OrgChart and OrgPlanning sizing and productivity issues

Dear Experts,
Our customer is going to implement OrgChart and OrgPlanning solutions and having some concerns regarding sizing, productivity and some others. Could you please clarify the following questions?
1. If some objects or data are blocked in the moment of fetching from SAP to Nakisa (or Nakisa DB), how is it going to react on Nakisa? How will this affect sending idocs? And also while doing backward process: sending data from Nakisa if there blocked objects in SAP which should be updated or changed.
2. What is going to happen if objects/data are deleted from SAP back-end system while it’s being modeled and then transferring back into SAP from Nakisa?
3. In terms of OrgModeler: is it possible to create a position or another type of objects (basically duplicate one) choosing from the list of existing ones? Or if it’s creating then the only option you have is creating a new one with unique ID?
4. Are there any other formulas or advices on how to calculate sizing and hardware needs except what is described in Capacity Planning Guide?

Larry, thanks for the suggestions. I'll have to try them when I get home from work. I'm working with a 45,000 image library. Have now prepared about 155 Faces. Only a few Places so far. Nevertheless the wait in interminable when you are trying to get things done. I have to initiate an action and then click away and do something else while iPhoto churns away. I have Menu Meters showing the CPU in the menu bar. Most actions in iPhoto (particularly Face scanning)force both CPUs to 100%.
I imagine one of the features dragging the system down is the repeated Face scanning of the whole library. A future update simply has to include a setting to turn this action OFF when you are not interested in matching more Faces. As it stands, even to simply look at a Faces album initiates a full scan of the library (CPU 100%). While I appreciate the feature, there has got to be some way of turning it OFF when all you want to do is view photos.

Similar Messages

  • Production Issue Need urgent help

    We just added new disk on our db box. its sun 890 box after that the DB is running very slow and the cpu is showing 100% is there any way we can find out the cause of the issue.
    Any assistance will be highly appreciated.

    Check with the OS monitoring tools. You should provide the OS and DB versions in your thread so a more proper direction on the recommended tools can be provided.
    If you are on 10g you could use the performance monitor from the EM DB Console and you could see if Oracle is responsible for this high CPU consumption.
    By the way. I kindly suggest you to use a more descriptive thread title, 'Urgent' and 'Production Issue' doesn't let any body figure out what you are talking about. On the other hand, labeling urgent won't make all posters go running to solve this issue, all threads are treated equally on a first come first served basis and it depends on posters availability.
    ~ Madrid

  • Issue caused by change of Publisher ID and Product ID?

    I developed a Windows Phone app for a charity free of charge. I was developing the app under my own moniker and submitted all my code to a GitHub repository they had from when they had the iPhone app developed. When it came to publishing the app,
    it was one of their IT own staff which did the job, not me, and they registered themselves with Microsoft.  They received a new Publisher ID and Product ID as part of the app submittal process and updated GitHub.
    I downloaded the changes from GitHub and am no longer able to run the app from Visual Studio (2013 Ultimate) on an emulator or a physical device.  I can revert back to the original files for Package.appxmanifest, WMAppManifest.xml and the app is
    able to run.  However, this leaves me running with out of date code.
    Is the issue that I am not a registered developer with their Publisher ID?  If not, then what is the solution, other than running with the original files?  I have seen other suggestions that it may be the SplashScreen causing the issue but that
    is not the issue here.
    Thx

    This should do the trick for you:  If you're asked for the password to your previous Apple ID when signing out of iCloud - Apple Support

  • Restricting Goods Issue only against reservation and Production Oder

    HI all,
    Is it possible to restrict goods issue only against Reservation, and Production Order.
    I dont want the user to issue goods without refering to any reservation or Production Order.
    Thanks and Regads

    Hi,
    To restrict the same in MIGO, go to following path;
    SPRO > MM > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Settings for Enjoy Transactions > Settings for Goods Movements (MIGO) > Settings for Transactions and Reference Documents and Here Select Transaction "MIGO" and double click on "Transaction/event", here select "A07 Goods Issue" and double click on "Reference document" and remove only keep Active "Order" and "Reservation" and remove remaining. And then check in MIGO.

