Oracle 10G Upgrade planning

We have various applications (OLTP and DW) on Oracle 9i release 2 databases (RAC and non-RAC). Is there a document for planning the upgrade from Oracle 9i release 2 database to Oracle 10G?
Any document on how to plan the upgrade based on the applications that we have on the databases, impacts and other gotchas? Can someone point me to such documents if they exist.
Thanks.

I had a problem when I was executing Catpatch.SQL (A Postinstallation task), I had to drop the schema XDB, as a workaround to this problem. I used the steps listed by Metalink to migrate from 9.2.0.5 to 10.1.0.2.
The metalink doc id is: 263809.1
Subject: Complete checklist for manual upgrades to 10g.
Regards,
Raj

Similar Messages

Oracle 10G upgrade and MRP planning problems

We just upgraded to Oracle 10G and are having users complaining about MRP not planning in correct low level code sequence. What has happened is that the MRP is planning component parts before the parent parts. We have never had this occur before and are on 4.6C hot pack 38. Help!!

Hi,
There are some Post-Upgrade Tasks like set compatible, db stats, check invalid objects, removing some database parameters, etc. Make sure you perform these if you have not, please refer to your specific Oracle upgrade guide.
Thanks,
George

Oracle 8.0.6 to Oracle 10G Upgrade Query

Hi,
I have a customer that has Business Objects Release 5.1.x accessing an Oracle 8.0.6 database. They are planning to migrate the database to Oracle 10G Release 2.0
Will Business Objects Release 5.1.x reports run off their upgraded Oracle 10G Release 2.0 database or will Business Objects have to be migrated as well ?
Any pointers or links on this will be very helpful.
Thx in advance
Best Regards
Ramdas

Hi
BO5.1 is not supported with Oracle10g so the user has to upgrade their BO version too.
You can download the Product documentations from help.sap.com for detailed information.
Regards
Sourashree

Pros and Cons af Oracle 10g upgrade to 11g

Hi Basis Expert,
We have an requirement of SAP upgrade which includes BW 3.5, CRM and R/3 (4.7).
These components needs to be upgraded to the latest version
BW 3.5 to BI 7.0
R/3 (4.7) to ECC 6.0
and also CRM upgrade to the new version
The OS used is AIX and DB used is oracle 10g.
Can anybody share the pros and cons of oracle DB upgrade from 10g to 11g after SAP upgrade.
Regards,
Anil.

Hi DatabaseSAP and others,
Thanks for your reply
I started with the Oracle 11g software installer. But it gave an error during 71%. Error is
Error in invoking target 'rat_on part_on dm_on olap_on sdo_on' of makefile '/oracle/DBW/112_64/rdbms/lib/ins_rdbms.mk'.
See '/oracle/DBW/oraInventory/logs/installActions2011-10-10_12-04-03PM.log' for details.
Abort Retry Continue
But when i was going thorough the installActions2011-10-10_12-04-03PM.log . I could find that there are 7 arguments which is failed.
Below are the argument details
1)INFO: Hard Limit: maximum user processes: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the hard limit for "maximum user processes" is set to at least 16384.
INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
INFO: -
Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
INFO: Expected Value:1024
INFO: Actual Value:9223372036854775807
INFO: -
INFO: *********************************************
INFO: Hard Limit: maximum user processes: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the hard limit for "maximum user processes" is set to at least 16384.
INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
INFO: -
INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
INFO: Expected Value:16384
INFO: Actual Value:3048
INFO: Error Message:PRVF-4354 : Proper hard limit for resource "maximum user processes" not found on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "16384" ; Found = "3048"]
INFO: Cause: Hard limit for the resource does not meet the requirement on the specified node.
INFO: Action: Modify the resource limits to meet the requirement.
2)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: ncargs: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "ncargs" is properly set.
INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
INFO: -
INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
INFO: Expected Value:128
INFO: Actual Value:6
INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "ncargs" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "128" ; Found = "6"].
INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
3)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: tcp_ephemeral_low: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_low" is properly set.
INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
INFO: -
INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
INFO: Expected Value:9000
INFO: Actual Value:32768
INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_low" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "9000" ; Found = "32768"].
INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
4)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: tcp_ephemeral_high: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_high" is properly set.
INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
INFO: -
INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
INFO: Expected Value:65500
INFO: Actual Value:65535
INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_high" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "65500" ; Found = "65535"].
INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
5)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: udp_ephemeral_low: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_low" is properly set.
INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
INFO: -
INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
INFO: Expected Value:9000
INFO: Actual Value:32768
INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_low" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "9000" ; Found = "32768"].
INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
INFO: -
6)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: udp_ephemeral_high: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_high" is properly set.
INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
INFO: -
INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
INFO: Expected Value:65500
INFO: Actual Value:65535
INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_high" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "65500" ; Found = "65535"].
INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
7)INFO: Users With Same UID: This test checks that multiple users do not exist with user id as "0".
INFO: Severity:CRITICAL
INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
INFO: -
INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
WARNING: Result values are not available for this verification task
INFO: Error Message:<CV_VAL>root,|super,|zero,|</CV_VAL><CV_ERES>0</CV_ERES>
INFO: Cause:Cause Of Problem Not Available
INFO: Action:User Action Not Available
INFO: *********************************************
Please let me know what is the 7th (last one) argument.
Regards,
Anil Shenoy

