Oracle VM 3.1.1 and local repository

Hi there,
I have created one LUN hardware RAID 10 for 4x300G SAS disks, and then installed Oracle VM Server 3.1.1, during the installation I determined the remaining space on sda for Oracle VM repository on partition sda2 mounted on directory /OVS OCFS2 file system, installation completed successfully, and then I installed Oracle VM Manager 3.1.1 on a separate machine it is installed and working fine.
Now, Oracle VM Manager discover the Oracle VM server smoothly but unable to detect that remaining space on /OVS, my question how to use this remaining space for Oracle VM repository as I read on the new release document "Release Notes" : said that this issue is fixed with this release and mentioned it as bug in their previous version. I wish if any ideas or workaround to fix this issue as I always hope, there is a manual intervention to solve this issue and want at the same time to keep performance benefit of RIAD 10 configuration.
Thanks in advance,

Sorry, you get to do it over.
You must install the Local Repository on an unused, complete, unpartitioned LUN of it's own. Build about a 50G LUN for Oracle VM and and additional LUN for the remaining terabyte. OVM will then see the space and utilize the repo. Create a non-clustered Server Pool.
You can put OVM in much smaller space, but I like to have "extra" (add a /dev/sda4 and mkfs on it) stuff on my OS disks. If you don't want to do that, OVM fits nicely in 5G. I"d give it 10G for growth with later upgrades, however.

Similar Messages

Difference between Central and Local Repository

Dear Experts:
I'm relatively new to Data Integrator world. The question I have is around setting up a new Central Repository. As I understand, the steps involved in creating a central repository are:
1. Setup as a DI account (e.g. PRODREPO)
2. Create Central Repository tables
My question is how does the DI application know that PRODREPO is a central repository and not a local. What differentiates a local vs. central repository?
Any help or pointers is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.

repository type is stored in the DI repository, using which all DI application differentiate a local, profiler, central repository
certain functions are not applicable to central repo like Job Execution, Login from Designer, Adding to Job Server

Changing CMS and Audit Repository databases from Oracle to SQl server 2008

Hi guys,
We have a Business Objects Dev environment which was installed with Oracle 10g database for CMS and Audit Repository.
Our database team now decided to change the CMS and Audit databases of Dev BOE from Oracle to SQL server 2008.
What is the ideal way to achieve this? I'm concerned because the old DB is Oracle and the new one would be SQL server.
Earlier, I have changed CMS database from one to another by stopping SIA , taking the backup of old DB into new and changing it in the Update Databse option. But in that case both old and new CMS databses were on SQL server 2005.
Thanks,
Ganga

Denise,
Thanks for the solution.
We have done Windows AD and SAP integration on the Dev BOE. Will there be any issue with those after the DB change. I am guessing there won't be, but just want to confirm. Please reply.
Also, we need to stop the old SIA and start using the new SIA after the step two is done right?

Local repository on Oracle VM Manager, then yum check-update itself

Hi.
I have one Oracle VM Manager server as Oracle Linux 6.2 x86_64 that ULN registerd.
To update my Oracle VM Servers I set up local yum repository on my Oracle VM Manager, and it works OK with my Oracle VM Server Upgrade.
(Here is nice documents: http://itnewscast.com/oracle-vm-patch-updates )
However when I run "yum check-update" to keep secure OL6 itslef on my Oracle VM Manager, it shows update for el5 (not el6) as below;
ethtool.x86_64 2:2.6.33-0.3.100.1.el5 ovm3_x86_64_latest
kernel-uek.x86_64 2.6.39-200.1.1.el5uek ovm3_x86_64_latest
kernel-uek-firmware.noarch 2.6.39-200.1.1.el5uek ovm3_x86_64_latest
pciutils.x86_64 3.1.7-5.el5 ovm3_x86_64_latest
python-urlgrabber.noarch 3.9.1-9.100.1.el5 ovm3_x86_64_latest
unzip.x86_64 6.0-3.100.1.el5 ovm3_x86_64_latest
I can run as 'yum --disablerepo="ovm3_x86_64_latest" check-update' to ignore above updates, but is there any way more smart?

