Oracle@grp1 process is too high

Dear all,
We have a 10g RAC setup. We also installed HP OpenView for monitoring. There is always an oracle process names oracle@instance1_name that takes more than 40% of a single processor ( we have 16 processor on each node). how can i get what this session is doing & why it takes this much time.
Regards;

Dear Tomy3k_Bakr!
You may use gv$process and gv$session to identify this process. Get the PID of this process and try the following query:
SELECT inst_id, username, program, sid, serial#, command, server, osuser, process
FROM gv$process p, gv$session s
WHERE p.ADDR = s.SADDR;This should give you information about about what oracle@instance1_name is.
Yours sincerely
Florian W.

Similar Messages

Oracle Instances Processes consuming too much memory

Will somebody be able to guide me with the factors that are causing too much memory consumption when a single Oracle.exe instance is started ? Due to this problem it is not possible to run 2 instances at the same time.
Oracle is running on Windows NT 4.0 SP6.
Oracle version 8.1.6.0.0
Currently we have 512MBytes of ram.(4.83G free space)
One of the Instance consumes as much as 178,320K of Ram,
another consumes about 138,000K

Oracle consumes as much memory as you want, but more memory is faster.
Review your init.ora (db_block_buffer y shared_pool_size)
(It4s posible to run 10 instances in a machine with just 1 Gigabyte and they work fine. It depends on the use of the databases, the number of users, just for production or development, etc, ...).

Update work process has too high respose time.

Our functional team is facing issue while saving data in va03 transaction. IT prompts Sales order saved successfully and when we go to va02 and try to open getting error Document "SD document not in database or has been archived"
So when I checked sm66 update WP is on hold due to RFC response. and in st03 it has high response time
Task          steps response time                                             wait time
UPDATE2    2       1.130,0               335,0    65,0    724,0    0,0    0,0                0,0    0,0    70,5
UPDATE    29        1.188.035,2       19,6    8,6    35,9    0,0         1.187.979,4    0,0    0,0    0,3
Also in SM13 all updates are at Initial status. Nothing get updated in database.
Please help as functional team is no more able to work and as basis person We need to resolve the same.

Hi Spr,
Please check the following
1) Update has status active in SM13
2) You have enough space in the oraarch directory
3) You have enough space in tablespaces
4) Check for any error message on in alert_<SID>.log file
5) Update oracle dictionary, missing and all statistics in the database.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

ORACLE dispatcher process running high cpu (100%)

Hi:
I'm running Apex 4 on database Oracle 11g 11.2.0.2.0. The cpu consumption is really high after a while. Oracle Dispatcher process goes 100% cpu for very long time.
Anyone here had the same problem? I'm created more dispatchers to workaround this issue but the problem is not solved. At oracle support seams there's a bug about this issue 14106948, but no solution yet.
Anyone with same problem? Any solution?
Thanks
Ricardo

Your problem may not be exactly the same as that of the original poster of this thread, and it can be very confusing for everybody if we try to answer more than one question in each thread.
In order for us to give your problem our undivided attention to try to solve it, would you kindly start your own thread, describing the trouble you are having in the fullest detail, including completing your details to show what Mac you are using, what operating system, and what version of the application in question.

Oracle Berkeley DB Java Edition High Availability (White Paper)

Hi all,
I've just read Oracle Berkeley DB Java Edition High Availability White Paper
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/berkeleydb/berkeleydb-je-ha-whitepaper-132079.pdf
In section "Time Consistency Policy" (Page 18) it is written:
"Setting a lag period that is too small, given the load and available hardware resources, could result in
frequent timeout exceptions and reduce a replica's availability for read operations. It could also increase
the latency associated with read requests, as the replica makes the read transaction wait so that it can
catch up in the replication stream."
Can you tell me why those read operations will not be taken by the master ?
Why will we have frequent timeout ?
Why should read transaction wait instead of being redirect to the master ?
Why should it reduce replica's availability for read operations ?
Thanks

Please post this question on the Berkeley DB Java Edition (BDB JE) forum Berkeley DB Java Edition. This is the Berkeley DB Core (BDB) forum.
Thanks,
Andrei