Oracle 10g upgradation.

Dear Friends,
We are using ECC6.0 and Oracle 10g (10.2.0.2) and OS is HP-UX 11 v2.
Now I want to ugrade Oracle 10g to Oracle 11g.
If any one has done, please share with me and any document for guidelines.
Regards
Ganesh Datt Tiwari

> Please provide the link from where I can download the same. I have got patch set of 10.2.0.4 but not upgrade DVDs.
Those are the files you need.
- you install 10.2.0.x
- you upgrade using the patchset to 10.2.0.4
You can (and should) upgrade to 10.2.0.5. Be aware that the general support for 10.x is ending at the end of july 2011.
Markus

Oracle 10g upgrade paper

Hi,
Iam 9i OCP certified i want to give a upgrade paper to 10g (DBA ) . can u please help me with the documentation as what study material i need to crack the 10 g papaer

Hi,
Iam 9i OCP certified i want to give a upgrade paper to 10g (DBA ) . can u please help me with the documentation as what study material i need to crack the 10 g papaerThe exam topics are covered in this link:
1Z0-040, Oracle Database 10g: New Features for Administrators™
http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=41&p_exam_id=1Z0_040
Certification Upgrades
http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=44
No study material or questions can be provided as this considered as cheating!
Thanks,
Hussein

Oracle 10g upgrade

Hi
I installed Oracle enterprise edition 10.2.0.1 in Red Hat Linux x86-64and intend to apply patch 10.2.0.4
in some topic in this forum mentioned about the Ultra Search , if this component is not
installed the DBCA will gives you a error.
Before i appply the patch i try to install this component ,once i go to the DBCA and
select the -- Configure Database Options and
select the -- Database
and i try to select the Component Ultra Serarch , but it is in Grey and cannot select the component
How i can fix this issue
rds

You have just looked at the commands given there but ignored the link in the first line.
Chapter 4, "Installing Oracle Ultra Search"
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/ultra.102/b14222/install.htm#BABGCICC

