Order Selection for Settlement using CO88

Hi
Is there a way to select orders by number , for Settlement . CO88 only allows Plant wise settlement
Regards

You can either select all the orders in CO88 - plant wise or single order KO88.
Individual order numbers not possible.
Regards
Ram

Similar Messages

Order Status for settlement

Hi All,
I need to find all the Settled process order of a particular period.
There is no system status getting activated for Settlement.
Thanks & regards
Mahesh

Hi Ranga,
My requirement is , while settling the process orders a Z exit will be triggered & redirect the Cost centre according to a Z table maintained. So while settling the orders I need to select all the settlable orders & i ll pass it thru the Exit for redirecting the variances to other cost centre.
While selection of the process orders I can select according to the status TECO but all the previous periods process orders will be also having the same status.So , to exclude the settled orders I need some "condition".But I could not see any status change after the Settlement.
Thanks & regards
Mahesh

When is SELECT FOR UPDATE used

DB version:10gR2
Since another thread of mine on this subject didn't go well, i am starting another thread.
When exactly is SELECT..FOR UPDATE statement used? With the exception of using SELECT...FOR UPDATE in CURSOR declaration, I've rarely seen SELECT ...FOR UPDATE being used explicitlyby PL/SQL gurus in our firm. Why didn't they use SELECT..FOR UPDATE(i mean a stand alone SELECT FOR UPDATE, not as a part of Cursor) to lock rows before UPDATE/DELETE/INSERT in their codes?
Edited by: M.Everett on Oct 20, 2008 12:00 PM
edited the initial post to let the users know that I am refering to a stand alone SELECT FOR UPDATE statement, not the part of a cursor

M.Everett wrote:
What i gather from various sources in the Internet:
1. SELECT FOR UPDATE is used mainly on CURSORs and very rarely used as a stand alone statement (if this is not the case you would have seen SELECT FOR UPDATE statements before every UPDATEs and DELETEs in PL/SQL codes)
2. Stand alone SELECT FOR UPDATEs are used mainly when dealing with CLOB, BLOB
Am i right in making these conclusions?1. This is probably a fair assumption.
2. Not really. SELECT FOR UPDATE is not a requirement when dealign with (C|B)LOBs.
SELECT FOR UPDATE allows an easy form of reference when you come to update rows in a cursor loop (although cursor loops should be rarely used), because rather than having to include a where condition on key columns you can just refer to the CURRENT ROW. Obviously, the main reason for using SFUs is the locking and this can become a requirement in some business environments where a user "picks up" a record to deal with and other users will then not see that record in their list or be able to select it for themselves.
;)

How To Document: Dynamic selection for InfoSpoke

Hello
I have downloaded and read the "How To" document: Dynamic selection for InfoSpoke & Use InfoSpoke Badi to correct KYF format
link: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/01d3a090-0201-0010-9783-bc33ab690e70&overridelayout=true
I'm mostly interested for the dynamic selection part of the document and the code for that seems to be stored in an attached text document (ZLX_ESS_INTERFACE.txt). The problem is that i cannot actually view it or any other txt in the pdf.
Can anyone who has got the txt file link it here please or suggest a program that would dynamicaly change the infospoke selections?
Actualy i'm not interested in having an input screen for filling the variable value, i just want to get the value from an ODS
any suggestions?
Thanx in advance
Fragi

Hello
I have downloaded and read the "How To" document: Dynamic selection for InfoSpoke & Use InfoSpoke Badi to correct KYF format
link: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/01d3a090-0201-0010-9783-bc33ab690e70&overridelayout=true
I'm mostly interested for the dynamic selection part of the document and the code for that seems to be stored in an attached text document (ZLX_ESS_INTERFACE.txt). The problem is that i cannot actually view it or any other txt in the pdf.
Can anyone who has got the txt file link it here please or suggest a program that would dynamicaly change the infospoke selections?
Actualy i'm not interested in having an input screen for filling the variable value, i just want to get the value from an ODS
any suggestions?
Thanx in advance
Fragi

Order types, why do we need to create our order types and not use the stand

HI
Order types, why do we need to create our order types and not use the standard ones during implementation.

Hi Raj,
Well there is no hard and fast rule that you have to copy nad create a new order type. Its just to meet our own requirements that we copy the standard and make the changes if required to meet our business needs.
And by this way we keep unchanged the standard order type for further use.
If you are sure that the standard order type satisfies your need you can directly use that only.
I hope this clarifies the issue.
Do reward if find useful
Regards,
Abhi