ORA-25307: Enqueue rate too high, flow control enabled

I am stuck. I have my stream setup and they were previously working on two of my dev environments well. Now when I get the streams setup the CAPTURE process has a state of "CAPTURING CHANGES" for like 10 seconds and then changes to state "PAUSED FOR FLOW CONTROL". I believe this is happening because the PROPAGATION process is showing an error of "ORA-25307: Enqueue rate too high, flow control enabled".
I don't know what to tweak to get rid of this error message. The two environments are dev databases and there is minimal activity on them so i don't think it's a case of the APPLY process is lagging behind the PROPAGATION process. Has anyone run into this issue?? I've verified my db link works, my stream admin user has dba access. Any help or advise would be greatly appreciated.
thanks, dave

As rule of thumb, you don't need to set GLOBAL_NAME=TRUE as long as your are 100% GLOBAL_NAME compliant.
So, setting GLOBAL_NAME=TRUE will not have any effect if your dblink is not global_name compliant
and if your installation is global_name compliant, you don't need to set GLOBAL_NAME=TRUE.
The first thing when you diagnose is to get the exact facts.
Please run this queries both on source and target so that to see what are in the queues and where.
Run it multiple time to see if figures evolves.
- If they are fixed, then your Streams is stuck in its last stage. As a cheap and good starting point, just stop/start the capture, propagation and target apply process. Check also the alert.log on both site. when you have a propagation problem, they do contains information's. If you have re-bounced everything and no improvement then the real diagnose work must start here but then we know that the message is wrong and the problems is elsewhere.
- if they are not fixed then your apply really lag behind for what ever good reason, but this is usually easy to find.
set termout off
col version new_value version noprint
col queue_table format A26 head 'Queue Table'
col queue_name format A32 head 'Queue Name'
select substr(version,1,instr(version,'.',1)-1) version from v$instance;
col mysql new_value mysql noprint
col primary_instance format 9999 head 'Prim|inst'
col secondary_instance format 9999 head 'Sec|inst'
col owner_instance format 99 head 'Own|inst'
COLUMN MEM_MSG HEADING 'Messages|in Memory' FORMAT 99999999
COLUMN SPILL_MSGS HEADING 'Messages|Spilled' FORMAT 99999999
COLUMN NUM_MSGS HEADING 'Total Messages|in Buffered Queue' FORMAT 99999999
set linesize 150
select case
when &version=9 then ' distinct a.QID, a.owner||''.''||a.name nam, a.queue_table,
              decode(a.queue_type,''NORMAL_QUEUE'',''NORMAL'', ''EXCEPTION_QUEUE'',''EXCEPTION'',a.queue_type) qt,
              trim(a.enqueue_enabled) enq, trim(a.dequeue_enabled) deq, x.bufqm_nmsg msg, b.recipients
              from dba_queues a , sys.v_$bufqm x, dba_queue_tables b
        where
               a.qid = x.bufqm_qid (+) and a.owner not like ''SYS%''
           and a.queue_table = b.queue_table (+)
           and a.name not like ''%_E'' '
   when &version=10 then ' a.owner||''.''|| a.name nam, a.queue_table,
              decode(a.queue_type,''NORMAL_QUEUE'',''NORMAL'', ''EXCEPTION_QUEUE'',''EXCEPTION'',a.queue_type) qt,
              trim(a.enqueue_enabled) enq, trim(a.dequeue_enabled) deq, (NUM_MSGS - SPILL_MSGS) MEM_MSG, spill_msgs, x.num_msgs msg,
              x.INST_ID owner_instance
              from dba_queues a , sys.gv_$buffered_queues x
        where
               a.qid = x.queue_id (+) and a.owner not in ( ''SYS'',''SYSTEM'',''WMSYS'') order by a.owner ,qt desc'
   end mysql
from dual
set termout on
select &mysql
/B. Polarski