I installed this patch to see if it would fix the problem I'm having, which is:
After a fresh install of 3.1.1 on two servers and the manager, everything worked fine until I rebooted the servers the first time. Then they came up in the "starting" state, and stay there. The error messages from the discovery process say something like "com.oracle.ovm.mgr.api.exception.IllegalOperationException: If the IP address of this server has changed, please delete the server: toravm2.acbl.net, and re-discover."
The servers have certainly not changed any hardware or IP addresses. They were just installed!
Anyhow, the installation of Build 365 and reboot of the servers fixed ONE of them. But the other one is still stuck in the "starting" state, and is UNUSABLE.
Any idea what the discovery process might be seeing that would cause this?

Subversion: Cannot import files into a local repository

If following the directions from here:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/htdocs/partners/addins/exchange/subversion/subversion.html
I've got the local repository created and can successfully connect to it, but when it try to import files is get a popup saying "Unable to import source files into the Subversion repository at svn://localhost."
This is the stack trace:
org.tigris.subversion.svnclientadapter.SVNClientException: org.tigris.subversion.javahl.ClientException: svn: 170001: Authorization failed
     at org.tigris.subversion.svnclientadapter.javahl.AbstractJhlClientAdapter.doImport(AbstractJhlClientAdapter.java:700)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.vcs.svn.imp.SVNImportWizard.executeImport(SVNImportWizard.java:476)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.vcs.svn.imp.SVNImportWizard.commitWizard(SVNImportWizard.java:204)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.vcs.svn.imp.SVNImportWizard.mav$commitWizard(SVNImportWizard.java:78)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.vcs.svn.imp.SVNImportWizard$3$1.run(SVNImportWizard.java:137)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Caused by: org.tigris.subversion.javahl.ClientException: svn: 170001: Authorization failed
     at org.tigris.subversion.javahl.JavaHLObjectFactory.throwException(JavaHLObjectFactory.java:435)
     at org.tmatesoft.svn.core.javahl.SVNClientImpl.throwException(SVNClientImpl.java:1224)
     at org.tmatesoft.svn.core.javahl.SVNClientImpl.doImport(SVNClientImpl.java:601)
     at org.tigris.subversion.svnclientadapter.javahl.AbstractJhlClientAdapter.doImport(AbstractJhlClientAdapter.java:696)
     ... 5 more
I'm using JDeveloper 10.1.3.0.4.3673 and Subversion 1.4.6. Please advise.

Thank you so much for your help. With some deeper googling, i found some info on editing the svnserve.conf file. That fixed my authentication issue. But alas, there is a new problem: Same popup, new stack trace:
org.tigris.subversion.svnclientadapter.SVNClientException: org.tigris.subversion.javahl.ClientException: svn: Malformed network data
     at org.tigris.subversion.svnclientadapter.javahl.AbstractJhlClientAdapter.doImport(AbstractJhlClientAdapter.java:700)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.vcs.svn.imp.SVNImportWizard.executeImport(SVNImportWizard.java:476)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.vcs.svn.imp.SVNImportWizard.commitWizard(SVNImportWizard.java:204)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.vcs.svn.imp.SVNImportWizard.mav$commitWizard(SVNImportWizard.java:78)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.vcs.svn.imp.SVNImportWizard$3$1.run(SVNImportWizard.java:137)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Caused by: org.tigris.subversion.javahl.ClientException: svn: Malformed network data
     at org.tigris.subversion.javahl.JavaHLObjectFactory.throwException(JavaHLObjectFactory.java:435)
     at org.tmatesoft.svn.core.javahl.SVNClientImpl.throwException(SVNClientImpl.java:1224)
     at org.tmatesoft.svn.core.javahl.SVNClientImpl.doImport(SVNClientImpl.java:601)
     at org.tigris.subversion.svnclientadapter.javahl.AbstractJhlClientAdapter.doImport(AbstractJhlClientAdapter.java:696)
     ... 5 more
I've been looking all morning for solutions, but to no avail.

