Option 'Maintenance Order' missing in 'Allowed Object Types' tab in IMG of User status Profiles

Dear All
I have created a User Profile using T-Code OIBS.
Now I want to assign that User Profile to Maintenance Order. But in the 'Allowed Object Types' tab, the option "Maintenance Order" is missing due to which I am unable to assign it to Maintenance Order.
Could anyone tell how to add the option "Maintenance Order" in 'Object Types'.
Thanks in advance.
BK

Hi Peter
Thanks for your help.
I just found that in t-code BS13, the object categories ORI and ORH exist but 'No Status Profile' check is marked against them. That is the reason why the system is not showing the 'Maintenance Order' as an option in Allowed Object Types.
Thanks a lot !
Best Regards,
BK

Similar Messages

  • Object Types in User Status profile for Investment managment

    Is there any one who has idea about what object types should I select in User Status Profile for Investment management . this is very urgent .
    Regards
    Rama Shanker Sharma

    Dear Ram,
    User Status can be maintained in the system as foll
    Maintain the Status Profile first in OK02
    Status no       Status        Short text         Initial status flag    lowest    Highest
    10                  NBU            Not Budgeted             ^                10          20
    20                  BUD           Budgeted                                      10          20      
    in
    Status
    NBU
    maintain the required fields as required by your process requirement
    Material purchase order
    Material purchase requisition
    Partially release project
    Release etc
    and define each line item weather it should be No influence/Allowed/Warning/Forbidden/No Action/Set/Delete
    Repeat the same logic for
    Status
    BUD
    I hope this solves your problem, if not please write in detail your requirement.
    Regards,
    Vikat Verlekar

  • User Status Profile for Process Order Operations

    Hello Experts.
    I have a need to set up a User Status at the Process Order Operation level that will prevent operation confirmation when the status is Active .
    I have been successful at the following:
       --- Created a new Status Profile (transaction BS02),
       --- Creating a u201CHoldu201D status,
       --- Defined the Influence on Business Transactions,
       --- Set the allowed Object Types for the profile.
       --- In an individual Process Order operation, I can now select the Status Profile, and set the Hold status, and it functions correctly.
    My problem is that I canu2019t figure out how to set my new profile as a default for Process Order Operations.  For Production Orders, this is done in the IMG definition for the Order Type (transaction OPJH), updating field T003O-VRG_STSMA.  However the Order Type definition for Process orders (transaction CORN) only has a field for a status profile at the header level.  Iu2019ve searched through Configuration and the Recipe, and the Production Version, and the Control Key, but can find no where to set the default status profile for a Process Order Operation..
    As a final desperate act, I manually edited a T003O record for a Process Order Type in our test system, but even this failed to set a default Operation Status Profile for subsequently created Process Orders.
    If you have any knowledge about this, then please help.

    As of this date, we have still not implemented a fix, but I did get some information from someone else who has.
    I'll post his information here for all to see.  Hope you find it helpful.
    From: Joe
    Yes we managed to do it.
    After several false starts and CMOD/projects which suffered because only the default keys (for order number, aufpl etc) were in place and not the actual, we coded up the IN_UPDATE method in the WORKORDER_UPDATE badi. This gives us the final format after the DB save (but before the commit). The update of the STATUS using the SAP std function module was actioned successfully but the status profile was not actually passed through. We assumed that this was because of the update task - so we introduced an INSERT into JSTO instead (a bit naughty I know, but desperate needs etc). If you require anything more let me know.
    Best Regards
    Joe

  • In Service Orders - Adding addition status in User Status Profile

    Hi Guyds,
    I have a question.
    Customer have a requirement where, in repair process when they receive the defective device (equipment) thru return delivery they want to put the device in contamination. And once the contamination is done they want to stage the device for repair. They are asking how can this requirement be met or mapped in SAP system? I suggested we can define additional user statuses in user status profile. Like when the device is received the user can manually set the user status as "Put to decontamination" status in service order. And once the decontamination is complete, then user can manually set another user status as "Decontamination complete" (just as an example). Customer has agreed with this suggestion.
    Now, my question is I can meet this requirement by adding addtional statuses to the user profile and then assigning the user profile to service order right? And as customer has agreed that user will have to manually set these statuses in service order, so customizing/configuring the status profile should suffice right? Or do I have to perform any enhancement? Please advice but remember that the customer has agreed to setting the user status manually, automation is not required. So, in this case do I still have to go for any enhancement to meet this requirement or can I do it just by defining extra statuses in user status profile.
    Please guide me. Appreciate your help.
    If you have any questions or need any clarifications, please let me know.
    Best regards,
    Abdul Rafey

    Hi
    As you correctly pointed out user status will be straight answer. there is no enhancement required. you have to create the user status and assign the same for the order type .
    also you can automate to some extent ex while order created you can make the "Put to decontamination" as initial and while releasing the order you can automate that "device for repair" will be set on releasing
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • User status profile assigned to document type in specific sales org.