PGC...data rate too high

Hallo,
message
nunew33, "Mpeg not valid error message" #4, 31 Jan 2006 3:29 pm describes a certain error message. The user had problems with an imported MPEG movie.
Now I receive the same message, but the MPEG that is causing the problem is created by Encore DVD itself!?
I am working with the german version, but here is a rough translation of the message:
"PGC 'Weitere Bilder' has an error at 00:36:42:07.
The data rate of this file is too high for DVD. You must replace the file with one of a lower data rate. - PGC Info: Name = Weitere Bilder, Ref = SApgc, Time = 00:36:42:07"
My test project has two menus and a slide show with approx. 25 slides and blending as transition. The menus are ok, I verified that before.
First I thought it was a problem with the audio I use in the slide show. Because I am still in the state of learning how to use the application, I use some test data. The audio tracks are MP3s. I learned already that it is better to convert the MP3s to WAV files with certain properties.
I did that, but still the DVD generation was not successful.
Then I deleted all slides from the slide show but the first. Now the generation worked!? As far as a single slide (an image file) can not have a bitrate per second, and there was no sound any more, and as far as the error message appears AFTER the slide shows are generated, while Encore DVD is importing video and audio just before the burning process, I think that the MPEG that is showing the slide show is the problem.
But this MPEG is created by Encore DVD itself. Can Encore DVD create Data that is not compliant to the DVD specs?
The last two days I had to find out the cause for a "general error". Eventually I found out that image names must not be too long. Now there is something else, and I still have to just waste time for finding solutions for apparent bugs in Encore DVD. Why doesn't the project check find and tell me such problems? Problem is that the errors appear at the end of the generation process, so I always have to wait for - in my case - approx. 30 minutes.
If the project check would have told me before that there are files with file names that are too long, I wouldn't have had to search or this for two days.
Now I get this PGC error (what is PGC by the way?), and still have no clue, cause again the project check didn't mention anything.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Christian Kirchhoff

Hallo,
thanks, Ruud and Jeff, for your comments.
The images are all scans of ancient paintings. And they are all rather dark. They are not "optimized", meaning they are JPGs right now (RGB), and they are bigger then the resolution for PAL 3:4 would require. I just found out that if I choose "None" as scaling, there is no error, and the generation of the DVD is much, much faster.
A DVD with a slide show containing two slides and a 4 second transition takes about 3 minutes to generate when the scaling is set to something other than "None". Without scaling it takes approx. 14 seconds. The resulting movies size is the same (5,35 MB).
I wonder why the time differs so much. Obviously the images have to be scaled to the target size. But it seems that the images are not scaled only once, that those scaled versions of the source images are cached, and those cached versions are used to generate then blend effect, but for every frame the source images seem to be scaled again.
So I presume that the scaling - unfortunately - has an effect on the resulting movie, too, and thus influences the success of the process of DVD generation.
basic situation:
good image > 4 secs blend > bad image => error
variations:
other blend times don't cause an error:
good image > 2 secs blend > bad image => success
good image > 8 secs blend > bad image => success
other transitions cause an error, too:
good image > 4 secs fade to black > bad image => error
good image > 4 secs page turn > bad image => error
changing the image order prevents the error:
bad image > 4 secs blend > good image => success
changing the format of the bad image to TIFF doesn't prevent the error.
changing colors/brightness of the bad image: a drastic change prevents the error. I adjusted the histogram and made everything much lighter.
Just a gamma correction with values between 1.2 and 2.0 didn't help.
changing the image size prevents the error. I decreased the size. The resulting image was still bigger than the monitor area, thus it still had to be scaled a bit by Encore DVD, but with this smaller version the error didn't occur. The original image is approx. 2000 px x 1400 px. Decreasing the size by 50% helped. Less scaling (I tried 90%, 80%, 70% and 60%, too) didn't help.
using a slightly blurred version (gaussian blur, 2 px, in Photoshop CS) of the bad image prevents the error.
My guess is that the error depends on rather subtle image properties. The blur doesn't change the images average brightness, the balance of colors or the size of the image, but still the error was gone afterwards.
The problem is that I will work with slide shows that contain more images than two. It would be too time consuming to try to generate the DVD over and over again, look at which slide an error occurs, change that slide, and then generate again. Even the testing I am doing right now already "ate" a couple of days of my working time.
Only thing I can do is to use a two image slide show and test image couple after image couple. If n is the number of images, I will spend (n - 1) times 3 minutes (which is the average time to create a two slides slide how with a blend). But of course I will try to prepare the images and make them as big as the monitor resolution, so Encore DVD doesn't have to scale the images any more. That'll make the whole generation process much shorter.
If I use JPGs or TIFFs, the pixel aspect ratio is not preserved when the image is imported. I scaled one of the images in Photoshop, using a modified menu file that was installed with Encore DVD, because it already has the correct size for PAL, the pixel aspect ratio and the guides for the save areas. I saved the image as TIFF and as PSD and imported both into Encore DVD. The TIFF is rendered with a 1:1 pixel aspect ratio and NOT with the D1/DV PAL aspect ration that is stored in the TIFF. Thus the image gets narrowed and isn't displayed the way I wanted it any more. Only the PSD looks correct. But I think I saw this already in another thread...
I cannot really understand why the MPEG encoding engine would produce bit rates that are illegal and that are not accepted afterwards, when Encore DVD is putting together all the stuff. Why is the MPEG encoding engine itself not throwing an error during the encoding process? This would save the developer so much time. Instead they have to wait until the end, thinking everything went right, and find out then that there was a problem.
Still, if sometime somebody finds out more about the whole matter I would be glad about further explanations.
Best regards,
Christian