Oracle VM Manager V2V Issue revolving Local Repo to each host.

Hi all,
I have 5 oracle SPARC hosts running in my environment. But the problem starts when I'm forced to commit to an unusual storage mapping by mapping each hosts to their individual local repository. Bear in mind that this is due to storage architecture constraint that we are forced to adapt to this form of mapping
Host 1 -> Repo1
Host 2 -> Repo2
Host 3 -> Repo3
Host 4 -> Repo4
Host 5 -> Repo5
Everything works out fine but we all know that V2V migration by OVM manager will not be possible because each hosts are only presented with their own local repo. I was wondering if we could somehow re-work the migration process. I tried this idea of a migration process.
1. Copy a virtual disk from host 1 to host 2 via SCP
2. Rebuild the VM via LDOM commands on host 2 with the transferred virtual disk.
3. When the VM is booted up via the terminal everything works out fine.
However OVM recognizes the VM as an orphan VM. The VM can still be accessed but cannot be editted via the OVM manager. This is because the OVM manager does not recognize the immediate changes done via the host terminal. I tried refreshing everything (server, disks), the OVM still cannot be updated and recognize the new VM was orphan.
The following are my inquiries:
1. Is my method feasible? Technically the VM was successfully cloned and migrated but in an orphan state. Is there a way to reactivate it?
2. Is there a better V2V method than this? (Local Repo constraint applied)
3. With this current architecture, is it possible to still carry out P2V migration?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Jerry

Hi all,
I have 5 oracle SPARC hosts running in my environment. But the problem starts when I'm forced to commit to an unusual storage mapping by mapping each hosts to their individual local repository. Bear in mind that this is due to storage architecture constraint that we are forced to adapt to this form of mapping
Host 1 -> Repo1
Host 2 -> Repo2
Host 3 -> Repo3
Host 4 -> Repo4
Host 5 -> Repo5
Everything works out fine but we all know that V2V migration by OVM manager will not be possible because each hosts are only presented with their own local repo. I was wondering if we could somehow re-work the migration process. I tried this idea of a migration process.
1. Copy a virtual disk from host 1 to host 2 via SCP
2. Rebuild the VM via LDOM commands on host 2 with the transferred virtual disk.
3. When the VM is booted up via the terminal everything works out fine.
However OVM recognizes the VM as an orphan VM. The VM can still be accessed but cannot be editted via the OVM manager. This is because the OVM manager does not recognize the immediate changes done via the host terminal. I tried refreshing everything (server, disks), the OVM still cannot be updated and recognize the new VM was orphan.
The following are my inquiries:
1. Is my method feasible? Technically the VM was successfully cloned and migrated but in an orphan state. Is there a way to reactivate it?
2. Is there a better V2V method than this? (Local Repo constraint applied)
3. With this current architecture, is it possible to still carry out P2V migration?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Jerry

Upgrade to SRU8.5 using local repository failed .

We downloaded the ISO image of latest SRU (8.5) and created local repository.
When we tried to upgrade a solaris 11 GA to SRU 8.5, we got following error.
Is it that in order to upgrade to latest SRU, al the previous SRUs need to be installed in that order?
When we upgraded to SRU 8.5 from oracle’s online repo, it worked.
root@test:~# pkg update -nv
Creating Plan -
pkg update: No solution was found to satisfy constraints
Plan Creation: Package solver has not found a solution to update to latest available versions.
This may indicate an overly constrained set of packages are installed.
latest incorporations:
pkg://solaris/consolidation/osnet/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.5.1:20120618T173352Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/userland/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120601T170434Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/install/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.7.0.2.0:20120416T210633Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/SunVTS/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.7.0.3.0:20120421T004225Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/ub_javavm/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164023Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/ips/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.7.0.4.0:20120430T200820Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/ldoms/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.3.0:20120525T222045Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/desktop/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.3.0:20120524T231910Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/desktop/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.3.0:20120524T231907Z
pkg://solaris/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.5.0:20120618T173955Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/X/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.2.1226:20120519T002403Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/cacao/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.6.0.1.0:20120323T204721Z
The following indicates why the system cannot update to the latest version:
No suitable version of required package pkg://solaris/consolidation/ub_javavm/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164023Z found:
Reject: pkg://solaris/consolidation/ub_javavm/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164023Z
Reason: All versions matching 'incorporate' dependency pkg:/runtime/java/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0 are rejected
Reject: pkg://solaris/runtime/java/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164136Z
Reason: A version for 'require' dependency on pkg:/system/library/c++/[email protected],5.11-0.164 cannot be found
No suitable version of required package pkg://solaris/runtime/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164207Z found:
Reject: pkg://solaris/runtime/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164207Z
Reason: All versions matching 'require' dependency pkg:/runtime/java/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0 are rejected
Reject: pkg://solaris/runtime/java/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164136Z
Reason: A version for 'require' dependency on pkg:/system/library/c++/[email protected],5.11-0.164 cannot be found
Edited by: 956322 on Aug 31, 2012 7:35 AM