Procedure execution time difference in Oacle 9i and Oracle 10g

Hi,
My procedure is taking time on
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 is 14 min.
same procedure is taking time on oracle Release 9.2.0.1.0 is 1 min.
1) Data is same in both environment.
2) Number of records are same 485 rows for cursor select statement.
3)Please guide me how to reduce the time in oracle 10g for procedure?
i have checked the explain plan for that cursor query it is different in both enviroment.
so i have analysis that procedure is taking time on cursor fetch into statement in oracle 10g.
example:-
create or replace procedure myproc
CURSOR cur_list
IS select num
from tbl
where exist(select.......
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION SET SQL_TRACE = TRUE';
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION SET TIMED_STATISTICS = TRUE';
OPEN cur_list;
LOOP
FETCH cur_list INTO cur_list; -----My procedure is taking time in this statement only for some list number. there are 485 list number.
end loop;
TRACE file for oracle 10g is look like this:-
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.37 0.46 0 2 0 0
Fetch 486 747.07 730.14 1340 56500700 0 485
total 488 747.45 730.60 1340 56500702 0 485
ORACLE 9i EXPLAIN PLAN FOR cursor query:-
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT CHOOSECost: 2 Bytes: 144 Cardinality: 12
     18 INDEX RANGE SCAN UNIQUE LISL.LISL_LIST_PK Cost: 2 Bytes: 144 Cardinality: 12
          17 UNION-ALL
               2 FILTER
                    1 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLD.P Cost: 12 Bytes: 36 Cardinality: 1
               16 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 171 Bytes: 141 Cardinality: 1
                    11 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 169 Bytes: 94 Cardinality: 1
                         8 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 168 Bytes: 78 Cardinality: 1
                              6 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 168 Bytes: 62 Cardinality: 1
                                   4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SLD.L Cost: 168 Bytes: 49 Cardinality: 1
                                        3 INDEX RANGE SCAN UNIQUE SLD.PK_L Cost: 162 Cardinality: 9
                                   5 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN UNIQUE SLD.SYS_C0025717 Bytes: 45,760 Cardinality: 3,520
                              7 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN UNIQUE SLD.PRP Bytes: 63,904 Cardinality: 3,994
                         10 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SLD.P Cost: 1 Bytes: 10,480 Cardinality: 655
                              9 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN UNIQUE SLD.PK_P Cardinality: 9
                    15 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SLD.GRP_E Cost: 2 Bytes: 9,447 Cardinality: 201
                         14 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN UNIQUE SLD.PRP_E Cost: 1 Cardinality: 29
                              13 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SLD.E Cost: 2 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 1
                                   12 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN UNIQUE SLD.SYS_C0025717 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 14,078
ORACLE 10G EXPLAIN PLAN FOR cursor query:-
     SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 206,103 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
     18 FILTER
          1 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) LISL.LISL_LIST_PK Cost: 2 Bytes: 8,232 Cardinality: 686
          17 UNION-ALL
               3 FILTER
                    2 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE SLD.P Cost: 26 Bytes: 72 Cardinality: 2
               16 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 574 Bytes: 157 Cardinality: 1
                    14 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 574 Bytes: 141 Cardinality: 1
                         12 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 574 Bytes: 128 Cardinality: 1
                              9 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 573 Bytes: 112 Cardinality: 1
                                   6 HASH JOIN RIGHT SEMI Cost: 563 Bytes: 315 Cardinality: 5
                                        4 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE SLD.E Cost: 80 Bytes: 223,120 Cardinality: 13,945
                                        5 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE SLD.GRP_E Cost: 481 Bytes: 3,238,582 Cardinality: 68,906
                                   8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE SLD.L Cost: 2 Bytes: 49 Cardinality: 1
                                        7 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) SLD.PK_L Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                              11 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE SLD.P Cost: 1 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 1
                                   10 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) SLD.PK_P Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
                         13 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) SLD.SYS_C0011870 Cost: 0 Bytes: 13 Cardinality: 1
                    15 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) SLD.PRP Cost: 0 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 1
so Please guide me how to reduce the time in oracle 10g for procedure?
1) Is this envrionment setting parameter?
2) I have to tune the query? but which is executing fine on oracle 9i?
so how to decrease the execution time?
Thanks in advance.

SELECT l_nr
FROM x.ls b
WHERE b.cd = '01'
AND b.co_code = '001'
AND EXISTS (
SELECT T_L
FROM g.C
WHERE C_cd = '01'
AND C_co_code = '001'
AND C_flg = 'A'
AND C_eff_dt <= sysdate
AND C_end_dt >=
sysdate
AND C_type_code <> 1
AND C_type_code <> 1
AND targt_ls_type = 'C'
AND T_L <> 9999
AND T_L = b.l_nr
UNION ALL
SELECT l.T_L
FROM g.C C,
g.ep_e B,
g.ep ep,
g.e A,
g.lk_in l
WHERE l.cd = '01'
AND l.co_code = '001'
AND l.cd = C.C_cd
AND l.co_code = C.C_co_code
AND l.C_nbr = C.C_nbr
AND l.targt_ls_type = 'C'
AND lk_in_eff_dt <=
sysdate
AND lk_in_end_dt >=
( sysdate
+ 1
AND ( (logic_delte_flg = '0')
OR ( logic_delte_flg IN ('1', '3')
AND lk_in_eff_dt <> lk_in_end_dt
AND l.cd = ep.C_cd
AND l.co_code = ep.C_co_code
AND l.C_nbr = ep.C_nbr
AND l.ep_nbr = ep.ep_nbr
AND l.cd = A.e_cd
AND l.co_code = A.e_co_code
AND l.e_nbr = A.e_nbr
AND l.cd = B.cd
AND l.co_code = B.co_code
AND l.C_nbr = B.C_nbr
AND l.ep_nbr = B.ep_nbr
AND l.e_nbr = B.e_nbr
AND l.ep_e_rev_nbr = B.ep_e_rev_nbr
AND B.flg = 'A'
AND EXISTS (
SELECT A.e_nbr
FROM g.e A
WHERE A.e_cd = B.cd
AND A.e_co_code = B.co_code
AND A.e_nbr = B.e_nbr
AND A.e_type_code ^= 8)
AND C_type_code <> 10
AND C.C_type_code <> 13
AND l.T_L = b.l_nr)
--yes index is same