  • Open planned orders and production orders

    Hi friends,
    I have one issue with my client.
    Client has 1 lac materials in sap .Now he wants extract all materials open planned orders and open production orders with quantity and dates.
    Please tell me the process how i can extract the data from sap for above requirement.
    Thanks,
    Manoj

    Hi Manoj,
    For open planned order and production order select the respective box.
    But one suggestion. Try to convince client that this report will take a lot of time as you have mentioned 1 lac materials are there.
    You can exclude system status and get it with below screen as mentioned already.
    But my suggestion is to run the report at night when the system load is very less. Please create a background job one for planned order and another for production order. Then run it in midnight as per the customer requirement in background. You can automate the process by sending automatic mail to customer. Please refer the below link to trigger mail.
    Mail Trigger with TEXT file via JOB run
    Regards,
    Krishnendu.

  • Cache and performance issue in browsing SSAS cube using Excel for first time

    Hello Group Members,
    I am facing a cache and performance issue for the first time, when I try to open a SSAS cube connection using Excel (using Data tab  -> From Other Sources --> From Analysis Services) after daily cube refresh. In end users
    system (8 GB RAM), for the first time, it takes 10 minutes to open the cube. From next run onwards, its open up quickly within 10 secs.
    We have daily ETL process running in high end servers. The configuration of dedicated SSAS cube server is 8 core, 64GB RAM. In total we have 4 cubes - out of which for 3 is full cube refresh and 1 is incremental refresh. We have seen after
    daily cube refresh, it takes 10 odd minutes to open the cube in end users system. From next time onwards, it opens up really fast with 10 secs. After cube refresh, in server systems (16 GB RAM), it takes 2 odd minutes to open the cube.
    Is there, any way we could reduce the time taken for first attempt ?
    Best Regards, Arka Mitra.

    Thanks Richard and Charlie,
    We have implemented the solution/suggestions in our DEV environment and we have seen a definite improvement. We are waiting this to be deployed in UAT environment to note down the actual performance and time improvement while browsing the cube for the
    first time after daily cube refresh.
    Guys,
    This is what we have done:
    We have 4 cube databases and each cube db has 1-8 cubes.
    1. We are doing daily cube refresh using SQL jobs as follows:
    <Batch xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine">
    <Parallel>
    <Process xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ddl2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2" xmlns:ddl2_2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2" xmlns:ddl100_100="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100" xmlns:ddl200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200" xmlns:ddl200_200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200">
    <Object>
    <DatabaseID>FINANCE CUBES</DatabaseID>
    </Object>
    <Type>ProcessFull</Type>
    <WriteBackTableCreation>UseExisting</WriteBackTableCreation>
    </Process>
    </Parallel>
    </Batch>
    2. Next we are creating a separate SQL job (Cache Warming - Profitability Analysis) for cube cache warming for each single cube in each cube db like:
    CREATE CACHE FOR [Profit Analysis] AS
    {[Measures].members}
    *[TIME].[FINANCIAL QUARTER].[FINANCIAL QUARTER]
    3. Finally after each cube refresh step, we are creating a new step of type T-SQL where we are calling these individual steps:
    EXEC dbo.sp_start_job N'Cache Warming - Profit Analysis';
    GO
    I will update the post after I receive the actual im[provement from UAT/ Production environment.
    Best Regards, Arka Mitra.