We downloaded the ISO image of latest SRU (8.5) and created local repository.
When we tried to upgrade a solaris 11 GA to SRU 8.5, we got following error.
Is it that in order to upgrade to latest SRU, al the previous SRUs need to be installed in that order?
When we upgraded to SRU 8.5 from oracle’s online repo, it worked.
root@test:~# pkg update -nv
Creating Plan -
pkg update: No solution was found to satisfy constraints
Plan Creation: Package solver has not found a solution to update to latest available versions.
This may indicate an overly constrained set of packages are installed.
latest incorporations:
pkg://solaris/consolidation/osnet/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.5.1:20120618T173352Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/userland/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120601T170434Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/install/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.7.0.2.0:20120416T210633Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/SunVTS/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.7.0.3.0:20120421T004225Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/ub_javavm/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164023Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/ips/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.7.0.4.0:20120430T200820Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/ldoms/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.3.0:20120525T222045Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/desktop/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.3.0:20120524T231910Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/desktop/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.3.0:20120524T231907Z
pkg://solaris/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.5.0:20120618T173955Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/X/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.2.1226:20120519T002403Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/cacao/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.6.0.1.0:20120323T204721Z
The following indicates why the system cannot update to the latest version:
No suitable version of required package pkg://solaris/consolidation/ub_javavm/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164023Z found:
Reject: pkg://solaris/consolidation/ub_javavm/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164023Z
Reason: All versions matching 'incorporate' dependency pkg:/runtime/java/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0 are rejected
Reject: pkg://solaris/runtime/java/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164136Z
Reason: A version for 'require' dependency on pkg:/system/library/c++/[email protected],5.11-0.164 cannot be found
No suitable version of required package pkg://solaris/runtime/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164207Z found:
Reject: pkg://solaris/runtime/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164207Z
Reason: All versions matching 'require' dependency pkg:/runtime/java/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0 are rejected
Reject: pkg://solaris/runtime/java/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.8.0.4.0:20120604T164136Z
Reason: A version for 'require' dependency on pkg:/system/library/c++/[email protected],5.11-0.164 cannot be found
Edited by: 956322 on Aug 31, 2012 7:35 AM

Remote and local databases

let say that i access a oracle form through the web and that form access data from two distributed databases, then will there be a remote database and local database for the user or all the databases will be remote databases to the user

In my opinion.
using local databases -- access tables without DB_link
using Remote databases -- access tables through DB_link

Is it possible to boot oracle vm server over iSCSI and ipxe?

Hi,
Is it possible to boot oracle vm server over iSCSI and ipxe?
I have tried it, but got a kernel panic after the boot progress.
Can anyone tell me what should I do to install and or boot oracle vm server on and from a iscsi lun instead a local hard drive?
Thanks!
Redwan

959211 wrote:
Hi,
I have Windows 2008 R2 64 Bit Operating Server Installed.
Other software that are Installed :
1) Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate 32 Bit.
2) Microsoft SharePoint server 2010 64 Bit.
For my development purpose I want to install both oracle 11g client 32 bit and oracle 11g client 64 on the same machine.
Is it possible to install both 32 and 64 bit instance on the same machine.
Thanks
Sambityes, possible; but minor challenge to manage dynamically
how to ensure that you actually use the flavor you desire?