PGC has an error--data rate of this file is too high for DVD

Getting one of those seemingly elusive PGC errors, though mine seems to be different from many of the ones listed here. Mine is telling me that the data rate of my file is too high for DVD. Only problem is, the file it's telling me has a datarate that is too high, is a slideshow which Encore has built using imported jpg files. I got the message, tried going into the slideshow and deleting the photo at the particular spot in the timeline where it said it had the problem, now getting the same message again with a different timecode spot in the same slideshow. The pictures are fairly big, but I assumed that Encore would automatically resize them to fit an NTSC DVD timeline. Do I need to open all the pictures in Photoshop and scale them down to 720x480 before I begin with the slideshows?

With those efforts, regarding the RAM, it would *seem* that physical memory was not the problem.
I'd look to how Windows is managing both the RAM addresses and also its Virtual Memory. To the former, I've seen programs/Processes that lock certain memory addresses upon launch (may be in startup), and do not report this to Windows accurately. Along those lines, you might want to use Task Manager to see what Processes are running from startup on your machine. I'll bet that you've got some that are not necessary, even if IT is doing a good job with the system setup. One can use MSCONFIG to do a trial of the system, without some of these.
I also use a little program, EndItAll2 for eliminating all non-necessary programs and Processes, when doing editing. It's freeware, has a tiny footprint and usually does a perfect job of surveying your running programs and Processes, to shut them down. You can also modify its list, incase it wants to shut down something that IS necessary. I always Exit from my AV, spyware, popup-blocker, etc., as these progams will lie to EndItAll2 and say that they ARE necessary, as part of their job. Just close 'em out in the Tasktray, then run EndItAll2. Obviously, you'll need to do this with the approval of IT, but NLE machines need all available resources.
Now, to the Virtual Memory. It is possible that Windows is not doing a good job of managing a dynamic Page File. Usually, it does, but many find there is greater stability with a fixed size at about 1.5 to 2.5x the physical RAM. I use the upper end with great results. A static Page File also makes defragmenting the HDD a bit easier too. I also have my Page File split over two physical HDD's. Some find locating to, say D:\ works best. For whatever reason, my XP-Pro SP3 demanded that I have it on C:\, or split between C:\ and D:\. Same OS on my 3 HDD laptop was cool having it on D:\ only. Go figure.
These are just some thoughts.
Glad that you got part of it solved and good luck with the next part. Since this seems to affect both PrPro and En, sounds system related.
Hunt
PS some IT techs love to add all sorts of monitors to the computers, especially if networkded. These are not usually bad, but are usually out of the mainstream, in that most users will never have most of these. You might want to ask about any monitors. Also, are you the only person with an NLE computer under the IT department? In major business offices, this often happens. Most IT folk do not have much, if any, experience with graphics, or NLE workstations. They spend their days servicing database, word processing and spreadsheet boxes.

Ms word95 to pdf - "security level too high"?

