intel or anyone who works there.
    What I've been thinking is a good target:
    * An 8-core system by way of a dual-socket board and two 4-core chips
    * Two ATI Radeon 4870X2s for graphics
    * 3 HP LP3095 10-bit 30" LCDs
    * A G15 keyboard
    * Both MX Air and MX Revolution mice (for different situations)
    * A Lian-Li PC-V2110B case (yes, $500, but it looks awesome while not looking violent)
    * Somewhere between 8 and 64GB of RAM, depending on how much you think I need.
    Price isn't really an issue here; I'm interested in knowing what I need for a working system - this is my first big upgrade and big upgrades don't cost $1. Or ¥1. Or €1.
    So... that's all I know for sure. Everything else is "?!?!?!?!... *dies*". And I've given up trying to respawn and think about it anymore.
    -dav7
    Last edited by dav7 (2008-09-15 01:18:28)

    That's going to be a ridiculous waste of money and energy.
    First of all, the current ATI drivers don't support multiple GPUs, so at the moment even a single 4870X2 would be only a 'normal' 4870 (which is quite a speed beast already). GFX drivers evolve rapidly, so things might look different next month, but when it comes to Linux and hardware there's one Golden Rule: stay away from the newest stuff and wait for proper support to get coded.
    I also wonder what power supply could possibly cope with the differences between idle and full load; that's way beyond 400W. But then, I'm one of those "quiet&green" types where >100W idle is already a bit much.
    I kind of understand that you want to get it done and not worry about hardware for the next 10 years or so, but that's simply not how the hardware world works and never did. At least not for the average consumer.

  • Graphic Card upgrade HP Pavilion Slimlines3420f

    Hey I have a hp pavilion slimline s3420f, and I've graphic problems with games like Resident evil 5, so I want to upgrade the graphic card, but I just dont know which one to buy. I know that I need a low profile one, but I ignore any other specifications.
    thanks

    Hi,
    The main problem you are going to face is your PC only has a 160W Power Supply Unit.  Without upgrading your PSU, you will struggle to find any card that will improve your graphics capability.
    Best wishes,
    DP-K
    ****Click the White thumb to say thanks****
    ****Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem****
    ****I don't work for HP****
    Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience

  • How to enable only intel graphics/d​iscrete graphics on T400(WxgA+​), windows xp,

    I got a T400  with switchabale graphics (something i dont understand). I want my 9 cells to  provide as long a run as feasible
    without recharging. Which mode of graphics should i set it to and how do i do it?.
    My blackbox (a bit heavy for me for carrying ) is a t400 with 9 cells and a wxga+, 2gb,120GB.

    Edited: Sorry, missed the first time that you were on XP. The answer below is for Vista only. For XP because of op sys limitations you don't have true switchable graphics capability. You can switch between the two graphics cards during BIOS setup only. To switch, reboot turning power off, then power on and on initial screen hold F1 to enter BIOS setup. Choose config and then display, and toggle graphics between integer (energy saving) and discrete (high performance). First time you switch you may have to reboot an extra time to allow the drivers to install.
    If you have the latest release of the power manager (2.42) right click on it (the battery icon) and choose switchable graphics. If you are still on 2.37 or earlier release of the power manager left click instead. Once you have found the switchable graphics option switch between the two graphics cards by choosing energy saving and high performance GRAPHICS. (NOT similar options in the normal part of the power manager.)
    Here is the Lenovo switchable graphics FAQ
    Message Edited by zilla on 01-25-2009 01:06 PM
    T500: Vista 32, 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 15.4" 1680x1050, 500GB 7200rpm, ATI Radeon HD3650 + Intel 4500MHD. T42: XP, 1.7GHz, 2GB RAM, 14.1" 1024x768, 250GB PATA, ATI Radeon 7500.

  • OpenGL 4.1 support in 10.6.7 or Lion?

    Hi, I was wondering if the new Mac OS 10.6.7 update or the upcoming Mac OS Lion update has the OpenGL 4.1 graphics drivers. Anybody know?

    I read in the forums on the game website (which I'm having trouble with, because apparently my OpenGL driver didn't install correctly) that it updated to 3.2 or something of that effect.

  • Mac Pro Graphics card expansion

    Hi, I'm a little confused as to how I can expand the graphics capability of my Mac Pro. It has a Radeon 2600XT 256 meg graphics card. I know I can add another one of those, but many of the Radeon 2600 XT cards I see are 512 meg. Will those work too? If I do add another 2600XT 256, would there be a noticeable improvement in performance in games like Second Life?
    Thanks

    You can only use an Apple Radeon, and having two won't improve things. If you run Windows you can use Apple's or 3rd party PC card.
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper11.html
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper8.html
    http://www.barefeats.com/york2.html

  • Is it possible to update or install a new graphics processor?

    I am currently playing second life and it runs very slow and sometimes choppy. I checked on the website for system requirements and realized I don't have the appropriate processor needed to run this application. I would like very much to update and install new processors but wasn't sure If I was able to. If anyone has any helpful information, please help! Thank you...
    SecondLifer...

    Hi, SecondLifer, and welcome to Apple Discussions. No, whatever graphics capability your Powerbook was shipped with, you'll have to live with it. It's all soldered onto the logic board — there's no card to replace, as there would be in a desktop computer. Nor am I aware of any currently available CardBus graphics accelerator similar to the old IX3D Road Rockethttp://www.welovemacs.com/ix3d.html of 1998. I don't recall whether the Road Rocket was actually faster than the Wallstreet G3's built-in graphics processor, or was just designed to allow the addition of another monitor.

Maybe you are looking for