Oracle 10g RAC to 11g RAC Upgrade on Solaris

Hi,
We are planning to do a migration of a 4 Node Oracle 10g RAC on Solaris 9 to 11g with Solaris 10. We'd like know what would be the best path to take. We cannot afford any downtime!
Options: Are these feasible? Which option is best? Any documents links?
a) Do a rolling upgrade of Oracle from 10g to 11g. Then take down individual nodes and upgrade the Solaris OS from 9 to 10 and bring them up back into the cluster. Is there any known issues taking this path? Is a rolling upgrade like this possible?
b) Do an upgrade of the Solaris OS from 9 to 10 on each node and then bring them back up? Is this practical? Does Oracle allow different versions of OS running on different nodes?
c) Use Dataguard with 2 different RAC environments (2 nodes each). How would this work? Is it the only possible way? Any steps please?
Thanks

a) Do a rolling upgrade of Oracle from 10g to 11g. Then take down individual nodes and upgrade the Solaris OS from 9 to 10 and bring them up back into the cluster. Is there any known issues taking this path? Is a rolling upgrade like this possible?Hi,
first of all i would not change several components (OS, database version) at a time. My recommendation is to make small steps and start with the operating system first. Seconds recommendation is to test and test everything in your dev or test environment prior doing the upgrades in the productive environment. Trust me: You will face problems :-) So you better try it beforehand!
b) Do an upgrade of the Solaris OS from 9 to 10 on each node and then bring them back up? Is this practical? Does Oracle allow different versions of OS running on different nodes?As far i know you can run different operating system versions on different nodes if they are supported (Solaris 9 and 10 are).
Ronny Egner
My blog: http://ronnyegner.wordpress.com

Upgrade Oracle 10g RAC - Oracle 11g RAC on Linux Environment

We are planning to Upgrade our databases to Oracle 10g RAC - Oracle 11g RAC which is Linux Environment. Kindly suggest me the best option for migration. Our production database size is 80GB.
- Frest installation of oracle 11g using export/iimport dumps
- Migration
- Upgrade process
Any information regarding this will be appreciated.

Pl identify exact versions of "10g" and "11g", along with the exact OS versions.
Pl see the upgrade doc - http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e23633/toc.htm
HTH
Srini

Oracle 10g Diff in execution plan query with binding var Vs without

We recently did 10g upgrade. In 10g, execution plan differs for query with binding var(thru jdbc etc) Vs without it as given below. For query with binding var,
it chooses poor execution plan(no index is used, full scan is done etc). everything worked fine in 9i. To rectify the problem, we have to hint query with right index,join etc. but i dont like this solution.
I would rather prefer to correct database to choose right execution path instead of eacy query level. but not sure what causes the issue.
Does anybody came across this issue? if so, Please share your experiences. Thanks for the help. Do let me know if you need more info.
1. Query without binding bar:
select * from test where col1 = :1 and col2 = :2
1. Query without binding bar:
select * from test where col1 = 'foo' and col2= 'bar'

I am not an expert but in my humble opinion it is the developer's responsability to ensure the correct explain plan is used before deploying code to production, if the explain plan returned by the DB is bad, then the use of a hint is perfectly acceptable.
Check this out: http://lcgapp.cern.ch/project/CondDB/snapshot/performance.html
Excerpt:
Bind variable peeking. If an SQL query contains bind variables, the optimal execution plan may depend on the values of those variables. When the Oracle query optimizer chooses the execution plan for such a query, it may indeed look at the values of all bind variables involved: this is known as "bind variable peeking".
In summary, the execution plan used for a given SQL query cannot be predicted a priori because it depends on the presence and quality of statistics and on the values of bind variables used at the time the query was first executed (hard-parsed). As a consequence of this instability of execution plans, very different performances may be observed for the same SQL query. In COOL, this issue is addressed by adding Oracle hints to the queries, to make sure that the same (good) plan is used in all cases, even with unreliable statistics or unfavourable bind variables.
Edited by: Rodolfo Ferrari on Jun 3, 2009 9:40 PM