I'm a brand new user of Acrobat 9.0 (on XP system) - all kinds of problems (including major file crash and loss during 9.0 installation - more on that later). for now, I need to get started immediately on converting some MS Word doc files to pdfs - What I get from 9.0 is the message that "The Security Level is Too High". If it's referring to the MS word docs, they are unprotected (I've checked and tried several - Word shows they are not protected, and as far as I know, never have been). They were originally created on a mac with macWord - but were not protected and converted to windows with MacDrive7. They show in MS Word in good condition and unprotected. What do I need to do to get them into acrobat and into pdf format? I've also check the knowledge base here and elswhere without any clues except one chap who seemed to be having similar problems (along with serious crashes) using 8.1. Other than that, I'm mistified.
I've also tried using the context menu 'covert to pdf' method and also creating a new pdf (blank) and inserting them. In both cases the security message aborted the process. Need to do this right away. I'm not technically skilled, so if someone can give me some clear instructions I'd be grateful. - red

Thank you all for responding so quickly. First, I'll mention the serious message and a warning. DO NOT INSTALL ACROBAT 9.0 IN AN ENVIRONMENT WITH WORD 7.0 (or any old(er) MS Word version before 2k). The consequences are ghastly, including the deletion of half or more of your program files (including your email clients, av software and other primary programs), the corruption of your browser, registry (including restore points) and other not so nice events - worse than most bad viruses. That's a problem Adobe and I will probably be taking a look at next week. Mean time, they indicate that they are going to add the matter to their KB and elswhere so that users have a heads-up on the issue.
As for the conversion problem from Word 7.0 .doc to .pdf - Bill, you just about nailed it. It was, indeed, a problem that could be circumvented by going to the printer dialog and setting the printer to 'Adobe pdf file' (something a novice wouldn't think of, nor line tech-support for that matter.). As far as Word/pdf 'printer' is concerned you're just printing the file. However, as I understand things, that's how Adobe attaches the Word documents - It does it through the printer interface. Once that setting is changed to 'Adobe pdf printer' the file is simply picked from the print queue (or before) and loaded into A9. Save it from A9, and the job is done. So, Bill, If Adobe hadn't found the answer, I do believe you would have been telling me exactly how to do it after a few more posts. The credit, though, goes to Neo Johnson, tech-support supervisor in New Delhi. The last two days (almost 9 hours of phone time) were spent with various tech-support agents at Adobe; but, he was the one who finely thought about the interaction between A9 and Word and figured it out.
Ok -that's the brief. The rest is a little history/background for whomever is interested (skip, otherwise - not important). The problem begins with failure to install - first, setup can't find the msi file - it was there, and I browsed it, so that was solved. Then 'invalid licensing - process stopped' messages appear. That was a little tougher and http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405970.html and some other articles had me doing repair, reinstall, and other complex (for me) procedures. One of the problems was that flexnet had failed to install, which was a stumper for me (I couldn't find it to download separately - barely knew what it was/did - and finally understood that Adobe was supposed to install it. After that, I did several uninstalls, to no effect. Finally I did a few moderate and then deep uninstalls (with Revo) and several reinstalls. Things got progressively worse. On one reboot, my desktop came up and all the program icons were broken links. I examined targets and such and then went to my 'program files' directory. To my horror, nearly all my primary program (including thunderbird email client, AVG etc.) files had disappeared. The folders were simply empty. Firefox still loaded, but the tabs were non functional. Several checks and some light disc analysis indicated the files vanished. No trace. However, my document folders and data were intact (also backed-up). I went to restore and found that all the old restore points (including the one's Revo sets before uninstalling) were gone. If it had been a virus, it couldn't have done a better job at making a mess of things. At that point, I knew the registry had been toasted and I was facing a complete OS reinstall. Instead, I opted for reinstalling some of the critical programs (and because the document files appeared to be intact). After the first few - thunderbird, firefox etc. - I was relieve to find that they were picking up on the old settings and restoring themselves to their previous states. I still have a number of these to do - and a few must be re-configured. But that's going ok.
Then the saga of Adobe, several phone calls; several times the phone connection was cut off and I had to call again and start over from the beginning with a new person. The matter always had to be esculated to the next tier - more time, more cues, no solutions. They went over the firefox settings, the adobe settings. They were puzzled about the broken links. Attempts to open doc files (after a fresh install of winword) were resulting in 'invalid win32 application'. All kinds of problems made progress difficult. We cleared up the 'invalid....' messages by reparing the file associations (in XP folder options) and then opening the docs in Word and resaving them as something else. It was a labor. Finally, there was simply no answer except, like the post here, Word 7 is simply too old and uses different scripting. The only solution was to either buy (ugh, ouch!) Word 2007 (and hope that it would load them and save them in A9 useable form) or, try installing Word2k (which I have) and processing them through that; and, then using Acrobat 8.x to load those and save the pdfs for A9 to use. However, when Adobe said they could not provide me with a free (even trial) version of 8.x to do the job - licensing problems etc. -- It seemed like a really ugly solution. Finally, I'm begging Adobe to give me a free copy of 8.x and in steps Neo. He can't provide the free copy, but he asks a few questions himself. We go to Adobe and reset some of the security settings (something other agents didn't know or think of). No dice - still can't load the docs. But then he says, Open up Word. Ok. load the file and then hit 'print' - ok, the print dialog comes up. 'Now,' he says, 'open the properties and see what printers are listed.' Ok I do that, and I'll be... 'Adobe pdf printer' is among them. "Just what I thought," he said, Adobe was hooking up with word, but didn't have its printer to attach." So we set 'Adobe pdf' as the printer and lo and behold, the docs loaded into Adobe as pdfs. End of that story. (so bill, you had it too - wish you had answered the phone in the first place!)
Clean up. So, there's a few simple solutions, I think (though i'm no techie and you folks will certainly have better ideas). First, I don't buy the story that early versions of Word are either 1) unsupported by MS or, 2) nobody uses them, as valid reasons why not to fix the problem of the "unloadable" docs. I figure there are at least a couple of aproaches and easy patches that will correct the matter. One is from the Word side - to is to set the current printer setting to use 'Adobe printer', get the file and then reset the printer back to what it was - default. The other is to patch A9 to detect legacy source applications and bypass things that would normally make the file unloadable, unless, of course, they were actually protected or, read only files. In that case, Adobe could simply inform the user to 'unprotect' them, the same as it now does with its 'Security Setting too High' message for later versions. I'm sure there are even better ways. But, that would fix things as far as file loading and conversion.
As to the installation and crash problems - those need to be addressed. Even if its only a few dozen people that might have the same problem, it needs 1) to be given as a noticable warning and keyword in Adobe documents (which now simply indicate that it can process .doc files); 2) it needs to be examined to insure systems that have Word 7.x or older can install without problem, and certainly without harming their system. Adobe has a good reputation and does a good job. That's worth protecting with all customers, even if Marketing can't quite see why and the bean counters can't find much profit in the task. It's what I expect from professionals and to do less certainly subtracts from Adobe's standing. That should be worth a great deal, I would imagine.
Anyway, thanks folks - got to get some sleept, and then get those pdfs done and sent to people who are waiting for them. - best to you all, red.