  • Change in PO Price after goods receipts and goods issue

    Dear All,
    Happy Holidays!! Wishing you a happy and fun-filled holiday season.
    I would appreciate your input of the issue at hand. I support MM users in and Oil & Gas downstream company.
    Issue
    Purchase Orders are created using price estimates. The price of oil products fluctuates and we usually cannot get the exact price at the point of creation of the PO.
    We use Moving Average Price (MAP) for stock valuation and so the price & quantity in the PO affects the moving average price.
    We use price estimates to create the PO but when we receive the final price for the oil products from the Supplier, most times there is a significant difference between the estimated price and the final price. Usually, at this point, we have completed all goods receipts and goods issues against the PO and are unable to make changes.
    We have an issue posting the invoice because the invoice value is significantly higher than the PO value. We also have an issue with the moving average price because it is understated as a result of this.
    To reiterate, this is a summary of the issue:
    At the point if PO creation ; Quantity = 10, 000 MT Price = $650
    Later when final price is available; Quantity = 10, 000 MT Price = $715
    Any advise on how to treat this issue, please? Your assistance will be truly appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hi All
    For my client I have to map the similar requirement for material price which is subject to more than 15% fluctuation. The actual invoice price is having quite a huge difference.
    Below are my limitations within which need to give a solution.
    PO is subject to release strategy and Material is delivered over a longer duration of time. Hence there is problem to de-Release the PO everytime price is changed.
    Since differnce is so huge, the same can not be settled during the MIRO.
    Down Payments has to be posted hence PO has to be created with estimated base price.
    Please suggest me suitable alternative options which will require no changes in PO and the price change also can be accomodated during the MIRO for  Multiple goods receipts.

  • Vendor and Product ID

    I've just started having random shutdown issues. When I checked console.log, I found this, constantly repeating:
    Looking for devices matching vendor ID=1193 and product ID=8717
    Looking for devices matching vendor ID=1193 and product ID=8718
    Any ideas as to what that means? Obviously, I have some software looking for some hardware, but how do I find it.
    Thanks.

    The message means that the computer is searching for a Canon scanner that isn't connected, msalzberg (or, at least, the Canon "Button Manager" software is looking for it).
    See http://josh.corduroy.biz/2005/12/07/canon-scanner-error-messages/
    It is not likely to be related to your shutdown issues, though, I fear.
    A power supply problem is much more likely to be the cause of your shutdowns. It should be covered by one of the the Apple extension repair programs if your are out of warranty .
    Cheers
    Rod

  • DRQ: Different default warehouse for Sales,Purchase and Production Process

    Hi Experts,
    In my recent Implementation Project I realised that there should be provision of capturing and using different default warehouse for Sales,Purchase and Production.
    For example in manufacturing company
    1. Default ware house for Purchase process should be QC ware house for raw material.
    2. Default ware house for Production process should be RM ware house for raw material (components).
    3. Default ware house for Production process should be QC ware house for Finished Good (Parent Item).
    4. Default ware house for Sales process should be FG ware house for Finished Good (Parent Item).
    I hope the idea is clear, I am looking for 3 different set as default warehouse for each item in Item master Inventory tab.
    Internally when a user create a document than default warehouse is to be picked up from this setting !
    Best Regards,
    Samir Gandhi

    Hi !
    I guess the indicator "Exclusive" in the accessess of the access sequence can meet the requirement if I have note misunderstood the issue.
    Press : F1 help on Exclusive Indicator -
    Indicator: Exclusive condition access
    Controls whether the system stops searching for a record after the first successful access for a condition type within an access sequence.
    Thanks & Regards

  • Project Gantt Bar Bug in P6 (EPPM and PM) - A strange and Unique Issue

    Hello All,
    I have 18 projects in my production EPS but one has a problem, i've been unable to resolve, so far.
    The Issue*
    In the Project-Layout-View (Project Space), when I look at project X's Gantt Bar, following is observed.
    A- When he Project is Open:
    All is good. There is no issue.
    1- The bar length and position are good, i.e., it starts and ends at right location on the timescale.
    2- The bar has two colours (blue for actual and green for remaining) separated at the point where the Data Date is.
    3- Project Baseline Bar is all good
    B- When the Project is Closed:
    The Bar goes corrupt.
    1- The bar starts at the right spot on timescale but goes beyond its forecast finish by about 1 year.
    2- The whole bar has only one colour, blue, which mis-informs the viewer that the project has completed.
    3- Project Baseline Bar stays good
    Issue Environment"
    - I have P6 V8.2 (stand alone) and P6 V8.0 (Enterprise) both on Win 7 and the issue appears in both.
    - The issue appeared about halfway of the project progress.
    - I've tried summarizing - but in vain
    Look forward to seeing some interesting solution(s) from you.
    Regards