Upgrade steps needed - Oracle 10g to Oracle 11g in RHEL 4

Hello,
Am in the process of upgrading oracle 10g with 10.1.4.3 IDM,10.1.0.5 DB and 10.1.4.2 portal version to Oracle 11g. Now I see that there are some compatibilities in the OS. I have RHEL 4 and when I check the compatibility guide I see that it is possible to install/upgrade the oracle to 11g. But am worried on the kernel and packages which is needed for Oracle 11g. If there is any step by step assistance on this please guide me. Also I have an another query can I upgrade the OS RHEL 4 to RHEL 5 and then Oracle 10g to Oracle 11g. Will I be seeing any issue after the OS upgrade with product upgrade. Kindly advise me.
R/Ganesh

This is all about libraries, some libraries between RHEL 4 and 5 had change and this may lead to malfunction of some products, cause they have been copiled using old libraries that doesn't exist now, even I think in the upgradres there are compatibility modes where let you keep old libraries, anyway seems a difficult thing to do. If you plan to move RHEL 4 to 5, I think this is your first step and then install again the Portal in the old version, and then make the upgrade, If you make this step by step, as firts install RHEL 5, install db, install portal, upgrade DB and finaly upgrade portal, would be easier. You may want to read the Master note for this upgrades in oracle Support 873751.1
Greetings.

Upgrade Oracle from Oracle9i to Oracle 10g

Hi,
We will be having a project on upgrading the existing version of Oracle 9i to 10g.
Our application uses Java as the front end and Oracle as the backend.
So if anyone has done similar kind of Oracle upgrade from 9i to 10g, could you please tell us –
1) What are the steps involved in upgrading Java drivers (if any).
2) Also any other changes to be made on Java front.
Thank you,
DNN

_> user10650608 wrote:__> it depends on the application, I think_
_>_
_> I would do it that way:_
_> 1. install a 10g database_
_> 2. full export of the 9i database_
_> 3. full import into the 10g_
_> 4. test the application_
_>_
_> simple ;-), normally the producer of the java-software has a upgrade-plan, just ask the producer_
I have the following queries:
1. Does any third-party application running on Oracle 9i Enterprise Edition need to be changed when we migrate from 9i database server to Oracle Standard One Edition 10g?
2. What's the difference between Oracle 9i Enterprise and Oracle Standard One Edition 10g?
3. We are using Oracle 9i Database on a server with Oracle 9i Client on nodes with third-party software. When we upgrade our 9i server to 10g, can we connect to 10g from our existing 9i client nodes? Slowly we can upgrade all 9i clients to 10g clients. Otherwise, all the machines in the company need to be changed to 10g client and work will suffer a lot, as this upgrade job cannot be done in a single day.

Upgrade oracle 8i (32bit) to oracle 10g (64bit)

Hi,
I have to upgrade oracle from Oracle 8i (32bit) to oracle 10g (64bit).
Do you have a note to help me ?
Are there problems ?
Thank you,
Philippe

Bharatwaj,
We have ECC 5 running on HP Unix.
I am planning to upgrade from 9.2.0.7 to 10.2.0.2.
I read that you have already done this in your environment.
can you please share with me
- steps that you have followed
- Issues you have faced if any during upgrade and after upgrade
- Issues / Risks with application after 10g upgarde
Thank you very much in advance.
Best Wishes,
Rajasekaran G.

We have plan to windows 2008 server ECC5(is reatil) oracle 10G.

Dear all
Presently we are using winwos 2003 server enter prize edition ,ECC5(is
retails), oracle 9.2.0.7.
we have plan to windows 2008 server ECC5(is reatil) oracle 10G.
Is windows 2008 suported to the ECC5 (is-Reatail) and oracle 10G .
if supported please advise windows 2003 server is better or windos 2008 server better .
Thanks
Edited by: Venkat Ramesh on Aug 18, 2008 9:47 AM

ECC 5 is based on kernel 6.40 which is not (yet) released for Windows 2008.
See also note 1054740 - SAP System Installation on Windows Server 2008
I would recommend installing on Windows 2003 and later upgrade your system to Windows 2008 when kernel 6.40 is available.
Markus

Oracle 10G Upgrade planning

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for