Newbie: does Oracle BPEL Process Manager support http-get/post binding?

Hi all,
i'm a newbie in using bpel4ws. Two things i must know before using the Oracle BPEL Process Manager:
1. Does the manager support the sub-specification bpel4ws?
2. I want to orchestrate some services which aren't binded using http-SOAP or rpc. They are binded using http-GET and http-POST. Does the manager support these bindings too?

Hi Clemens,
thanks for answering.
Ähhm... as i told you, i'm newbie here. I searched for the content of
samples/tutorials/702.bindings/http
But i'm afraid i don't know where to start. Its no URL and i didn't find the source of this path. Can you add the full URL or tell me how to get to the source of these samples?
thanks
Albrecht

Archive log writes frequency rate (4.73 minute(s)) is too high

hello,
DB version=10.2.0.1.0
OS sun Solaris 5.10
i got one alert telling
Archive log writes frequency rate (4.73 minute(s)) is too high could someone help me out to know what is this error and what causingit to occure?
thanks

Raman wrote:
please go throrgh this URL
http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_redo_log_tuning.htm
Well, the first step on that is wrong. The link in the step corrects it. However, both pages advocate putting redo logs on SSD, and if you google about for recent blog postings about that, you see that that is a bad idea. Even on Exadata, it only works because it is also writing to normal spinning rust, and says the write to redo is done when the first write is acknowledged. For normal non-Exadata databases, it's at best an expensive waste of time, and at worst shows up the deterioration of SSD's as redo log corruption. So, you might not want to link there.
You should size the redo for the data rate expected at maximum, and use the parameters CKPT mentioned to switch for normal operating data rates.

SYSTEM IDLE PROCESS SHOWING TOO MUCH CPU USAGE

I Have problem with system idle process showing too much cpu usage.but the process is normal.nothing more else.my laptop is toshiba satelite pro m300.pls give the solution as earliest as possible.