    Hi,
    can anyone tell me, if it is possible to assign a user status profile to the combination sales document type and sales organization?
    Maybe with some kind of enhancement and/or user-exit?
    Best Regards,
    Florian

    Hi,
    You may use the following user exit to determine the relevant status profile with specific sales organization (VKORG) (There is no standard way is available to do so)
    User-Exits in Program RV45PFZA
    USEREXIT_SET_STATUS_VBUK
    In this user exit you can you can store a specification for the reserve fields in VBUK (header status). Reserve field UVK01 could, for example, be used for an additional order status (as for rejections status, etc.).
    The following workareas are available for this user exit:
    VBUK (header status)
    FXVBUP (item status)
    FXVBUV (Incompletion)
    USEREXIT_SET_STATUS_VBUP
    In this user exit you can you can store a specification for the reserve fields for VBUP (item status).
    The following workareas are available for this user exit:
    FXVBAP (Item data)
    FXVBAPF (Dynamic part of order item flow)
    FXVBUV (Incompletion)
    USEREXIT_STATUS_VBUK_INVOICE
    You can use this user exit to influence billing status at header level.
    regards
    Vivek.
    Edited by: Vievk Vardhan on Jan 12, 2010 2:46 PM

  • User status profiles for work orders and sub-orders

    Hi Experts,
    I have the following question regarding status profiles for SAP PM work orders (but I guess it relates to all user status profiles).
    Customizing
    A status profile is defined for order type "PM_A", which contains an authorization key "OP" for certain user states (to be set by the ordering party)
    Situation
    The ordering party A creates an order of type PM_A for contractor B, and B then creates a sub-order of type PM_A for contractor C
    Problem
    - If I assign the authorization key "OP" only to roles of party A, then party B can't set the user states reserved for the ordering party (correct for the order A->B, but not for the sub-order B->C)
    - If I assign the authorization key "OP" to roles of party A and party B, then B could set certain user states reserved for the ordering party in the order A->B, which is also wrong
    Question
    Is there a way to restrict sub-orders differently than "non-sub-orders", or do I have to create a "sub-order order-type" for each order type, in order to assign them different status profiles and authorization keys?
    Thanks a lot!

    hi
    since you have 3 roles to be assigned to the same order type with different authorization ,it is better you create an seperate order type for sub order and assign the user status with authorization for B and C
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • User Status Profile at Component Level in PM order

    Hi All,
    How can we assign a User Status Profile at the component level in a PM order.
    System statuses are available at component level. And these system statuses control other business transaction also. I want similar to system status, I should have some User status, which can control some business transaction.
    Please share some inputs.
    Thanks,
    Piyush

    Hi Thyagarajan,
    Thanks for the reply.
    My actual requirement is as follows:
    The component's tab page will have many component line items.
    I want a seperate PR for each one.
    But I want that based on an influencing factor, I should be able to control, the timing when PR is generated for each component line item.
    i.e. PR should not be generated together for all line items, but at different times for diff line items.
    Please give some input.
    Thanks and regards,
    Piyush

  • User Status Profile not getting copied to Objects (ECM)

    Dear Experts,
    I Have created Change Type assign with Status Profile, This Profile is correctly appearing in Change NO (ECR),
    In Header but After Selecting some of the Objects like, BOM or Material the Status Profile is not getting copied.
    I have two level of Approvals required.
    do am i missing something here...
    Please suggest
    Thanks
    Regards
    Raghu
    Edited by: raghu m on Nov 12, 2009 10:34 AM

    Closed!

  • To change user status profile on sales order at run time.

    Hi Experts,
    We have defined status profile for Sales returns ( Doc type RE) which blocks the  return order on creation. There are two statuses here which are to remove the delivery block and to remove the billing block by authorised users.
    The requirement is now to have a three level block ( three statuses ) on the same document. We can create a new status profile and assign it to a new return sales order tpye  but we want to avoid creating new document types. Since this document type is used across various companies in the group we can not assign a new profile on the existing RE document as well.
    My question to all experts is
    Is it possible to dynamically change the status profile assigned to the document type based on characterstics like sales org or company code etc? If any body has done this please let me know the user exit , function module, BADI etc where the necessary coding has been done.
    Helpful answers will be rewarded with points.
    I look forward to your co operation.
    Regards,
    Kartik Shah

    Hi Liam,
    In the Program MV45AFZZ in the FORM userexit_save_document
    you use the following fn module to change the user status
    'STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN'
    Example
    IF t180-trtyp = 'H'.  "Only creation time
      READ TABLE xvbap WITH KEY matnr = c_matnr.
      IF sy-subrc = 0.  "If above material exist then change status
        LOOP AT xvbap WHERE cuobj NE space
                       AND  matnr =  c_matnr.
          l_objnr = xvbap-objnr.
          CALL FUNCTION 'STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN'
            EXPORTING
              objnr               = l_objnr
              user_status         = 'E0013'  "Send ej IDOC
              set_chgkz           = 'X'
            EXCEPTIONS
              object_not_found    = 1
              status_inconsistent = 2
              status_not_allowed  = 3
              OTHERS              = 4.
        ENDLOOP.
      ENDIF.
      sy-subrc = 0.  "Restore the previous condition
    ENDIF.
    Reward if helpful *********

  • User Status Profile for Purchase order

    hi
    Can any one help me how to created user statuses other than system status for Purchase order? where to assign it to PO document type.
    Rajendra

    Dear Rajendra,
    I'm not sure there a standard field for user status in PO, you have to custom it, but it's not recommended.Perhaps u should check what if the critical use for this user status before u    continue to custom.
    regards

  • Why is there no option to change UI to allow classic type button control? New control is too spread out and fundamentially useless.