    Thanks ITPM
    Creating a new layout from scratch did not help.
    But something else happened that fixed the problem.
    The issue disappeared as soon as I updated the schedule in question with an updated XER, as our usual fortnightly exercise. So, looks like the issue started and ended in the source database.
    Now, when I stack the latest as well as 20 archived copies of project X sorted by finish dates, and all closed, in the project layout view, I see a nicely (uniformly) increasing blue colour, project after project, except the last fortnight's archive copy whose Gantt bar is corrupt - corrupt as described in the very first text of this thread.
    I still don’t know why and shall keep thinking about and shall ask the source re their view(s). This is not a serious issue for me but, could be serious to those fellows who have their summary/tracking layouts accessible (or designed to be accessible) by their project staff.

  • Error occurred in deployment step 'Install app for SharePoint': The provided App differs from another App with the same version and product ID.

    I am facing this problem while start debugging the Provider-Hosted app through VS2013. I want to deploy the app with same version. So please let me know any solution
    to remove the app instance from office365 online, so that I can deploy the same app with same version on the specified "Developer Site".
    Note: If I change the version in AppManifesst.xml file then this problem/error gets resolved. But I want to deploy with the same version as
    per my business requirement.
    The actual error renders while I click to "Start" button of the Visual Studio 2013 to deploy the provider-hosted app, for the sake
    to deploying it on say "ABC" site collection (i.e. developer site). I work on office365 online. Therefore, request you to please provide the solution for SharePoint online office 365. The occurrences is:
    "Error occurred in deployment step 'Install app for SharePoint': The provided App differs from another App with the
    same version and product ID."
    Please assist me anyone. It will be so kind of you.....
    Naveen Kumar
    Steria India Ltd.

    Did you updated the  AppManifest.xml file
    and change the version.
    If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

  • Logic 6 and Tiger Issue

    I just upgraded to tiger, from panther.. I'm still using logic pro 6, and after 3 days of erratic behaviour (long long start ups amongst other dialogue boxes), now it wont start up at all.
    I also use a motu 828 mkII, and have installed the latest tiger drivers for this product, to no avail.
    If anyone wants to know, i really don't think it's compatible with tiger, and although i was going to upgrade anyway as soon as i could, now i have a problem..... do i go back to panther in order to finish my tune? what a waste of time! Shame there wasnt a warning from apple..so i do it for you.

    Nathan Pangburn, "Logic 6 and Tiger Issue" #3, 11:38am Oct 26, 2005 CDT
    Be aware, there is one bug that I know of with Logic Pro 6.4 and 10.4. If you try to change a song's metronome settings, Logic will crash.
    I think that's the only known issue.
    The workaround is to create songs in 10.3 with the desired metronome settings and use them as templates in 10.4.

  • Elitepad 900 tablet shows missing serial and product info when booting

    Hi,
    i recently updated my tablet from windows 8 to windows 8.1 and then updated bios. after this upgrade on boot screen it shows missing aerial number and product info. please note that i have not changed the board or any other hardware. please help me to resolve this.
    regards
    Raees

    Hello Malik-Raees,
    I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial product. You can do this at http://h30499.www3.hp.com/hpeb/ .
    I hope this helps!
    Best regards,
    I worked on behalf of HP.

  • MRP and Reservation issue

    Dear Gurus,
    Our scenario for chemical industry is  MTS with strategy 10.
    After MRP run for material 15 Planned orders are generated. After converting planned orders to Process orders are generated on same day 05/01/2012.
    But actual production starts earlier on 25/12/2011 when process order date changed to 25/12/2011 and try to do batch determination error occurs as Material not available on 25/12/2011,though enough stock exists.
    After TECO (all other 14 process orders) this allow process order to do Batch determination.
    Why this error occurs ?
    Please guide.
    JHPert

    Hi Pert,
    The issue is in ATP logic. Please check of you have comsidered the reservation in ATP and also the pal orders and production orders as welll.