Clarification on SELECT for UPDATE

HI All,
I am doing a SELECT FOR UPDATE using NOWAIT as well as SKIPLOCKED option. I have question regarding the general behavior.
Suppose let say , I have two tables (table1 and table 2 ).
TABLE 1
header_id NUMBER,
service_id NUMBER
TABLE 2
header_id NUMBER,
line_id NUMBER,
status VARCHAR2
And I run the following query
SELECT t2.header_id, t2.line_id
FROM table1 t1, table2 t2
WHERE t1.header_id = t2.header_id
AND t1.service_id = 1
AND t2.status = 'SUCCESS'
FOR UPDATE OF t2.status NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED;
Questions
1) Does adding both the NOWAIT and SKIP LOCKED in the sql help or just SKIP LOCKED would do fine.
2) Lets say this SQL is executed when there are no rows with status as 'SUCCESS' in table2. Would this cause any performance impact. Like for example since its joining with table1 with table 2 based on the header id .Would it lock any rows on table1?
( My understanding was that it would not lock any row until it finds out any row with status as 'SUCCESS' but getting some conflicting answers)
Thanks,
Vj

AKVK wrote:
( My understanding was that it would not lock any row until it finds out any row with status as 'SUCCESS' but getting some conflicting answers)THis would be my understanding too.
To be sure make a test.
Do the select for update so that it does not lock any rows.
Then check the data dictionary select * from v$lock; to see for your session if there are any locks.

Interface for Procurement Using Catalogs (OCI)

Hello all,
I like to have a lot of explications for this cutomizing for a flow PM.I would like call a catalog if I create order PM never pass to EBP sytem.
If I finish this customizing Interface for Procurement Using Catalogs (OCI) in R/3 system who R/3 taking all informations for a catalog when a order PM has been created.
There is a button to use a catalog if a transaction IW31 or IW32 has been executed or not?
This version SAP is ECC5.
Thanks for your response.

Hi Mady,
here are high level steps for PM/OCI:
- SPRO: Maintenance and Service Orders -> Interface for Procurement Using Catalogs (OCI) --> Define Catalogs
- SPRO: Maintenance and Service Orders -> Interface for Procurement Using Catalogs (OCI) --> Assign Catalog to Order Type
As of SAP ECC 5.00, PLM Extension (EA_PLM 500), you can call up an external catalog in a maintenance order or service order, a maintenance task list or a network, and copy services from this catalog into the order or task list or network.
You also now have the option of storing multiple catalogs for each of the following criteria:
- Order type and planning plant
- Task list category and plant
- Network type and plant
If all this customizing is OK, a little "Catalog" button will appear in maintenance or service order transaction.
Rgds
Christophe

Selecting document type for settlement CJ88

During project or order settlement (CJ88,KO88) the document type "YP" specified in the Settlement Profile is used for the FI portion of the settlement, WBS to AUC, but the controlling entries use the default FI/CO document type. We would like all transactions in the settlement process, both FI and CO, to use the document type YP.
The controlling enties, settlement from WBS to WBS, post to FI through Real Time Integration CO-FI. If I change the document type in FAGLCOFIIMG from SA to YP then the CO settlement documents begin posting as YP as desired.
Is there a way to have Real Time CO-FI Integration select a variant by transaction type so it chooses YP for only settlement transactions? Or is there a better way to have all settlement transactions use the same document type?
Thanks,
Jeff

Go to transaction KOT2_OPA and check against the order type that you use, which settlement profile is assigned.Then go to transaction OKO7 to change the document type for that settlement profile. Document types can be created in transaction OBA7.

Settlement of Investment Order - Auto creation of Sub asset for settlement

< MODERATOR: Message locked. Please post this in the [ERP Financials - Asset Accounting|SAP ERP Financials - Asset Accounting;. >
Dear experts
Request your help on Investment orders settlement.
We are doing settlement of Investment orders to sub asset numbers, where sub assets are created well in advance.
Our client want system to create sub asset numbers automatically, while doing the settlement of Investment orders itself.
Is it possible ?, If possible, please let me know, what are the settings I need to do to meet this requirement.
Thanks in advance
S. Habib Pasha.

Hiya,
Go to IMG --> Controlling --> IO --> Actual Postings --> Settlement --> Automatic Generation of Settlement Rules.
There is no SAP Standard created for settlements to sub-assets, so you'll need to create one using option 4 there "User-Defined Strategies for Automatic Generation ...".
Once this is done, get an ABAP Developer to code the settlement rule by creating a custom project in that same transaction. The rule will be similar to the SAP Standard ones created in option 1 of the same node.
Once this is done, create strategy sequences for this, and assign to Order Type(s).
If your users can maintain a basic investment profile when creating the Order Master Data, the developer can be directed to pick that data (aka fields) for the creation of the subasset number.
Hope this helps.
Cheers.

Process order %00000000001 has been selected for deletion

Hi Guys,
With the use of strategy type 86 (assem bly processing for process order) when creating the sales order it is giving the error
Process order %00000000001 has been selected for deletion
Message no. V1796
According to process order will be created automatically with the order type PI04. Related setting for the order type Pi04 in the specified plant is done.
Pls help.

Solved..Change the customer number

Auto batch detmn for components in Process Order selects batch in Q status.