[SOLVED] Create local repository

Hello everyone!
First of all, I'd like to apologize for the terminology. I'm still not sure about what are the names I should use. That said, here's my problem: I want to set up a local repository to place all the packages I've ever built with makepkg. The main reason that has motivated me to do so is that, when building a package, I often need to install make dependencies, such as, for example, xorg-server-devel. That package in particular comes from xorg-server, which I have built by myself. Thus, if a package required it, I should install the correspondent package (the one I've built), and not the generic one coming from the repositories (this case may not be a good example, but, well, just think about kernel headers).
In order to set up the repository, I read Allan McRae's articles about makepkg, repo-add and package signing. I generated a key with GPG as explained here, taking the defaults, and added it to the pacman's keyring:
gpg --export Kalrish > Kalrish.key
pacman-key -a Kalrish.key
I also edited /etc/makepkg.conf as follows:
BUILDENV=(fakeroot !distcc color !ccache check sign)
Note that I've enabled sign.
I decided to maintain my "local repository" (please, correct me if I'm not making use of the correct terminology) in /var/abs/local. For that purpose, I edited /etc/makepkg.conf:
$ grep -m1 PKGDEST /etc/makepkg.conf
PKGDEST=/var/abs/local
I then built dhcpcd (which is relatively small), just to try out. makepkg put the package file in /var/abs/local as I intended; then, I did this:
repo-add 'local.db.tar.gz' 'dhcpcd-5.6.8-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz'
It asked me for the password to unlock my secret key. After entering it, all went well:
==> Adding package 'dhcpcd-5.6.8-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz'
-> Adding package signature...
-> Computing checksums...
-> Creating 'desc' db entry...
-> Creating 'depends' db entry...
==> Creating updated database file 'local.db.tar.gz'
And finally added the repo in /etc/pacman.conf (I'm only showing the relevant part of the file):
[local]
Server = file:///var/abs/local
I updated the package databases just fine with pacman -Syy. But, after removing the previously-downloaded packages from /var/cache/pacman/pkg, when trying to install the package:
$ pacman -Sy dhcpcd
:: Synchronizing package databases...
local is up to date
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
multilib is up to date
:: dhcpcd is in IgnorePkg/IgnoreGroup. Install anyway? [Y/n] y
warning: dhcpcd-5.6.8-3 is up to date -- reinstalling
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Packages (1): dhcpcd-5.6.8-3
Total Installed Size: 0.23 MiB
Net Upgrade Size: 0.00 MiB
:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
(1/1) checking keys in keyring [######################] 100%
(1/1) checking package integrity [######################] 100%
error: dhcpcd: signature from "Kalrish (Kalrish Bäakjen) <[email protected]>" is invalid
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/dhcpcd-5.6.8-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] n
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature))
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
So it seems that I have not added my key properly. Can anybody please help me? Any answer, even if it explained why I shouldn't be trying to do this or why I should try other alternatives, will be welcomed.
Best regards,
Kalrish
Last edited by Kalrish (2013-06-28 18:26:30)

drcouzelis wrote:... if you built the package on that machine yourself then all of the dependencies are already installed.
I was talking about make dependencies, not runtime dependencies. I always build with makepkg -sr :)
drcouzelis wrote:I hope I'm not being too critical. I just don't want you to work harder than you need to. :)
Of course not, don't worry.
Kalrish wrote:Any answer, even if it explained why I shouldn't be trying to do this or why I should try other alternatives, will be welcomed.
I love thought-provoking answers as well as personal opinions. Who knows when an unexpected explanation may change my mind and make me think different? You're right: it may not be worth it. But, well, you yourself pointed the "elegant" reason out:
drcouzelis wrote:I think the only benefit of creating a local repository is so you can use "pacman -S" instead of "pacman -U".
If pacman found the packages by itself, I wouldn't have to execute pacman -U --asdeps for every make dependency that is required by a package - but rather execute makepkg -sr and simply let pacman pick those packages I've built by myself from my local repository, and the rest from the official repos.