  • MSDN and Production Environment (again)

    I started this on another forum before I found this one, but this seems a more suitable place.
    The definition of "production environment" seems rather odd. In some responses on this forum it appears to refer to "soft" systems whereas the latest MSDN licence refers to environment and physical kit.
    Below is a conversation I had over email with someone from MSDN and I find the whole thing utterly bizarre. I cannot for the life of me see how this helps anyone apart from MS being able to charge for non-production software. It renders having a powerful desktop
    for local lab experimentation pointless as you're not allowed to install anything and effectively doubles the hardware cost to small companies if they have to buy a separate server for any testing work (yes, best practice and all that, but budgets...) or pay
    out for a Windows Datacenter licence.
    Question:
    “If a physical machine running one or more virtual machines is used entirely for development and test, then the operating system used on the physical host system can be MSDN software. However, if the physical machine or any of the VMs hosted on that physical
    system are used for other purposes, then both the operating system within the VM and the operating system for the physical host must be licensed separately.”
    Is this actually saying that if I have a physical server licenced with a purchased (not MSDN) Server 2012 R2, running Hyper-V with, say, a production file server VM on it,  that ALL Windows VMs on that machine must have purchased licences even if they
    are only for development & testing purposes?
    Is this saying that all production and development Windows VMs must be only completely separate hardware, cluster, SAN, etc otherwise you must pay for full licences for the VMs?
    Or does it just mean that the bare metal licence (plus any additional ones required for running further production VMs) must be purchased if the VMs are a mix of production and development?
    Answer:
    We kindly inform that any products licensed under the developer tools model (e.g. SQL/BizTalk developer and/or MSDN) must be installed on their own separate physical hardware.
    You are not allowed to run test or development products on a server where production workloads are running at the same time.  Kindly run your developer software on a device/host that is dedicated to testing and development.
    Explanation:
    The Product Use Rights (PUR) say that the developer software is not licensed for use in a production environment. Even if the PUR does not have a separate definition of production environment, a production environment is a set of resources for network, physically
    dedicated hardware and software to provide "live" service.  If the intent was to say that the same physical server could be used for both development and production - it would say "not licensed for use in a production OSE," instead
    it says environment.
    See current PUR, page  51:
    Developer Tools (User License)
    You have the rights below for each license you acquire.
    #      You must assign each license to a single user.
    #      Each Licensed User may run an unlimited number of copies of the Developer Tools software and any prior version on any device.
    #      The Licensed User may use the software for evaluation and to design, develop, test, and demonstrate your programs. These rights include the use of the software to simulate an end user environment to diagnose issues related to your programs.
    #      The software is not licensed for use in a production environment. #      Additional rights provided in license terms included with the software are additive to these product use rights, provided that there is no conflict
    with these product use rights, except for superseding use terms outlined below.
    Question:
    Classifying an entire physical infrastructure as "production" in these days of virtualisation and shared storage really does not make any sense at all. Not using the software for production purposes makes perfect sense, but not being able to locate
    it alongside production OS installs is mad. Does this only apply to the server running the VM (CPU and RAM)? If the VHDX is hosted on shared SAN storage does the SAN have to be dedicated to non-production storage?
    Answer:
    We kindly inform that after double-checking the case we would like to confirm the development software cannot be run on the same hardware with production software.
    We have also received a feedback from the responsible team regarding your request about a dedicated SAN (Storage Area Network) for MSDN software.
    They have confirmed that the SAN has to be dedicated to the development and testing environment if it is used to run the software acquired through MSDN.
    Question:
    OK, so if I have my desktop (which is a production environment as I use it for email and other day to day office tasks), can I turn on Hyper-V and install an MSDN Windows Server 2012 instance for development purposes?
    Answer:
    We kindly inform it is not allowed to install and run software from MSDN subscriptions in production environments. Please do not install MSDN software on a desktop in a production environment:
    "[.] The customer will need to run the developer software on a device/host that is dedicated to testing and development.
    Explanation:
    The Product Use Rights (PUR) say that the developer software is not licensed for use in a production environment. Even if the PUR does not have a separate definition of production environment, a production environment is a set of resources for network, physically
    dedicated hardware and software to provide "live" service.  If the intent was to say that the same physical server could be used for both development and production - it would say "not licensed for use in a production OSE," instead
    it says environment.
    See current PUR, page  51:
    Developer Tools (User License)
    You have the rights below for each license you acquire.
    -      You must assign each license to a single user.
    -      Each Licensed User may run an unlimited number of copies of the Developer Tools software and any prior version on any device.
    -      The Licensed User may use the software for evaluation and to design, develop, test, and demonstrate your programs. These rights include the use of the software to simulate an end user environment to diagnose issues related to your programs.
    -  The software is not licensed for use in a production environment.
    -      Additional rights provided in license terms included with the software are additive to these product use rights, provided that there is no conflict with these product use rights, except for superseding use terms outlined below.