Without knowing the excat model or what software, hardware or external components are running CPU usage is just an average measurement. If you have alot of background components/software running can cause a high reading, as it you allowed updating to runn consistently, or IM Messenger to consistently gain access.

Are these settings too high?

All I did was click on the Performance 3D in the settings of Clock Frequencies of my FX5600 128MB. I then clicked on Auto detect and it changed my settings all by itself. I did not manually move any of the sliders.
My Core Clock Frequency for 2D is now 270MHz and 3D is 372MHz.
So far, America's Army plays way better and I was even able to bump up many of the games settings too.
Are these settings too high?
Graphics Processor Properties
Video Adapter   nVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 (MSI FX5600)
GPU Code Name   NV31
PCI Device   10DE / 0312
Transistors   75 million
Process Technology   0.13u
Bus Type   AGP
Memory Size   128 MB
GPU Clock   270 MHz
RAMDAC Clock   400 MHz
Pixel Pipelines   4
TMU Per Pipeline   1
Vertex Shaders   4 (v2.0)
Pixel Shaders   1 (v2.0)
DirectX Hardware Support   DirectX v9.0
Pixel Fillrate   1080 MPixel/s
Texel Fillrate   1080 MTexel/s
Memory Bus Properties
Bus Type   DDR
Bus Width   128-bit
Real Clock   324 MHz (DDR)
Effective Clock   648 MHz
Bandwidth   10368 MB/s
Graphics Processor Manufacturer
Company Name   NVIDIA Corporation
Product Information   http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=products
Driver Download   http://www.nvidia.com/drivers

Both, but primarily the GPU will generate the most heat, either way, heat is a killer no matter how you look at it. Even if it is warm to the touch, that does not mean it's harmless. If it's warmer than the component manufacturer specs indicate, it shortens the life. As to the rate in which heat above a certain range actually shortens the life is better left to an electronics engineer or a spec sheet.
Do not overclock in 2d mode it's not necessary.
Probably not an issue if you have good cooling in your case and the ambient room temp is respectable.
If you want to overclock, let the 3d detect set it initially and then take the overall speed and reduce it by 5% or so. You may not notice failure right away if your eye is not trained to see the problems. So it's best to be conservative if you are not an experienced overclocker.
"Forget about performance in benchmarks and play the game"

One process generating too much archives

Hi all,
DB-Oracle 9.2
OS- Aix
One of my friend ask me how to find out which process generating too mcuh archive logs
below are some of the parameters
log_checkpoint_interval integer 30000
log_checkpoint_timeout integer 1800
log_checkpoints_to_alert boolean FALSE
log_buffer 1048576
log_archive_max_processes 2
fast_start_mttr_target 0please suggest me

hi,
you have killed the seesion.. but insert operations are not needed or what? if you don't want any insert from that user then give priveleges acccordingly.
coz, the import may be needed for some application. or else increase the redo log files.
to find which process
check the holding session from dba_waiter and check whether the session using any insert or update statement..(find the query).. even u can check from ps-ef |grep arch..
instead of killing you can do any other alteration or inform user to import at a less consuption DB time..
regards,
Deepak

Help. trying to burn a dvd from fcpx. says bitrate too high

I'm using fcpx for a montage with effects like generators etc...not sure if this is why it says bitrate too high. I want to burn a dvd and it stops at 66% saying bitrate too high. I've seen an answer from 2011....wondering if anyone has anything new? My computer is Mac book pro 15 inch, latest software. I went to compressor but the final product doesn't allow me to put in a title and i'm worried about final quality. Thanks for any help

I would say usually it's about the same. If the settings are adjusted properly, it can sometimes improve the results; conversely, there's always the potential to get terrible results if the settings are wrong. (FCP X Share kind of takes that risk out of the process.)
Where the software can often add value is when you have long videos that you're trying to fit on a disk. Or trying to compress certain HD material with complex scenes. Or sometimes, you'll run into players that choke on a DVD and the adjustments in Compressor give you a chance to adjust the bit rate to a level that widens the disk's playability. And there are audio and video effects that can be added in Compressor without re-editing in FCP.
BTW, I don't believe you've yet told us how long your project is.
Russ

Oracle@grp1 process is too high

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for