    Why was this ever changed? Why was it changed without asking/polling? Why is it so spread out? Why would it be purposely made, to make it difficult to browse the web? Why would you sabotage your own product?! I am NOT the only person out here asking these same questions! I am NOT a conformist, I do NOT like having something taken from a product I use, I do NOT like not having the option to have it as it was, I do NOT like to search for the basic buttons of navigating, I do NOT like having to move my mouse from one end of the screen to the other, just to stop a page quickly [which cannot happen as it is too darn far away now!!!!] This has been driving me absolutely bat-shit for quiet a while now! There was "add-ons" to restore BASIC FUNCTION to a "ADVANCED" browser!!!! Sometimes upgrades are really downgrades.
    QUESTION OF THE DECADE: "Where did my buttons go, and WHY DID YOU TAKE THEM?!"
    For aesthetics? Screw that, give me FUNCTIONALITY!

    You can provide Feedback to Mozilla here:
    https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/feedback
    ''this topic has been covered repeatedly over the last 7 months - locking this thread as it doesn't contain any support questions''

  • Prevention of delivery when using "user status profile" for a sales order?

    Hi,
    I have used "user profile status" in the sales order "as a work flow" for releasing the sales order.
    The user profile are as follows
    a) 10: created
    b) 20: Released
    But I believe I am still able to create the delivery when the order status is still "10" created.
    Any advise, user exit or workaround or should this happen.
    Usefull answers will be rewarded.
    Thanks

    Dear Rajiv,
    Please go through this SAP help link it will help you about Status Management in the sales order processing.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/dd/560629545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
    I hope htis will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Inactive user status profile for order

    Hi All
    In CRM quotation, the initial user status 'Quotaion created ' is active.Now using a BADI on customer expected price mismatch I am adding 'price mismatch' user status.Requiremnt is I need to have one user status active at any instance. I am trying to inactive the 'Quotaion created' status but not able to. I tried using CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN,but not successful. Can anybody please help..
    Regards,
    Sai Prasad

    When you activate another user status the revious should be set to inactive by standard. You can have only one active user status, while on other hand you can have several active system statuses.
    If you use function CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN to set new user status, the current user status wil be automaticaly set to inactive. If you test it from se37, don't forget to use also BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT.
    Regards.

  • User statuses for equipment,functional location,order,notification

    Kindly suggest me which user statuses should be assigned to equipment,func. location,notification & order.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Vivek,
    There is no rule or std instruction which user status to be assinged to equipment,FL, Notification or order. In std you may get some user status for equipment. notification etc. It doesnt mean that you should use it. User status are define /created base on the  business requirement . a user status can be assigned to multiple object type such as equipment, notification ,order etc.
    You can refer the std user status profile when you create your own. In order to know the detail of it object type. You can select the status profile >> click on the detail>> click on the object types.
    Hope it is helpful to you.
    if you want further detail please revert.
    DP

  • Origin Object Type for Plant Maintenance Orders in Profit Center Accounting

    Hi,
    I want to make a selection for plant maintenance orders in transaction KE5Z, report for line items in Profit Center Accounting. When checking possible input options for the selection field <b></b>Origing Object Type<b></b> the system shows value 15 for Maintenance Orders. However I discovered in our system the maintenance orders are reported as Origing Object Type 03, which is Overhead Orders according to the selection list. So I cannot distinguish between overhead orders and maintenance orders in this report.
    What is the cause our maintenance orders are assigned to Origin Object Type 03 in stead of 15 and what is the customizing transaction to correct this ?

    Looks like, this is no longer supported. Refer to note 168004 and  102434.
    Cause and prerequisites
    These functions were not programmed to meet the above requirements.
    As of Release 4.0, the object type is transferred directly.
    Solution
    Once you have implemented the advance correction. the origin object type 'Overhead cost order' (03) is assigned irrespective of what is the SCOPE for orders.
    As a result of implementing this note or as of Release 4.6B, the order category distinguishes between overhead cost orders and production orders in the origin object type. In this case, the following origin object types result (as described above in 1.):
    Order category 04 to 10, 40 => 04 (production order)
    All other order categories => 03 (overhead cost order)
    The logic that the origin object type was set depending on the object class (as described above in 2.) is no longer supported. The object class can be evaluated separately in Reporting. -
    The corrections of this note refer in Release 4.0B to the corrections from Note 102434.

Maybe you are looking for