    Hi Mike,
    It sucks that MSDN software can't be run in a production environment, that means you have to have two entirely separate hardware environments, which are costly, and it seems unnecessary.  
    That's essentially it. I'm not saying for one second that it should be used for production purposes, just that it's physical location shouldn't be relevant. Also, the word "environment" is a very bad choice in the documentation simply because it's very open
    to interpretation.
    A production environment is defined as an environment that is accessed by end users of an application (such as an Internet Web site) and that is used for more than
    Acceptance Testing of that application
    or Feedback. Some scenarios that constitute production
    environments include:
    Environments that connect to a production database.
    Environments that support disaster-recovery or backup for a production environment.
    Environments that are used for production at least some of the time, such a server that is rotated into production during peak periods of activity.
    So I dont think (here's that inconclusive language) but am not sure that your desktop machines count as production environments, based on that, unless end users are connecting to them. (I dearly hope they are not!)
    My reading is based on the "Other Guidance" section:
    "If a physical machine running one or more virtual machines is used entirely for development and test, then the operating system used on the physical host system can be MSDN software. However, if the physical machine or any of the VMs
    hosted on that physical system are used for other purposes, then both the operating system within the VM and the operating system for the physical host must be licensed separately."
    <o:p>This is the crux of the matter and the interpretation of "licensed separately". A (to my mind) sensible reading of that would be "if you're running any production purpose VMs on a server then the physical host OS must be a full licence
    [presuming it's Server 2012 and not, say, VMWare or Hyper-V 2012] as must all production purpose VMs on that server". This has been getting interpreted by others (I'm not the first) and backed up by MS as meaning that if you want to run any dev/test VMs on
    a server that also runs production VMs then you can't use MSDN for those dev/test VMs.</o:p>
    Also, there is a section
    here, on the MSDN Licensing help page that says (with my added emphasis):
    Many
    MSDN subscribers use a computer for mixed use—both design, development, testing, and demonstration of your programs (the use allowed under the MSDN subscription license) and some other use.  Using the software in any other way, such as for doing email,
    playing games, or editing a document is another use and is not covered by the MSDN subscription license. 
    When this happens, the underlying operating system must also be licensed normally by purchasing a regular copy of Windows such as the one that came with a new OEM PC.
    Now to me, it seems this might be saying that the underlying operating system on a work
    machine cannot be licensed using MSDN if that work machine is going to be doing non-msdn things in addition to MSDN things.  It doesn't say "This can't happen" it just says "When this happens, the underlying
    OS must be licensed normally..." 
    So, based on what I'm reading it seems that this quote from you might not be true:
    "We can't install a local MSDN instance of Server 2012 or 8.1 for dev and test under Hyper-V on desktops
    because desktops used for email, writing documents, etc are production. "
    I wouldn't have expected this to be true either, but this is the response I was given. It may well be
    that my question was misunderstood. I hope this is the case otherwise one of the big reasons for turning on Hyper-V on  expensive, powerful desktops enabling the running of personal test environments goes out the window!
    Thanks for your time on this.

Maybe you are looking for