Master and work Repository

Hi,
Can we create Master and work repository in one oracle schema.
And can we create work2 respository in oracle schema2.
Do we find any issues later.
Please advice

As far as I know it is not recommended solution to create both master and work repositories in one Oracle schema, better create them as separate schemas.

The OraOledb.Oracle is not registered on the local machine.

Hi Everyone,
I am having Windows XP operating system with Service pack 2 on my computer. I also using Microsoft.Net 2003 & Oracle 9.x for creating a client-server Application. I installed the Oracle provider from OraWin9204.exe which i was downloaded from the Oracle's site. But I am getting the above mentioned problem "The OraOledb.Oracle is not registered on the local machine", while i m executing the open method of the Connection object of ADO.NET. I also checked the permission on ora92 (ORACLE HOME DIRECTORY) folder and gave full control to my username. But the problem remains same.
Can anybody have any idea? Please help me on [email protected]
Thanx
Rahul Ratnaker

make manual registration of following file.
[oracle_Home]\ora92\bin\OraOLEDB.dll
Enjoy
Rahul Ratnaker

Differences beetwen Oracle AS 10g Release 2 and Release 3

Hi
Could you give me links or just write about differences between Oracle AS 10g Release 2 and Release 3. I have books to Oracle 10g AS Release 2, and I don't know, what information are incorrect with reference to Release 3. I've found this link http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B32110_01/core.1013/b32196/whatsnew.htm#sthref7 , but Oracle 10g AS Release 3 for example does not require a metadata repository. So where can I find all diferences?
Thanks awfully for help.
Regards

Application Server 10R2 (10.1.2.0.2) includes products such as OID, Forms & Reports, Discoverer, Oracle Portal etc. These are not included in Application Server 10R3, which was a JEE only install geared towards JEE solutions.
Both versions will be desupported in December 2011 so I would spend to much time on these versions. Go with Fusion Middleware 11g : http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E21764_01/index.htm
Thanks,
EJ

Globle and local Inventory

Hi:
I know there are global inventory and local inventory. the global inventory is pointed by oraInst.loc. Where is local inventory? THX

Please see these MOS docs, it should answer your question.
Global and Local Inventory explained [ID 360079.1]
How to find the location of GLOBAL Inventory and LOCAL inventory on R12.x ? Need Clarifications Oracle Inventory [ID 878717.1]
How to create, update or rebuild the Central Inventory for Applications R12 [ID 742477.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Diplay Functional,Reporting and Local currency

Hi,
I've a requirement to display Transactions in functional,Reporting as well as in Local currency.Do I need to setup Oracle 11i Env in MRC for that?If so how to get the transactions displayed in Local cuirrency ?Do I need to Covert them or I've to create new set of books for the same like we create one for reporting currency?
This requirement is for 11.5.10.2 as well as R12
Thanks,
Mahender
Edited by: user518071 on Jul 30, 2010 6:20 AM

Hi
You need to do the following
In 11i
1. You need to set up Reporting Set of Books to get the transactions and reports in Reporting currency for Local Currency, Functional Currency.
2. If your Functional Currency is USD, Reporting Currency is EUR and Local Currency is AED, then you need to set Main SOB in USD and Reporting SOB in EUR and AED.
In R12
1. You can set Reporting currency if you need the transactions and reports in Reporting currency provided Chart of Accounts, Calendar and Convention is same.
If your Functional Currency is USD, Reporting Currency is EUR and Local Currency is AED, then you need to set Main SOB in USD and Reporting SOB in EUR and AED.
2. If the requirement is not only currency but you need for a different Calendar or COA or Accounting convention, then you need to set a Secondary Ledger
Hope this helps
Regards
Sivakumar

Oracle VM 3.1.1 and local repository

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for