Hi Gurus,
We have the following issue with automatic batch determination for component batches for a Process Order:
Say for a Process Order it requires components A,B, and C.
The issue is with component C. if the PO requires 100 Qty of C. the system is picking batch X having 80 qty and picking 20 from another batch Y which is still in u201CQu201D status (due to some defects it is not cleared . for which inspection should have completed 3 days before Process Order is released).
Also there are only these two batches for this component in MMBE.
What I understand is system adds GR date + GR processing days ( for inspection) and release component for production after that (ie., moves to Un restricted stock). Therefore system selects this batch as per the availability check (by calculating the GR+ GR processing date) even thoe it is not cleared yet.
Also, I want to know If this is correct procedure, how can we make system to not to include batch with Q stock (batch which is having some defects).
Thanks,
N.

Hi
Use separate Checking Group(Availability Check) in MRP-3 view for comp C with the settings in OPJJ(Availability Check+Checking rule combination) with untick incl.quality insp stock. Idea is to select the un-restricted batch stock qty during Auto Batch determination for Components
Regards
Brahmaji

Use HR_READ_INFOTYPE or select (for all entries)

Hi
As I have understood the difference between FM HR_READ_INFOTYPE and a select directly from PA0001 (as example) is that the FM take the authorization into account. (please correct me if I am wrong).
My problem is that I need to select from the infotype for a lot of pernr, so I would use this statement:
    SELECT * FROM pa0001 INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE wt_pa0001
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN wt_pernr
         WHERE pernr = wt_pernr-pernr
          AND begda LE pn-endda
          AND endda GE pn-begda.
but then I don't get the authorization check.
For the FM HR_READ_INFOTYPE I can't use the "FOR ALL ENTRIES".
Can I do it in an easy way, or do need to do the select, and then use an authority check after the select from each infotype?

Calling HR_READ_INFOTYPE or selecting directly from the tables may depend on how much data you are processing. If you only need to retrieve a few records, you could process the PERNR records you need in a loop and call HR_READ_INFOTYPE for each. If you're processing a larger number of records, check the authorization for the each table first and then do a SELECT for all entries. Before you read, make sure that your "FOR ALL ENTRIES" table is not empty. In order to make your code more generic, you may want to use function module HR_CHECK_AUTHORITY_INFTY to check the authorization for each infotype. This is the FM that the HR_READ_INFOTYPE function module uses.
.. Craig

User status for investment order to block settlement to final asset

Hi,
I try to set up a user status to avoid user to settle internal/ investment order to final asset. I cannot find a user status that will let me make the distinction between the automatic settlement to AuC and the partial or full settlement to final asset.
The process we are using is that we do automatic settlement from investment order to AuC on a weekly basis and as soon as the final asset has been entered via KOB5 (distribution of line item) we would like to setlle it.
Do you know a way to set up a user status on an internal order to allow settlement to Asset under construction but not to final asset?
Thanks
Sabine

Hi,
I do not want to send the costs directly to final asset. Costs booked against the investment order should always first go to AuC and then to final asset. What we try to avoid is to have the 2 settlements immediately one after the other. We would like to have the settlement to AuC on a weekly basis and the other one only when capitalization is required. But if the final asset is already entered in the settlement rule of the order via KOB5, then there is a risk to settle to final asset. We would like to only run the second type of settlement only when the asset is ready to be capitalized. To be able to do that we thought about using the user status. For example, if status is "release", we could settle to Auc but not to final asset and if status is "approved", we could settle to final asset.
Do you see what I mean? I need a status that allows me to perform some transactions and another one that allows me some other business transactions. The problem is that the 2 settlements I am talking about are not recognized as business transaction but as processing type.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Sabine
Edited by: Sabine Janssen on Oct 14, 2009 10:46 AM

Error:(in tcodeVA02)"You cannot select assembly order 16600192 for deletion

when i am trying to delete one line item from sales order using VA02 tcode its throwing error "You cannot select assembly order 16600192 for deletion".
could you tell me please what might be the reason and how to resolve this issue.
waiting for your response.
thanks,
aritra
Message was edited by: Aritra Samanta
Message was edited by: Aritra Samanta

Let me ask you this: Is the assembly order 16600192 your VA02 order number? If not, your sales order item might have created an assembly order (with this number). Depending on its status, you may not be able to delete the assembly order and therefore the sales order item deletion is not possible.
Verify the assembly order status.
Good luck!

Field selection for order

Hi all
Can I know use of custumization trxn OIXW and OIRS (Field selection for order and sub order data field.)
My assumption was that when I make sequence chane in OIXW then tht will reflect in IW38/IW39.
but it is not so.
Basically I want to araange column sequence in Iw38 as per my requirement. instead of creating layout is there
any other procedure ?
Regards,
Prasad

Hi,
Any changes you make in field selection through OIXW or OIRS will reflect in IW38/IW39 as a global default variant.Any user variant created as default variant will have priority over this.So make it sure that this default variant is Protected one so that no one can chnage as you want this to be global variant.
regds,
atul

Order Selection for Settlement using CO88

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for